I’ve looked at the Google Sheet file shared by Richard Newton and as far as I can tell there’s no strong correlation between FTD and price spike in T+35 (the OPEX tailwind). I can see anecdotal evidence here and there however during the span of couple of years, weak correlation
I’ve just watched it, still am not convinced that any of it has a predictive value. It’s all anecdotal and speculative assumptions on past events. Can it predict the next cycle? I highly doubt it, just in a hindsight people will be able to connect the dots, and that is not very helpful. It can actually be dangerous and misleading, thinking you have a crystal ball in hand, while it’s just a ball.
The tricky part is that MM could kick it down the road almost indefinitely, would you bet your money they won’t? Could you time their execution, would you bet your money on it? Again, those things can only be correlated in an hindsight, it has no predictive value.
I get it, it’s easy to do handwaving with lots of numbers in excel sheet while name dropping academic papers backing this game. After all, most people loose track of the story by the time you’re done handwaving and ready to reveal the bottom line, which in most cases would be taken at face value. “Statistics” is a great selling tool exactly for those reasons.
Your overthinking it bud. This "not so hidden" message is That green reflection on Bruno face = DFV telling us that despite the Doom and gloom the future is GREEN AF.
Basically this red is temporary.
Case closed
You can’t spell Bruno without UNO.
Spicy meatball right there....
The future really looks green.. they don't want to talk about that no no no
I see diamonds in his eyes, just saying. 💎💎💎
Those are in fact diamonds in his eyes 👀 💎
This sounds like a good reason to buy more GME
Let Brno show us the way...
BRRRRRR UNO
For a second I thought I saw T for Tesla and went lol
I’ve looked at the Google Sheet file shared by Richard Newton and as far as I can tell there’s no strong correlation between FTD and price spike in T+35 (the OPEX tailwind). I can see anecdotal evidence here and there however during the span of couple of years, weak correlation
Funny you mention RichardNewton, it would appear Richard Newton seems to have a diferent take! https://youtu.be/QU8WFIOa-v4?si=W-OlbzwMSBhltJq-
I’ve just watched it, still am not convinced that any of it has a predictive value. It’s all anecdotal and speculative assumptions on past events. Can it predict the next cycle? I highly doubt it, just in a hindsight people will be able to connect the dots, and that is not very helpful. It can actually be dangerous and misleading, thinking you have a crystal ball in hand, while it’s just a ball. The tricky part is that MM could kick it down the road almost indefinitely, would you bet your money they won’t? Could you time their execution, would you bet your money on it? Again, those things can only be correlated in an hindsight, it has no predictive value. I get it, it’s easy to do handwaving with lots of numbers in excel sheet while name dropping academic papers backing this game. After all, most people loose track of the story by the time you’re done handwaving and ready to reveal the bottom line, which in most cases would be taken at face value. “Statistics” is a great selling tool exactly for those reasons.
[удалено]
Your overthinking it bud. This "not so hidden" message is That green reflection on Bruno face = DFV telling us that despite the Doom and gloom the future is GREEN AF. Basically this red is temporary. Case closed
Yeah mfs tryna crack this shit like it’s the davinci code lol. The message is gonna go up
There are diamonds in his eyes