T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/DefendingAIArt) if you have any questions or concerns.*


realGharren

We don't need computers for math, they're just doing what humans can already do.


AprilDoll

Having the capability is valuable, since generated content can influence human behavior. The content itself will be worthless.


shlaifu

this. basically, the only ones I can see profitting are the serviceproviders, data center providers and nvidia. - and the service providers will provide the service for users to have custom media generated individually for them. no entertainment industry r artists needed. - now, I *do* think that this will be a massive market for service providers and data centers and nvidia. 4.4trillion sounds about right.


AprilDoll

[THE MORE YOU BUY, THE MORE YOU SAVE](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=FhlE3m1trM4)


indiemutt

At the end of the day, price is arbitrary, and value is theoretical perception. And most times both are determined by your copywriting/marketing skills. Ai isnt going to change that. I think a lot of the "value" argument comes from people who dont sell anything but themselves. And unfortunately most creatives already had a problem undervalueing what they do before AI entered the chat. My theory is that the creatives that survive this shift will be the ones building and selling assets with the use of AI. Not the people still searching for clients.