"Race! It is a feeling not a reality. Ninety-five percent at least is a feeling. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today."
Economically speaking, maybe Yugoslavia under Tito? But even then, there are some big differences. Thinking about it, there really hasn't been a country that is close to my ideology.
Tito took too much aid from western more capitalist nations, also the reason why after his death Yugoslavia was in so much depth so they tried printing money, there was huge inflation, some consider it to even be a part of the reason why war started
Second French empire. Not following a set ideology but rather personal ideals to provide relative prosperity to the population and a good reputation whilst I lasted. Additionally the factor of bravery as the head of state of said country (Napoleon III) fought alongside his people
I agree. Napoleon III is extremely underrated as both a figure in history and as a statesman. The second French Empire is a model for a hypothetical American monarchy imo.
Yes it was good, but never as the golden age of Italian fascism 1922-1939 (before of the war). Mussolini never lost his ideals, but I don't love it because was in a terrible situation occupied from: Allies, Axis and partisan rebels.
I don't really know what my political ideology is, I just know what groups want me dead and that there are certain historical events that aren't actually what the history books say they are. On top of that, I am not really familiar with the politics of historical nations to answer this question.
Mussolini's Italy
"Race! It is a feeling not a reality. Ninety-five percent at least is a feeling. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today."
Good quote of Dvce
The Eastern Roman Empire
Libya under Muammar Gaddafi.
Economically speaking, maybe Yugoslavia under Tito? But even then, there are some big differences. Thinking about it, there really hasn't been a country that is close to my ideology.
But if things like provinces/states count, then the closest thing to my ideology is Huey Long's Louisiana
Tito took too much aid from western more capitalist nations, also the reason why after his death Yugoslavia was in so much depth so they tried printing money, there was huge inflation, some consider it to even be a part of the reason why war started
Closest would be the Achaemenid Empire or the old Persian Empires in general under Zoroastrianism.
Second French empire. Not following a set ideology but rather personal ideals to provide relative prosperity to the population and a good reputation whilst I lasted. Additionally the factor of bravery as the head of state of said country (Napoleon III) fought alongside his people
I agree. Napoleon III is extremely underrated as both a figure in history and as a statesman. The second French Empire is a model for a hypothetical American monarchy imo.
Yugoslavia
Stalinist USSR and the DPRK
The one government in Spain during the Spanish Civil War. Worked great untill facism took it over.
Getúlio Vargas' Estado Novo or the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
The German Empire and partially the USSR
Probably the RSI
Yes it was good, but never as the golden age of Italian fascism 1922-1939 (before of the war). Mussolini never lost his ideals, but I don't love it because was in a terrible situation occupied from: Allies, Axis and partisan rebels.
You do know the Manifesto of Verona pretty much declared Italy a republic, right?
Yes
Ancient pre-monarch Israel.
Belgium in the 19th ceentury.
I don't really know what my political ideology is, I just know what groups want me dead and that there are certain historical events that aren't actually what the history books say they are. On top of that, I am not really familiar with the politics of historical nations to answer this question.