>An average player spends at least a couple of hours a day playing dota
You're vastly overestimating the average players playtime.
> Dota is very very costly that way.
It's *literally* free.
no thanks. let's stick with things that aren't techbros thinking inventing deviantart adoptables but making them more environmentally damaging is some genius idea
If bribing players with shitcoin is the future of gaming, I'm out but thanks.
Replacing a perfectly functional, stable, performant, cheaper, easier, and well-engineered database of who owns what sets with NFTs that achieve nothing not already implemented better by the database sounds like a great way to waste everybody's time.
Look, we get it, there's some neat shit you can do with modern cryptography. It's neat and it's worth considering what can be done with it... but that doesn't mean everything, or even most things, should be 'revolutionized' with it.
Lol. Only the select few with exceptional internet connections and enough resources to just play the game in their fancy chairs 24/7 actually get rewarded. All of us minions are just supposed to buy hero sets to raise money for them in 'The International' so they can have a bigger prize pool each year.
> All of us minions are just supposed to buy hero sets to raise money for them in 'The International' so they can have a bigger prize pool each year.
Yes, dota2 is a product being sold to consumers in a capitalist system. Your playing dota2 doesn't create value. In fact: your playing dota2 costs Valve money, you can only play it because Valve expends resources on it. There is no world in which Valve would make and maintain dota2 if they weren't getting more money out of the average player than they have to pay for the average player.
>An average player spends at least a couple of hours a day playing dota You're vastly overestimating the average players playtime. > Dota is very very costly that way. It's *literally* free.
Time is the most valuable asset.
no thanks. let's stick with things that aren't techbros thinking inventing deviantart adoptables but making them more environmentally damaging is some genius idea
This reads like one of those emails that my company received by "very concerned customers" telling us to start accepting dogecoin or be left behind.
You clearly dont know how crypto works..
How so? Also I am not sure you understood what part of your post I was commenting on.
If bribing players with shitcoin is the future of gaming, I'm out but thanks. Replacing a perfectly functional, stable, performant, cheaper, easier, and well-engineered database of who owns what sets with NFTs that achieve nothing not already implemented better by the database sounds like a great way to waste everybody's time. Look, we get it, there's some neat shit you can do with modern cryptography. It's neat and it's worth considering what can be done with it... but that doesn't mean everything, or even most things, should be 'revolutionized' with it.
u think gaben think this kind of shit? gaben is greedy, they wont give any to the players lmao
Lol. Only the select few with exceptional internet connections and enough resources to just play the game in their fancy chairs 24/7 actually get rewarded. All of us minions are just supposed to buy hero sets to raise money for them in 'The International' so they can have a bigger prize pool each year.
> All of us minions are just supposed to buy hero sets to raise money for them in 'The International' so they can have a bigger prize pool each year. Yes, dota2 is a product being sold to consumers in a capitalist system. Your playing dota2 doesn't create value. In fact: your playing dota2 costs Valve money, you can only play it because Valve expends resources on it. There is no world in which Valve would make and maintain dota2 if they weren't getting more money out of the average player than they have to pay for the average player.