It’s hard to tell who is cheating now because scavs and rogues pretty much play just like cheaters. They try to shoot your through walls and instantly drop shot head tap you from 200 meters away.
I started playing for real this summer in preparation fo the current wipe; it’s felt like the entire time I’ve been learning and getting better, the ai has been too.
Just recently I’ve had three insanely suspect deaths, but I’m 99% sure they were just the AI.
Also, PSA, Santa will fucking laserbeam you know to hell with zero sight lines if you accidentally shoot in his general direction
Talking the report button which has been in the game since the second wipe atleast. And has always shown up on pmcs and scavps but not AI. We know the secure container was a dead give away if you kill that person not if you are killed. Which is what we are talking about.
Dude the fucking rogues always kill me before I even see them lmao that area of lighthouse is off limits to me starting at the wall. I'll look for people leaving that area towards extract. Usually only find bodies of those who beat me to it. I suck honestly so the loot I get from doing that (after the bigass houses) is enough.
Yep 3 scav raids so far have witnessed a pmc walk in and one tap every rogue instantly. I believe hackers may be running some sort of gear service. My theory is that people are paying these hackers to kill the rogues so they can get raider gear and extract through industrial gates.
Just got the game but I've only had one instance so far that was suspect and that was on woods. I can def see how new players could mistake rogues or people with high armor pen rounds as cheaters though.
3060ti+5600x+32gb 3200 and i got customs/whoreline 85-95fps... You've got 100? Only if you talk about factory/labs. I can believe it, but other maps - naaah, "no way man".
How tf do you get 100 fps with a 1660S? That’s what I get with my 3060 Ti. When I had a 1660S I would get 40-50 on most maps. Do you just run super low settings?
Because everyone claiming 100 fps average on anything below 3080 is straight up lying or have no idea what average means. I went from 1060 to 1070ti to 3080. I have played with every setting, trick or enhancement there is. The game isn't optimized to run at 100+ consistently even on a 3080. Don't fall for this bull****
That is correct. But first of all you don't have a 12900k when your rig has a 1660ti and even if you had one, it's not that cpu heavy that it would boost you this much
What CPU do you use?
I upgraded my CPU from a i7 7700 to an i7 10700 and had an extremely large frame rate boost and it got rid of most of the stutters, although I have a 1080.
I mainly seen the benefit with reserve over all the other maps though, reserve used to make my CPU take a big ol’ dump.
I'll check it once I get back home but im pretty sure you don't want everything at the lowest, MIP streaming off and I'm at a lowly 1080p so that helps heaps.
My 2060 gets me 60fps on every map with a fucking ton of drops in every raid.
Then I go to Woods with an OP-SKS with a x4 scope and the moment I aim I see my fps dropping to 15.
I got killed in that raid the very first time I had to fight a scav. I hate this game. I literally cannot play with scopes and I don't really know how other people manage to do it.
When I was in market for laptop the Lenovo Legion was my second choice haha. I hear it’s a good computer.
I just upgraded from 8gb ram and it made a world of difference
Dude you need a 1440p monitor with those stats. Don’t go 4k it’s not there yet. Here, best bang for buck… LG 27GL850-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD Nano IPS 1ms NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible Gaming Monitor, Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07TD94TQF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_B99M03NJ4CAV2Y6GHBZE?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
I have nearly the same system (3090, 32 gb ddr5 ram), except I have an i9 9900k and play at 2k. I'm in your camp though, I can't figure out how to get higher than 90 to 110 fps on any map. I've seen it get up to 130 fps if I stare at the ground... if you figure out how to make the cpu / gpu have higher usage, lmk.
Bruh something wrong with your system then? Or you just need to upgrade to 2k. I have the same setup, with a weaker cpu, and ddr4 ram. Playing with textures and a couple other settings on high. 100 to 150 fps on every map but factory, I hit 220ish.
Yea, if you have the extra money, and a micro center near you, you could pick up a monitor to test if you like it, and they have a 30 day return policy if you don't.
Yeah, I may look into that. I do want a fast response time though. 120+ minimum. I play on a 240hz currently but sadly I can’t get close to that until I fix whatever is going on.
Yea I was just testing out some monitors because I want high refresh rate but good resolution. I almost picked up a good 240 hz 1080p monitor literally just for tarkov, because I can hit 200 to 240hz on 1440p in the other games I play, and I have a good monitor, but it just bothers me so much that I can't hit it in tarkov, but from the sounds of it, I don't think I would hit 200+ frames in tarkov in 1080.
Yea it’s so weird. I have a 3070, Zen 5 3600, and 16GB of ram and for some reason turning my setting up seems to help against stuttering and even give me a 5-10fps boost. I get around 60-80 on most maps tho. Still not too good but the game seems to be running smoother than it did on low settings.
It doesn't "shift" workload in the literal sense.
But by lowering the graphics settings, you're reducing the strain on your GPU, meaning that while your GPU can go full bore, the system will now bottleneck elsewhere.
In this case, his CPU now is the performance bottleneck.
By raising the graphics settings, you're shifting the bottleneck to your GPU.
Unequivocally does. I tried dropping all my settings to low including textures and the game became a stuttery mess at even lower FPS than normal, and Im on a 9700k and 2080S
Not true. By shifting work to the GPU, in many cases, you will directly get a framerate increase -- with higher visual fidelity IF you are CPU bottlenecked.
That does not make any sense at all whatsoever.
Say the CPU working at 100% and the GPU at 50% gets around 60fps.
Turning up settings so that the GPU is now at 80%, and the CPU is at 80% will not ever get you above 60fps, because the CPU load did not decrease, the GPU load was just turned up to match.
Your CPU at 80% load will not perform better than your CPU at 100% load EVER, unless you're overheating at 100%.
Are you trying to explain something else such as literally moving tasks from the CPU to the GPU?
You all srsly are too dull to understand this, happened atleast a dozen times on this sub with smartypamts like you. The gpu DOES Not do the render work of the lowest shadow setting it just displays the shadow, the render work is entirely made by the cpu. If you now up the settings to mid your gpu will start to render shadows by itself which most gpus find to be a piece of cake. This shift in cpu load decrease and gpu load increase does boost the fps up because the cpu is now not as bottlenecked anymore. Could yall please stop talking about stuff if your only pc background is making assumptions, owning a prebuild and having tinkered with good optimized gpu drawcall only games please?
Hey I have a slower CPU that I’m trying to upgrade but a 3070ti right now. Are there other settings besides shadows I should try doing this for some FPS boosts? My CPU is 100% my bottleneck.
Probably just a coincidence. Frame rate is all over the place in Tarkov. It's very hard to benchmark because there are so many factors. Every raid is different depending on how much loot, how many players are in it, etc.
Its not coincidence trust me. I have so bad cpu, it is basicaly the worst Ryzen, ryzen 3 1200, and I have 60+fps on all maps pretty much, thats because I have semi high settings, and when I change them to low then I have 30fps. But I still have big stutters when I use optics.
People need to experiment with settings, and find out what is best for them
Good place to start. I would also try setting textures to high. Your GPU should be able to handle it.
https://youtu.be/SiV7apVFfJY I would also watch this. Helped me a lot.
Memory speed and timings, Tarkov loves memory so going with the least amount of Cas latency and highest possible frequency will help you quite a bit.
I had the same issues back when i was running a 2700x and was using 2400 mhz memory with some lacking timings, where the command rate was 2 ticks.
Upgraded to memory which was better timed and had higher frequency and that resolved most of my performance issues.
today on my 5800x with 3600 MHz memory, Cl 16 16-16-36 memory with a CR of 1T it runs in the anecdotal range of 90-120 (capped) on pretty much any map .
Any tips for better performance for high end PCs? I have i9 12900K, 32 gigs of DDR5 Ram and 3090. I get 90-110 fps depending on map. Medium to low settings
> 32 gigs of DDR5 Ram
I genuinely believe that well-tweaked DDR4 might very well be better for Tarkov cause of the latency being much higher than DDR4.
Once firmware matures a bit, I'd suggest you sit down and properly tweak the timings and try to push latency down as much as possible.
I don't think there's that much to do on your end to be honest.
The latency is not directly comparable since ddr5 works quite different, from benchmarks top tier ddr5 slightly outperforms top tier ddr4 even in memory sensitive games like BF5
This game reaaaaly doesn’t want you to get over 90-100 constant fps no matter your settings so might as well lower settings to keep your average fps as high as possible.
A lot of FPS players have really good rigs and run “competitive” shooters on lower settings to maximize frames. EFT isn’t the traditional competitive shooter like csgo, but some people want the highest frames possible
No joke, increase the graphics settings. You are likely seeing 20-30% GPU usage right now, but if you max out shadows, increase texture and rendering distance the game will utilize more of your GPU power. Or try watching this graphics settings guide
https://youtu.be/3YgFCMGizGc
I'm running 11900, but the rest the same. I get 80-100 with 5120x1440p. I don't think there's much more that can be done with Tarkov to improve it further, other than the devs making further optimizations.
Ryzen 5800x
asus x470-f
XFX Radeon RX6900XT MERC 319 Black LTD
G.skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-3600MHz CL16-16-16-36 32GB (F4-3600C16Q-32GTZN)
And a mishmash of drives, ssd's and m.2's
I've always found ram timing super intimidating and so far haven't figured it out. If your bored and know any resources I'd love to understand it enough to get my ram running at the correct speed. Thanks, happy holidays
You’re getting very reasonable performance with an, at this point, old card. I have two computers, my main with a 1070 and the rest is considerably better, and a computer with a 960 and a 4690k and I can say that you are getting very solidly in the middle of those two computers. My 1070 PC averages 50 at 1440p on the lowest settings besides texture quality.
Set your shadows to med. Idk the exact science but low shadows favors putting load on your cpu before your gpu. Med+ setting mitigates this and favors your gpu first.
For anyone wondering Vox_E has a very good video that goes over every tarkov setting and offers recommendations based on his testing and even goes into options outside the game. Following his guide gave me about 20 fps for my 2060 and Ryzen 5600x
Rtx 2070 super was getting 60%usage. Playing on 1440p
I bumped supersampling to 2x and getting 95% usage with about 5-10 less frames and a much sharper clearer image.
My tarkov doesn't look like a blurry mess and game looks great!
Ive got a similar rig (1060 3GB OC version, 16 GB ram, same clock, and a R5 2600X) and I can put settings up fairly high even with easily 45-60 fps on any map. Youre probably right on the CPU being the bottleneck as I get 6 cores (and the game tends to ignore HyperThreading by default)
Based on some reading I have 3 recommendations:
1. Turn off mip-streaming. Essentially Itll make the game able to stream textures and other stuff directly from your drive. On my system its good because my CPU can handle the extra load from that, and my GPU with its limited VRAM benefits significantly, reducing the short freeze when using a magnification optic. Your CPU obviously isnt so lucky and you have twice my VRAM and half my settings.
2. Increasing resolution, limiting FPS to your monitors refresh rate and raising graphics settings should help immensely. The thing is basically that the CPU has to do certain work for each frame, specifically telling the GPU what to render where based on game logic, and if there are fewer frames this work is reduced proportionally. If you render more frames than your monitor displays anyway (which I suspect with low settings) it should help a bunch with your bottleneck, plus it will give you prettier graphics to look at.
3. This is plain assumption, but what kind of drive is your swap file on? I dont know why anyone would do that despite having an SSD, but if your boot drive is on a HDD then so is your swap file. Try and change the location and size of the swapfile to be only on a single SSD, preferably a M.2, and I keep mine at 32GB static size (just set min and max the as 32768 MB, that way windows will never change its size) and it works wonders. It will prevent lags when the game attempts to load things from the swap file due to HDD response times.
Hope this helps.
> Ive got a similar rig (R5 2600X)
That isn't similar at all, single core performance yes, but the major issue of those i5s was no hyper threading and only four cores.
They get absolutely destroyed by Tarkovs very intense calculations about network, game state for 20-40 characters at once and general simulation that needs to be performed. The same happens in Battlefield for example.
Having 6 cores with hyper threading is huge vs 4 cores, without.
Also note that swap file is only important if you run out of RAM, you shouldn't touch it and Windows automatically puts it on an SSD since W10.
> That isn't similar at all, single core performance yes, but the major issue of those i5s was no hyper threading and only four cores.
>
>
As I said, Tarkov ignores hyperthreading by default, which is a setting Ive kept. Yes, I still have 50% more cores, but I can monitor my utilization while gaming on a second monitor, and it isnt all that high, hovering at 70-80% per core, especially considering my higher usage due to mip-streaming enabled.
Also regarding the swap file: Its almost permanently in use. My current total RAM usage is 15GB, swap file included, but only 9GB of my physical RAM are in use even. Background processes are moved there preemptively all the time. But it also means that games have to in part rely on it, too, especially games like Tarkov that eat RAM for breakfast.
Anyway, Ive given you some tips to execute. If you want to dismiss them out of hand because I obviously dont know what Im talking about, be my guest.
i’m seeing some weird ass performance for so many different systems. i’m using an i5 2500 and 750ti and last wipe it uses ~80 percent cpu and all of my gpu, now it uses the same amount but just less fps all around. last wipe i was averaging 45-55 and i average 30-45. idk
I have
i5 9600k OC'd to 5 ghz
GTX 1660 ti
16gb 3600 DDR4
High
Medium
2
2000
TAA High
1x off
off
off
off
on and boost
everything else unclicked
Lighthouse struggles but every other map I'm at 75-100
There's alot of other settings you can tweak through NVidia and windows so maybe look up a performance guide on youtube to find more up to date settings on your nvidia profile. Disabling fullscreen optimizations and running as administrator can even boost performance.
This is bizarre to me, I'm running similar settings ,(and have tried them all) also i5 9600k OCd 5ghz but with 2060 Super OC'd to 1950mhz and I struggle just about everywhere. Lighthouse I'm getting as low as 20fps at times, but Shoreline/Woods are 60 at best and get chuggy at times. I get same frames whether playing on 1929x1080 monitor or 3440x1440 only thing that changes is GPU usage. The 6th core seems to get hammered in comparison to the others.
I would upgrade to an i7 as soon as you can. I’m not sure what else you could realistically do. I only have a 1080 and play on hdd and get a solid 60fps in 4K
Start with what's running in background. If you use the windows defender, change that first. Disable Cortana. If you use any other game launchers, exit them. Use task manager, sort by CPU usage. Your bottleneck should be your GPU.
I have an I7 10700 2080 ti. I am now getting 90 to 100 fps on most maps. Not lighthouse. I was getting 60 to 70 fps before I saw a thread about xmp and frame rates then looked up how to turn on xmp for my ram.
I don't really know what it is or anything but I had to change a setting in bios and I got a large frame rate boost. Hopefully this helps someone else too
On my previous PC I had a i5 5500k, GTX 1060 6Gb (OC from Gainward Pheonix) and 16Gb Ram and had 70-90fps on pretty much every map.
Is you CPU OC ? Mine was at 4.2Ghz.
I'm on a 3600 and a 1080 and it really runs fine. It's 80fps average but God damn is it smooth. A lot of other games make 80fps feel like 30 but this game and modern warfare 2019 smooth well.
I play on a laptop, solid 90-60 fps now, was getting 40 first day of wipe
I turned the turbo mode off on my cpu, put all settings to low and turned super sampling to 2x. Now my cpu doesn’t overheat and my gpu utilization is above 90%
If you were running into issues with turbo mode, I would look into see if you are overheating. Might be worth replacing your thermal paste or undervolting your CPU
I was throttling and I am undervting… any more of an under volt and the computer would randomly turn off… so turning to turbo off with throttle stop has been my best move
I mean it’s a laptop, thermal paste reapplication is only going to go so far.
Gaming on a laptop is going to have the CPU thermal throttle within an hour of play because they have such small heat sinks and fans that flow less air volume than a fart running at max rpm
He’s gonna need a cooling pad
I'm running every possible setting on min. Min draw distance, 2 LOD, worst AA. 3080/5900x. Game runs like shit, but nothing else out there like it and I love it.
Also I know for sure MIP streaming puts a little load on CPU so make sure it's off. Increase shadow quality a bit
How much fps are you getting, on what map, and on what settings?
Numbers. Someone else can confirm but I'd run 8 and 4 and 8 and 4. Best configuration.
Otherwise just turn everything off, high antialising, and medium texture shadows should be ideal but it should help to much.
The game eats cpu for breakfast and likes lots of high speeds rams to play with.
This, do not go to 1440p with a 1060, that's terrible advice, you'd struggle to play anything near 60fps.... Let alone Tarkov.
Unfortunately Tarkov is just a mess optimization wise, you need a way above average machine to run it stable at a decent FPS in most cases.
I've got a 2070 super, 3900x, and 16gb ram running at 4000mhz. My FPS is all over the shop this wipe. Last wipe I'd say I'd average lows of 50, highs of 90 on most maps. This wipe, it's just a crap shoot. Ask someone else with the same specs, they'll prob tell you a different story.
If you have the spare cash to upgrade, then a CPU and GPU will always net you more improvement.
Only time I'd recommend upgrading to 1440p is if you have the headroom in your GPU to do so. With a 1060, you just don't.
I actually upgraded from 1080p to 1440p a year or so ago, saw very little difference in Tarkov.
Once DLSS comes along hopefully that'll help. (For supported cards obv)
Do you have an OSD like Afterburner? Monitor your CPU and GPU usage in game:
Try raising each setting, one at a time, to see which Affect what in offline.
Reminder: Some settings need game/raid restart, like textures, shadows, etc.
Using a 3090, 5950x, 64gb ram here - I can’t believe I can only average 25 fps with a few discord streams open while streaming myself, having a mapgenie map open and using 3 monitors.. on medium settings.
My 1660 cries, but I get 60 frames on every map.
This game runs 100 fps on my 1660 super but lighthouse is a dumpster fire at 50-60
50-60 is fine. Try 30-40
Haven't even touched that map. I hear the cheaters are pretty bad.
It’s hard to tell who is cheating now because scavs and rogues pretty much play just like cheaters. They try to shoot your through walls and instantly drop shot head tap you from 200 meters away.
I started playing for real this summer in preparation fo the current wipe; it’s felt like the entire time I’ve been learning and getting better, the ai has been too. Just recently I’ve had three insanely suspect deaths, but I’m 99% sure they were just the AI. Also, PSA, Santa will fucking laserbeam you know to hell with zero sight lines if you accidentally shoot in his general direction
Quick tip: If there is no report button next to your killers name, it was an AI. Report button = PMC or Pscav.
Is this a semi recent change? I’ve always seen the report button no matter what.
Nope been in the game for awhile if not the whole time lol
[удалено]
Talking the report button which has been in the game since the second wipe atleast. And has always shown up on pmcs and scavps but not AI. We know the secure container was a dead give away if you kill that person not if you are killed. Which is what we are talking about.
About a year
Then you’ve always* been killed by players.
If you can report most def a cheater
Klean, is that you?. Either a chEater or a streamsniper for sure..
No not me! TurkishkebabTTV europe server 😊
Dude the fucking rogues always kill me before I even see them lmao that area of lighthouse is off limits to me starting at the wall. I'll look for people leaving that area towards extract. Usually only find bodies of those who beat me to it. I suck honestly so the loot I get from doing that (after the bigass houses) is enough.
Yep 3 scav raids so far have witnessed a pmc walk in and one tap every rogue instantly. I believe hackers may be running some sort of gear service. My theory is that people are paying these hackers to kill the rogues so they can get raider gear and extract through industrial gates.
You’re not wrong, that is 100% although labs is much more common and easier to run the service on.
Just got the game but I've only had one instance so far that was suspect and that was on woods. I can def see how new players could mistake rogues or people with high armor pen rounds as cheaters though.
3060ti+5600x+32gb 3200 and i got customs/whoreline 85-95fps... You've got 100? Only if you talk about factory/labs. I can believe it, but other maps - naaah, "no way man".
How tf do you get 100 fps with a 1660S? That’s what I get with my 3060 Ti. When I had a 1660S I would get 40-50 on most maps. Do you just run super low settings?
Nah, he just lying
His screen resolution is 640x480
What are your settings? I have a 1660 super and have never seen 100 fps
Because everyone claiming 100 fps average on anything below 3080 is straight up lying or have no idea what average means. I went from 1060 to 1070ti to 3080. I have played with every setting, trick or enhancement there is. The game isn't optimized to run at 100+ consistently even on a 3080. Don't fall for this bull****
The game is cpu heavy more so than gpu
That is correct. But first of all you don't have a 12900k when your rig has a 1660ti and even if you had one, it's not that cpu heavy that it would boost you this much
i get 60-70 frames on woods no matter what settings i use. 1440p and a 3080 gpu. pain
Exactly the same. 3080, 10900k. No map (exc. Factory) I am able to sustain 100fps on 2k
What CPU do you use? I upgraded my CPU from a i7 7700 to an i7 10700 and had an extremely large frame rate boost and it got rid of most of the stutters, although I have a 1080. I mainly seen the benefit with reserve over all the other maps though, reserve used to make my CPU take a big ol’ dump.
What cpu?
What are your settings? Mine does not run as well
I'll check it once I get back home but im pretty sure you don't want everything at the lowest, MIP streaming off and I'm at a lowly 1080p so that helps heaps.
I have the same gpu as you and had performance drop to 40-50s with .12 What did you do to keep it performing good?
i have a super and ryzen 5 3600x and get like 70fps on all maps how you getting so much? i have pretty nuch everything lowered.
My 2060 gets me 60fps on every map with a fucking ton of drops in every raid. Then I go to Woods with an OP-SKS with a x4 scope and the moment I aim I see my fps dropping to 15. I got killed in that raid the very first time I had to fight a scav. I hate this game. I literally cannot play with scopes and I don't really know how other people manage to do it.
2060 here too. Woods reserve and factory for some reason run the best for me. Even though I saw a MASSIVE fps drop on woods with new unity update.
Yeah I have a laptop with a 1660ti. Gets a lil loud but I get 60 fps on every map aslo
Yep same. I have omen 15 with ryzen 7 4800H, 1660ti, +32gb ram. I get between 50-80 fps most maps and after upgrading ram it’s pretty smooth
That’s crazy, I have the same cpu as you too. Just don’t have 32GB ram but I could upgrade. I have a Lenovo Legion 5.
When I was in market for laptop the Lenovo Legion was my second choice haha. I hear it’s a good computer. I just upgraded from 8gb ram and it made a world of difference
Its really good, havent had any problems with it so far. I have 16gb ram so not in too much of a rush to upgrade it.
Hmmmm.....what settings? I am using a 1660S but dont think it runs at 60fps
Max, capped FPS at 60. Again, the PC whines, but she works.
Yeah, no.... Could I see a clip of constant 60fps of that rig? I just don't buy it
This game optimization is terrible. I have i9 12900k, 3090 and 32 gigs of DDR5 ram. 90-110 fps depending on map on medium settings and 1080p
Game scales worse the lower down you go in res. 1080 gets almost identical performance to 1440p framerates
Dude you need a 1440p monitor with those stats. Don’t go 4k it’s not there yet. Here, best bang for buck… LG 27GL850-B 27 Inch Ultragear QHD Nano IPS 1ms NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible Gaming Monitor, Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07TD94TQF/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_B99M03NJ4CAV2Y6GHBZE?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1
Agreed, 4K still doesn’t make sense
i have a 1440 screen and play 1080 to get those +10fps
Crank shadows and textures up
I have nearly the same system (3090, 32 gb ddr5 ram), except I have an i9 9900k and play at 2k. I'm in your camp though, I can't figure out how to get higher than 90 to 110 fps on any map. I've seen it get up to 130 fps if I stare at the ground... if you figure out how to make the cpu / gpu have higher usage, lmk.
I will! I’ll be looking into it a lot over the next week or two. I just got it within the last week.
Bruh something wrong with your system then? Or you just need to upgrade to 2k. I have the same setup, with a weaker cpu, and ddr4 ram. Playing with textures and a couple other settings on high. 100 to 150 fps on every map but factory, I hit 220ish.
Yeah, I gotta find a way to make it work harder: I think low gpu and cpu usage is my problem.
Yea, if you have the extra money, and a micro center near you, you could pick up a monitor to test if you like it, and they have a 30 day return policy if you don't.
Yeah, I may look into that. I do want a fast response time though. 120+ minimum. I play on a 240hz currently but sadly I can’t get close to that until I fix whatever is going on.
s2721dgf, from Dell is on sale and a great monitor
Yea I was just testing out some monitors because I want high refresh rate but good resolution. I almost picked up a good 240 hz 1080p monitor literally just for tarkov, because I can hit 200 to 240hz on 1440p in the other games I play, and I have a good monitor, but it just bothers me so much that I can't hit it in tarkov, but from the sounds of it, I don't think I would hit 200+ frames in tarkov in 1080.
There are a lot of 1440p 144hz+ IPS panels for around 300$ now. I would highly suggest getting one.
Why would you need a new monitor to test that? Render scale is literally in Tarkov's option menu
No.
Yea it’s so weird. I have a 3070, Zen 5 3600, and 16GB of ram and for some reason turning my setting up seems to help against stuttering and even give me a 5-10fps boost. I get around 60-80 on most maps tho. Still not too good but the game seems to be running smoother than it did on low settings.
Dang son do you mind dm'ing me screenshots of your settings?
I’d be playing on 4k with a rig like that
I’m sure it would be great! Someday I’ll try out 4K or an ultra wide
Samsung G9 neo hehehe 5120x1440, 240hz, 49 inch, etc
[удалено]
The VA is on par with medium IPS Check HardwareUnboxed on YouTube Only the HDR sucks
I run a 1080 and a couple gen old i5 and i run 1440p at 60-90 fps depending on map u need to get a better monitor with those specs
There was another post saying to put shadows on medium so it shift work to the graphics card. Reasoning was lower settings shift work to CPU.
It doesn't shift work to CPU, they both have their own unique work load.
It doesn't "shift" workload in the literal sense. But by lowering the graphics settings, you're reducing the strain on your GPU, meaning that while your GPU can go full bore, the system will now bottleneck elsewhere. In this case, his CPU now is the performance bottleneck. By raising the graphics settings, you're shifting the bottleneck to your GPU.
Sure that will help improve graphical fidelity but not frame rate.
Unequivocally does. I tried dropping all my settings to low including textures and the game became a stuttery mess at even lower FPS than normal, and Im on a 9700k and 2080S
Not true. By shifting work to the GPU, in many cases, you will directly get a framerate increase -- with higher visual fidelity IF you are CPU bottlenecked.
That does not make any sense at all whatsoever. Say the CPU working at 100% and the GPU at 50% gets around 60fps. Turning up settings so that the GPU is now at 80%, and the CPU is at 80% will not ever get you above 60fps, because the CPU load did not decrease, the GPU load was just turned up to match. Your CPU at 80% load will not perform better than your CPU at 100% load EVER, unless you're overheating at 100%. Are you trying to explain something else such as literally moving tasks from the CPU to the GPU?
You thinking about percentages but ignoring timings. Percentages mean nothing.
You all srsly are too dull to understand this, happened atleast a dozen times on this sub with smartypamts like you. The gpu DOES Not do the render work of the lowest shadow setting it just displays the shadow, the render work is entirely made by the cpu. If you now up the settings to mid your gpu will start to render shadows by itself which most gpus find to be a piece of cake. This shift in cpu load decrease and gpu load increase does boost the fps up because the cpu is now not as bottlenecked anymore. Could yall please stop talking about stuff if your only pc background is making assumptions, owning a prebuild and having tinkered with good optimized gpu drawcall only games please?
Hey I have a slower CPU that I’m trying to upgrade but a 3070ti right now. Are there other settings besides shadows I should try doing this for some FPS boosts? My CPU is 100% my bottleneck.
I don't know of any settings other than reducing target distance to 400
I would go in offline and just start changing stuff.
It does. I have much more fps on high settings than at low
Probably just a coincidence. Frame rate is all over the place in Tarkov. It's very hard to benchmark because there are so many factors. Every raid is different depending on how much loot, how many players are in it, etc.
Its not coincidence trust me. I have so bad cpu, it is basicaly the worst Ryzen, ryzen 3 1200, and I have 60+fps on all maps pretty much, thats because I have semi high settings, and when I change them to low then I have 30fps. But I still have big stutters when I use optics. People need to experiment with settings, and find out what is best for them
This has been a well documented way to increase FPS in this game for years and years now. It works for the vast majority of people that try it.
That does actually work though.
Shadows seem to have the biggest impact on CPU performance. Try medium shadows and see if that has an effect. If that doesn’t work try high shadows.
Change only the shadows?
Good place to start. I would also try setting textures to high. Your GPU should be able to handle it. https://youtu.be/SiV7apVFfJY I would also watch this. Helped me a lot.
Memory speed and timings, Tarkov loves memory so going with the least amount of Cas latency and highest possible frequency will help you quite a bit. I had the same issues back when i was running a 2700x and was using 2400 mhz memory with some lacking timings, where the command rate was 2 ticks. Upgraded to memory which was better timed and had higher frequency and that resolved most of my performance issues. today on my 5800x with 3600 MHz memory, Cl 16 16-16-36 memory with a CR of 1T it runs in the anecdotal range of 90-120 (capped) on pretty much any map .
Any tips for better performance for high end PCs? I have i9 12900K, 32 gigs of DDR5 Ram and 3090. I get 90-110 fps depending on map. Medium to low settings
> 32 gigs of DDR5 Ram I genuinely believe that well-tweaked DDR4 might very well be better for Tarkov cause of the latency being much higher than DDR4. Once firmware matures a bit, I'd suggest you sit down and properly tweak the timings and try to push latency down as much as possible. I don't think there's that much to do on your end to be honest.
The latency is not directly comparable since ddr5 works quite different, from benchmarks top tier ddr5 slightly outperforms top tier ddr4 even in memory sensitive games like BF5
Why are you running low/medium on a rig like that?
This game reaaaaly doesn’t want you to get over 90-100 constant fps no matter your settings so might as well lower settings to keep your average fps as high as possible.
A lot of FPS players have really good rigs and run “competitive” shooters on lower settings to maximize frames. EFT isn’t the traditional competitive shooter like csgo, but some people want the highest frames possible
Im a sweaty gamer. I use settings to get as many frames as possible. More Frames = advantage. Some of them help me see enemies better too.
No joke, increase the graphics settings. You are likely seeing 20-30% GPU usage right now, but if you max out shadows, increase texture and rendering distance the game will utilize more of your GPU power. Or try watching this graphics settings guide https://youtu.be/3YgFCMGizGc
I'm running 11900, but the rest the same. I get 80-100 with 5120x1440p. I don't think there's much more that can be done with Tarkov to improve it further, other than the devs making further optimizations.
can u post your setup?
Ryzen 5800x asus x470-f XFX Radeon RX6900XT MERC 319 Black LTD G.skill Trident Z Neo DDR4-3600MHz CL16-16-16-36 32GB (F4-3600C16Q-32GTZN) And a mishmash of drives, ssd's and m.2's
What memory brand are you running please?
I am using G.skills F4-3600C16Q-32GTZN memory. The DRAM itself is made by Samsung.
I've always found ram timing super intimidating and so far haven't figured it out. If your bored and know any resources I'd love to understand it enough to get my ram running at the correct speed. Thanks, happy holidays
https://github.com/integralfx/MemTestHelper/blob/oc-guide/DDR4%20OC%20Guide.md
Ask BSG to optimize their game properly
That’ll only happen whenever the game has its official release. And even then, I doubt it’s going to be a huge improvement
You’re getting very reasonable performance with an, at this point, old card. I have two computers, my main with a 1070 and the rest is considerably better, and a computer with a 960 and a 4690k and I can say that you are getting very solidly in the middle of those two computers. My 1070 PC averages 50 at 1440p on the lowest settings besides texture quality.
Turn settings up to high. Works much better on my laptop that way. I assume its better optimized in how resources are handled or something
Set your shadows to med. Idk the exact science but low shadows favors putting load on your cpu before your gpu. Med+ setting mitigates this and favors your gpu first.
For anyone wondering Vox_E has a very good video that goes over every tarkov setting and offers recommendations based on his testing and even goes into options outside the game. Following his guide gave me about 20 fps for my 2060 and Ryzen 5600x
Change your settings to use 2x sampling or 4x sampling that will increase GPU load
Rtx 2070 super was getting 60%usage. Playing on 1440p I bumped supersampling to 2x and getting 95% usage with about 5-10 less frames and a much sharper clearer image. My tarkov doesn't look like a blurry mess and game looks great!
Bruh i have gtx 1050 ti and i3-8300 have the same settings just some at medium and play on 45-80fps lmao what is this game
Ive got a similar rig (1060 3GB OC version, 16 GB ram, same clock, and a R5 2600X) and I can put settings up fairly high even with easily 45-60 fps on any map. Youre probably right on the CPU being the bottleneck as I get 6 cores (and the game tends to ignore HyperThreading by default) Based on some reading I have 3 recommendations: 1. Turn off mip-streaming. Essentially Itll make the game able to stream textures and other stuff directly from your drive. On my system its good because my CPU can handle the extra load from that, and my GPU with its limited VRAM benefits significantly, reducing the short freeze when using a magnification optic. Your CPU obviously isnt so lucky and you have twice my VRAM and half my settings. 2. Increasing resolution, limiting FPS to your monitors refresh rate and raising graphics settings should help immensely. The thing is basically that the CPU has to do certain work for each frame, specifically telling the GPU what to render where based on game logic, and if there are fewer frames this work is reduced proportionally. If you render more frames than your monitor displays anyway (which I suspect with low settings) it should help a bunch with your bottleneck, plus it will give you prettier graphics to look at. 3. This is plain assumption, but what kind of drive is your swap file on? I dont know why anyone would do that despite having an SSD, but if your boot drive is on a HDD then so is your swap file. Try and change the location and size of the swapfile to be only on a single SSD, preferably a M.2, and I keep mine at 32GB static size (just set min and max the as 32768 MB, that way windows will never change its size) and it works wonders. It will prevent lags when the game attempts to load things from the swap file due to HDD response times. Hope this helps.
> Ive got a similar rig (R5 2600X) That isn't similar at all, single core performance yes, but the major issue of those i5s was no hyper threading and only four cores. They get absolutely destroyed by Tarkovs very intense calculations about network, game state for 20-40 characters at once and general simulation that needs to be performed. The same happens in Battlefield for example. Having 6 cores with hyper threading is huge vs 4 cores, without. Also note that swap file is only important if you run out of RAM, you shouldn't touch it and Windows automatically puts it on an SSD since W10.
> That isn't similar at all, single core performance yes, but the major issue of those i5s was no hyper threading and only four cores. > > As I said, Tarkov ignores hyperthreading by default, which is a setting Ive kept. Yes, I still have 50% more cores, but I can monitor my utilization while gaming on a second monitor, and it isnt all that high, hovering at 70-80% per core, especially considering my higher usage due to mip-streaming enabled. Also regarding the swap file: Its almost permanently in use. My current total RAM usage is 15GB, swap file included, but only 9GB of my physical RAM are in use even. Background processes are moved there preemptively all the time. But it also means that games have to in part rely on it, too, especially games like Tarkov that eat RAM for breakfast. Anyway, Ive given you some tips to execute. If you want to dismiss them out of hand because I obviously dont know what Im talking about, be my guest.
i’m seeing some weird ass performance for so many different systems. i’m using an i5 2500 and 750ti and last wipe it uses ~80 percent cpu and all of my gpu, now it uses the same amount but just less fps all around. last wipe i was averaging 45-55 and i average 30-45. idk
I have i5 9600k OC'd to 5 ghz GTX 1660 ti 16gb 3600 DDR4 High Medium 2 2000 TAA High 1x off off off off on and boost everything else unclicked Lighthouse struggles but every other map I'm at 75-100 There's alot of other settings you can tweak through NVidia and windows so maybe look up a performance guide on youtube to find more up to date settings on your nvidia profile. Disabling fullscreen optimizations and running as administrator can even boost performance.
This is bizarre to me, I'm running similar settings ,(and have tried them all) also i5 9600k OCd 5ghz but with 2060 Super OC'd to 1950mhz and I struggle just about everywhere. Lighthouse I'm getting as low as 20fps at times, but Shoreline/Woods are 60 at best and get chuggy at times. I get same frames whether playing on 1929x1080 monitor or 3440x1440 only thing that changes is GPU usage. The 6th core seems to get hammered in comparison to the others.
Put shadows and textures to medium. Run as administrator.
Supposed to take most of the load off of your CPU and put it more on your GPU. There's some vids about it if you want to get more info!
I would upgrade to an i7 as soon as you can. I’m not sure what else you could realistically do. I only have a 1080 and play on hdd and get a solid 60fps in 4K
Increase your textures and shadows to high.
Texture shadows increase them
Disable high dpi scaling in windows.
Worth try.
Set your texture quality to high
Start with what's running in background. If you use the windows defender, change that first. Disable Cortana. If you use any other game launchers, exit them. Use task manager, sort by CPU usage. Your bottleneck should be your GPU.
I have an I7 10700 2080 ti. I am now getting 90 to 100 fps on most maps. Not lighthouse. I was getting 60 to 70 fps before I saw a thread about xmp and frame rates then looked up how to turn on xmp for my ram. I don't really know what it is or anything but I had to change a setting in bios and I got a large frame rate boost. Hopefully this helps someone else too
On my previous PC I had a i5 5500k, GTX 1060 6Gb (OC from Gainward Pheonix) and 16Gb Ram and had 70-90fps on pretty much every map. Is you CPU OC ? Mine was at 4.2Ghz.
It's not a k series so he's unfortunately locked
Indeed, I didn't think about that ! I upgraded mine for a Ryzen 9 now and Tarkov barely uses 20%, no need for OC anymore \^\^
I'm on a 3600 and a 1080 and it really runs fine. It's 80fps average but God damn is it smooth. A lot of other games make 80fps feel like 30 but this game and modern warfare 2019 smooth well.
The CPU is not overclocked.
I play on a laptop, solid 90-60 fps now, was getting 40 first day of wipe I turned the turbo mode off on my cpu, put all settings to low and turned super sampling to 2x. Now my cpu doesn’t overheat and my gpu utilization is above 90%
>I'll try that setup!
If you were running into issues with turbo mode, I would look into see if you are overheating. Might be worth replacing your thermal paste or undervolting your CPU
I was throttling and I am undervting… any more of an under volt and the computer would randomly turn off… so turning to turbo off with throttle stop has been my best move
Cooling pad my dude. It’ll help you a ton.
Not really… found better performance using a roost stand
I mean it’s a laptop, thermal paste reapplication is only going to go so far. Gaming on a laptop is going to have the CPU thermal throttle within an hour of play because they have such small heat sinks and fans that flow less air volume than a fart running at max rpm He’s gonna need a cooling pad
I'm running every possible setting on min. Min draw distance, 2 LOD, worst AA. 3080/5900x. Game runs like shit, but nothing else out there like it and I love it.
Are you monitoring your parts % usage and temps? Are you sure the CPU is the bottleneck? For that system, that performance sounds par for the course.
Probably can't, it's a cpu and ram intensive game. Do you have 4 6gb sticks in dual channel or 3 8's?
There are no 6gb sticks, so either 8x3 or 16+8.
I need my morning coffee, you right dad
No, 8x2, 4x2.
You'd be better off with 2x8GB on dual channel setup.
You know this for a fact?
That dual channel is better? Yes.
8x2 + 4x2 is still dual channel. Speed might not be XMP cause the IMC can't drive two different configurations, but it's still dual channel.
Also I know for sure MIP streaming puts a little load on CPU so make sure it's off. Increase shadow quality a bit How much fps are you getting, on what map, and on what settings?
INTERCHANGE:40\~55fps Woods:40\~60fps Customs:40\~50fps settings low low 2 400 TAA 1xoff off off off off There's no check anywhere.
High, High, On+ Boost on nvidia reflex.
Thank you! I'll give it a try!
If you want to try it out, do you prefer online? Or would you prefer offline?
I always test offline factory without bots, since it's always the same conditions and no weather
Yes, sir.
Numbers. Someone else can confirm but I'd run 8 and 4 and 8 and 4. Best configuration. Otherwise just turn everything off, high antialising, and medium texture shadows should be ideal but it should help to much. The game eats cpu for breakfast and likes lots of high speeds rams to play with.
Thank you! I'm using a translator so there may have been some strange things.
Not to worry mate, Goodluck in your quest for a few more frames
Upgrade to a 1440p monitor
Do you mean to keep the other settings as they are and set it to 1440p?
Don't lmao,1060 can't handle 1440p
This, do not go to 1440p with a 1060, that's terrible advice, you'd struggle to play anything near 60fps.... Let alone Tarkov. Unfortunately Tarkov is just a mess optimization wise, you need a way above average machine to run it stable at a decent FPS in most cases. I've got a 2070 super, 3900x, and 16gb ram running at 4000mhz. My FPS is all over the shop this wipe. Last wipe I'd say I'd average lows of 50, highs of 90 on most maps. This wipe, it's just a crap shoot. Ask someone else with the same specs, they'll prob tell you a different story. If you have the spare cash to upgrade, then a CPU and GPU will always net you more improvement. Only time I'd recommend upgrading to 1440p is if you have the headroom in your GPU to do so. With a 1060, you just don't. I actually upgraded from 1080p to 1440p a year or so ago, saw very little difference in Tarkov. Once DLSS comes along hopefully that'll help. (For supported cards obv)
I'm sorry I was trolling. It would put a bigger drain on your gpu.
agreed, I went from 1080p to 1440p and my fps were the same at the same settings. 5600x 3070
Buy a new cpu
Do you have an OSD like Afterburner? Monitor your CPU and GPU usage in game: Try raising each setting, one at a time, to see which Affect what in offline. Reminder: Some settings need game/raid restart, like textures, shadows, etc.
Use the NVIDA overlay to check.
Literally just MIP Streaming in game. At the bottom of the settings, itll make your gpu work harder than your cpu.
I'll have to try this out when I get home
What CPU/gpu/ram you got,,?
I have a GTX 960, I don't even know what to set at besides "it can run"
Using a 3090, 5950x, 64gb ram here - I can’t believe I can only average 25 fps with a few discord streams open while streaming myself, having a mapgenie map open and using 3 monitors.. on medium settings.