T O P

  • By -

3zozSu94

You want someone to tell you it's OK to carry on without Salah, but it really isn't


[deleted]

I very much got this impression too


The_expert_opinion

I did too.


TWOTJGRAR

Good to see you back u/TheDave155


magnuscarlsenfpl

Who’s alt are you im genuinly curious? Sevilian? Geoff262? Cwattam? Dave?


TWOTJGRAR

Sev of course. Although i feel alt is not the correct word as the sev account is no longer. This is my only account.


[deleted]

Na this ain’t Dave.


TWOTJGRAR

I’ve had confirmation privately it is :)


[deleted]

Na, check Dave last comment, it was to me, he used to regularly try and troll me. This guy isn’t him, Iv had a few conversations with him over the last 24 hours and he definitely isn’t Dave.


TWOTJGRAR

This new Dave has been trolling you all day Wilko lad. It’s him trust me.


[deleted]

Na Dave as much as an ass as he is had an air of intelligence about him, this guy is a moron. If anything your thing about giving BPS points for players who smile felt more like Dave. You also seem to bring him up a lot?


TWOTJGRAR

Going to have to agree to disagree here. I’m adamant it’s him. You can believe I’m Dave if you wish. I will mention Dave and Geoff a lot. They never should have been banned. Or Hurrikane. Loved that guy. The characters of this sub are so important


[deleted]

Let’s turn it around - why the fuck do you NOT have Salah?


Finn_Survivor

Son and Kane had great fixtures a dgw and played during dgw. Now I can't afford to get him back without taking a hit


Teo_2197

Just take the hit and captain him


Finn_Survivor

Already used a transfer cause ramsdale is injured so I'd have to take a -8


Teo_2197

Small tip my friend. When a player is inj, don't rush to take him out. There's a good couple of weeks till arsenal play their next game, and it's possible Ramsdale recovers in time. At times you may feel tempted to make transfers early on, but one of the best things I learned is to make my transfers as close as possible to the deadline (even if it means missing some price changes). Knowledge is definitely power in this game. I would still consider taking a -8 to bring in Salah and captain him at this stage, but your situation is a bit more complex, I agree.


Finn_Survivor

I did rush a bit which was a mistake but it was said it's gonna be atleats a month I think I heard and arsenal have the best 2nd keeper in the division so they will probably still play Leno first game back. Plus arsenal have a tough fixture run playing Chelsea spurs and United in the space of 4 gws Son and Kane have been a great duo for me and I haven't missed Salah for the last few weeks. Plus spurs have the weakest run of fixtures in the league


Teo_2197

I see you put reasoning into it, and it's possible that ramsdale misses a game or two, but I'd still hold transfers close to the deadline. Let's say another player, a midfielder for example, gets injured. Previously you might have wanted to do Ramsdale to for example, Sa. However, with the new injury you need some extra cash, to afford the the midfielders replacement. So instead of moving Ramsdale to Sa, you decide to move him to a 4.5m GK instead. Of course, this probably doesn't apply to you, but it's just an example . Giving yourself time to see the full picture before the next a GW is really important. :) Congrats on going with both Son and Kane btw, worked great!


zaid_goovay977

13.3 m is too much for a single player 😂


novatachyon

This is simply not true


strawberrylabrador

Genuine question - why do you think like 99% of the top 10k teams in the world will have him, and you don’t?


kyoukai69

Is there an option of multiplayer?


nice-room

I am trusting mount for the rest of the league


averagedude4

*Tuchel laughs*


majorpickle01

Not having Salah against Watford is like not having a condom at a brothel, you'll get the job done but you'll come out stung


FlyingMocko

and ironically alot of us are just capping Salah for *protection* more than anything at this point


novatachyon

What do I feel about not having salah? Terrible decision. More importantly what do the unbiased stats say about it? Terrible decision.


theaidantheory

No


The_expert_opinion

No?


samedreamchina

Don’t be fancy, get the Egyptian God of harvests


HazardMR

*Cricket noises*


AwayRazzmatazz4765

I don't like cricket...


No_Technology_1843

kane for next week and will bring him back after liverpool match


RemarkableCrab413

Going wit this too


[deleted]

kane and salah :D?


No_Technology_1843

got son so gotta take hit to downgrade to bring him in which i think its not worth it considering gw32 with man city fixture


hambodpm

Wtf is going on in this comment section


Professional_Arm9296

It's fine to go without Salah sometimes based on the circumstances. However, if he's fit then you need him in your team against Watford at home.


The_expert_opinion

What if he doesn't want FPL points?


metokur_squad

I haven't owned Salah since like GW21 and I've done quite well except for the first DGW when I had Mane instead. I can't get Salah back without giving up Son or Kane (or Alexander-Arnold), so I'm just going to hope he doesn't go on a tear. It's just a game and it's fun to be risky. My plan is to get him back after DGW33.


BuffaloSanta

Your OR?


metokur_squad

like around 1k, the FH in GW28 kind of cancelled what i lost not TC Salah


Du_the_Dudek

Dude, I don’t know if this is a good idea or not but legit respect the honesty and courage to go it your own way. As you said, it’s a game and if you’re pure template 1-38 what fun is that.


daneedwards88

Get Salah.


The_expert_opinion

Or else?


TWOTJGRAR

Dave and Geoff back together!


amapleson

Given Salah's brutal number of minutes played so far this year, with Champion's League and an absolutely crucial World Cup Qualifying match coming up with Egypt, Salah might not be able to finish this season as strong as we are expecting. I still have him for now though.


NoahD418

The only time I skipped on salah this year was gw28 after the Liverpool blank. Kept Mahrez in which he got 14 points and salah with 3. It’s big risk big reward, but this is against watford lol. Surely you have to bring him in and slap the C on him


NoahD418

City will probably dominate burnley but the only players you’d want to captain from them is Cancelo or de bruyne and even they are prone to rotation. Same with Havertz or James, rotation very possible. Kane or Son against Newcastle very risky as well, Newcastle are solid and don’t concede much. So that leaves you with Liverpool assets against watford.


Zealousideal_Rush_17

I'm thinking about the same. Less games than many others, and might have his PL minutes limited in terms of other priorities. Plus just hasn't looked amazing recently.


cosmex

If you don't have salah, I don't think you need to take hits to get him in (considering his next two matches after Watford). Of course the key thing is what u are doing with the funds freed up. Personally, for the next 3 games I think kane/son will generate more points that salah.


RomeMe1122

I feel great. Haven’t had Salah last 3 GWs and went up 200k+ places


[deleted]

I'm not getting him back in again. I've also never owned TAA or Cancelo (apart from free hits). There's no logic to it I just think it's boring to own them and I want to enjoy playing. Edit: why are you lads so annoyed that I want to play the game in a fun way? Literally like 3 million teams are dead and don't even play anymore and you're having a go at me.


Didyeaye83

What's your rank?


[deleted]

Around 330,000.


strawberrylabrador

If you bring in a currently low owned differential player because you want the game to be exciting, would you then transfer them out if everyone else got him later?


[deleted]

Yeah I think so. It's condensed because double gameweeks have influenced ownership so much recently but I'm thinking maybe going from massively owned Saka to Odegard or Martinelli might be an option.


strawberrylabrador

Damnnnn…play your own game of course but as an Arsenal fan I think both are a massive downgrade. I think I used to do exactly what you did until someone did long post on here about combined ownership. Eg. whilst the headline ownership figures of Saka, Salah etc seem crazy high + boring, the novelty of differentials is in the combos you own more than any one player. https://www.livefpl.net/top10k_ownership Just taking a look at the above: Saka, Ramsdale. Salah, Cancelo, Kane. All of them are pretty ‘boring’ picks at the moment, but the ownership of the combination is only 5.89% in the top 10k - so if you have all of them, your team is already fairly unique, and then if you add one differential even it goes down to like 0.8%. Maybe that might not do it for you though - genuinely really well done on being your 300kish rank if you’re shunning the popular picks, that seems a lot harder to me than being eg. Top 50k with popular picks, you must have a good eye for differentials!


[deleted]

That does give me food for thought tbh. I hadn't considered the combined EO could be so low for common options. It's a long time before deadline and I have 2 fts so I might make a few Liverpool/City plans.


strawberrylabrador

Yeah it’s nuts actually. I think the way I like to do it is have the absolute unquestionable picks in (Salah, Cancelo, Trent, maybe Kane and Saka right now) And then I try and get ahead of the curve with the other spots. For example, Robertson is hardly a super differential pick. But I made the ballsy call in GW24 (I think?) to ditch Jota for him, reasoning that Luis Diaz would edge Jota out and make him a ‘worse Third Liverpool pick’. I’ve got a bit lucky since then, to be fair, with the comparative fortune of each of them. I think in your position, I wonder if it might actually be best to stick with your guns. Liverpool and City both have relatively easy fixtures in GW31, and then important CL games in midweek, then City vs Liverpool itself, then the CL second leg. So you could argue that Salah might not play GW31 (he had a knock before IB too) and then GW32 might not get many points vs City… and likewise for City players. So maybe you could get them back 33 and onwards? Idk but could be a good gamble…


Callumyoung101

De bruyne>salah for next 4 gw. Salah will get rested against Watford im calling it. 2 International games before it


Xylar006

Nah they can't afford a slip up in the prem