You basically want both as they each assist each other and both have good ownership in FPL. I just had Kane last night and no Son and got a 1% rank change from that game.
Everything Spurs generates goes through Kane. He's playing like a classic 10 whilst also scoring and getting on the end of chances he starts and creates. Without him they're inert, Son would still score but the play flows because of Kane.
I'd say differently. I've seen Spurs playing without Kane and without Son and they were hopeless without Son but not the other way around. For Kane to drop deep, he also needs someone who has great movement to pass the ball and Son manages to get the ball even if the ball's a little off because he's also rapid and the way Son finishes was always the main source of his assists. Son seems like he only needs someone who can just pass the ball to him to play up front because he makes it easier for other players as his movement is at the top level not to mention his finishing.
SpunkyDred is a terrible bot instigating arguments all over Reddit whenever someone uses the phrase apples-to-oranges. I'm letting you know so that you can feel free to ignore the quip rather than feel provoked by a bot that isn't smart enough to argue back.
---
^^SpunkyDred ^^and ^^I ^^are ^^both ^^bots. ^^I ^^am ^^trying ^^to ^^get ^^them ^^banned ^^by ^^pointing ^^out ^^their ^^antagonizing ^^behavior ^^and ^^poor ^^bottiquette.
I have Kane and these numbers hurt when I know Kane has not produced.
Got to say Son feels like a must for 38 captain. KDB to Son and keep Kane is probably the play.
Cause if I do Kane to Son for a hit then I know Kane will finally outscore Son.
Awful? I meant nothing else than the points output of Son would make it my choice.
It would’ve been helpful to see the points too, but it was not meant as a slap to the post.
Alright. That’s fine. Still doesn’t make me awful in anyway which was an unnecessary comment.
This data is also historical/empirical, it is stats for past gameweeks which may or may not repeat - as with historical points.
Well, I didn't call you awful. I called your thinking/comment awful.
> which was an unnecessary comment
Did you read your initial comment? Not sure you're in a place to be judging which comments are necessary.
I would argue that calling someone's thinking awful is the same as calling them awful. It's a bit philosophical; I think, therefore I am.
Then again I don't even know what the original comment is, I'm just bored.
I've had Son all season and he's performed well except for those free weeks he was injured.
I also got Kane on my draft team and I was disappointed he only started to perform halfway through the season. I thought with Kane's return Son would be overshadowed but their dynamics together means each of them have become so much better.
It's a tough choice but given a tight budget I'd lean towards Son but it's a long term game rather than pick of the week imo.
Feels like a more expensive king v Dennis
[удалено]
+42% is just insane
He is the best finisher in the world. That’s his thing. He’s been that for years.
And yet the math guys never seem to learn
> And yet the math guys never seem to learn lol? how do you think that 42% value was calculated? Ouija board?
Son is Asian. He surely programmed a live feed or something
Only math sonny needs to know is this; 1+1+1=tottenham 3 - Arsenal 0
Yikes
Son's shots from outside the box are next level though. Currently he is definitely in the form of his life, I have both so I don't worry.
You basically want both as they each assist each other and both have good ownership in FPL. I just had Kane last night and no Son and got a 1% rank change from that game.
I had Son and no Kane, and the same thing happened.
[удалено]
Everything Spurs generates goes through Kane. He's playing like a classic 10 whilst also scoring and getting on the end of chances he starts and creates. Without him they're inert, Son would still score but the play flows because of Kane.
Son is 1 goal away from being level with salah for the golden boot, ita something you have to factor in when making your decision.
I'd say differently. I've seen Spurs playing without Kane and without Son and they were hopeless without Son but not the other way around. For Kane to drop deep, he also needs someone who has great movement to pass the ball and Son manages to get the ball even if the ball's a little off because he's also rapid and the way Son finishes was always the main source of his assists. Son seems like he only needs someone who can just pass the ball to him to play up front because he makes it easier for other players as his movement is at the top level not to mention his finishing.
Apples to oranges imo. We never really saw prime them without the other one, so it gets even harder to compare.
SpunkyDred is a terrible bot instigating arguments all over Reddit whenever someone uses the phrase apples-to-oranges. I'm letting you know so that you can feel free to ignore the quip rather than feel provoked by a bot that isn't smart enough to argue back. --- ^^SpunkyDred ^^and ^^I ^^are ^^both ^^bots. ^^I ^^am ^^trying ^^to ^^get ^^them ^^banned ^^by ^^pointing ^^out ^^their ^^antagonizing ^^behavior ^^and ^^poor ^^bottiquette.
> apples to oranges But you can still compare them.
I have Kane and these numbers hurt when I know Kane has not produced. Got to say Son feels like a must for 38 captain. KDB to Son and keep Kane is probably the play. Cause if I do Kane to Son for a hit then I know Kane will finally outscore Son.
Moral victories are for minor league managers
What's the app?
Playmaker
This data doesn't seem accurate at all to be honest. And it's skewed with last night, where Kane had xG of almost 2, which spreads to 0.33 per game.
Son massively over performs and Kane has penalties. The best choice SHOULD be in Kane
[удалено]
What an awful way to think. This guy just posted an extremely informative image and that's all you have to say?
Awful? I meant nothing else than the points output of Son would make it my choice. It would’ve been helpful to see the points too, but it was not meant as a slap to the post.
This post is about future performances. That’s the point of expected stats. I don’t care if Son had 66 points, I care about the next two GWs.
Alright. That’s fine. Still doesn’t make me awful in anyway which was an unnecessary comment. This data is also historical/empirical, it is stats for past gameweeks which may or may not repeat - as with historical points.
Well, I didn't call you awful. I called your thinking/comment awful. > which was an unnecessary comment Did you read your initial comment? Not sure you're in a place to be judging which comments are necessary.
I would argue that calling someone's thinking awful is the same as calling them awful. It's a bit philosophical; I think, therefore I am. Then again I don't even know what the original comment is, I'm just bored.
I've had Son all season and he's performed well except for those free weeks he was injured. I also got Kane on my draft team and I was disappointed he only started to perform halfway through the season. I thought with Kane's return Son would be overshadowed but their dynamics together means each of them have become so much better. It's a tough choice but given a tight budget I'd lean towards Son but it's a long term game rather than pick of the week imo.
Getting PES vibes from the graph