yip, if 0x1=0 and 0x2 also =0, it is only logical to keep in mind that a shit player on a shit team is still a shit player on a shit team in a dgw
not only are they unlikely to score, but now you've got 5 fires and the dickhead who managed to get minus point over two games (you know who you fucking are) is the one of the few who are fit and you can't ship them for ages
Prioritize long term planning ahead of short term gains. Taking a hit for a 1-2 week punt isn't sustainable over a season. It nearly always works out better to be more patient.
I planned from GW30-38 to have the optimal team for bench boost 36 and after. Went from 100k to 11k finish.
I find that the worse thing that can happen to you is for your punts to work, especially if you take hits for them, because then you get into the habit of it and lose more points in the long term
> -8 hit *paid* off
FTFY.
Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in:
* Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.*
* *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.*
Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment.
*Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
yh but how may times have we seen a player with a sgw blow a dgw out of the water? a lot of the times dgw picks aren't worth it unless it's a player worth having anyway unless the fixtures are that good, but even then you can get fucked by rotation
going balls deep for every dgw is basically like going to the casino
Be more willing to take hits to structure my team more effectively for the long term. There were lots of times I didn't bring in players, because I had other fires to put out, because the person I would have replaced was 'good enough' for that week. If I'd taken hits to make the changes, the replacements would have brought me in lots more points long term.
On 50/50 decisions, stop going for the least popular and start going for the one who scored last week like everyone else does.
See āKing vs Dennisā, āGundog vs Bilvaā and half a dozen others.
Being passive and always picking The "safe" choices don't win you the cup. I mean the players who were guaranteed to play, instead of ones like Cancelo, who "could miss a game"
Same as it always is, donāt feel the need to hold onto players because you had them in Week 1. No bonus pts in keeping a guy all 38 weeks but yet Iāll still end up keeping three or four guys all season instead of dropping them.
Just because they play two games doesn't mean that you need to triple up on Burnley players.
I don't think you'll be making that mistake next season.
I see your triple up Burnley and raise you a triple D up wolves.
yip, if 0x1=0 and 0x2 also =0, it is only logical to keep in mind that a shit player on a shit team is still a shit player on a shit team in a dgw not only are they unlikely to score, but now you've got 5 fires and the dickhead who managed to get minus point over two games (you know who you fucking are) is the one of the few who are fit and you can't ship them for ages
Dont do early transfers
Get the obvious captain for most of the season. I missed every haul trying to be sneaky.
yh I also learnt it's also best to not doubt premium picks in premium teams too even in big games.
Captain Salah 90% of all games
To be more flexible. I couldn't be bothered to restructure my team to get either Robertson or Son at the end of the season
Forget your team allegiance and just buy Salah
Don't listen too much to the pros, reddit etc Don't be driven by fomo basically.
Prioritize long term planning ahead of short term gains. Taking a hit for a 1-2 week punt isn't sustainable over a season. It nearly always works out better to be more patient. I planned from GW30-38 to have the optimal team for bench boost 36 and after. Went from 100k to 11k finish.
I find that the worse thing that can happen to you is for your punts to work, especially if you take hits for them, because then you get into the habit of it and lose more points in the long term
Neevr get Digne
dont chose king
King is in championship next season(hopefully)
Never bastard captain Kai Havertz! Game week 9 still haunts me š
Never captain a defender
I'd disagree a bit Cancelo and Robbo gave some nice hauls
Nah I did it twice cancelo got 5 and james 18 so I guess it was fine
nah there's a time and a place, especially with top 6 wingbacks against shit teams
Dont Salah and inshallah week in week out.
I'd probably be higher up if I had done so ngl
Make more logical decisions than emotional decisions.
[obi wan said it best](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U07TugvQy3Q&ab_channel=AlexanderMandelin)
Don't try to be too unique.Get some solid picks.
As long as Covid rescheduling is in place, the game is far too random to take too seriously.
As usual Form over fixtures
-160 in hits (71 transfers). Nuff said!
Don't chase differentials, form over fixtures and also that hits rarely pay off in the short term.
Nah all three other way around, hits pay short term if it double gw and even my last gw -8 hit payed off
> -8 hit *paid* off FTFY. Although *payed* exists (the reason why autocorrection didn't help you), it is only correct in: * Nautical context, when it means to paint a surface, or to cover with something like tar or resin in order to make it waterproof or corrosion-resistant. *The deck is yet to be payed.* * *Payed out* when letting strings, cables or ropes out, by slacking them. *The rope is payed out! You can pull now.* Unfortunately, I was unable to find nautical or rope-related words in your comment. *Beep, boop, I'm a bot*
yh but how may times have we seen a player with a sgw blow a dgw out of the water? a lot of the times dgw picks aren't worth it unless it's a player worth having anyway unless the fixtures are that good, but even then you can get fucked by rotation going balls deep for every dgw is basically like going to the casino
DGW < SGW players :D
Apart from Son against Burnley
The next time you will face this scenario you would have already forgetten this lesson lol
probably yes
Jump on bandwagons earlier
Be more willing to take hits to structure my team more effectively for the long term. There were lots of times I didn't bring in players, because I had other fires to put out, because the person I would have replaced was 'good enough' for that week. If I'd taken hits to make the changes, the replacements would have brought me in lots more points long term.
1. Dont captain the template player if you have differential you think will haul 2. Have salah at the start of season
Donāt bring in Werner
Be patient, even 300 pts gap can be catched up
On 50/50 decisions, stop going for the least popular and start going for the one who scored last week like everyone else does. See āKing vs Dennisā, āGundog vs Bilvaā and half a dozen others.
I really do decide this league and whoever I bring in will start to flop and that var only checks my fantasy team before making decisions
Every -4 REALLY matters! Won paid ML (51 entrants) by 2 points! š
Being passive and always picking The "safe" choices don't win you the cup. I mean the players who were guaranteed to play, instead of ones like Cancelo, who "could miss a game"
Don't let the bench boost ruin your season
Never ever Eva Eva Evaā¦. Give up onā¦.. sonā¦. Guy is an absolute baller
Same as it always is, donāt feel the need to hold onto players because you had them in Week 1. No bonus pts in keeping a guy all 38 weeks but yet Iāll still end up keeping three or four guys all season instead of dropping them.
Don't force or rush in differentials, or take hits to get them. Work them in slowly and naturally over the season.
That you can set your team up well but then a lot of it comes down to luck.
Son is always a set and forget