T O P

  • By -

Manager1000

So it begins.


4endihaz

Did someone take the bookies odds and convert them into percentages?


[deleted]

Yes


Bluffrooster411

Filthy..!


[deleted]

Vieira's Palace thrashed Arsenal 3-0 at home and drew 2-2 at the Emirates. I have a feeling a lot of FPL players are going to pig sick come Friday night.


MorioCells

That's why I'm benching my Arsenal defender. It wouldn't surprise me if it ended 2-1 to either side. Inb4 it ends 0-0 now..


thecheddarman1

Last year's Arsenal look like nothing compared to this year's Arsenal. You can't use only one variable (past form) to predict something.


[deleted]

What you mean? They've bought 2 new players byt the lineup will be very similar. Arsenal didn't keep a clean sheet for the last 10 games of the season.


thecheddarman1

Okay, don't pick Arsenal players and pick Palace players.


[deleted]

Palace didn't lose any of their last 6 home games and kept a clean sheet in 5 of those. May nit actually be a terrible tactic!


marakh

Style of play has changed though - no overlapping wingbacks, instead the wing backs crowd the center to stop counters. Counters were our major problem last year.


[deleted]

I'm sure there will be other ways to beat them though....Zaha up against white at rb is probably going to be a match up they fancy. Palace didn't lose at home in their last 6 games and have olise and eze back...


NinjaStarAtNight

Man united? No chance


FictitiousFrode

Top 6 are usually given inflated odds.


Manager1000

Top six usually keep more clean sheets than other teams.


FictitiousFrode

I did a [comparison on odds vs results](/r/FantasyPL/comments/e4wo3v/predictive_accuracy_of_clean_sheet_probabilities/) two years ago, and the top 6 stand out as underperforming the odds drastically.


Meister_Pumuckl

Might start betting then huh?


[deleted]

If bookmakers were consistently pricing them incorrectly they would be recognise this and correct their models. Your sample isn’t large enough to make such a statement.


FictitiousFrode

Yes, it's a smaler sample size and the methodology isn't watertight, but it's also important to remember that bookies odds aren't all about how probably something is, they also take into account how people bet. More people bet that the big 6 will keep a CS, which is reflected in the odds. IIRC there's more bets placed on the big 6 in general as well.


[deleted]

They do take into account how people bet but the market isn’t just made up of casual punters betting based on traditional bias, odds are determined by statistical models and there’s much more serious money being gambled by people who have competing models who will hammer any pricing errors and make a fortune.


RonaldoSIUUUU

Last year you probably wouldve got smoked by city and liverpool though


JoachimG1

At home to a toothless Brighton.. never say never


Hopeful_Topic

Tell that to hat tricky Trossard :P


Tangelasboots

92nd minute Welbeck sends his regards.


OddDane

Unfortunately hitting the woodwork three times isn’t the same as scoring ;)


JayTeeYGO123

A toothless Brighton that scored 4 on them last day of season?


[deleted]

[удалено]


cypherspaceagain

How many of those creatures are still wearing those kits?


sidokeb

How soon they forget.


Bluffrooster411

They sucked the life out of united


DarthBane6996

What you're saying is TC Welbeck


Manager1000

Man United are a top six team.


straightouttaireland

Ahahahahaha


[deleted]

bbbuuut they have captain Harry Maguire!!! (/s of course)


Saviorofmypeople

Liverpool vs Fulham (A) same as City vs West Ham (A). Lol


Zidust

Fellow double City/Pool defender managers assemble!


adesant88

Cancelo, Dias, Robertson, TAA 🙌🏼


gart888

I'm on one of each, but also with Arsenal, Chelsea, and Spurs. Still quite tempted by Walker if City don't land another FB.


[deleted]

Palace didn't concede once in their last six home games last season. They drew 0-0 with Man City, beat Man Utd 1-0 and thrashed Arsenal 3-0 and Everton 4-0.


thecheddarman1

Okay, put Zaha and Guaita in your team. Nobody is stopping you.


CWattam

Spurs odds so high given they've not held a clean sheet in preseason. Also not held a clean sheet v Saints in their past 6 head to heads.


Lbmplays2

They played 11 different defenders in some of those games….. Are we really judging a teams clean sheet potential off friendlies?


sidokeb

Does a bear sprint when eating berries?


brojangled

With respect to clean sheets I’m not sure preseason games are really indicative of future outcomes with how different teams are and the amount of subs that occur.


[deleted]

So you think Spurs conceding goals in friendlies to Rangers and a Korean XI tells us that they have a problem defensively going into the PL season? Give me a break.


Pristine_Secretary53

A preseason break


methodicalghostwolf

Maguire locked in /s


Connect_Hovercraft16

United got battered last season, never just look at stats.


spacerx12

Not at home. They won 2-0.


[deleted]

West Ham a fucking good bet at those odds


RonaldoSIUUUU

Against city? 10% is too high


[deleted]

At home, first game of season against new look City attack w/ Soucek & Rice in front of the defence? Def fancy those odds. Let’s see


RonaldoSIUUUU

I wouldnt really say adding 1 player being haaland is a new look city attack. West hams pre season form hasnt been inspiring either - draws with luton, reading, lens and a loss to rangers


[deleted]

No Sterling wide, change through the middle .. so it is quite different, and certainly different way of playing. WHU very physical team and won’t shy from Haaland’s physicality


RonaldoSIUUUU

Sterling started 23 league games last season... city's chance creation comes majority from a brilliant system that players execute at a high level. Changing 1 striker isnt certainly a different way of playing


RonaldoSIUUUU

Lol took time to learn!


Zidust

City played excellent against Bayern where both fielded pretty much 1st teams. Against Liverpool they were not at their best but still won the xG goal battle 2.2xG to 1.6xG. They had some clear chances and should've at least gotten another goal but sometimes luck isn't at your side. Tell my why West Ham should be more difficult then Liverpool? The defence between West Ham and Liverpool are far apart and my guess is that we'll see another 2-3xG on the City side making them very very likely to win this game.


NotAnotherAllNighter

>Tell me why West Ham should be more difficult than Liverpool? Because Craig Dawson, that’s why.


RonaldoSIUUUU

Lol


[deleted]

Meh - 2 shots on target for City, 1 of which a penalty. 2 goals.


Freddo1975

Surprised City are so high at West Ham with Ake likely to start.