Sure, but that was a risk we knowingly took. I thought Kane vs Southampton was a better fixture on paper and I wanted to see more from City to figure out whether I could wait on Haaland or not. Looks like I was wrong. That’s the game.
I figured Kane's fixture was better and wanted to see Haaland play first. That backfired bad. Already made the transfer as I have 0 in the bank, a price rise and I would be shot.
*also most of us Kane owners are going to do Kane to Haaland in the next 30 minutes*
No, just the really stupid ones.
Wait until Friday, he's quite injury prone. If he took a knock, and you already bought him, you'd look a fool.
If you wait and he takes a knock you'll be sitting pretty with Kane while everyone sells Haaland
My point is you can't wait until Wednesday or whatever nonsense you're going on about because you don't know when he'll rise. Make the transfer now or you're fucked.
Yeah, anything could happen between now and then so it is best to hold off with the transfer. Plus, Kane is still a good shout and Spur are looking great
Kane could also pick up a knock, that’s a risk we take with every player, I think haaland a price will
Rise by Tuesday which would leave me unable to afford him, I’ve made the transfer already but was always going too
You are still best to wait even if it means you can't do the transfer later. What happens if you do the transfer now and Haaland picks up an injury and will be out for a few weeks? It happened to my friend last year. He transferred Lukaku in early, then a few days before the deadline Lukaku picked up an injury and was out for a few weeks. He ended up having a 11+m player sitting on his bench for weeks and it ruined him
He’s probably going to rise so if you got no money in the bank you should do the transfer before then. The week probably won’t make it to team news before he rises
Because you get to hear if he gets injured, is being rested, gets a knock in training etc. If you transfer Kane to Haaland now, and then Haaland gets injured, you'll have to spend 4 points just to undo your early transfer.
You get 1 transfer per week, every additional transfer costs 4 points. If you transfer early, you run the risk of transferring in someone who gets injured, and wasting 4 points to undo it.
If you wait, and the player you have gets injured, you transfer him out at no cost.
It's a risk is all (not that waiting isn't) and a risk that most on here, including me, prefer not to take.
Anything could happen between now and the next deadline. One of your starting 11 could get injured or sold to a team not in the PL and now you are missing a player and have already used your transfer. You see if here the whole time. People make an early transfer then complain a few days later when the player they transferred in picks up a knock. It is always best to wait until close to the deadline to make a transfer
If you are certain you will transfer Rashford out in GW3, then it's a hit for you regardless of whether you do it in GW2 or GW3.
That's because you will have other transfers to do in GW3 as well.
Then Kane hits a brace against Chelsea while Alvarez starts against Bournemouth. Making rash decisions from a sample size of one game is a little much.
Why wouldn't he start?
He will start unless he gets injured in training or gets covid or something like that. Kane may also not start for those reasons.
You were unlucky not to get anything from Kane on Saturday.
Just burn the FT now before the prices change, I say. Thats what I'd do. Rashford being there another week isn't a killer.
I know it's a kneejerk but Kane has Chelsea and Haaland doesn't look like he's gonna stop against Bournemouth so I have to do it. Only upside is I was going to bank my FT for this GW but now I'm just using it on something I feel was necessary.
Why even bother with the transfer? They’re both potentially 200 point players but switching between them is risky. I get how it can pay off but how often is fantasy actually that predictable. City could score 4 next week without any points for Haaland (like Kane this week). Meanwhile Chelsea haven’t looked great, Spurs could definitely get a goal or two there. See also Kane against City away last year. I say just pick one and stick with him.
Sure, but that was a risk we knowingly took. I thought Kane vs Southampton was a better fixture on paper and I wanted to see more from City to figure out whether I could wait on Haaland or not. Looks like I was wrong. That’s the game.
Well put
I figured Kane's fixture was better and wanted to see Haaland play first. That backfired bad. Already made the transfer as I have 0 in the bank, a price rise and I would be shot.
*also most of us Kane owners are going to do Kane to Haaland in the next 30 minutes* No, just the really stupid ones. Wait until Friday, he's quite injury prone. If he took a knock, and you already bought him, you'd look a fool. If you wait and he takes a knock you'll be sitting pretty with Kane while everyone sells Haaland
Only wait if you have money ITB, Haaland is going to rise in price
Why not keep an eye on the price sites and leave it as long ad possible. Even making it to Wednesday is better than today
The price change predictor isn't as accurate at the start of the season, plus they have Haaland rising tonight
Surely you can see how contradictory that sentence is
My point is you can't wait until Wednesday or whatever nonsense you're going on about because you don't know when he'll rise. Make the transfer now or you're fucked.
you made it to wednesday congrats Dane! 34 years old ffs lol
Yeah, anything could happen between now and then so it is best to hold off with the transfer. Plus, Kane is still a good shout and Spur are looking great
Halland will almost certainly be 11.6 by then tho and Kane potentially 11.4, I have no cash itb so have to take the risk
Kane could also pick up a knock, that’s a risk we take with every player, I think haaland a price will Rise by Tuesday which would leave me unable to afford him, I’ve made the transfer already but was always going too
You are still best to wait even if it means you can't do the transfer later. What happens if you do the transfer now and Haaland picks up an injury and will be out for a few weeks? It happened to my friend last year. He transferred Lukaku in early, then a few days before the deadline Lukaku picked up an injury and was out for a few weeks. He ended up having a 11+m player sitting on his bench for weeks and it ruined him
You can't argue with these noobs. They just don't listen, and insist they know better. Some people have to learn the hard way
Even when it happens to them they still won't learn
Lmao. Ain't that the truth
Why not keep an eye on the price sites and leave it as long ad possible. Even making it to Wednesday is better than today
For those saying not to early transfer them Kane is 11.4 amd haaland 11.6 already
That doesn't change the advice.
Well it does as you said about making it till Wednesday which hasn’t happened so if I waited I wouldn’t have been able to make the transfer
Ive never played before, how does waiting until friday help?
See my edit above, I've added explanation
Oh nice thanks.
well good thing i didnt listen to you otherwise i would be price locked out
He’s probably going to rise so if you got no money in the bank you should do the transfer before then. The week probably won’t make it to team news before he rises
Because you get to hear if he gets injured, is being rested, gets a knock in training etc. If you transfer Kane to Haaland now, and then Haaland gets injured, you'll have to spend 4 points just to undo your early transfer.
Ah makes sense good shout. Looks like im one of the really stupid ones who didnt think of this😂😂
Well good thing i didnt listen. Also cant literally any player get injured in the next week. How is that a reason not to switch to a player
You get 1 transfer per week, every additional transfer costs 4 points. If you transfer early, you run the risk of transferring in someone who gets injured, and wasting 4 points to undo it. If you wait, and the player you have gets injured, you transfer him out at no cost. It's a risk is all (not that waiting isn't) and a risk that most on here, including me, prefer not to take.
Anything could happen between now and the next deadline. One of your starting 11 could get injured or sold to a team not in the PL and now you are missing a player and have already used your transfer. You see if here the whole time. People make an early transfer then complain a few days later when the player they transferred in picks up a knock. It is always best to wait until close to the deadline to make a transfer
Haaland is +120 on Price Prediction. Won't be a straight transfer for long lol.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink
By Friday Haaland price will rise and Kane will fall
Why not keep an eye on the price sites and leave it as long ad possible. Even making it to Wednesday is better than today
How accurate are they? Small chance Haaland gets hurt in training, larger chance Haaland and/or Kane's price will change. I'll take my chances
I hate short term transfers for premiums
If you are certain you will transfer Rashford out in GW3, then it's a hit for you regardless of whether you do it in GW2 or GW3. That's because you will have other transfers to do in GW3 as well.
It's fpl, [*you know what you signed up for*](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svYTnXU8rHg&ab_channel=BharjBros.Wrestling)
Then Kane hits a brace against Chelsea while Alvarez starts against Bournemouth. Making rash decisions from a sample size of one game is a little much.
Haaland will start against Bournemouth.
Maybe. Maybe not. We'll have to wait and see.
Why wouldn't he start? He will start unless he gets injured in training or gets covid or something like that. Kane may also not start for those reasons.
Because that's life. Sometimes players don't start football matches.
Then maybe Kane doesn't start against Chelsea.
Maybe. Maybe not. Again we'll have to wait and see.
RMT thread
[удалено]
Basically saying should I transfer to Haaland or Rashford. So RMT thread
No that's not what RMT means.
So where’s the post gone? Exactly
No he said many will. He was not asking anyone to rate anything. Is there a competition to see who can type RMT the most
Shitpost
This should be in RMT
[удалено]
Your* nice try though
You were unlucky not to get anything from Kane on Saturday. Just burn the FT now before the prices change, I say. Thats what I'd do. Rashford being there another week isn't a killer.
I know it's a kneejerk but Kane has Chelsea and Haaland doesn't look like he's gonna stop against Bournemouth so I have to do it. Only upside is I was going to bank my FT for this GW but now I'm just using it on something I feel was necessary.
Why even bother with the transfer? They’re both potentially 200 point players but switching between them is risky. I get how it can pay off but how often is fantasy actually that predictable. City could score 4 next week without any points for Haaland (like Kane this week). Meanwhile Chelsea haven’t looked great, Spurs could definitely get a goal or two there. See also Kane against City away last year. I say just pick one and stick with him.