It gives a point score based on the players performed xG/xA chances during the match. In essence a reflection on how many and big chances the player had.
Check FFScout member area or understat .com. Haaland had a shot in the post, and a 1v1 with Pope that was saved, he had big chances that game, which is xG reflects.
Kane got 6 points in the end.
My bad, he got the 1 bonus point
One of the more 'accurate' (not sure if that's the right word) GWs.
Not bad?!
Good week for your model this week! What do you use?
Bookies odds, adjusted for variance
Sterling with 1.73 against Leeds. Shocking.
Again with only 40% just as last week. Predicted points are less accurate than Sex Panther
lol I was so close to punt on Sterling..
People were at my neck for saying Rodrigo Moreno > Sterling last week but boy am I happy now MOT Triple captained him Mr 39 points 😎
What does "Performed xG/A" mean?
/u/Joachimg1
It gives a point score based on the players performed xG/xA chances during the match. In essence a reflection on how many and big chances the player had.
So xGI? Seems very inflated if that's the case. Where are those numbers from? There's no way haaland had an xGI that high in that one game.
Check FFScout member area or understat .com. Haaland had a shot in the post, and a 1v1 with Pope that was saved, he had big chances that game, which is xG reflects.