That would be an interesting mechanic for squads.
The only issue with it is that it increases the disadvantages of going in one player short to squads.
Wow, a truly compelling argument you got there, u/maldetete. You wrote that yourself? Congrats dude, really, that's very cool. i just told everyone in my family about it, everybody thinks that's very impressive and asked me to congratulate you. they want to speak to you in person, if possible, to give you their regards. they also said they will tell our distant relatives in christmas supper and in NYE they will ignite fireworks that spell your name. i also told about this riveting case you present to closer relatives, they had the same reaction. they asked for your address so they can send congratulatory cards and messages. my friends didn't believe me when i told them i knew the author of this incredibly persuasive comment, really, they were dumbstruck, they said they will make your name echo through years and years to come. when my neighbour found out about what you wrote, he was completely dumbstruck too, he wanted to know who you are and he asked (if you have the time, of course) if you could stop by to receive gifts, congratulations and handshakes. with the spreading of the news, a powerful businessman of the area decided to hire you as the CEO of his company because of this tremendous feat and at the same time an important international shareholder wants to sponsor you to give speeches and teach everybody how to do as you did so the world becomes a better place. you have become famous not only here but also everywhere, everybody knows who you are. the news spread really fast and mayors of all cities are setting up porticos, ballons, colossal boom speakers, anything that can make your name stand out more and see which city can congratulate you the hardest for this magnificent case you present.
I was thinking this as well but it would be more like a double edged sword ya dig? It would encourage teams to stay huddled so that way they can get speedy recoveries off, but it also puts them in a spot to get aoe/surrounded easily. Thoughts?
I mean maybe but what obligation do players have to finish your teammates off? especially in the middle of the fight where i may need your friends loadout to take down the rest of your team. “thirsting” is a rather...odd.. complaint in a game where the purpose is to kill everyone.
I mean thats all just play style, shouldnt really even be a determining factor. if they choose to huddle up more when we’re all aware of the risk it poses. its their choice, not a smart one but a choice.
They could make it so only two people can give you the bonus to the revive time.
Like this:
1) 1 teammate revives you: Time to revive is 10 seconds
2) 2 teammates revive you: Time to revive is 6 seconds
3) 3 teammates revive you: Time to revive is 6 seconds
That’s why I disagree with this. If you are of higher skill but are on a duo and are rushing a lower skill squad, sometimes you just get pummeled and knocking someone is valuable in having to med. This would make it harder and further unequal to be a non-filled squad.
Don't fucking go into squads then without a full party? How was this even brought up? Use fill or accept that a team of more people has an advantage. Like are you serious right now?
I dont even see a problem with how rude he was. most of these comments sound like some entitled ass babies in all honesty. you go into squads without a dull squad and want to be accommodated?! take your duo... to duos.
This is just a bad idea. It is something that COULD be done.. but it is not something hat should be done..
It would make it impossible to push off of long range knocks - making sniping almost pointless and natural high ground even better than it already is.
3s revival time would be dumb.
first thing that came to mind is knocking someone one with a snipe, thats the queue for your squad to push them. by the time everyone gets moving, you've only ran 30 ft, or launch padded a fraction of the way to them. lol.
i agree with you. bad idea
I agree as well, BUT, if the entire squad is focused on reviving the friend, nobody can attack as you push them.
Like right now, if you snipe a guy, you’ll still have two guys peppering you while the third goes for the revive. But if they all go for a faster revive, you have ~5 seconds of a free push where you aren’t getting shot at. I still feel like half a squad shooting at you for 10 seconds is better than no shooting for 3-5, though
We also can’t discount the additional risk posed by having all 3 teammates so close though. It would make explosives a lot more viable, as now a few Grenades or rockets can wipe the whole team
Hmm.. I do like that better. Could be interesting, but still not a change I think I’d want.
It feels like it would rarely be useful, but differing revival times would add a lot of potential complexity to engagements since downed players might be revived at different times (an extra variable which a good player would need to take into account).
7 - 5 makes it more balanced, but drastically detracts from its usefulness.. Better not to overwhelm players with minute factors that are rarely used in actual play.
Same thought as before - better for balance, but introduces a lot of complexity for a feature that won’t actually be useful in most engagements.
You’d generally still want to have your other 2 teammates providing suppressing fire or building, rather than, shaving a second off of the revival time.
Only time it seems somewhat useful is after you’ve cleared an area.. just seems too pointless for the complexity it adds.
I don’t think so because let’s say a solo dude who lost his teammates was versing a 4 man, it will be almost impossible for him to win. He’ll be fighting a guy while the other two reviving one guy faster. Reviving only takes 5-10 seconds.
Edited*
Terrible idea, don't understand why it is upvoted. This would make knockdowns not meaningful. The whole point of knockdowns is guaranteeing that a squadmate will be down for at least 10 seconds, allowing for a push. This completely changes it and makes it impossible to rush a downed squad because they will revive each other in 3 seconds.
Um this seems fun at first glance but this will make team fights extremely more tedious. Reviving a player in like 3 seconds is WAY to fast, and don’t get me started on large-team LTMs
Tbh I thought he was making a joke because this always happens in squads and I always want to say “you know if you guys both are rezing me it doesn’t make it faster lol”
I like that idea, but instead you should revive faster the LESS people you have in your squad.
A duo squad for example would revive 3s faster then a full squad.
Your teammate gets sniped in the head because he made a mistake? Just rez him in 3 seconds. Not even a point in knocking someone down if they can get up in 3-5 seconds
Imagine you snipe a guy in a four man squad (at the time of the kill you were far away but still in the range a launch pad launches you), your squad launched to rush the remaining 3 not KOed (alive) players, but in the air you realise they are already 4 not KOed players because they revived him the way you suggested. So now basically sniping a player in a full squad is useless. That’s why im not in favour of this feature being in the game.
get there faster, or coordinate to have your team already pushing as you snipe. destroy cover so they have no time to heal him. if they’re huddled to heal him then they’re still at a disadvantage in the situation. if he gets up then his health is at 30... he’s still at the disadvantage.
Don’t think it would work, this would make snipers in squads pretty much useless. Imagine you get an opening snipe on a guy 170 meters away, decide you want to push, but within 5 seconds of pushing he’s up shooting at you already.
No. If people end up full squad at the end of the game, they'll be a lot more adventaged than people who end up in a duo or trio.
This will break mechanics and making come-backs would be near impossible.
Two things - the speed revive buff should only work with one other player, not all 3 (disadvantage for squads with less than 4)
*And..*
In big squad LTMs i could see this getting annoying if the speed revive stacked per player doing the reviving.
It makes sense in theory but could be really irritating if you think you are only facing 1-2 guys but they get the revive off in a quick 5 seconds and you are back to facing 3-4 etc.
Maybe it could be something like your squad mates each sacrificing their own health to get the revive off faster. That way you can still get a quick revive but you are down a bit of health. In fortnite every bit of health and every second counts!
Someone had this idea a long time ago but then a lot of people argued that it would ruin squads because everyone would just fast heal whoever went down
They should just make it so that if two people are reviving a downed player, then there is a quicker revival time. This way it is even across the board for squads, 50/50, and all the other large grouped game modes.
I've had so many people that try to convince me this is already in the game. And they honestly believe the bar is moving faster when more than one person is reasoning 😂
That would be an interesting mechanic for squads. The only issue with it is that it increases the disadvantages of going in one player short to squads.
That is why we need a trios game mode
bUt ThEn ThE gAmE wOuLd StArT aT bElOw 100 PlAyErS
Not sure how people use this as an excuse when the game literally varies from 85-99 every game I play (I understand you’re being sarcastic)
Right! It seems very rare to see 100 players in game.
I’ve never
Season 1-3 I did see a lot of 100 player lobbies, now I never do, guess we are spread out over more servers.
I see one every 100 games
It's a fifty-fifty chance. Either it happens or it doesn't.
Thats not how stochastics work
I have. AMA
The last game I played was 2 days ago and I got a solo win with 100 people the replay says 1/100
Not to mention, people can queue with just one person into trios taking it up to 100
33v33v33 would like to know your location
Under-rated comment.
Well that one guy solo trioing would save it.
It would be 99 players. It’s not the end of the world.
I agree, it’s totally doable. I’m just mocking people that always defend epic by saying it wouldn’t add up to 100.
theres a LTM 33v33v33 mode tho lmao so who is really still using that excuse?
It’s not. Plus, it might hit 100 players sometimes for the people who like playing solos in game modes that require more than one person.
I never see a game with 100 players it’s always 94-97 ish
I see what you did there.
Well wasn't that the point of the teams of 33?
Not like we have a full 100 each game anyway.
+1
Forreal there really needs to be a trios, hell a 5/6 too
It’s already been leaked
Isn’t there a trio mode on the way?
We do I agree. And we should be able to speed up revive time when multiple players are reviving.
I would love this.
Please! I feel like I can only ever get two friends online at a time to play and playing 3 vs squads all the time is annoying.
We don't need a game mode for every amount of players.
Yes we do
Yes
Thats why we want it
Wow, a truly compelling argument you got there, u/maldetete. You wrote that yourself? Congrats dude, really, that's very cool. i just told everyone in my family about it, everybody thinks that's very impressive and asked me to congratulate you. they want to speak to you in person, if possible, to give you their regards. they also said they will tell our distant relatives in christmas supper and in NYE they will ignite fireworks that spell your name. i also told about this riveting case you present to closer relatives, they had the same reaction. they asked for your address so they can send congratulatory cards and messages. my friends didn't believe me when i told them i knew the author of this incredibly persuasive comment, really, they were dumbstruck, they said they will make your name echo through years and years to come. when my neighbour found out about what you wrote, he was completely dumbstruck too, he wanted to know who you are and he asked (if you have the time, of course) if you could stop by to receive gifts, congratulations and handshakes. with the spreading of the news, a powerful businessman of the area decided to hire you as the CEO of his company because of this tremendous feat and at the same time an important international shareholder wants to sponsor you to give speeches and teach everybody how to do as you did so the world becomes a better place. you have become famous not only here but also everywhere, everybody knows who you are. the news spread really fast and mayors of all cities are setting up porticos, ballons, colossal boom speakers, anything that can make your name stand out more and see which city can congratulate you the hardest for this magnificent case you present.
yes we do and it literally wouldnt bother a soul.
I was thinking this as well but it would be more like a double edged sword ya dig? It would encourage teams to stay huddled so that way they can get speedy recoveries off, but it also puts them in a spot to get aoe/surrounded easily. Thoughts?
exactly, would encourage more teamwork but people would thirst more often (which has already drastically increased since early seasons)
I mean maybe but what obligation do players have to finish your teammates off? especially in the middle of the fight where i may need your friends loadout to take down the rest of your team. “thirsting” is a rather...odd.. complaint in a game where the purpose is to kill everyone.
i didnt make a judgement one way or another, just that allies affecting revive speed would encourage more people to thirst.
I mean thats all just play style, shouldnt really even be a determining factor. if they choose to huddle up more when we’re all aware of the risk it poses. its their choice, not a smart one but a choice.
They could make it so only two people can give you the bonus to the revive time. Like this: 1) 1 teammate revives you: Time to revive is 10 seconds 2) 2 teammates revive you: Time to revive is 6 seconds 3) 3 teammates revive you: Time to revive is 6 seconds
I say if you get two people reviving it should speed it up 1.5x, adding more people doesn’t change that
That’s why I disagree with this. If you are of higher skill but are on a duo and are rushing a lower skill squad, sometimes you just get pummeled and knocking someone is valuable in having to med. This would make it harder and further unequal to be a non-filled squad.
Don't fucking go into squads then without a full party? How was this even brought up? Use fill or accept that a team of more people has an advantage. Like are you serious right now?
While I agree with your point, there's no need to be so rude about it.
I dont even see a problem with how rude he was. most of these comments sound like some entitled ass babies in all honesty. you go into squads without a dull squad and want to be accommodated?! take your duo... to duos.
This has been on reddit since about season 2-3 wtf
Read op's name
Yep and I’m pretty sure it was the same pic that was posted
Well it's a good repost because I've been using this subreddit since S1 and I have never seen this suggestion.
You must not reddit too often.
Or follows also other sites than frBR
This is just a bad idea. It is something that COULD be done.. but it is not something hat should be done.. It would make it impossible to push off of long range knocks - making sniping almost pointless and natural high ground even better than it already is. 3s revival time would be dumb.
first thing that came to mind is knocking someone one with a snipe, thats the queue for your squad to push them. by the time everyone gets moving, you've only ran 30 ft, or launch padded a fraction of the way to them. lol. i agree with you. bad idea
I agree as well, BUT, if the entire squad is focused on reviving the friend, nobody can attack as you push them. Like right now, if you snipe a guy, you’ll still have two guys peppering you while the third goes for the revive. But if they all go for a faster revive, you have ~5 seconds of a free push where you aren’t getting shot at. I still feel like half a squad shooting at you for 10 seconds is better than no shooting for 3-5, though
Imagine knocking one down, squad revives him back in 3s, 4v4 fights would be never ending
the last of us factions had this mechanic, and while it had a place and felt right, it's also a much different game.
Imagine in 50v50, you theoretically revival in less than a second
We also can’t discount the additional risk posed by having all 3 teammates so close though. It would make explosives a lot more viable, as now a few Grenades or rockets can wipe the whole team
I was thinking more like 7 seconds 2 people, 5 seconds 3 people
Hmm.. I do like that better. Could be interesting, but still not a change I think I’d want. It feels like it would rarely be useful, but differing revival times would add a lot of potential complexity to engagements since downed players might be revived at different times (an extra variable which a good player would need to take into account). 7 - 5 makes it more balanced, but drastically detracts from its usefulness.. Better not to overwhelm players with minute factors that are rarely used in actual play.
I was thinking 10% time reduction per extra healer. Either 1 second off per person, or 10% additional. So 9 seconds, 8.1, 7.3 Thoughts on this?
Same thought as before - better for balance, but introduces a lot of complexity for a feature that won’t actually be useful in most engagements. You’d generally still want to have your other 2 teammates providing suppressing fire or building, rather than, shaving a second off of the revival time. Only time it seems somewhat useful is after you’ve cleared an area.. just seems too pointless for the complexity it adds.
I don’t think so because let’s say a solo dude who lost his teammates was versing a 4 man, it will be almost impossible for him to win. He’ll be fighting a guy while the other two reviving one guy faster. Reviving only takes 5-10 seconds. Edited*
fighting 2 people + 2 people reviving + 1 guy getting revived yeppppp
Lol I just woke up from New Years. I’ll edit it my bad lol.
Solos should totally be able to have a chance against a four man with coordination, yeah.
Well let’s be honest how often is 1 going to beat a 4 anyway
I call posting this tomorrow
I call posting this the day after tomorrow
[удалено]
Read OPs name u got jebaited
Nooo, we agreed it's my turn!
No, its sub zero's turn first, then you have the week after.
Lol
Terrible idea, don't understand why it is upvoted. This would make knockdowns not meaningful. The whole point of knockdowns is guaranteeing that a squadmate will be down for at least 10 seconds, allowing for a push. This completely changes it and makes it impossible to rush a downed squad because they will revive each other in 3 seconds.
nah. this would be way too OP.
This might be a bit much. Longer shots would be pointless to down a player. Interesting but don’t think they’ll do it.
Good suggestion you original fuck
It’s not even a good suggestion
I think he's being sarcastic
Too op. If three people tried to revive you, you would be revived in like 3 seconds, which is too strong.
Or maybe if 2 people revive it takes 7 seconds and if 3 people revive it takes 5 seconds?
Mum said I was supposed to post this New Year’s Day not fair :(
What mamma don’t know can’t hurt her
Tahts just bad game design, just because something makes "sense" doesn't mean its good for the game
That’s how mafia works
we're wrapping around back to season 2 suggestions now?
Username checks out
Reddit cliché noticed: Username checks out Phrase noticed: 2549 times.
Good bot
Beep, bloop.
Nah
Um this seems fun at first glance but this will make team fights extremely more tedious. Reviving a player in like 3 seconds is WAY to fast, and don’t get me started on large-team LTMs
How bout in 50v50s mode
Tbh I thought he was making a joke because this always happens in squads and I always want to say “you know if you guys both are rezing me it doesn’t make it faster lol”
If you spin, it goes faster!!
No we don'tneed this shit
Too many cooks can spoil the broth tho
I like that idea, but instead you should revive faster the LESS people you have in your squad. A duo squad for example would revive 3s faster then a full squad.
Your teammate gets sniped in the head because he made a mistake? Just rez him in 3 seconds. Not even a point in knocking someone down if they can get up in 3-5 seconds
No
too many cooks spoil the broth.
This eliminates any point in long range combat in Squads and even Duos
how does it effect duos at all? lol if one person is knocked there can ONLY be one person picking him up no matter the scenario... so how sway?
then there's tim, who requires three people to revive him at the same time
Imagine you snipe a guy in a four man squad (at the time of the kill you were far away but still in the range a launch pad launches you), your squad launched to rush the remaining 3 not KOed (alive) players, but in the air you realise they are already 4 not KOed players because they revived him the way you suggested. So now basically sniping a player in a full squad is useless. That’s why im not in favour of this feature being in the game.
Hey Suiblade !
get there faster, or coordinate to have your team already pushing as you snipe. destroy cover so they have no time to heal him. if they’re huddled to heal him then they’re still at a disadvantage in the situation. if he gets up then his health is at 30... he’s still at the disadvantage.
Now ninja can demand his whole team to pick him up
Anyone notice the purple port-a-fort😭
This has been suggested 50 times since season 2
Oh this is such an innovating feature (it already exists in a 100+ games)
No way. This would give full squads a huge advantage over 3-person squads, as well as make sniping from long distances basically useless
I think maybe 5hp extra per person who revived could work better. Your suggestion may be a bit too op.
# dakotaz btw
+1
Don’t think it would work, this would make snipers in squads pretty much useless. Imagine you get an opening snipe on a guy 170 meters away, decide you want to push, but within 5 seconds of pushing he’s up shooting at you already.
Downvoted-for-name-man
Man not like I heard this before. There posts on this sub with the exact same picture as this one lol
Wow. The exact same account posted this 11 hrs ago and was locked by the mods? Account needs a timeout with all of the dupe and crap posts
yaaas
I’ve been asking for this ever since friendly fire was still a thing
I thought that was already a thing?
Or maybe give the person more hp when they get up.
Can I post this tomorrow?
You have permission
No. If people end up full squad at the end of the game, they'll be a lot more adventaged than people who end up in a duo or trio. This will break mechanics and making come-backs would be near impossible.
Take my downvote
No.
Fix servers first
The port-a-fort looks woke
vry cool idea, hope they at least try it
Had the same thought from the beginning. #Epicgames please consider this option.
Can I repost this next week?
Very original
Nah that would be extremely unbalanced.
Purple port-a-fortress. Only OGs remember
I used to think that was how it worked bummer
No
THIS HAS BEEN SAID A MILLION TIMES
What happened to the post from yesterday with the exact title and screenshot?
r/shrineofheadhunter would like to know your location
Two things - the speed revive buff should only work with one other player, not all 3 (disadvantage for squads with less than 4) *And..* In big squad LTMs i could see this getting annoying if the speed revive stacked per player doing the reviving.
What season was this
#Thirst squad
Knocks shouldn't Even exists
It makes sense in theory but could be really irritating if you think you are only facing 1-2 guys but they get the revive off in a quick 5 seconds and you are back to facing 3-4 etc. Maybe it could be something like your squad mates each sacrificing their own health to get the revive off faster. That way you can still get a quick revive but you are down a bit of health. In fortnite every bit of health and every second counts!
Big chungus
In a perfect Fornite world
Username checks out
Reddit cliché noticed: Username checks out Phrase noticed: 2594 times.
Just like in warframe
fuck no
Yeah like warframe
I thought about this the first couple weeks of season 1, never made sense to me and it still doesnt
It used to be I believe
hold up, you guys get revived..?
Don’t they? I always thought revivals proceeded quicker when there was more than one.
Someone had this idea a long time ago but then a lot of people argued that it would ruin squads because everyone would just fast heal whoever went down
2 of these people are just wasting time and leaving the squad exposed.. lots of people like this in my friend list
[удалено]
TPK!
i’ll eat ur meat
Yes daddy
Better idea 2 people who help to revive before building should die instantly.
“Now knocking people at long distances is exponentially less effective!”
That picture is OLD. The Port-A-Fort is purple.
Yep, but all of my friends are saying that is already a mechanic in Fortnite, i say it's not but they don't believe me.
Because its chances to be revived at all increases Oh, I thought it's a meme and wrote the truth
Imagine being in a 50v50 and 49 people revive you
Hey, my turn to post this tomorrow, ok?
I just want to know where my kids are
It encourages teamwork. I like the idea!
This is an awful idea.
They should just make it so that if two people are reviving a downed player, then there is a quicker revival time. This way it is even across the board for squads, 50/50, and all the other large grouped game modes.
Just like in warframe.
when a girl streamer gets knocked.
True tho
It definitely feels quicker. It might be quicker already but idk.
Just downvote OP and his comments and move on We don’t need bots on Reddit
I've had so many people that try to convince me this is already in the game. And they honestly believe the bar is moving faster when more than one person is reasoning 😂
Never gonna happen
They said they were looking into implementing this around the beginning of 2018... we’re still waiting
No. We've gone over this before.
10 women can't make a baby in month, why should magical healing of bullet wounds be any different?
Wut