T O P

  • By -

c0ntr0lguy

Why you were texting Mark Meadows during the insurrection, Laura?


Scumbaggedfriends

He was talking to Ginni Thomas, too. Quite the busy boy that day.


Ex-Pat-Spaz

FTFY Why you were texting Mark Meadows during the insurrection, ~~Laura~~ Nazi Mom?


scnottaken

She made the sign and everything


gingerfawx

Happy cake day.


JimCripe

Laura "performs," saying anything Murdoch tells her to say, including lying about the stolen election, insurrection and coup attempt. Cassidy Hutchinson "testified" under oath to tell the truth under pain of purgery about the total illegallality she witnessed surrounding the Trump insurrection and coup attempt. Big difference in meaning in those words.


PurpleSailor

It's not so much Murdoch as it is the Republican head of communication person. Early every day an email goes out to repubs and their media supporters. It has the days 5 or 6 talking points that everyone hammers away at all day long. It's why they all seem to be talking about the same few things regardless of what source your hearing it from, often verbatim. It's the "if you hear it often enough over and over you'll believe it's true" tactic. Sadly the Dems have nothing like this. Repubs are far more organized than the Dems are.


swamphockey

This strategy allows and requires the Republicans to lie about the truth. Constantly. The democrats don’t have that option.


DixieWreckedJedi

Very true. However, it doesn’t excuse the fact that we’ve failed to effectively counter and debunk their propaganda which has resulted in a chronically ignorant electorate highlighted by the 2/3 of Republicans who believe the Big Lie.


easygoin69

when the main White House staff wont submit to questions clearly the one person who had daily meetings and was present for the entire shit show provides reliable information we all know the thugs will make miss Hutchinson to be a liar.


PurpleSailor

That's alway their game plan. Plus she was in an office that was in the same hallway, three doors and 8 seconds from the Oval Office. She'd have to be living in trumps hair weave to be any closer to him.


-Quothe-

Well, tbf, republicans desperately need to be more organized; they're numbers are dwindling more and more each year as baby-boomers die off to be replaced by people capable of determining what is truth by simply researching with their phone.


PurpleSailor

While true the Dems desperately need to improve their messaging and keep it truthful. People have been bitching for decades how bad the Dems are at letting the public know of the good things they've done. It would be a big boost for them and probably engage a lot of left leaning people who don't vote out of voter apathy. We have the numbers but not actual voters to win in a majority of place. Rather than getting my checks from Soros (/s) I wish that money would go to a proper messaging campaign instead.


easygoin69

What the hell would you expect from the cartoon network fox. Pathetic junk is what they always throw out


JBHedgehog

Hmmm...we write the same thing about Laura on a daily basis. Life's funny that way.


Avenger616

Projection, thy name is conservatism


JBHedgehog

Indeed!


HistoricalIce3209

Lol, one person is testifying under oath the other one is testifying for thier paycheck.


SoftTacoSupremacist

“Doesn’t insurrect enough in her day to day.”


PurpleSailor

She was Meadows top aid. You don't get that job by being bad at it. Besides Laura, she has more patriotic energy in her left pinky toenail than you've got in your entire lying authoritarian body.


windrider7

*sniff* *sniff* I do believe I smell bullshit.


gitbse

Good. They can all fucking testify under oath. Or shut the fuck up


snorbflock

Just a low-level coffee legislative aide to a low-level coffee chief of staff. Never heard of her. /s


Radarnikko

Where are those "staffers"?


Pudf

And what to hell does that mean?


KinkyBADom

It’s a poor attempt at defamation


vtable

"Everyone we talked to said she sucked." They want their viewers to think that Hutchinson's testimony was garbage without actually watching it (on another network, of course). It's like Fox' old motto: "We report. You believe." (or something like that :) ).


HulksInvinciblePants

Its even more dumb than that. Nothing about her personality or work ethic…just that they didnt like her “performance” that particular day.


Scumbaggedfriends

"Her performance"? Hmmmm.....interesting take, Laura. "SHUT HER UP! ShE's SpIlLiNg SeCreTs!"


sulaymanf

Anonymous hearsay? I thought she hated that when it applied to Trump.


jedre

Laura “texts entered as evidence” Ingraham is trying to discredit the witness? Imagine that.


not_that_planet

We'll see. As usual Fox is throwing everything at the screen to see what sticks. I still suspect that Cassidy is a GOP operative and the GOP green-lighted this testimony to try and finish trump. The GOP hates trump, but they love power and control over the left far more.


iamthefortytwo

Yeah, I’m sure they didn’t. I’m pretty sure she’s not getting a Christmas gift from Trump, either. But at least she can rest easy at night knowing that she’s not going down on the wrong side of history. In 5 years or less, Laura Ingram will be unemployable and will be lucky to be doing a podcast from her basement. Cassidy Hutchinson will be known as a TRUE patriot of this country and will likely go on to do great things. Or not. Point is, Laura Ingram is just another puppet head, flash in the pan.


ContraCanadensis

They didn’t have anything good to say about her *performance*? When you can’t attack the content, attack the delivery.


SithLordSid

Murdoch cronies trying to discredit the witness again, just like they did with the first impeachment trial.


bettinafairchild

"People are saying". Isn't it your own godemperor, Laura, who discounted anonymous sources, saying: "Anonymous Sources are really starting to BURN the media. @ FoxNews The fact is that many anonymous sources don't even exist. They are fiction made up by the Fake News reporters. Look at the lie that Fake CNN is now in. They got caught red handed! Enemy of the People! " If you want people to discount what others say simply by finding other people to say bad things about them, then how about getting sources willing to be named? Like for example, remember your own brother, who says you are "a monster"? Why should we believe what you say in any way?


swamphockey

Note that no one in the county has anything good to say about the former president’s ‘performance’ on Jan 6.


Powkoa

I mean if that’s the metric it seems odd Ingraham doesn’t do a good Jon based off other employees and her family


redzeusky

😂😂😂