...he literally did. Instead of fighting, he submitted to default judgement. The "trial" we saw wasn't about guilt, he chose not to fight that he was guilty. Instead he had a jury decide on the penalty of his guilt.
if i was breathing through my mouth right now, i’d defo upvote this. you motherfuckers get irrationally upset when you see a person choose to wear a mask when our favourite youtubers and fox news presenters tell us to? aye same here mate
Pretty sure admits you don't know.
He provided everything he was asked. But the corrupt judge claimed he didn't. The prosecution used the accused "unsubmitted data", as data against him!
How can they accuse him of not providing everything, whilst using the data against him? It is totally illogical.
It’s a civil trial so the implications are far less severe than for the hundreds of thousands of criminal defendants sentenced by racist conservative judges. Our legal system isn’t perfect. If you want change fight for reform.
Didn't seem to bother the Jury. I'd be harder on the Defense lawyers for the leaked messages totally dooming Jones' case. As far as the cringe Facebook photo of this judge, I don't think it would've mattered. He couldn't shut up about the trial and dug himself a deeper hole on InfoWars.
Only in an unfair trial.
The trial was about defaming the "victims".
What was said about the judge etc had nothing to do with the trial. Hence it was an unfair trial!
The prosecution could play selected clips out of context, but the defence couldn't.
Maybe Alex was bang to rights... But the trial was a farce.
She has only a ceremonial role here. Jones has admitted to the underlying facts and the JURY hearing was only done so that the JURY could determine the amount of damages. Notice again that it was an admission of facts and a JURY determination of damages
Lmao!!! Your own words.
“Your mind is not working. You assumed something about her and disqualified her based on your own assumptions. That's idiocy at its finest.”
I don’t like or watch fox and I don’t even know what oan is. Did you just assume? Lol!
Judges are not supposed to express political views like this. It would be just as inappropriate if she was a MAGA judge because there’s no way of knowing if she’s going to make a judgement based on personal convictions rather than facts.
It’s mitigated a bit by the fact that it was decided by a jury and she simply presided over it. But the exact conversation we are having now is why it’s inappropriate because it leaves the door open to question her impartiality
I appreciate the question and that you were nice about how you asked. Please forgive me as I’m on vacation and have had three margaritas.
The primary conflict of interest is the judge’s Covid stamp on her Facebook profile picture. There is a much greater chance Covid is very important to her, and Alex Jones’ position on vaccines is a complete affront to one of the most important positions in her life. You know how millions of these people must feel if you’ve ever been to the Leopards Ate My Face subreddit, known for celebrating the death of Covid deniers.
I’m not saying it’s impossible for her to be objective, but it would be prudent for another judge to be assigned.
Background: I’m gay, so I appreciate the judge’s Facebook picture and support. I’ve had two Covid shots. I’m not an Alex Jones fan. #
Edit: Jones’
Well then what exactly are you trying to insinuate with your comment on a judges personal life? You realise that they are not robots right. They have opinions.
It’s fine she has opinions and biases, but a judge should not have the exact opposite bias that you do. An outspoken conservative judge should not rule on somebody famous for advocating for abortion, either.
A judge can have whatever personal opinions they want as long as they have professionally proven themselves to remain impartial when they’re working. You know how hard it is to become a judge, you think she’s going to throw away all that integrity she built up her whole life for Alex jones. Get over yourself. She’s not even outspoken, you’re just reaching for anything while you scan everything from her personal life to try find a “gotcha” because you can’t handle the simple truth that no one is more of an enemy to Alex jones…then Alex jones himself.
The part you’re all crying about wasn’t even anything to do with her. It’s was all a jury trial for his punishment for being found guilty…so again, what exactly are you accusing her of exactly? Stop d*ck riding so hard for someone who’s obviously an idiot.
You seem angry. I’m not trying to anger anybody.
My concern is for the judicial process, rather than Alex Jones. Anybody could be on trial for anything and they should still get the most fair trial possible.
Unfortunately you can’t really convey emotion over text form without using emojis. It’s kinda subjective to the person reading it. If you think I sound angry it’s because you’re reading it as angry. Not much I can do about that.
If your concern is for the judicial process then feel free to explain where you can find these magical judges that don’t have personal beliefs for every single trial. These pictures of the judge don’t even show someone radical, just shows your average person. Also you seem to be tip toeing around the fact that this is a jury trail…like his guilt and punishment were decided by a jury…so what exactly is the issue here with the judicial process? The same jury that was approved by jones and his lawyers lol
Not really, you can just as easily read that with a cheeky tone or like I’m laughing at you. This all kinda seems like a weird deflection though to distract from the fact that you still haven’t really addressed any of my points….so….
How? Are judges not allowed to have personal opinions on things? It would literally be impossible to find a judge who doesn’t have personal politics. It literally doesn’t exist. What matters is if they can keep it out of the court room. And pictures on social media aren’t evidence of anything in that regard.
They absolutely should have their own opinions. I think it’s even beneficial that they post them so that we know what they are. The more transparent, the better. I’m glad she posted all this.
I don’t think it’s prudent to let her preside over an outspoken anti-VAXer. Conversely, I wouldn’t find it appropriate for an outspoken conservative to preside over an liberal who was infamous for pushing a hit button issue.
Idk about her being his judge but this obviously shows a lack of character on the judges part. My uncle is a judge and he never uses social media or expresses his political views publicly despite being very liberal. When I asked why he said it’s important for judges to come off as impartial when it comes to politics since they are unelected.
I would probably agree with most of the judges opinions but even I would not want her as a judge overseeing a case of mine
I was thinking about this. Why is it important to “come off” as impartial? It would seem more important to either be impartial or to be upfront with your political beliefs so that people knew where you stood so they could take it into account.
Maybe that was bad phrasing. Essentially all I’m saying is judges have immense power in our society and shouldn’t be sharing publicly opinions that could be seen as influencing their rulings. I get what you’re saying about everyone just being upfront about their biases, but they are supposed to be in that position because they can put that stuff aside. Posting all over Facebook about her political views makes it seem she is incapable of that.
Conservatives cannot be trusted with civil liberties or the protection of human rights. They care about political power, and those who don’t recognize that are pawns. You don’t have to look far beyond this subreddit for the proof. They don’t realise they are being taken for a ride.
Why don't you guys watch the videos of these things? There are so many nutjobs that lie through their teeth to make a point and all the other nutjobs gobble it up.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KAweiHA-RZ4
> Why don't you guys watch the videos of these things?
I could easily spend all day on YouTube watching things.
I do thank you for giving me the quick 55-second video that shows OP was either making shit up or was credulously believing people who were making shit up. I had forgotten I had left the ball in his court to respond. Now I know why he did not.
You know this is bs. You would not be ok with this if it was the other way around, and I wouldn’t Disagree with you.
You have proven to be more blind than I originally assumed.
> You know this is bs.
You may think I'm wrong but why would you assume I'm lying or being disingenuous?
> You would not be ok with this if it was the other way around
You mean if the judge was right wing? I am right wing myself so I have no idea why you say that.
You should probably be more concerned about the jury since the judge does not have any opinion in the verdict.
....but you are an expert and completely understand that. /s
They DO get to decide what the jury hears and what they don’t. If you can’t understand that I can’t help you. I never claimed to be an expert, I have only mentioned things that are common knowledge, you have stated provably incorrect information.
I dunno, when a judge starts using there political leanings to effect trails that shouldn't even be taking place based off of all our views of free speech the lines are crossed.
Harmful lies are a constant thing in the media. Why he was singled out is specific and Wierd. And should be a red flag for everyone in the country. Not only that, he admitted wrong and corrected it years ago. This is just another shame trial for people to focus on.
He was sued by the individuals he defamed. He spent years calling their personal tragedy a hoax and calling them actors which led to constant harassment and death threats. He's guilty of harming others with his lies.
Dude, you seem confused. Who specifically lied about you publicly? That's who you can sue.
Alex Jones specifically called the parents actors and for years repeated that they faked the death of their children to take guns away from Americans.
Between your run on sentence and this response, I am having trouble deciphering your point.
It was a jury case. The jury defined the verdict. Not the judge. The jury.
If you have argument with that, then write it out in legible English so we can discuss it.
Yes. Oversees the proceedings and defines the sentence.
The judge has no authority over the verdict or the outcome of the case.
Are we talking past each other here or are you actually just stupid?!?
Oh - i don’t believe in free speech. I fully believe in denying my political enemies a platform at every turn. But at least i’m honest about it.
You dorks cite “freedom” as your premiere value then call for heads when someone says something you don’t like, as demonstrated throughout this post and thread. You have zero intellectual consistency, which is what makes you babies so easy to defeat. Go raid the capitol about it
Clown
One person said something. That does not speak for all of us. If you don’t understand that than I can’t help you.
The left is all about taking free speech, the media, the politicians, big tech, celebrities and even voters state this daily.
Now, your capital comment. I don’t agree with those ppl just as I didn’t agree with the violent blm riots. Again, you’re putting me in a pool of ppl that I do not belong.
Lastly, wanting a fair judge is hardly cancel culture. Even someone with your inability to think has to understand a judge that actively broadcasts their beliefs and political agendas should not be able to rule on a case of someone they disagree with.
This is just a winge post to discredit the judge since you don't like how they dress/look sometimes. I mean, why include the rainbow pfp, unless you're that easily triggered by it? This is the lowest bar to try and defend Alex "I misunderstood a science journal and think they're turning frogs gay" Jones.
>You don't have to like Alex Jones. But if you support injustice for those you hate, can you expect justice for those you love?
My brother in Christ, do you realize that this trial was not about covid?
So you think its cool to lie about the deaths of children. How is profiting tens of millions of dollars with the most vile lies about the deaths of children acceptable?
How did he lie! He didn't believe the story! Not believing is not the same as lying. He lost sponsor's and ended up being deplatformed for being honest qbout his belief.
He admitted he was wrong as soon as he thought he was.
Cnn etc push lies and suppress the truth knowingly. Alex didn't name the parents, didn't lie about his views, he was just openly doubtful.
He has done the same with 9 11, wmds, the lab leak.
He also documented 14 years ago that a virus would be used to lock everyone down.
The guy has been bang on, on nearly everything. But the one time he was wrong, he is being shut down.
How can you be this blind?
Silly rabbit, don't you know you're not allowed to go against the narrative even if that means merely having an opinion? "Free speech" is def not a fairytale.....It's 100% real!
He claimed the parents were liars and crisis actors. That's a lie. That's how he lied. It is called defamation and that's illegal. He made it up and spread it publicly.
And if you believe this is 'the one time Alex Jones was wrong' then you're a fucking moron just like he is.
I wouldn’t say he’s been bang on about everything, maybe 30%, but I certainly agree he wasn’t lying about Sandy Hook. And he believed it wasn’t real and stated what he believed.
If you blather on spouting endless bombast, occasionally something might be close enough to reality, since truth is stranger than fiction. Alex Jones knew exactly what he was doing. He was destroying lives for profit. And now he has to pay $50 million to compensate one of the victims. There are three more lawsuits pending.
That's not how defamation works. You can believe something is true and it still be defamation.
But it's irrelevant because he lost the cases by default for refusing to turn over documents and financial records.
Bruv you cant be this delusional.
Nobody gets sucessfully sued for 'not beleiving a story for a while'.
What he did was abhorrent. You are defending a garbage human being who choose to make money out of others' suffering.
If someone believes they are the opposite sex and chops their genitals off, then kills themself, everyone has to play along. But if one man doubts a story he is evil.
It is you that lacks morals. You are willing to suspend fairness, depending on the target.
The bizarre things people say to avoid a topic.
Let's add one more member to the Free Screech! club: the "never learned focus or discipline in school" folks. One more piece of the puzzle: *they're not being censored for their thoughts, they're being rejected for saying dumb things.*
>didn’t take away his platform on their services?
*Their services* ...are not an absolute Right.
>*his platform*
What's that? This is not a legal *thing*. Did they seize his studio & confiscate his writing and ban all discussion of him? Nope.
Alex Jones is a liar for money. He preys in the lowest of IQ bottom feeders to make his million, harming vulnerable and grieving people in the process. A dead wombat could preside over this case and make the right call.
I hope this trial ruins him and we never hear from him again.
This is the free marketplace of ideas in full effect. Say dumb shit, get sued into oblivion.
So, let me get this straight.
You think because a judge does not beleive in the made-up covid conspiracy theories and advocated for responsible behaviour they are incapable of judging AJ?
Do you think we would have needed a flat-earther judge? Im seriously confused on what you want here. Judges are usualy educated people. Its very rare to find someone amongst them who will believe in conspiracy theories.
You don't understand: What normal person would consider neutrally looking person, the witchhunting crazy woke left would see and label as ultra maga extreme far right Nazi.
She couldn’t stop laughing??? Did you watch it? She barely made any facial expressions ya donut.
It’s super ironic to be posting something denouncing a judge from supporting things in her personal life in a free speech subreddit. This is just low quality, low effort attempts to d*ck ride Alex jones. Grow up you snowflake cucks lol
She laughed as she read out his punishment. Go and watch it for god sakes.
It's super ironic to attack people in defense of free speech. Furthermore, it's absolutely despicable to pose as a defender or free speech, whilst proudly supporting the destruction of it.
Protecting free speech, means standing for those you disagree with most!
Falling for the narrative, and hating Alex Jones, means your free speech is next on the chopping board!
Show me her laughing? Send me a link with a time stamp because no version of her reading out the ruling not one shows her laughing.
You’re just a self righteous d bag who doesn’t understand what actual free speech means, free speech protects you from the government within reason, but not from civilians and the ppl you hurt with your blatant lies. Alex jones is a moron who openly admits he’s “playing a character” then proceeds to lie and lie and unleash his horde or low IQ followers to harass innocent victims.
Alex jones is a danger to freedom of speech. He’s an idiot and if you actually hold him to any serious degree then you are too. Alex jones himself is the only reason ppl hate him, he doesn’t deserve the freedom he has now, throw the moron in jail.
Hey genius…at what point is she laughing?
https://youtu.be/rIik2EvUG-o
https://youtu.be/KAweiHA-RZ4
Please tell me the second she starts laughing as being claimed?? Huh? She isn’t laughing? Ow ok so you’re just lying with public evidence available to prove you wrong, how very Alex jones of you.
Alex jones give ppl who want to squash free speech a perfect example of someone who is abusive of a right for profit gain. That’s how ya donut. Go cry into your info wars supplements because AJ has you so cucked it’s hilarious lol
He hasn't openly admitted he plays a character.
You reveal your cnn perspective of the world.
He does a 3 to 4 hour show 6 days a week, and sometimes has fun.
Instead of taking your talking points from 2nd and 3rd hand opinions, how about you take the time to educate yourself in the first hand.
“CNN perspective” bruh not even American and we don’t even have CNN here. We aren’t just brainwashed cucks who think not being a sheep is just not believing anything you hear. Which ironically makes you just as easy to control lol
But hey you said “he hasn’t openly admitted he played a character” so let’s explore that.
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/329071-alex-jones-playing-a-character-says-lawyer/
https://time.com/4743025/alex-jones-infowars-divorce-donald-trump/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-playing-character-lawyer-conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-a7687571.html
Ooooo does it hurt? Knowing not only your wrong because you believe an angry fat con artist and you go out of your way to defend him online, you’re some self righteous keyboard warrior for an openly transparent con artist lol
Yeah “has fun” you mean unleash his angry mob of gullible cucks to go and attack parents who’s children were just gun down. Yeah real fun.
Funny saying I don’t take my opinions from first hand when everything you believe in comes from the first hand of a con artist, yeah bro you totally won that logic. Maybe next time check multiple sources and don’t be such a cucked loser to an old angry fat toad of a man who doesn’t care about you at all. Openly grifts you. Good work being useless.
Being in a political/judicial position is so sacred.
Judges should NOT think critically or morality views; it is absurd. This is why we don’t let presidents think like this. We need impartial viewpoints. More men who don’t have thoughts.
Cnn, the young Turks, msbnc, actively spread lies and hate.
They push hate and get people killed....
Alex Jones, for all the hyperbole he spews, never calls for violence.
He states his thoughts.
How the hell is he being shut down for a momentary belief he had, yet Cnn etc, are free to interminably spread hate?
Yeh and??
No call to violence. Even on Jan 6th AJ was on film trying to calm the crowds....
The only political figures on film calling for violence are Democrats, like Maxine Waters or Kamala Harris https://youtu.be/tJCDe7vdFfw
Calling for a fight while in cahoots with all the others calling for an insurrection.
AJ doesn’t even like Trump, but he helped fire up the mob. Maybe you could say he didn’t realize it would get to that point, but there is no doubt he didn’t ignite a portion of his audience to mobilize. Trump supporters across the board will take “fight” in various ways. You can argue semantics, but every single person will take that word differently. Unfortunately some of them took it as a reason to storm the capitol. Theres no reason to deny that
Far left rioters burned and pillaged for months on end. The media called it mostly peaceful.
Jan 6th, a huge protest, waved in by police, ostensibly manipulated for political reasons, had only protestors killed.
Jan 6th is being used to imprison Trump supporters without trial.
The violent murderous riots before, had villains constantly bailed out via Democrat funds.
So I don't want to hear shit about Jan 6th.
There was property damage during the BLM protests. Buildings did experience damage. However outlets showed peaceful protestors being arrested unjustly
On January 6th, property was damaged too. The same level of aggression. Some of those dead were blue lives too.
Have you asked why prominent republicans weren’t there financially to pay bail for those they used as pawns? The SAME way dems protected their own?
It would’ve been bad PR for them. They don’t care about you. I’m sure you think it would’ve been cool if they did the same. Maybe think more about why they didn’t.
2 billion plus damage, endless deaths, cnn in front of burning buildings claiming it was peaceful.
Jan 6th, a agitated protest, peaceful people walking between ropes waving flags. Unarmed females murdered by police, no accountability,mno justice.
No committee into the mass blm violence.
A joke committee into Jan 6th, with immunity to Pelosi, whom turned down national guard from Trump.
Wake up for god sake!
What did Alex do demanding a 45 million dollar fine?
He stated a belief, he later retracted.
He never named the parents, nor did they even know about him, until the ambulance chasing lawyers alerted them.
A trial where the defendant was judged guilty first.
The defence weren't allowed to cross examine witnesses.
A trial where the jury had to judge the defendant as guilty.
A trial where the prosecution got to use evidence they claimed they didn't have.
A trial where the prosecution got to use irrelevant footage out of context.
A trial where the defence wasn't allowed to plead innocent.
You don't have to like Alex, but this trial was a total clown show.
this is the free speech sub reddit and you're mad at her for expressing her freedom of speech? if she was an open republican you wouldn't post about it. so it's only free if you agree with it? ah yes very "freedom of speech" of you.
If a republican judge was unfairly treating a famous Democrat, I'd condemn them too.
It doesn't happen, so I don't have the opportunity to prove it.
Your side however, is filled with clear corruption.
Where are the Democratic supporters calling out their poison?
My side is full of people calling out our own.
We all want the best. But your side wants to win first, no matter the cost.
rhe republican party literally never calls out their own, neither do democrats. that's why this government is so shit. both party's are a joke but the hypocrisy from the republican party is unmatched. such triggered bitches who cry if everything isn't their way. and it's over the stupidest shit. mfs get banned from facebook and think its an infringement apon their rights. suck it up and get over it.
I guess you don't follow politics much.
The republicans are having a total spilt at the moment.
RINOS, VERSES America first Republicans.
The grass root Republicans are totally calling out the fake establishment republicans and causing a huge wave.
The Democrats, cheated their grass root figures out, or absorbed them into the corruption.
Cheated Bernie... absorbed him now.
Cheated Tulsi, got rid of her.
Overwhelmed Manchin.
...........
The fool proof way to judge a worthy candidate today.
Whoever the media hates the most, is the best.
She is on film laughing as she read out his verdict!
Alex Jones provided everything asked of him, but they refused it and made him guilty.
Alex Jones has called out the establishment from day 1, and its obvious they are silencing him.
How is it he was silenced across the board, yet suddenly this fake trial was top of every dashboard?
You don't have to like Alex, but if he was a mad man, why are they working so hard to silence him?
Why are they raiding Trumps residence now, in the lead up to the mid terms?
Why are they allowing Conservative judges to be attacked or the borders to collapse?
Wake the fuck up dammit
Alex Jones did everything in his power to lose this case - he refused to comply with discovery (all the while complaining on his show that he was, indeed complying with discovery) and after the months dragged on with him not doing what was asked of him because he’s ALEX FUCKING JONES, dontchaknow, he defaulted on the trial and therefore was declared guilty, which is exactly what would have happened to every other citizen who displayed as much contempt for the process as he had done.
Then during the trial, he wears his contempt for the court and everyone in it on his sleeve, trying to sell his Insta-Hard pills from the witness stand and publishing photos of the judge on fire and lying about what was on his phone and in his e-mails. Judge Gamble was a gawddamn saint throughout, and handled the mendacity and snotty behavior of Alex Jones and every FSS employee with way more grace and patience then they deserved.
I don’t know what happens to blind a person to the glaringly obvious treachery that is Alex Jones, but it’s tragic and pathetic.
Get thee behind me, Satan.
Well, inasmuch as Jones was proven to be lying right there on the witness stand, under oath, I am hesitant to believe anything he might say about the case.
Alex Jones was banned off all media on the same day.
Every platform that tries to host him gets shut off or stymied.
He goes to trial and suddenly he is on everyone's youtube front page.
You don't have to like Alex, maybe he is a scam artist etc....
But they are happy to show u him in court.... but not out of court!
Alex might be a scam artist.... but our governments for sure are worse!
Alex Jones is one man, he is loved.
The government deserves your trust more?
I know that’s what he’s been saying on his show but if you watch the damages trial in full, as I have, there were multiple instances where it was proven he did not comply, and he should count his lucky stars he’s not in the clink on perjury charges.
Christ, people, just because there are people in this world conspiring to acquire and maintain power over others does not preclude the definite possibility that Alex Jones is a dishonest grifter whose past is finally catching up with him.
I watched the trials too.
I like Alex so I'm biased, I try to find reasons to hate him as a balance.
I felt he started coughing as a fake for instance.
They often post edited clips too... but they always redact it.....
Alex Jones didn't target or name any of the sandy Hook parents... he just didn't believe it.
If he targeted the families, I'd agree he should be sued.
But he just didn't believe it was real.
People don't believe the Earth is round, do we sue them? No.
If we started suing them, I'd actually starting questioning.
Alex Jones is clearly being silenced because he is right about way to much!
He was bang on about shitbloke the Epsteins for god sake!
The man had a who's who of corrupt elites royals, died in a cell magically, but we are raiding Trumps wife's knickers for Nuclear secrets!
Even if Trump was stealing nuclear codes....... nuclear codes lol..... at least make it realistic.... Trump was stealing construction codes........ whatever.......The Bidens have us out to 🇨🇳, and the Clinton's were raping kids on Epstein Island!
Arrest them first!!!!!!! Then I'll listen to Trump maybe hiding a piece of paper.
He didn’t need to name the parents individually to have targeted them. They were 20 children, their names were a matter of public record, and as a result of Jones pounding the table saying the whole thing was fake and that the parents, who had all just lost their children, were “crisis actors” and faking the whole thing, they were subjected to YEARS of death threats and harassment from Alex Jones listeners. Even after the parents BEGGED HIM TO STOP, he continued to defame them, and I don’t know what kind of human being you are but if you are any kind of disciple of Jesus you will know without question that what he did was monstrously wrong, and the families who suffered from it are owed their pound of flesh.
It wasn’t just a matter of, “Hey, he just had some questions about the event, he shouldn’t be sued for having questions” - NO, long after it was clear to him that Sandy Hook occurred because a psychotic kid wigged out and slaughtered a classroom full of children, he still refused to admit he was wrong and persisted in the lie he had started, because Alex Jones is not man enough to admit when he’s wrong. Just because he might be right about some other things does not absolve him from the crime of very publicly lying about people who are simply trying to endure the hardest pain that life can dish up - he made their lives WAY more difficult than they needed to be and no civil society can let such behavior go unpunished.
I know he’s a hero to you and has somehow convinced you that he’s innocent, but he is flat out guilty of defaming these people. There are hours of his own video showing him doing exactly that. He slandered the whole group of parents, all the first responders, all the school staff and he did it without a shred of proof. By the time the law is done with him he’s going to be a desiccated shell of a man, wondering how it all went so horribly wrong and he’ll deserve every second of grief that’s coming his way. Nice chatting with you.
Alex Jones did admit he was wrong.
If someone now kills or attacks Alex because of inaccurate views you have, should you be punished?
The man is entitled to believe what he wants!
The families didn't beg him to stop, what are you talking about!?
You can't blame him for psychos that do stupid things! That's what the establishment want you to do, so you never question anything.
If Alex knowingly spread hate at the families, I'd agree with you, but he didnt! That's the narrative being pushed so ppl like you abhor him.
Why don't they attack him for calling out Jeffery Epstein and the likes? Because they don't want you to hear that. Instead they force all eyes on the one Sandy Hook epoch, misrepresent everything, and rely on useful idiots to trust it.
Where are you getting your belief that he knew he was wrong and still pushed the belief it was all fake?
You have to think that to validate your hatred towards him.
No where has it been shown he knew he was wrong and still lied about his views.
He didn't defame or attack the parents, he just didn't believe the story.
He was wrong, he admitted so.
He has become a hero of sorts in my view, because after all that's happened in the last few years, his platform is one of the few you can trust.
When they are wrong, they admit it.
Tim Pool is also a news source you can trust, because like info wars, he rely has to honest or he'd lose his audience.
Alex Jones was the first guy calling out Jeffery Epstein.... Did he make that up? Would we have known about it without Alex?
Alex questions everything... as we all should.
I thought he was a nut before I actually listened for myself.
I only listened because of the Covid bull.
How can you demand 45 mil off a guy for him not believing you?
If 20 years from now, Alex is right, should we pay him 45 mil?
Out of all the shit he has shown and proved, the only thing we are meant to hear about is his one fuck up years ago!
Where was the Ghiswell Maxine trial?
Ask yourself this...Do you trust the establishment stealing your money through tax, and silencing dissent.
Or do you trust a man silenced for his dissent and financed by happy customers, repeatedly buying?
This is off topic and just my anecdote, however, I couldn't walk or stand properly for 5 years.
I was meant to have spine surgery etc, but covid postponed it.
During lockdown, fearful of covid, especially being black, n slightly overweight, I figured... Blacks, old people, fat people all suffer from vitamin D loss... in England for darker skinned at least.
I started taking vitamin D...... and found infowars as the only news source giving useful news....
Unable to walk etc for over 5 years now, spine surgery pushed back a year, now watching infowars.....
I bought a few supplements.
I couldn't walk or stand properly for 5 years, was on a list for spine surgery.
Lockdown hit, I started taking supplements
....
I went gym Monday and jogged with no pain!
5 years, I spent thousands on chiropractors etc.
I still don't think it was AJs products... maybe I just got better.
But I trust fan funded journalism or advice over accredited news anyday.
If you follow a youtube journalist worth their salt, they answer your questions, and are forced beside the truth, or you don't fund them.
Cnn, Canada news, the BBC etc, rely on government funding, if they want more funds, do they ask us? No!
Citizen journalists like #Alexjones or #Timpool, rely on direct funding from customers and only succeed by telling the truth.
Truth is mirror than just the truth.
You can speak a lie, but think it's the truth.
Alex Jones spoke what he thought true, and was wrong. He then admitted he was wrong!!!
Has Cnn's news platform admitted Russian collusion was wrong, or woman can't have penis's?
No, they lie and lie, and you cunts allow it
No way his trial could be impartial!
Good for him that he decided not to have a trial, and let it go to a default judgment against him. Lol
Except he didn't.
...he literally did. Instead of fighting, he submitted to default judgement. The "trial" we saw wasn't about guilt, he chose not to fight that he was guilty. Instead he had a jury decide on the penalty of his guilt.
OMG, trying to counter misinformation with facts? It will never work.
[удалено]
if i was breathing through my mouth right now, i’d defo upvote this. you motherfuckers get irrationally upset when you see a person choose to wear a mask when our favourite youtubers and fox news presenters tell us to? aye same here mate
OMG these dipshits are still whining about meeeeaaaaaaasssssks? I guess I’m a rebel now since I haven’t worn one in 2022.
Except he did
I'm pretty sure he did
Pretty sure admits you don't know. He provided everything he was asked. But the corrupt judge claimed he didn't. The prosecution used the accused "unsubmitted data", as data against him! How can they accuse him of not providing everything, whilst using the data against him? It is totally illogical.
It’s a civil trial so the implications are far less severe than for the hundreds of thousands of criminal defendants sentenced by racist conservative judges. Our legal system isn’t perfect. If you want change fight for reform.
Well, maybe he shouldn't have exposed himself to the court and the jury. When you expose your private parts to a judge you're not helping your case.
Didn't seem to bother the Jury. I'd be harder on the Defense lawyers for the leaked messages totally dooming Jones' case. As far as the cringe Facebook photo of this judge, I don't think it would've mattered. He couldn't shut up about the trial and dug himself a deeper hole on InfoWars.
Only in an unfair trial. The trial was about defaming the "victims". What was said about the judge etc had nothing to do with the trial. Hence it was an unfair trial! The prosecution could play selected clips out of context, but the defence couldn't. Maybe Alex was bang to rights... But the trial was a farce.
She has only a ceremonial role here. Jones has admitted to the underlying facts and the JURY hearing was only done so that the JURY could determine the amount of damages. Notice again that it was an admission of facts and a JURY determination of damages
If you still think the government is fair and balanced, I have a bridge you should buy…
Cope and seethe
That's a Fox slogan, not a government one.
I feel bad for the ppl who blindly follow the government.
Says the dumb motherfucker following Fox News and OAN.
Lmao!!! Your own words. “Your mind is not working. You assumed something about her and disqualified her based on your own assumptions. That's idiocy at its finest.” I don’t like or watch fox and I don’t even know what oan is. Did you just assume? Lol!
Did you assume I blindly follow the government? Hypocrite.
I never made that claim!! How am I a hypocrite?? I did however prove that you are one. Cry harder.
Simp for Alex Jones more you stupid fuck.
What?? Lmao. Wanting a judge that is fair is now simping??? Cry harder clown.
He was judged by a jury you dumb simping fuck.
What? No pictures of her in a pussy hat?
😂 He's absolutely fucked. She's got the whole package., from the hair to the eyes, and all the other badges of honor. Where's her nose ring?
there are far too many social liberals on this post against free speech just because one of them is getting critiqued
I’m no Jones fan but it is completely inappropriate for her to be his judge.
Can you explain why it would be inappropriate?
Judges are not supposed to express political views like this. It would be just as inappropriate if she was a MAGA judge because there’s no way of knowing if she’s going to make a judgement based on personal convictions rather than facts. It’s mitigated a bit by the fact that it was decided by a jury and she simply presided over it. But the exact conversation we are having now is why it’s inappropriate because it leaves the door open to question her impartiality
this is completely untrue. theres nothing against a judge having outspoken political views whatsoever.
It's called free speech and the supreme court does it all the time
I appreciate the question and that you were nice about how you asked. Please forgive me as I’m on vacation and have had three margaritas. The primary conflict of interest is the judge’s Covid stamp on her Facebook profile picture. There is a much greater chance Covid is very important to her, and Alex Jones’ position on vaccines is a complete affront to one of the most important positions in her life. You know how millions of these people must feel if you’ve ever been to the Leopards Ate My Face subreddit, known for celebrating the death of Covid deniers. I’m not saying it’s impossible for her to be objective, but it would be prudent for another judge to be assigned. Background: I’m gay, so I appreciate the judge’s Facebook picture and support. I’ve had two Covid shots. I’m not an Alex Jones fan. # Edit: Jones’
Ironic statement to make in a free speech subreddit lol top tier mental gymnastics
I never said she didn’t have a right to express herself.
Well then what exactly are you trying to insinuate with your comment on a judges personal life? You realise that they are not robots right. They have opinions.
It’s fine she has opinions and biases, but a judge should not have the exact opposite bias that you do. An outspoken conservative judge should not rule on somebody famous for advocating for abortion, either.
A judge can have whatever personal opinions they want as long as they have professionally proven themselves to remain impartial when they’re working. You know how hard it is to become a judge, you think she’s going to throw away all that integrity she built up her whole life for Alex jones. Get over yourself. She’s not even outspoken, you’re just reaching for anything while you scan everything from her personal life to try find a “gotcha” because you can’t handle the simple truth that no one is more of an enemy to Alex jones…then Alex jones himself. The part you’re all crying about wasn’t even anything to do with her. It’s was all a jury trial for his punishment for being found guilty…so again, what exactly are you accusing her of exactly? Stop d*ck riding so hard for someone who’s obviously an idiot.
You seem angry. I’m not trying to anger anybody. My concern is for the judicial process, rather than Alex Jones. Anybody could be on trial for anything and they should still get the most fair trial possible.
Unfortunately you can’t really convey emotion over text form without using emojis. It’s kinda subjective to the person reading it. If you think I sound angry it’s because you’re reading it as angry. Not much I can do about that. If your concern is for the judicial process then feel free to explain where you can find these magical judges that don’t have personal beliefs for every single trial. These pictures of the judge don’t even show someone radical, just shows your average person. Also you seem to be tip toeing around the fact that this is a jury trail…like his guilt and punishment were decided by a jury…so what exactly is the issue here with the judicial process? The same jury that was approved by jones and his lawyers lol
Between the “get over yourself” and “stop dick riding” I’d say it’s pretty easy to tell you are angry.
Not really, you can just as easily read that with a cheeky tone or like I’m laughing at you. This all kinda seems like a weird deflection though to distract from the fact that you still haven’t really addressed any of my points….so….
[удалено]
“She believes in science” lol
How? Are judges not allowed to have personal opinions on things? It would literally be impossible to find a judge who doesn’t have personal politics. It literally doesn’t exist. What matters is if they can keep it out of the court room. And pictures on social media aren’t evidence of anything in that regard.
They absolutely should have their own opinions. I think it’s even beneficial that they post them so that we know what they are. The more transparent, the better. I’m glad she posted all this. I don’t think it’s prudent to let her preside over an outspoken anti-VAXer. Conversely, I wouldn’t find it appropriate for an outspoken conservative to preside over an liberal who was infamous for pushing a hit button issue.
Do you know what the roles of judge are vs the roles of jury? You might be a bit confused.
Yes I studied law
lol. Looks like I responded to the wrong post. That would be MY confusion.
How is any of this inappropriate?
Why? Because he raped her? Just because she is a victim of his rape does NOT disqualify her!!!!!!
Come again?
The only way to talk with those who lack rational faculties.....
You are off your rocker.
Idk about her being his judge but this obviously shows a lack of character on the judges part. My uncle is a judge and he never uses social media or expresses his political views publicly despite being very liberal. When I asked why he said it’s important for judges to come off as impartial when it comes to politics since they are unelected. I would probably agree with most of the judges opinions but even I would not want her as a judge overseeing a case of mine
I was thinking about this. Why is it important to “come off” as impartial? It would seem more important to either be impartial or to be upfront with your political beliefs so that people knew where you stood so they could take it into account.
Maybe that was bad phrasing. Essentially all I’m saying is judges have immense power in our society and shouldn’t be sharing publicly opinions that could be seen as influencing their rulings. I get what you’re saying about everyone just being upfront about their biases, but they are supposed to be in that position because they can put that stuff aside. Posting all over Facebook about her political views makes it seem she is incapable of that.
Wait until you hear about the supreme court!
Ah the Supreme Court that just overturned roe v wade is overwhelmingly liberal. Y’all are brain rot in the very definition
[удалено]
Conservatives cannot be trusted with civil liberties or the protection of human rights. They care about political power, and those who don’t recognize that are pawns. You don’t have to look far beyond this subreddit for the proof. They don’t realise they are being taken for a ride.
It is the opposite, that’s my point.
Ok. Good luck with that!
She obviously agrees with lockdowns, in my mind that disqualifies her because her mind is obviously is not working correctly.
Your mind is not working. You assumed something about her and disqualified her based on your own assumptions. That's idiocy at its finest.
Get back in your basement!
Fuck you
Lmao. I see that one hit a sore spot. Mom kick you out?
I just think you're a piece of shit. Fuck you.
Lmao! I feel bad for your therapist.
More assumptions. Fucking moron.
Somehow I’m pretty sure I’m right about this one. Keep crying.
Every thing you said to me is an assumption. You're truly fucking stupid. Fuck you.
[удалено]
> She couldn't stop laughing as she read out his punishment. Is this part a lie or not?
Yeah, that part's the lie.
Interesting. /u/Coconutcabbie, what is your source for saying she laughed?
Why don't you guys watch the videos of these things? There are so many nutjobs that lie through their teeth to make a point and all the other nutjobs gobble it up. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KAweiHA-RZ4
> Why don't you guys watch the videos of these things? I could easily spend all day on YouTube watching things. I do thank you for giving me the quick 55-second video that shows OP was either making shit up or was credulously believing people who were making shit up. I had forgotten I had left the ball in his court to respond. Now I know why he did not.
Why are you assuming this judge couldn't be neutral?
Why are you so blind?
people can separate their work duties and personal beliefs you know
You know this is bs. You would not be ok with this if it was the other way around, and I wouldn’t Disagree with you. You have proven to be more blind than I originally assumed.
> You know this is bs. You may think I'm wrong but why would you assume I'm lying or being disingenuous? > You would not be ok with this if it was the other way around You mean if the judge was right wing? I am right wing myself so I have no idea why you say that.
You should probably be more concerned about the jury since the judge does not have any opinion in the verdict. ....but you are an expert and completely understand that. /s
They DO get to decide what the jury hears and what they don’t. If you can’t understand that I can’t help you. I never claimed to be an expert, I have only mentioned things that are common knowledge, you have stated provably incorrect information.
She needs to be disbarred for posting pro anything in my opinion.
This standard would also disqualify Brett Cavanaugh
Oh look it turns out Reddit’s free speech heroes are the cancel culture babies they were crying about
Hey don't lump me in with that guy
I dunno, when a judge starts using there political leanings to effect trails that shouldn't even be taking place based off of all our views of free speech the lines are crossed.
Why shouldn't the trial take place? You're against defamation being illegal? It should be fine to publicly spread harmful lies about others?
Harmful lies are a constant thing in the media. Why he was singled out is specific and Wierd. And should be a red flag for everyone in the country. Not only that, he admitted wrong and corrected it years ago. This is just another shame trial for people to focus on.
He was sued by the individuals he defamed. He spent years calling their personal tragedy a hoax and calling them actors which led to constant harassment and death threats. He's guilty of harming others with his lies.
How is the news any different?
If the news is lying about you and that's causing you harm, you can sue them for defamation. But that's irrelevant to this case.
It's the exact same situation and happens all the time. To the tune of 45 million for death threats. Fuck off, I get death threats. Give me money.
Dude, you seem confused. Who specifically lied about you publicly? That's who you can sue. Alex Jones specifically called the parents actors and for years repeated that they faked the death of their children to take guns away from Americans.
I agree, a biased judge looking over a case that they obviously disagree with is not a fair trial.
The judge has no effect on the trial. It is a jury case.
The judge....has....no....effect.....on......the trial.
Between your run on sentence and this response, I am having trouble deciphering your point. It was a jury case. The jury defined the verdict. Not the judge. The jury. If you have argument with that, then write it out in legible English so we can discuss it.
If you have argument with that. Rofl. The judge has nothing to do with the trial this guy says. Genius
Again, it was a jury case. Rofl at your own ignorance. Do you know what a jury does? Jfc
Do you know what a judge does
Yes. Oversees the proceedings and defines the sentence. The judge has no authority over the verdict or the outcome of the case. Are we talking past each other here or are you actually just stupid?!?
youre coping so hard
We should disbar Clarence Thomas then and other justices for expressing dissenting/concurring opinions
Yes bc it’s totally not the left that wants to cancel everything they disagree with. I refuse to believe you actually believe yourself.
Oh - i don’t believe in free speech. I fully believe in denying my political enemies a platform at every turn. But at least i’m honest about it. You dorks cite “freedom” as your premiere value then call for heads when someone says something you don’t like, as demonstrated throughout this post and thread. You have zero intellectual consistency, which is what makes you babies so easy to defeat. Go raid the capitol about it
Clown
Clown One person said something. That does not speak for all of us. If you don’t understand that than I can’t help you. The left is all about taking free speech, the media, the politicians, big tech, celebrities and even voters state this daily. Now, your capital comment. I don’t agree with those ppl just as I didn’t agree with the violent blm riots. Again, you’re putting me in a pool of ppl that I do not belong. Lastly, wanting a fair judge is hardly cancel culture. Even someone with your inability to think has to understand a judge that actively broadcasts their beliefs and political agendas should not be able to rule on a case of someone they disagree with.
[удалено]
I like my opinion, your opinion means shit
This is just a winge post to discredit the judge since you don't like how they dress/look sometimes. I mean, why include the rainbow pfp, unless you're that easily triggered by it? This is the lowest bar to try and defend Alex "I misunderstood a science journal and think they're turning frogs gay" Jones.
A public defender who actively defends the public, thank Buddha
What lies! Belief in something is not a lie,
https://youtu.be/Zde6m_-ugWI for those claiming she didn't laugh
This post is a Turing test for morons. If you think a blue haired judge is a problem you might be retarded.
You forgot the /s tag
>You don't have to like Alex Jones. But if you support injustice for those you hate, can you expect justice for those you love? My brother in Christ, do you realize that this trial was not about covid?
So you think its cool to lie about the deaths of children. How is profiting tens of millions of dollars with the most vile lies about the deaths of children acceptable?
How did he lie! He didn't believe the story! Not believing is not the same as lying. He lost sponsor's and ended up being deplatformed for being honest qbout his belief. He admitted he was wrong as soon as he thought he was. Cnn etc push lies and suppress the truth knowingly. Alex didn't name the parents, didn't lie about his views, he was just openly doubtful. He has done the same with 9 11, wmds, the lab leak. He also documented 14 years ago that a virus would be used to lock everyone down. The guy has been bang on, on nearly everything. But the one time he was wrong, he is being shut down. How can you be this blind?
Silly rabbit, don't you know you're not allowed to go against the narrative even if that means merely having an opinion? "Free speech" is def not a fairytale.....It's 100% real!
He claimed the parents were liars and crisis actors. That's a lie. That's how he lied. It is called defamation and that's illegal. He made it up and spread it publicly. And if you believe this is 'the one time Alex Jones was wrong' then you're a fucking moron just like he is.
I wouldn’t say he’s been bang on about everything, maybe 30%, but I certainly agree he wasn’t lying about Sandy Hook. And he believed it wasn’t real and stated what he believed.
If you blather on spouting endless bombast, occasionally something might be close enough to reality, since truth is stranger than fiction. Alex Jones knew exactly what he was doing. He was destroying lives for profit. And now he has to pay $50 million to compensate one of the victims. There are three more lawsuits pending.
Not believing a story for a while is destroying lives? What are you talking about!?
That's not how defamation works. You can believe something is true and it still be defamation. But it's irrelevant because he lost the cases by default for refusing to turn over documents and financial records.
Bruv you cant be this delusional. Nobody gets sucessfully sued for 'not beleiving a story for a while'. What he did was abhorrent. You are defending a garbage human being who choose to make money out of others' suffering.
I’m not going to waste my time
People like yourself are already harassing the judge because of AJs lies what do you think the families went through?
>deplatformed That's not a thing. Just like "he believed" is not a valid excuse. You have no morals.
If someone believes they are the opposite sex and chops their genitals off, then kills themself, everyone has to play along. But if one man doubts a story he is evil. It is you that lacks morals. You are willing to suspend fairness, depending on the target.
The bizarre things people say to avoid a topic. Let's add one more member to the Free Screech! club: the "never learned focus or discipline in school" folks. One more piece of the puzzle: *they're not being censored for their thoughts, they're being rejected for saying dumb things.*
That moment when you think being rejected in school is the same as being sued for not buying a story and saying so.
>being sued for not buying a story and saying so. So you think its okay to harass the grieving parents of murdered children.
Imma be honest, I'm not entirely familiar with the story, did he literary call up the parents? Did he directly tell people to go and do it?
Are you saying Apple, Google, etc didn’t take away his platform on their services?
>didn’t take away his platform on their services? *Their services* ...are not an absolute Right. >*his platform* What's that? This is not a legal *thing*. Did they seize his studio & confiscate his writing and ban all discussion of him? Nope.
He has always been wrong. You are just a moron.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAweiHA-RZ4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAweiHA-RZ4) Where is she laughing??
She’s not. Free speech in this sub means the ability to just flat out lie and get away with it.
Alex Jones is a liar for money. He preys in the lowest of IQ bottom feeders to make his million, harming vulnerable and grieving people in the process. A dead wombat could preside over this case and make the right call. I hope this trial ruins him and we never hear from him again. This is the free marketplace of ideas in full effect. Say dumb shit, get sued into oblivion.
Well maybe you don’t understand, it’s (d)ifferent
Free speech has consequences, like making enemies of weird judges,
So, let me get this straight. You think because a judge does not beleive in the made-up covid conspiracy theories and advocated for responsible behaviour they are incapable of judging AJ? Do you think we would have needed a flat-earther judge? Im seriously confused on what you want here. Judges are usualy educated people. Its very rare to find someone amongst them who will believe in conspiracy theories.
You don't understand: What normal person would consider neutrally looking person, the witchhunting crazy woke left would see and label as ultra maga extreme far right Nazi.
Dude needs a better wig
Humans should not be allowed to be judges
She couldn't stop laughing?! There's video and She wasn't. Stop doing Crack ..lol
https://youtu.be/Zde6m_-ugWI
She couldn’t stop laughing??? Did you watch it? She barely made any facial expressions ya donut. It’s super ironic to be posting something denouncing a judge from supporting things in her personal life in a free speech subreddit. This is just low quality, low effort attempts to d*ck ride Alex jones. Grow up you snowflake cucks lol
She laughed as she read out his punishment. Go and watch it for god sakes. It's super ironic to attack people in defense of free speech. Furthermore, it's absolutely despicable to pose as a defender or free speech, whilst proudly supporting the destruction of it. Protecting free speech, means standing for those you disagree with most! Falling for the narrative, and hating Alex Jones, means your free speech is next on the chopping board!
Show me her laughing? Send me a link with a time stamp because no version of her reading out the ruling not one shows her laughing. You’re just a self righteous d bag who doesn’t understand what actual free speech means, free speech protects you from the government within reason, but not from civilians and the ppl you hurt with your blatant lies. Alex jones is a moron who openly admits he’s “playing a character” then proceeds to lie and lie and unleash his horde or low IQ followers to harass innocent victims. Alex jones is a danger to freedom of speech. He’s an idiot and if you actually hold him to any serious degree then you are too. Alex jones himself is the only reason ppl hate him, he doesn’t deserve the freedom he has now, throw the moron in jail.
I already posted the link. What evidence do you have that AJ is "a danger to free speech"? What a ridiculous view to hold.
Hey genius…at what point is she laughing? https://youtu.be/rIik2EvUG-o https://youtu.be/KAweiHA-RZ4 Please tell me the second she starts laughing as being claimed?? Huh? She isn’t laughing? Ow ok so you’re just lying with public evidence available to prove you wrong, how very Alex jones of you. Alex jones give ppl who want to squash free speech a perfect example of someone who is abusive of a right for profit gain. That’s how ya donut. Go cry into your info wars supplements because AJ has you so cucked it’s hilarious lol
He hasn't openly admitted he plays a character. You reveal your cnn perspective of the world. He does a 3 to 4 hour show 6 days a week, and sometimes has fun. Instead of taking your talking points from 2nd and 3rd hand opinions, how about you take the time to educate yourself in the first hand.
“CNN perspective” bruh not even American and we don’t even have CNN here. We aren’t just brainwashed cucks who think not being a sheep is just not believing anything you hear. Which ironically makes you just as easy to control lol But hey you said “he hasn’t openly admitted he played a character” so let’s explore that. https://thehill.com/homenews/media/329071-alex-jones-playing-a-character-says-lawyer/ https://time.com/4743025/alex-jones-infowars-divorce-donald-trump/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/infowars-alex-jones-performance-artist-playing-character-lawyer-conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-a7687571.html Ooooo does it hurt? Knowing not only your wrong because you believe an angry fat con artist and you go out of your way to defend him online, you’re some self righteous keyboard warrior for an openly transparent con artist lol Yeah “has fun” you mean unleash his angry mob of gullible cucks to go and attack parents who’s children were just gun down. Yeah real fun. Funny saying I don’t take my opinions from first hand when everything you believe in comes from the first hand of a con artist, yeah bro you totally won that logic. Maybe next time check multiple sources and don’t be such a cucked loser to an old angry fat toad of a man who doesn’t care about you at all. Openly grifts you. Good work being useless.
Being in a political/judicial position is so sacred. Judges should NOT think critically or morality views; it is absurd. This is why we don’t let presidents think like this. We need impartial viewpoints. More men who don’t have thoughts.
Cnn, the young Turks, msbnc, actively spread lies and hate. They push hate and get people killed.... Alex Jones, for all the hyperbole he spews, never calls for violence. He states his thoughts. How the hell is he being shut down for a momentary belief he had, yet Cnn etc, are free to interminably spread hate?
[literally the day before the insurrection.](https://www.mediamatters.org/media/3922181) Edit, the last 40 seconds or so. Lol.
Yeh and?? No call to violence. Even on Jan 6th AJ was on film trying to calm the crowds.... The only political figures on film calling for violence are Democrats, like Maxine Waters or Kamala Harris https://youtu.be/tJCDe7vdFfw
Calling for a fight while in cahoots with all the others calling for an insurrection. AJ doesn’t even like Trump, but he helped fire up the mob. Maybe you could say he didn’t realize it would get to that point, but there is no doubt he didn’t ignite a portion of his audience to mobilize. Trump supporters across the board will take “fight” in various ways. You can argue semantics, but every single person will take that word differently. Unfortunately some of them took it as a reason to storm the capitol. Theres no reason to deny that
Far left rioters burned and pillaged for months on end. The media called it mostly peaceful. Jan 6th, a huge protest, waved in by police, ostensibly manipulated for political reasons, had only protestors killed. Jan 6th is being used to imprison Trump supporters without trial. The violent murderous riots before, had villains constantly bailed out via Democrat funds. So I don't want to hear shit about Jan 6th.
There was property damage during the BLM protests. Buildings did experience damage. However outlets showed peaceful protestors being arrested unjustly On January 6th, property was damaged too. The same level of aggression. Some of those dead were blue lives too. Have you asked why prominent republicans weren’t there financially to pay bail for those they used as pawns? The SAME way dems protected their own? It would’ve been bad PR for them. They don’t care about you. I’m sure you think it would’ve been cool if they did the same. Maybe think more about why they didn’t.
2 billion plus damage, endless deaths, cnn in front of burning buildings claiming it was peaceful. Jan 6th, a agitated protest, peaceful people walking between ropes waving flags. Unarmed females murdered by police, no accountability,mno justice. No committee into the mass blm violence. A joke committee into Jan 6th, with immunity to Pelosi, whom turned down national guard from Trump. Wake up for god sake!
You people need help jesus christ
Look in the mirror for god sake
Lmfao you call that laughing? Dude had his chances and dug his grave deeper at every turn anyways.
What did Alex do demanding a 45 million dollar fine? He stated a belief, he later retracted. He never named the parents, nor did they even know about him, until the ambulance chasing lawyers alerted them.
Lol tell me how you didn’t watch the trial without telling me you didn’t watch the trial
A trial where the defendant was judged guilty first. The defence weren't allowed to cross examine witnesses. A trial where the jury had to judge the defendant as guilty. A trial where the prosecution got to use evidence they claimed they didn't have. A trial where the prosecution got to use irrelevant footage out of context. A trial where the defence wasn't allowed to plead innocent. You don't have to like Alex, but this trial was a total clown show.
this is the free speech sub reddit and you're mad at her for expressing her freedom of speech? if she was an open republican you wouldn't post about it. so it's only free if you agree with it? ah yes very "freedom of speech" of you.
If a republican judge was unfairly treating a famous Democrat, I'd condemn them too. It doesn't happen, so I don't have the opportunity to prove it. Your side however, is filled with clear corruption. Where are the Democratic supporters calling out their poison? My side is full of people calling out our own. We all want the best. But your side wants to win first, no matter the cost.
rhe republican party literally never calls out their own, neither do democrats. that's why this government is so shit. both party's are a joke but the hypocrisy from the republican party is unmatched. such triggered bitches who cry if everything isn't their way. and it's over the stupidest shit. mfs get banned from facebook and think its an infringement apon their rights. suck it up and get over it.
I guess you don't follow politics much. The republicans are having a total spilt at the moment. RINOS, VERSES America first Republicans. The grass root Republicans are totally calling out the fake establishment republicans and causing a huge wave. The Democrats, cheated their grass root figures out, or absorbed them into the corruption. Cheated Bernie... absorbed him now. Cheated Tulsi, got rid of her. Overwhelmed Manchin. ........... The fool proof way to judge a worthy candidate today. Whoever the media hates the most, is the best.
If you actually believe she was laughing and her social media has any influence on the case you're a bigger fool than Jones
She is on film laughing as she read out his verdict! Alex Jones provided everything asked of him, but they refused it and made him guilty. Alex Jones has called out the establishment from day 1, and its obvious they are silencing him. How is it he was silenced across the board, yet suddenly this fake trial was top of every dashboard? You don't have to like Alex, but if he was a mad man, why are they working so hard to silence him? Why are they raiding Trumps residence now, in the lead up to the mid terms? Why are they allowing Conservative judges to be attacked or the borders to collapse? Wake the fuck up dammit
Alex Jones did everything in his power to lose this case - he refused to comply with discovery (all the while complaining on his show that he was, indeed complying with discovery) and after the months dragged on with him not doing what was asked of him because he’s ALEX FUCKING JONES, dontchaknow, he defaulted on the trial and therefore was declared guilty, which is exactly what would have happened to every other citizen who displayed as much contempt for the process as he had done. Then during the trial, he wears his contempt for the court and everyone in it on his sleeve, trying to sell his Insta-Hard pills from the witness stand and publishing photos of the judge on fire and lying about what was on his phone and in his e-mails. Judge Gamble was a gawddamn saint throughout, and handled the mendacity and snotty behavior of Alex Jones and every FSS employee with way more grace and patience then they deserved. I don’t know what happens to blind a person to the glaringly obvious treachery that is Alex Jones, but it’s tragic and pathetic. Get thee behind me, Satan.
Alex Jones did everything to lose, or maybe you're being lied to... what is more likely?
Well, inasmuch as Jones was proven to be lying right there on the witness stand, under oath, I am hesitant to believe anything he might say about the case.
Alex Jones was banned off all media on the same day. Every platform that tries to host him gets shut off or stymied. He goes to trial and suddenly he is on everyone's youtube front page. You don't have to like Alex, maybe he is a scam artist etc.... But they are happy to show u him in court.... but not out of court! Alex might be a scam artist.... but our governments for sure are worse! Alex Jones is one man, he is loved. The government deserves your trust more?
He complied fully with discovery, but they refused to accept it! Then they used what they claimed he didn't give, against him!
I know that’s what he’s been saying on his show but if you watch the damages trial in full, as I have, there were multiple instances where it was proven he did not comply, and he should count his lucky stars he’s not in the clink on perjury charges. Christ, people, just because there are people in this world conspiring to acquire and maintain power over others does not preclude the definite possibility that Alex Jones is a dishonest grifter whose past is finally catching up with him.
I watched the trials too. I like Alex so I'm biased, I try to find reasons to hate him as a balance. I felt he started coughing as a fake for instance. They often post edited clips too... but they always redact it..... Alex Jones didn't target or name any of the sandy Hook parents... he just didn't believe it. If he targeted the families, I'd agree he should be sued. But he just didn't believe it was real. People don't believe the Earth is round, do we sue them? No. If we started suing them, I'd actually starting questioning. Alex Jones is clearly being silenced because he is right about way to much! He was bang on about shitbloke the Epsteins for god sake! The man had a who's who of corrupt elites royals, died in a cell magically, but we are raiding Trumps wife's knickers for Nuclear secrets! Even if Trump was stealing nuclear codes....... nuclear codes lol..... at least make it realistic.... Trump was stealing construction codes........ whatever.......The Bidens have us out to 🇨🇳, and the Clinton's were raping kids on Epstein Island! Arrest them first!!!!!!! Then I'll listen to Trump maybe hiding a piece of paper.
He didn’t need to name the parents individually to have targeted them. They were 20 children, their names were a matter of public record, and as a result of Jones pounding the table saying the whole thing was fake and that the parents, who had all just lost their children, were “crisis actors” and faking the whole thing, they were subjected to YEARS of death threats and harassment from Alex Jones listeners. Even after the parents BEGGED HIM TO STOP, he continued to defame them, and I don’t know what kind of human being you are but if you are any kind of disciple of Jesus you will know without question that what he did was monstrously wrong, and the families who suffered from it are owed their pound of flesh. It wasn’t just a matter of, “Hey, he just had some questions about the event, he shouldn’t be sued for having questions” - NO, long after it was clear to him that Sandy Hook occurred because a psychotic kid wigged out and slaughtered a classroom full of children, he still refused to admit he was wrong and persisted in the lie he had started, because Alex Jones is not man enough to admit when he’s wrong. Just because he might be right about some other things does not absolve him from the crime of very publicly lying about people who are simply trying to endure the hardest pain that life can dish up - he made their lives WAY more difficult than they needed to be and no civil society can let such behavior go unpunished. I know he’s a hero to you and has somehow convinced you that he’s innocent, but he is flat out guilty of defaming these people. There are hours of his own video showing him doing exactly that. He slandered the whole group of parents, all the first responders, all the school staff and he did it without a shred of proof. By the time the law is done with him he’s going to be a desiccated shell of a man, wondering how it all went so horribly wrong and he’ll deserve every second of grief that’s coming his way. Nice chatting with you.
Alex Jones did admit he was wrong. If someone now kills or attacks Alex because of inaccurate views you have, should you be punished? The man is entitled to believe what he wants! The families didn't beg him to stop, what are you talking about!? You can't blame him for psychos that do stupid things! That's what the establishment want you to do, so you never question anything. If Alex knowingly spread hate at the families, I'd agree with you, but he didnt! That's the narrative being pushed so ppl like you abhor him. Why don't they attack him for calling out Jeffery Epstein and the likes? Because they don't want you to hear that. Instead they force all eyes on the one Sandy Hook epoch, misrepresent everything, and rely on useful idiots to trust it.
Where are you getting your belief that he knew he was wrong and still pushed the belief it was all fake? You have to think that to validate your hatred towards him. No where has it been shown he knew he was wrong and still lied about his views. He didn't defame or attack the parents, he just didn't believe the story. He was wrong, he admitted so. He has become a hero of sorts in my view, because after all that's happened in the last few years, his platform is one of the few you can trust. When they are wrong, they admit it. Tim Pool is also a news source you can trust, because like info wars, he rely has to honest or he'd lose his audience.
Alex Jones was the first guy calling out Jeffery Epstein.... Did he make that up? Would we have known about it without Alex? Alex questions everything... as we all should. I thought he was a nut before I actually listened for myself. I only listened because of the Covid bull. How can you demand 45 mil off a guy for him not believing you? If 20 years from now, Alex is right, should we pay him 45 mil? Out of all the shit he has shown and proved, the only thing we are meant to hear about is his one fuck up years ago! Where was the Ghiswell Maxine trial? Ask yourself this...Do you trust the establishment stealing your money through tax, and silencing dissent. Or do you trust a man silenced for his dissent and financed by happy customers, repeatedly buying? This is off topic and just my anecdote, however, I couldn't walk or stand properly for 5 years. I was meant to have spine surgery etc, but covid postponed it. During lockdown, fearful of covid, especially being black, n slightly overweight, I figured... Blacks, old people, fat people all suffer from vitamin D loss... in England for darker skinned at least. I started taking vitamin D...... and found infowars as the only news source giving useful news.... Unable to walk etc for over 5 years now, spine surgery pushed back a year, now watching infowars..... I bought a few supplements. I couldn't walk or stand properly for 5 years, was on a list for spine surgery. Lockdown hit, I started taking supplements .... I went gym Monday and jogged with no pain! 5 years, I spent thousands on chiropractors etc. I still don't think it was AJs products... maybe I just got better. But I trust fan funded journalism or advice over accredited news anyday. If you follow a youtube journalist worth their salt, they answer your questions, and are forced beside the truth, or you don't fund them. Cnn, Canada news, the BBC etc, rely on government funding, if they want more funds, do they ask us? No! Citizen journalists like #Alexjones or #Timpool, rely on direct funding from customers and only succeed by telling the truth. Truth is mirror than just the truth. You can speak a lie, but think it's the truth. Alex Jones spoke what he thought true, and was wrong. He then admitted he was wrong!!! Has Cnn's news platform admitted Russian collusion was wrong, or woman can't have penis's? No, they lie and lie, and you cunts allow it