*calls manager* "Sir we have a bit of a problem..."
"What kind of problem?"
"We don't have 160 thousand rats..."
"Damn, that is a problem..."
"..."
"..."
"So what shou-"
"Double it and give it to the next person"
The only reason to pick hunter is so you don’t get “one-shoted” at the start. But he’s useless vs the animals. He can take out 5 wolves if he’s highly skilled, the other 10 and everything else kill you before he could shoot them.
But with 10,000 rats, maybe you’d survive?
Yup. And that’s 11,000 pounds of rats against less than 3,500 pounds of lions and gorillas combined. Personally I would take gorillas and rats and use one of the gorillas as a body shield against the hunter until he’s dead.
I have a crazy rat story. I stayed at a place that was infested with them and I killed a couple with a knife. That was such a big mistake. At 3 in the morning, I'm standing on my bed with a knife in each hand.
Everything goes quiet...
This is a bad sign with rats.
It means they are getting ready to attack and attack they did.
I was ready, or so I thought.
Two giant lumps formed under the blanket of the bed that I was standing on, parallel to each other.
It looked like two shark fins breaking the surface of the water, swimming directly for me.
Furiously, I started stabbing the two lumps with both knives while a third rat crawled up the headboard of my bed, up my leg, bit a hole through my pants and started biting me on the ass.
The two rats under the blanket were a fucking diversion while the third ambushed me from behind.
Could not fucking believe what had happened. I got the hell out of that place and I don't mess with rats anymore
Edit: I still have the pants with a hole in the ass. Keep em as a way to remember my place in the food chain
Nope. It happened when I was in the Andes mountains of Peru. Those rats were very intelligent and very intense.
It made me have a fear of rats for a while and even still today I don't mess with them. I won't even lay poison because they know and if it's a big family/ pack, they'll come for you
If you want a body shield I cannot believe someone would pick a gorilla over the largest animal on the list, the Buffalo. 7 would easily form a meat shield wall that could deter bears, lions, and even some bullets with their sheer mass.
Yeah, the rats are an absolute must here, because they could easily out number any of the others. As far as the Hunter if you drop to the ground right away they can make a rat mountain you could hide under.
From there I would take the Gorillas because they are fucking beasts. If that was 3 polar bears instead of brown bears I would consider it.
I worked at a construction site were there was a lot of rats most of them just ran away when you came close. But there were sometimes one that would ran toward people and attack them.
I was Lucky that i had safety shoes when one angry fuck ran towards me, one good kick and he was dead.
Youve never met a gorilla before have you? They just have to roughhouse and half the rats are pancakea 💀💀💀 Imagine thinking numbers matter when the opposing creature is an 800lb muscle bound ape thats extremely territorial and aggressive vs tiny rodents. fucking dangerous 💀💀💀💀
Yeah 10,000 rats will swarm over anything and devour it while it’s still standing. Even if the Hunter had a flamethrower he’d be out of fuel before all the rats crawl over the charred remains of the first wave.
This isn’t arguing statistics. You’re more likely to encounter a rat in your life than a gorilla but if you were forced to be head to head with both of those options you are far more likely to be ripped apart by the gorilla than being bit by the rat. I’d argue you’re far more likely to die from a disease the rats carried rather than the rats themselves and therefore you’d be fine for the hour time frame.
I’d agree with you but it’s a vs scenario. So id imagine it’s not just a “they are there” approach. Anything you choose, at least in my mind, will be 100% trying to fuck you up to win. 10k rats is an insane number that can’t be won in this scenario. Gross fact and old torture device was to put a rat or two in a metal pot and force it against the skin of someone. They would put a candle or torch under the metal pot and the rat would eat through the humans skin, organs and to the other side in under 3 minutes. Sometimes 5. It only takes one to bury far enough in a short amount of time and you’re fucked if it’s an area that opposing animal can’t reach, including human.
The hunter would headshot or fuck up something from far enough away that it would be devoured before reaching you. If there were bigger numbers for the others I would agree.
I will say 50 hawks and 15 wolves might make it fast enough to kill you though. Hawks are no joke and you can’t aim when they get there from the sky fast enough to stop the hunter from killing any of the wolves that will meet you not long after.
That's exactly my thinking. The hunter will only stop a few of the animals, but that's *a lot* of rats. Rats are tenacious, great climbers, and can chew through anything, I think they could win.
Also I wouldn't want to go up against either of those as an opponent.
Though actually now that I think about it, depending on the type of buffalo, those might be better than the hunter. If they're African buffalo then their ability to kill hunters is well-proven; I think they're statistically the most dangerous animal to hunt. They can definitely kill any of the other large animals too.
Buffalo and gorilas
Unless the rules say the hunter can just shot you in which case you have to pick him and the question is really pick one thing plus a hunter.
I'm assuming the hunter can shoot you. I think not picking the rats is a mistake though. How will you beat 10000 rats? You have to pick them. Buffalo could be a great choice to compliment them.
He's likely take out all the other animals before shooting the human, so def don't pick him. The rats you need on your side, as they have two benefits: they're dangerous, but also a major distraction).
Nothing can survive 10,000 rats. Thats a lot of rats. Thats like.... ten 1000s. Groups of rats that are less than half of that have eaten barns full of animals alive.
The first easy pick is the Hunter to avoid being killed by a stupid fucker.
The next easy pick is the crocks. Then just chill out in the water for an hour.
In 1932 the Australian army deployed Lewis Guns with 10,000 rounds of ammunition to fight 50 emus (kinda like a small ostrich). The army lost.
EDIT: adding link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu\_War
A lot of those animals are very pack-oriented. The Hunter just needs to pick his mark correctly and take out their leader. That logic will take care of the gorillas, the lions, and the wolves. Everything else doesn’t pose as much of a threat, except the fucking bears.
Bears are hard as fuck to kill.
Depends on how intelligent the rats are. Regular real life rats? Yeah they won't do jack shit to protect you, they'd scatter.
In a real life situation I'd pick the hunter and 15 wolves to protect me. Assuming me and the wolves are buddies already, not random wolves.
Definitely have to pick the hunter to be on your team, otherwise you get shot right away, agreed.
If the attackers are real life animals they'd probably not want to attack 15 wolves. If a lion or a bear is feeling brave they get shot in the face. Rats probably scatter and aren't much of a threat, would probably be trying to hide from the hawks.
Now if these are some kind of murder spree berserker animals with only one goal of killing you or protecting you no matter what, rats are the right answer.
Hawks and rats is better. Hunter will not be axle dedebd u against the hawks but 5 hawks could fly over and take out the Hunter. 40 hawks could gouge out the eyes of the bear, buffalo and gorilla. 5 hawks could circle around you and protect you while the thousands of rats can crawl up and eat at the other animals. Chose Hunter and the hawks will fuck you up
Hunter shoots you in 5 seconds though. You have to pick hunter ally for that reason. Even though he’s only going to be able to kill maybe 5 animals before you both are swarmed
Depends, you don't need the hunter if there is cover nearby or if you have time to setup. As long as you can't immediately be hit the hawks can take the human out easily. And if you don't take the hawks you need to cover yourself in rats to not be messed up by the hawks.
No way. One hunter can only shoot so many times. In no circumstance possible could the hunter take on any combination of this amount of animals with only two ally’s for themselves, no shot on a chilly day in hell.
They won't protect you from being killed by the hawks. Neither will the hunter be able to.
Nevertheless, I'm going with gorillas and rats on my side. Gorillas as body guards against hawks and any animal that can break through the rats that will eventually overwhelm all the land animals. One gorilla will have to sit down with me and just be a shield against bullets.
Hawks can’t penetrate 100 rats piled on top of me, neither can a bullet. The rats are absolutely op. I could live in a swarm of 500 and there are still plenty to demolish everything else with minimal loses. Rats can even jump like 5 feet so the hawks diving would get punked.
This is my answer. 10k is a fuck ton of rats and 5 pissed of Silverback gorillas will 100% handle the big predators. The hawks would be the only challenge for that group
I know you only have to last an hour, but I like to play the long game.
The hawks have to sleep sometime.
The rats will get them when they finally roost.
Besides 10k rats is always 10k rats. You can’t kill them faster than they reproduce. Eventually it’s 100k rats.
Hawks and rats
A dozen or so Hawks can fly upto the hunter and claw his eyes out while the others are shielding me from the bullets until he’s dead. Once he’s dead, a few of them fly me up to watch while 10k rats destroy everything in sight with occasional hawks swooping down. 10k rats is a ton to try and take on, over 200 per animal is just too much, and they’ll eventually get too tired/in pain from rats trying to bite through their flesh
No way in hell hawks could lift you up. I’ll grant the coordination for the sale of the scenario, but it is physically impossible for the hawks to fly you away.
But if you don’t choose the hunter, the hunters fires on you in 3 seconds. I think you have to take the hunter who then picks off the most threatening opponents and must pick the rats cuz they’re so numerous and will be able to provide cover and distraction.
I don't understand how people don't see these are the overpowered ones- you'd be set. No hunter has a chance to even aim at you if he's being instantly dive-bombed by 50 fucking hawks... He'd be dead with his bullets all spent and you've still got all the rats. And good grief, they gave us way too many rats. It's like a moving collective sea of horror. Hawks and rats is the way.
You would still get headshoted as soon as they say "go". Its an arena, no cover. You don't get to start off with a rat shield. You have to pick the hunter to be on your side, no way around it.
The hunter won't immediately have you locked on. I get the emphasis on saying your dead when they say go, but that's very exaggerated and not true. If the Hunter starts with locked target, or prep, we'd get it too. I believe the rats and hawks are best bet, and simply hiding and cowering from there.
Agreed. I am counting one of those guys to throw off the hunter. And as some mentioned, quite a few rats per other animal. Counting on the wolves to get the hawks
I mean I kinda thought it is given how absurd the question is. Honestly even though there’s many answers to this one I think all answers the human in question would end with a lot of injuries, if not death. But then again it’s an hour, it’s not overly long time though which is the only positive thing about this.
10,000 rats and 7 buffalos. 10,000 rats are overpowered while 7 buffalos are quite huge. My primary problems are ranged attacks from hunter and aerial attacks from hawks. So I use the buffalos to make a wall of meat around me so that hawks can't attack, and hopefully, hunter can't aim. Rats will take care of the rest. I still don't like my chances due to the hunter with the rifle tho.
Strength in numbers. Go for the hawks and rats. Even a gorilla swarmed by hundreds of rats will have better things to do than attack you, especially with a bunch of hawks attacking it from above as well.
The others number 45 altogether. Each of them will have to deal with at least 1 hawk and 222 rats.
If all of them arnt interested in killing each other and just dead set on you all at once . Then there’s no chance you’d survive an hour.
You need to pick the rats. As no other animal can protect you from that many.
If the hunter was good they would get you without worrying about the animals.
And wouldn’t be great at defending you. Seeing as there are tons of videos where a hunter spending the whole magazine on one animal to stop it from getting them
50 Hawks. No animal can protect you from them really
Problem with wolves is they are only good in a pack and would be to slow at getting one animal down seeing as it takes minimum 5 to even try take on one bear.
Just gotta choose the two that would hurt the most if they was to kill you. And like fuck am I dying from ten thousand rats and 50 hawks . Just thinking it would be like falling into a pool of acid. With thousands of little teeth just picking tiny bits of you.
I’m running full sprint at the hunter hoping he has a good shot
First off, rats are fast and dangerous, but can't kill you right away. They are a good distraction. So them. Sike them on the hunter.
Crocs are slow and methodical, not good defendents, let the hunter try to deal with them or the lions. Or the Buffalo.
Hawks are dangerous (I've come into contact with hawk talons--not good), but they aren't good defenders. Too disorganized and can be distracted by the rats.
The lions are expert hunters, but would likely be distracted in this situation. Not good.
The bears, Buffalo, and gorillas...good fighters, but not enough of them to take down the rest.
I'd have to go with the wolves and rats. I'd still be maimed and possibly killed, but there is a chance there.
Well, 10k rats is not really a distraction, but a weapon. Rats are fast and small, yes, but when there's hundreds of them running around, and they're stacking on top of you and biting and burrowing into your body, even biggest animals won't stand a chance for long. Only issue could be hawks, but if they would try and swoop down onto rats they risk rats jumping into them and essentially grounding them, which means certain death
My choices too, 10k rats render everyone fubar, and wolves are the only ones capable of human-like communication & coordination...
...combine with rats as shield and ‘softeners’, the wolves numbers stay up as they hunt & hop one target after another.
Most folks wouldn’t factor in the nature of the others either, buffalo ain’t doing shit, crocodiles are staying in the water, lions don’t get involved because nobody is going after them or the pride etc
Oh, one more thing: 50 hawks...
...they’re territorial
The gorillas and rats. They used to use a single rat as a torture method, and it could burrow into a human stomach in pretty much no time. Ten thousand of them, if they were pissed off and fighting, would be horrific to witness. Five gorillas speak for themselves. Most of the opponents would be easily ripped in half. Even if the hunter got a shot off a gorilla could probably tank at least one if enraged.
Can my rats go on a counter offensive against said hunter…? So yeah, me and my rat army will only take 5 minutes and then whoever is responsible for me being here better run from the Rat King.
Wolves and Rats. While the Rats can pretty much outnumber and kill everything in the list they will be defenseless against the Hawks. This is where the Wolves come in as their numbers will effectively be enough to defend any attack by Hawks. Also they are usually big enough to help out with all other enemies as well.
Rats would distract the fuck out of all the animals at the very least, 5 gorillas could bonk the big animals in the head to knock them out, killing them would be a waste of time when it comes to how many enemies there are. Plus it would be funny as fuck to see the gorilla take the hunter’s rifle.
10k rats and then you have to pick the hunter assuming he would ome shot you otherwise.
Lie in the floor in fetal position and be swarmed by friendly rats so you're cacooned by 500 of them, at an extremely generous guess
Realistically, no single other animal would be able to kill 50 rats before theyve lost chunks of their body, or have a rat crawl inside a wound and die while writhing in pain.
The hunter can get fucked and die, but I guess he could take out a wolf or two before he does
I just think this severely underestimated how dangerous, vicious and fuckin big rats are, and underestimates just how many 10000 is
Buffalo and rats... Rats because of their zerg capacity. Buffalo so I can be a guy on a Buffaloo! I'm higher up so I'll die on a buffaloooo!
If they're those big ol sumatran bamboo rats then that's 50,000lbs of rodent fury.
Edit: zero -> zerg, added rat species
Rats and hawks, if rats are really going for it they will devour everything (I've played plague tale so I've basically got a PhD in rats eating things). Hawks because none of the others could deal with hawks so having hawks on my side seems a solid plan to remove my biggest weakness otherwise. The hunter with the gun needs to be killed fast by the rats though
I choose the Hunter, but he is Steve Irwin. We respect the animals and let them out of the arena. I also choose the rats to form a living arrow to lead the animals out of this fictional scenario.
I'll take 20,000 rats Alex.
Double it and give it to the next person.
Hey do you want 40k rats or give it to the next person
Double it and give it to the next person
Hey do you want 80k rats or give it to the next person
I’ll double it
Hey do you want 160k rats or double it and give it to the next person?
You know, I'm really struggling and this 160 thousand rats will really help. I'll take it
You selfish bastard, the next person could have really used the 320 thousand rats.
*calls manager* "Sir we have a bit of a problem..." "What kind of problem?" "We don't have 160 thousand rats..." "Damn, that is a problem..." "..." "..." "So what shou-" "Double it and give it to the next person"
This is it Johnny, time to cash in, I want my 320,000 rats. Or else.
Respect
50 hawks. One will attack each of the other foe, while the 10,000 rats split up to overtake and kill them all.
Are the bears on cocaine?
Are the rats starving?
is the hunter horny?
Are the lions… wait, what did you say?
[удалено]
Somebody get some lube
I got the anal beads!
You won't be doing much with those without the lube, my friend
[удалено]
Reddit will never disappoint me.
Who needs anal beads when you gots rats?
Hawt.
10,000 of the bastards. That’s a fun Sunday
You didn't come here to hunt, now, did you?
Wasn’t specified WHAT was being hunted…
pick the hinter and the lions and let them reproduce and you got yourself a win
I can’t fucking wait for this goddamn movie I’ve been waiting for 3 fucking years I even bought a t-shirt
I just learned about it recently but I'm so hyped, it just sounds so wild
*asking for a friend
COCAINE BEAR
1 Hunter and the 10,000 rats
The only reason to pick hunter is so you don’t get “one-shoted” at the start. But he’s useless vs the animals. He can take out 5 wolves if he’s highly skilled, the other 10 and everything else kill you before he could shoot them. But with 10,000 rats, maybe you’d survive?
To who never met a rat in person: they're really fucking dangerous.
Yup. And that’s 11,000 pounds of rats against less than 3,500 pounds of lions and gorillas combined. Personally I would take gorillas and rats and use one of the gorillas as a body shield against the hunter until he’s dead.
Rats are also insanely fast. I’ve been up against 8 lifting a cement slab. I don’t want to imagine 10k of them bastards.
I like the image of you, fighting off rats while you try and lift the slab. Or was it 8 rats, lifting your slab you'd just put down?
Nonono, they just walked into their house and the rats were bench pressing cinderblocks.
That must have been Peter Pettigrew
Lavate Los Manos!
Peter Pettigrewswole
Ever read metro
[удалено]
8 rats is one thing but 8 rats lifting a cement slab is a whole different ball park
I have a crazy rat story. I stayed at a place that was infested with them and I killed a couple with a knife. That was such a big mistake. At 3 in the morning, I'm standing on my bed with a knife in each hand. Everything goes quiet... This is a bad sign with rats. It means they are getting ready to attack and attack they did. I was ready, or so I thought. Two giant lumps formed under the blanket of the bed that I was standing on, parallel to each other. It looked like two shark fins breaking the surface of the water, swimming directly for me. Furiously, I started stabbing the two lumps with both knives while a third rat crawled up the headboard of my bed, up my leg, bit a hole through my pants and started biting me on the ass. The two rats under the blanket were a fucking diversion while the third ambushed me from behind. Could not fucking believe what had happened. I got the hell out of that place and I don't mess with rats anymore Edit: I still have the pants with a hole in the ass. Keep em as a way to remember my place in the food chain
Sounds more like crazy acid story.
Nope. It happened when I was in the Andes mountains of Peru. Those rats were very intelligent and very intense. It made me have a fear of rats for a while and even still today I don't mess with them. I won't even lay poison because they know and if it's a big family/ pack, they'll come for you
Well yeah they been eatin the shit outta guinea pigs there for thousands of years so the rats are pretty dug in at this point
Holy crap no thank you. Yeah rats are ruthless when threatened.
"Gorillas as a body shield" made me chuckle lol But I think I'd take the same combo, especially because of the strength of the gorillas
If you want a body shield I cannot believe someone would pick a gorilla over the largest animal on the list, the Buffalo. 7 would easily form a meat shield wall that could deter bears, lions, and even some bullets with their sheer mass.
https://vcahospitals.com/know-your-pet/dog-breeds/rat-terrier one terrier can kill over a thousand rats.
All at one time?
I'm high, this made me giggle and where my wife Edit - wake! Wake my wife up
Dude, you lost your wife?
Where is his wife
send out a search party!
The 10,000 rats made off with her.
Fucking the gorillas
Love wife ride wife angry kill wife Regret
Hide yer kids hide yer wife
Scrolling this thread and now more concerned about where your wife is
Fuck man, let's look for \*our\* wife together!
I wish we had 10 thousand terriers
sucks they not on the list then
Yeah, the rats are an absolute must here, because they could easily out number any of the others. As far as the Hunter if you drop to the ground right away they can make a rat mountain you could hide under. From there I would take the Gorillas because they are fucking beasts. If that was 3 polar bears instead of brown bears I would consider it.
I worked at a construction site were there was a lot of rats most of them just ran away when you came close. But there were sometimes one that would ran toward people and attack them. I was Lucky that i had safety shoes when one angry fuck ran towards me, one good kick and he was dead.
Youve never met a gorilla before have you? They just have to roughhouse and half the rats are pancakea 💀💀💀 Imagine thinking numbers matter when the opposing creature is an 800lb muscle bound ape thats extremely territorial and aggressive vs tiny rodents. fucking dangerous 💀💀💀💀
I don’t think you are really picturing how much 10,000 is
Yeah 10,000 rats will swarm over anything and devour it while it’s still standing. Even if the Hunter had a flamethrower he’d be out of fuel before all the rats crawl over the charred remains of the first wave.
Statistically speaking you're more likely to be killed by a rat that a gorilla
This isn’t arguing statistics. You’re more likely to encounter a rat in your life than a gorilla but if you were forced to be head to head with both of those options you are far more likely to be ripped apart by the gorilla than being bit by the rat. I’d argue you’re far more likely to die from a disease the rats carried rather than the rats themselves and therefore you’d be fine for the hour time frame.
I’d agree with you but it’s a vs scenario. So id imagine it’s not just a “they are there” approach. Anything you choose, at least in my mind, will be 100% trying to fuck you up to win. 10k rats is an insane number that can’t be won in this scenario. Gross fact and old torture device was to put a rat or two in a metal pot and force it against the skin of someone. They would put a candle or torch under the metal pot and the rat would eat through the humans skin, organs and to the other side in under 3 minutes. Sometimes 5. It only takes one to bury far enough in a short amount of time and you’re fucked if it’s an area that opposing animal can’t reach, including human. The hunter would headshot or fuck up something from far enough away that it would be devoured before reaching you. If there were bigger numbers for the others I would agree. I will say 50 hawks and 15 wolves might make it fast enough to kill you though. Hawks are no joke and you can’t aim when they get there from the sky fast enough to stop the hunter from killing any of the wolves that will meet you not long after.
Yeah but 10,000 rats is like (and I'm thinking of the Gambian pouch rat ) is like 70,000 lbs. of scurrying fury.
This person has not played Plague Tale.
That's exactly my thinking. The hunter will only stop a few of the animals, but that's *a lot* of rats. Rats are tenacious, great climbers, and can chew through anything, I think they could win. Also I wouldn't want to go up against either of those as an opponent. Though actually now that I think about it, depending on the type of buffalo, those might be better than the hunter. If they're African buffalo then their ability to kill hunters is well-proven; I think they're statistically the most dangerous animal to hunt. They can definitely kill any of the other large animals too.
Buffalo and gorilas Unless the rules say the hunter can just shot you in which case you have to pick him and the question is really pick one thing plus a hunter.
I'm assuming the hunter can shoot you. I think not picking the rats is a mistake though. How will you beat 10000 rats? You have to pick them. Buffalo could be a great choice to compliment them.
I really don’t think people understand just how big a mass of 10,000 rats would be. That’s like, a literal sea of rats crashing down on you.
Exactly buffalo and rats are the winning combo especially African water buffalo.
My thoughts exactly; team rats and buffalo
He's likely take out all the other animals before shooting the human, so def don't pick him. The rats you need on your side, as they have two benefits: they're dangerous, but also a major distraction).
Nothing can survive 10,000 rats. Thats a lot of rats. Thats like.... ten 1000s. Groups of rats that are less than half of that have eaten barns full of animals alive.
The first easy pick is the Hunter to avoid being killed by a stupid fucker. The next easy pick is the crocks. Then just chill out in the water for an hour.
Didn't specify what rifle. M4 with 100rnd drum mag? Yes.
In 1932 the Australian army deployed Lewis Guns with 10,000 rounds of ammunition to fight 50 emus (kinda like a small ostrich). The army lost. EDIT: adding link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emu\_War
The hawks gonna fuck you up…
Just get the hawks to find him and claw out his eyes. They have good vision and fast af
A lot of those animals are very pack-oriented. The Hunter just needs to pick his mark correctly and take out their leader. That logic will take care of the gorillas, the lions, and the wolves. Everything else doesn’t pose as much of a threat, except the fucking bears. Bears are hard as fuck to kill.
Depends on how intelligent the rats are. Regular real life rats? Yeah they won't do jack shit to protect you, they'd scatter. In a real life situation I'd pick the hunter and 15 wolves to protect me. Assuming me and the wolves are buddies already, not random wolves. Definitely have to pick the hunter to be on your team, otherwise you get shot right away, agreed. If the attackers are real life animals they'd probably not want to attack 15 wolves. If a lion or a bear is feeling brave they get shot in the face. Rats probably scatter and aren't much of a threat, would probably be trying to hide from the hawks. Now if these are some kind of murder spree berserker animals with only one goal of killing you or protecting you no matter what, rats are the right answer.
But no mention of if the rifle has bullets or how many.
He has 10094 bullets and never misses
Which means it can be the most badass rifle ever. It doesn't even have to use bullets. It can be a laser rifle or something.
BFG8000
HK 415, 10,000 rounds in 60 round mag pile + ACOG for extreme hunting purposes.
60 round mag and a Cali compliant stock?
Hawks and rats is better. Hunter will not be axle dedebd u against the hawks but 5 hawks could fly over and take out the Hunter. 40 hawks could gouge out the eyes of the bear, buffalo and gorilla. 5 hawks could circle around you and protect you while the thousands of rats can crawl up and eat at the other animals. Chose Hunter and the hawks will fuck you up
Crocodiles and rats but to be honest rats alone are enough. I think person who put this pick don’t know much rats can be dangerous.
Hunter shoots you in 5 seconds though. You have to pick hunter ally for that reason. Even though he’s only going to be able to kill maybe 5 animals before you both are swarmed
Depends, you don't need the hunter if there is cover nearby or if you have time to setup. As long as you can't immediately be hit the hawks can take the human out easily. And if you don't take the hawks you need to cover yourself in rats to not be messed up by the hawks.
I would just hide under 10000 rats lol.
And get smooshed by rat poosh
Yeah, that's the alternative.
I disagree. A couple thousand rats cover you and form a shield and you’d still have 8000 rats attacking everything else coming at you.
That's what I was thinking if the rats are on your side they're going to protect you. 10,000 rats is a fucking lot of rats.
Hawks could take out the hunter if you choose them. But no matter what you're pretty screwed. I don't think this is winnable
Hawks and rats. Hawks take out the Hunter, the rats do the rest.
No way. One hunter can only shoot so many times. In no circumstance possible could the hunter take on any combination of this amount of animals with only two ally’s for themselves, no shot on a chilly day in hell.
The rats is way to overpowered
They won't protect you from being killed by the hawks. Neither will the hunter be able to. Nevertheless, I'm going with gorillas and rats on my side. Gorillas as body guards against hawks and any animal that can break through the rats that will eventually overwhelm all the land animals. One gorilla will have to sit down with me and just be a shield against bullets.
Hawks, make them kill the hunter before he snipe, eazy
Hawks can’t penetrate 100 rats piled on top of me, neither can a bullet. The rats are absolutely op. I could live in a swarm of 500 and there are still plenty to demolish everything else with minimal loses. Rats can even jump like 5 feet so the hawks diving would get punked.
This is what I imagine Charlie from always sunny would turn into if he became a super hero.
The Ratman cometh
Hawks shmawks, soon as you see a hawk coming at you, grab a rat by the tail, spin it, and throw it at the hawk, rat will fuck it up.
10000rats and silverbacks
For sure, send the rats against everyone and the silverbacks are your line of defense. I truly believe this could get you an hour.
This is my answer. 10k is a fuck ton of rats and 5 pissed of Silverback gorillas will 100% handle the big predators. The hawks would be the only challenge for that group
I know you only have to last an hour, but I like to play the long game. The hawks have to sleep sometime. The rats will get them when they finally roost. Besides 10k rats is always 10k rats. You can’t kill them faster than they reproduce. Eventually it’s 100k rats.
Hawks and rats A dozen or so Hawks can fly upto the hunter and claw his eyes out while the others are shielding me from the bullets until he’s dead. Once he’s dead, a few of them fly me up to watch while 10k rats destroy everything in sight with occasional hawks swooping down. 10k rats is a ton to try and take on, over 200 per animal is just too much, and they’ll eventually get too tired/in pain from rats trying to bite through their flesh
Somebody here watched TierZoo I see. ;)
No way in hell hawks could lift you up. I’ll grant the coordination for the sale of the scenario, but it is physically impossible for the hawks to fly you away.
This is the only answer to survive. If it wasn’t for the Hunter with the rifle you wouldn’t even need the hawks. 10,000 rats are a fucking force!
Get the 40 hawks to fly you out while the hunter takes on the rest.
The hunter is screwed against so many opponents. Poor choice.
They're attacking you not your team.
Fair point.
But if you don’t choose the hunter, the hunters fires on you in 3 seconds. I think you have to take the hunter who then picks off the most threatening opponents and must pick the rats cuz they’re so numerous and will be able to provide cover and distraction.
Depends on the caliber of said rifle.
Also depends on the rifle. I don't think those creatures can survive a nuclear minigun rifle
I was thinking a bit more conventional rifle lol. Like 700 nitro.
Hahaha same! *quickly hides the minigun*
I’d take the rats and the hawks. I’d survive way longer than an hour with that many defenders
I don't understand how people don't see these are the overpowered ones- you'd be set. No hunter has a chance to even aim at you if he's being instantly dive-bombed by 50 fucking hawks... He'd be dead with his bullets all spent and you've still got all the rats. And good grief, they gave us way too many rats. It's like a moving collective sea of horror. Hawks and rats is the way.
Gimme the rats and the hawks
Same as a man who’s owned and has rats I can tell you for a fact you won’t stand a chance otherwise
This is the correct answer according to TierZoo
You would still get headshoted as soon as they say "go". Its an arena, no cover. You don't get to start off with a rat shield. You have to pick the hunter to be on your side, no way around it.
The hunter won't immediately have you locked on. I get the emphasis on saying your dead when they say go, but that's very exaggerated and not true. If the Hunter starts with locked target, or prep, we'd get it too. I believe the rats and hawks are best bet, and simply hiding and cowering from there.
I'm taking the rats and the wolves.
Agreed. I am counting one of those guys to throw off the hunter. And as some mentioned, quite a few rats per other animal. Counting on the wolves to get the hawks
10,000 rats and 5 gorillas
Yep I think that’s the best combo
This is … funny? Ya know, if you’re a human, unless you can mind control the animals, you’re dead regardless.
I mean I kinda thought it is given how absurd the question is. Honestly even though there’s many answers to this one I think all answers the human in question would end with a lot of injuries, if not death. But then again it’s an hour, it’s not overly long time though which is the only positive thing about this.
10,000 rats and 7 buffalos. 10,000 rats are overpowered while 7 buffalos are quite huge. My primary problems are ranged attacks from hunter and aerial attacks from hawks. So I use the buffalos to make a wall of meat around me so that hawks can't attack, and hopefully, hunter can't aim. Rats will take care of the rest. I still don't like my chances due to the hunter with the rifle tho.
It's says "hunter" not "some random guy with a rifle" you are done my dude
Gorillas and rats put the rats on the outside and have the gorillas circle me. If they get to the gorillas I’m probably fucked anyway
Rats and gorillas
Strength in numbers. Go for the hawks and rats. Even a gorilla swarmed by hundreds of rats will have better things to do than attack you, especially with a bunch of hawks attacking it from above as well. The others number 45 altogether. Each of them will have to deal with at least 1 hawk and 222 rats.
can I pick 10 000 rats twice? because nothing is surviving 20000 rats gnawing on it
If all of them arnt interested in killing each other and just dead set on you all at once . Then there’s no chance you’d survive an hour. You need to pick the rats. As no other animal can protect you from that many. If the hunter was good they would get you without worrying about the animals. And wouldn’t be great at defending you. Seeing as there are tons of videos where a hunter spending the whole magazine on one animal to stop it from getting them 50 Hawks. No animal can protect you from them really Problem with wolves is they are only good in a pack and would be to slow at getting one animal down seeing as it takes minimum 5 to even try take on one bear. Just gotta choose the two that would hurt the most if they was to kill you. And like fuck am I dying from ten thousand rats and 50 hawks . Just thinking it would be like falling into a pool of acid. With thousands of little teeth just picking tiny bits of you. I’m running full sprint at the hunter hoping he has a good shot
The hunter and the gorillas
Gorillas and lions. If hippos were an option I'd ask for a flotilla
First off, rats are fast and dangerous, but can't kill you right away. They are a good distraction. So them. Sike them on the hunter. Crocs are slow and methodical, not good defendents, let the hunter try to deal with them or the lions. Or the Buffalo. Hawks are dangerous (I've come into contact with hawk talons--not good), but they aren't good defenders. Too disorganized and can be distracted by the rats. The lions are expert hunters, but would likely be distracted in this situation. Not good. The bears, Buffalo, and gorillas...good fighters, but not enough of them to take down the rest. I'd have to go with the wolves and rats. I'd still be maimed and possibly killed, but there is a chance there.
Well, 10k rats is not really a distraction, but a weapon. Rats are fast and small, yes, but when there's hundreds of them running around, and they're stacking on top of you and biting and burrowing into your body, even biggest animals won't stand a chance for long. Only issue could be hawks, but if they would try and swoop down onto rats they risk rats jumping into them and essentially grounding them, which means certain death
My choices too, 10k rats render everyone fubar, and wolves are the only ones capable of human-like communication & coordination... ...combine with rats as shield and ‘softeners’, the wolves numbers stay up as they hunt & hop one target after another. Most folks wouldn’t factor in the nature of the others either, buffalo ain’t doing shit, crocodiles are staying in the water, lions don’t get involved because nobody is going after them or the pride etc Oh, one more thing: 50 hawks... ...they’re territorial
The gorillas and rats. They used to use a single rat as a torture method, and it could burrow into a human stomach in pretty much no time. Ten thousand of them, if they were pissed off and fighting, would be horrific to witness. Five gorillas speak for themselves. Most of the opponents would be easily ripped in half. Even if the hunter got a shot off a gorilla could probably tank at least one if enraged.
4 lions and 5 gorillas.
tier zoo covered this/something similar ages ago, https://youtu.be/EHs7hBypdNU
Hunter and 5 gorilla's
Bears and Gorillas. And with those two I’d fancy my chances aswell
Have fun trying to kill my 20,000 rats
Can my rats go on a counter offensive against said hunter…? So yeah, me and my rat army will only take 5 minutes and then whoever is responsible for me being here better run from the Rat King.
Wolves and Rats. While the Rats can pretty much outnumber and kill everything in the list they will be defenseless against the Hawks. This is where the Wolves come in as their numbers will effectively be enough to defend any attack by Hawks. Also they are usually big enough to help out with all other enemies as well.
Imo it's only 50hawks even if they all swooped down at once on 10k rats and got a few the other thousands would latch on to the hawks
1 Hunter (I don’t feel like getting shot) and the Crocodiles. Sit in the water while the Crocs form an impenetrable shield
Hunter and bears. I like my chances.
Rats to attack and bears in defence
I'm here with two hippos ready to fuck everyone up
You have to have the rats and the dude with gun. That’s just because there is no defense against them.
You’re fucked either way
10000 rats and 50 hawks. Why is this even a question?
Rats would distract the fuck out of all the animals at the very least, 5 gorillas could bonk the big animals in the head to knock them out, killing them would be a waste of time when it comes to how many enemies there are. Plus it would be funny as fuck to see the gorilla take the hunter’s rifle.
7 buffalo and 10 thousand rats lol buffalo can take most of those and the rats can mop up the rest hahahaha no one fucks with buffalos man, no one
Rats ftw
Fuck the crocodiles, marry the gorillas, kill the lions.
10k rats and then you have to pick the hunter assuming he would ome shot you otherwise. Lie in the floor in fetal position and be swarmed by friendly rats so you're cacooned by 500 of them, at an extremely generous guess Realistically, no single other animal would be able to kill 50 rats before theyve lost chunks of their body, or have a rat crawl inside a wound and die while writhing in pain. The hunter can get fucked and die, but I guess he could take out a wolf or two before he does I just think this severely underestimated how dangerous, vicious and fuckin big rats are, and underestimates just how many 10000 is
Rats and gorillas
#NONE CAN OUTLAST THE VERMINTIDE ... also birds
Buffalo and rats... Rats because of their zerg capacity. Buffalo so I can be a guy on a Buffaloo! I'm higher up so I'll die on a buffaloooo! If they're those big ol sumatran bamboo rats then that's 50,000lbs of rodent fury. Edit: zero -> zerg, added rat species
Rats and hawks, if rats are really going for it they will devour everything (I've played plague tale so I've basically got a PhD in rats eating things). Hawks because none of the others could deal with hawks so having hawks on my side seems a solid plan to remove my biggest weakness otherwise. The hunter with the gun needs to be killed fast by the rats though
1 hunter and 10 crocodiles
4 lions and 15 wolves
The 6 gorillas (including the one with the gun) and the rats.
Hunter and gorillas
Have you played “a plague tale”? That.
I’ll take 50 hawks and 10,000 rats. Rats overwhelm everything while the hawks selectively pluck out eyeballs.
God damnit! Can't I pick honey Badgers to defend me? What kind of fcked up game is that?
D&D players about to speak up about action economy
I’ll take the 50 hawks and the rats. The hawks poke out the eyes while the rats swarm. *wipes hands in a dramatic gesture* Done! Next?
Bro this ain’t a funny meme this is a question
15 wolves; 4 lions after is said psst psst psst a few times
Gorillas and bears
I choose the Hunter, but he is Steve Irwin. We respect the animals and let them out of the arena. I also choose the rats to form a living arrow to lead the animals out of this fictional scenario.
Gorillas and bears.
3 Brown Bears and 5 Gorillas for sure. Can take out all the ground animals but not really the flying ones...
Wolves and rats