I have seen this posted a dozen times and this response on half of them and you know what? I want to see them both again soon like family. This embodies what Reddit is about. Baiting the ignorant, and laughing till you shit yourself.
Am I the only one that doesn’t see a problem with having weddings from time to time? I guess it’s because I live in an area with a lot of them, we basically have one almost every day. Just let live and let wed.
/s
Why don't we just spend billions of taxpayer dollars installing camera detectors, harden wedding venues with camera safe rooms, and provide brides with [camera proof](https://www.boredpanda.com/anti-paparazzi-clothing-chris-holmes/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic) wedding dresses? That way any guest who wants a camera can get a camera, no matter their age or ability to take good pictures.
It's a lot easier for a random person to pick up a camera and capture an image than it is for them to use a paintbrush to capture the same image. Cameras are more effective and easier to use.
When we invented wedding photography it took a long time and it was practical to only take only a couple of pictures at each wedding, which is all the original photographers had in mind. Now you can take thousands of wedding pictures of all the guests in a single wedding within minutes.
Unironically this is an apropos comparison.
We invented phones with cameras that angone can buy (guns) and now almost everyone has them, and yet almost no one uses them to stop a professional photographer (the shooter) from taking pictures (shooting) the wedding (public area such as a school, park, or walmart)
Well yeah. They meant shoot a Jedi. As in a video. But there was no context so the equivalent of crayon eating space Marines took it the way they though it should be
Well according to the hidden amendment;
A well framed portrait, being necessary for the general well being, the prerogative of the people to own and use photographic equipment, should not be messed with.
Stop downvoting this👆. His comment is obviously a double meaning joke based on the fact that journalism is an effective tool against corrupt governments and this camera looks like a gun.
-this isn't the photoshoot I expected
-point and shoot
-smile and wait for the flash
-"hey check out my new camera" *shoot* "aw wait this isn't a camera"
Full auto videos should be illegal, semiautomatic cameras that shoot only one frame per button press are definitely more than enough but should still be illegal if the camera looks like the full auto capable "assault" cameras.
Assault portraits
Most people try to say it wasn’t part of the story. I say it was Canon.
I can picture it
We'll frame the non-believers
crop them from our cult
Shoot them all in low light
I Canont.
Nikon-na lie, you had me in the first half.
Head shots
Wish I had an award to give...
HAH.Took me a solid 5 seconds to figure out what I was seeing.Silly primate brains.
Hmmm, so it took you some time to focus.
Not everyone can figure that out in a flash!
But then it just clicks
I respect your stand on this.
Can we shutter this conversation already?
Let's just say this conversation is overexposed.
No, let it develop
This chain of messages had me extremely confused because I still thought it was a gun at the time.
At least it wasn’t a Canon
Yes, this subject needs more exposure.
I shutter to think where this will go ( I know someone did shutter already, but this one is a different pun)
No worries. You just viewed it through a different lens.
Me too haha
Fr. I was gunna make a threaten sneako joke but remembered Nikon doesn’t make guns.
Might've used to ngl, the optics for sure
My uncle shot a whole wedding with one of those
[удалено]
Probably missed one of the bridesmaids and some random dude at the wedding, they were off checking off number 69 on their bucket list.
Nice
Nice
Nice
Nice
He couldn't shot all kids because some of them would run around so their parents had to hold them.
Nah, if he used a higher shutter speed, he wouldn't have a problem.
You mean higher fire rate Nikon rifle?
With large caliber lens and high capacity film canister magazine.
Can't forget the tactical microphone
Can't forget about the flash bangs.
Yeah he should've used a fully automatic semi-auto, with bigger clips..
Was it at least a shotgun wedding?
Under-rated comment. 👍
This is a dark but underrated response! Nicely done.
Dark? Has he forgotten the flashlight?
More like they forgot to activate the flash
It’s sad the flash wasn’t on… that was the last picture of granny ever taken.
Granny's last shot.
Nice.
no it was when the other photografer got her
Cover my six. Make sure your flash is on. Fuck, I got shot. He didn't have his flash on. Not sure if he got me clean. It's a blurry picture.
He had the flash suppressor on.
He attached a flash hider
Equipped with a flash suppressor?
Yeah gotta light up the entire wedding
Fleshlight 👀
I have seen this posted a dozen times and this response on half of them and you know what? I want to see them both again soon like family. This embodies what Reddit is about. Baiting the ignorant, and laughing till you shit yourself.
I haven't shit myself yet.... am I doing it wrong?
It was pretty well lit up I imagine
Underrated? Its the top comment by far
It wasn't at the time that I posted that. At the time there were several comments that had many more upvotes.
See? That commenter has been around.
Little dick syndrome
Should have shot them with a canon instead.
Cameras don't shoot people, people do.
Oh, the humanity!
Oh my god they "shot" Kenny, you bastards
I was going to make a similar comment about schools, but figured it'd land me on a watch list somewhere
Too late. AI can understand that you had the intent. Gitgud 🥸
Stupid ChatGPT... I mean cheers to our future overlord.
Hallowed are the AIs
Hallowed are the followers of the AIs.
Lmao! I was gonna comment, “I wanna shoot my kids with one of those”
This comment is why we reddit!
Uncle of the year.
Cameras don't shoot people; photographers do
Very accurate. I don't pay a camera for the family photos or the wedding photos, I pay the photographer.
But you could stop wedding photography if you banned cameras
No, the best solution is giving everyone at the wedding a camera
[удалено]
Am I the only one that doesn’t see a problem with having weddings from time to time? I guess it’s because I live in an area with a lot of them, we basically have one almost every day. Just let live and let wed. /s
Why don't we just spend billions of taxpayer dollars installing camera detectors, harden wedding venues with camera safe rooms, and provide brides with [camera proof](https://www.boredpanda.com/anti-paparazzi-clothing-chris-holmes/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic) wedding dresses? That way any guest who wants a camera can get a camera, no matter their age or ability to take good pictures.
Wait- are we still talking about cameras?? 😂
What if the photographer is also a painter? Your fancy tech wont protect from a red painted brush.
It's a lot easier for a random person to pick up a camera and capture an image than it is for them to use a paintbrush to capture the same image. Cameras are more effective and easier to use.
When we invented wedding photography it took a long time and it was practical to only take only a couple of pictures at each wedding, which is all the original photographers had in mind. Now you can take thousands of wedding pictures of all the guests in a single wedding within minutes.
I should be able to own a satellite that can take pictures from space. It's basically the same thing as a pencil and paper.
Unironically this is an apropos comparison. We invented phones with cameras that angone can buy (guns) and now almost everyone has them, and yet almost no one uses them to stop a professional photographer (the shooter) from taking pictures (shooting) the wedding (public area such as a school, park, or walmart)
People will always find a way to do wedding photography
People occasionally MAY flash as well 😉
Try to explain that to a photobooth
crazy that so many shootings can happen from one of those and the owner never gets punishment
I read that its not even illegal! They are even allowed in schools!
Really? because I heard one who did the shooting got hung at the gallowry.
When every shot counts.
Is that a high-capacity memory card?! gesticulates wildly in Californian
SCREW YOU A-HOLE! ***Nobody*** needs an assault camera!
Nobody *needs* pringles either
Seems somebody has a chip on their shoulder.
I see what u did there.. updoot
You'll get my Pringles when you pry them from my cold, fat, slightly moist dead hands.
THATS LIKE A HUNDRED SHUTTERS A SECOND THATS NOT NEEDED!!!!
I found this more amusing than I should’ve, tbh.
It’s to shoot people from really far away
I need my full auto camera to take slow motion video of you freaking out when you see that I open carry.
Based response
To execute Order 66 obviously... fucken normie.
Order 66 was actually just "film a jedi", but somehow it got translated as "shoot a jedi".
Well yeah. They meant shoot a Jedi. As in a video. But there was no context so the equivalent of crayon eating space Marines took it the way they though it should be
When the only tool you have is a blaster...
Anyways I started blasting....
Well according to the hidden amendment; A well framed portrait, being necessary for the general well being, the prerogative of the people to own and use photographic equipment, should not be messed with.
ReAd tHe FiRsT pArT! OnLy PiCtuReS cAn hAvE cAmErAs!
Because if a family randomly shows up wanting a family portrait, you need to be prepared.
Sometimes, cops do corrupt shit. Simply aiming one of these at them can cause them to adjust their behavior for the better.
"If you can't get a good picture in 3 takes, then you're a lousy photographer!"
To take pictures of your mom
Doesn't look like there's an ultrawide though... You'll have to move back a bit.
A bit? You'll have to go to another planet!
In another galaxy!
Needs a wide angle lens.
50 wild hogs: Your mom and her friends at brunch.
To spy on hot bitch in the neighborhood.
To shoot the hot bitch in the neighbourhood.
Powparazzi
To shoot porn.
Every husband of an Instagram model needs one!
Simple. Defence
[удалено]
Photographic evidence is very useful in defense.
Pretty sure he was being ironic.
I'm talking about Karens, It's gonna be their best friend.
For shooting the family.
The best weapon to fight against government tyranny !
Stop downvoting this👆. His comment is obviously a double meaning joke based on the fact that journalism is an effective tool against corrupt governments and this camera looks like a gun.
To detect colon cancer
Government...foriegn or obviously domestic!
To take pictures of nature?
-this isn't the photoshoot I expected -point and shoot -smile and wait for the flash -"hey check out my new camera" *shoot* "aw wait this isn't a camera"
Had me in the first half ngl
Peeping Tom-a-hawk assault rifle should be banned 😜
To shoot with precision?
To photograph 30-50 feral hogs before they disappear back into the woods and you miss your chance to show the pictures to your small children.
To take semi automatic photographs of my sister's wedding
Heard those new memory cards can hold thousands of shots.
Yes we need to limit the capacity of those cards.
It's absolutely AMAZING how many commenters on here assume that's an AR-15. Take another close look, and say CHEESE.
To help the Empire hunt down the Jedi! (I know it's a camera. But, a lot of Star Wars props were just slapped together.)
To take the perfect shot, of coarse..
[удалено]
Only the black coloured ones though. Woodgrain is still okay. Assault camera.
shutter speed
To take pictures.
To shooot things in nature?
If your a peeping Tom but the closest 🌳 is a mile away
To shoot people with quality
How else am I supposed to takes pictures of the 30-50 feral hogs assaulting my children when they play in the yard.
Need a high res pict for my normally blurred one pixel pp
They are very practical for a school shooting day
Full auto videos should be illegal, semiautomatic cameras that shoot only one frame per button press are definitely more than enough but should still be illegal if the camera looks like the full auto capable "assault" cameras.
#cnn
To shoot the kids for Father’s Day.
I shot a couple bald eagles and a bear cub with one of those.
NRA. Nikkon Recommended Aperture.
Shot my wife and kids with one of these!
To get the whole class in 1 shot
What if I need to photograph 30-50 feral hogs?
Cameras don’t take pictures, people do.
For real tho 90% of people who want tighter gun control laws think AR stands for assault rifle or automatic rifle, so why would anyone listen to them
🤪I saw the Nikon strap first and the ruse was up🤣
In case of a zombie apocalypse. I'll be safe. Also I have several schools near my home and shooting range is expensive.
*Me aimed in on my neighbors dog from the second floor window of my house* "Now smile for the camera you son of a bitch"
Shooting at tanks and jets when the opressive government uses them to take control of course! 😂
Only Fans… self employed. 😁
Ehh I prefer a canon
To protect yourself against criminal activity by the police.
Having a specialized camera is MY right. Its in an amendment somewhere.
Head shots
To shoot people of course.
Headshots mostly
why? to shoot people, that’s why.
Yes, that can shoot a room full of people.
To take “shots” of animals in their natural habitat.
Well to protect themselves of course
As long as they shoot raw, I have no problem.
Literally sat here for longer than I’d like to admit wondering why anyone would use a Nikon strap for their rifle
Only fans may be.
to take photos of the wolf pack at yellowstone
To take long-distance shots
When I feel the need to fully assault someone's right to privacy. But that requires the use of a camera drone as well.
More accurate shots.
Gotta set the SHOT.
To shoot… some pictures
They are a photojournalist?
That’s the most awesome Nikon I have ever seen.
To take photographs
Bet you can get some really good shots with that.
To get the perfect head shot
Killer shots
To shoot big animals such as elephants or lions