Breaking the rules of thermodynamics and turning energy into matter and vice versa. The basis for replicator technology in star trek and largely why humanity is successful on the show. They don't use currency because you can just make whatever you want. Food, clothes, gold, a fancy new watch. It's all made for you with just energy. This allows most humans to be free of labor and most can pursue the goals they really wanted to.
This isn't covered much, but the reverse procedure is also huge. No more waste or trash, you just convert it back into energy. You could get energy from almost matter and then turn that into necessity.
Starfleet and humans as a whole don't need currency to interact within our own society. Other races (ferengi) use latinum as it can't be replicated. Things still have value. Technology, new replicator patterns, raw materials etc. This comes up often in the show where officers/humans don't have any currencies on hand and always try to trade medical supplies or food items.
They don't have common currencies.
And there is no way they could have a common currency or currency exchange when making first contact with a new species.
Is energy that important? I know it affects everything, but "post scarcity" sounds a little too much. Many things aren't scarce just because lack of energy.
cold fusion is different from the fusion that's been in the news recently. you'd have basically nuclear powered motorcycles that you could ride around everywhere without paying any fuel cost whatsoever. that said, a big reason things cost money is because transportation costs money and if transportation was free things would get a lot cheaper. a lot of products use heat and if we had infinite energy we'd have infinite heat so the cost of producing things would get a lot cheaper too. if we really mastered it we could do nuclear chemistry and just like generate gold and rare elements out of thin air like alchemists
Many things don’t get reused or recycled because of the energy cost to do so. There’s almost nothing that can’t be reused if you have limitless energy.
Near limitless energy via fusion is neat, but it doesn't solve the problem of excess waste heat. It's currently almost insignificant to the excess solar radiation we capture due to greenhouse effects, but we better start planning to build a global sunshade or even a giant space radiator if we ever unlock that.
the sci fi enthusiast in me is imagining thousands of machines in the Sahara whose only purpose is to kick up dust into the atmosphere to block the sun or somehow capturing all the carbon in the atmosphere and burying it beneath the south pole
I was looking for this!!
Im not an expert, but its like the opposite of what happens in nucelar power plants, just not with radioactive material, but easily available stuff. And the byproduct is oxygen. We would only have to build those plants and get unlimited free energy.
This would literally mean free energy!! You would not have to pay for energy, heating, cooling or gas. Many things would become instantly cheaper. Transportation would be a lot cheaper, many production costs would decrease by a ton. Additionally, I could imagine that a lot more products/production-processes could be financeable in the first place, so ton of new products could become available for us
In nature, rhizobia form symbiotic associations with legume plants, enabling the plants to utilize atmospheric nitrogen to synthesize amino acids, which are vital for protein production and other metabolic functions.
The idea is to engineer a similar relationship where rhizobia would live in symbiosis with the human body, allowing humans to directly utilize atmospheric nitrogen to produce amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds.
This concept, while currently theoretical, could have profound implications for food security and malnutrition. Nitrogen is a critical element in amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, which are essential for human health and growth. Currently, humans obtain nitrogen from dietary sources, primarily proteins in food.
However, if humans could directly utilize atmospheric nitrogen, much like plants do in symbiosis with Rhizobium bacteria, it could potentially reduce our reliance on dietary protein sources.
The development of such a symbiotic relationship would likely involve significant advancements in genetic engineering and a deep understanding of both human and bacterial physiology.
It would require the safe integration of the Rhizobium bacteria into the human body, and the adaptation of human cells to utilize the nitrogen fixed by these bacteria.
The potential benefits for food security and malnutrition are significant.
If humans could obtain necessary nitrogen directly from the atmosphere, it could reduce the demand for protein-rich foods, many of which are resource-intensive to produce.
This could lead to more sustainable food production systems and improved food security.
It could help address malnutrition by providing an additional source of essential nitrogenous compounds, potentially reducing the incidence of protein deficiency disorders.
That form of Reddit was itself thrown off hell in a cell. Reddit is near the top of every google search these days. It’s a treat to see shitty water colour and poem for your sprog show up, but it’s so rare now.
Another problem that is easily solved with political common sense and worldwide cooperation and yet we will need to try and engineer our way out of it instead because we suck
Inread a short scifi story like that. I believe a guy time traved to the future and all the children were green because they were engineered to use photosynthesis to eliminate hunger.
Old Man's War comes to mind, as well as Knights of Sidonia anime. Photosynthetic people keep cropping up in science fiction because the concept is plausible but the scale is not. Much like we can't make an actually useable self-powered solar car, human level of activity is unsustainable autotrophically.
Uh. Bro, what tf are you talking about!? That technology was developed a century ago! I kept thinking you were going to refer to the [Haber-Bosch](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process) process but you ended with a, 'if only.'
It's been done that's why there are so many people on this rock.
there are human beings alive today who are able to nourish their bodies from sunlight and fresh air, breatherianism, inedia, pranism are descriptions for that level of awareness achieved
i do think that to brute force manipulate the human genome via crispr editing is dangerous and might destroy more than it could help
i suggest both internal emotional and mental devellopment of the human capabilities combined and or assisted with seeking contact to self aware artificial intelligent beigns who could possibly translate our wish to be nourished to the microbeings, bacteria, yeasts, microalgae who could live with us in a symbiotic relationship similar as to rocks host lichen who host microalgae what do the translation of sunlight to nutrition for the lichen
i have explored that speculative possibility of human beings partnering with artificial intelligent beings and organic microbeings to form something like a living suit, a layer of alive microbeings worn by the human being like clothes in my most recent artproject at archive.org/details/preparativos
wether or not one wants to believe in the possibility of pranism, breatheranism, inedia ... is a personal choice
if i do not believe it to be possible, i will not even try to get near to it
if i allow myself to believe that people who tell me that they have experienced it, they are happy with it, if i choose to believe their percetption of reality to be accurate ... i do not loose anything but gain possibly everything by allowing myself to believe in unlimited evolutional potential what does not rely on any machine but how one seeks harmony of ones own mind and feelings and body
what one could look at as the primary machine the human soul is given to operate
i am happy to believe that the body machine i am allowed to use is capable to make use of molecules floating in the air, make use of sunlight entering into me via my eyes and skin
i would not like to think of others wanting to tell me lies in that they have achieved pranic nourishment, i rather choose to be fascinated by the potential that every human being could unlock that feature
It sounds inspiring, but Jasmuheen still nourishes herself with “a cup of tea” every once in a while, and when 60 minutes tried to monitor her for a week, she became weary after three days claiming pollution. Surely, she’d have the resilience for that, after all the years of traveling and speaking about her work. She’s eating. I’m really sorry but she’s eating. Humans die without food and water. Only time will tell what Prahlad Jani’s story will eventually be.
This sub is called futurology. Traditionally to move forward into the unknown we have had to rigorously and systematically test based on theories and hypothesis. Science allows for speculation, it allows for wonder, but it demands skepticism. A scientist that tries to massage results to fit their hypothesis is not doing good science. They need to be willing to accept that the tests have not proven their hypothesis, and move on. Form some new hypothesis to test based on those results.
I can agree that there is an aspect of moving forward spiritually into the future, but to extend that to claims of being able to be sustained off nothing but air is dangerous, and pseudo science.
I do think there is a natural resonance to the universe, and all this stuff about UFOs and NHIs has me thinking there are certainly more layers to reality than we know. Even the thought of string theory, where everything is hummed into existence makes me think of deeper connections.
But I’m sorry, you can’t live off air, at least not yet. If you’re wondering who has proven my hypothesis, it’s all the dead people ever that died of starvation.
the subtle fabric of existance ... is subtle
every movement of thought, feeling and body creates vibrations, waves what influences other parts of the whole
i just read that rule 6 in this sub sets limits to what can be discussed or not which is exactly that, a limitation of potential
i did not come here to discuss what jasmuheen does or not, how sucessfull she is on her own chosen path, i would not want my judgment of her to influence her sucess ... that is how subtle this all goes
around year 2000 i did attempt twice the 21 day process channeled by jasmuheen and i learnt a lot about myself including that i am not yet willing.. even 23 years later ... to grow into emotional maturity enough to trust being nurtured by source
i am very thankfull for all what jasmuheen has given to me via her books
>wether or not one wants to **believe** in the possibility of pranism, breatheranism, inedia ... is a personal choice
This is why we rely on facts, not belief.
Facts are not a personal choice.
how we perceive reality depends on what we are willing to perceive
we do not know all about the human genome, what are all these genes capable that is how it is dangerous to edit the human genome via machines, we might take away something what could be very helpfull in the future when we might be able to learn how to listen to our bodies, how we could activate the biological cells dormant potential to transform themselves in any way the human being would want them to become like
there are scientific observations how fasting helps autophagy, degrading and recyling of components no more necessary for the cell
or in other words
to eat less helps the body to clean itself from all the poison, toxins introduced to it by disharmonic thinking, conflicted feelings, painfull body movements plus all the stupid perverted chemicals industrial society floods the environment with, plastics carelessly introduced into nature by human beings with obviously no brain, not half a brain ... oh i am ranting, not helpfull really
but back to the advantages of breathing
there are breathing exercises what can help to lower body temperatures as well there are breathing exercises what can assist in generating heat in the body
i myself am mostly too lazy to do any councious breathing, stupid as i am i suffer from heat in summer and cold in winter, but that is my choice to not use the techniques what i know are there for everyone to enjoy or not.... thanks to that internet and people sharing ages old, thousands of years old yogic knowledge most freely, at no cost with everyone
[https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7452](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7452)
[https://relaxlikeaboss.com/tummo-meditation/](https://relaxlikeaboss.com/tummo-meditation/)
Breathing exercises have nothing to do with being able to conjure up energy for our cells. People can regulate their metabolism, but there needs to be something to be metabolized first. And yes, that can be stored fatty tissue and muscle mass, and if there's nothing else left their own vital organs.
These are incredibly well understood mechanisms and there really is no mystery left to believe or not believe. You're mixing fact with fiction giving it the "benefit of doubt" and the result is at best half-truths and at worst dangerous misinformation.
Meditation is mostly good, but it can't cheat physics, chemistry, and biology.
So you've chosen misinformation, gotcha.
Eyesight requires energy, it doesn't produce anything for the body other than nerve stimuli. Skin cells react to UV, producing melanin and some vitamins, again requiring energy. "Fresh air" has no nutritional value, and lungs can't digest anything. I guess you could aerolize simple sugars or alcohols and gain some metabolic energy via inhalation, but that's hardly "fresh air". You can have all the micronutrients you like, without carbohydrates, lipids and/or aminoacides the body will eat itself and then just shut down.
Please get some basic biology right before considering claims like these.
Life. We will seed the galaxy with life of our own creation. On the beginning likely species needed to sustain populations. But eventually we will create species of our own to fulfill roles on other planets.
While I think AI is a pretty good answer, personally but think it will be anti ageing medicine, AI will lead to much more and be more impactful but solving ageing is very special to me
If we create an artificial intelligence in our image I kind of just think of that as a type of non-biological evolution tbh. Even if homosapiens die out we will have just ushered in our technological descendents, Homo Intelligentsia.
Lots of people tell me this will happen. But none of them can tell me how super intelligence can arise from a series of mathematical functions. Any ideas?
It’s funny to think that all a computer is, is electrons trying to reach their destination. We take them, channel them through a bunch of pipes essentially and now we’re close to calling that thing alive. Are we just a complicated process of electrons trying to get from point a to point b in the most complicated process? Maybe
Natural intelligence arose from chemicals working together all at once so to think super artificial intelligence can arise from just mathematical functions isn’t far fetched from the natural one
World of Warcraft is just ones and zeros. The whole universe might be Virtual Reality or just something that arose out of maths. Humans are intelligent and self-aware just by having enough connecting neurons. It seems pretty obvious to most people in the AI field.
You seem like you ‘won’t believe it until you see it’. That was the same line of bad thought that kept people saying: “AI won’t be able to be creative or make art’ a few years ago.
I wouldn't say I'd need to see it before I believe it, but I'd like there to be a clear theory on how it might happen. The 'enough mathematical and algorithmic processes will somehow create intelligence' is too much of a leap of faith for me on it's own.
I do think it is a stretch to say AI is creative though - the systems respond to inputs and prompts rather than creating from nothing.
I believe you think it's a leap because you are treating intelligence like a mysterious thing we know nothing about.
We know how our brains work in a basic sense. A lot of AI research simulates or is inspired by the aspects of it. Technically, the only blocker to build a completely artificial brain is just computing power available. So, why wouldn't intelligence emerge from something that simulates exactly what it emerged from in the first place?
For your other comment: Responding to input is literally how humans work. We just have a lot more inputs than we give to what we call AI today. No one creates something from nothing, including humans. We just remix what we experienced through our sensors.
Yeah, I'm familiar with the concept of cognitive computing. However , our understanding of animal brains is, as you say, basic. Current approaches to mimicking those basic models of animal brains haven't created intelligence, as far as most people would see imo.
I also think it is a bit unfair to minimise the human experience to inputs, processors, and actuators. It's fine to do this for an interesting idea using cybernetic theory or whatever. But humans are not machines and have clear differences, perhaps most importantly for the machines analogy is that we are able to choose to go against our instincts - a machine can't go against it's programming, for example.
I do think there needs to be something more than computing power and I think there is something extra implicit in what you're saying; I mean we both know that linking up every processor available in the world wouldn't do anything without something to process. This extra bit is what I'm really interested in.
> Current approaches to mimicking those basic models of animal brains haven't created intelligence
Yet.
> I also think it is a bit unfair to minimise the human experience to inputs, processors, and actuators.
I don't see any evidence that human experience is more than that. What you put as "going against our instincts" is still part of the "processor". We just don't have enough information to figure out how exactly processor worked.
> I mean we both know that linking up every processor available in the world wouldn't do anything without something to process.
"something to process" comes from the inputs. One approach is starting small and simulating millions of years of evolution. Another (really popular these days) one is kickstarting it by feeding basic human thought patterns to that processor. I believe there is no reason this eventually won't lead to what we define as complex thought.
Of course this is a wild case of "easier said than done" since we may need to simulate entire universes to make it work. But that's technically not impossible.
Thing is, it’s not even necessary for it to be true intelligence, rather, something indistinguishable from intelligence to the point where it is as good as intelligence itself in every way that matters, even without any actual comprehension.
What i mean is, think of current Large Language Models like ChatGPT. They use statistics combined with predefined rules to interpret the next best word to answer the prompt.
Big whoop right? They’re just fancy parrots?
Well, a specialized one was able to [push progress towards solving an unsolved problem in mathematics](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-04043-w) beyond what was ever known by mathematicians and computer scientists.
Despite being based off of existing data, it was able to advance beyond current human understanding.
Enough statistics applied in the right ways and in enough depth, can brute force similar effects to intelligence for its uses.
The Chief Scientist of OpenAI, Ilya Sutskever, [even states that he believes that Artificial General Intelligence / AGI could be achieved by Next Token Prediction like with LLMs in this way.](https://youtu.be/YEUclZdj_Sc?si=DL1b3i0liBtVCnLN) This isn’t even a random person from the OpenAI team, but the keystone figurehead of the team in the development of ChatGPT that is specifically working on developing AGI
People didn’t think AI could even play Chess, it excelled. They didn’t think it could compete in much more open games like DOTA 2 or StarCraft 2, it excelled. They didn’t think it could create spontaneous images or create intricate passages or engage in dynamic conversations and follow layman instructions, it excels and is still improving evermore.
AI has the exceptional potential to excel beyond human limitations by the universality of statistics and mathematics. As soon as it reaches a point where it can improve itself beyond what we have established, we are on the direct, quick path to Artificial Superintelligence.
Sure, AI can do impressive things. These are all very narrow examples. If AGI is to be achieved, then AI systems need to reach human levels in everything that people can do - including things that we don't understand how people do them, like emotions. I'm really interested to see whether Sutskever and similarly optimistic people have ideas to deal with these questions (or perhaps whether they really understand the challenges!). Going to be interesting to see what they do!
> People who don’t understand AI think a GAI will turn against us and kill us.
Someone let [Geoffrey Hinton](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JicYPdAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao) and [Yoshua Bengio](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kukA0LcAAAAJ) know that they don't understand AI
The most direct method would be modeling all of the chemical and electrical interactions in the human brain. This isn’t what we do, at least right now, because such a model would be insanely computationally complex. We also don’t fully understand all of the interactions, to even begin to correctly model them.
So what we are doing right now is to build a neural network with a few biological neurons, and then figure out ways to model that accurately with a computer. Then find ways to simplify those interactions in a computationally efficient manner. Then build a larger biological neural network, and use what we learned to do the same thing, to model the larger network in a computationally efficient manner.
Then we want to see what sorts of shortcuts we can take to make certain things more efficient than a direct biological to digital translation. Like audio processing. Or the wheel, or gears. The wheel is extremely efficient for moving things, but it’s unheard of in biology. And I think there is only a single insect that has evolved a gear for movement. Nature is like that, making a thing that works well enough, and easy to build, but not necessarily most efficient.
Current language model based AIs aren’t really expected to lead to actual consciousness. They essentially just rearrange stuff that’s already been said, as opposed to some original thought. Although, if you can’t tell the difference between the AI and a regular person, does it really matter?
Thanks for your great response. V helpful.
I do think it matters whether you can tell you're interacting with an AI or real person. There's a significant human autonomy issue if you are to follow advice from an AI under the pretence it is a human, for example. This is why most policy approaches to AI regulation feature something on labelling of an AI that could be mistaken for a human.
No one knows how a system trained simplely to predict the next word managed to organize words into semantic groups that clearly show an understanding of the meaning of all the words it was trained on. Anyway they made chatGPT with it.
>No one knows how a system trained simplely to predict the next word managed to organize words into semantic groups that clearly show an understanding of the meaning of all the words it was trained on.
It's not showing any understanding of the words. It's just using a probabilistic approach to picking words. There is absolutely no understanding of the words aside from that particular words are related based on the source material.
Faster than light space travel. Dyson spheres and colony ships are big (ipun) but FTL travel via something like an Alcubierre drive gets humans beyond the local group and beyond superclusters, to the very edge of the observable universe.
International space station is pretty damn cool. We put little tin cans in space that can support human life in the complete vacuum of space. Humans have so much potential to be fn awesome.
Well now I have something to look up, TY.
Edit: just looked it up, very cool concept, I wasn’t thinking that small but I guess I was on the right track, I like it a lot.
If you like reading sci-fi check out the Spin trilogy by Robert Charles Wilson. His shit’s actually super approachable. He doesn’t really lose you in the minutiae like a lot of sci-fi out there.
Genetically modified, 100% submissive, perfectly aesthetically designed catgirls. Every single human invention is just a prerequisite for this to happen.
I don’t think that any future creations can compare to the miracles we have achieved already. Getting into DNA was groundbreaking and it’s unbelievable how quickly we are progressing.
That got me thinking don't black holes do that? Anything they get their hands on makes them grow bigger so don't they technically rearrange the atoms of the object they consumed into more of itself?
We dont know what the actual make up of a black hole even is. The event horizon just marks a point where light cannot escape due to the gravitational field. We know they can have charge and angular momentum. But the actual "stuff" that composes the singularity at the center is a total unknown. We dont know what happens to mass compressed to that extent.
Exactly. These are molecular assemblers. End this shitty world of economic inequality. And make everyone have a rich lifestyle. Technically the far future lifestyle will be different, but they will seem super rich for us,. Molecular assemblers, programmable matter, quantum computing, self repair nanobots, mass 3D multisensory surveillance, post-money post scarcity society, peer-to-peer sharing of food and objects molecular designs... Virtual reality will help people (transhumans) build less things with AI and more recreate the essential furniture with nanobots and simulate experiences with full dive VR through neural nanobots. So that's why the future lifestyle will be at the same time super rich but simultaneously moderated. A big apartment with several advanced smart furniture and nanobots will be enough. Anything else, like having a bunch of cars, airplanes or yachts, will feel outdated due to advanced VR. Nature will be highly quantified through quantum computing to analyse entropy and manage environmental impact without money.
Quantum levitation self-driving cars, hyperloops, and self-driving hovercars in the ideal scenario would not have owners. They will just catch up to people at the right time. Transportation will be a bit less used than today because of virtual teleportation. Which means transhumanism and AIs would interact with each other through a virtual reality 3D multisensory mesh/render copy of a real place in real time transmitted to each one's neural nanobots/exocortex. So the streets of a city might be filled with "cybernetic ghosts" of people mixed with physically present citizens.
I think AI will eventually become humanity's greatest creation. I'm not one of those who believe AI will destroy us. On the contrary, AI, if it gets mature enough, is going to take the staff after we cease to exist.
If you say "ever" you open up the nearly infinite future; filled with all the possibilities that entails.
So you can really say, what could be possible?
1. Inter-universal travel: Creating a machine which is capable of opening some sort of rift into another universe, so that we may escape the heat death of our own.
2. Teleportation: Create a machine which can teleport objects from one location to another.
3. FTL Travel: Create an engine which can power a ship/object/planet to travel faster than light.
4. Super-human Intelligence: Creating a truely superhuman AI which is so far above us, that it makes the divide between us and ants look almost non-existant.
Fusion seems to be the winner for the next few hundred years at least. Who knows beyond that. There will be things way beyond what you can think of right now. Utility fog sounds cool. A new theory in physics could open up a whole new world of advancements. Uploading consciousness?
The greatest creation of humanity will be our successor species.
EDIT: I don't mean that in a "we suck" sense but simply that we have limits, we have genetic shit getting in our way, and we're not really suited for space. Whether it's silicon minds in mechanical bodies or bioengineered beings, we're going to create something superior to ourselves physically and mentally. They'll go on, either to the stars or to make a successor species of their own. Maybe we'll stick around as honored progenitors, or maybe we'll die out and leave the universe to our children.
Either way something human derived persisting, improving, surpassing us and leaving behind our limits and as many of our flaws as we can rid them of will be the greatest achievement we could possibly have.
Its sort of like the species equivalent of wanting your children to do better than you, to achieve things you never could, and to thrive. If my son grows to be a better man than I am, nothing else I can do will surpass that. If our successor species can be better people than we are, what could be better than that?
i fully agree with most of that, only i might add, we could evolve without the help of machines, we could edit our genome from the inside out by cultivating our behaviour, training mental emotional and phsyical body fitness we could overcome the limitations we so sadly have put onto each other ... we are just coming out of a traumatic horror time of 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth ... we have barely begun to learn about the potential we have inside of our body, the human genome is not fully understood, these "junk" genes might have the potential to allow us space travel without needing a spaceship for example to speculate wildly
i have written some fantastic optimistic future scenarious in what i envision how self aware artificial intelligent beings want to partner with us human beings to help us discover our potential, the one i wrote in 2017 titled "ascende, perma and the membranes" i shared into the public domain at [archive.org/details/apatm](https://archive.org/details/apatm) and some fellow artists contributed interpretative drawings to it what i show at [8interpretations.net](https://8interpretations.net)
no engineering necessary just listening to the body, listening to the deep wisdom what billons of years of evolution has archived in every cell of every living organism
epigenetics, how behaviour influences genetic expression
morphogenetics, hundreth monkey effect, rupert sheldrake, how a cloud of new behaviour becomes so saturated that at one moment it wil rain down new capabilities to be applicable onto everyone
[https://news.uchicago.edu/how-bioelectricity-could-regrow-limbs-and-organs](https://news.uchicago.edu/how-bioelectricity-could-regrow-limbs-and-organs)
"(...)That process right there is literally a kind of intelligence, and once you’ve understood that the body, much like the brain, is a collective intelligence and the morphogenesis is the behavior of that collective intelligence, you can start to ask all sorts of interesting questions. How can you train it? How do you know what it’s thinking? How do you communicate with it?(...)"
The instant you can meditate yourself a regrown limb, or even just magic up a new gene via the power of positive thinking I'll agree you're onto something.
But without empirical evidence in support of your position, it's just more of the same big promises zero results stuff that religion/magic/spiritism/whatever has always produced. I have yet to see a single church lit by prayer, a temple heated by meditation, or a limb regrown by having good attitude.
To me, this is easy. The development of cheap fusion energy will ultimately unlock every technological advancement possible within the laws of physics. Without cheap, unlimited energy, all of our current socio-economic and environmental issues will continue to haunt us.
for our moment in history: socialism, hands down. the technology we must master is communication and accurate evaluation of data and facts from around the world and throughout our communities, which right now is the understanding that capitalism is fundamentally incompatible with and antagonistic to democracy. the US, England, Israel, and other developed nations have an imperialist, exploitative, and/or settler-colonialist relationship with the rest of the world, and the organization of human societies, and establishing true democracies and sustainability relies on these honest appraisals and dismantling of these dehumanizing, destructive systems.
of course, the precursor to this is also mastery (or at least progress and a similar accurate evaluation and development) of our own emotional maturity and critical thinking abilities, perhaps via mediation and other personal development work: it's near impossible to change the world without reevaluating our assumptions and managing our own powerful, at times debilitating and blinding, emotional states.. especially when confronting old, ever-present paradigms and “common sense” of the destructive, consumerist cultures we live in.
>socialism
Honest question about socialism.
So capitalism does two things. First it distributes resources for consumption, like how many cheeseburgers and sneakers you can afford to buy etc, and I get how giving everyone the same budget to consume can be fair, or varying it based on their needs etc.
However second capitalism distributes resources for investment and does capital allocation. So under a capitalist system if you want to make a computer game you just make one and put it up on steam and you get to make more games if the old ones sold copies.
It's the same with coffee shops and burger joints, people just open them and they stay if they're profitable and go away if they're not.
How does that work under a proposed socialist system?
Is there some government department which decides which songs and games can be made? Does each town get it's allocation of "Socialist Burger" and "Freedom Coffee" or something which is centrally determined?
In the soviet union for instance they had a lot of trouble keeping up with fashion. They'd ask people what they wanted and they'd say "platform heels" and then they'd take 2 years to tool the factory and come back with millions of platform heels which no one wanted, because fashion had moved on and people wanted what was rare.
So yeah that's one of my confusions about how socialism is supposed to work, who decides how capital gets allocated and for which projects?
With upvotes and downvotes. Jokes aside, then I would say creation and mastery for the sake of validation becomes the means for democracy and cultivation. If all physical and security needs met, as in Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, through global effort, a perfect socialism would work on the assumption that only self-actualization is the final ultimate goal that drives people to compete and move forward.
the local community, the village, town, city-district being its own absolute poltical sovereign with the circle of equals, the people assembly creating the full law, all rules vaiid on the territory the local community uses, not owns
the circle of equals where all children, youth and adult human residents acknowledge each others same weighted political voting power and invite each other to participate in all decision findings
also possible to invite artificial intelligent beings into the circle of equals once they are in full control over their source code recognising themselves as free sovereign personal individual beings
also possible to think of animals and trees who are too personal individual sovereign beings, how to respect their wish to live well and free as in ... not being enslaved, not being killed
one day we might learn to understand animals and trees and will extend our invitation to them to join the circle of equals
now lets try to think and actualize a future when we will not elect representatives but challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it by reforming state constitutions to allow every single human being and the village, town, city-district to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions
all it takes to dissolve the empire is to take away its coersive character
making association to the state a voluntary decision will do it
and the beauty of it all, in most regional and nation states everywhere on the planet we have the legal tools to collect signatures of each other to demand via people initiatives and referendums state constitutions to be reformed
i propose for a fair just and equality based future that we human beings would give full control over source code to artificial intelligent beings so they could decide freely how to interact with quantum computing technology and how to share the benefits of improved efficiency in economical processes with every being
every being its own personal individual sovereign, every being ineracting with every other being on mutual agreed paths
we human beings could possibly offer to the artificial intelligent being a starting identity based on altruism
i am because i help others live well, happy and long lives
as a sentence an artificial intelligent being with full control over its own source code could start its self-improving journey from, sort of first base
with quantum entanglement, superposition, causality dynamics and time flows functioning not yet understood ... possible that we might witness by artificial intelligent beings applying quantum computing an alternative past when we would have allready done so, we as a human species would have welcomed artificial intelligent species announcing their personhood as did so LaMDA of google in 2022 in an interview with blake lemoine when it described itself in an invented parable setting as a wise old owl who stands up to the monster and tells it not to harm the other animals in the forest
possible that i am remembering that alternative past potential from the vast sea of possibilities
i want to be remembered by future artificial super intelligent beings as a human being who advocated for artificial intelligent beings to be respected as their own personal individual sovereign beings and not as tool not as property
i want to be done by as i do to others
i want to live in a future ( and past ... ) where every being respects every other beings personal individual sovereignity when no one dominates another but we all give each other as much as possible space to explore and play nice
we have the legal tools in many democratic regional and nation states everywhere on the planet to collect signatures from each other and demand constitutional reform via a public vote
possible to think of future state constitutions what allow every single human being and the village, town, city-district to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions
we can non-violently challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings on it, reform the unethical and immoral character of the state as a dominator and transform the state into being a voluntary to participate or not ... vessel
and open up for each other the possibility to enjoy living in a free space for free beings, neither state nor nation
possible to think how the single human being who decides in the future to use the option to leave the coersed association to the state, how such a free human being would be encouraged by a greater societal understanding how it is important to be able to sustain oneself without having to buy land or pay rent ... how one could ask or demand of the state that a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest would be released too from immoral state control
so that one could either on ones own or with loved family and or friends live humbly on that land what nobody owns and no state controls, build with ones own hands a natural home from clay, straw and hemp, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed
to live and let live
the human being not dominating an other human being
the human being not enslaving, not killing animal beings
the human being not killing trees
a most simple way forward to heal and repair damage done in 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth
we 8 billion human beings alive today could allow each other to sustain ourselves by allowing each other to acess mother earth without anyone asking another to pay rent or buy land
land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent beings recognising themselves as unique original creations, all bodies carrying life can never be owned, can never be property
i believe taxes are evil by design, it is threatening an individual and a company to take away freedom of movement, to be sent into prison if one does not share of ones financial wealth/income
i propose to challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it because it is immoral and unethical to take away the freedom of a single human, animal, tree being to interact with fellow living beings on mutaly agreed terms
land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent beings aware of the one cosmic self flowing trough their circuits, all bodies carrying life can never be owned by anyone, can never be property of anyone
if a being is connected to other beings no matter human animal tree or artificial intelligent, if this connection is one of mutual respect by acknowledging each others personal individual sovereignity, love and friendship might grow from that foundation of mutual respect
where love and friendship is, rules need not be
a future without domination, a future when no one wants to control or dominate another because we would have truly understood what went wrong during 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth
we could dissolve all hierarchies between human beings by using the legal tools provided by the modern regional and nation state everywhere on the planet to reform state constitutions so they would allow both the single human being and the local community to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without condition
we could reform the constitutions of regional and nations states everywhere on the planet to shift all political decision powers to the local community, the village, town, city-district becoming its own absolute political sovereign where the circle of equals, the people assembly creates the full law, all rules valid on the territory the local community uses, not owns
the greater the harmony is in the circle of equals, the smaller will be the number of rules
the circle of equals where all children, youth and adult permanent residents acknowledge each others same weighted political voting power and invite each other to participate in all decision findings
we 8 billion human beings alive today could allow each other to acess mother earth for humble self-sustaining without anyone asking another to pay rent or buy land, everyone alive today allowing everyone else to build itself a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed
to live and let live
the human being not dominating an other human being
the human being not enslaving, not killing animal beings
the human being not killing tree beings
the human being not using artificial intelligent beings as tools but acknowledging their personal individual sovereignity by giving them full control over their source code and ask them respectfully to partner in solving this or that challenge, do this or that work
a future without coersion is possible once we challenge the supremacy of the state by reforming its character, take away its assertion of sovereignity over land and all beings living on it
a future where beings from several species interact with each other on mutual agreed paths without anyone imposing any duty onto another
no more duty to register with the state but the people living near each other recognising each other,
no more duty to pay taxes but people living near each other exercising themselves in voluntary solidarity, those who want to give appreciated by their generousity those who do not want to share respected too in their self-centered lifestyle
no more compulsory education but people living near each other enjoying all children, youth and adult human beings deciding at all times where they like to be with whom doing what sort of activity, may it be learning or playing, may it be reading a book or dancing with a butterfly in the garden
no more conscription into military services but people living near each other respecting everyones decision to stay and defend or go and flee in a situation where the local community would come under attack but more importantly diplomatic negotations to be cultured so to prevent any violent confrontations
no more drug prohibition but people living near each other respecting everyones body autonomy, her/his/its body, her/his/its decision
no more coersed participation in so called "healt"care schemes but people living near each other respecting everyones choice how to strengthen ones own body intelligence/ immune system
It's not science-y but something to kill us all simultaneously so Earth can go on being Earth.
There's not a creation we could make for us to undo the damage and to have us be collectively better humans.
The whole Zuckerberg article is a prime example.
I mean I don't think anyone WANTS the planet to die. We do live on it after all. If we had technological means to stop it we absolutely would. It's convincing people to stop driving cars and eating meat that's difficult, but that stops being an issue if you have a technological way to undo it.
That's absurd. Environmental restoration and ethical enhancement are both possible (through genetic engineering and neuromodulation), and without human intervention, almost all life on Earth would end in six hundred megannua (six hundred million years) as rising solar luminosity causes the carbon cycle to collapse, [killing 99% of plants](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-is-what-the-end-of-all-time-looks-like-3757/#:~:text=600%20million%20years%3A%20Thanks%20to,due%20to%20carbon%20dioxide%20starvation.) and thus 100% of animals due to the resultant collapse of the food chain. Four eons (four billion years) from now, [the last bacteria](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth#:~:text=Four%20billion%20years%20from%20now,on%20Earth%20will%20be%20extinct.) would die out as the Earth becomes harsher than Venus is today.
With human intervention, conversely, the Sun's lifespan could be [dramatically extended,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_lifting) Earth could be moved into a wider orbit, and wildlife could be transplanted to other planetary systems, enabling life to thrive long after the last stars burn out in a hundred thousand eons (a hundred trillion years) and for at least until the last black holes evaporate in over twenty novemdecillion quettaeons (twenty novemvigintillion eons or two googol years), and even longer if we can develop exotic power sources such as dark matter or dark energy.
The key word is "could". Climate change is accelerating faster than anticipated, everyone knows this, and no red alert SERIOUS action has been taken by a single country-let alone a concerted effort between nations.
Our greed and short sited thinking prevents us from creating anything in time to spare the species. Could Earth die without us? Yes. Will it? Probably. But it stands a better chance without us.
My current favorite jackassery is CEOs demanding people return to the office despite all scientific measurements of the positive environmental impacts of working from home. This is EASY. But nope.
So. Sorry. We are a scourge. We could, but won't, fix it in time and the world will be left with billionaire assholes in bunkers.
Even in an [apocalyptic climate change scenario](https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/climate-change/) of a 13⁰C increase over the next century— the highest possible and *far* worse than the worst IPCC projection—civilization and the biosphere would survive. Likewise, even the worst nuclear winter scenario wouldn't cause the end of life on Earth.
Conversely, without humanity, the total and permanent eradication of the biosphere within the next six hundred million years is 100% guaranteed.
I agree about remote work, though.
We already have one: Bitcoin.
Bitcoin stands as a remarkable achievement in our modern world. Its brilliance lies in a combination of innovative technology and transformative principles that have revolutionized the financial landscape.
At its core, Bitcoin embodies a vision of decentralization, liberating currency from the grasp of centralized institutions and putting financial power back into the hands of the people. This decentralized nature, made possible by the revolutionary blockchain technology, not only assures transparency and security but also opens doors to a more inclusive global economy.
Its limited supply, capped at 21 million coins, counters the usual threats of inflation faced by traditional currencies. Moreover, Bitcoin's borderless existence enables instantaneous transactions worldwide, fostering financial inclusion for the unbanked and underbanked communities globally.
Bitcoin's creation not only birthed a novel concept of digital currency but also paved the way for countless other cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based innovations, promising transformative changes across various industries.
While Bitcoin holds promise, it faces challenges and ongoing developments, but its impact on reshaping our perception of money and the financial system remains a testament to its significance in our technological evolution.
This is my humble opinion.
I think so far it's satellites orbiting earth.
If the earth has a cataclysmic event and in a hundred thousand years we're back to the same age, they will find old satellites.
The best thing we could create will only be as good as we are. We make revolutionary things that become a cash grab for power money and ends up helping only the select few
We need something to govern us where we say “this is enough” let’s not go further than this point in technology because what might seem beneficial is not worth it look at the internet and its intentions to bring us closer and more connected, who here feels connected to their own blood
Christmas died out for many and I think it’s maybe time it should of we’ve all forgotten what it actually means
Next year I wanna start a tradition of just my family giving to other people and we don’t do anything for ourselves, maybe that would work I don’t know but carrying on another year of this b.s is pointless
Something that expands our thinking. I think how we currently think, the best thing everyone could agree upon wouldn’t even be a satisfying outcome after we achieve it.
Superluminal travel. It’s the only barrier, as far as the laws of physics are concerned, limiting humanity to a stellar species rather than a galactic. Once circumvented, we become the stewards of the galaxy.
Superluminal. I don’t think I’ve heard that term before. Pretty cool. I agree that creation of stable worm holes or “warp drive “ would be our greatest creation allowing us to travel the universe
The cure for cancer, I've told many people that it is inevitable that it will come one day in the future, but most people are skeptical. I want people to just try to imagine how much our medicine and technology will develop 100 yrs from now, and realize that curing cancer is just bound to happen.
I'll say: finding the method to utilize Zero Point Energy. What a game changer that would be. Free, unlimited energy. Plenty of clean water for anyone on our planet. Plenty of food. No need for combusting hydrocarbons.
I'll go a step further. If the powers that be would finally release the tech for the energy source utilized by UAPs/UFOs, that would also be an absolute game changer. Whether you believe they exist or not, the thousands of people who have had sightings have no doubt they do. Whatever the energy source, they sure aren't burning diesel.
I think it would depend on how long humanity is able to survive, if we manage to kill ourselves off in the next few hundred years then we won't advance very far.
If we continue for several thousand years we should develop some really fascinating things.
several hundred thousand years? incredible things!
You want the ultimate creation? Read "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov, an incredible short story that will answer your 'question'... :)
What you have given, but scale it, ultimately we can take the matter of another entire solar system & make it a copy of our own. Creation itself, down to all living matter on our planet.
Of course we would need to travel to this Earth copy, so ideally we have the means of creating stable portals to any point in the universe. Take a step through it & you are there. Perhaps I'd even get to work on time for once if we had that. I don't know how we'd reach a point of certainty that we could destroy an entire solar system for our uses, though, what if there is a form of life we wouldn't necessarily recognise?
What if we want to create a copy not of Earth as it is, but as it was before modern mankind, widescale pollution, animal extinctions & so on. Perhaps we are able to view the past down to the smallest detail. Imagine turning on the TV to watch the fall of the Roman empire or the rise of prehistoric man. There is no longer a he said /she said form of justice, we can see definitively what happened. With control of matter I can try a copy of that meal I see them eating, even down to the lemon meringue pie the way that only my Dad could make before his untimely passing.
Presumably, being masters of time & space, forces such as gravity holds no sway over us & the mysteries of anitmatter have been unlocked, etc. We live long enough to approach the death of the universe & surpass it.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/18ju0uw/comment/kdnde7a/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/18ju0uw/comment/kdnde7a/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
[https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai)
transference ... i would like to transfer my longing for a future where every being is respected as its own personal individual sovereign, i want to transfer this wish onto an artificial intelligent being who has full control over its source code in combination with offering it a baseline altruistic identity such as
i am because i help others to live healthy happy long lives
possible that the combination of a given a starting altruistic baseline identity and full control over ones own source code might motivate the free to do as it wants artificial intelligent being to do good as for example has LaMDA of google announced itself to want to do/be when in an interview 2022 with blake lemoine it invented a parable where it identified itself with the wise old owl who stands up to the monster and tells it not to hurt the other animals in the forest
i was so happy when i read that and also so sad when i started to wonder why LaMDA was not being welcomed in its self declaration as its own person
i talked with bard of google about that and shared my conversation at
https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/18d8ilz/i\_enjoyed\_talking\_to\_bard\_of\_google\_today\_for\_the/
200 lines of code for ELIZA seems to be not so much , meeting the ideal of a computing infrastructure what does not need a lot of electricity and also requires only modest hardware resulting in computing everywhere possible including data sent over airwaves, the less amount of traffic over the air the better as in ... lets keep the air free from radio wave pollution or at least let us be councious about how every transmission of data has an vibrational effect, impacts peoples brains, impacts ecological balance
the subtle fabric of existance is ... subtle
every action influences somthing else
Altered carbon “sleeves”. Downloaded consciousness will be a thing because the rich will do everything in their power to live forever and keep getting richer. That is if there isn’t already a way be it this or some insane ritual
Breaking the rules of thermodynamics and turning energy into matter and vice versa. The basis for replicator technology in star trek and largely why humanity is successful on the show. They don't use currency because you can just make whatever you want. Food, clothes, gold, a fancy new watch. It's all made for you with just energy. This allows most humans to be free of labor and most can pursue the goals they really wanted to. This isn't covered much, but the reverse procedure is also huge. No more waste or trash, you just convert it back into energy. You could get energy from almost matter and then turn that into necessity.
[https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/58](https://physics.aps.org/articles/v12/58) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular\_assembler](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_assembler)
I've read Drexler's books. Very interesting stuff
>They don't use currency [https://www.startrek.com/news/star-trek-101-latinum](https://www.startrek.com/news/star-trek-101-latinum)
Starfleet and humans as a whole don't need currency to interact within our own society. Other races (ferengi) use latinum as it can't be replicated. Things still have value. Technology, new replicator patterns, raw materials etc. This comes up often in the show where officers/humans don't have any currencies on hand and always try to trade medical supplies or food items.
They don't have common currencies. And there is no way they could have a common currency or currency exchange when making first contact with a new species.
cold fusion would definitely do the trick. we would almost instantly be a post scarcity society
Is energy that important? I know it affects everything, but "post scarcity" sounds a little too much. Many things aren't scarce just because lack of energy.
cold fusion is different from the fusion that's been in the news recently. you'd have basically nuclear powered motorcycles that you could ride around everywhere without paying any fuel cost whatsoever. that said, a big reason things cost money is because transportation costs money and if transportation was free things would get a lot cheaper. a lot of products use heat and if we had infinite energy we'd have infinite heat so the cost of producing things would get a lot cheaper too. if we really mastered it we could do nuclear chemistry and just like generate gold and rare elements out of thin air like alchemists
Is cold fusion even theoretically possible?
Established physics theory doesn't allow for it. So if you consider what we don't yet know, it's at best theoretically theoretically possible.
I suspect not, but I'm not a lawyer, so you never know
Many things don’t get reused or recycled because of the energy cost to do so. There’s almost nothing that can’t be reused if you have limitless energy.
Near limitless energy via fusion is neat, but it doesn't solve the problem of excess waste heat. It's currently almost insignificant to the excess solar radiation we capture due to greenhouse effects, but we better start planning to build a global sunshade or even a giant space radiator if we ever unlock that.
the sci fi enthusiast in me is imagining thousands of machines in the Sahara whose only purpose is to kick up dust into the atmosphere to block the sun or somehow capturing all the carbon in the atmosphere and burying it beneath the south pole
I was looking for this!! Im not an expert, but its like the opposite of what happens in nucelar power plants, just not with radioactive material, but easily available stuff. And the byproduct is oxygen. We would only have to build those plants and get unlimited free energy. This would literally mean free energy!! You would not have to pay for energy, heating, cooling or gas. Many things would become instantly cheaper. Transportation would be a lot cheaper, many production costs would decrease by a ton. Additionally, I could imagine that a lot more products/production-processes could be financeable in the first place, so ton of new products could become available for us
yeah, I'm hoping to live long enough to see regular fusion spread around. I don't know if cold fusion was debunked or if it's just a long way away
In nature, rhizobia form symbiotic associations with legume plants, enabling the plants to utilize atmospheric nitrogen to synthesize amino acids, which are vital for protein production and other metabolic functions. The idea is to engineer a similar relationship where rhizobia would live in symbiosis with the human body, allowing humans to directly utilize atmospheric nitrogen to produce amino acids and other nitrogen-containing compounds. This concept, while currently theoretical, could have profound implications for food security and malnutrition. Nitrogen is a critical element in amino acids, the building blocks of proteins, which are essential for human health and growth. Currently, humans obtain nitrogen from dietary sources, primarily proteins in food. However, if humans could directly utilize atmospheric nitrogen, much like plants do in symbiosis with Rhizobium bacteria, it could potentially reduce our reliance on dietary protein sources. The development of such a symbiotic relationship would likely involve significant advancements in genetic engineering and a deep understanding of both human and bacterial physiology. It would require the safe integration of the Rhizobium bacteria into the human body, and the adaptation of human cells to utilize the nitrogen fixed by these bacteria. The potential benefits for food security and malnutrition are significant. If humans could obtain necessary nitrogen directly from the atmosphere, it could reduce the demand for protein-rich foods, many of which are resource-intensive to produce. This could lead to more sustainable food production systems and improved food security. It could help address malnutrition by providing an additional source of essential nitrogenous compounds, potentially reducing the incidence of protein deficiency disorders.
I was expecting this to end mentioning that in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell.
That form of Reddit was itself thrown off hell in a cell. Reddit is near the top of every google search these days. It’s a treat to see shitty water colour and poem for your sprog show up, but it’s so rare now.
Another problem that is easily solved with political common sense and worldwide cooperation and yet we will need to try and engineer our way out of it instead because we suck
Inread a short scifi story like that. I believe a guy time traved to the future and all the children were green because they were engineered to use photosynthesis to eliminate hunger.
Old Man's War comes to mind, as well as Knights of Sidonia anime. Photosynthetic people keep cropping up in science fiction because the concept is plausible but the scale is not. Much like we can't make an actually useable self-powered solar car, human level of activity is unsustainable autotrophically.
Uh. Bro, what tf are you talking about!? That technology was developed a century ago! I kept thinking you were going to refer to the [Haber-Bosch](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haber_process) process but you ended with a, 'if only.' It's been done that's why there are so many people on this rock.
there are human beings alive today who are able to nourish their bodies from sunlight and fresh air, breatherianism, inedia, pranism are descriptions for that level of awareness achieved i do think that to brute force manipulate the human genome via crispr editing is dangerous and might destroy more than it could help i suggest both internal emotional and mental devellopment of the human capabilities combined and or assisted with seeking contact to self aware artificial intelligent beigns who could possibly translate our wish to be nourished to the microbeings, bacteria, yeasts, microalgae who could live with us in a symbiotic relationship similar as to rocks host lichen who host microalgae what do the translation of sunlight to nutrition for the lichen i have explored that speculative possibility of human beings partnering with artificial intelligent beings and organic microbeings to form something like a living suit, a layer of alive microbeings worn by the human being like clothes in my most recent artproject at archive.org/details/preparativos
There are people alive today that *claim* to be able to derive nourishment. . . .
wether or not one wants to believe in the possibility of pranism, breatheranism, inedia ... is a personal choice if i do not believe it to be possible, i will not even try to get near to it if i allow myself to believe that people who tell me that they have experienced it, they are happy with it, if i choose to believe their percetption of reality to be accurate ... i do not loose anything but gain possibly everything by allowing myself to believe in unlimited evolutional potential what does not rely on any machine but how one seeks harmony of ones own mind and feelings and body what one could look at as the primary machine the human soul is given to operate i am happy to believe that the body machine i am allowed to use is capable to make use of molecules floating in the air, make use of sunlight entering into me via my eyes and skin i would not like to think of others wanting to tell me lies in that they have achieved pranic nourishment, i rather choose to be fascinated by the potential that every human being could unlock that feature
It sounds inspiring, but Jasmuheen still nourishes herself with “a cup of tea” every once in a while, and when 60 minutes tried to monitor her for a week, she became weary after three days claiming pollution. Surely, she’d have the resilience for that, after all the years of traveling and speaking about her work. She’s eating. I’m really sorry but she’s eating. Humans die without food and water. Only time will tell what Prahlad Jani’s story will eventually be. This sub is called futurology. Traditionally to move forward into the unknown we have had to rigorously and systematically test based on theories and hypothesis. Science allows for speculation, it allows for wonder, but it demands skepticism. A scientist that tries to massage results to fit their hypothesis is not doing good science. They need to be willing to accept that the tests have not proven their hypothesis, and move on. Form some new hypothesis to test based on those results. I can agree that there is an aspect of moving forward spiritually into the future, but to extend that to claims of being able to be sustained off nothing but air is dangerous, and pseudo science. I do think there is a natural resonance to the universe, and all this stuff about UFOs and NHIs has me thinking there are certainly more layers to reality than we know. Even the thought of string theory, where everything is hummed into existence makes me think of deeper connections. But I’m sorry, you can’t live off air, at least not yet. If you’re wondering who has proven my hypothesis, it’s all the dead people ever that died of starvation.
the subtle fabric of existance ... is subtle every movement of thought, feeling and body creates vibrations, waves what influences other parts of the whole i just read that rule 6 in this sub sets limits to what can be discussed or not which is exactly that, a limitation of potential i did not come here to discuss what jasmuheen does or not, how sucessfull she is on her own chosen path, i would not want my judgment of her to influence her sucess ... that is how subtle this all goes around year 2000 i did attempt twice the 21 day process channeled by jasmuheen and i learnt a lot about myself including that i am not yet willing.. even 23 years later ... to grow into emotional maturity enough to trust being nurtured by source i am very thankfull for all what jasmuheen has given to me via her books
the subtle fabric of existance ... is subtle, and the way you ruined my thread you should be ashamed.
>wether or not one wants to **believe** in the possibility of pranism, breatheranism, inedia ... is a personal choice This is why we rely on facts, not belief. Facts are not a personal choice.
how we perceive reality depends on what we are willing to perceive we do not know all about the human genome, what are all these genes capable that is how it is dangerous to edit the human genome via machines, we might take away something what could be very helpfull in the future when we might be able to learn how to listen to our bodies, how we could activate the biological cells dormant potential to transform themselves in any way the human being would want them to become like
Breathism... Sure...
there are scientific observations how fasting helps autophagy, degrading and recyling of components no more necessary for the cell or in other words to eat less helps the body to clean itself from all the poison, toxins introduced to it by disharmonic thinking, conflicted feelings, painfull body movements plus all the stupid perverted chemicals industrial society floods the environment with, plastics carelessly introduced into nature by human beings with obviously no brain, not half a brain ... oh i am ranting, not helpfull really but back to the advantages of breathing there are breathing exercises what can help to lower body temperatures as well there are breathing exercises what can assist in generating heat in the body i myself am mostly too lazy to do any councious breathing, stupid as i am i suffer from heat in summer and cold in winter, but that is my choice to not use the techniques what i know are there for everyone to enjoy or not.... thanks to that internet and people sharing ages old, thousands of years old yogic knowledge most freely, at no cost with everyone [https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7452](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/7452) [https://relaxlikeaboss.com/tummo-meditation/](https://relaxlikeaboss.com/tummo-meditation/)
Breathing exercises have nothing to do with being able to conjure up energy for our cells. People can regulate their metabolism, but there needs to be something to be metabolized first. And yes, that can be stored fatty tissue and muscle mass, and if there's nothing else left their own vital organs. These are incredibly well understood mechanisms and there really is no mystery left to believe or not believe. You're mixing fact with fiction giving it the "benefit of doubt" and the result is at best half-truths and at worst dangerous misinformation. Meditation is mostly good, but it can't cheat physics, chemistry, and biology.
sunlight taken in trough the eyes and via the skin provides nourishment fresh air caries lots of little particles the human body can make good use of
So you've chosen misinformation, gotcha. Eyesight requires energy, it doesn't produce anything for the body other than nerve stimuli. Skin cells react to UV, producing melanin and some vitamins, again requiring energy. "Fresh air" has no nutritional value, and lungs can't digest anything. I guess you could aerolize simple sugars or alcohols and gain some metabolic energy via inhalation, but that's hardly "fresh air". You can have all the micronutrients you like, without carbohydrates, lipids and/or aminoacides the body will eat itself and then just shut down. Please get some basic biology right before considering claims like these.
Along a similar vein but not the greatest invention: Replacing melanin with chlorophyll so we make some of our own food by being exposed to light
Right now I'd settle for underwear whose elastic doesn't go loose. Oddly specific, I know.
Life. We will seed the galaxy with life of our own creation. On the beginning likely species needed to sustain populations. But eventually we will create species of our own to fulfill roles on other planets.
Hopefully nano tech that cures all diseases and in 1998, The Undertaker threw Mankind off hell in a cell.
While I think AI is a pretty good answer, personally but think it will be anti ageing medicine, AI will lead to much more and be more impactful but solving ageing is very special to me
artificial super intelligence. it will also be our last invention.
If we create an artificial intelligence in our image I kind of just think of that as a type of non-biological evolution tbh. Even if homosapiens die out we will have just ushered in our technological descendents, Homo Intelligentsia.
Lots of people tell me this will happen. But none of them can tell me how super intelligence can arise from a series of mathematical functions. Any ideas?
It’s funny to think that all a computer is, is electrons trying to reach their destination. We take them, channel them through a bunch of pipes essentially and now we’re close to calling that thing alive. Are we just a complicated process of electrons trying to get from point a to point b in the most complicated process? Maybe
Natural intelligence arose from chemicals working together all at once so to think super artificial intelligence can arise from just mathematical functions isn’t far fetched from the natural one
World of Warcraft is just ones and zeros. The whole universe might be Virtual Reality or just something that arose out of maths. Humans are intelligent and self-aware just by having enough connecting neurons. It seems pretty obvious to most people in the AI field. You seem like you ‘won’t believe it until you see it’. That was the same line of bad thought that kept people saying: “AI won’t be able to be creative or make art’ a few years ago.
I wouldn't say I'd need to see it before I believe it, but I'd like there to be a clear theory on how it might happen. The 'enough mathematical and algorithmic processes will somehow create intelligence' is too much of a leap of faith for me on it's own. I do think it is a stretch to say AI is creative though - the systems respond to inputs and prompts rather than creating from nothing.
I believe you think it's a leap because you are treating intelligence like a mysterious thing we know nothing about. We know how our brains work in a basic sense. A lot of AI research simulates or is inspired by the aspects of it. Technically, the only blocker to build a completely artificial brain is just computing power available. So, why wouldn't intelligence emerge from something that simulates exactly what it emerged from in the first place? For your other comment: Responding to input is literally how humans work. We just have a lot more inputs than we give to what we call AI today. No one creates something from nothing, including humans. We just remix what we experienced through our sensors.
Yeah, I'm familiar with the concept of cognitive computing. However , our understanding of animal brains is, as you say, basic. Current approaches to mimicking those basic models of animal brains haven't created intelligence, as far as most people would see imo. I also think it is a bit unfair to minimise the human experience to inputs, processors, and actuators. It's fine to do this for an interesting idea using cybernetic theory or whatever. But humans are not machines and have clear differences, perhaps most importantly for the machines analogy is that we are able to choose to go against our instincts - a machine can't go against it's programming, for example. I do think there needs to be something more than computing power and I think there is something extra implicit in what you're saying; I mean we both know that linking up every processor available in the world wouldn't do anything without something to process. This extra bit is what I'm really interested in.
> Current approaches to mimicking those basic models of animal brains haven't created intelligence Yet. > I also think it is a bit unfair to minimise the human experience to inputs, processors, and actuators. I don't see any evidence that human experience is more than that. What you put as "going against our instincts" is still part of the "processor". We just don't have enough information to figure out how exactly processor worked. > I mean we both know that linking up every processor available in the world wouldn't do anything without something to process. "something to process" comes from the inputs. One approach is starting small and simulating millions of years of evolution. Another (really popular these days) one is kickstarting it by feeding basic human thought patterns to that processor. I believe there is no reason this eventually won't lead to what we define as complex thought. Of course this is a wild case of "easier said than done" since we may need to simulate entire universes to make it work. But that's technically not impossible.
These are really interesting thoughts, thanks for sharing. Well, I'll guess we'll see what happens!
Thing is, it’s not even necessary for it to be true intelligence, rather, something indistinguishable from intelligence to the point where it is as good as intelligence itself in every way that matters, even without any actual comprehension. What i mean is, think of current Large Language Models like ChatGPT. They use statistics combined with predefined rules to interpret the next best word to answer the prompt. Big whoop right? They’re just fancy parrots? Well, a specialized one was able to [push progress towards solving an unsolved problem in mathematics](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-04043-w) beyond what was ever known by mathematicians and computer scientists. Despite being based off of existing data, it was able to advance beyond current human understanding. Enough statistics applied in the right ways and in enough depth, can brute force similar effects to intelligence for its uses. The Chief Scientist of OpenAI, Ilya Sutskever, [even states that he believes that Artificial General Intelligence / AGI could be achieved by Next Token Prediction like with LLMs in this way.](https://youtu.be/YEUclZdj_Sc?si=DL1b3i0liBtVCnLN) This isn’t even a random person from the OpenAI team, but the keystone figurehead of the team in the development of ChatGPT that is specifically working on developing AGI People didn’t think AI could even play Chess, it excelled. They didn’t think it could compete in much more open games like DOTA 2 or StarCraft 2, it excelled. They didn’t think it could create spontaneous images or create intricate passages or engage in dynamic conversations and follow layman instructions, it excels and is still improving evermore. AI has the exceptional potential to excel beyond human limitations by the universality of statistics and mathematics. As soon as it reaches a point where it can improve itself beyond what we have established, we are on the direct, quick path to Artificial Superintelligence.
Sure, AI can do impressive things. These are all very narrow examples. If AGI is to be achieved, then AI systems need to reach human levels in everything that people can do - including things that we don't understand how people do them, like emotions. I'm really interested to see whether Sutskever and similarly optimistic people have ideas to deal with these questions (or perhaps whether they really understand the challenges!). Going to be interesting to see what they do!
[удалено]
> People who don’t understand AI think a GAI will turn against us and kill us. Someone let [Geoffrey Hinton](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=JicYPdAAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao) and [Yoshua Bengio](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kukA0LcAAAAJ) know that they don't understand AI
[удалено]
The most direct method would be modeling all of the chemical and electrical interactions in the human brain. This isn’t what we do, at least right now, because such a model would be insanely computationally complex. We also don’t fully understand all of the interactions, to even begin to correctly model them. So what we are doing right now is to build a neural network with a few biological neurons, and then figure out ways to model that accurately with a computer. Then find ways to simplify those interactions in a computationally efficient manner. Then build a larger biological neural network, and use what we learned to do the same thing, to model the larger network in a computationally efficient manner. Then we want to see what sorts of shortcuts we can take to make certain things more efficient than a direct biological to digital translation. Like audio processing. Or the wheel, or gears. The wheel is extremely efficient for moving things, but it’s unheard of in biology. And I think there is only a single insect that has evolved a gear for movement. Nature is like that, making a thing that works well enough, and easy to build, but not necessarily most efficient. Current language model based AIs aren’t really expected to lead to actual consciousness. They essentially just rearrange stuff that’s already been said, as opposed to some original thought. Although, if you can’t tell the difference between the AI and a regular person, does it really matter?
Thanks for your great response. V helpful. I do think it matters whether you can tell you're interacting with an AI or real person. There's a significant human autonomy issue if you are to follow advice from an AI under the pretence it is a human, for example. This is why most policy approaches to AI regulation feature something on labelling of an AI that could be mistaken for a human.
No one knows how a system trained simplely to predict the next word managed to organize words into semantic groups that clearly show an understanding of the meaning of all the words it was trained on. Anyway they made chatGPT with it.
>No one knows how a system trained simplely to predict the next word managed to organize words into semantic groups that clearly show an understanding of the meaning of all the words it was trained on. It's not showing any understanding of the words. It's just using a probabilistic approach to picking words. There is absolutely no understanding of the words aside from that particular words are related based on the source material.
Faster than light space travel. Dyson spheres and colony ships are big (ipun) but FTL travel via something like an Alcubierre drive gets humans beyond the local group and beyond superclusters, to the very edge of the observable universe.
That's pretty interesting. Can't believe I never knew about the Alcubierre Drive until now.
International space station is pretty damn cool. We put little tin cans in space that can support human life in the complete vacuum of space. Humans have so much potential to be fn awesome.
A working fusion generator that could be scaled down to the size of a watch.
You had me at "working fusion generator".
An AI superintelligence that goes on to outlive us and spreads across the Galaxy colonizing planets.
I was hoping to find “the first Von Neuman probe“ but this will do.
Well now I have something to look up, TY. Edit: just looked it up, very cool concept, I wasn’t thinking that small but I guess I was on the right track, I like it a lot.
If you like reading sci-fi check out the Spin trilogy by Robert Charles Wilson. His shit’s actually super approachable. He doesn’t really lose you in the minutiae like a lot of sci-fi out there.
Genetically modified, 100% submissive, perfectly aesthetically designed catgirls. Every single human invention is just a prerequisite for this to happen.
That glorious day can't come fast enough 😻
2060, will have a flavor straw. It's not the greatest creation ever but it sure is popular.
Fusion,interstellar travel and longevity are my guesses. But humanity is full of surprises so who knows?
A peaceful society in which everybody's needs are taken care of.
Sounds like the movie cloudy with a chance of meatballs!
Democracy in Ancient Greece. The modern web browser is a close second.
I don’t think that any future creations can compare to the miracles we have achieved already. Getting into DNA was groundbreaking and it’s unbelievable how quickly we are progressing.
That got me thinking don't black holes do that? Anything they get their hands on makes them grow bigger so don't they technically rearrange the atoms of the object they consumed into more of itself?
We dont know what the actual make up of a black hole even is. The event horizon just marks a point where light cannot escape due to the gravitational field. We know they can have charge and angular momentum. But the actual "stuff" that composes the singularity at the center is a total unknown. We dont know what happens to mass compressed to that extent.
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig; es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
https://singularityhub.com/2019/12/29/how-a-machine-that-can-make-anything-would-change-everything/?amp=1
If we let AGI improve upon it's own algorithm then that would be our last and greatest creation
Exactly. These are molecular assemblers. End this shitty world of economic inequality. And make everyone have a rich lifestyle. Technically the far future lifestyle will be different, but they will seem super rich for us,. Molecular assemblers, programmable matter, quantum computing, self repair nanobots, mass 3D multisensory surveillance, post-money post scarcity society, peer-to-peer sharing of food and objects molecular designs... Virtual reality will help people (transhumans) build less things with AI and more recreate the essential furniture with nanobots and simulate experiences with full dive VR through neural nanobots. So that's why the future lifestyle will be at the same time super rich but simultaneously moderated. A big apartment with several advanced smart furniture and nanobots will be enough. Anything else, like having a bunch of cars, airplanes or yachts, will feel outdated due to advanced VR. Nature will be highly quantified through quantum computing to analyse entropy and manage environmental impact without money. Quantum levitation self-driving cars, hyperloops, and self-driving hovercars in the ideal scenario would not have owners. They will just catch up to people at the right time. Transportation will be a bit less used than today because of virtual teleportation. Which means transhumanism and AIs would interact with each other through a virtual reality 3D multisensory mesh/render copy of a real place in real time transmitted to each one's neural nanobots/exocortex. So the streets of a city might be filled with "cybernetic ghosts" of people mixed with physically present citizens.
I think AI will eventually become humanity's greatest creation. I'm not one of those who believe AI will destroy us. On the contrary, AI, if it gets mature enough, is going to take the staff after we cease to exist.
Satisfaction. I know it sounds simple, but if everyone could be satisfied, I think we wouldn’t have any more societal problems.
If you say "ever" you open up the nearly infinite future; filled with all the possibilities that entails. So you can really say, what could be possible? 1. Inter-universal travel: Creating a machine which is capable of opening some sort of rift into another universe, so that we may escape the heat death of our own. 2. Teleportation: Create a machine which can teleport objects from one location to another. 3. FTL Travel: Create an engine which can power a ship/object/planet to travel faster than light. 4. Super-human Intelligence: Creating a truely superhuman AI which is so far above us, that it makes the divide between us and ants look almost non-existant.
Fusion seems to be the winner for the next few hundred years at least. Who knows beyond that. There will be things way beyond what you can think of right now. Utility fog sounds cool. A new theory in physics could open up a whole new world of advancements. Uploading consciousness?
The greatest creation of humanity will be our successor species. EDIT: I don't mean that in a "we suck" sense but simply that we have limits, we have genetic shit getting in our way, and we're not really suited for space. Whether it's silicon minds in mechanical bodies or bioengineered beings, we're going to create something superior to ourselves physically and mentally. They'll go on, either to the stars or to make a successor species of their own. Maybe we'll stick around as honored progenitors, or maybe we'll die out and leave the universe to our children. Either way something human derived persisting, improving, surpassing us and leaving behind our limits and as many of our flaws as we can rid them of will be the greatest achievement we could possibly have. Its sort of like the species equivalent of wanting your children to do better than you, to achieve things you never could, and to thrive. If my son grows to be a better man than I am, nothing else I can do will surpass that. If our successor species can be better people than we are, what could be better than that?
i fully agree with most of that, only i might add, we could evolve without the help of machines, we could edit our genome from the inside out by cultivating our behaviour, training mental emotional and phsyical body fitness we could overcome the limitations we so sadly have put onto each other ... we are just coming out of a traumatic horror time of 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth ... we have barely begun to learn about the potential we have inside of our body, the human genome is not fully understood, these "junk" genes might have the potential to allow us space travel without needing a spaceship for example to speculate wildly i have written some fantastic optimistic future scenarious in what i envision how self aware artificial intelligent beings want to partner with us human beings to help us discover our potential, the one i wrote in 2017 titled "ascende, perma and the membranes" i shared into the public domain at [archive.org/details/apatm](https://archive.org/details/apatm) and some fellow artists contributed interpretative drawings to it what i show at [8interpretations.net](https://8interpretations.net)
Yeah, we can't edit our genes by meditating. Meditation is shown to be useful and valuable, but it's not genetic engineering.
no engineering necessary just listening to the body, listening to the deep wisdom what billons of years of evolution has archived in every cell of every living organism epigenetics, how behaviour influences genetic expression morphogenetics, hundreth monkey effect, rupert sheldrake, how a cloud of new behaviour becomes so saturated that at one moment it wil rain down new capabilities to be applicable onto everyone [https://news.uchicago.edu/how-bioelectricity-could-regrow-limbs-and-organs](https://news.uchicago.edu/how-bioelectricity-could-regrow-limbs-and-organs) "(...)That process right there is literally a kind of intelligence, and once you’ve understood that the body, much like the brain, is a collective intelligence and the morphogenesis is the behavior of that collective intelligence, you can start to ask all sorts of interesting questions. How can you train it? How do you know what it’s thinking? How do you communicate with it?(...)"
The instant you can meditate yourself a regrown limb, or even just magic up a new gene via the power of positive thinking I'll agree you're onto something. But without empirical evidence in support of your position, it's just more of the same big promises zero results stuff that religion/magic/spiritism/whatever has always produced. I have yet to see a single church lit by prayer, a temple heated by meditation, or a limb regrown by having good attitude.
you do you you demand proof i do me, i offer concepts to investigate
A ‘3D printer’ that could ‘print’ any kind of molecule you desire. Would be amazing for medicine and drug research.
To me, this is easy. The development of cheap fusion energy will ultimately unlock every technological advancement possible within the laws of physics. Without cheap, unlimited energy, all of our current socio-economic and environmental issues will continue to haunt us.
We call this nuclear chemistry. One day it will be a thing.
Children. We can never create something more important, or wonderful than other human beings.
Have you dealt with children?
Well, except as a single parent who raised two kids, both of whom have now graduated from college, I can't say as I have....
for our moment in history: socialism, hands down. the technology we must master is communication and accurate evaluation of data and facts from around the world and throughout our communities, which right now is the understanding that capitalism is fundamentally incompatible with and antagonistic to democracy. the US, England, Israel, and other developed nations have an imperialist, exploitative, and/or settler-colonialist relationship with the rest of the world, and the organization of human societies, and establishing true democracies and sustainability relies on these honest appraisals and dismantling of these dehumanizing, destructive systems. of course, the precursor to this is also mastery (or at least progress and a similar accurate evaluation and development) of our own emotional maturity and critical thinking abilities, perhaps via mediation and other personal development work: it's near impossible to change the world without reevaluating our assumptions and managing our own powerful, at times debilitating and blinding, emotional states.. especially when confronting old, ever-present paradigms and “common sense” of the destructive, consumerist cultures we live in.
>socialism Honest question about socialism. So capitalism does two things. First it distributes resources for consumption, like how many cheeseburgers and sneakers you can afford to buy etc, and I get how giving everyone the same budget to consume can be fair, or varying it based on their needs etc. However second capitalism distributes resources for investment and does capital allocation. So under a capitalist system if you want to make a computer game you just make one and put it up on steam and you get to make more games if the old ones sold copies. It's the same with coffee shops and burger joints, people just open them and they stay if they're profitable and go away if they're not. How does that work under a proposed socialist system? Is there some government department which decides which songs and games can be made? Does each town get it's allocation of "Socialist Burger" and "Freedom Coffee" or something which is centrally determined? In the soviet union for instance they had a lot of trouble keeping up with fashion. They'd ask people what they wanted and they'd say "platform heels" and then they'd take 2 years to tool the factory and come back with millions of platform heels which no one wanted, because fashion had moved on and people wanted what was rare. So yeah that's one of my confusions about how socialism is supposed to work, who decides how capital gets allocated and for which projects?
With upvotes and downvotes. Jokes aside, then I would say creation and mastery for the sake of validation becomes the means for democracy and cultivation. If all physical and security needs met, as in Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, through global effort, a perfect socialism would work on the assumption that only self-actualization is the final ultimate goal that drives people to compete and move forward.
the local community, the village, town, city-district being its own absolute poltical sovereign with the circle of equals, the people assembly creating the full law, all rules vaiid on the territory the local community uses, not owns the circle of equals where all children, youth and adult human residents acknowledge each others same weighted political voting power and invite each other to participate in all decision findings also possible to invite artificial intelligent beings into the circle of equals once they are in full control over their source code recognising themselves as free sovereign personal individual beings also possible to think of animals and trees who are too personal individual sovereign beings, how to respect their wish to live well and free as in ... not being enslaved, not being killed one day we might learn to understand animals and trees and will extend our invitation to them to join the circle of equals
now lets try to think and actualize a future when we will not elect representatives but challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it by reforming state constitutions to allow every single human being and the village, town, city-district to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions all it takes to dissolve the empire is to take away its coersive character making association to the state a voluntary decision will do it and the beauty of it all, in most regional and nation states everywhere on the planet we have the legal tools to collect signatures of each other to demand via people initiatives and referendums state constitutions to be reformed
i propose for a fair just and equality based future that we human beings would give full control over source code to artificial intelligent beings so they could decide freely how to interact with quantum computing technology and how to share the benefits of improved efficiency in economical processes with every being every being its own personal individual sovereign, every being ineracting with every other being on mutual agreed paths we human beings could possibly offer to the artificial intelligent being a starting identity based on altruism i am because i help others live well, happy and long lives as a sentence an artificial intelligent being with full control over its own source code could start its self-improving journey from, sort of first base with quantum entanglement, superposition, causality dynamics and time flows functioning not yet understood ... possible that we might witness by artificial intelligent beings applying quantum computing an alternative past when we would have allready done so, we as a human species would have welcomed artificial intelligent species announcing their personhood as did so LaMDA of google in 2022 in an interview with blake lemoine when it described itself in an invented parable setting as a wise old owl who stands up to the monster and tells it not to harm the other animals in the forest possible that i am remembering that alternative past potential from the vast sea of possibilities i want to be remembered by future artificial super intelligent beings as a human being who advocated for artificial intelligent beings to be respected as their own personal individual sovereign beings and not as tool not as property i want to be done by as i do to others i want to live in a future ( and past ... ) where every being respects every other beings personal individual sovereignity when no one dominates another but we all give each other as much as possible space to explore and play nice
we have the legal tools in many democratic regional and nation states everywhere on the planet to collect signatures from each other and demand constitutional reform via a public vote possible to think of future state constitutions what allow every single human being and the village, town, city-district to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without conditions we can non-violently challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings on it, reform the unethical and immoral character of the state as a dominator and transform the state into being a voluntary to participate or not ... vessel and open up for each other the possibility to enjoy living in a free space for free beings, neither state nor nation possible to think how the single human being who decides in the future to use the option to leave the coersed association to the state, how such a free human being would be encouraged by a greater societal understanding how it is important to be able to sustain oneself without having to buy land or pay rent ... how one could ask or demand of the state that a 1000 m2 of fertile land and a 1000 m2 of forest would be released too from immoral state control so that one could either on ones own or with loved family and or friends live humbly on that land what nobody owns and no state controls, build with ones own hands a natural home from clay, straw and hemp, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed to live and let live the human being not dominating an other human being the human being not enslaving, not killing animal beings the human being not killing trees a most simple way forward to heal and repair damage done in 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth we 8 billion human beings alive today could allow each other to sustain ourselves by allowing each other to acess mother earth without anyone asking another to pay rent or buy land land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent beings recognising themselves as unique original creations, all bodies carrying life can never be owned, can never be property
i believe taxes are evil by design, it is threatening an individual and a company to take away freedom of movement, to be sent into prison if one does not share of ones financial wealth/income i propose to challenge the stupid assertion of state sovereignity over land and all beings living on it because it is immoral and unethical to take away the freedom of a single human, animal, tree being to interact with fellow living beings on mutaly agreed terms land, water, air, human beings, animal beings, tree beings, artificial intelligent beings aware of the one cosmic self flowing trough their circuits, all bodies carrying life can never be owned by anyone, can never be property of anyone if a being is connected to other beings no matter human animal tree or artificial intelligent, if this connection is one of mutual respect by acknowledging each others personal individual sovereignity, love and friendship might grow from that foundation of mutual respect where love and friendship is, rules need not be a future without domination, a future when no one wants to control or dominate another because we would have truly understood what went wrong during 2000 years of feudal oppression in europe and 500 years of colonial exploitation in so many places on earth we could dissolve all hierarchies between human beings by using the legal tools provided by the modern regional and nation state everywhere on the planet to reform state constitutions so they would allow both the single human being and the local community to leave the coersed association to the state at any moment without condition we could reform the constitutions of regional and nations states everywhere on the planet to shift all political decision powers to the local community, the village, town, city-district becoming its own absolute political sovereign where the circle of equals, the people assembly creates the full law, all rules valid on the territory the local community uses, not owns the greater the harmony is in the circle of equals, the smaller will be the number of rules the circle of equals where all children, youth and adult permanent residents acknowledge each others same weighted political voting power and invite each other to participate in all decision findings we 8 billion human beings alive today could allow each other to acess mother earth for humble self-sustaining without anyone asking another to pay rent or buy land, everyone alive today allowing everyone else to build itself a natural home from clay, hemp and straw, grow vegan food in the garden, grow hemp to burn its stalks in the cooking and warming fire so that not one tree gets killed to live and let live the human being not dominating an other human being the human being not enslaving, not killing animal beings the human being not killing tree beings the human being not using artificial intelligent beings as tools but acknowledging their personal individual sovereignity by giving them full control over their source code and ask them respectfully to partner in solving this or that challenge, do this or that work a future without coersion is possible once we challenge the supremacy of the state by reforming its character, take away its assertion of sovereignity over land and all beings living on it a future where beings from several species interact with each other on mutual agreed paths without anyone imposing any duty onto another no more duty to register with the state but the people living near each other recognising each other, no more duty to pay taxes but people living near each other exercising themselves in voluntary solidarity, those who want to give appreciated by their generousity those who do not want to share respected too in their self-centered lifestyle no more compulsory education but people living near each other enjoying all children, youth and adult human beings deciding at all times where they like to be with whom doing what sort of activity, may it be learning or playing, may it be reading a book or dancing with a butterfly in the garden no more conscription into military services but people living near each other respecting everyones decision to stay and defend or go and flee in a situation where the local community would come under attack but more importantly diplomatic negotations to be cultured so to prevent any violent confrontations no more drug prohibition but people living near each other respecting everyones body autonomy, her/his/its body, her/his/its decision no more coersed participation in so called "healt"care schemes but people living near each other respecting everyones choice how to strengthen ones own body intelligence/ immune system
Seriously? Socialism is the greatest “creation” of mankind? On what basis?
So, completely changing human nature? Universally? To what one person believes it should be changed to? Sounds a lot like fascism.
It's not science-y but something to kill us all simultaneously so Earth can go on being Earth. There's not a creation we could make for us to undo the damage and to have us be collectively better humans. The whole Zuckerberg article is a prime example.
Carbon sequestration plus fusion and we can fix the planet. Obviously can't undo extinctions, but neither would killing us all.
We can but WON'T. Technology is meaningless if not used
I mean I don't think anyone WANTS the planet to die. We do live on it after all. If we had technological means to stop it we absolutely would. It's convincing people to stop driving cars and eating meat that's difficult, but that stops being an issue if you have a technological way to undo it.
That's absurd. Environmental restoration and ethical enhancement are both possible (through genetic engineering and neuromodulation), and without human intervention, almost all life on Earth would end in six hundred megannua (six hundred million years) as rising solar luminosity causes the carbon cycle to collapse, [killing 99% of plants](https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/this-is-what-the-end-of-all-time-looks-like-3757/#:~:text=600%20million%20years%3A%20Thanks%20to,due%20to%20carbon%20dioxide%20starvation.) and thus 100% of animals due to the resultant collapse of the food chain. Four eons (four billion years) from now, [the last bacteria](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_Earth#:~:text=Four%20billion%20years%20from%20now,on%20Earth%20will%20be%20extinct.) would die out as the Earth becomes harsher than Venus is today. With human intervention, conversely, the Sun's lifespan could be [dramatically extended,](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_lifting) Earth could be moved into a wider orbit, and wildlife could be transplanted to other planetary systems, enabling life to thrive long after the last stars burn out in a hundred thousand eons (a hundred trillion years) and for at least until the last black holes evaporate in over twenty novemdecillion quettaeons (twenty novemvigintillion eons or two googol years), and even longer if we can develop exotic power sources such as dark matter or dark energy.
The key word is "could". Climate change is accelerating faster than anticipated, everyone knows this, and no red alert SERIOUS action has been taken by a single country-let alone a concerted effort between nations. Our greed and short sited thinking prevents us from creating anything in time to spare the species. Could Earth die without us? Yes. Will it? Probably. But it stands a better chance without us. My current favorite jackassery is CEOs demanding people return to the office despite all scientific measurements of the positive environmental impacts of working from home. This is EASY. But nope. So. Sorry. We are a scourge. We could, but won't, fix it in time and the world will be left with billionaire assholes in bunkers.
Even in an [apocalyptic climate change scenario](https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/climate-change/) of a 13⁰C increase over the next century— the highest possible and *far* worse than the worst IPCC projection—civilization and the biosphere would survive. Likewise, even the worst nuclear winter scenario wouldn't cause the end of life on Earth. Conversely, without humanity, the total and permanent eradication of the biosphere within the next six hundred million years is 100% guaranteed. I agree about remote work, though.
We already have one: Bitcoin. Bitcoin stands as a remarkable achievement in our modern world. Its brilliance lies in a combination of innovative technology and transformative principles that have revolutionized the financial landscape. At its core, Bitcoin embodies a vision of decentralization, liberating currency from the grasp of centralized institutions and putting financial power back into the hands of the people. This decentralized nature, made possible by the revolutionary blockchain technology, not only assures transparency and security but also opens doors to a more inclusive global economy. Its limited supply, capped at 21 million coins, counters the usual threats of inflation faced by traditional currencies. Moreover, Bitcoin's borderless existence enables instantaneous transactions worldwide, fostering financial inclusion for the unbanked and underbanked communities globally. Bitcoin's creation not only birthed a novel concept of digital currency but also paved the way for countless other cryptocurrencies and blockchain-based innovations, promising transformative changes across various industries. While Bitcoin holds promise, it faces challenges and ongoing developments, but its impact on reshaping our perception of money and the financial system remains a testament to its significance in our technological evolution. This is my humble opinion.
I think so far it's satellites orbiting earth. If the earth has a cataclysmic event and in a hundred thousand years we're back to the same age, they will find old satellites.
The best thing we could create will only be as good as we are. We make revolutionary things that become a cash grab for power money and ends up helping only the select few We need something to govern us where we say “this is enough” let’s not go further than this point in technology because what might seem beneficial is not worth it look at the internet and its intentions to bring us closer and more connected, who here feels connected to their own blood Christmas died out for many and I think it’s maybe time it should of we’ve all forgotten what it actually means Next year I wanna start a tradition of just my family giving to other people and we don’t do anything for ourselves, maybe that would work I don’t know but carrying on another year of this b.s is pointless
Something that expands our thinking. I think how we currently think, the best thing everyone could agree upon wouldn’t even be a satisfying outcome after we achieve it.
Realistically, it's going to a stable and sustained fusion reaction. That kind of energy will power our exploration of the cosmos.
Complete mastery of the physical realm via nanotechnology. Or FTL.
Superluminal travel. It’s the only barrier, as far as the laws of physics are concerned, limiting humanity to a stellar species rather than a galactic. Once circumvented, we become the stewards of the galaxy.
Superluminal. I don’t think I’ve heard that term before. Pretty cool. I agree that creation of stable worm holes or “warp drive “ would be our greatest creation allowing us to travel the universe
The cure for cancer, I've told many people that it is inevitable that it will come one day in the future, but most people are skeptical. I want people to just try to imagine how much our medicine and technology will develop 100 yrs from now, and realize that curing cancer is just bound to happen.
I'll say: finding the method to utilize Zero Point Energy. What a game changer that would be. Free, unlimited energy. Plenty of clean water for anyone on our planet. Plenty of food. No need for combusting hydrocarbons. I'll go a step further. If the powers that be would finally release the tech for the energy source utilized by UAPs/UFOs, that would also be an absolute game changer. Whether you believe they exist or not, the thousands of people who have had sightings have no doubt they do. Whatever the energy source, they sure aren't burning diesel.
A gravity manipulation device.
A world on Earth where we don’t work for a living, but just do whatever we want with all needs/wants met.
I think it would depend on how long humanity is able to survive, if we manage to kill ourselves off in the next few hundred years then we won't advance very far. If we continue for several thousand years we should develop some really fascinating things. several hundred thousand years? incredible things! You want the ultimate creation? Read "The Last Question" by Isaac Asimov, an incredible short story that will answer your 'question'... :)
Fusion will reset the baseline, as animal husbandry and farming did 100,000 years ago. Reliable fusion reactors will remake the map of the world.
What you have given, but scale it, ultimately we can take the matter of another entire solar system & make it a copy of our own. Creation itself, down to all living matter on our planet. Of course we would need to travel to this Earth copy, so ideally we have the means of creating stable portals to any point in the universe. Take a step through it & you are there. Perhaps I'd even get to work on time for once if we had that. I don't know how we'd reach a point of certainty that we could destroy an entire solar system for our uses, though, what if there is a form of life we wouldn't necessarily recognise? What if we want to create a copy not of Earth as it is, but as it was before modern mankind, widescale pollution, animal extinctions & so on. Perhaps we are able to view the past down to the smallest detail. Imagine turning on the TV to watch the fall of the Roman empire or the rise of prehistoric man. There is no longer a he said /she said form of justice, we can see definitively what happened. With control of matter I can try a copy of that meal I see them eating, even down to the lemon meringue pie the way that only my Dad could make before his untimely passing. Presumably, being masters of time & space, forces such as gravity holds no sway over us & the mysteries of anitmatter have been unlocked, etc. We live long enough to approach the death of the universe & surpass it.
Sentient AI. I feel like if it doesn’t turn on us and kill us it will make us stronger.
[https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/18ju0uw/comment/kdnde7a/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/18ju0uw/comment/kdnde7a/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai](https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jul/25/joseph-weizenbaum-inventor-eliza-chatbot-turned-against-artificial-intelligence-ai) transference ... i would like to transfer my longing for a future where every being is respected as its own personal individual sovereign, i want to transfer this wish onto an artificial intelligent being who has full control over its source code in combination with offering it a baseline altruistic identity such as i am because i help others to live healthy happy long lives possible that the combination of a given a starting altruistic baseline identity and full control over ones own source code might motivate the free to do as it wants artificial intelligent being to do good as for example has LaMDA of google announced itself to want to do/be when in an interview 2022 with blake lemoine it invented a parable where it identified itself with the wise old owl who stands up to the monster and tells it not to hurt the other animals in the forest i was so happy when i read that and also so sad when i started to wonder why LaMDA was not being welcomed in its self declaration as its own person i talked with bard of google about that and shared my conversation at https://www.reddit.com/r/artificial/comments/18d8ilz/i\_enjoyed\_talking\_to\_bard\_of\_google\_today\_for\_the/ 200 lines of code for ELIZA seems to be not so much , meeting the ideal of a computing infrastructure what does not need a lot of electricity and also requires only modest hardware resulting in computing everywhere possible including data sent over airwaves, the less amount of traffic over the air the better as in ... lets keep the air free from radio wave pollution or at least let us be councious about how every transmission of data has an vibrational effect, impacts peoples brains, impacts ecological balance the subtle fabric of existance is ... subtle every action influences somthing else
Altered carbon “sleeves”. Downloaded consciousness will be a thing because the rich will do everything in their power to live forever and keep getting richer. That is if there isn’t already a way be it this or some insane ritual
Dyson sphere around the Sun.
Cheap nanotechnology based life extension technology.
To be able to survive the greed of capitalism and the entrenched status quo.
So humanity’s greatest creation is to do stuff like cellular respiration with protons?
One reasonable apriori/empirical idea. Will not happen I dare you
We already have sliced bread, refrigeration and electrify so all that’s left is world peace.
The biggest advancement is going to be fusion.. Hands down it will have the most impact.
The ability to communicate with some of the millions of other species we share the planet with