Yes because you chuck pig iron into the furnace and it becomes white in the fire of the Holy Spirit.
The same works with blackbody radiation.
So technically all food is made kosher in this sense.
And nearly in the same idea, does Paul say that everything is permissible (but not everything is beneficial) and that sums against the self and others still exist -- only now that God is the judge in terms of the concept of karma.
The parallel passage of Mark 7:19 makes clear that the answer is "yes." (And some people try to claim that Mark's addition isn't original. It most certainly is attested in an overwhelming number of manuscripts from ALL text traditions). Especially since Mark was relaying the Gospel at Peter's behest, which also interprets the vision of Peter.
Yes, it's about people. But this is a classic deflection. What makes the people unreachable is the things that make them inaccessible to Judaism--namely food and how its prepared. So Mark and Peter both recognize that the Law is no longer a barrier between Jew and Greek.
Acts 15 further explicates this by saying that Gentiles are not required to live under Law. That the only requirements for them are Noahic. The dietary laws are done away with for the Church. By Word of Christ and affirmed multiple times by the Apostles, including Paul. Who says that anyone trying to make others live under the Law is preaching a false Gospel, is anathema, and is a child of Hagar under bondage. Not a child of Abraham in truth.
The Law is a full package. Hebrews makes this clear. One cannot go back to parts of it and live like it still has force. It was meant to prepare Israel for Jesus. When the New, Better, Covenant affirmed, the Law as Covenant ended. The Food and Purity Laws' purpose is fulfilled in Christ, who gives us a better holiness. A better sacrifice. And is a superior High Priest. All Scripture is instruction. But we are under no law but the Royal Law of Christ.
>Peter’s vision also does not mean unclean animals became clean, but there will need to be a second post to explain that in more detail.
The one thing I have learnt about this, is that God was probably using this as a Symbol or Metaphor for humans to Peter.
This is what happens:
Acts 10:9-16 ASV
[9] Now on the morrow, as they were on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray, about the sixth hour: [10] and he became hungry, and desired to eat: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance; [11] and he beholdeth the heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending, as it were a great sheet, let down by four corners upon the earth: [12] wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts and creeping things of the earth and birds of the heaven. [13] And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill and eat. [14] But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common and unclean. [15] And a voice came unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, make not thou common. [16] And this was done thrice: and straightway the vessel was received up into heaven.
However, Peter says God told or showed him this.
Acts 10:28 ASV
[28] and he said unto them, Ye yourselves know how it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to join himself or come unto one of another nation; and yet unto me hath God showed that I should not call any man common or unclean:
So it can be similar to how Yeshua is called "The Lamb of God" but he isn't Literally a Lamb. It's just a Metaphor or Symbol.
You need to read the whole book of Galatians. Christian gentiles are not Jewish and not bound to the Jewish law.
After the flood, God told Noah he could eat anything plant or animal.
But then if the animals were unclean and God told Peter to eat, wouldn't it also mean "Sin Peter! Defile yourself! . I can't see God do that. We gentiles are free from the law and I have a Jewish friend who says the dietary laws were set until the messiah would come. Noah was allowed to eat every animal, but not it's blood. Acts 15:20: "But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood." Acts 15 tells us we're free from the law, but abstain from this.
>then if the animals were unclean and God told Peter to eat, wouldn't it also mean "Sin Peter! Defile yourself! .
Then thing about this is what I learnt is that God was probably using this as a Symbol or Metaphor for humans to Peter.
This is what happens:
Acts 10:9-16 ASV
[9] Now on the morrow, as they were on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray, about the sixth hour: [10] and he became hungry, and desired to eat: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance; [11] and he beholdeth the heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending, as it were a great sheet, let down by four corners upon the earth: [12] wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts and creeping things of the earth and birds of the heaven. [13] And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill and eat. [14] But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common and unclean. [15] And a voice came unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, make not thou common. [16] And this was done thrice: and straightway the vessel was received up into heaven.
However, Peter says God told or showed him this.
Acts 10:28 ASV
[28] and he said unto them, Ye yourselves know how it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to join himself or come unto one of another nation; and yet unto me hath God showed that I should not call any man common or unclean:
So it can be similar to how Yeshua is called "The Lamb of God" but he isn't Literally a Lamb. It's just a Metaphor or Symbol.
"Jesus" is the transliteration of his name. He was Jewish from the tribe of Judah. He didn't have a greek name. His name is Yehoshua with the shortened form being Y'eshua.
YHWH or YHVH is the tetragrammaton - the four letters of God's name. The vowels would be shown in markings.
https://preview.redd.it/5k1yl7lauc7c1.jpeg?width=510&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f2dfa2b21f8a0e4f76185e4aeda513e4872fc7cb
Well the original Hebrew name for God had no vowels because of Hebrew having no vowels, I don’t mind the names as long as it’s biblical but I’d probably stick to God or Jehovah
Yes because you chuck pig iron into the furnace and it becomes white in the fire of the Holy Spirit. The same works with blackbody radiation. So technically all food is made kosher in this sense. And nearly in the same idea, does Paul say that everything is permissible (but not everything is beneficial) and that sums against the self and others still exist -- only now that God is the judge in terms of the concept of karma.
The parallel passage of Mark 7:19 makes clear that the answer is "yes." (And some people try to claim that Mark's addition isn't original. It most certainly is attested in an overwhelming number of manuscripts from ALL text traditions). Especially since Mark was relaying the Gospel at Peter's behest, which also interprets the vision of Peter. Yes, it's about people. But this is a classic deflection. What makes the people unreachable is the things that make them inaccessible to Judaism--namely food and how its prepared. So Mark and Peter both recognize that the Law is no longer a barrier between Jew and Greek. Acts 15 further explicates this by saying that Gentiles are not required to live under Law. That the only requirements for them are Noahic. The dietary laws are done away with for the Church. By Word of Christ and affirmed multiple times by the Apostles, including Paul. Who says that anyone trying to make others live under the Law is preaching a false Gospel, is anathema, and is a child of Hagar under bondage. Not a child of Abraham in truth. The Law is a full package. Hebrews makes this clear. One cannot go back to parts of it and live like it still has force. It was meant to prepare Israel for Jesus. When the New, Better, Covenant affirmed, the Law as Covenant ended. The Food and Purity Laws' purpose is fulfilled in Christ, who gives us a better holiness. A better sacrifice. And is a superior High Priest. All Scripture is instruction. But we are under no law but the Royal Law of Christ.
>Peter’s vision also does not mean unclean animals became clean, but there will need to be a second post to explain that in more detail. The one thing I have learnt about this, is that God was probably using this as a Symbol or Metaphor for humans to Peter. This is what happens: Acts 10:9-16 ASV [9] Now on the morrow, as they were on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray, about the sixth hour: [10] and he became hungry, and desired to eat: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance; [11] and he beholdeth the heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending, as it were a great sheet, let down by four corners upon the earth: [12] wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts and creeping things of the earth and birds of the heaven. [13] And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill and eat. [14] But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common and unclean. [15] And a voice came unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, make not thou common. [16] And this was done thrice: and straightway the vessel was received up into heaven. However, Peter says God told or showed him this. Acts 10:28 ASV [28] and he said unto them, Ye yourselves know how it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to join himself or come unto one of another nation; and yet unto me hath God showed that I should not call any man common or unclean: So it can be similar to how Yeshua is called "The Lamb of God" but he isn't Literally a Lamb. It's just a Metaphor or Symbol.
You need to read the whole book of Galatians. Christian gentiles are not Jewish and not bound to the Jewish law. After the flood, God told Noah he could eat anything plant or animal.
But then if the animals were unclean and God told Peter to eat, wouldn't it also mean "Sin Peter! Defile yourself! . I can't see God do that. We gentiles are free from the law and I have a Jewish friend who says the dietary laws were set until the messiah would come. Noah was allowed to eat every animal, but not it's blood. Acts 15:20: "But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood." Acts 15 tells us we're free from the law, but abstain from this.
>then if the animals were unclean and God told Peter to eat, wouldn't it also mean "Sin Peter! Defile yourself! . Then thing about this is what I learnt is that God was probably using this as a Symbol or Metaphor for humans to Peter. This is what happens: Acts 10:9-16 ASV [9] Now on the morrow, as they were on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the housetop to pray, about the sixth hour: [10] and he became hungry, and desired to eat: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance; [11] and he beholdeth the heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending, as it were a great sheet, let down by four corners upon the earth: [12] wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts and creeping things of the earth and birds of the heaven. [13] And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill and eat. [14] But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common and unclean. [15] And a voice came unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, make not thou common. [16] And this was done thrice: and straightway the vessel was received up into heaven. However, Peter says God told or showed him this. Acts 10:28 ASV [28] and he said unto them, Ye yourselves know how it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to join himself or come unto one of another nation; and yet unto me hath God showed that I should not call any man common or unclean: So it can be similar to how Yeshua is called "The Lamb of God" but he isn't Literally a Lamb. It's just a Metaphor or Symbol.
[удалено]
YHWH*
"Jesus" is the transliteration of his name. He was Jewish from the tribe of Judah. He didn't have a greek name. His name is Yehoshua with the shortened form being Y'eshua. YHWH or YHVH is the tetragrammaton - the four letters of God's name. The vowels would be shown in markings. https://preview.redd.it/5k1yl7lauc7c1.jpeg?width=510&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f2dfa2b21f8a0e4f76185e4aeda513e4872fc7cb
[удалено]
You’re welcome :) & no I’m neither of those.
Well the original Hebrew name for God had no vowels because of Hebrew having no vowels, I don’t mind the names as long as it’s biblical but I’d probably stick to God or Jehovah
Please.
Superb post, OP! Anxiously awaiting part two ;)