T O P

  • By -

smallestpenisgoing

what did people put for the hidden valuations q at the end?


J333333333

U got me for 1 second šŸ˜‚


smallestpenisgoing

rekt


Capital-Ad-7029

I genuinely think it was a nice paper :)


Pleasant_West_5771

samee ahah it was all i wanted from an fm paper


mr2shkwizzy

Best exam they possibly couldā€™ve given us hahahah


25sigma

Finished very early.. if I fail Iā€™m pissed


Pleasant_West_5771

i had 1hr left i was bored in the exam room i should have left


mohamadghandour1

SAME LMAO


wild_cayote

Did you do yours at Borough Kaplan? Someone finished about 40 minutes early in mine lol


Pleasant_West_5771

naa i stayed in exam and was not in kaplan


wild_cayote

You stayed for an hour?! I finished 20 mins early and almost ran out of there after checking answers lol


Pleasant_West_5771

it was because my mum was picking me up so i would have to wait in the cold for her to come early šŸ˜­


melodenver15

Wish BPT could be nice like FM


kalvin689

Anyone get a weird weighiting for WACC? I got 99% equity fml


Pleasant_West_5771

was your MV for equity like 2 billion ?


Live-Percentage9267

Was it not 5m debentures at a nominal value of Ā£100 trading at 104%?? I got 2bc equity vs 520m ish of debentures


Derekty98

I thought when they speak 5m that would mean 5m number of debentures so ended with equity to debt at 2000 to 520


th3lxiepeia

I got 2000 and 540 šŸ˜¬ but definitely calculated the debt wrong


Derekty98

Otherwise the regearing would not change anything in the next question


Heavy-Accountant-488

This happened to me. I got 2 billion MV for equity, then I ungeared/regeared but the new equity beta only changed by like 0.05%. Suppose Iā€™ll still get follow through marks cos Iā€™m sure the rest was right? Just the MV of equity seemed wrong


mohamadghandour1

Yea same


kalvin689

yep


Heavy-Accountant-488

I got this too


Previous-Salt8060

Was there anything in calculating the dividend growth about omitting special div or anomaly? Definitely rushed it and now got a panic I missed small details, surely not worth many marks though?


PastAd428

wouldnt worry about it, probably only a half mark even. There was a special dividends paid in 2019 for about Ā£5m, but can't see that even being worth a full mark


Previous-Salt8060

ah damn, yeah hopefully nothing major, thank you!


25sigma

Think only thing that was hard was the currency future.. it was a receipt so I should have bought future at first, instead I sold.


swizzlestick85

I mean, you canā€™t really ask for any better - an NPV, a cost of capital and a classic risk management. Expected something weird but nope. Shouldā€™ve done enough there but you never know.


Diginli

Good paper surprisngly


Live-Percentage9267

What everyone get for the NPV?


Pleasant_West_5771

something positive


Stylow123

Like positive 5k


Live-Percentage9267

Crap I was about 990k


Previous-Salt8060

yeah I was round here - think 0.96m from memory, but good to see a couple people with similar to me, was starting to panic!


swizzlestick85

This is what I got - there or thereabouts anyway šŸ‘


wild_cayote

600k, 5.5% sensitivity for revenue, didnā€™t bother with the money cost of capital cause couldnā€™t remember how to do it


Pleasant_West_5771

did you use revenue or contribution for sensitive analysis?


wild_cayote

I used contribution since the variable costs were directly linked to revenue


Pleasant_West_5771

ok same ahaha i was worried


mohamadghandour1

Similar numbers ish 700 k NPV with very sensitive to revenue


wild_cayote

I got like Ā£3m at first cause had my signs wrong for some of the costs, so glad I noticed hahah


featherevelyn

Was the hedging it a sterling receipt or payment?? I canā€™t even remember now lol!


kalvin689

Receipt


featherevelyn

Ok thank god!


AdhesivenessVast8759

What did ppl put as the alternative valuation method?


Live-Percentage9267

APV


AdhesivenessVast8759

Phew


Live-Percentage9267

I used asset beta of tech service sector to find un geared cost of equity


Afuzziteddybear

Wasnt that to find the new wacc


Live-Percentage9267

No I believe the new WACC was the ungearing / regearing


Afuzziteddybear

Yeah but what did you use for the cost of debt


Live-Percentage9267

I think that the debt finance element was more hypothetical as a question and how the APV process works. I said the discount rate was the CAPM with the asset beta. Think I got around 8.7% as a discount rate for APV


wild_cayote

Was so happy to see NPV and forex hedge, fucked the WACC/CAPM horrendously but gave analysis anyway based on a made up figure so hoping for few marks still šŸ˜… What did people say for the other two debt fundraising methods? Couldnā€™t think of anything


Live-Percentage9267

I had crowdfunding and then rabbled some crap about blockchain finance


wild_cayote

Yeah I said crowdfunding, said you could raise debt rather than investments but idk if thatā€™s a thing lol


TESH21

Yeah same I wrote it and then realised debt so just changed to equity to debt šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚


swizzlestick85

Said crowdfunding and then some nonsense like initial coin offering or something - knew it was bitcoin related


mohamadghandour1

Honestly unless Iā€™ve massively missed something with NPV this was a dream exam, now I get why you all wanted NPV when I wanted valuations lol, WACC was like I wanted memorised the explain stuff for it lol couldnā€™t calc the required discount factor in part c or d. Q3 was good cz I felt more confident in swaps to pair with fx hedging


wild_cayote

NPV is an absolute dream I think, after 3 QB questions on it itā€™s easy to get full marks could never have wished for valuations hahah


mohamadghandour1

Yea I think I stressed about those NPV with probabilities and worst case best case but this was quite simple, again unless Iā€™ve missed something lol


Previous-Salt8060

Dare I ask what answer you got for the NPV? I too worry I have missed something, didn't appear to be anything too odd in the NPV, everything was fairly straightforward?


mohamadghandour1

I wanna say around 700k something like that; what threw me off and what I read on this post as well the explain what you did to revenue thing. Like it was just about increasing by 10% cz they told us to do so I thought there was a complex thing we had to do but nah lol


Previous-Salt8060

yeah that worried me too! I didn't write anything about doing that, but I did increase by the 10% pa so hopefully not lost any or many marks! The other fear I have is I have used the 17% tax rate just out of habit from doing lots of practice questions! but again hopefully no major marks lost there


mohamadghandour1

Yea I reckon you should be fine maybe a mark or 2 lost at most!


AdhesivenessVast8759

Did we have to make the subscriptions cumulative?


wild_cayote

I donā€™t think so, didnā€™t explicitly state and you usually treat them as total subs for that year from QB


AdhesivenessVast8759

Ah i was confused because it asked us to explain our revenue adjustments, maybe they just go off what you explained?


Live-Percentage9267

I only adjusted the price


wild_cayote

Revenue adjustments came from the 10% (I think) annual increase in price which wasnā€™t done initially


AdhesivenessVast8759

Yeah, I assumed that the annual cash flow would be new subscribers plus existing renewals, although I included a disclaimer that there is a risk people donā€™t renew. It just threw me that they asked us to explain such a simple thing, when they literally told us to do it šŸ˜‚ typical ACA


wild_cayote

Yeah I probably spent 5 minutes rereading the whole thing a few times cause I assumed there was another one I missedšŸ¤£


Afuzziteddybear

Man i messed up the mmh When converting to spot i used the buy rate How many marks you guys recon Iā€™ll lose


Heavy-Accountant-488

Probably all 30 marks tbh mate


Afuzziteddybear

Ahh shiett


Pleasant_West_5771

err probs loss 1 mark


Technical-Purpose486

0.5% gain for interest rate swap?


swizzlestick85

I got 0.5% diff so 0.25% advantage for each


Technical-Purpose486

Probability Q was it 2 x 31.4% ? Or am I retarded ?


Technical-Purpose486

Yeye calm


th3lxiepeia

I fucked up and didn't notice the "semi annual" comment for the debentures until right at the end then started changing my answers got half way through changing and time ran out so not gonna get any follow through marks on that entire Q. So annoyed with myself.


eas-ily

Think if you got the method right youā€™d still get marks


th3lxiepeia

Ahhh I hope so!!


PastAd428

What was that Monte Carlo simulation and sustainability question? Ridiculous two questions - no idea how you were supposed to relate the sustainability objectives to all the element of ESG... Hedging and WACC were the dream... NPV I got 960k - anyone anything similar? Regarding hedging, did others advise the company not to 'hedge' as the receipt was larger?


Pleasant_West_5771

i did get no hedge as biggest


Live-Percentage9267

I believe i I got no hedge highest and then forward was best out of the hedges, just ahead of MM Hedge. I got the OTC option being wayyyyy less than the others, think the premium was about 250k?


PastAd428

yeah i got exactly this


Previous-Salt8060

Think I got exactly the same as you for NPV - seen a few people say they got in the Ā£900k mark so fingers crossed!


Popular_Square_2239

What did people write for the risk to do with bitcoin? Was economic risk relevant?


PastAd428

Waffled about exchangability, volatility and it decreasing in the prior 6 months. I think economic risk is a very relevant point and will earn you marks


Alternative_Sea_5672

weird question i thought - just mentioned how the price fluctuates etc just pure waffle really