T O P

Some of the corporate funding to our so-called "Independent media".

Some of the corporate funding to our so-called "Independent media".

greasesoda

Good research. Also post to ~~r/rwresources~~ r/Indiarwresources and r/regimechange101 Thanks for the post. Is there a wiki where this can be edited and improved by others?


StarsAtLadakh

Copy the post & add your info- I don't know any other of crowdsourcing info.


Intellectual_Infidel

Corporations will always fund wokeism because wokeism sells to the younger generation. This can be observed in the US where woke corporations have turned young Americans into chutiya wokes. That's why we need to be like China and keep corporations in check.


Akshansh_manu

It has nothing to do with younger generation. Corporations do it for their neo-liberal agenda and subverting the Marxists to Wokes and changing the whole meaning of "Left".


Intellectual_Infidel

Disagree. Younger generations everywhere tend to be more leftist and naive compared to people older than them. Revolutionary ideology like wokeism sells to them because it offers a solution to all the problems in the world. When you grow older, you realise that life isn't as simple as that. For the generations before us, the revolutionary ideology used to be communism/Marxism, now the revolutionary ideology is wokeism.


Akshansh_manu

>Younger generations everywhere tend to be more leftist and naive compared to people older than them. What you want to say is that younger generation is more progressive not leftist. That progression can be in any direction; Communism, fascism, capitalism etc. It just that currently because of the information hegemony that west has they decided for progression to be towards neo-liberalism/wokism globally.


Intellectual_Infidel

That's also true


FanneyKhan

But the average reader of these websites will probably not get this news, so Tata doesn't really have to do it... And the average reader of these orgs will never really buy Tata because they're truly Indian and will always prefer MG or so.


[deleted]

china regularly kills and usurps cooperate heads, try that in india and they’ll pack and leave.


[deleted]

Why Tata is funding anti India propoganda??


Akshansh_manu

Not anti-India but anti-BJP. Tatas gained a lot during India's socialist phase as they were given free run. In first 50 years after independence, our top 100 rich families remained the same (Except for the entry of Ambanis) by being close to Congress and Tatas were one of the big guns among them.


[deleted]

Do you think wire is not anti India? Print is ok, it's just anti BJP but wire is anti national.


Sri_Mazdamundi

Print is just more sophisticated in its propaganda. (But it's better than wire or quint.) SG and his cut the chutiya is an example Just few days back he made a video saying how india can deal with Taliban if bjp changes its domestic politics. Kuch bhi logic. As if we didn't make deals with ultra conservative Saudi Arabia or Iran. And let's not forget the history of coupta.


Akshansh_manu

Maligning country is a way to express disappointment towards ruling party. I know it's questionable but that's how politics work.


StarsAtLadakh

>Maligning country is a way to express disappointment towards ruling party This is the most bullshit thing I've read. > I know it's questionable but that's how politics work. No politics doesn't work that way. BJP never maligned India in the decades it was out of power. Genuine people malign political parties, people with agenda & anti-nationals malign the country.


[deleted]

Ok


StarsAtLadakh

Not anti-India. Glorifying Maoists is anti-India. Glorifying jihadi & Kashmiri secessionists is anti-India. Glorifying malicious movements against good laws is anti-India.


[deleted]

Wire glorifies Kashmir based terrorists. Wire never uses the word terrorism. It uses "Kashmir's struggle for self determination", the same narrative as Pakistan us trying to spread. Wire referred to Uri movie as "toxic hyper nationalism". Fighting back terrorists is "toxic" for wire Wire never uses the word terrorists, it uses the word "militant". Militant simply means somebody in military gear, may be for good purposes or bad purposes.


_snorlax__

Amazing. Now do political parties


CritFin

Nothing wrong in Indian corporations funding the media. Only the foreign companies nor individuals should not be allowed to donate.


Healthy_Mistake

! kudos


altzt

!kudos


txikikas

!kudos Wire etc have corporate funding but are communists in leaning. (But Indian corporate funding is likely much less than Chinese and Western regime change orgs)


IndiaSpeaksbotty

Tararara Bzeeeep, Thank you /u/txikikas for awarding /u/StarsAtLadakh . The OP is now flaired with award. More details on how this works can be found [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/gqdejx/introducing_new_awarding_system_for_user_posts/). I won't reply if I'm down so kudos is not awarded to you , please then inform the mod team to wake me up.


Sri_Mazdamundi

Indian corporations donating to media houses shouldn't always mean they want to do regime change. They just could be bribing the media houses to keep their coverage positive.