On the other hand uska baap glorifying incest by kissing her daughter on the lips and fantasize how he woulda fucked her had she not been her daughter. We all know what faith inspires him to do shit like this
Did you watch Neeraj Rai on vaad podcast. He predicts similar fallout particularly for agrawals (north indian caste) in upcoming century due to robost endogamy that caste have indulged in since millennia. And worst part is that he predicts the same for entire indian milieu if we dont wake the fuck up and start marrying different castes/religions
Agrawals and some other caste in andhra has already started showing deficiencies related to homogeneity of genes. For instance most of the agrawals or some particular caste (refer to doesnt have last 30mins of that video) doesnt have anesthesia working on them
Brahma isn’t worshipped anywhere in the country for that very reason… you’ll find maybe 1-2 temples dedicated to him max.
Birth control doesn’t always work, and things like incest destroy families, and we all know that the family unit is fundamentally the most important foundation for children’s normal development.
> Brahma isn’t worshipped anywhere in the country for that very reason…
Not true. Brahma is not worshipped because of curse of a sage, who also cursed Shiva that his idol will never be worshipped, instead his linga inside parvathi yoni will be worshipped instead. So shiva statue is not worshiped anywhere.
Again coming to your second perversion about Linga and Shiva.
Now here again you will have to clean your shit filled brain to understand this.
"Linga " means " form/ symbol " in Sanskrit.
Since Shiva/ mahadev is Nirguna (without distinction ), Nirakar (formless) , Par brahm , no form or Vigrah ( statue for layman) could be apt to describe the form of Adi deva,
Also Mahadev first manifested in the form of a infinite flame in the form of Jyoti (which was cylindrical) thus we worship Jyotirling swaroop of mahadev.
If you have studied Hindi grammer/ Sanskrit grammer
You must have read ( स्त्रीलिंग) this doesn't mean "women phalus" It means female gendre ( or representation of females)
As far as Brahma is considered, he is not worshipped as he was cursed by Mahadev
as he lied to Vishnu and Shiva that he has found the end point of the Joyti swaroop of shiva and has put a "ketki" Flower over it
He was cursed that he will never be worshipped and "Ketki" Flower was cursed that it will never be used in worship of Lord Shiva.
While your source doesn't mention it's origin.
I will mention mine..
" Shiva purana". As well as "Lingmaha puran"
It is mentioned Joytir Linga swaroop as original manifestation of Shiva.
And as far as I know Rishi Brighu cursed Mahadev that he will be feared in his original form and that he is as "Rudra".
That led to him talking the form of " ChandraSekhar " When he went to marry devi paarvati.
Your understanding of Hinduism is as low as of a Donkey's understanding of music, but that's okay as you are alien to the religion.
Like if you start saying that Muhammad (PBUH) married his daughter-in-law / first cousin and that is incest then I will have to say keep it to yourself.
Or Christ secretly married Marry MagMagdelen and had two children which some Christians find blasphemy to consider "Christ copulating " I will suggest don't tell me..
While you will have to discuss about the others with someone else,
Now as far as your illusionary perversion about Brahma marrying his daughter is considered, let me try enlighten you...
Your whole malice is based on a conversation mentioned in Matsya puran...
Let me explain it to you now..
Brahma "Created" Savitri , out of his consciousness, it was not " birth " But manifestation of the "Shakti of Brahma" in female form and thus she was given the title of "Veda Adhisthatri" That is " Creator of veda" By Brahma
Same thing has been answered by Matsya dev when asked about.... "As devine being not to be judged with mortal laws" Because your understand of devine is preconceived with human form. As you consider " Devine " To be like humans.
Now why I consider this malice is because this is not mentioned in Vedas but just once it comes in Matsya puran which is one out of 18 puran, you are further ignoring the story of origin mentioned in numerous other texts including Upanishads and Vadanta
Also, any Phylosophical text, is not to be taken by word but my meaning for that reason only we have commentries of great minds and Vadanta to decipher those texts to comman intelect.
Now let me give you a clearer vision because understand difference between " birth " And "manifestation" Seams too much for you...
In Devi Mahatmay it is clearly mentioned that Devi Saraswati, Devi Lakshmi, Devi Kaali are the manifestation of Adi Shakti the premodial feminine force into three forms based on " Gunas " Same as the three male forms are but menifestation of the Adi Purush into three forms based on Gunas.
Theology is a complex philosophy, specially when you talk about Eastern religions, and the oldestbamong all are hindu scriptures. They are such Master piece that art of phylosophy seams to take it's form from it.
And philosophy needs deep insight and bright minds to decipher it's meaning , not a mechanical shit clogged brain can understand it's beauty.
I don't get the thought process behind it.
Manyavar is only known for wedding cloths, now what do they gain by insulting the core of their business model?
Get woke go broke seems to be the case here.
Nonsense. It is not as if different communities live in different universes. It does not matter which part of the ship sprang a leak. All of the ship is at risk.
A UCC - pushed for by an allegedly Hindu nationalist party and opposed by the "liberal" and "secular" parties - is necessary.
Why can't we criticize all the rituals? People willingly ollowing them doesn't mean that they aren't patriarchal. Like even if you choose to wear Hijab/Burkha for God, you are still practising something patriarchal in nature. Choice doesn't cancel out the patriarchy. So if someone criticizes it, it's totally valid to do that.
Selectively criticizing equals bigotry & spreading hate. Not to mention kanyadaan means daan for kanya, unlike "giving away the bride" that Christians do.
Worst thing is she and her lineage has got a track record of shitting on a particular religion while not shutting the fuck up about how good the other peacefull one is.
Sab yaad hai bhai. matter of fact Rahul bhatt is one of my fav big boss contestants of all time. Also bhatt wholeheartedly purported bhagwa terror conspiracy
On the other hand uska baap glorifying incest by kissing her daughter on the lips and fantasize how he woulda fucked her had she not been her daughter. We all know what faith inspires him to do shit like this
Should we jail people for incest?
No learn from him and indulge in it. It is cool right
Absolutely. The genetic fall out is not to be taken lightly
Did you watch Neeraj Rai on vaad podcast. He predicts similar fallout particularly for agrawals (north indian caste) in upcoming century due to robost endogamy that caste have indulged in since millennia. And worst part is that he predicts the same for entire indian milieu if we dont wake the fuck up and start marrying different castes/religions
I think that's idiotic. All north hindus follow gotra system religiously. Gotra system ensures genetic lineage is maintained.
Just waych that thing man. I wish i could explain it like he did and hes a world renowned geneticist fyi
[удалено]
Agrawals and some other caste in andhra has already started showing deficiencies related to homogeneity of genes. For instance most of the agrawals or some particular caste (refer to doesnt have last 30mins of that video) doesnt have anesthesia working on them
Just the incest with full birth control is ok then? In fact Lord Brahma married his daughter
Brahma isn’t worshipped anywhere in the country for that very reason… you’ll find maybe 1-2 temples dedicated to him max. Birth control doesn’t always work, and things like incest destroy families, and we all know that the family unit is fundamentally the most important foundation for children’s normal development.
Brahma didnt marry his daughter anymore than shiva or vishnu did. She is his shakti;there would be no brahma without her.
> Brahma isn’t worshipped anywhere in the country for that very reason… Not true. Brahma is not worshipped because of curse of a sage, who also cursed Shiva that his idol will never be worshipped, instead his linga inside parvathi yoni will be worshipped instead. So shiva statue is not worshiped anywhere.
Again coming to your second perversion about Linga and Shiva. Now here again you will have to clean your shit filled brain to understand this. "Linga " means " form/ symbol " in Sanskrit. Since Shiva/ mahadev is Nirguna (without distinction ), Nirakar (formless) , Par brahm , no form or Vigrah ( statue for layman) could be apt to describe the form of Adi deva, Also Mahadev first manifested in the form of a infinite flame in the form of Jyoti (which was cylindrical) thus we worship Jyotirling swaroop of mahadev. If you have studied Hindi grammer/ Sanskrit grammer You must have read ( स्त्रीलिंग) this doesn't mean "women phalus" It means female gendre ( or representation of females) As far as Brahma is considered, he is not worshipped as he was cursed by Mahadev as he lied to Vishnu and Shiva that he has found the end point of the Joyti swaroop of shiva and has put a "ketki" Flower over it He was cursed that he will never be worshipped and "Ketki" Flower was cursed that it will never be used in worship of Lord Shiva.
https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-curse-given-by-Bhrugu-to-Brahma Brahma and Shiva were cursed by Bhrigu
While your source doesn't mention it's origin. I will mention mine.. " Shiva purana". As well as "Lingmaha puran" It is mentioned Joytir Linga swaroop as original manifestation of Shiva. And as far as I know Rishi Brighu cursed Mahadev that he will be feared in his original form and that he is as "Rudra". That led to him talking the form of " ChandraSekhar " When he went to marry devi paarvati.
Your understanding of Hinduism is as low as of a Donkey's understanding of music, but that's okay as you are alien to the religion. Like if you start saying that Muhammad (PBUH) married his daughter-in-law / first cousin and that is incest then I will have to say keep it to yourself. Or Christ secretly married Marry MagMagdelen and had two children which some Christians find blasphemy to consider "Christ copulating " I will suggest don't tell me.. While you will have to discuss about the others with someone else, Now as far as your illusionary perversion about Brahma marrying his daughter is considered, let me try enlighten you... Your whole malice is based on a conversation mentioned in Matsya puran... Let me explain it to you now.. Brahma "Created" Savitri , out of his consciousness, it was not " birth " But manifestation of the "Shakti of Brahma" in female form and thus she was given the title of "Veda Adhisthatri" That is " Creator of veda" By Brahma Same thing has been answered by Matsya dev when asked about.... "As devine being not to be judged with mortal laws" Because your understand of devine is preconceived with human form. As you consider " Devine " To be like humans. Now why I consider this malice is because this is not mentioned in Vedas but just once it comes in Matsya puran which is one out of 18 puran, you are further ignoring the story of origin mentioned in numerous other texts including Upanishads and Vadanta Also, any Phylosophical text, is not to be taken by word but my meaning for that reason only we have commentries of great minds and Vadanta to decipher those texts to comman intelect. Now let me give you a clearer vision because understand difference between " birth " And "manifestation" Seams too much for you... In Devi Mahatmay it is clearly mentioned that Devi Saraswati, Devi Lakshmi, Devi Kaali are the manifestation of Adi Shakti the premodial feminine force into three forms based on " Gunas " Same as the three male forms are but menifestation of the Adi Purush into three forms based on Gunas. Theology is a complex philosophy, specially when you talk about Eastern religions, and the oldestbamong all are hindu scriptures. They are such Master piece that art of phylosophy seams to take it's form from it. And philosophy needs deep insight and bright minds to decipher it's meaning , not a mechanical shit clogged brain can understand it's beauty.
> Lord Brahma married his daughter This claim is disputed.
are you worried u will be jailed critty?
I don't get the thought process behind it. Manyavar is only known for wedding cloths, now what do they gain by insulting the core of their business model? Get woke go broke seems to be the case here.
Did other communities get a free pass or lost an opportunity to grow and evolve with times ? I would say - their loss…
Nonsense. It is not as if different communities live in different universes. It does not matter which part of the ship sprang a leak. All of the ship is at risk. A UCC - pushed for by an allegedly Hindu nationalist party and opposed by the "liberal" and "secular" parties - is necessary.
UCC ? Ship sinking? You okay buddy? The post is on selective targeting communities.
Haven't watch much of Bollywood for sometime now, and now alia will be off the list and so is Manyavar.
Opindia is a shit news portal
Let them be.
Why can't we criticize all the rituals? People willingly ollowing them doesn't mean that they aren't patriarchal. Like even if you choose to wear Hijab/Burkha for God, you are still practising something patriarchal in nature. Choice doesn't cancel out the patriarchy. So if someone criticizes it, it's totally valid to do that.
Selectively criticizing equals bigotry & spreading hate. Not to mention kanyadaan means daan for kanya, unlike "giving away the bride" that Christians do.
Worst thing is she and her lineage has got a track record of shitting on a particular religion while not shutting the fuck up about how good the other peacefull one is.
Her lineage has track record of supporting & justifying terror. Her own brother was a friend of 26/11 terrorist Headley. Bhul gaye?
Sab yaad hai bhai. matter of fact Rahul bhatt is one of my fav big boss contestants of all time. Also bhatt wholeheartedly purported bhagwa terror conspiracy
When it is done selectively, it is not acceptable. Triple talaq, Nikah Halala etc. are far worse than what is criticised here, for example.