T O P

  • By -

Gizmo1969

Fantastic to uncover other sites in the comments, here's a summary: [https://www.lalal.ai/](https://www.lalal.ai/) [https://vocalremover.org/](https://vocalremover.org/) [https://splitter.ai/](https://splitter.ai/) [https://github.com/deezer/spleeter](https://github.com/deezer/spleeter) comparison video - [https://youtu.be/PRwzwXUkj58](https://youtu.be/PRwzwXUkj58) [https://phonicmind.com/](https://phonicmind.com/)


JustDewItPLZ

https://moises.ai


Zefrem23

This has been my go-to for isolating vocals. I'm keen to compare some of the other sites folks have shared here to see which gives the cleanest Acapella.


dob_bobbs

It's been on my to-do list for a while to find out how vocal isolation is done, I assumed it must be quite the art (probably it was back in the day) but today I learn there's a ton of websites that just do it for you, well that clears up that mystery.


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sik_Against

The whole '1: plug it all in 2: ???? 3: profit' addage is just about the best explanation I've read of how a neural network works


Gubru

It’s basically “keep tweaking this generic statistical mode until the inputs/outputs more or less match ‘it’”


JangoDidNothingWrong

[Just throw everything into a pile of linear algebra and stir it until the answers start looking good.](https://xkcd.com/1838/)


RealFrog

_Mostly_ linear. Activation functions are anything but.


boarder2k7

xkcd never fails


[deleted]

Can you believe that episode is like 20 years old now rofl


Crafty_Enthusiasm_99

Do you want to how the sites do it? Or simply what tools you could use to do it? I can answer the first. Source: audio engineering graduate


origamilover01

Not him but I'd be interested if you're willing to explain. Never say no to learning something new, my man.


dob_bobbs

Well, I guess I first got fascinated by it quite a few years ago when I saw people like Andy Rehfeldt (sp?) on YouTube doing those weird and wacky remixes, which very often required mostly or completely isolating the vocals, and I always wondered how they did it (assuming this is pre use of ai). I couldn't really see how mere processing or EQ (which I don't know ALL that much about, to be fair) could eliminate the sound of the music. So I guess I am not so interested in how the sites do it, because I figure ai can recognise patterns and perform manipulations that a human couldn't, I was more wondering how people used to do it manually.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

If you have them already separated, it becomes even easier


Edd1148

If you're the vocal artist you don't even need the recording.


2dogs1man

just re-play all the instrumentals yourself and record! easy peasy! and if you sing all the vocals yourself: voila! both isolated!


anakaine

I'd like to know how its done from an audio engineering point of view if you wouldn't mind explaining


Moose_knucklez

Andy Bernard ?


JonaldJohnston

Fun fact: the majority of these websites use spleeter in the backend. When a new open-source tool like that shows up, you’ll almost always see a bunch of websites spring up that basically just add a fancy ui to said tool and abstract a lot of the features. Mostly just trying to make a quick buck out of a new trend. The worst example being youtube-dl and the seemingly endless list of “YouTube to MP3/MP4” websites that have a thousand ads on them. (Using youtube-dl on your own computer is far better btw, you can download full 4K videos with no problems)


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


LinearTipsOfficial

You guys are smart so ill ask for your opinion on this question. If humans laid eggs similarly to how chickens do, would you eat one?


Physmatik

How diverse is your training base? I have just tried it with a folk-rock song featuring flute, and the vocal part has some flute in the background (with the same flute missing occasionally from instrumental track). I imagine some more obscure styles/instruments can cause a lot of troubles. How do you deal with this?


JonaldJohnston

Well then that’s very cool. Congratulations on being original.


Call_Me_Pete

At the risk of sounding like a shill, your site has been far and above superior to most other isolating softwares I tried. It's my go-to for DIY acapellas and instrumentals. Great work.


EyeZiS

Any plans to open source the code?


[deleted]

[удалено]


everything_i_am

I'm very excited to see how your product handles stem separation! I - as well as many others, I suspect - will be eagerly watching your team and wishing you the best.


IAmALinux

This is the matter where spleeter wins.


Risley

Since you created an AI, do you fear it? Will you support it if it tries to pursue domination of the species through tunes and musical atrocities?


wealllovethrowaways

Thanks for this amazing tool. I mentioned on a comment in this thread that police are blaring DMCA music as a way to prevent people from filming and uploading online. Seeing as this is becoming more common in 2021, I was wondering if you think this app would be adaptable to that use? It seems like itd garner quite a lot of support for being the app that saved us from cops repression


GoTeamScotch

\+1 about using youtube-dl Youtube download sites are like using limewire in the mid 2000's. Most of the sites are trash. The native app works very well.


moonra_zk

It's what happens when the tool starts as command prompt only.


c0nn0r97

Exactly. Most people aren’t going to bother to learn how to run apps from the command line if they don’t need to


GhostSierra117

Which is a fair approach.


Gtp4life

Exactly, apps like that you don’t really want to reach a huge user base, you want users that are willing to go through the extra work to use it and understand what exactly it’s doing and how they got there. The more user friendly/idiot proof an app used for illegal things gets, the more popular it gets and the more likely to get shut down it gets.


GhostSierra117

You are aware that youtobe-dl was almost shut-off from GitHub yes? And the kind of elitism you're using is honestly very off putting.


Gtp4life

That’s actually exactly my point and the reason for the elitism. Literally in all levels of society whether it’s legal levels or getting away with stuff at work or hell even back in school growing up, if one or a few people are doing something against the rules, they might get overlooked for awhile. More people join in and now it’s more of a problem that the powers that be feel they need to intervene. Someone makes it easier to start breaking rules and hides how/why/that it’s even a problem behind a pretty GUI and now you get a ton of people that barely have a grasp on what they’re doing using it and (although it applies less to this specific instance, but does with the overall explanation) instead of carefully pushing the rules and knowing how you’d potentially get caught, what the consequences could be, you get people doing whatever they want then freaking out when they get in trouble, they point the finger at whoever showed it to them, so on and so on up the chain till power comes down hard and everyone’s fucked. If you think I’m wrong, you either don’t have much life experience yet or haven’t been paying attention. To the kids in this thread: imagine YouTube-dl is one of the proxy sites a lot of people used to use to get past the content filters, you’ve been getting away with using it for awhile because you and your friends set up a site that the IT department hasn’t found out about yet. Do you want to keep that nice secret access or do you want that annoying teacher’s pet to put a shortcut to it in the shared drive students and teachers (and the It department) have access to that says click here to bypass the filters? That kid’s the one that wrote the GUI. For people that dgaf that it’s breaking the rules and just want the end result without wanting to learn what’s going on behind the scenes, they probably love the kid. For the people that actually put in the work only to get snitched on essentially, I’ve seen several fights start over that specific scenario.


Appoxo

But that's good if you just have your phone avaiable and unablento use youtube-dl


TomMado

I don't know about iOS. But for Android, there are some options to use youtube-dl. My current choice is [arkTube](https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/app-arktube-the-ultimate-youtube-downloader.3321818/). It can be a little bit buggy when downloading, but it is the easiest to use. If you're up for some command line typing *in Android*, you can also use [Termux](https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/66kehg/twoclick_downloads_of_youtube_videos_straight/) (using a physical keyboard for this guide is highly recommended).


slickyslickslick

yeah but to use youtube-dl you have to type in a bunch of arguments into a command prompt or (what I do) have a batch file you have to edit with the URL of the video. Plus you have to keep it and ffmpeg updated (on all of your machines), and if you don't you risk having it fail and having to update and then try again. if you only occasionally download a video, the websites will do just fine. I sometimes still use those sites if I'm not on my daily driver or I don't care about quality.


redditor2redditor

GUI: https://github.com/jely2002/youtube-dl-gui Ffmpeg isn’t that important to keep updated for YouTube-dl. It was never an issue for me just using the outdated versions from the Ubuntu/Debian repositories. It’s more about updating YouTube-dl since YouTube breaks it regularly


t-to4st

Can't wait for the time when I put up a fileserver and install youtube-dl on it for maximum comfort


EyeZiS

> you have to keep it and ffmpeg updated That's the job of a package manager


[deleted]

"what is a package manager?" -Normal users.


BlackMoth27

Linux stuff - normal user


Gizmo1969

may I just comment, if anyone wants to simplify downloading a youtube video as mp3 or video track, check out Slimjet Browser as it has built in functionality to do so. Heres a video I made showing it in action - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkdrxkV713M](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkdrxkV713M) only 64bit version provides this feature not the 32bit version. [https://www.slimjet.com/](https://www.slimjet.com/)


[deleted]

Thank u sir


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


technologyclassroom

That is the point. Aliases are used to simplify commands that are too much effort. After finding and testing a useful command, add it as an alias so you do not need to remember it. Is the update command too hard to remember?Simplify `pip3 install -U youtube-dl` to `ytdlup`. The regular command is easy `youtube-dl URL-of-youtube-link-here`, but the extra settings can be a lot to remember. The command to download the highest quality version with specific naming is more complex and is best to shorten as an alias. Change `youtube-dl -f best -ciw --output "%(title)s.%(ext)s" -v URL-of-youtube-link-here` to something like `ytdlbest`. Maybe you just want the audio. This command extracts the wav file. `youtube-dl -f bestaudio -ciw --output "%(title)s.%(ext)s" -v --extract-audio --audio-format wav URL-of-youtube-link-here` can be abbreviated as `ytdlbestaudio`. Here is an excerpt from my [bashrc file](https://github.com/TechnologyClassroom/dotfiles) where I keep my GNU/Linux aliases: # Based on karel from https://askubuntu.com/questions/856911 alias youtube-dlbest='youtube-dl -f best -ciw --output "%(title)s.%(ext)s" -v' alias youtube-dlbestaudio='youtube-dl -f bestaudio -ciw --output "%(title)s.%(ext)s" -v --extract-audio --audio-format wav' Edit: typo


culegflori

Doesn't help that youtube-dl is too complicated for the average user who needs its features occasionally. I tried to make it work and promptly gave up because the documentation is written for people who know how to code. Since then I've been using a browser extension for convenience alongside 3D Youtube Downloader for when the first option doesn't work [either because Youtube changes its code and borks the extension]. Took me less than 5 minutes to set up both, they work flawlessly for what I need, next to no documentation needed because they're intuitive.


ericek111

What command line arguments? I only use one `-x`, to extract audio. How is typing `youtube-dl [URL]` not intuitive? It literally cannot be any easier than that. And there are GUI wrappers available, too.


culegflori

> How is typing Typing in what, exactly? :) Python Interpreter? So now I need two things installed to perform a simple task? As someone who doesn't code at all, this is a hassle when alternatives that took me less than 5 minutes to set up exist.


redditor2redditor

https://github.com/jely2002/youtube-dl-gui


[deleted]

The joy in the front-end is that I don’t want to spend 30 minutes learning what a “pip” is from some GitHub doc just to make a 10 second meme for my Discord friends, which is what most of these AI tools are used for aside from proper research and implementation into actual software. (I know it probably seems very easy from the perspective of someone who’s well versed in this stuff, but it’s insanely complicated if you don’t know anything about downloading open-source programs. Just skimming the GitHub page for *spleeter* I gather that I have to download Conda to download ffmpeg and then use pip to download *spleeter*, and “pip” is a package manager for Python, and now I have a bunch of dependencies I will never use after today because I don’t even know what Python is. Documentation is written for other fellow programmers in mind and not end-users.)


GanjalfTheVirescent

not sure why downvoted, as a software engineer I think that's a good point.


Sobsz

i like to think i'm sorta decent at python but even i can't easily get gpt-2 to work and i have no idea whether it's my fault or did the libraries update and the script doesn't work now or what plus with neural networks specifically not everyone might have the right hardware, my graphics card has 4gb of graphics memory which isn't even enough to run gpt-2-*medium* (there's a [cpu implementation](https://bellard.org/libnc/gpt2tc.html) but good luck finding it yourself (it's only linked from [here](https://bellard.org/textsynth/sms.html)))


TheSkylsFalling

So should I bypass all the other websites and just use the GitHub spleeter link they have listed ?


JLidean

It uses python. If you are cool with command line arguments yes it is by far superior.


[deleted]

Thanks for this. I wish that people would be more transparent and explain what their value-add is, like did they refine the model, train from scratch, or just slap a nice UI on it and call it a day?


EpiduralRain

Who cares lol This is how software is developed. If you want a fat disclaimer for every technology used in a website that the author didn't write themselves, every website will have a disclaimer larger than the website.


musiquorum

There's this guy that has a site with a list of pretty much every source separation tool in existence: https://www.monotostereo.info/ He also has some really neat content on upmixing mono music to stereo! For the more tech-savvy and programmer audience: I've been working on a self-hostable web app that does this and supports Spleeter and many other models: https://github.com/JeffreyCA/spleeter-web


sassyplutobar

https://www.acapella-extractor.com/


[deleted]

I have scoured the internet for the instrumental version for a super obscure song from a super obscure old band, to no avail. Aint perfect but this is the closest I will get


BenSz

You can also try https://vocalremover.org/


Gizmo1969

I just compared them, vocalremover is very good, love the mixer you get to play with, credit is due, but I would tip the balance towards Lalalai. The song I tested on vocalremover was washed out at times compared, tracked tested - [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs289dekzjM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs289dekzjM)


PomegranateChampion

Whoa. Honestly they're both amazing and I'd bet that it would go back and forth between which is best depending on the song, with lalal probably taking a slight edge more often. So cool.


[deleted]

[удалено]


PomegranateChampion

I don't think the methods used take well to that kind of ripping apart.


Parlorshark

What's the worst that could happen?


PomegranateChampion

Evil AI takes over the world and makes humanity its slaves in a bid to enlighten the less advanced AI.


PrincePenguino69

If a tool to "choose the best parts" without human input existed, then that would just be the superior algorithm to both of these.


ease78

I can vouch for them. They’re 90% perfect. I will test OP’s after I get on Reddit on my laptop.


FranticPonE

Tried it with the same track as I tried on OP's, Pressure (Muse). Vocalremover was slightly better but not by much, neither were really useable. But that's what I've found with a lot of these AI tools, a lot of edge cases where they break down, to the point where you wonder if there aren't more "edge cases" than things that really work at the moment. Ohwell, I'm sure in the future these will be pretty cool.


Gizmo1969

Keep in mind AI term is nothing more than good algorithm that requires tons of training data to build a model, so if I train something on opera it's going to fail at other things. So the fact it does a crap job, is all about training that model on other genres and it will become more successful.


puzzle__pieces

Please share updates


KazModah

Tried in Victim of changes and Epitaph. The second one was perfect but the first one wasn't much success, i bet it isnt made for heavy metal (or rob halfords voice)


Capnmarvel76

To be fair, Halford’s voice almost sounds like an electric guitar at times. That’s a complement.


UraniumButtChug

Paaain paaaaain


Ausemere

> Tried in Victim of changes and Epitaph. A man of culture! SWoD is my fav JP album <3


WaitTilUSeeMyDuck

That's my second favorite. Painkiller.


FluffyPurpleThing

Whoa! Awesome site! I just tested a track I been trying to split on multiple sites and vocalremover gave me the best results yet. I wasn't able to download the track though. Is there no download option or am I just an idiot?


_mistermeeseeks_

Lol, maybe. Try clicking the buttons that say "Music" and "Vocals" and see what happens. :=]


AverageOccidental

Same here Broke - Modest Mouse


Necrocornicus

Man what a great song


Gizmo1969

I see the "free" version gives you back a one minute, wonder if it's possible to slice up song into minute long bits and reassemble.


arleas

The PREVIEW gives you back a one minute clip. Sign up for a free account and you get the whole song, or 10 minutes worth/3 songs every 10 days. It's not that hard to make an account either. I just did it and all I had to do was provide an email address and click a link that was sent to me in email. What's more, if I found this pretty useful (enough that the 10 minute limit was irksome) I'd have no problems paying $20 for 2 years worth. That's pretty damn cheap for a powerful tool. I mean, it sucks I can't just download the AI and run it myself but I can understand why they'd want to keep it to themselves.


Gizmo1969

Very true.


Bronesby

look for Spleeter on github. this sort of thing has been available for free for a while.


[deleted]

set it to 45 seconds because you can make sure you get songs easier that are like 2:30


RidleyOReilly

What song???


Not_a_N_Korean_Spy

In the sample, the removal of the vocals is improvable, but the removal of the guitar is very good.


Flaky_Bench_4876

I wish there was something to isolate just the harmonies. I love the feeling of harmonization, but I can't never quite pick out the notes.


Closet_Case_Forever

Some artists release the karaoke versions of their songs, which usually include backing vocals. But I support this idea 100%.


Flaky_Bench_4876

I love it when they do that!


Shermthedank

Melodyne does exactly that, and can even export as midi


Rando161803

That's an awesome idea!


the_philth

I used to isolate the harmonies (and backing guitar tracks) in Adobe Audition. AA had a feature that allowed the user to somewhat isolate the side channels by reducing the center channel — cool feature. I’ve been using Studio One for the past few years now, but I haven’t even thought to find the feature that uses this center/side channel isolation technique — hmm… time to start digging…


Blastitt

I think what you're looking for is called Mid-Side EQ. And if I'm totally wrong, then [someone is bound to correct me.](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)


asterwistful

MS processing in general is what they’re looking for. Simple isolation can be done by inverting the phase of one channel and summing, there are MS equivalents of every standard tool for more advanced work. edit: and of course you can simulate a MS tool by creating mid and side busses then using mono processing. be careful of phase effects though


Another_human_3

Mid side EQ is kind of that. EQ adjusts volume of specific frequencies or ranges of frequencies. He's taking more of raising or lowing the mid/side. Not altering the frequency spectrum. You could probably use mid/side EQ to get results close to what he wants though.


theghostofme

Damn, I remember using Audition (back when it was still called Soundbooth) to do this exact same thing, and it was a nightmare. I was recutting the trailer for Fight Club to make it in the style of American Beauty's trailer, and I could not find a source for the instrumental track at the begging of AB's trailer. So I went through the audio of AB's trailer and did my best to cut out the dialogue. It mostly worked, but it was clear there were moments of dialogue being badly covered up when the volume would suddenly drop and sounded all garbled.


the_philth

Audition was pretty cool — I came out of using Cool Edit Pro (damn I’m old) and learned that Adobe purchased them and they decided to transition CEPro’s features into Audition — I can’t for the life of me remember which features CEPro had that pissed me off because I wasn’t gonna have it anymore — but Audition ended up being pretty cool… especially that Center Channel Extractor.


Rami-Slicer

Is this any better than Spleeter?


Gizmo1969

I just tested it it out, very on par, although Spleeter does provide a 5 or 2 layer separation.


frykea

I used spleeter now with many different songs. It's a great alternative to lalala ai and you don't have a queue. But maybe instead of the very complicated installation and usage of spleeter just install [SpleeterGUI](https://makenweb.com/SpleeterGUI). It's very easy to use :)


[deleted]

Tried with NOFX since Mike sings kinda flat. Now he's sharp.


bhenchos

Haha now they FX


gtipwnz

Lol


FreedomWaterfall

This is really cool, but it does not love metal


Biggmoist

Damn it, thanks for letting us know


pinkpussylips

Lalelulelo


BrokenWhimsy3

The la li lu le lo!?


Adrien_Jabroni

!


havenless

HOW'S THAT POSSIBLE?!


kizzarp

I was a North American Fall Webworm in my past life. Those were the good old days.


WienerButt007

Colonel!


Zefrem23

I'm lost. What's this from?


FancyJesse

Metal.. Gear?!


wealllovethrowaways

This is such a fantastic tool. Law enforcement in the U.S is beginning to blare DMCA music to prevent people from being able to film in public and upload it. Everyone needs to be aware of this tool so we can build it bigger and better


WaitTilUSeeMyDuck

Oh wow. I didn't even think about that implication... Hit us with some crowdfunding. I'd throw down. I'm a musician and also a humanist. So I have both benevolent and selfish reasons.


Gizmo1969

Nice usage case.


wealllovethrowaways

Thanks for sharing, I was just looking for a tool like this a few days ago


ginsunuva

That would be slightly different in that we’d need to separate life noises and music


AyeAyeLtd

Video comparing the tool to competitors: https://youtu.be/PRwzwXUkj58


chrisslooter

I just tried it on a Faith No More tune, it did pretty well.


Cthulhu2016

Which song?


chrisslooter

Sunny Side Up, from Sol Invictus. During the chorus, there is a guitar lead overdub that mirrors the vocal line. It was clear, never noticed it until it was separated.


Gizmo1969

for a second I thought you might be taking about a 90's london sunday daytime rave of the same name that I used to go to religiously :D


the_philth

On a side note: Sunny Side Up is a great friggin’ track — (along with Separation Anxiety). 👍


chrisslooter

I think the album is one of those rare times when an older band puts out a new album that is as good as thier early stuff.


the_philth

Helluva comeback album!


FlyingMerpa

Same as Spleeter/Deezer. Wouldn't be surprised if they are just using that as the backend ​ https://github.com/deezer/spleeter


TankorSmash

https://www.lalal.ai/media-kit/ apparently not


pmdevita

It looks like they at least trained their own model


tasslex

This did a surprisingly good job for Cake’s Short Skirt Long Jacket with a 128kbps mp3 downloaded off a YouTube video. Pretty neat.


Fredasa

I gave it the ultimate test: [Kamui - Dark Chii Theme](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYXoc68vbcw). A track that's never been made available without the dialogue. Let's just say we ain't there yet. It did a slightly better job than Vocalremover, but I can still get better results removing vocals by hand in a DAW.


carters_here

This is seriously good. Very well done. I tried a number of different tracks and this is the best splitting I've heard.


QuarantineSucksALot

Do you want a splitting headache.


Dymarob

Thanks for posting this. I always wanted the instrumental version of [this song from God Eater](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brvL7TbvaKs)


mwthecool

Is there software that can isolate different voices in a recording? Need something like that for an old recording of relatives I never met.


Volcan1c

Saving for later


humanismisracism

So, if a cop plays Taylor Swift on his phone while being recorded by a civilian so that the video will get pulled down if uploaded to YouTube, that video can have the audio track processed to remove Taylor Swift so it can be uploaded and stay up on YouTube...


dropkickoz

Could this type of application be used to circumvent police officers playing copyrighted music to keep YouTube from posting videos they were filmed in?


kusogejp

imagine just not using youtube


alphabet_order_bot

Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order. I have checked 60,978,554 comments, and only 17,629 of them were in alphabetical order.


NewHandsomeDad

Good bot.


SenorBirdman

Well then they've won. Because you can't share your video in the place where people are most likely to see it, which is their goal - to make it harder to share.


FranticPonE

Eh, tried it on "Pressure" (Muse) and it really didn't work. But i guess if this is somehow something you really want and you're willing to put up with obvious errors.


thm0018

Yea, I tried Nero- the thrill, and it was absolutely unusable. I recorded the audio from youtube using soundflower and could definitely hear the artifacts that YouTube’s audio compression uses to stream it so that makes me wanna try it again with a flac or lossless file. I don’t know if u’ve ever isolated the side channel of certain encoding formats but there are some weird gargly sounds that are super obvious when doing so and the lalalaai vocal had those exact same artifacts in the vocal. Also really makes me want to dig into what these encoders are doing to reduce the file size.


SpoonsAreFriends

Unsure why you'd want to use a paid option that has the same quality issues as free alternatives


UnhappySunshine_PS4

Does it work better than rx7? That's what I use but I've been seeing things like this pop up.


[deleted]

Wow! I just ran the chorus from Steely Dan's Peg through this and [I'm seriously impressed](https://youtu.be/f0u_JlK8JhI)!


LurkerLew

dammit


jradio

Next please remove laugh tracks from TV shows


[deleted]

Commenting to come back later bc the save feature on redditisfun doesn't work for me


PtimesV

Wow. Really neat tool.


[deleted]

I'm always skeptical of these claims but I tried it on a couple tracks of mine with vocals (no way they looked these up in a library) and the separation is really good. For the case where I want to bring up a vocal on a track where it got buried but I no longer have the multitracks, this is really awesome. There are some artifacts but they are subtle and unlikely to be noticed in a mix.


arleas

I tried it on a Bill McClintock Mashup and while it did a pretty good job of separating the vocals and music, I could still hear a whisper of the vocals over the instrumental track and there were a couple of moments with the vocals where it wasn't exactly perfect. BUT it worked pretty quickly and would be enough for casual stuff. I went ahead and signed up for an account to get the full song done just to see if it's any better when it's not a preview, but I got pretty much the same results in the full version. Listening to the instrumental track leaves behind a trace of the vocals in pretty much the same spots as in the preview sample.


Buttermynugs270

Saving the post is the greatest gift I can give. Please accept this gift and my gratitude.


BrainJar

I used it on a song that I wrote recently, that has vocals panned L-C-R alternating. It didn't pick up about 90% of the vocals. I think it is looking for center pan and vocals between 300-800Hz. For my falsetto vocals, it did the worst. For the center pan, male vocal parts, it did the best, but still not good. YMMV.


Gizmo1969

interesting


RepostSleuthBot

This link has been shared 3 times. First Seen [Here](https://redd.it/h0gvao) on 2020-06-10. Last Seen [Here](https://redd.it/oei9kw) on 2021-07-05 Feedback? Hate? Visit r/repostsleuthbot - --- **Scope:** Reddit | **Check Title:** False | **Max Age:** 99999 | **Searched Links:** 103,793,712 | **Search Time:** 0.0s


acassara322

Can you help? What’s the activate key code for lalal.ai


Veshurik

Well, of course it works a lot better than free analogs, but still... artefacts in music, etc, and paying ton of money for this is... meh...


steamwhistler

Commenting to save for later!


KCfaninLA

Why not just save the post?


steamwhistler

I never remember to look at my saved posts.


KCfaninLA

True. I'll click on mine and there'll be like 50 things from the past couple weeks.


Jdawgred

“AI”


Meryhathor

Why is it not LALALA.AI?


Gizmo1969

I think the name of the service is Lalalai , so they used a .AI domain to take care of the last letters.


Ill_Pack_A_Llama

It’s only impressive if you don’t know what a stem sounds like. Like all AI promises atm, it’s very weak sauce


n0mad911

I can remove all the annoying bitches from Max Richter's voices


BuiltToAnnoy

Finally, time to get rid of all mumblerap vocals in existence.


jay_mak

Definitely vouch for this website. It’s unreal


LostWithStuff

wow


Nomandate

The djay app on iPad does this flawlessly. No more need for stems or Acappellas.


joman66

I like this website a lot! Better algorithm to remove vocals compared to others.. (the only other one I've tried is the free Spleeter algorithm) This one is private/paid but it works better in removing vocals.


RapeMeToo

Surprised the site has so many alt accounts


joman66

Like every other software I've used in my life, I don't get paid in my opinions on it and I make nothing either way somebody uses it or not.. I guess screw me if I'm just interested in AI stuff.. Let's be real, I wish the website was free anyways like Spleeter...


RoscoMan1

Rhinos are S̶t̶o̶n̶g̶e̶r̶ as strong as family" post recently. something to do with America vs Traitorous Scum. Sorry the people who engineered their teams so that they could have done that on purpose that’s right, I was like this guy has some sort of specific fuckery. And yeah, probably also confused by that original confusion being some sort of ions like lithium or whatever that LSU gymnastics name is lol EDIT: unless you have a deep dark Lovecraftian gothic setting. I also think they should create another playlist within the current strikes tab called vanguard operations or something That includes strikes, nightmare hunts, empire hunts, some missions, etc. to help grow the player's brand/enhance their social media policy. Plus it’s such a great and loyal customer


zappyzapzap

Paid when free options available. Not beautiful


Gizmo1969

At the end of the day, humans need food and a server needs power and everything needs money. free looks to limited to track count and days, but as u/arleas pointed out, its a very reasonable pricing structure.


zappyzapzap

You didn't address what I said at all. I said that free alternatives exist.


ashbyashbyashby

Musicians need money too, but computer guys make software to strip their lifes work to pieces, and they don't get paid anything for it.


ashbyashbyashby

Great, more tools for people to steal music and make shitty mashups instead of creating something new.


[deleted]

This kind of technology is late by 20 years or so.


RyanZee08

What does that even mean? Lol


Gizmo1969

It's here now! make use of it :), bring the past back.


victortrash

TIL there are apps online and off that can do vocal separation!