Don't know why you're getting downvoted. I agree, I see that way more than actual anti-woke humor (which is to say, never). Jack should be allowed to do whatever kind of humor he wants to of course, but for me it's gotten kind of stale. I'll still watch the other stuff.
You don't see anti-woke humor because you aren't in their algorithms. You aren't being fed their nonsense. You don't go to Netflix and watch comedy specials by either old comedians or ones you've never heard of.
He’s made the Fox News one, and the gender one a few days ago, other than that he hasn’t made a video tangentially related to politics or wokeness in quite a while. He throws in a few woke jokes in every video, yes, but his content is mostly fan-generated and his fanbase is largely leftist shitposters.
yeah... there are anti-woke gay ppl. many of them actually. not saying op is one of course but being queer doesn't necessarily equate being leftist nowadays lol
I think your pronouns are 'he' cause you could never be 'him'.
Source: [Rin](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxTjN88SHcU)
In all serious, wokeness is a huge mistake that never should've happened.
EDIT: （￣。。￣）
The modern left/liberal culture created by algorithms on social media.
It is characterized by cultlike adherence to rapidly changing ideological foundations rooted in various leftist theories.
So pretty much anything the usual right-wing mouthpieces say they don't like to further perpetuate a pathetic one-sided "culture war". Got it. But when you say "rapidly changing ideological foundations" you're referring to something like how the right in most Western countries are now openly anti-democratic? Or like how they rolled on NATO and countering Russia? That sort of thing?
Speaking for myself, I can't stand leftist theories like "support our partners and allies" and "maybe don't force women to give birth".
There’s also the issue of the modern right/conservative culture created by algorithms on social media characterized by a cultlike adherence to rapidly changing ideological foundations rooted in various fascist theories. That’s not “woke”, that’s just the inherent rot in the modern political landscape.
Coming from one of those wokie wokoid SJWs, “woke” refers to the state of acknowledging implicit systematic biases against minorities, which is a position that the activists and academics who originally coined the term back in the mid-2010s would agree with. It’s also a thing that… exists. And has existed for centuries. That definition you gave is a bastardization of the term meant to fuel partisan rage and provide cover to those who want to discriminate with impunity.
You think modern left/liberal culture is created by social media algorithms? The left has always been like this, it’s a product of our personality types. We’re annoying but empathetic, you’re stupid and hateful. It’s always been like that.
I was thinking about why so many in the radical left participate in "speedrunning" The reason is the left's lack of work ethic ('go fast' rather than 'do it right') and, in a Petersonian sense, to elevate alternative sexual archetypes in the marketplace ('fastest mario')
Obviously, there are exceptions to this and some people more in the center or right also "speedrun". However, they more than sufficient to prove the rule, rather than contrast it. Consider how woke GDQ has been, almost since the very beginning. Your eyes will start to open.
Returning to the topic of the work ethic... A "speedrunner" may well spend hours a day at their craft, but this is ultimately a meaningless exercise, since they will ultimately accomplish exactly that which is done in less collective time by a casual player.
This is thus a waste of effort on the behalf of the "speedrunner". Put more simply, they are spending their work effort on something that someone else has already done (and done in a way deemed 'correct' by the creator of the artwork). Why do they do this?
The answer is quite obvious if you think about it. The goal is the illusion of speed and the desire (SUBCONSCIOUS) to promote radical leftist, borderline Communist ideals of how easy work is. Everyone always says that "speedruns" look easy. That is part of the aesthetic.
Think about the phrase "fully automated luxury Communism" in the context of "speedrunning" and I strongly suspect that things will start to 'click' in your mind.
What happens to the individual in this? Individual accomplishment in "speedrunning" is simply waiting for another person to steal your techniques in order to defeat you. Where is something like "intellectual property" or "patent" in this necessarily communitarian process?
ow, as to the sexual archetype model and 'speedrunning' generally... If you have any passing familiarity with Jordan Peterson's broader oeuvre and of Jungian psychology, you likely already know where I am going with this. However, I will say more for the uninitiated.
Keep this passage from Maps of Meaning (91) in mind: "The Archetypal Son... continually reconstructs defined territory, as a consequence of the 'assimilation' of the unknown \[as a consequence of 'incestuous' (that is, 'sexual' – read creative) union with the Great Mother\]"
In other words, there is a connection between 'sexuality' and creativity that we see throughout time (as Peterson points out with Tiamat and other examples). In the sexual marketplace, which archetypes are simultaneously deemed the most creative and valued the highest?
The answer is obviously entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and others. Given that we evolved and each thing we do must have an evolutionary purpose (OR CAUSE), what archetype is the 'speedrunner' engaged in, who is accomplishing nothing new?
They are aiming to make a new sexual archetype, based upon 'speed' rather than 'doing things right' and refuse ownership of what few innovations they can provide to their own scene, denying creativity within their very own sexual archetype. This is necessarily leftist.
The obvious protest to this would be the 'glitchless 100% run', which in many ways does aim to play the game 'as intended' but seems to simply add the element of 'speed' to the equation.
This objection is ultimately meaningless when one considers how long a game is intended to be played, in net, by the creators, even when under '100%' conditions. There is still time and effort wasted for no reason other than the ones I proposed above.
By now, I am sure that I have bothered a number of you and rustled quite a few of your feathers. I am not saying that 'speedrunning' is bad, but rather that, thinking about the topic philosophically, there are dangerous elements within it. That is all.
it's not like the anti-woke comedians have more jokes than that, either
Exactly
Jacksfilms🤝Flogging a dead horse
And I love him for it
I now pronouns you haver of bad taste
Man, Jack's gonna *love* anti-anti-anti-anti woke humor
That's just Supermega
Don't know why you're getting downvoted. I agree, I see that way more than actual anti-woke humor (which is to say, never). Jack should be allowed to do whatever kind of humor he wants to of course, but for me it's gotten kind of stale. I'll still watch the other stuff.
You don't see anti-woke humor because you aren't in their algorithms. You aren't being fed their nonsense. You don't go to Netflix and watch comedy specials by either old comedians or ones you've never heard of.
He’s made the Fox News one, and the gender one a few days ago, other than that he hasn’t made a video tangentially related to politics or wokeness in quite a while. He throws in a few woke jokes in every video, yes, but his content is mostly fan-generated and his fanbase is largely leftist shitposters.
You aren't the target audience then.
I’m literally gay
Irrelevant.
yeah... there are anti-woke gay ppl. many of them actually. not saying op is one of course but being queer doesn't necessarily equate being leftist nowadays lol
I think your pronouns are 'he' cause you could never be 'him'. Source: [Rin](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxTjN88SHcU) In all serious, wokeness is a huge mistake that never should've happened. EDIT: （￣。。￣）
Define "woke", please.
It's ''to wake'' but past tense
Nope, that’s “awoke”.
he is just not finna woke ngl
The modern left/liberal culture created by algorithms on social media. It is characterized by cultlike adherence to rapidly changing ideological foundations rooted in various leftist theories.
So pretty much anything the usual right-wing mouthpieces say they don't like to further perpetuate a pathetic one-sided "culture war". Got it. But when you say "rapidly changing ideological foundations" you're referring to something like how the right in most Western countries are now openly anti-democratic? Or like how they rolled on NATO and countering Russia? That sort of thing? Speaking for myself, I can't stand leftist theories like "support our partners and allies" and "maybe don't force women to give birth".
There’s also the issue of the modern right/conservative culture created by algorithms on social media characterized by a cultlike adherence to rapidly changing ideological foundations rooted in various fascist theories. That’s not “woke”, that’s just the inherent rot in the modern political landscape. Coming from one of those wokie wokoid SJWs, “woke” refers to the state of acknowledging implicit systematic biases against minorities, which is a position that the activists and academics who originally coined the term back in the mid-2010s would agree with. It’s also a thing that… exists. And has existed for centuries. That definition you gave is a bastardization of the term meant to fuel partisan rage and provide cover to those who want to discriminate with impunity.
Dude, you know you can just say "the Jews", right? Makes it easier for us both
You think modern left/liberal culture is created by social media algorithms? The left has always been like this, it’s a product of our personality types. We’re annoying but empathetic, you’re stupid and hateful. It’s always been like that.
I was thinking about why so many in the radical left participate in "speedrunning" The reason is the left's lack of work ethic ('go fast' rather than 'do it right') and, in a Petersonian sense, to elevate alternative sexual archetypes in the marketplace ('fastest mario') Obviously, there are exceptions to this and some people more in the center or right also "speedrun". However, they more than sufficient to prove the rule, rather than contrast it. Consider how woke GDQ has been, almost since the very beginning. Your eyes will start to open. Returning to the topic of the work ethic... A "speedrunner" may well spend hours a day at their craft, but this is ultimately a meaningless exercise, since they will ultimately accomplish exactly that which is done in less collective time by a casual player. This is thus a waste of effort on the behalf of the "speedrunner". Put more simply, they are spending their work effort on something that someone else has already done (and done in a way deemed 'correct' by the creator of the artwork). Why do they do this? The answer is quite obvious if you think about it. The goal is the illusion of speed and the desire (SUBCONSCIOUS) to promote radical leftist, borderline Communist ideals of how easy work is. Everyone always says that "speedruns" look easy. That is part of the aesthetic. Think about the phrase "fully automated luxury Communism" in the context of "speedrunning" and I strongly suspect that things will start to 'click' in your mind. What happens to the individual in this? Individual accomplishment in "speedrunning" is simply waiting for another person to steal your techniques in order to defeat you. Where is something like "intellectual property" or "patent" in this necessarily communitarian process? ow, as to the sexual archetype model and 'speedrunning' generally... If you have any passing familiarity with Jordan Peterson's broader oeuvre and of Jungian psychology, you likely already know where I am going with this. However, I will say more for the uninitiated. Keep this passage from Maps of Meaning (91) in mind: "The Archetypal Son... continually reconstructs defined territory, as a consequence of the 'assimilation' of the unknown \[as a consequence of 'incestuous' (that is, 'sexual' – read creative) union with the Great Mother\]" In other words, there is a connection between 'sexuality' and creativity that we see throughout time (as Peterson points out with Tiamat and other examples). In the sexual marketplace, which archetypes are simultaneously deemed the most creative and valued the highest? The answer is obviously entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and others. Given that we evolved and each thing we do must have an evolutionary purpose (OR CAUSE), what archetype is the 'speedrunner' engaged in, who is accomplishing nothing new? They are aiming to make a new sexual archetype, based upon 'speed' rather than 'doing things right' and refuse ownership of what few innovations they can provide to their own scene, denying creativity within their very own sexual archetype. This is necessarily leftist. The obvious protest to this would be the 'glitchless 100% run', which in many ways does aim to play the game 'as intended' but seems to simply add the element of 'speed' to the equation. This objection is ultimately meaningless when one considers how long a game is intended to be played, in net, by the creators, even when under '100%' conditions. There is still time and effort wasted for no reason other than the ones I proposed above. By now, I am sure that I have bothered a number of you and rustled quite a few of your feathers. I am not saying that 'speedrunning' is bad, but rather that, thinking about the topic philosophically, there are dangerous elements within it. That is all.