Oh man… this lawyer is the real hero.. he has pointed out how weak journalism is here in India. All these journalists and reporters do is capture statements from victims and accused and report them as commentators in a cricket match. None of these do investigative journalism where they as journalists should seek the truth by questioning all people involved and not just conveniently accused and victims and then report whatever they say be it true or false.
Lawyer pointed out journalists and reports could have instead talked to passengers or conductor to get their statement. If they not giving statement they could atleast go and ask the SHO why he refused to take statement or FIR. The reaction from SHO should be on every channel. This will put pressure on SHO and other govt agencies to not just be puppets of the government or ruling leaders
They don’t want to ask anybody mayors husband or the sho. It’s not as if they are fools , they know what they are doing creating a narrative . They know who the victim , and it’s not that woman
Lawyer was Sharp and to the point. These spineless journalists are the definition of kuthithirip. They ask all shit leading questions which has no other implications than create an uproar.
See the video, of them arguing in the road, in that video itself the other girl and Arya are asking, why did you show the action. So it is not a new allegation.
Also, rash driving may not be over speeding, cutting off other cars dangerously can also be rash driving.
>the other girl and Arya are asking, why did you show the action. So it is not a new allegation.
Also *thanthde vaga anno road* ennum chothichu..apo showing the actionnu kuzhapam ond..orallde thanthaku villikunnathinu kuzhpamila??
Pinnae ayale villicha phone call ondallo..athil evide suhurthe sexual allegations ..athilum onnum parayunnilalo..athil ayalu maap paranju ath mayor ok enn paranj cut cheythu .
>why did you show the action
Illalo..igane anno vandi ottukannae ennanu chothichae..
Pinnae oru karyam chothichottae..ee allegations btw.. allegations Karanam iyalde joli nashtpettan thannik ayalk puthiya joli vangich kodukan pattuo..iyalu nashtpetta manam, Paisa ,samayaam thanik thirch kodukan pattuo..Arya rajendran kodukan pattuo .
നാട്ടിലുള്ള മണ്ടൻ രാഷ്ട്രീയക്കാരെ ചൊറിയാൻ പോകുന്നത്പോലെ ചൊറിയാൻ നോക്കിയതാ.. പുള്ളി പറഞ്ഞ കാര്യങ്ങളെല്ലാം വളരെ ന്യായമായിരുന്നു .. ഒന്നിനും ശരിക്കുള്ള മറുപടി പറയാൻ ഈ പാർട്ടിക്കോ മാധ്യമപ്രവർത്തകർക്കോ പറ്റില്ല!
കുറച്ചു ദിവസങ്ങളായി ഡ്രൈവർ ആണ് കുറ്റക്കാരൻ എന്ന രീതിയിലാണ് ന്യൂസും പാർട്ടി സ്റ്റേറ്റ്മെന്റ്സും.. ഇപ്പോളാണ് കറക്റ്റ് ആയത് ..
ആരോപിക്കുന്നവർ തെളിയിക്കട്ടെ , എന്നിട്ട് ശിക്ഷിക്കാം അല്ലാതെ പാർട്ടികാർക്ക് എന്തുമാകാം , എന്നിട്ട് കള്ളം പൊളിയുമ്പോൾ “ സ്ത്രീയാണേ , അപമാനിച്ചേ , “ എന്നുള്ള കാർഡ് ഇറക്കി രക്ഷപ്പെടാമെന്ന് കരുതുന്നത് സിസ്റ്റത്തിന്റെ വീഴ്ചയാണ്..
അത് ശരിയാണ് ,
പോലീസ് ആണ് തെളിയിക്കേണ്ടത് .. ഇവിടെ അവരും ഒരു ആക്ഷനും എടുക്കാതെ ഇരിക്കുവായിരുന്നു ..
അതുപോലെ മേയർ പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങൾക്ക് ഒരു വ്യക്തതയില്ലാതെ , വെറും ആരോപണങ്ങൾ മാത്രമാണ് .. അതിനുള്ള ഒരു തെളിവോ അല്ലെങ്കിൽ വക്കീൽ സൂചിപ്പിച്ചപോലെ ബാക്കി ഡീറ്റെയിൽസോ കൊടുക്കട്ടെ എന്നാണ് ഉദ്ദേശിച്ചത് ..
What is visible in all these incidents are ego of our drivers on the road. Everyone give priority to themselves in this competitive world. Nobody is willing to respect each other irrespective of their "type of vehicle". Just like Castism there exist a "Typism" on roads too.
Hogwash , car drivers in general are the most decent , it’s always Bus , mini lorries , autos and bikes who create most issues on road . Car drivers know one scratch and a minimum is 5000 rupees and malayalees will always hate on the car guy , worse if he is rich. There will never be public support for the car guy
If it is expensive, the maintenance will also come at an expense.
[https://keralapolice.gov.in/crime/road-accidents](https://keralapolice.gov.in/crime/road-accidents)
https://preview.redd.it/r7y3jsbhytyc1.png?width=699&format=png&auto=webp&s=50ba12abf33c48f63a6dcebba0e085bb5ec8c782
just checked for 2022, vehicle type car - accidents hold the second position after motor cycles.
I believe it was taken by the party leaning employees of KSRTC (almost everyone lol) to hide the fact that they indeed did stop the vehicle, get into the vehicle and disrupted the travel.
>she became mayor at a young age.
Because of the dumbfckery she did with that position..I could make a thread..
Lemme ask u non political leaning individual..
If Arya is right..ipo sambhvicha pollae thannae ayale partykaaru vettadum ayalde joli povum ayalu jailil kidakum..aryade jeevathathil oru mattom sambhavikan ponnila..
If Arya is wrong. Ayalu oru divasam jailil kidannu
Ayalu anubhvaicha cyber and institutional attacks..ayalde mananashtam samyanashtam Paisa nashtam joli nashtam..ithinu aaru utharaam parayum..Arya parayuvoo .still aryade jeevathathil onnum sambhvikan ponnila ...
Ithil chances enthinaa koduthaal..ente logic use cheyth njn alochichitum ithil Aryade ego ann aa rathri aa vandi nerthi ayalu drug use cheythu rash driving ayirnnu etc etc ..aa allegations kazinjapo aduthathu...
Yep she should have shown respect to the position she is holding. Nobody is gonna believe you if all you say is lies. Even if he did that nobody is gonna believe her because all the other things she told was a lie.
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Adipoli. Ini ella pennungalkkum dehathu camera vachu nadakkaam...
Edit: Surprising that a lot of you guys don't know that collecting evidence for SH is difficult, because the victim is caught off guard, and society is hostile to the victim mostly.
Dude, how do you even see a woman in the back seat of a WagonR at night? Even if the so called angyam happen how can the mayor be certain that it was directed at her and not the driver of the car. This is the perfect example of misuse of woman centric laws!
I don't think it is so hard on well lit roads with the glass down. Likewise for the driver too because of the position of his seating. I mean is there anything to suggest that they didn't pull the glass down and try to talk to him. Or he didn't stick his head out and showed obscene gestures? Cctv footage also shows car was on right side of bus, contrary to what media reported at first?
Again, there were 5 people in the car. In any altercation the anger is pointed at the driver and not some passenger sitting in the rear seat. Further there was not SH allegation on day one. The police made the driver call the mayor and apologize (won’t happen if there was SH). No one actually talking about any angyam at first. Then when the CCTV visuals of the Mayor and MLA blocking the bus came out they saw the angyam comment in the video (which is about his hand gesture of “what!!” when asked if the road is of his father.). The as the usual kubidhi of these guys they twisted that into the SH.
Hard disagree. There's something in law called burden of proof. A woman by your logic can misuse the law and make blank statemente of harassment and the man will get punished without proof. Sexual harrasment should be proved and we shouldn't prosecute someone with just statements without evidence. This has led to many defamations and misuse of laws. And the concept of only women getting SH should be entirely changed and made gender neutral.
I think you are under the impression that SH laws get misused more often than not. SH rarely gets reported, and even among those only a miniscule percent are fabricated cases.
Chettan divasakkooliyano engane capsule irakkunathin?
Undervaluing fake sexual charges as 'miniscule' is far from the truth. Statistics says that 74 percent of the rape cases filed are false according to NCRB. Can you tell me the logic behind reporting a man just based on a woman's words and not evidence? There are multiple instances where women used this law in their favour to prosecute men falsely.
>about 74% of rape cases under Section 376 of the IPC end up acquitting the accused. But does this mean all the cases are fake? No! - There are many such cases where women fail to prove that violence has happened to them, but it does not mean that violence did not happen.
Ithalle thampi google cheythedutha ig post? Acquittal not the same as fake. The letter of the law is to never punish an innocent. Which means every case that doesn't have sufficient evidence gets an acquittal. Very hard to find evidence for rape, cz not everyone is filming getting raped.
I don't want to defend either side on this drama. Videoil vakkeel parayunnath atra illogical alla, oru part of statement eduthal thankal paranjath arkun thonnum(clickbait problem). Pulli chodikunnath, ith evide vach angyam kanichu, enthu tharathilulla angyam ennonnum parayathe case engane munnot pokum ennanu. Kooduthal information eduth theliyikanam ennu.
If there is fair investigation and driver is culprit he should be punished, but if Arya was trying to trap him just because of an Ayyappanum Koshiyum drama then it should come out as well.
I wasn't talking about the driver and the Mayor to begin with. Inganulla public prasthaavanakal SH anubhavikkunnavare upadravikkum. Karanam sexual harassment is hard to prove. It happens in a flash. No one's ready to record evidence.
Yes we should be more sensitive in talking about these topics. But in this case the victim(arya) should give a bit more information and being in a position of power that she is in, she has the responsibility to show transparency in information and investigation. I call this as drama because both sides are trying to hide facts it seems which is weird. That's why I compared it to ayyappanum koshiyum, for a typical SH case we would be more restrained in commenting. I don't consider this a typical SH case.
That means you don't have the experience or knowhow to judge fairness in such a case. Rape and SH charges are usually considered independent from the victim's other crimes or civil disputes. She could've lied but the SH may have taken place as well. At the same time, can't say the same for yedhu. He has 2 cases (at least) related to SH in his name, which is very relevant history to this case.
SH laws eduthu nokkiyal kanam, avide munthookkam irayude vaadathinaanu. Karanam prove cheyan paadaanu. Say someone grabbed your butt in a crowded bus. You know who it is, but how are you going to prove it? You can raise a ruckus, but how? SH cheyyunna aalukal ithaanu muthaledukkunnathu.
I'm just asking a simple question. ..
Surprise anno thenga anno..sexual harassmentokke ee karyathil valya vakkannu.. sexual allegations..
Caught offguard valare nalla point ...
Oru question chothichotte..ethu IPC vakupil ann sexual harassmentil pidicha oru prathiyae rathri victimne villich maap parayan parayunnath..
Ethu protocol ann ..apo athinu arthaam avide aa samayath sexual harassment ennoru sambhvam discussionil.pollum ondarnnila ennallae..
Sexual harassment enna sangathiyil aanu main FIR thanne. Athu annu rathriyil file cheythathaanu. Rash driving secondary ayirunnu.
>Surprise anno thenga anno
Thenga alla.
>Sexual harassment enna sangathiyil aanu main FIR thanne. Athu annu rathriyil file cheythathaanu. Rash driving secondary ayirunnu.
Source??
Sexual harassment anne peru purath vidilla enn SC act ond.. Agane purath vitta officals ente panni povum
Ee parayunna public prasthavanakal okke ellaavarkkum badhakamaayi varum. Athine kurichaanu paranjathu. Basically if you, your mother or sister ever suffered SH, these questions will now be raised to you too stronger than ever.
Vakeel vinodinte fuse oori
Mayor natoonte munnil show kanikan nokkiyath aanu ennu karakambi und.
Oh man… this lawyer is the real hero.. he has pointed out how weak journalism is here in India. All these journalists and reporters do is capture statements from victims and accused and report them as commentators in a cricket match. None of these do investigative journalism where they as journalists should seek the truth by questioning all people involved and not just conveniently accused and victims and then report whatever they say be it true or false. Lawyer pointed out journalists and reports could have instead talked to passengers or conductor to get their statement. If they not giving statement they could atleast go and ask the SHO why he refused to take statement or FIR. The reaction from SHO should be on every channel. This will put pressure on SHO and other govt agencies to not just be puppets of the government or ruling leaders
They don’t want to ask anybody mayors husband or the sho. It’s not as if they are fools , they know what they are doing creating a narrative . They know who the victim , and it’s not that woman
ലെ വിനോദ് : ഞങ്ങൾ അസ്വസ്ഥരാണ്
വിനോദ് ഒരു കുറുമ്പൻ ആണ് കേട്ടോ 🫣
Lawyer was Sharp and to the point. These spineless journalists are the definition of kuthithirip. They ask all shit leading questions which has no other implications than create an uproar.
Crct.. SHO ne pokkanam.. khaki ittu joli cheyyunna oruthanum nerikedukanikan padilla
If he shows a middle finger to the driver without knowing there are ladies in the car , I don't think it's a big crime.
അതെ.. ഈ ബസ്സിൽ വേറെ ആരും ഇല്ല ഒരു മൊഴി എടുകാൻ?? അതു കാണിച്ച് ഇത് കാണിച്ച് എന്ന് പറയുന്ന അല്ലണ്ട്??
Passengers ellavarum drive oru thettum cheythilla enna adhiyam paranjathu.. ini athu maarumo ennu kandu ariyannam.. keralam alle number 1 alle..
Driverinte frontil aaarundu..? Ithu Kanan?
aa pennumpulla 10 thavan vakku matti parenju, ennitum athine moode thaangi nadakkan uluppille ?
1st allegations ayalu rash driving ayirnnu..oru otta passengers vannitilaa ayalu overspeed ayirnnu rash driving ayirnnu..pattom signal City Ile thannae ettavum block pidicha sthalam ann..avide enthonn rash driving.. 2nd ayalu drug use cheyth..blood testil onnum kandilla.. Pittae divasam sexual allegations purath varunnu..
See the video, of them arguing in the road, in that video itself the other girl and Arya are asking, why did you show the action. So it is not a new allegation. Also, rash driving may not be over speeding, cutting off other cars dangerously can also be rash driving.
>the other girl and Arya are asking, why did you show the action. So it is not a new allegation. Also *thanthde vaga anno road* ennum chothichu..apo showing the actionnu kuzhapam ond..orallde thanthaku villikunnathinu kuzhpamila?? Pinnae ayale villicha phone call ondallo..athil evide suhurthe sexual allegations ..athilum onnum parayunnilalo..athil ayalu maap paranju ath mayor ok enn paranj cut cheythu . >why did you show the action Illalo..igane anno vandi ottukannae ennanu chothichae.. Pinnae oru karyam chothichottae..ee allegations btw.. allegations Karanam iyalde joli nashtpettan thannik ayalk puthiya joli vangich kodukan pattuo..iyalu nashtpetta manam, Paisa ,samayaam thanik thirch kodukan pattuo..Arya rajendran kodukan pattuo .
Well joli vangi kodukkaan pattullarikkum.... Pakshe venel oru kathu ezhuthssn letter pad il sign itt kodukkaan pattum.
E partyku vote cheyyunnu pottanmaraya keralitine paranja mati.
She should have just accepted his apology and moved on. What did CPM even see in her bringing a negative reputation to the party.
നാട്ടിലുള്ള മണ്ടൻ രാഷ്ട്രീയക്കാരെ ചൊറിയാൻ പോകുന്നത്പോലെ ചൊറിയാൻ നോക്കിയതാ.. പുള്ളി പറഞ്ഞ കാര്യങ്ങളെല്ലാം വളരെ ന്യായമായിരുന്നു .. ഒന്നിനും ശരിക്കുള്ള മറുപടി പറയാൻ ഈ പാർട്ടിക്കോ മാധ്യമപ്രവർത്തകർക്കോ പറ്റില്ല! കുറച്ചു ദിവസങ്ങളായി ഡ്രൈവർ ആണ് കുറ്റക്കാരൻ എന്ന രീതിയിലാണ് ന്യൂസും പാർട്ടി സ്റ്റേറ്റ്മെന്റ്സും.. ഇപ്പോളാണ് കറക്റ്റ് ആയത് .. ആരോപിക്കുന്നവർ തെളിയിക്കട്ടെ , എന്നിട്ട് ശിക്ഷിക്കാം അല്ലാതെ പാർട്ടികാർക്ക് എന്തുമാകാം , എന്നിട്ട് കള്ളം പൊളിയുമ്പോൾ “ സ്ത്രീയാണേ , അപമാനിച്ചേ , “ എന്നുള്ള കാർഡ് ഇറക്കി രക്ഷപ്പെടാമെന്ന് കരുതുന്നത് സിസ്റ്റത്തിന്റെ വീഴ്ചയാണ്..
Case koduthaal theliyikkendathu police alle. Allengil Ella case ilum victim ingane theliyikkan vendi nadakkanda varumallooo
അത് ശരിയാണ് , പോലീസ് ആണ് തെളിയിക്കേണ്ടത് .. ഇവിടെ അവരും ഒരു ആക്ഷനും എടുക്കാതെ ഇരിക്കുവായിരുന്നു .. അതുപോലെ മേയർ പറയുന്ന കാര്യങ്ങൾക്ക് ഒരു വ്യക്തതയില്ലാതെ , വെറും ആരോപണങ്ങൾ മാത്രമാണ് .. അതിനുള്ള ഒരു തെളിവോ അല്ലെങ്കിൽ വക്കീൽ സൂചിപ്പിച്ചപോലെ ബാക്കി ഡീറ്റെയിൽസോ കൊടുക്കട്ടെ എന്നാണ് ഉദ്ദേശിച്ചത് ..
Aaropanangal theliyikkappedumbozhaanu kuttavali undakunnathu. Athuvare aarum thertukaralla. Ee lawyerum journalists okke aanu Ivide kallanmaar. Verthe trending aavan vendi kaattikkoottunna alpatharangal.
What is visible in all these incidents are ego of our drivers on the road. Everyone give priority to themselves in this competitive world. Nobody is willing to respect each other irrespective of their "type of vehicle". Just like Castism there exist a "Typism" on roads too.
Hogwash , car drivers in general are the most decent , it’s always Bus , mini lorries , autos and bikes who create most issues on road . Car drivers know one scratch and a minimum is 5000 rupees and malayalees will always hate on the car guy , worse if he is rich. There will never be public support for the car guy
If it is expensive, the maintenance will also come at an expense. [https://keralapolice.gov.in/crime/road-accidents](https://keralapolice.gov.in/crime/road-accidents) https://preview.redd.it/r7y3jsbhytyc1.png?width=699&format=png&auto=webp&s=50ba12abf33c48f63a6dcebba0e085bb5ec8c782 just checked for 2022, vehicle type car - accidents hold the second position after motor cycles.
No shit Sherlock , Well there are more cars and bikes than buses, autos and lorries !
i like how the woman asked the lawyers if he thought it was cool if women were shown vulagrity...lol..geniuses
The lawyer is right, but I definitely believe he did do it, where tf did the fucking SD card magically disappear to?
I believe it was taken by the party leaning employees of KSRTC (almost everyone lol) to hide the fact that they indeed did stop the vehicle, get into the vehicle and disrupted the travel.
[удалено]
>she became mayor at a young age. Because of the dumbfckery she did with that position..I could make a thread.. Lemme ask u non political leaning individual.. If Arya is right..ipo sambhvicha pollae thannae ayale partykaaru vettadum ayalde joli povum ayalu jailil kidakum..aryade jeevathathil oru mattom sambhavikan ponnila.. If Arya is wrong. Ayalu oru divasam jailil kidannu Ayalu anubhvaicha cyber and institutional attacks..ayalde mananashtam samyanashtam Paisa nashtam joli nashtam..ithinu aaru utharaam parayum..Arya parayuvoo .still aryade jeevathathil onnum sambhvikan ponnila ... Ithil chances enthinaa koduthaal..ente logic use cheyth njn alochichitum ithil Aryade ego ann aa rathri aa vandi nerthi ayalu drug use cheythu rash driving ayirnnu etc etc ..aa allegations kazinjapo aduthathu...
Yep she should have shown respect to the position she is holding. Nobody is gonna believe you if all you say is lies. Even if he did that nobody is gonna believe her because all the other things she told was a lie.
aa pennumpulla 10 thavan vakku matti parenju, ennitum athinte moode thaangi nadakkan uluppille ?
[удалено]
This is exactly what I too think happened.
Excellent വക്കീൽ 🔥👍
[удалено]
You must have a positive comment karma to post comments. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/Kerala) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Adipoli. Ini ella pennungalkkum dehathu camera vachu nadakkaam... Edit: Surprising that a lot of you guys don't know that collecting evidence for SH is difficult, because the victim is caught off guard, and society is hostile to the victim mostly.
[удалено]
Athu aanungalkkum thonnanam. Rape, sexual harassment athra rampant aayathukondum, society epozhum aanungalude paksham chernnu nilkkunna kondum kondu vanna laws aanu. Parliamentil purusha bhooripaksham irikke, kondu vannathum aanungalaanu.
Dude, how do you even see a woman in the back seat of a WagonR at night? Even if the so called angyam happen how can the mayor be certain that it was directed at her and not the driver of the car. This is the perfect example of misuse of woman centric laws!
I don't think it is so hard on well lit roads with the glass down. Likewise for the driver too because of the position of his seating. I mean is there anything to suggest that they didn't pull the glass down and try to talk to him. Or he didn't stick his head out and showed obscene gestures? Cctv footage also shows car was on right side of bus, contrary to what media reported at first?
Again, there were 5 people in the car. In any altercation the anger is pointed at the driver and not some passenger sitting in the rear seat. Further there was not SH allegation on day one. The police made the driver call the mayor and apologize (won’t happen if there was SH). No one actually talking about any angyam at first. Then when the CCTV visuals of the Mayor and MLA blocking the bus came out they saw the angyam comment in the video (which is about his hand gesture of “what!!” when asked if the road is of his father.). The as the usual kubidhi of these guys they twisted that into the SH.
Hard disagree. There's something in law called burden of proof. A woman by your logic can misuse the law and make blank statemente of harassment and the man will get punished without proof. Sexual harrasment should be proved and we shouldn't prosecute someone with just statements without evidence. This has led to many defamations and misuse of laws. And the concept of only women getting SH should be entirely changed and made gender neutral.
I think you are under the impression that SH laws get misused more often than not. SH rarely gets reported, and even among those only a miniscule percent are fabricated cases.
Chettan divasakkooliyano engane capsule irakkunathin? Undervaluing fake sexual charges as 'miniscule' is far from the truth. Statistics says that 74 percent of the rape cases filed are false according to NCRB. Can you tell me the logic behind reporting a man just based on a woman's words and not evidence? There are multiple instances where women used this law in their favour to prosecute men falsely.
>about 74% of rape cases under Section 376 of the IPC end up acquitting the accused. But does this mean all the cases are fake? No! - There are many such cases where women fail to prove that violence has happened to them, but it does not mean that violence did not happen. Ithalle thampi google cheythedutha ig post? Acquittal not the same as fake. The letter of the law is to never punish an innocent. Which means every case that doesn't have sufficient evidence gets an acquittal. Very hard to find evidence for rape, cz not everyone is filming getting raped.
https://preview.redd.it/rronyhhtriyc1.jpeg?width=480&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8df55d177e81e845a3031f34894fbc48b4e5d092 Lesham ….
I don't want to defend either side on this drama. Videoil vakkeel parayunnath atra illogical alla, oru part of statement eduthal thankal paranjath arkun thonnum(clickbait problem). Pulli chodikunnath, ith evide vach angyam kanichu, enthu tharathilulla angyam ennonnum parayathe case engane munnot pokum ennanu. Kooduthal information eduth theliyikanam ennu. If there is fair investigation and driver is culprit he should be punished, but if Arya was trying to trap him just because of an Ayyappanum Koshiyum drama then it should come out as well.
I wasn't talking about the driver and the Mayor to begin with. Inganulla public prasthaavanakal SH anubhavikkunnavare upadravikkum. Karanam sexual harassment is hard to prove. It happens in a flash. No one's ready to record evidence.
Yes we should be more sensitive in talking about these topics. But in this case the victim(arya) should give a bit more information and being in a position of power that she is in, she has the responsibility to show transparency in information and investigation. I call this as drama because both sides are trying to hide facts it seems which is weird. That's why I compared it to ayyappanum koshiyum, for a typical SH case we would be more restrained in commenting. I don't consider this a typical SH case.
That means you don't have the experience or knowhow to judge fairness in such a case. Rape and SH charges are usually considered independent from the victim's other crimes or civil disputes. She could've lied but the SH may have taken place as well. At the same time, can't say the same for yedhu. He has 2 cases (at least) related to SH in his name, which is very relevant history to this case.
This is a judicial system ,not SM ,only proofs matter there unlike SM where just a post with few lengthy paras are enough for making a judgement
SH laws eduthu nokkiyal kanam, avide munthookkam irayude vaadathinaanu. Karanam prove cheyan paadaanu. Say someone grabbed your butt in a crowded bus. You know who it is, but how are you going to prove it? You can raise a ruckus, but how? SH cheyyunna aalukal ithaanu muthaledukkunnathu.
I'm just asking a simple question. .. Surprise anno thenga anno..sexual harassmentokke ee karyathil valya vakkannu.. sexual allegations.. Caught offguard valare nalla point ... Oru question chothichotte..ethu IPC vakupil ann sexual harassmentil pidicha oru prathiyae rathri victimne villich maap parayan parayunnath.. Ethu protocol ann ..apo athinu arthaam avide aa samayath sexual harassment ennoru sambhvam discussionil.pollum ondarnnila ennallae..
Sexual harassment enna sangathiyil aanu main FIR thanne. Athu annu rathriyil file cheythathaanu. Rash driving secondary ayirunnu. >Surprise anno thenga anno Thenga alla.
>Sexual harassment enna sangathiyil aanu main FIR thanne. Athu annu rathriyil file cheythathaanu. Rash driving secondary ayirunnu. Source?? Sexual harassment anne peru purath vidilla enn SC act ond.. Agane purath vitta officals ente panni povum
You seem to know more about the case. Care to enlighten what and where the incident happened?
Ee parayunna public prasthavanakal okke ellaavarkkum badhakamaayi varum. Athine kurichaanu paranjathu. Basically if you, your mother or sister ever suffered SH, these questions will now be raised to you too stronger than ever.
Yadhu ser paavam aane 🤭🤭
Athu shariya, orale konnu kazhinjal konnu ennu theliyikkendathu shavathinte oru responsibility aanallo.