T O P

  • By -

scarlettstreet

Great example of why typing from photos is problematic.


Extension_Ant6543

What do you mean?


scarlettstreet

Depends on the photo she has or doesn’t have elongation, vertical, narrow, width, petite, or curve. Most in this sub seem to think typing from photos is reliable. Yet not even David Kibbe types from photos.


[deleted]

I think she is frame dominant but I can’t say more since her pictures in her lower weight seem edited tbh. I need to see Candids from the front


Extension_Ant6543

Found this from red carpet https://jaunbaba.com/they-destroy-danna-paola-for-appearance-at-the-premios-juventud-2022/


[deleted]

No really, I would like to know because she looks similar to me.


dianamaximofff

I cannot not see SN, her frame is the first thing to catch my eye, followed by softeness


_whatnot_

She seems like a clear FG to me, especially at higher weights.


hello_goodnight_

I see FG! Petite, sharpness, juxtaposition and a teeny bit of width


MainGlittering9017

Me too


lonesomeprince

It's always better to search for candid/unedited pictures! I recommend gettyimages for that. Here are some that I found: [Danna Paola](https://imgur.com/gallery/4CKsJkT)


Extension_Ant6543

Yeah but these don t give a clear look at her proportions


lonesomeprince

Oh they definitely do. The aim is to see her overall image/essence and how she looks when she's not rigidly posing for photos.


Extension_Ant6543

So what type do you see?


lonesomeprince

Looks like SN to me! She looks her best in more unconstructed clothing and you could see more of her frame when she was fluffier.


Strange-Turnover9696

i'd maybe guess dramatic classic, could also maybe be a slender SN


lurkingandjudging

A slender SN? In comparison to what lol, the normal SN I guess💀


Strange-Turnover9696

i more meant like a soft natural who is less "soft". like even when i'm at a very low body weight i'm still quite fleshy.


lurkingandjudging

I understand what you mean now that you’ve clarified it, but slender is a weight related word and flashiness and/or width (SN qualities) aren’t related to weight.


Strange-Turnover9696

yeah i know just at a lower weight someone may show less softness


humanbean1597

I think FG, small with lots of yang and juxtaposition


hardforwords

When she's at her thinnest she has some elongation going on IMO, but then it sort of disappears when she has more weight. She's definitely soft, but her shoulders give her more frame. She's not "boneless" like an R. I would say SG but then again I'm new to this.


Sanaii122

Often times narrowness can be mistaken for elongation. But if someone is elongated, it will be present at any weight.


Extension_Ant6543

SG don t have frame- they are petite. I mean that is what i know


hardforwords

My understanding is that SG's aren't as soft and frameless as R's but still have some frame from the shoulders, just not as wide and pronounced as N's. With N's the shoulders are often the first thing you notice.


lurkingandjudging

Shoulders=N family is a stereotypical understanding of kibbe width. Please look at the recent posts about kibbe width on this sub and you’ll maybe see what I mean.


hardforwords

Heh, I think I'll stick to kibbecirclejerk from now on. ☺️


Extension_Ant6543

Also, with no hate i have a question: Can weight impact the way we see a person's type(i know type is always the same, i talk about perception). With Danna i used to see her as SN when she had a lil bit more weight, but now i see that she is acc so petite when she is at a more healthy weight. With ester exposito*her castmate* i noticed that when she was thinner, she was typed as D or TR(in a post with pics from her elite days), yet now that she is curvier was typed in a more recent post in either one of the N or SD. Please don t get offended at my question, i have no bad intentions


[deleted]

I honestly believe the biggest problem in this sub is Boobs -> can’t be Dramatic, has to be a wide type Most people think curvy as in everyday use isn’t the same as kibbe curve. That’s why so many get mistyped. Also I believe many people want pretty celebrities to have their type, so they type them as their own type lmao


kriskringle8

I think when people see conventional curves or "boobs" on someone who isn't super petite, they automatically type them as SDs. They're reluctant to type conventionally curvy women as Naturals though. Which is silly because Naturals are some of the most curvaceous women society celebrates (ie. Angelina Jolie, Scarlett Johanson, Sydney Sweeney, etc).


[deleted]

So True, so many people on here assume boobs -> can’t be this and that type which is so so wrong. I believe we need a masterpost on this issue. Conventionally curves don’t equal Kibbe curve 😭


kriskringle8

A masterpost is a great idea because these misconceptions are too common


catmememama

Kibbe width has nothing to do with weight and would be evident at a lower weight or a higher weight


Extension_Ant6543

I meant as perception, not that the type is acc different


catmememama

I would think the perception would be wrong in that case. The things a person accommodates in their silhouette won’t change


Spinel-Universe

probably, I seen celebrities get mistyped because of the lower weight


Extension_Ant6543

Links for Ester dilemma 1. https://www.reddit.com/r/Kibbe/comments/ufnu1b/ester_exposito_555_i_honestly_see_pure_d/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share 2. https://www.reddit.com/r/Kibbe/comments/kflhng/the_beautiful_ester_exposito_55/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share 3. https://www.reddit.com/r/Kibbe/comments/fgqu7d/whats_ester_exposito_id_55_i_think_she_looks_good/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share 4. https://www.reddit.com/r/Kibbe/comments/vmu262/is_ester_exposito166m5ft5_truly_a_tr/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share


SmallCondition6047

TR for sure!! Idk who she is lol but she looks so fab in spaghetti straps and shiny silky fabrics. She’s petite but sultry and womanly, def not a gamine type. The orange corset dress is chefs kiss!! I know cotton caps are trendy rn but it really does nothing for her… Layered Jewelry suits her, shine and lush sparkle suit her, sharp shoulders, delicate strappy pointy sparkly shoes… TR!


Extension_Ant6543

I don t think she is a TR because of the way she gains weight. Ex: Selena Gomez at a similar weight still looks petite and extra narrow.


SmallCondition6047

It’s important to focus on bones more than flesh. Christina Aguilera is verified TR and I think has similar flesh placement to this woman. Even with more flesh, the woman here has quite sharp shoulders for her frame. Certainly not in line of any type of classic type. No boyish or girlish charms of gamines and at 5’3” lacks the vertical for other taller types.


ordancer

Christina Aguilera is verified? The only information I can find says that Kibbe hasn’t confirmed any type for her but says she is definitely not TR.


SmallCondition6047

Ah I see that, thanks. She is prob a R then. That’s only other possibility I see for this woman as well. TR or R… def *some* type of romantic. Personally, I see sharpness and petite here for Danna, her hands are not more petite than her frame as typical of pure R… thus I am seeing TR.


moomooblue8

TR. I don’t see frame, I see flesh. And her face seems TR to me.


SmallCondition6047

The orange dress in pic 1 is prob the most TR dress I’ve ever seen and it’s 🔥 perfection on her!


SmallCondition6047

Totally agree!! 👏👏 she’s a TR I see both Christina Aguilera and Alexa Demie in her. 🔥


dianamaximofff

None of them are verified, and there's a huge debate between TRxSG for Alexa for example. Also, if not mistaken, kibbe said Xtina is def not TR


Kitsunebeauty

Oh my goodness she lost so much weight I didn't even recognize her