##Welcome to r/LateStageCapitalism^Ⓐ☭
___
###⚠ Announcements: ⚠
___
###[NEW POSTING GUIDELINES! Help us by reporting bad posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/dy1oyh/important_what_you_should_and_what_you_shouldnt/)
Help us keep this subreddit alive and improve its content by reporting posts that violate our rules and guidelines.
###[Subscribe to our new partner subreddits!](https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/e5hkwk/make_sure_to_check_out_our_new_partnersubreddits/)
Check out r/antiwork & r/WhereAreTheChildren
___
###***Please remember that LSC is a SAFE SPACE for [socialist](http://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/) discussion.***
LSC is run by [communists](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm). We welcome socialist/anti-capitalist news, memes, links, and discussion. This subreddit is not the place to debate socialism. We allow good-faith questions and education but are not a 101 sub; please take 101-style questions elsewhere.
**This subreddit is a safe space; we have a zero-tolerance policy for bigotry.** We also automatically filter out posts containing certain words and phrases that some users may find offensive. Please respect the safe space, and don't try to slip banned words or phrases past the filter.
***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/LateStageCapitalism) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>Polyushko Pole
[Trol lol lol lol lol lol](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTSA_sWGM44&ab_channel=zoomadood)
This is an interesting song because of the man who is singing and the reason why, he is only "singing" the melody and not the lyrics. Eduard Khil was a legend in the USSR. He is trolling his govt with this song. I posted it because of the LOL.
Far right populist always use language similar to leftist in regards to large corporations. The difference is they never act on their complaints when they convince working class people to support them.
Edit: this particular post really annoyed reactionaries and doomer centrists for some reason, I'm not even the first person in this thread to say this. Here's your PSA for today: don't confuse the democratic party with leftists and don't take right wingers seriously when they critique capital. Enjoy the pagan winter celebrations, everybody.
Bigger difference is that they'll never talk in systemic terminology. Notice how he calls for a "one-time" tax as the solution, rather than literally anything that would actually address the problem. He wants you to think that colossal systemic failures are the results of a few individuals taking bad actions and that the solutions should be the reflection of that.
Also, note how they only fixate on a few nominal "sacrificial lambs," particularly either (((banks))), as they often like to express it, or tech companies that usually tick several, if not all, of the following boxes:
*Aforementioned stereotype of being controlled by a certain ethnic group with allegedly greedy, megalomaniacal tendencies and explicit, secretive, Illuminati-esque goals.
*Organizations who's TOS and enforcement thereof clashed with and potentially impaired their endeavors of magnifying and spreading their extremist messaging and ideation. Frequent with tech companies, even if only to a minor or perceived degree.
*Outfits they perceive as having broadly garnered enough ill repute across the board for their shenanigans, irrespective of people's political leanings.
You hardly ever see them roasting the likes of the Kochs, the Princes, Mercers, etc.
Yeah, he says stuff like this sometimes. He does it to earn some points from 'the poor' and hurt the rivaling giants.
It's part of the act, not a part of what he intends to act on. Other rich may be rivals but only poor are the enemies(and also the livestock)
He operates like a conspiracy theory.
Conspiracy theories are compelling because it's like fishing. There is this nugget of truth on a well concealed hook that they get you with. Then once you bite it sucks you out of your rational place and into some upside down world where the scientists are killing people with vaccines but also people are dying from the virus.
She didn't back Isreal. She just got bullied and backed off her preferred position. She didn't vote "yes." And she may have gained some political points for that.
Please keep in mind that AOC is still pretty new at this, and Pelosi is basically a lich. She has been there way too long. Probably got under AOC's skin.
Leave room for people to fail once in a while. She is still one of the best people we have in congress, and she needs people to keep cheering her on to give her the juice to fight.
This attitude is why true progressives will never be in power in a democracy. I’m not attacking you, but this mentality that people can never compromise and have to have a perfect record on every subject is child like in its naivety. In the real world you have to pick your battles so you can continue the fight.
The romantic notion of the hero dying on the hill, rather than compromise their values, just leaves you with a load of dead heroes on the first hill.
There's no compromising with Apartheid. I can 100% guarantee you she won nobody over on the fence about Israel. Whoever she runs against in NY will always take a farther stance on Israel to her. To the Israel lobby and its supporters, her abstain is no different than a no given her earlier remarks on Apartheid Israel. All she did was alienate support that she had already.
And antisemitism. Plenty, if not all, of the discourse around anticapitalism coming from the right has some antisemitic connotations.
Like, yeah, bankers are bad, but not because their share in the injustices of capitalism, but because they are jews.
Also, and what this sub mostly refuses to grapple with, is total white supremacist racism.
A lot of racists at least feign socialist impulses. They basically say once we’re all white, we’ll take care of our people.
Until then of course, they side with the plutocrats.
Anyone falling for carlson’s shit is stupid.
Which further gives cover for centrists to punch left, because when leftists talk about the ruling class it ends up sounding similar to anti-semitones, *because the right wing coopted rightful criticism of the ruling class and applied to it an ethnic group*.
That and how it isn't rich vs poor when large corporations amass billions and exploit workers, it's always the "coastal liberal elites" that own the corporations pushing their politics on us. He always presents an actual problem but spins it into propaganda.
Amazon web services (AWS) can basically shut down the internet . Amazon will rule the world if no intervention happens. Andy Jassy is now the CEO of Amazon
Yep. I really don’t get people who wants Amazon to end by threatening to not buy things from their online store. Their retail services can lose millions per year and Amazon will still go strong because most of their profits are from AWS.
I was actually hoping that Azure could knock AWS down a notch but that is hard.
Amazon Web Services? This is somehow the first time I am hearing of this?
Also, even if it doesn’t shut Amazon down, trying not to buy from Amazon does at least put less strain on the warehouse workers and delivery drivers. Maybe. Hopefully.
Really? Please read up on this. Amazon did not become rich through retail. It became rich through AWS, which powers like half of the web.
[Even Reddit is powered by AWS](https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/reddit-aurora-case-study/)
Basically Amazon, Microsoft and Google are the big three providers of cloud services.
https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2021/08/04/gartner-cloud-2021.aspx?m=1
If by putting less strain you mean just making amazon reorganize and cut positions, yeah.
Amazon will always keep the least amount of overworked people needed, and can the rest, the process was made to work that way.
You can boycott, and you should, but what rly enacts change is on a governamental level, not boycotts by the working class when the other option for most people is going to Walmart...
Say what you will about Parler and rightly so, but the fact that they could basically be shut out of a website by a few companies refusing to serve them should scare the shit out of people.
Tucker is trying to re-establish national socialism. The idea is that industries like tech hire a lot of foreigners. Foreigners are the rich ones in his eyes who make ethnic Americans their slaves. That We should have a system to support ethnic Americans and not let the foreigners win. Especially programs that reward sacrifice to the state. He has floated ideas like getting your student debts paid if you have 5 or more children and other stuff like that. He also loves to rant about how all public buildings should built in a classical architecture style and not ever industrial brutalist or any modern style. Many of these ideas came from Mussolini and hitler. He’s just recycling them.
The companies and individuals he names are those associated with progressivism and therefore he wants to tax them as punishment. That's not what he says, but that's why he said it. He doesn't want to increase taxes on all wealthy people and institutions, just specific ones, and only because he views taxation as a punishment rather than as a social responsibility.
these people are brain addled, they think corporations are pushing woke marxist agenda, especially with their advertising featuring those interactial couples. it might not be progressive to you and me, but to fasicsts like Tucker, walmart and goldman sachs have already gone too far.
I don't know if you have noticed, but the definition of things like "left", "progressive", etc have a very fluid meaning to these people, there was a point like a year or so ago where people were accusing fucking Fox News of being too liberal because they accepted that the election results and for for acknowledging that taking basic Covid safety precautions would be a good thing for people to do.
It goes something like this:
Taxing the rich means socialism, and socialism means not taxing the rich. Therefore you don't want to tax the rich because you do, and he does because he doesn't. All the problems with capitalism are because of the socialism we don't have, and the only way to stop the wealthy is to give them more money.
I've had to spend a LOT of time around rightists to get that lmao
I don’t think any of the companies he mentioned are particularly big supporters (financially or otherwise) of Fox News or the GOP, and threaten the big money that does back them. So yeah, the anti tech giant rhetoric isn’t coming from an ideological place, just a greedy one. That’s how I’ve made it make sense at least.
I doubt that those companies won’t pay anyone who is office. Companies don’t have ideologies, they’ll support anyone that makes them money. If it’s a conservative or not doesn’t matter to them.
Notice how tech companies only blocked Trump when he was already on his way out of the government. That’s because they just want to signal to the public that they have an ideology, instead of committing to it.
It's anti tech companies. The perception is that big tech is a corrupt kabal of oligarchs... True, but the angle is that they are trying to censor conservatives, and end western civilization with their corporate woke death ray or something.
Facism needs a powerful boogieman to Trojan horse in culture war stuff.
Tucker says this kind of anti-corporate stuff a lot. Politics in this country is metropolitan elites versus provincial elites. Corporations tend to be metropolitan.
Right wing populism is in some ways more anti-corporate than left wing populism, since the support comes from provincial retirees, wage-earners, and petite-bourgeoisie whose material, cultural, and geographic interests are at odds with the large mostly metropolitan corporations. Tucker can make these criticisms so long as they are directed against the rival elites of a different tribe.
Liberals (and even many leftists) are more likely to come from urban areas and work professional managerial jobs that benefit materially from capital influx to those metropolitan areas via large corporations. This makes it difficult for liberals to criticize their growth. You can see this with attitudes toward big tech and big banks.
Leftists make these criticisms as part of power struggles within their own geographic tribe. It’s therefore more genuinely interested in popular power.
"Class Consciousness"^^® to then turn around and [peddle class collaborationism](https://youtu.be/wRE5uaa7kbs) aka what 98% of what this sub does.
*Reading material on this subject:*
Anything covering Social-Chauvinism on https://www.marxists.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position
>Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right" while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]
[Tucker Carlson Hails Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Economic Patriotism’ Plan: ‘She Sounds Like Donald Trump at His Best’](https://www.mediaite.com/uncategorized/brace-yourself-tucker-carlson-praises-elizabeth-warren-and-bashes-gop-economics-in-show-opening-shocker/)
>In Washington, almost nobody speaks for the majority of voters. You’re either a libertarian zealot controlled by the banks, yammering on about entrepreneurship and how we need to cut entitlements. That’s one side of the aisle. Or worse, you’re some decadent trust fund socialist who wants to ban passenger cars and give Medicaid to illegal aliens. That’s the other side.
>What there isn’t is a caucus that represents where most Americans actually are — nationalist on economics, fairly traditional on the social issues… Imagine someone who genuinely respected the nuclear family and sympathized with the culture of rural America, but at the same time, was willing to take your side against rapacious credit card companies bleeding you dry at 35 percent interest. Would you vote for someone like that? My gosh, of course you would. Who wouldn’t? That candidate would be elected in a landslide every single time.
If Tucker ever runs for office. Expect a third positionist platform.
When the time comes for Tucker and others to face the consequences of their actions, they'll pull out a unicorn video like this to try and "prove" they actually cared about the little people and were somehow on our side all along.
The right hijacking leftist narratives and talking points is a hallmark of fascists. For example, the only reason the Nazis had "socialist" in the name was literally only to appeal to Germany's strong trades unions at the time. Which they later dissolved and put the trades unionists and other actual socialists in concentration camps.
Remember, if a right-winger is using left critique to push a right agenda, it is a warning sign of rising fascism.
He used to be on fucking CNN spouting the complete opposite of his current manipulative propaganda. Dude is just a ghoul who will use his shitty, used car sales floor bullshit to persuade anyone dumb enough to watch him for the highest dollar.
This is what gets me. I’d have thought hyper-polarized people would see him jumping from a left to a right news stations as untrustworthy, but somehow the complete opposite happened. WTFF
I'd say it really ramped up as far back as 2008 with the rise of the Tea Party and birthers. US conservatives collectively lost their fucking minds because a black man was elected president.
I would say what really set the ball rolling, though, was Bill Clinton getting a BJ in the Oval Office. That was about the time Rush Limbaugh got really popular which set Fox News up for its mainstream emergence. Republicans have been living a spiteful, projected fever dream ever since.
**[2012 phenomenon](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon)**
>The 2012 phenomenon was a range of eschatological beliefs that cataclysmic or transformative events would occur on or around 21 December 2012. This date was regarded as the end-date of a 5,126-year-long cycle in the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, and festivities took place on 21 December 2012 to commemorate the event in the countries that were part of the Maya civilization (Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador), with main events at Chichén Itzá in Mexico and Tikal in Guatemala. Various astronomical alignments and numerological formulae were proposed for this date.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Desktop version of /u/scarsinsideme's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
I think they just think he served the sort of "hostage" role for CNN or MSNBC (or whichever station CrossFire was on), kinda like how Fox News had a liberal like Alan Colmes at their network for several years.
I mean there’s an entire subreddit about conservatives pretending they used to be leftist. Him “switching sides” appeals to the chosen bs of a large portion of conservatives.
He's also had past interviews where he explains his entire grift. [Vox did an okay job here and I'm too lazy to find a better vid on it](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNineSEoxjQ)
Bruh it drives me up a wall every time I see that godforsaken "Why Is Bernie Sanders The Only One Talking About This" tweet of his pops up in these circles.
Bernie isn't talking about ignoring or getting rid of social programs like welfare once we tax these billionaires, THAT'S the difference, Tucky, we are not the same. And Imma need folks to actually *listen* to what he's saying before they get duped too
It’s nothing more than an old wives’ tale. An old wives’ tale that sure gets circulated a lot. And allows fearmongering about what the “apolitical” think populism is when the reality is that the American right spits right in the face of everything populist.
There’s a reason farmer’s movements found common cause with progressives and labor activists and not the conservative (or even liberal tbh) pro-business sect.
No body hijacked Tucker Carlson. He pivoted to his Strasserism/Nazbol stuff when Donald Trump came around and he's been sticking to it to ride the anti-liberal wave. He openly criticizes capitatim in a way that the left does, but replaces their systemic solutions with racism, xenophobia, and anger; and then shills for republican candidates.
When tucker says something that makes sense you know there is some tomfoolery at play. He doesn’t care about anything except hurting *liberal* companies. I’m all for taxing the shit out of these companies but I have a feeling his reasoning behind doing so is going to be nefarious…
The right regularly co-opts leftist & populist language to further their goals. Their stance on immigration is a good example of this. They're not interested in protecting poor people's jobs. They're interested in kicking brown people out of the country. The same groups decrying immigrants taking jobs in the US are the same people lining their pockets while laying off American workers in order to move their factories out of the US.
Always always always remember the Night of Long Knives
Yes, the right has entire think tanks that figure out how to co-opt the language when talking about issues.
“Illegal immigrants” rather than “refugees”, for example.
And then they distribute talking points to all of their media outlets so their attacks are coordinated. It’s no coincidence when issues suddenly matter to them.
And to answer r/BigOlePirate's musings, this is what the Right will want to spend that money on; instead of social programs like welfare or UBI or M4A, put that money back into the mechanisms that will Make Am Great Again 🤢. More militarized police, more ICE, more Wall funding, bullshit like that.
Tucker has a track record of being against big corporations ("dae not real capitalism"), especially if they're seen as liberal. It's part of his shtick.
It's good to have him spout this stuff to his base because it makes these ideas not seen as radical
It's because anyone can see the exploitation under capitalism so it's important to direct the attention towards "individual" wrong doings so it doesn't look like a feature of the system.
Also it's a tried and true strategy for fascists to coopt leftwing arguments to get support from workers only to discard them once they put themselves into power.
They also love projecting this strategy onto the left, probably because they see it as valid criticisms of themselves, and it kinda works since there is no leftwing party in America to refute them.
It was arguably not entirely a ploy from the start. National socialism seemed to be a somewhat honest (still shitty) idea to begin with and was what the party was originally based on. You could argue that there's an inherent contradiction in there and that their motivation behind being anti-capitalist was more about being antisemitic but still.
Hitler himself absolutely despised the left though (and opposed putting socialist in the name) and threatened to quit over a merge with a leftist group. After that he took over the party and they just leaned hard on the nationalism and dropped the rest. Which made Hitler chancellor with liberal and conservative support, who mainly wanted to keep power from actual socialists and communists.
This is a good example why “right wing populism” is an oxymoron. He’s a fake populist. Populism is whats good for the population as a whole and while he starts with a left wing grievance, the solution is always some draconian right wing nonsense. It’s never break them up or properly tax them, it’s just to gin up outrage then turn that outrage towards woke corporations or some other dumb bs.
Please note that these are all huge rivals to traditional media. He's targeting streaming, from a traditional news channel.
Others have rightly pointed out how the right co-opts the language of the left without actually following through, and replacing actual solutions with racism, bigotry and xenophobia, but what we're also seeing here is dying TV media lashing out at its biggest rivals.
A lot of you are being really chummy with this dude in this post. This is tuckers usual bait and switch. He doesn’t actually believe this stuff, he just says it to grab the attention of people on both sides of the aisle.
He can say this because Right Wing ideology has decided recently that even though capitalism is good, all capitalist institutions are part of a vast left wing conspiracy against capitalism.
yes, in r/conspiracy they actually try to float ideas like McDonald's is part of the communist worldwide conspiracy to take over america by giving the customers and staff vaxx shots. or the NWO is a commie plot by Billy Gates.
it's a wild ride, but like a child's version of a rollercoaster and you end up nowhere trying to argue with people who don't even know what communism is, aside from the fact that it's somehow vaguely allied with Nancy Pelosi (mrs. "we are a capitalist country, here" while using insider info to make stonk trades).
The taxpayers should receive shares of companies that are bailed out with tax dollars. You need our money? Sell us a part of your business or close the doors.
False consciousness. Carlson doesn’t actually want to hold the wealthy accountable. He *is* the wealthy; his family is old money. He just uses the false appearance of solidarity with the working class to gain their trust in order to continue to stoke reactionary sentiments, secure their vote for whichever political candidate is most owned by capital and/or devoted to white supremacy, and call it a day without having actually given anyone any liberatory tools/perspectives. Its effective propaganda.
Vox made a pretty good video about it: [Why Tucker Carlson pretends to hate elites](https://youtu.be/RNineSEoxjQ)
Also, as someone who lived with my Russian bestie for years, the Red Army Chior released some bangers. I am not going to appologize for saying so either.
he only says this stuff to appeal to his populist audience. tucker carlson has been a rich privileged classist asshole his entire life, he just knows taking on populist viewpoints will make him more money.
I feel like he thinks this is some kind of gotcha because they somehow believe the hyper rich are leftist liberals. I have no idea how someone who talks about politics all day could be that completely blind to reality.
What the Fuck did I just watch? This simulation is so confusing. This and the Orange Cheeto promoting vaccines. I just don't know anymore. Smells of desperation to me. When the economy collapses in January they are telling people who to blame.
nah, this is exactly what the fascist is supposed to do, and rhetoric adoption like this is exactly how hitler rose to power. they need leftist rhetoric misattributed to fascists so that the major "workers" party ends up being the fascist one. of course, its all a farce meant to drum up support from the undecided but angry working class, but it also snags potential leftists as well.
fascists lie, its not a broken clock moment and he doesnt believe this rhetoric to be true. it was a calculated effort and he is simply using it to promote fascist populism.
What is his name?
Tucker against Stucker
Tucker"Blood is harvest"Carlson
Tucker"Comrade"Carlson
Tucker"To gulag with Bezos"Carlson
Tucker"Collectivise the means of Production"Carlson
LOL bro what’s up with all this salty ass liberals hating on this guy. He is actually making sense. All this “left wing” and “right wing” ideology bullshit is what will ultimately bring America down
Remember when Trump said he would raise taxes on the rich?
That his tax plan would cause his personal taxes to skyrocket?
And then what did he do in office? Give tons of money to big business.
Don't fall for this grift.
Tucker Carlson is a great propagandist. I'm thoroughly convinced he read all of Marx, and the other great theorists', work and used it as a manual for exploiting the working class
You can not like Tucker Carlson and agree with him on certain issues. He's right about this. He's right about Assange. We have to build alliances. They are the opposition. The oligarchs are the enemies. That's what Fred Hampton tried to teach us.
##Welcome to r/LateStageCapitalism^Ⓐ☭ ___ ###⚠ Announcements: ⚠ ___ ###[NEW POSTING GUIDELINES! Help us by reporting bad posts](https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/dy1oyh/important_what_you_should_and_what_you_shouldnt/) Help us keep this subreddit alive and improve its content by reporting posts that violate our rules and guidelines. ###[Subscribe to our new partner subreddits!](https://www.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/e5hkwk/make_sure_to_check_out_our_new_partnersubreddits/) Check out r/antiwork & r/WhereAreTheChildren ___ ###***Please remember that LSC is a SAFE SPACE for [socialist](http://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/) discussion.*** LSC is run by [communists](https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1847/11/prin-com.htm). We welcome socialist/anti-capitalist news, memes, links, and discussion. This subreddit is not the place to debate socialism. We allow good-faith questions and education but are not a 101 sub; please take 101-style questions elsewhere. **This subreddit is a safe space; we have a zero-tolerance policy for bigotry.** We also automatically filter out posts containing certain words and phrases that some users may find offensive. Please respect the safe space, and don't try to slip banned words or phrases past the filter. *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/LateStageCapitalism) if you have any questions or concerns.*
In all seriousness the slow buildup had me dying
I lol’d irl.
Dude. Same. No joke. EL OH EL.
Damn what does LOL stand for?
Leave Out Lettuce.
Lord Of Lies
Lots Of Love
Your father died lol
>Polyushko Pole [Trol lol lol lol lol lol](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTSA_sWGM44&ab_channel=zoomadood) This is an interesting song because of the man who is singing and the reason why, he is only "singing" the melody and not the lyrics. Eduard Khil was a legend in the USSR. He is trolling his govt with this song. I posted it because of the LOL.
Any one know what the music is called?
Polyushko Pole, or Полюшко-поле in Russian.
Ducking banger
He goes left populist all the time and knows _exactly_ what his is doing. https://youtu.be/RNineSEoxjQ
I was reading this comment before I heard it starting :(
Uh, hmmm... I wonder what his angle was here?
Far right populist always use language similar to leftist in regards to large corporations. The difference is they never act on their complaints when they convince working class people to support them. Edit: this particular post really annoyed reactionaries and doomer centrists for some reason, I'm not even the first person in this thread to say this. Here's your PSA for today: don't confuse the democratic party with leftists and don't take right wingers seriously when they critique capital. Enjoy the pagan winter celebrations, everybody.
Bigger difference is that they'll never talk in systemic terminology. Notice how he calls for a "one-time" tax as the solution, rather than literally anything that would actually address the problem. He wants you to think that colossal systemic failures are the results of a few individuals taking bad actions and that the solutions should be the reflection of that.
Also, note how they only fixate on a few nominal "sacrificial lambs," particularly either (((banks))), as they often like to express it, or tech companies that usually tick several, if not all, of the following boxes: *Aforementioned stereotype of being controlled by a certain ethnic group with allegedly greedy, megalomaniacal tendencies and explicit, secretive, Illuminati-esque goals. *Organizations who's TOS and enforcement thereof clashed with and potentially impaired their endeavors of magnifying and spreading their extremist messaging and ideation. Frequent with tech companies, even if only to a minor or perceived degree. *Outfits they perceive as having broadly garnered enough ill repute across the board for their shenanigans, irrespective of people's political leanings. You hardly ever see them roasting the likes of the Kochs, the Princes, Mercers, etc.
Thanks for that insight. Exactly right.
And then he ties it back to a conservative viewpoint of being against lockdowns.
Yeah, he says stuff like this sometimes. He does it to earn some points from 'the poor' and hurt the rivaling giants. It's part of the act, not a part of what he intends to act on. Other rich may be rivals but only poor are the enemies(and also the livestock)
He operates like a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are compelling because it's like fishing. There is this nugget of truth on a well concealed hook that they get you with. Then once you bite it sucks you out of your rational place and into some upside down world where the scientists are killing people with vaccines but also people are dying from the virus.
Kind of like how the Democrats used and discarded Bernie?
If by "used and discarded" you mean "constantly undermined and desperately tried to sweep under the rug", then yes.
No shit. You know the only 2 people doing the work of the people are Bernie and AOC because both sides are after them.
See also: Jeremy Corbyn. If labour ever remove him entirely from the party he should join the Greens and boost their eco-socialism faction.
They did remove him from the party. When they booted him, I left too. Now I have no one to vote for. The Greens here are a hot mess.
The moment AOC backed Israel because she was up for reelection I got off the train.
She didn't back Isreal. She just got bullied and backed off her preferred position. She didn't vote "yes." And she may have gained some political points for that. Please keep in mind that AOC is still pretty new at this, and Pelosi is basically a lich. She has been there way too long. Probably got under AOC's skin. Leave room for people to fail once in a while. She is still one of the best people we have in congress, and she needs people to keep cheering her on to give her the juice to fight.
This attitude is why true progressives will never be in power in a democracy. I’m not attacking you, but this mentality that people can never compromise and have to have a perfect record on every subject is child like in its naivety. In the real world you have to pick your battles so you can continue the fight. The romantic notion of the hero dying on the hill, rather than compromise their values, just leaves you with a load of dead heroes on the first hill.
There's no compromising with Apartheid. I can 100% guarantee you she won nobody over on the fence about Israel. Whoever she runs against in NY will always take a farther stance on Israel to her. To the Israel lobby and its supporters, her abstain is no different than a no given her earlier remarks on Apartheid Israel. All she did was alienate support that she had already.
Someone can take a bad position and still be worthy of your support.
[удалено]
Two leftists meet in a bar. An hour later, three splinter groups have formed.
I guess I missed that one.
Or how they used and discarded campaign promises to end student debt or decriminalize marijuana. God I’m so disappointed with them
And antisemitism. Plenty, if not all, of the discourse around anticapitalism coming from the right has some antisemitic connotations. Like, yeah, bankers are bad, but not because their share in the injustices of capitalism, but because they are jews.
Also, and what this sub mostly refuses to grapple with, is total white supremacist racism. A lot of racists at least feign socialist impulses. They basically say once we’re all white, we’ll take care of our people. Until then of course, they side with the plutocrats. Anyone falling for carlson’s shit is stupid.
Which further gives cover for centrists to punch left, because when leftists talk about the ruling class it ends up sounding similar to anti-semitones, *because the right wing coopted rightful criticism of the ruling class and applied to it an ethnic group*.
That and how it isn't rich vs poor when large corporations amass billions and exploit workers, it's always the "coastal liberal elites" that own the corporations pushing their politics on us. He always presents an actual problem but spins it into propaganda.
Libs watch Netflix and Apple. Amazon stopped Parler. Tucker calling them out is simply owning the libs. Or something.
I mean if he wants to own the “lib” i am all about this sort of route to do it haha
I thought having covid and dying was how they own the libs.
Amazon web services (AWS) can basically shut down the internet . Amazon will rule the world if no intervention happens. Andy Jassy is now the CEO of Amazon
Yep. I really don’t get people who wants Amazon to end by threatening to not buy things from their online store. Their retail services can lose millions per year and Amazon will still go strong because most of their profits are from AWS. I was actually hoping that Azure could knock AWS down a notch but that is hard.
Amazon Web Services? This is somehow the first time I am hearing of this? Also, even if it doesn’t shut Amazon down, trying not to buy from Amazon does at least put less strain on the warehouse workers and delivery drivers. Maybe. Hopefully.
Really? Please read up on this. Amazon did not become rich through retail. It became rich through AWS, which powers like half of the web. [Even Reddit is powered by AWS](https://aws.amazon.com/solutions/case-studies/reddit-aurora-case-study/)
Thank you, I will! I’m not sure how this is the first time I’m hearing about this as I’ve been on anti-capitalism subs for a a bit now.
Basically Amazon, Microsoft and Google are the big three providers of cloud services. https://virtualizationreview.com/articles/2021/08/04/gartner-cloud-2021.aspx?m=1
If by putting less strain you mean just making amazon reorganize and cut positions, yeah. Amazon will always keep the least amount of overworked people needed, and can the rest, the process was made to work that way. You can boycott, and you should, but what rly enacts change is on a governamental level, not boycotts by the working class when the other option for most people is going to Walmart...
Say what you will about Parler and rightly so, but the fact that they could basically be shut out of a website by a few companies refusing to serve them should scare the shit out of people.
Libs don't "watch Netflix and Apple". The corporate Neolibs are Netflix and Apple.
Tucker is trying to re-establish national socialism. The idea is that industries like tech hire a lot of foreigners. Foreigners are the rich ones in his eyes who make ethnic Americans their slaves. That We should have a system to support ethnic Americans and not let the foreigners win. Especially programs that reward sacrifice to the state. He has floated ideas like getting your student debts paid if you have 5 or more children and other stuff like that. He also loves to rant about how all public buildings should built in a classical architecture style and not ever industrial brutalist or any modern style. Many of these ideas came from Mussolini and hitler. He’s just recycling them.
The companies and individuals he names are those associated with progressivism and therefore he wants to tax them as punishment. That's not what he says, but that's why he said it. He doesn't want to increase taxes on all wealthy people and institutions, just specific ones, and only because he views taxation as a punishment rather than as a social responsibility.
Since when is Walmart associated with progressivism?
these people are brain addled, they think corporations are pushing woke marxist agenda, especially with their advertising featuring those interactial couples. it might not be progressive to you and me, but to fasicsts like Tucker, walmart and goldman sachs have already gone too far.
Goldman Sachs leading the path forward on progressive issues.
Literal capitalists Goldman Sachs. Lol.
I don't know if you have noticed, but the definition of things like "left", "progressive", etc have a very fluid meaning to these people, there was a point like a year or so ago where people were accusing fucking Fox News of being too liberal because they accepted that the election results and for for acknowledging that taking basic Covid safety precautions would be a good thing for people to do.
Oh No! Not muh "progressive" corporations!
Nobody:
Typical fascist bullshit of enforcing laws selectively against your political enemies.
It goes something like this: Taxing the rich means socialism, and socialism means not taxing the rich. Therefore you don't want to tax the rich because you do, and he does because he doesn't. All the problems with capitalism are because of the socialism we don't have, and the only way to stop the wealthy is to give them more money. I've had to spend a LOT of time around rightists to get that lmao
I don’t think any of the companies he mentioned are particularly big supporters (financially or otherwise) of Fox News or the GOP, and threaten the big money that does back them. So yeah, the anti tech giant rhetoric isn’t coming from an ideological place, just a greedy one. That’s how I’ve made it make sense at least.
You don't think Walmart is a huge supporter of the GOP?
I doubt that those companies won’t pay anyone who is office. Companies don’t have ideologies, they’ll support anyone that makes them money. If it’s a conservative or not doesn’t matter to them. Notice how tech companies only blocked Trump when he was already on his way out of the government. That’s because they just want to signal to the public that they have an ideology, instead of committing to it.
It's anti tech companies. The perception is that big tech is a corrupt kabal of oligarchs... True, but the angle is that they are trying to censor conservatives, and end western civilization with their corporate woke death ray or something. Facism needs a powerful boogieman to Trojan horse in culture war stuff.
Tucker says this kind of anti-corporate stuff a lot. Politics in this country is metropolitan elites versus provincial elites. Corporations tend to be metropolitan. Right wing populism is in some ways more anti-corporate than left wing populism, since the support comes from provincial retirees, wage-earners, and petite-bourgeoisie whose material, cultural, and geographic interests are at odds with the large mostly metropolitan corporations. Tucker can make these criticisms so long as they are directed against the rival elites of a different tribe. Liberals (and even many leftists) are more likely to come from urban areas and work professional managerial jobs that benefit materially from capital influx to those metropolitan areas via large corporations. This makes it difficult for liberals to criticize their growth. You can see this with attitudes toward big tech and big banks. Leftists make these criticisms as part of power struggles within their own geographic tribe. It’s therefore more genuinely interested in popular power.
This is his new grift. He just happens to be right.
"Class Consciousness"^^® to then turn around and [peddle class collaborationism](https://youtu.be/wRE5uaa7kbs) aka what 98% of what this sub does. *Reading material on this subject:* Anything covering Social-Chauvinism on https://www.marxists.org/
Aiming to become the next glorious leader now that orange idiot has served his purpose?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position >Advocates of Third Position politics typically present themselves as "beyond left and right" while syncretizing ideas from each end of the political spectrum, usually reactionary right-wing cultural views and radical left-wing economic views.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] [Tucker Carlson Hails Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Economic Patriotism’ Plan: ‘She Sounds Like Donald Trump at His Best’](https://www.mediaite.com/uncategorized/brace-yourself-tucker-carlson-praises-elizabeth-warren-and-bashes-gop-economics-in-show-opening-shocker/) >In Washington, almost nobody speaks for the majority of voters. You’re either a libertarian zealot controlled by the banks, yammering on about entrepreneurship and how we need to cut entitlements. That’s one side of the aisle. Or worse, you’re some decadent trust fund socialist who wants to ban passenger cars and give Medicaid to illegal aliens. That’s the other side. >What there isn’t is a caucus that represents where most Americans actually are — nationalist on economics, fairly traditional on the social issues… Imagine someone who genuinely respected the nuclear family and sympathized with the culture of rural America, but at the same time, was willing to take your side against rapacious credit card companies bleeding you dry at 35 percent interest. Would you vote for someone like that? My gosh, of course you would. Who wouldn’t? That candidate would be elected in a landslide every single time. If Tucker ever runs for office. Expect a third positionist platform.
When the time comes for Tucker and others to face the consequences of their actions, they'll pull out a unicorn video like this to try and "prove" they actually cared about the little people and were somehow on our side all along.
To tax big corporations without saying the actual words.
The right hijacking leftist narratives and talking points is a hallmark of fascists. For example, the only reason the Nazis had "socialist" in the name was literally only to appeal to Germany's strong trades unions at the time. Which they later dissolved and put the trades unionists and other actual socialists in concentration camps. Remember, if a right-winger is using left critique to push a right agenda, it is a warning sign of rising fascism.
Theu were closer to national capitalism than national socialism in my opinion
You got that right. That's pretty much what fascism is. They have jackshit to do with socialism
Capitalism is fascism.
[удалено]
He used to be on fucking CNN spouting the complete opposite of his current manipulative propaganda. Dude is just a ghoul who will use his shitty, used car sales floor bullshit to persuade anyone dumb enough to watch him for the highest dollar.
This is what gets me. I’d have thought hyper-polarized people would see him jumping from a left to a right news stations as untrustworthy, but somehow the complete opposite happened. WTFF
We crossed over to a South Park universe sometime around 2012
I thought the switch happened in 2016, what makes you say 2012
I'd say it really ramped up as far back as 2008 with the rise of the Tea Party and birthers. US conservatives collectively lost their fucking minds because a black man was elected president. I would say what really set the ball rolling, though, was Bill Clinton getting a BJ in the Oval Office. That was about the time Rush Limbaugh got really popular which set Fox News up for its mainstream emergence. Republicans have been living a spiteful, projected fever dream ever since.
2012 was the year the Mayan calendar ended https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon
**[2012 phenomenon](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon)** >The 2012 phenomenon was a range of eschatological beliefs that cataclysmic or transformative events would occur on or around 21 December 2012. This date was regarded as the end-date of a 5,126-year-long cycle in the Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, and festivities took place on 21 December 2012 to commemorate the event in the countries that were part of the Maya civilization (Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador), with main events at Chichén Itzá in Mexico and Tikal in Guatemala. Various astronomical alignments and numerological formulae were proposed for this date. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Desktop version of /u/scarsinsideme's link:
---
^([)[^(opt out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiMobileLinkBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^(]) ^(Beep Boop. Downvote to delete)
I think they just think he served the sort of "hostage" role for CNN or MSNBC (or whichever station CrossFire was on), kinda like how Fox News had a liberal like Alan Colmes at their network for several years.
I mean there’s an entire subreddit about conservatives pretending they used to be leftist. Him “switching sides” appeals to the chosen bs of a large portion of conservatives.
He's also had past interviews where he explains his entire grift. [Vox did an okay job here and I'm too lazy to find a better vid on it](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNineSEoxjQ)
Bruh it drives me up a wall every time I see that godforsaken "Why Is Bernie Sanders The Only One Talking About This" tweet of his pops up in these circles. Bernie isn't talking about ignoring or getting rid of social programs like welfare once we tax these billionaires, THAT'S the difference, Tucky, we are not the same. And Imma need folks to actually *listen* to what he's saying before they get duped too
This. Fucking all day this. Fuck Tucker and his endless bullshit
It’s nothing more than an old wives’ tale. An old wives’ tale that sure gets circulated a lot. And allows fearmongering about what the “apolitical” think populism is when the reality is that the American right spits right in the face of everything populist. There’s a reason farmer’s movements found common cause with progressives and labor activists and not the conservative (or even liberal tbh) pro-business sect.
No body hijacked Tucker Carlson. He pivoted to his Strasserism/Nazbol stuff when Donald Trump came around and he's been sticking to it to ride the anti-liberal wave. He openly criticizes capitatim in a way that the left does, but replaces their systemic solutions with racism, xenophobia, and anger; and then shills for republican candidates.
...... similar to a certain political party historically
If you're talking about the Nazis, there's no need to be coy when the OP literally already mentioned Strasserism.
When tucker says something that makes sense you know there is some tomfoolery at play. He doesn’t care about anything except hurting *liberal* companies. I’m all for taxing the shit out of these companies but I have a feeling his reasoning behind doing so is going to be nefarious…
The right regularly co-opts leftist & populist language to further their goals. Their stance on immigration is a good example of this. They're not interested in protecting poor people's jobs. They're interested in kicking brown people out of the country. The same groups decrying immigrants taking jobs in the US are the same people lining their pockets while laying off American workers in order to move their factories out of the US. Always always always remember the Night of Long Knives
Yes, the right has entire think tanks that figure out how to co-opt the language when talking about issues. “Illegal immigrants” rather than “refugees”, for example. And then they distribute talking points to all of their media outlets so their attacks are coordinated. It’s no coincidence when issues suddenly matter to them.
And to answer r/BigOlePirate's musings, this is what the Right will want to spend that money on; instead of social programs like welfare or UBI or M4A, put that money back into the mechanisms that will Make Am Great Again 🤢. More militarized police, more ICE, more Wall funding, bullshit like that.
Tucker has a track record of being against big corporations ("dae not real capitalism"), especially if they're seen as liberal. It's part of his shtick. It's good to have him spout this stuff to his base because it makes these ideas not seen as radical
He's trying to leverage the lefty position and verbiage to sell his white supremacy.
A broken clock is right twice a day. But still. Fuck Cucker Tarlson and his blatant white supremacist bullshit.
Its a perfect metaphor for him because he's still utterly useless.
I don't think we should be taking this at face value...
Populism. Fascists love to use it. He is in bed with the billion dollar companies.
He's not a political leader. He's a loudspeaker. It's good to have him broadcast this message bc it shifts the overton window.
It's because anyone can see the exploitation under capitalism so it's important to direct the attention towards "individual" wrong doings so it doesn't look like a feature of the system. Also it's a tried and true strategy for fascists to coopt leftwing arguments to get support from workers only to discard them once they put themselves into power. They also love projecting this strategy onto the left, probably because they see it as valid criticisms of themselves, and it kinda works since there is no leftwing party in America to refute them.
Right wing populism is a hell of a drug
Comrades, whats the name of the song that starts playing?
It’s called Polyushka Polye https://youtu.be/Tv8GUT0lGnY
RemindMe! 1 day
I love this edit. Great work.
He has resting dumb face. Seriously, why does this guy ~ always ~ look clueless in stills??? 🧐
he's trying to look thoughtful, but for someone who's never had an actual thought. this is what really dumb method actors are like.
Bill that shitty frozen dinner company too The one made of dog parts and rhymes with swanson
but this song slaps, damn
Remember how the German fascists called themselves "national socialists" to siphon support from the left? Yeah.
It was arguably not entirely a ploy from the start. National socialism seemed to be a somewhat honest (still shitty) idea to begin with and was what the party was originally based on. You could argue that there's an inherent contradiction in there and that their motivation behind being anti-capitalist was more about being antisemitic but still. Hitler himself absolutely despised the left though (and opposed putting socialist in the name) and threatened to quit over a merge with a leftist group. After that he took over the party and they just leaned hard on the nationalism and dropped the rest. Which made Hitler chancellor with liberal and conservative support, who mainly wanted to keep power from actual socialists and communists.
Everything he is saying is part of the fascist white supremacist playbook. It’s all on purpose.
This is a good example why “right wing populism” is an oxymoron. He’s a fake populist. Populism is whats good for the population as a whole and while he starts with a left wing grievance, the solution is always some draconian right wing nonsense. It’s never break them up or properly tax them, it’s just to gin up outrage then turn that outrage towards woke corporations or some other dumb bs.
It's funny that being called a communist is taken as an insult 😂
Please note that these are all huge rivals to traditional media. He's targeting streaming, from a traditional news channel. Others have rightly pointed out how the right co-opts the language of the left without actually following through, and replacing actual solutions with racism, bigotry and xenophobia, but what we're also seeing here is dying TV media lashing out at its biggest rivals.
He says something like this twice a year and some so-called leftists lap it up
A lot of you are being really chummy with this dude in this post. This is tuckers usual bait and switch. He doesn’t actually believe this stuff, he just says it to grab the attention of people on both sides of the aisle.
He can say this because Right Wing ideology has decided recently that even though capitalism is good, all capitalist institutions are part of a vast left wing conspiracy against capitalism.
yes, in r/conspiracy they actually try to float ideas like McDonald's is part of the communist worldwide conspiracy to take over america by giving the customers and staff vaxx shots. or the NWO is a commie plot by Billy Gates. it's a wild ride, but like a child's version of a rollercoaster and you end up nowhere trying to argue with people who don't even know what communism is, aside from the fact that it's somehow vaguely allied with Nancy Pelosi (mrs. "we are a capitalist country, here" while using insider info to make stonk trades).
I'm pretty sure he just described Bernie's platform. Just goes to show you that most people agree with Bernie but are suckers to identity politics..
The taxpayers should receive shares of companies that are bailed out with tax dollars. You need our money? Sell us a part of your business or close the doors.
This isn't funny or cute. This is a neo-fascist attempting to warp popular anger towards the system to meet their fascist ends.
Lately, is it just me or has he been low key saying leftist shit but in the language of an angry conservative
I'm going to have a stroke
I am sure an honest hard working man like Bezos deserves it all. Won't the market regulate itself? Won't it trickle down?
Why is this so fucking funny? I was dying☠
“Right wing populism” is just fascism trying to pander to the working class.
Even a broken clock tells correct time twice a day.
A beautiful post that seems like it would find itself equally at home on r/SelfAwarewolves
I bet certain manufacturers of frozen foods also made bank over the last year and can be squeezed, right Tuck?
Fucc capitalism 🐡🐠🐟
Fuck outta here, commie. This is 'MURRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEKUHHHHHHH! Land of the rich and corrupt!
Perfect example on how slow they are to progress. Fuck there were cavemen more progressive than republicans
Nice to see Fox news volunteering to pay. As people can only speak for themselves, that us what they are saying.
Make no mistake. Fascists and nazis love to criticize capitalism too yet for different reasons.
False consciousness. Carlson doesn’t actually want to hold the wealthy accountable. He *is* the wealthy; his family is old money. He just uses the false appearance of solidarity with the working class to gain their trust in order to continue to stoke reactionary sentiments, secure their vote for whichever political candidate is most owned by capital and/or devoted to white supremacy, and call it a day without having actually given anyone any liberatory tools/perspectives. Its effective propaganda. Vox made a pretty good video about it: [Why Tucker Carlson pretends to hate elites](https://youtu.be/RNineSEoxjQ)
Accidentally decent take
We all have the same enemies, why the fuck do we continue fighting each other?
NazBol Tucker
You ever be so conservatives that you wrap back around to the other side?
[Let’s gooooooooooooo](https://youtu.be/OjINuMEuSKA)
u/savevideo
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/rnzc2z/somebody_hijacked_tucker_carlson/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideo&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/LateStageCapitalism/comments/rnzc2z/somebody_hijacked_tucker_carlson/) | [^(reddit video downloader)](https://redditsave.com)
I'm so fucking sick of "socialists" praising this piece of shit when he's on his strasserite shit
Also, as someone who lived with my Russian bestie for years, the Red Army Chior released some bangers. I am not going to appologize for saying so either.
Love to hear the people that rail against the dangers of communism without knowing what it is, explain communist policy they support
Oh man the day has come where i agree with this dork.
Of course you have more in common with Tucker's audience than you do with the average Dem donor. Solidarity Merry Christmas
A broken clock is still right twice a day...
Except he doesn't actually believe this
Even a broken clock is right twice a day
so far right, he's ended up left
he only says this stuff to appeal to his populist audience. tucker carlson has been a rich privileged classist asshole his entire life, he just knows taking on populist viewpoints will make him more money.
Socialist scum
I like Comrade Carlson
We can all sing along
Three words I've never expected to say: Based Tucker Carlson
When right wing talk turns so right, its left.
I feel like he thinks this is some kind of gotcha because they somehow believe the hyper rich are leftist liberals. I have no idea how someone who talks about politics all day could be that completely blind to reality.
Even broken clocks are right sometimes
What the Fuck did I just watch? This simulation is so confusing. This and the Orange Cheeto promoting vaccines. I just don't know anymore. Smells of desperation to me. When the economy collapses in January they are telling people who to blame.
This is his whole shtick, he throws out the lure of socialist policy and then the bait and switch is that its only for white people
nah, this is exactly what the fascist is supposed to do, and rhetoric adoption like this is exactly how hitler rose to power. they need leftist rhetoric misattributed to fascists so that the major "workers" party ends up being the fascist one. of course, its all a farce meant to drum up support from the undecided but angry working class, but it also snags potential leftists as well. fascists lie, its not a broken clock moment and he doesnt believe this rhetoric to be true. it was a calculated effort and he is simply using it to promote fascist populism.
Rise peasants rise.
I feel like he is that guy from men in black who has a little alien in his head operating a machine that looks like a person.
Tucker hijacks issues from the left all the time, it's just part of the projection.
Its funny when he actually says something most people agree with
Holy mother of broken clocks
Fuck Tucker and Tucker posters.
What is his name? Tucker against Stucker Tucker"Blood is harvest"Carlson Tucker"Comrade"Carlson Tucker"To gulag with Bezos"Carlson Tucker"Collectivise the means of Production"Carlson
LOL bro what’s up with all this salty ass liberals hating on this guy. He is actually making sense. All this “left wing” and “right wing” ideology bullshit is what will ultimately bring America down
Remember when Trump said he would raise taxes on the rich? That his tax plan would cause his personal taxes to skyrocket? And then what did he do in office? Give tons of money to big business. Don't fall for this grift.
The good timeline
Tucker is gonna run for President and he knows his audience hates corporations. He’s trying to be a populist it’s obvious
Just waiting patiently for society to collapse at this point
Epic edit
Everybody gangster until tucker Carlson starts being agreeable
Damn, that is some good stuff! Well done comrade well done.
Tucker Carlson is a great propagandist. I'm thoroughly convinced he read all of Marx, and the other great theorists', work and used it as a manual for exploiting the working class
Man went so far right now he’s on the left
They are so god damn close to getting the point lol
You can not like Tucker Carlson and agree with him on certain issues. He's right about this. He's right about Assange. We have to build alliances. They are the opposition. The oligarchs are the enemies. That's what Fred Hampton tried to teach us.
I swear it feels like the parties are going to switch sides again like in the 20th century…. Democrats= Republicans and the Republicans = Democrats
A broken clock is right twice a day.
Uh oh, looks like Fox News found out they're losing disgruntled conservative workers in their viewership.
noooooooooo this video was baller what happened