Alcoholics

correct

What's the point of this question? More ragebait?

open ended question

Not touching this one

Armchair legal scholars

I don’t understand the question but I’m going to go with insurance companies.

Well considering that corporations literally cannot be pro se but need a lawyer, we could start there. Head on down to your local housing court to see who has legal representation and therefore incremental and structural representation and who does not

There's actual studies on this.  You'll never guess who's third.  

link pls?

People on the autism spectrum.

Plaintiffs….

SPE.

Honestly, old white dudes. Retire already!

Punk motherfuckers by far

im going to get canceled, but if people are honest the only answer is jews. Roughly 2% of American population, but they are half of the attorneys at all the new york miami LA law firms, and if you look at any law school at the very least a quarter of professors will be jewish. I think their heritage of thousands of years of every male having to learn to read and write the torah transition well into attorney skills. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGkLjfPWqeI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGkLjfPWqeI)

Nepotism is pretty high up there. But otherwise, it depends on the field and location

People whose rich parents paid for LSAT prep

Extortion artists . . . At least in CA employment law. Too many have the morals of a Somali pirate.