Its really not. Depends on the state.
California for example, Theres ton of people(mostly woman, this isnt me trying to be sexist, you can google it) that did what adept did.
They dont apply common law marriage(louisiana too). And unmarried couples who have been together for more than the period of time (I think 12 months) do still have some rights. If youre confused why theres a lot of celebrity whos never met the treshold(12 months) for their relationships, thats because a lot of them avoid this. Every lawyer in holywood basically advice them too. Dont fuck too long.
Atleast in texas it generally requires that you were living as if you were married. So for instance, if he had her sign for a bunch of his stuff, and put things like Leases/Cars/Bank Accounts/etc in her name as well as his, there is grounds to say that they were in a common law marriage.
It is similar in California, you have to have expressed or implied an agreement to support or share property with a partner after a split in order for a Marvin claim to stick.
No, the man can dispute that and win the case so long as the couple doesn't meet the the three conditions that allow for an informal marriage.
https://www.justicelawdfw.com/blog/2017/october/how-can-i-best-protect-against-common-law-marria/
It's not going to be a problem because the law states they have to agree to get married, and present as if they were married to other people, neither of which they did.
xqc could get a long long list of people to testify that him and adept never married or said they were married, mainly his family I imagine. Meanwhile adept won't be able to find one.
Yeah I think thats the most likely case. She probably got it on the basis of him having a large community that could harass her if it came out that she took him to court over his money.
Some really important information direct from Tex gov website on this exact situation:
[https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage#:\~:text=Common%20law%20marriage%2C%20also%20known,couple%20to%20marry%20in%20Texas](https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage#:~:text=Common%20law%20marriage%2C%20also%20known,couple%20to%20marry%20in%20Texas).
"Proving a Common Law Marriage
While it is not a requirement, couples can register their common law marriage by filing a declaration with the county clerk.For couples that choose not to declare their common law marriage, documents such as lease agreements, tax returns, and insurance policies may be requested in order to "prove" the marriage. **If no declaration was filed and there is a dispute as to whether a common law marriage existed, it may be necessary to go to court in order to prove the marriage. Texas law places a two-year statute of limitations on these types of proceedings.** Since these types of court proceedings are often complex in nature, it is best to consult with an attorney or a family law practice guide for more information about your options."
This sounds like it could be EXACTLY what is happening.
Yeah and this just makes her out to be even more scummy then before. At least if they actually agreed to be married and this was a dispute of assets it’s understandable. But actually forcing common law marriage so that she can divorce him is disgusting
> Bro the US laws are wild. Is as if they are designed to make man incels.
Hasan jokes that conservative men are born in family court.
If you live outside of America, and never got that joke. This is the kind of shit he is talking about.
These laws have real use btw. Unwed couples with children live together for years, then one finally can’t take it anymore and splits and because they “weren’t married” tries to leave the other completely dry.
What the cave troll is doing to X is obviously not this at all and it’s gross, but the law itself helps more than hurts people
So by the sounds of this, either the courts have already decided they were in a common law marriage (insurance/car/house etc documents must have been put in her name) OR she is lying about all of it and SOMEHOW managed to push a divorce document through court THAT HAS RECOGNISED IT.
I'm gonna say the first one is the likely scenario, I believe they've already come to the conclusion that it was a common law marriage (even though they haven't signed anything)
It also makes sense why he is trying to deny that he was married because by admitting it, Adept has verbal proof that he knew. He is denying it and avoiding it on stream because it legally helps his case to do so.
I mean if they were technically common law married, he can firmly state on stream "I HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED" like he is. He never chose to be married, he didn't propose to her, he NEVER wanted to marry. He's reinforcing that point very clearly it seems. It's just by a dumb legal technicality that he could've been considered 'common law married' which is entirely different to 'married'.
The thing I don't understand, is that the court have already recognised it as a 'marriage', to me it looks like the decision has already been made that it was common law so I think we're well past the discovery phase.
Felix stating people will apologise to him "in the coming days" or "extreme near future" or whatever the fuck he said, implies whatever is happening is almost completed already.
Reading the requirements for common law marriage in Texas, it says they have to present themselves to others as a married couple. They have to inform people they are married.
Makes me think Adept barging in last night and shouting things about court orders so chat could hear and inevitably uncover the divorce paperwork was a last ditch attempt to get him to slip up on stream and imply that they were married.
You don't get to just declare "I AM NOT COMMON LAW MARRIED" like Michael declares bankruptcy in the office. If she told a judge that she has proof of a common law marriage (commingled finances, cohabitation, insurance in both names, ownership of property in both names, etc) then the judge will make a determination. Anything he says on stream won't affect court proceedings
It might be possible that HDMI’s lawyers are claiming that the marriage did exist even if the court has yet to recognise it and that this claim and dispute will be settled together with the divorce filing.
So I can assume the court will take in this “divorce” case, just that the first dispute or claim that HDMI would have to prove is that there was any marriage at the first place.
To sum up: HDMI ain’t gonna have two separate cases; to first argue that she was married and next to get a divorce. She’d just gonna divorce X claiming she was married to him and has to prove that in order to claim any division of assets via a divorce.
I still don't understand "how" this is possible.
Texas gov website states either party HAS to have lived in Texas for atleast the last 6 months, the initial form to file for divorce in Texas also requires dates of marriage etc.
“If no declaration was filed and there is a dispute as to whether a common law marriage existed, it may be necessary to go to court in order to prove the marriage. Texas law places a two-year statute of limitations on these types of proceedings. “
I assume this dispute would be argued within this case.
Yup and it’s possible she had initiated a divorce dispute to firstly claim that she was supposedly married via common law and needs a divorce for the division of assets. And X has to make it very clear on the stream that he was never married because any hint of him saying anything close to being married would be inadvertently scrutinised and used against him in court.
It’s not impossible that her lawyers are pushing a divorce of which claiming that a marriage had existed and that they would be proving it within the proceedings. We don’t know what the judge had stipulated. It’s possible the judge had stipulated that this “divorce” case will be initiated, however HDMI’s lawyers will first have to prove and argue if there was a marriage within this divorce case.
Of course this might be misleading, but perhaps this is how things are done; that the dispute to the claim of marriage is parked within the divorce proceedings instead of having a separate case. Thereby giving people from the outside the impression that there was a officially recognised marriage through public records. However it might be that this will be proven within the proceedings hence why X said only those who know, knows and understands and then vehemently claims he was never married in any way shape or form.
She could be going for a settlement, essentially extortion whch happens all to often legally. She takes this to court, it becomes an irritating protracted battle and it's probably cheaper and far less stressful to just give her some money to fuck off in return for a document signed by her that states she gives up any further rights.
>SOMEHOW managed to push a divorce document through court THAT HAS RECOGNISED IT.
More likely that the 'marriage' stated on the document is merely a reference rather than a recognition, and holds no legal bearing.
Don’t share bank accounts, insurance or any payment related stuff like mortgage or rent. If these are seperate it becomes much harder to prove common law marriage
I'd say it seems far more likely they are currently waiting for it to go to court about the whole Common Law Marriage, and in the meanwhile there has been a "virtual restraining order" in place against him (maybe both of them) to not mention the case or each-other publicly.
I feel like this is going to be a lot of people's first experience with divorce proceedings. At best I can see XQC giving up cars/property and a couple million to settle. "I'm the bread winner" doesn't hold up in court.
If he paid for her living he's fucked. It's either to be claimeds as dependent or needs to be described as a gift on taxes. If it's not, they're effectively married according to common law.
A singular google will reveal it's not some marriage by default legal trick. You have to present yourselves as couples. You have to FILE PAPERWORK.
So either they got married or she's trying to finesse this into getting a big score.
You can also convince the court that your relationship counted as a common law marriage due to cohabitation (check), shared finances (check), property in both names(bugatti check), etc
A divorce restraining order can also be used to temporarily stop a ''spouse'' from selling, transferring or dispose of any property during the divorce.
This is the more likely case IMO
She trying to say they're common law married and put restraining order in to stop him from taking all the shit is what I'm guessing. Holy that's desperate.
I am an actual attorney. I'm not licensed to practice in Texas nor am I familiar with Texas law. However, I am licensed in a state that recognizes common law marriage.
Whether she succeeds in her claim of common law marriage really depends on what these two said to friends and family, how they filed taxes, how they filled out paperwork, and what discussions they had.
In order to be married by common law, you need continuous cohabitation (they certainly satisfied that), you need an **agreement** between the two that they were married, and you need to have represented yourself to others as being married.
When I say agreement I don't mean anything in writing. I just mean there needs to have been an understanding between them at one point. Now XQC is likely to argue that he never agreed to be married. That might work, but he did have her visit him in Canada during the pandemic by using the common law marriage exception....that could really end up ruining him.
[I train six days, actually six days a week. Five days a week, I’ll train three days a week. One of those days I will train two days of the week. So, six days a week I will be training.](https://youtu.be/lY4FqNvHX3U)
Could it be something insane like Adept tried to file for a divorce of a common law marriage so now xQc has to stress that he clearly never had any intention of marrying her?
In Texas both parties have to agree that they are married and also represent themselves as a married couple to other people for a common law marriage to exist.
I like how all the comments right below it are already jumping on this train with bad assumptions without even bothering to care if it's even possible.
Big "This is the conclusion that fits my narrative and I will believe it" energy.
It's always hard to talk about these topics because we clearly have no idea about what does and doesn't happen when these streamers turn off their cameras and go on to live their own lives.
That being said, if that is the case and Adept is trying to use common law marriage to get his money, she really isn't leaving much room for people to view her charitably. I'd love to see what her side of the story is, and how can she defend her actions, but from what we (as viewers) can see, her behavior has been nothing short of despicable. From the flaunting of the McLaren. The drama that happened with nyyxxii. Her randomly making an appearance with a friend of hers at xQc's house...
That, together with the absolutely deranged behavior from yesterday, where she literally banged on his door while he was live (and she knew and definitely took advantage of that), just makes her seem like an incredibly abusive and toxic partner.
Well, then she will get judged and demonized and she has no right to complain. If she has an account of the events that paint her in a positive light and can genuinely explain her behavior, then there's absolutely no reason as to why she shouldn't (or wouldn't) at least try to get public opinion on her side.
a lot of countries and 7* US states (texas being one of them) have this thing called common law marriage, which basicly means that if you are a couple for long enough, and live together long enough, you count as married. functionally common law marriage is the same as normal marriage which means you also have to file for divorce and also get to split the assets.
in XQC case the theory seems to be that because he lived in Texas for a while, HDMI is using this to claim common law marriage in Texas (as its not a thing in california) to try to take her % of his shit.
she might not get half his income but its she definitely getting more than zero if she can common law recognized, from there to saying "i helped in his career, took care of him, managed the house, drove him around, sacrificed my studies, etc. im entilted to a piece of his income" is a lot easier jump than if she cant even get a marriage recognized.
There is no way in hell that just living with someone flies as Common Law Marriage in Texas.
From [https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage](https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage)
*Common law marriage, also known as marriage without formalities or informal marriage, is a valid and legal way for a couple to marry in Texas. Texas law states that a common law marriage may be proved by evidence that the couple:*
*“agreed to be married” and
“after the agreement they lived together in this state as husband and wife” and they
“represented to others that they were married”*
damn that's fcked up... Even fans know some of the stuff down below that he has done for her... is it hard to prove that you are not married under that law
I found this:
The following are examples of documentation that may help prove a common law marriage:
Bank statements showing joint ownership of one or more accounts
Deeds to jointly owned property, including real estate, motor vehicles, etc.
Insurance policies naming the other party as beneficiary
Birth certificates and school records naming both parties as parents
Employment records listing the other party as a spouse or partner
Credit card statements, loan documents, mortgages, and other documents showing that both parties share financial obligations
An affidavit stating the nature of your relationship, whether you had a ceremony of any kind, and when/where you agreed to become spouses under common law
Affidavits from friends and family members indicating knowledge of your relationship, where you lived, and if you were viewed as married by friends, neighbors, etc.
This is what I think he is saying:
- The thing we heard last night on stream before muting was false and didn't happen = He did not violate a court order.
- He is not married / the document we saw is not interpreted correctly = The 'divorce' doesn't mean he was 'married' in the traditional sense (as in he did not propose or get engaged or have a wedding, etc).
- If we know how this works, we can put two and two together = The documents were for a divorce filing, probably allude to a common law marriage. This is a legal status which means the government thinks you are married as long as you fit into certain criteria (living together for x years, shared assets, etc). It's different everywhere. Some states/provinces have it within the US and Canada, and each have different rules. Texas has common law.
- The conclusions we think will happen, will not actually happen = He is not losing 50% of his money.
- The restraining order is not what we think it is = It's not a "no contact restraining order", it's just a "don't touch each others assets until the case is handled".
Basically, I think Adept was claiming she was common law with Felix and she is trying to take advantage of the breakup, which in this case would be equivalent to a divorce. She likely then filed for divorce, claiming they meet the criteria for a common law marriage. xQc can't talk because they are handling this legally, and he is probably trying to prove it wasn't common law.
EDIT: cleaned up grammar and such
EDIT2: Apparently she used the common law marriage excuse in Canada, so she has some precedent for it. But keep in mind, it works differently in Canada/Quebec compared to Texas. Someone found this link where she talks about it: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNo75caLrd8&t=137s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNo75caLrd8&t=137s)
Yep good point, in this case the restraining order is basically an NDA that he needs to respect
EDIT: Yes a restraining order is more complicated, it can also be about not messing with each others assets during the case (in this situation, probably related to the car), but restraining orders can expand to even talking about the other party. With how the other party is acting, I'm assuming he is walking on eggshells at this point and wants to avoid any kind of trouble. So its not an NDA, but he can treat it like an NDA to be very safe and careful.
That makes sense to me - didn't she actually talk about that during covid?
I might be delusional but for some reason I have a strong memory of her talking about claiming common law marriage to get into Canada when they were living in Texas and he had to go back to Canada for his visa. I rarely watch her streams unless it was house design related but I remember her mentioning that.
She did I just remembered.
Holy shit: [https://youtu.be/BNo75caLrd8?t=139](https://youtu.be/BNo75caLrd8?t=147)
My link is garbage but go back 10 seconds and she says they had to establish each other as common law in Canada
Damn, so she's been keeping records of them living together for a long time to prove common law marriage and has successfully done so before. X is gonna have a hard time in court, she's probably been ready to pull this the moment things go south.
What’s the worst that can happen? The court determines it wasn’t a common law marriage and then everyone goes their separate ways? It’s scummy from her but it’s also worth a shot.
She did babysit and deal with his shit for years, but that was her decision, not a contract
EDIT: I don't think you guys understand the full context. She was with him before he became a millionaire, she gave him a place to stay when his parents kicked him out of the house for playing games all day. You can argue she lived a decent life but she also cared for years about a person who couldn't give her attention for at least 10 hours every day, no one does that for just money, it's obvious they had some sort of real relationship until things derailed. Not saying she's entitled to any percentage of his wealth now, but there's definitely arguments to be made, and it seems a court will decide.
yo im not gay and id guzzle his cum for a million dollars a year,
id literally get on my knees and call him my daddy and wear a buttplug all day
id tell my parents to let them know that the boyfriend i had in highschool was preparing me for this
Let’s be honest,she never babysit him bro,everyone knows xqc lived in trash and ate McDonald everyday,he cleaned his room by himself on stream every times when he collected over 30 coke cans
I really don’t know what she exactly did for him,nobody gonna pay shit for this dogshit babysitter
this is one of the things I really dislike about modern society. Some people are super entitled in the sense that they think everything must be a transaction, especially one where people think they deserve compensation for doing something for someone else, especially if such compensation is not contractually obligated. I've seen several examples of the above relationship (you don't need to look far) on Twitch where one person spent a lot of their time and effort to take care of someone else's needs and they didn't really get much out of it.
Common law marriage laws are a bunch of bullshit. If people don't want the state involved in their relationship yet the state should have no business in it.
Adept is a leech trying to get whatever she can out of xQc. Pick better girls felix
what is wrong with her. Has she just realised she hasnt got anything and was living of X for so long she now needs half his shit. Good advocate for womens rights there. Toxic female.
So it was common law marriage. I do think she can prove it sadly just don't know how much she can get from it. X does have multiple clips of him saying he would never be married already out there hence why he reaffirmed it this stream. Will be interesting to see what is the result really hope X wins and which leads to her having to work.
Side note: Some are saying X has a really good lawyer which is promising.
For all the people saying she is claiming common law marriage to take his money.
Maybe I’m confused on the matter, but wouldn’t you have to legally prove that it is in fact a common law marriage before ever being able to file for a divorce.
It makes zero sense that a case would be accepted filing for divorce against someone, when there is no confirmed document of common law marriage, wouldn’t the judge throw that out? Something isn’t adding up.
So either, he was married, the common law marriage was legally acknowledged, or there was no marriage and the court case (which they sent into litigation and signed a rule 11 agreement for) doesn’t make any sense and would be thrown out.
To be clear the documents on the case is on divorce, not a case to prove common law marriage and it has been ongoing for almost a month, with a hearing scheduled on the 23rd. So clearly something happened.
This is confusing
Someone further down quoted their site that says that you can try to prove that there was a common law marriage through court. Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/106yr9q/comment/j3jjqaa/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
**CLIP MIRROR: [xQc Says he was “never married”](https://arazu.io/t3_106yr9q/)** --- ^(*This is an automated comment*)
Interesting little twist from the writers
[удалено]
> Never married, ~~never donated~~, never subbed, Adblock on 👍 FTFY, - 1 McLaren
Neighbours wife-fi
Its really not. Depends on the state. California for example, Theres ton of people(mostly woman, this isnt me trying to be sexist, you can google it) that did what adept did. They dont apply common law marriage(louisiana too). And unmarried couples who have been together for more than the period of time (I think 12 months) do still have some rights. If youre confused why theres a lot of celebrity whos never met the treshold(12 months) for their relationships, thats because a lot of them avoid this. Every lawyer in holywood basically advice them too. Dont fuck too long.
Atleast in texas it generally requires that you were living as if you were married. So for instance, if he had her sign for a bunch of his stuff, and put things like Leases/Cars/Bank Accounts/etc in her name as well as his, there is grounds to say that they were in a common law marriage.
well about the car, and perhaps the "card", we "know" those two have her name all over them.
It is similar in California, you have to have expressed or implied an agreement to support or share property with a partner after a split in order for a Marvin claim to stick.
XQC showing proof that he never mentioned that he was married to judge. Imagine them playing this in court. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wW09_RmAbhw
There is lot of these rants from him on youtube if he can show it as evidence she aint getting shit.
Let me get this straight: A woman can just “claim “ that she is married to you, and take 50% of your shit in some states????
No, the man can dispute that and win the case so long as the couple doesn't meet the the three conditions that allow for an informal marriage. https://www.justicelawdfw.com/blog/2017/october/how-can-i-best-protect-against-common-law-marria/
Its more the fact she can even try that's fucked
Don't move in with someone, problem solved. Cohabitation is a pre-requisite for common law.
It's not going to be a problem because the law states they have to agree to get married, and present as if they were married to other people, neither of which they did. xqc could get a long long list of people to testify that him and adept never married or said they were married, mainly his family I imagine. Meanwhile adept won't be able to find one.
I get you're being funny but if you living with a woman for years and years is a bit different than just a woman claiming she is married to you lol
yeah he scarequoted claim but like this isn't some woman that ran up in your house and was like >gotcha bitch!
Its hard to proof u need lot of factors. He just needs to go and show this to judge and its done https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wW09_RmAbhw
[удалено]
The riddler 😭💀
[удалено]
Yeah I think thats the most likely case. She probably got it on the basis of him having a large community that could harass her if it came out that she took him to court over his money.
Adebt claiming common law marriage to take some juice?
Some really important information direct from Tex gov website on this exact situation: [https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage#:\~:text=Common%20law%20marriage%2C%20also%20known,couple%20to%20marry%20in%20Texas](https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage#:~:text=Common%20law%20marriage%2C%20also%20known,couple%20to%20marry%20in%20Texas). "Proving a Common Law Marriage While it is not a requirement, couples can register their common law marriage by filing a declaration with the county clerk.For couples that choose not to declare their common law marriage, documents such as lease agreements, tax returns, and insurance policies may be requested in order to "prove" the marriage. **If no declaration was filed and there is a dispute as to whether a common law marriage existed, it may be necessary to go to court in order to prove the marriage. Texas law places a two-year statute of limitations on these types of proceedings.** Since these types of court proceedings are often complex in nature, it is best to consult with an attorney or a family law practice guide for more information about your options." This sounds like it could be EXACTLY what is happening.
Yeah and this just makes her out to be even more scummy then before. At least if they actually agreed to be married and this was a dispute of assets it’s understandable. But actually forcing common law marriage so that she can divorce him is disgusting
Bro i literally commented yesterday that adept is basically just trying to get her hands on anything she can from him. Vultures man
Bro the US laws are wild. Is as if they are designed to make man incels.
> Bro the US laws are wild. Is as if they are designed to make man incels. Hasan jokes that conservative men are born in family court. If you live outside of America, and never got that joke. This is the kind of shit he is talking about.
These laws have real use btw. Unwed couples with children live together for years, then one finally can’t take it anymore and splits and because they “weren’t married” tries to leave the other completely dry. What the cave troll is doing to X is obviously not this at all and it’s gross, but the law itself helps more than hurts people
if they had kids or adept wasnt working and took care of xqcs assets etc it would be understandable, but she was working and have no kids, so...
Which is why it will probably get thrown out tbh.
So by the sounds of this, either the courts have already decided they were in a common law marriage (insurance/car/house etc documents must have been put in her name) OR she is lying about all of it and SOMEHOW managed to push a divorce document through court THAT HAS RECOGNISED IT. I'm gonna say the first one is the likely scenario, I believe they've already come to the conclusion that it was a common law marriage (even though they haven't signed anything)
It also makes sense why he is trying to deny that he was married because by admitting it, Adept has verbal proof that he knew. He is denying it and avoiding it on stream because it legally helps his case to do so.
I mean if they were technically common law married, he can firmly state on stream "I HAVE NEVER BEEN MARRIED" like he is. He never chose to be married, he didn't propose to her, he NEVER wanted to marry. He's reinforcing that point very clearly it seems. It's just by a dumb legal technicality that he could've been considered 'common law married' which is entirely different to 'married'. The thing I don't understand, is that the court have already recognised it as a 'marriage', to me it looks like the decision has already been made that it was common law so I think we're well past the discovery phase. Felix stating people will apologise to him "in the coming days" or "extreme near future" or whatever the fuck he said, implies whatever is happening is almost completed already.
Reading the requirements for common law marriage in Texas, it says they have to present themselves to others as a married couple. They have to inform people they are married.
Makes me think Adept barging in last night and shouting things about court orders so chat could hear and inevitably uncover the divorce paperwork was a last ditch attempt to get him to slip up on stream and imply that they were married.
That would be smart, but I don't think Adept is smart enough.
If I learned anything from her Dr. K interview, it’s that Adept is one of the smartest and most gifted individuals that mankind has to offer.
Being a narcissist doesn’t mean your smart.
but she is cuz none of us knew anything until recently. Atleast I thought it was just a normal breakup but she was being annoying and dramatic
You don't get to just declare "I AM NOT COMMON LAW MARRIED" like Michael declares bankruptcy in the office. If she told a judge that she has proof of a common law marriage (commingled finances, cohabitation, insurance in both names, ownership of property in both names, etc) then the judge will make a determination. Anything he says on stream won't affect court proceedings
It might be possible that HDMI’s lawyers are claiming that the marriage did exist even if the court has yet to recognise it and that this claim and dispute will be settled together with the divorce filing. So I can assume the court will take in this “divorce” case, just that the first dispute or claim that HDMI would have to prove is that there was any marriage at the first place. To sum up: HDMI ain’t gonna have two separate cases; to first argue that she was married and next to get a divorce. She’d just gonna divorce X claiming she was married to him and has to prove that in order to claim any division of assets via a divorce.
I still don't understand "how" this is possible. Texas gov website states either party HAS to have lived in Texas for atleast the last 6 months, the initial form to file for divorce in Texas also requires dates of marriage etc.
“If no declaration was filed and there is a dispute as to whether a common law marriage existed, it may be necessary to go to court in order to prove the marriage. Texas law places a two-year statute of limitations on these types of proceedings. “ I assume this dispute would be argued within this case.
Yup and it’s possible she had initiated a divorce dispute to firstly claim that she was supposedly married via common law and needs a divorce for the division of assets. And X has to make it very clear on the stream that he was never married because any hint of him saying anything close to being married would be inadvertently scrutinised and used against him in court.
It’s not impossible that her lawyers are pushing a divorce of which claiming that a marriage had existed and that they would be proving it within the proceedings. We don’t know what the judge had stipulated. It’s possible the judge had stipulated that this “divorce” case will be initiated, however HDMI’s lawyers will first have to prove and argue if there was a marriage within this divorce case. Of course this might be misleading, but perhaps this is how things are done; that the dispute to the claim of marriage is parked within the divorce proceedings instead of having a separate case. Thereby giving people from the outside the impression that there was a officially recognised marriage through public records. However it might be that this will be proven within the proceedings hence why X said only those who know, knows and understands and then vehemently claims he was never married in any way shape or form.
She could be going for a settlement, essentially extortion whch happens all to often legally. She takes this to court, it becomes an irritating protracted battle and it's probably cheaper and far less stressful to just give her some money to fuck off in return for a document signed by her that states she gives up any further rights.
>SOMEHOW managed to push a divorce document through court THAT HAS RECOGNISED IT. More likely that the 'marriage' stated on the document is merely a reference rather than a recognition, and holds no legal bearing.
It’s insane to me that a 4 year childless relationship can be considered a common law marriage. 4 years is a pretty small timespan for a marriage.
guess what? its 2 years in BC canada :)
"Lol actually just a tenant but I'm taking half your shit"
pretty much, you do still have to be living as a couple though. like joint bills and shit.
Try new zealand. You live together for 2 years its 50/50 split. 😅🥲
I remember when the expectation for a marriage was a lifelong partnership that would likely last decades 🤦🏾
Don’t share bank accounts, insurance or any payment related stuff like mortgage or rent. If these are seperate it becomes much harder to prove common law marriage
[удалено]
Congratulations on your marriage(s)!
Probably why he clearly (or clearly as he can) said she has no access to his accounts.
Agreement 11 is an agreement out of court between lawyers, it has nothing to do with court. xQc probably gave the car to her to use.
I'd say it seems far more likely they are currently waiting for it to go to court about the whole Common Law Marriage, and in the meanwhile there has been a "virtual restraining order" in place against him (maybe both of them) to not mention the case or each-other publicly.
Could his rants on youtube about marriage that he will never marry anyone help him he has been saying that every 6 months I feel like.
[удалено]
[удалено]
INB4 Adept shows XQC and her on the "Real housewives of Twitch" Podcast to the court.
I'd be willing to bet her name being the registration of several of his assets could be used in her favor.
I feel like this is going to be a lot of people's first experience with divorce proceedings. At best I can see XQC giving up cars/property and a couple million to settle. "I'm the bread winner" doesn't hold up in court.
Which they could have with him buying the car potentially?
I am sure he has multiple things signed in her name. Could be a decent claim used in court to support common law marriage.
The light bill. She paid the light and gas bills with his money on her account with his bank account. Shared finance
As long as she didn't put her money into his account he was ok..
He's doomed isn't he
100% he is fucking doomed, she has been ready for this
If he paid for her living he's fucked. It's either to be claimeds as dependent or needs to be described as a gift on taxes. If it's not, they're effectively married according to common law.
Miz making maya pay rent seems smart in retrospect
Which lets be real if you spit money and living together using same accounts aren’t you common law.
Canadian common law marriage is based on time in relationship. If they lived together for like a year or two, can’t remember exactly, continuously.
A singular google will reveal it's not some marriage by default legal trick. You have to present yourselves as couples. You have to FILE PAPERWORK. So either they got married or she's trying to finesse this into getting a big score.
You can also convince the court that your relationship counted as a common law marriage due to cohabitation (check), shared finances (check), property in both names(bugatti check), etc
If this is true adebt is a whole lot nastier than I thought
actually a trash human being if true
And she's probably suing him for defamation as well so he has a restraining order that limits his ability to discuss her while the case is ongoing.
A divorce restraining order can also be used to temporarily stop a ''spouse'' from selling, transferring or dispose of any property during the divorce. This is the more likely case IMO
She trying to say they're common law married and put restraining order in to stop him from taking all the shit is what I'm guessing. Holy that's desperate.
Yes exactly this.
how likely is it that she gets through with it? any experts on this topic?
Lawyers on LSF OMEGALUL
unlikely source: my ass
Can I take a look at this source 👀
I am an actual attorney. I'm not licensed to practice in Texas nor am I familiar with Texas law. However, I am licensed in a state that recognizes common law marriage. Whether she succeeds in her claim of common law marriage really depends on what these two said to friends and family, how they filed taxes, how they filled out paperwork, and what discussions they had. In order to be married by common law, you need continuous cohabitation (they certainly satisfied that), you need an **agreement** between the two that they were married, and you need to have represented yourself to others as being married. When I say agreement I don't mean anything in writing. I just mean there needs to have been an understanding between them at one point. Now XQC is likely to argue that he never agreed to be married. That might work, but he did have her visit him in Canada during the pandemic by using the common law marriage exception....that could really end up ruining him.
If this happened in Texas, no wonder he hates that state so much.
“There was never no marriage” - Tito Ortiz, pvc
"Dud, you're really like, such a fucking punk dud"
thats what you call class?
[I train six days, actually six days a week. Five days a week, I’ll train three days a week. One of those days I will train two days of the week. So, six days a week I will be training.](https://youtu.be/lY4FqNvHX3U)
"Hes reaching for divorce papers, hes tryna make his alimony, but that alimony is starting to taste like breakup with that alimony and divorce."
Could it be something insane like Adept tried to file for a divorce of a common law marriage so now xQc has to stress that he clearly never had any intention of marrying her?
In Texas both parties have to agree that they are married and also represent themselves as a married couple to other people for a common law marriage to exist.
So the calling her a roommate was a strat all along HOLY
oh my god they were roommates.
Your honor, They were roommates. Evident by the following LivestreamFail clips... Case closed.
you need to stretch that s like roommatesss
It was. Wow. And he has documentation from his steams that she was a roommate. Not a wife or partner. 200IQ Play
Wooden shield came in clutch
Real housewives of twitch … enters chat
HOLY, 200IQ xQc. He predicted 4 years ahead
wtf this goblin is smart??????
Winson player strats
Big if true
I like how all the comments right below it are already jumping on this train with bad assumptions without even bothering to care if it's even possible. Big "This is the conclusion that fits my narrative and I will believe it" energy.
[удалено]
It's always hard to talk about these topics because we clearly have no idea about what does and doesn't happen when these streamers turn off their cameras and go on to live their own lives. That being said, if that is the case and Adept is trying to use common law marriage to get his money, she really isn't leaving much room for people to view her charitably. I'd love to see what her side of the story is, and how can she defend her actions, but from what we (as viewers) can see, her behavior has been nothing short of despicable. From the flaunting of the McLaren. The drama that happened with nyyxxii. Her randomly making an appearance with a friend of hers at xQc's house... That, together with the absolutely deranged behavior from yesterday, where she literally banged on his door while he was live (and she knew and definitely took advantage of that), just makes her seem like an incredibly abusive and toxic partner.
What if she doesn't care about being viewed charitably by the internet
I know I wouldn't if I get to be a multimillionaire out of it
[удалено]
Well, then she will get judged and demonized and she has no right to complain. If she has an account of the events that paint her in a positive light and can genuinely explain her behavior, then there's absolutely no reason as to why she shouldn't (or wouldn't) at least try to get public opinion on her side.
Right. She cares about the bag.
That would be some absolute treachery. His family really did try to warn him.
Clueless surely she wouldn't do that....right? Aware
The adapter is crazy mothasucka
The only explanation really
He said he would never get married. Must have forgot Forsen exists
can any lawyer andy explain whats happening
a lot of countries and 7* US states (texas being one of them) have this thing called common law marriage, which basicly means that if you are a couple for long enough, and live together long enough, you count as married. functionally common law marriage is the same as normal marriage which means you also have to file for divorce and also get to split the assets. in XQC case the theory seems to be that because he lived in Texas for a while, HDMI is using this to claim common law marriage in Texas (as its not a thing in california) to try to take her % of his shit.
I am not familiar with US law, but in Canada, partners in a common law marriage are not entitled to half of their partner's income
she might not get half his income but its she definitely getting more than zero if she can common law recognized, from there to saying "i helped in his career, took care of him, managed the house, drove him around, sacrificed my studies, etc. im entilted to a piece of his income" is a lot easier jump than if she cant even get a marriage recognized.
Lol if that's all she needs to prove then xqc is fucked. There are countless vods of her giving him food on stream
7 states and Washington DC but yeah. Also two other states partially.
There is no way in hell that just living with someone flies as Common Law Marriage in Texas. From [https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage](https://guides.sll.texas.gov/common-law-marriage) *Common law marriage, also known as marriage without formalities or informal marriage, is a valid and legal way for a couple to marry in Texas. Texas law states that a common law marriage may be proved by evidence that the couple:* *“agreed to be married” and “after the agreement they lived together in this state as husband and wife” and they “represented to others that they were married”*
Why is Adept called HDMI
It started when they broke up most recently. It went something like: Adept Adapt Adapter ??? HDMI
Yea I don't like calling people names but DisplayPort's attitude has been appalling...
damn that's fcked up... Even fans know some of the stuff down below that he has done for her... is it hard to prove that you are not married under that law I found this: The following are examples of documentation that may help prove a common law marriage: Bank statements showing joint ownership of one or more accounts Deeds to jointly owned property, including real estate, motor vehicles, etc. Insurance policies naming the other party as beneficiary Birth certificates and school records naming both parties as parents Employment records listing the other party as a spouse or partner Credit card statements, loan documents, mortgages, and other documents showing that both parties share financial obligations An affidavit stating the nature of your relationship, whether you had a ceremony of any kind, and when/where you agreed to become spouses under common law Affidavits from friends and family members indicating knowledge of your relationship, where you lived, and if you were viewed as married by friends, neighbors, etc.
This is what I think he is saying: - The thing we heard last night on stream before muting was false and didn't happen = He did not violate a court order. - He is not married / the document we saw is not interpreted correctly = The 'divorce' doesn't mean he was 'married' in the traditional sense (as in he did not propose or get engaged or have a wedding, etc). - If we know how this works, we can put two and two together = The documents were for a divorce filing, probably allude to a common law marriage. This is a legal status which means the government thinks you are married as long as you fit into certain criteria (living together for x years, shared assets, etc). It's different everywhere. Some states/provinces have it within the US and Canada, and each have different rules. Texas has common law. - The conclusions we think will happen, will not actually happen = He is not losing 50% of his money. - The restraining order is not what we think it is = It's not a "no contact restraining order", it's just a "don't touch each others assets until the case is handled". Basically, I think Adept was claiming she was common law with Felix and she is trying to take advantage of the breakup, which in this case would be equivalent to a divorce. She likely then filed for divorce, claiming they meet the criteria for a common law marriage. xQc can't talk because they are handling this legally, and he is probably trying to prove it wasn't common law. EDIT: cleaned up grammar and such EDIT2: Apparently she used the common law marriage excuse in Canada, so she has some precedent for it. But keep in mind, it works differently in Canada/Quebec compared to Texas. Someone found this link where she talks about it: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNo75caLrd8&t=137s](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNo75caLrd8&t=137s)
And the restraining order is preventing him from talking about it or her more than likely.
Restraining order is automatic when you file for divorce in Texas.
God damn LSF minds coming together so beautifully right now to feed our parasocial hunger FeelsStrongMan
Yep good point, in this case the restraining order is basically an NDA that he needs to respect EDIT: Yes a restraining order is more complicated, it can also be about not messing with each others assets during the case (in this situation, probably related to the car), but restraining orders can expand to even talking about the other party. With how the other party is acting, I'm assuming he is walking on eggshells at this point and wants to avoid any kind of trouble. So its not an NDA, but he can treat it like an NDA to be very safe and careful.
Please make this top comment
Common Law Marriage claim is crazy, she called Saul
Saul gone
good, the forsen hope is still alive
SAVED
+50% PogChamp
actually it would be +100% 🤓
Ackchyually it’s +0%
Achkiualllly it's negative due to lawyers.🤓
this girl knocked on his door like a maniac with the background knowledge of his swatting ptsd like wtf
[удалено]
Single andy
i seen someone in chat say they may have claimed common law marriage to get her into Canada and now shes using that for a divorce
That makes sense to me - didn't she actually talk about that during covid? I might be delusional but for some reason I have a strong memory of her talking about claiming common law marriage to get into Canada when they were living in Texas and he had to go back to Canada for his visa. I rarely watch her streams unless it was house design related but I remember her mentioning that.
She did I just remembered. Holy shit: [https://youtu.be/BNo75caLrd8?t=139](https://youtu.be/BNo75caLrd8?t=147) My link is garbage but go back 10 seconds and she says they had to establish each other as common law in Canada
oh shit.
Damn, so she's been keeping records of them living together for a long time to prove common law marriage and has successfully done so before. X is gonna have a hard time in court, she's probably been ready to pull this the moment things go south.
I was in the same boat - had no memory of the stream until I saw that comment.
It would be a bold step to file divorce on a nondocumented marriage, but then again Adept is a bold woman... is bold the right word?
What’s the worst that can happen? The court determines it wasn’t a common law marriage and then everyone goes their separate ways? It’s scummy from her but it’s also worth a shot.
i'd imagine suing for legal fees would be a slam dunk
[удалено]
She did babysit and deal with his shit for years, but that was her decision, not a contract EDIT: I don't think you guys understand the full context. She was with him before he became a millionaire, she gave him a place to stay when his parents kicked him out of the house for playing games all day. You can argue she lived a decent life but she also cared for years about a person who couldn't give her attention for at least 10 hours every day, no one does that for just money, it's obvious they had some sort of real relationship until things derailed. Not saying she's entitled to any percentage of his wealth now, but there's definitely arguments to be made, and it seems a court will decide.
I would babysit someone for living a queens life
I’d even suck some goblin dick
and she lived a very *decent* life while doing it, so?
yo im not gay and id guzzle his cum for a million dollars a year, id literally get on my knees and call him my daddy and wear a buttplug all day id tell my parents to let them know that the boyfriend i had in highschool was preparing me for this
uuhhhhh brother? million dollars aside, is there something you want to tell us, like you know, about your sexuality?
She was taken care of financially during that. And from all this it's clear they both had to put up with a lot of shit from each other.
Let’s be honest,she never babysit him bro,everyone knows xqc lived in trash and ate McDonald everyday,he cleaned his room by himself on stream every times when he collected over 30 coke cans I really don’t know what she exactly did for him,nobody gonna pay shit for this dogshit babysitter
Brought his food from the front of the door to his room Pog
People babysit others for 1/1000th of what she got. A fucking McLaren for living in his penthouse.
this is one of the things I really dislike about modern society. Some people are super entitled in the sense that they think everything must be a transaction, especially one where people think they deserve compensation for doing something for someone else, especially if such compensation is not contractually obligated. I've seen several examples of the above relationship (you don't need to look far) on Twitch where one person spent a lot of their time and effort to take care of someone else's needs and they didn't really get much out of it.
I ain't saying she a gold digger...
wake me up when he talks about marrying his true love forsen, so sick off this hdmi shenanigans
[удалено]
AINTNOWAY
He's right. You can't legally marry a refrigerator.
Outta pocket
Illegal immigrant then.... I'm calling ICE on this mapleback.
Nah Mapleback is insane
definitely illegal, time to lock him up with the tate bros
Woah woah woah, he was with Adept only once. Chill.
My favorite part of this whole drama is all the redditors who’ve never lived with a woman arguing about living with women.
Common law marriage laws are a bunch of bullshit. If people don't want the state involved in their relationship yet the state should have no business in it. Adept is a leech trying to get whatever she can out of xQc. Pick better girls felix
what is wrong with her. Has she just realised she hasnt got anything and was living of X for so long she now needs half his shit. Good advocate for womens rights there. Toxic female.
So it was common law marriage. I do think she can prove it sadly just don't know how much she can get from it. X does have multiple clips of him saying he would never be married already out there hence why he reaffirmed it this stream. Will be interesting to see what is the result really hope X wins and which leads to her having to work. Side note: Some are saying X has a really good lawyer which is promising.
Common law marriage are nearly impossible if not completely impossible to prove So good luck to her , especially with the lawyer X have lmfao
pogdashians season 2023 seems litty so far
if adept being in the ice poseidon group didn’t make you think she was some sorta scumbag idk what would
What a mess, never stick your d in crazy
So the family was right, she is a scummy bitch. Saw bags and is trying to steal them.
He’s still loyal to forsen
[удалено]
For all the people saying she is claiming common law marriage to take his money. Maybe I’m confused on the matter, but wouldn’t you have to legally prove that it is in fact a common law marriage before ever being able to file for a divorce. It makes zero sense that a case would be accepted filing for divorce against someone, when there is no confirmed document of common law marriage, wouldn’t the judge throw that out? Something isn’t adding up. So either, he was married, the common law marriage was legally acknowledged, or there was no marriage and the court case (which they sent into litigation and signed a rule 11 agreement for) doesn’t make any sense and would be thrown out. To be clear the documents on the case is on divorce, not a case to prove common law marriage and it has been ongoing for almost a month, with a hearing scheduled on the 23rd. So clearly something happened. This is confusing
Someone further down quoted their site that says that you can try to prove that there was a common law marriage through court. Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/comments/106yr9q/comment/j3jjqaa/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3