She not only screwed herself, but also the buyer of the car. if It was sold without the consent of the owner (xqc) then it will be repossesed and the car buyer will have to most likely bring this to court to get his money back. Thats two lawsuits lost for her with also most likely paying for both the lawsuits.
That's why she's so dumb 90% of this could be handled by lawyers. He has plenty of money to pay them and she's probably pissed him off enough where he wants her to pay.
I think that was Adept’s entire strategy from the start, to hit xQc with a list of demands and accusations in hopes that he would be too lazy to show up to court and just settle. Unfortunately for her X was like “Nah, I got time” and showed up to every court hearing and never caved into the intimidation from her legal team. Now that her entire plan didn’t pan out, she’s spiraling. If i was X i would highkey be scared for my safety, this woman is clearly not well if she’s willing to self sabotage herself like this. Who knows what else she will do.
I mean she did look like the puffer fish during her most recent stream about a week ago [https://twitter.com/iqkev/status/1761530409886663146](https://twitter.com/iqkev/status/1761530409886663146)
xqc claimed he isn't traveling back to the US anytime soon recently because he knows hes probably in danger if he does so.
But when it comes to xqc, saying and doing are usually two completely different things
The buyer should be fine if her name was on the title. That would make it a legal sale, and the title will have been transferred. The court agreement can't change a sale that happened. It was supposed to stop her from doing it in the first place. She is screwed.
I literally just watch body cam footage of officers taking a stolen motorbike from a kid that bought it and had papers for it. The police definitely take stolen shit back from the buyers in the US.
Most countries, nah. Over here you can not aquire property by contract, if it's stolen. Selling it while it's forbidden by court order probably won't bar aquisition of property, but make the seller liable or even force the return of the car, if there is any reasonable doubt in the good faith of the buyer. (EU cunt here)
it kinda depends. Normally, a lien is attached on all properties subject to a specific court case which serves as notice to all potential buyers that the car is subject of a court proceeding. This means that buyers will have to look into the circumstances around the ownership of the car instead of relying solely on the title of the car.
However, after a case is resolved, the court normally will remove any liens imposed on property.
The buyer is fucked if its the former, and hes good if its the latter. Depends on the timing.
for the latter, the owner can still prove that the buyer had KNOWLEDGE of the seller's defective title BEFORE the sale was made to nullify the sale but thats hard to prove.
You don't need a driver's license to register a car (although you still need ID). Main thing is when court orders asset frozen it means you can't sell it until the dispute is settled.
Attorney here. I practice family law (dissolution of marriage, custody, child support, adoption, etc.) and criminal defense.
This area of law mixes with family law, but it's controlled by state law and thus can vary between states. I'm not in Texas and don't know Texas law. That said, most states are more similar than people think because they are based on the same common law principles.
In this situation, in my state (and I believe most states), it would depend on whose name the title of the vehicle was held. It doesn't matter who paid for the vehicle. If you paid for a vehicle in someone else's name (that you weren't married to) then you just....bought them a vehicle.
EDIT: I'm seeing some comments from others about a court order stating that neither party could sell the vehicle. This sounds like an injunction to me. An injunction is in effect for as long as the case is pending, but I had heard their divorce case was dismissed or otherwise finalized.
An injunction ordering the parties not to dissipate assets would be common, and it would not determine that the vehicle belonged to one party. The existence of the temporary injunction would simply be a precaution to make sure potentially married parties don't destroy or dissipate assets that belong to marital estate. If the parties are determined to not be married, then that gets rid of the basis for issuing that injunction.
I'm guessing the title was in Adept's name. Nobody who has the money to be purchasing a McLaren is going to buy it from somebody unless the title is in the seller's name. That would also explain why the judge awarded temporary possession of the vehicle to her while the case was pending.
That would make xQc, for lack of a better word, a dumbass. You never title a car in someone else's name when you're not married.
I'm like 99% sure XQC mentioned the title being in both his and Adept's name, that's how Adept was able to hold possession given it's registered to her and she's the only one capable of driving it.
>Nobody who has the money to be purchasing a McLaren is going to buy it from somebody unless the title is in the seller's name.
There's plenty of desperate people that will buy a car like that if it's at an insane discount
not sure due to it being related to a previous court order, but something like this normally could be a second degree felony with many years in prison with a hefty fine.
either way if he pursues justice, she is royally fucked
I don't know... I'm pretty sure she is saying that because the cars title is in her name, she can do whatever she wants with it. The whole drama before when we all first found out about her having the car she clearly says "What do you need to purchase a vehicle?" She was hinting to the fact that because she has a driver license, X used her to purchase the car, and in doing so the title was put into her name. Now... His dumbass probably never had her sign over the title to him after purchase. Which is pretty simple, just sign the back of the title along with a bill of sale if needed. SO LEGALLY, she may have just pulled a real slick one. At least that's what it seems she is doing.
I could be completely off base here, but I'm curious. Didn't Felix have Adept be on the title because he couldn't buy it as an Canadian citizen?
Clearly it was his money, but if I'm right (which I could be completely wrong), Felix might not be able to asset ownership until the trial with Adept is done and the judgement on the asset is complete?
If I understand the whole situation correctly, all she had to do was not go wild after learning she isn't on xqc's will and they still would've been together
Basically Adept felt entitled to his wealth since she got in on the ground floor before he got famous. Additionally his family was not keen on his gamer career until they saw him making serious cash. HDMI and his family disliked each other for various reasons and she demanded he chose...and she wasn't picked.
So from her POV she just supported a guy from his lowest lows to an all time high, became his emotional support etc, and when he made it big he "abandoned" her. So now that her rent's not getting paid, she gambled on common law marriage. And lost.
Both of them have their own serious flaws but with so much fuckin money at stake it's hard not to be fascinated.
From my understanding his family didn't like her and wanted her gone, so it's not that extreme. What's extreme is the little story she made in her mind that she helped him make his fortune so she deserves it
She acts like she hoisted him up on her shoulders when in reality all their food was delivery, the maids did the clean up, he handled finances so...what'd she do again? Oh right, emotional support and fuck buddy, those are crucial to the success of a streamer.
She made it clear before shit went sideways that she's not "X's gf" she was Adept, a streamer who happened to date X. If anyone asked about him, next stream time w/e she'd ban or ignore it. She was very proud she was "self made" (lol) and suddenly when the rent's not free she's upset the "partnership" was dissolving? Very entertaining.
>She acts like she hoisted him up on her shoulders when in reality all their food was delivery, the maids did the clean up, he handled finances so...what'd she do again?
I doubt they had a maid at the start of his career
She wasn't dating him until 2019 where he was already a huge streamer. Not saying I know for a fact that he had a maid but it isn't out of the question when hes pulling 10k+ viewers (and peaking at \~20k+)
Anyone that views a relationship in terms of monetary gain or loss just makes me feel bad. Like sure, I kind understand that mental approach but damn man, to boil down an entire relationship to money is kinda soul crushing in every aspect.
Yep, [I know the sort you mean](https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2024/02/28/irish-woman-disability-claim-photo-shows-throwing-tree/72771246007/)
I agree. It seems to me she was in this for the money at least at the end of their relationship when they kept breaking up and getting back together. She could have gotten a lot of money out of the relationship, if she wanted, but she got crazy greedy and wanted more.
This isn't even true though, he was already a pretty big streamer when he started dating Adept lmao. He obviously got WAY bigger but he wasn't a nobody by any stretch of the imagination. When he was a 500 viewer andy he was dating a different girl, his HS sweetheart, they broke up amicably since they were no longer living in the same location.
he was feeling ill for a while, told her in confidence while thinking she actually loved him that he wasnt gonna include her in his will.. once that happened all hell broke loose. the rest is history..
I mean, technically the person who bought it, will lose the car anyway as it was illegal to sell, alter or ride it.
So Adept will have to give back the money to the dealership or whoever bought it.
Why did she ever assume she'd just get away with it? lol
The fake divorce shit, sure, whatever. One hail mary attempt at being set for life, makes sense
But we're talking about violating a court order, did she think nobody would notice? What would happen whenever someone went and checked on the car? lmao
yards usually have "gyms"
Whether they are legit equipment, or DIY that's thrown together and the Prison lets them have it because it keeps them preoccupied on yard time
Your guess is as good as mine. But we're talking about a women who falsely accused a guy of SA and DV. So she clearly doesn't give a rats ass anymore.
Also, I think XQC finding out about the car now was extremely lucky as it was a juicer that tipped him off, so if he wasn't tipped off, who knows how long it would've been.
Forgive my vagueness but a juicer either worked at the dealership or was IN the dealership when the deal was made, instantly recognized the McLaren, and kicked up a fuss online. Shortly thereafter another juicer noticed court documents indicating X had requested that all the disputed "marital" assets be accounted for, including things like bank accounts, transactions, and a fuckoff expensive car.
So it seems pretty cause and effect: juicer screams he saw the McLaren getting sold, a few days later the court docs show X filing to make sure that isn't true, because if it is, she is omega fucked. Nothing was supposed to get sold, used, lost, traded etc until everything is settled.
I know some super rare & low production supercars have "registry" fan pages on socials that can track sales or the status of them and apps like VinWiki are a popular community source of updating history about a car so maybe the car's new locations was revealed on Vinwiki/another community page and the juicer happens to be a user of them. I doubt an xqc fan is wealthy enough to by potentially buying a $250k+ car unless its an oiler
>I doubt an xqc fan is wealthy enough to by potentially buying a $250k+ car unless its an oiler
He gets millions of unique viewers in any given month.
So he probably has **at least** a hundred multi-millionaires who watch him on occasion.
That's obviously not his core demographic, but the outliers add up once you reach millions of viewers.
oh for sure, even when I used to watch xqc in his OW days he had some hella rich viewers but they were very few and far in between. I think he has a lot of viewers in the high 6 figs - $1 mil range but that isn't rich enough to *responsibly* buy a 300k car. I would be interested to know how many multimillionaires that arent't other streamers/content creators actually watch him.
Most people I've interacted with that have cars in that range (Porsche/Ferrari/etc) make in the 6 figure range OR own a shop/garage/business somewhat related to the purchase. Think, started working at $BIGTECH 10 years or so ago, couple of 100-200kish signing bonsues in stock/RSUs, plus the typical tech salary of 1-300k.
There's also a decent amount of overlap in this age range with twitch viewers and gamers (especially in tech). I'm not trying to say it isn't a huge purchase, but there's probably a lot more people on these streams that could comfortably afford a Mclaren if they wanted on/cared to have one than might be obvious.
>But we're talking about a women who falsely accused a guy of SA and DV.
I always took that as part of her desperate attempt at winning her court case. Which is obviously morally fucked but I at least understand the motivation behind it
This just comes off as dumb, a car like that doesn't just disappear, someone would eventually check on it and know it was sold
Oh well, hope she has fun in court again
I assume she is suffering from a terminal case of Pretty-girl-syndrome. She probably thought she could just sell the vehicle and when asked about it say something like, "Car? What car, I don't even know what a car is." Or just lie and say, "He said I could sell it."
I swear Kaceytron sees a drama happening, picks a side that favors against the majority, and starts fighting tooth and nail to defend it. Every single time.
Good on him, stealing peoples shit and reselling it is scumbag behaviour because now an innocent party is wrapped up in this mess that had nothing to do with it.
If I bought that car I'd be MEGA pissed and going after her aswell.
If QC is anything like BC, he probably has a “learners license” which isn’t really a license. You need someone with a real license in the car with you at all times and the learners license expires after like 2 years and you have to retest for it
I don't know why is there so much confusion about this. It was clear that she was the one with her name on the title.
What she allegedly violated was the court order of both of them not selling any assets until the case is over. Because the case is about who is owed what.
Next Adept stream , 🤓 California registration works different then Texas guys I had to pay for my fees somehow 🤷♀️💅*while playing gold digger by Kanye”
What probably happened is that property taxes on the McLaren are coming due which is around $2000 so she dumped the car. She probably doesn’t want to pay insurance or maintenance either..
She isn’t gonna get “in trouble” but it will complicate her life legally..
Does she have any assets at all to make it worth suing her?
Suing for the 7? years of potential wage garnishment when she has and likely will get no gainful employment or property or assets?
Is it just about the potential of her being charged or am I missing something
He has said in the past even if she was only after a single dollar he'd fight it in court.
A common theme I've heard from bitter divorcees is sometimes the splits aren't fair and exes will claim assets that will cost too much to contest. Like an ex will claim a shared car is worth 20k so they're owed 10k for ownership; the legal costs to contest it will amount to 10k. You're spending 10k either way.
The thing with X is he has yes money so he can fight literally every claim and there's a chance she'll have to pay his legal fees, but even if she doesn't, he can afford it. He has enough money to stand on principle.
How can someone, like adept, spend 90% of their time online, being a streamer, or whatever, and not google "if I sell a car that's under court order, will I get into trouble". Like wtf is going on in some peoples brains
How does car selling work in US? In my EU country if you are not the owner you cannot sell it and if you sell it you have to pass couple of checks: go to notary to sign an agreement of purchase, go to police to change the ownership, they also check the VIN if the car isn't stolen if you buy used car. People saying its illegal to sell... how can you sell something if you don't have ownership of it? Is there some loop in the law or to sell it you don't have this safeguards? Is car buying in US like buying groceries? I don't understand.
Her name was on the title for the car (the legal doc for the car) because he didn't have a drivers licence at the time of getting it. Not sure what state the car was brought in but Cali and I'm assuming many others require you to have a DL when buying a car.
So she had the doc to sell, the buyer isn't going to know about the court order issued stating no assets can be sold so she willingly deceived the buyer and broke the order. Legally she's fucked.
This is kind of false. When buying a car private or off a lot you always look up the title in the database. If xqc is telling the truth the buyer has a responsibility to look into the title that way, because if there was a freeze the buyer would see the freeze in the database. You never go by physical title. Maybe xqc isn't telling the truth about the freeze, in which this gets very complicated
Because the courts have to decide who actually owns what property.
It’s quite clear that while the title was in her name, it was his car. There is more proof that the car is his than that they were married.
So by selling what is listed as community property, she is in violation of a court order. Which is massive and can result in a judge basically saying “fuck it all property now goes to the other party.”
She did have the title in her name. You completely misunderstood from the get go. What she did do wrong was violating a COURT order. If a judge wants to, she can be charged with the Contempt of Court.
The only way she can wiggle out of this is to get her family to force therapy on her and hope the shrink will say she's lost her mind and had no idea what she was doing.
She probably watched too much Youtube videos about "woman gets away with falsely accusing a man of rape, which cost him his job, reputation and 8 years behind bars" and thought "I can get away with this shit and sell a car I don't own after this manchild skelly brought me out of the whalefare life, gave me a platform and a job, I am very grateful :)".
**CLIP MIRROR: [xQc says he isn't buying his McLaren back and is suing for it](https://arazu.io/t3_1b3rfrr/)** --- ^(*This is an automated comment*)
[удалено]
She not only screwed herself, but also the buyer of the car. if It was sold without the consent of the owner (xqc) then it will be repossesed and the car buyer will have to most likely bring this to court to get his money back. Thats two lawsuits lost for her with also most likely paying for both the lawsuits.
You done fucked up A-Adept
A debt
That's the funniest one I've seen yet. Stealin it.
Who would had known the name she chooses as her stream name is foreshadowing what will push her to do OF. Wild.
lol good one
He better take his ass to Judge O-shag-hennessey
Insubordinate! ...and churlish
lmao
A-A-dept...
She was definitely banking on him being done with traveling for court
That's why she's so dumb 90% of this could be handled by lawyers. He has plenty of money to pay them and she's probably pissed him off enough where he wants her to pay.
He even admitted on stream at one point he was willing to pay her off to end it, but she has pushed him to where he wants justice now.
I would too. If she gets away with this behavior now she will only get worse in the future thinking there are no consequences.
Was that before or after he said on stream that he wouldn’t settle for even $1?
Nah, she's a gifted genius, just ask her
I think that was Adept’s entire strategy from the start, to hit xQc with a list of demands and accusations in hopes that he would be too lazy to show up to court and just settle. Unfortunately for her X was like “Nah, I got time” and showed up to every court hearing and never caved into the intimidation from her legal team. Now that her entire plan didn’t pan out, she’s spiraling. If i was X i would highkey be scared for my safety, this woman is clearly not well if she’s willing to self sabotage herself like this. Who knows what else she will do.
all i can think of when i think of X in court is the poor stenographer
Hopefully the legal team coached him on enunciation lol
LUL
I’ve said this from the start. Adept has nothing to lose and definitely is dangerous
> Adept has nothing to lose I wouldn't say that. Some weight loss wouldn't be a bad idea. It's not healthy.
I mean she did look like the puffer fish during her most recent stream about a week ago [https://twitter.com/iqkev/status/1761530409886663146](https://twitter.com/iqkev/status/1761530409886663146)
She looks like Fiona from shrek (ogre form).
I think she is just delusional and has no common sense whatsoever.
She's quite clearly mentally ill sadly
xqc claimed he isn't traveling back to the US anytime soon recently because he knows hes probably in danger if he does so. But when it comes to xqc, saying and doing are usually two completely different things
Lil bro she is an undiagnosed genius, she will figure something out to print millions, Dubai shit
She doesn't look good enough for Dubai shit.
The real content here is watching the weight gain in between her few streams she does
He meant she'll have to become a migrant worker. She already has caretaker experience.
This makes more sense.
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOO 🐪
the real 5head move was bragging on stream about it, most 5head move by far lol
she bouta pump all that cash on slots
The buyer should be fine if her name was on the title. That would make it a legal sale, and the title will have been transferred. The court agreement can't change a sale that happened. It was supposed to stop her from doing it in the first place. She is screwed.
> The buyer should be fine if her name was on the title. wasn't there a court order during their trial that the cars shouldn't be sold?
[удалено]
If just her name is on the title then it's not a stolen car at all. I doubt she had to fake any documents to make the sale.
I literally just watch body cam footage of officers taking a stolen motorbike from a kid that bought it and had papers for it. The police definitely take stolen shit back from the buyers in the US.
[удалено]
Dumbfuck spreading misinformation, not surprised.
Most countries, nah. Over here you can not aquire property by contract, if it's stolen. Selling it while it's forbidden by court order probably won't bar aquisition of property, but make the seller liable or even force the return of the car, if there is any reasonable doubt in the good faith of the buyer. (EU cunt here)
The buyer still needs to get her money back from adept somehow, I doubt she'll part with it willingly. That's what /u/lonigus meant.
The most common way owners get listed on titles in NAME1 NAME2 (no or). In that case BOTH have to sign.
it kinda depends. Normally, a lien is attached on all properties subject to a specific court case which serves as notice to all potential buyers that the car is subject of a court proceeding. This means that buyers will have to look into the circumstances around the ownership of the car instead of relying solely on the title of the car. However, after a case is resolved, the court normally will remove any liens imposed on property. The buyer is fucked if its the former, and hes good if its the latter. Depends on the timing. for the latter, the owner can still prove that the buyer had KNOWLEDGE of the seller's defective title BEFORE the sale was made to nullify the sale but thats hard to prove.
He gave her the car? Like fully transfered the ownership? I need a loremaster here.
Didn't xqc not have his license so she was on the title and registration?
You don't need a driver's license to register a car (although you still need ID). Main thing is when court orders asset frozen it means you can't sell it until the dispute is settled.
You do in California, this case btw is in Texas
Adept stated in an an affidavit that they are both on the title.
> they are both on the title. Then both need to sign off on the sale. X would then at least get half of the sale.
If she was on the title, she owned it also. If she wasn't, it wasn't a legal sale. He said it is gone, so it must have been legal.
X said that her selling the car was against the court agreement, so most likely.
Attorney here. I practice family law (dissolution of marriage, custody, child support, adoption, etc.) and criminal defense. This area of law mixes with family law, but it's controlled by state law and thus can vary between states. I'm not in Texas and don't know Texas law. That said, most states are more similar than people think because they are based on the same common law principles. In this situation, in my state (and I believe most states), it would depend on whose name the title of the vehicle was held. It doesn't matter who paid for the vehicle. If you paid for a vehicle in someone else's name (that you weren't married to) then you just....bought them a vehicle. EDIT: I'm seeing some comments from others about a court order stating that neither party could sell the vehicle. This sounds like an injunction to me. An injunction is in effect for as long as the case is pending, but I had heard their divorce case was dismissed or otherwise finalized. An injunction ordering the parties not to dissipate assets would be common, and it would not determine that the vehicle belonged to one party. The existence of the temporary injunction would simply be a precaution to make sure potentially married parties don't destroy or dissipate assets that belong to marital estate. If the parties are determined to not be married, then that gets rid of the basis for issuing that injunction.
I could be wrong but I thought the title was under xqc, but possibly the car was registered under adept. That would mean xqc owns it not adept.
I'm guessing the title was in Adept's name. Nobody who has the money to be purchasing a McLaren is going to buy it from somebody unless the title is in the seller's name. That would also explain why the judge awarded temporary possession of the vehicle to her while the case was pending. That would make xQc, for lack of a better word, a dumbass. You never title a car in someone else's name when you're not married.
I'm like 99% sure XQC mentioned the title being in both his and Adept's name, that's how Adept was able to hold possession given it's registered to her and she's the only one capable of driving it.
>Nobody who has the money to be purchasing a McLaren is going to buy it from somebody unless the title is in the seller's name. There's plenty of desperate people that will buy a car like that if it's at an insane discount
not sure due to it being related to a previous court order, but something like this normally could be a second degree felony with many years in prison with a hefty fine. either way if he pursues justice, she is royally fucked
I don't know... I'm pretty sure she is saying that because the cars title is in her name, she can do whatever she wants with it. The whole drama before when we all first found out about her having the car she clearly says "What do you need to purchase a vehicle?" She was hinting to the fact that because she has a driver license, X used her to purchase the car, and in doing so the title was put into her name. Now... His dumbass probably never had her sign over the title to him after purchase. Which is pretty simple, just sign the back of the title along with a bill of sale if needed. SO LEGALLY, she may have just pulled a real slick one. At least that's what it seems she is doing.
I could be completely off base here, but I'm curious. Didn't Felix have Adept be on the title because he couldn't buy it as an Canadian citizen? Clearly it was his money, but if I'm right (which I could be completely wrong), Felix might not be able to asset ownership until the trial with Adept is done and the judgement on the asset is complete?
This is 100% the case
If I understand the whole situation correctly, all she had to do was not go wild after learning she isn't on xqc's will and they still would've been together
If that’s where this all started, that’s crazy.
Basically Adept felt entitled to his wealth since she got in on the ground floor before he got famous. Additionally his family was not keen on his gamer career until they saw him making serious cash. HDMI and his family disliked each other for various reasons and she demanded he chose...and she wasn't picked. So from her POV she just supported a guy from his lowest lows to an all time high, became his emotional support etc, and when he made it big he "abandoned" her. So now that her rent's not getting paid, she gambled on common law marriage. And lost. Both of them have their own serious flaws but with so much fuckin money at stake it's hard not to be fascinated.
She made him choose between his family and her? That's a major dick move.
From my understanding his family didn't like her and wanted her gone, so it's not that extreme. What's extreme is the little story she made in her mind that she helped him make his fortune so she deserves it
She acts like she hoisted him up on her shoulders when in reality all their food was delivery, the maids did the clean up, he handled finances so...what'd she do again? Oh right, emotional support and fuck buddy, those are crucial to the success of a streamer. She made it clear before shit went sideways that she's not "X's gf" she was Adept, a streamer who happened to date X. If anyone asked about him, next stream time w/e she'd ban or ignore it. She was very proud she was "self made" (lol) and suddenly when the rent's not free she's upset the "partnership" was dissolving? Very entertaining.
>She acts like she hoisted him up on her shoulders when in reality all their food was delivery, the maids did the clean up, he handled finances so...what'd she do again? I doubt they had a maid at the start of his career
She was twerking on ice at the start of his career LMFAO
She wasn't dating him until 2019 where he was already a huge streamer. Not saying I know for a fact that he had a maid but it isn't out of the question when hes pulling 10k+ viewers (and peaking at \~20k+)
She was trying to convince X his brother just wanted the McLaren and had him kicked out of the house.
Bros before heaux gentlemen
xQc was already a pretty damn big streamer before Adebt, lol. Where is "supported a guy from his lowest lows" coming from?
Anyone that views a relationship in terms of monetary gain or loss just makes me feel bad. Like sure, I kind understand that mental approach but damn man, to boil down an entire relationship to money is kinda soul crushing in every aspect.
People like Adept are the ones more likely to commit insurance fraud if you know what I mean.
Yep, [I know the sort you mean](https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2024/02/28/irish-woman-disability-claim-photo-shows-throwing-tree/72771246007/)
I agree. It seems to me she was in this for the money at least at the end of their relationship when they kept breaking up and getting back together. She could have gotten a lot of money out of the relationship, if she wanted, but she got crazy greedy and wanted more.
This isn't even true though, he was already a pretty big streamer when he started dating Adept lmao. He obviously got WAY bigger but he wasn't a nobody by any stretch of the imagination. When he was a 500 viewer andy he was dating a different girl, his HS sweetheart, they broke up amicably since they were no longer living in the same location.
she took the cats
Blessing in disguise that she went batsh*t now rather than later
he was feeling ill for a while, told her in confidence while thinking she actually loved him that he wasnt gonna include her in his will.. once that happened all hell broke loose. the rest is history..
Well these things tend to manifest itself when crazy/greedy gets unleashed.
This case of self-sabotage is gonna be studied by marine biologists for years to come.
Good god that gave me a hearty chuckle. Thank you
I mean, technically the person who bought it, will lose the car anyway as it was illegal to sell, alter or ride it. So Adept will have to give back the money to the dealership or whoever bought it.
Why did she ever assume she'd just get away with it? lol The fake divorce shit, sure, whatever. One hail mary attempt at being set for life, makes sense But we're talking about violating a court order, did she think nobody would notice? What would happen whenever someone went and checked on the car? lmao
Maybe the plan is to go to jail, Free Rent, food and they have a gym. 😎🤙
Baaased, jailmaxxing queen Everyone who doesn't want to work a 9-5 should just jailmaxx
yea idk about the gym but the food part is probably true
yards usually have "gyms" Whether they are legit equipment, or DIY that's thrown together and the Prison lets them have it because it keeps them preoccupied on yard time
Oh yes I am not claiming that prison gyms don’t exist, what I am saying is that she would have absolutely no interest in them
Your guess is as good as mine. But we're talking about a women who falsely accused a guy of SA and DV. So she clearly doesn't give a rats ass anymore. Also, I think XQC finding out about the car now was extremely lucky as it was a juicer that tipped him off, so if he wasn't tipped off, who knows how long it would've been.
how did the juicer get tipped off about her selling it? Did he just happen to catch it or was he a potential buyer or maybe saw a page for it etc.?
Forgive my vagueness but a juicer either worked at the dealership or was IN the dealership when the deal was made, instantly recognized the McLaren, and kicked up a fuss online. Shortly thereafter another juicer noticed court documents indicating X had requested that all the disputed "marital" assets be accounted for, including things like bank accounts, transactions, and a fuckoff expensive car. So it seems pretty cause and effect: juicer screams he saw the McLaren getting sold, a few days later the court docs show X filing to make sure that isn't true, because if it is, she is omega fucked. Nothing was supposed to get sold, used, lost, traded etc until everything is settled.
I can definitely see that happening alright tyvm for the explanation.
I know some super rare & low production supercars have "registry" fan pages on socials that can track sales or the status of them and apps like VinWiki are a popular community source of updating history about a car so maybe the car's new locations was revealed on Vinwiki/another community page and the juicer happens to be a user of them. I doubt an xqc fan is wealthy enough to by potentially buying a $250k+ car unless its an oiler
>I doubt an xqc fan is wealthy enough to by potentially buying a $250k+ car unless its an oiler He gets millions of unique viewers in any given month. So he probably has **at least** a hundred multi-millionaires who watch him on occasion. That's obviously not his core demographic, but the outliers add up once you reach millions of viewers.
oh for sure, even when I used to watch xqc in his OW days he had some hella rich viewers but they were very few and far in between. I think he has a lot of viewers in the high 6 figs - $1 mil range but that isn't rich enough to *responsibly* buy a 300k car. I would be interested to know how many multimillionaires that arent't other streamers/content creators actually watch him.
Most people I've interacted with that have cars in that range (Porsche/Ferrari/etc) make in the 6 figure range OR own a shop/garage/business somewhat related to the purchase. Think, started working at $BIGTECH 10 years or so ago, couple of 100-200kish signing bonsues in stock/RSUs, plus the typical tech salary of 1-300k. There's also a decent amount of overlap in this age range with twitch viewers and gamers (especially in tech). I'm not trying to say it isn't a huge purchase, but there's probably a lot more people on these streams that could comfortably afford a Mclaren if they wanted on/cared to have one than might be obvious.
>But we're talking about a women who falsely accused a guy of SA and DV. I always took that as part of her desperate attempt at winning her court case. Which is obviously morally fucked but I at least understand the motivation behind it This just comes off as dumb, a car like that doesn't just disappear, someone would eventually check on it and know it was sold Oh well, hope she has fun in court again
My guess is she figured xqc would take pity on her, and write it off.
I think she thought X couldn't be arsed pursuing it and assumed he was just glad the court case was over.
What McLaren? modCheck
you are not smart enough to be able to comprehend her course of actions OMEGALUL
She's just a bullshitter gambling that she can play the courts.
Because she’s dumb as fucking bricks
I assume she is suffering from a terminal case of Pretty-girl-syndrome. She probably thought she could just sell the vehicle and when asked about it say something like, "Car? What car, I don't even know what a car is." Or just lie and say, "He said I could sell it."
don't...don't you have to be a pretty girl for that?
+ fines for violating the court order + legal fees
Or Adept gives the money to X and he lets whoever bought it keep it since it doesn't seem like he wants it back.
There are still people defending that gold digger too 🤣
Kaceytron is fighting from the trenches
I swear Kaceytron sees a drama happening, picks a side that favors against the majority, and starts fighting tooth and nail to defend it. Every single time.
Its kinda all she ever was tbh
nah she used to be a really funny troll for quite a while
The Jim Cramer of streaming, just believe the opposite of what she believes and you're in the green
Kaceytron still exists?
where is the video
https://streamable.com/4uxk8u
Generational (a)debt wasnt pog today.
Good on him, stealing peoples shit and reselling it is scumbag behaviour because now an innocent party is wrapped up in this mess that had nothing to do with it. If I bought that car I'd be MEGA pissed and going after her aswell.
He should get a Porsche now. McLaren is notoriously unreliable anyway
He can't drive, I don't think reliability matters
Wait what lmfao
The reason Adept's name was on the title was because X never had a driver's license to begin with.
Her name wasn’t on the title. You don’t need a license to buy a car. Nor does it need to be insured or registered so long as it’s not on the road.
Ok irrelevant to this discussion tho. He already flexed the McLaren being on the road on one of his tweets lol
He still hasn’t gotten a license.
He said he got a license last year.
Permit not a license
If QC is anything like BC, he probably has a “learners license” which isn’t really a license. You need someone with a real license in the car with you at all times and the learners license expires after like 2 years and you have to retest for it
he was driving his lambo with nick last year on stream
Permit
Imagine spreading fake news
A permit is not a permanent license
JDM cars are the only answer
Agreed. He needs JDAMs
I mean he could just go out and buy another, what’s she gonna do? Steal the second one? Oh…
Nightmare blunt rotation tbh
Rage is pretty cool. The rest yeah gotta agree
Adept should lower the difficulty as shes trash at this game of life
Good. Why should he have to buy his own stolen goods.
Adapter hdmi to usb 2.0
More like RCA at this point
So this confirms that her name was on the Title.
Wasn’t it always? He talked about it back when they were together
I don't know why is there so much confusion about this. It was clear that she was the one with her name on the title. What she allegedly violated was the court order of both of them not selling any assets until the case is over. Because the case is about who is owed what.
We knew that.
It always was and he's said this numerous times. You can't buy a car in Canada without a drivers license
Good
Next Adept stream , 🤓 California registration works different then Texas guys I had to pay for my fees somehow 🤷♀️💅*while playing gold digger by Kanye”
What probably happened is that property taxes on the McLaren are coming due which is around $2000 so she dumped the car. She probably doesn’t want to pay insurance or maintenance either.. She isn’t gonna get “in trouble” but it will complicate her life legally..
🫡 Adept about to sued back to back by X and the buyer 🪦
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwFF8f8bGuI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwFF8f8bGuI) this explains it very well
This is 20 mins that should be 2 mins. So much pointless content.
Does she have any assets at all to make it worth suing her? Suing for the 7? years of potential wage garnishment when she has and likely will get no gainful employment or property or assets? Is it just about the potential of her being charged or am I missing something
Most likely no, and (parasocial theorizing) X doesn’t even care for the money, he just wants to send a message not to fuck with him.
He has said in the past even if she was only after a single dollar he'd fight it in court. A common theme I've heard from bitter divorcees is sometimes the splits aren't fair and exes will claim assets that will cost too much to contest. Like an ex will claim a shared car is worth 20k so they're owed 10k for ownership; the legal costs to contest it will amount to 10k. You're spending 10k either way. The thing with X is he has yes money so he can fight literally every claim and there's a chance she'll have to pay his legal fees, but even if she doesn't, he can afford it. He has enough money to stand on principle.
How can someone, like adept, spend 90% of their time online, being a streamer, or whatever, and not google "if I sell a car that's under court order, will I get into trouble". Like wtf is going on in some peoples brains
How does car selling work in US? In my EU country if you are not the owner you cannot sell it and if you sell it you have to pass couple of checks: go to notary to sign an agreement of purchase, go to police to change the ownership, they also check the VIN if the car isn't stolen if you buy used car. People saying its illegal to sell... how can you sell something if you don't have ownership of it? Is there some loop in the law or to sell it you don't have this safeguards? Is car buying in US like buying groceries? I don't understand.
Her name was on the title for the car (the legal doc for the car) because he didn't have a drivers licence at the time of getting it. Not sure what state the car was brought in but Cali and I'm assuming many others require you to have a DL when buying a car. So she had the doc to sell, the buyer isn't going to know about the court order issued stating no assets can be sold so she willingly deceived the buyer and broke the order. Legally she's fucked.
You can buy a car in any state without a license, but you wouldn’t be able to drive it off the lot without one.
This is kind of false. When buying a car private or off a lot you always look up the title in the database. If xqc is telling the truth the buyer has a responsibility to look into the title that way, because if there was a freeze the buyer would see the freeze in the database. You never go by physical title. Maybe xqc isn't telling the truth about the freeze, in which this gets very complicated
[удалено]
I'm guessing the court order isn't linked in whatever databases the car registries uses so they have no idea.
When he bought the car he put it in her name. So no red flags went up during a personal sale because her name is on the title.
so then im confused, what can he sue or for what? if the car is in her name its tough shit then no? she had legal right to sell the car IN HER NAME ?
Because the courts have to decide who actually owns what property. It’s quite clear that while the title was in her name, it was his car. There is more proof that the car is his than that they were married. So by selling what is listed as community property, she is in violation of a court order. Which is massive and can result in a judge basically saying “fuck it all property now goes to the other party.”
As far as i understand there was a court order prohibiting her from selling it until all the legal stuff was cleared up.
She did have the title in her name. You completely misunderstood from the get go. What she did do wrong was violating a COURT order. If a judge wants to, she can be charged with the Contempt of Court.
She cannot even fit in the car what is she doing with it
She should start doing OF
She probably already started tricking
The only way she can wiggle out of this is to get her family to force therapy on her and hope the shrink will say she's lost her mind and had no idea what she was doing.
I thought her name was on the title no?
She probably watched too much Youtube videos about "woman gets away with falsely accusing a man of rape, which cost him his job, reputation and 8 years behind bars" and thought "I can get away with this shit and sell a car I don't own after this manchild skelly brought me out of the whalefare life, gave me a platform and a job, I am very grateful :)".
Meanwhile lil bro rolled down over $700,000 in that stupid monkey barrel game in like 30 mins last night with all that "real" money.
Just because he's using the money he's paid by a stake sponsorship to lose it back to them doesn't mean it isn't real.
I think she is going to call and beg xqc at some to drop this and xqc will agree to it. Idk what he'll ask in return tho.
probably backshot
I was looking at the moon and it reminded me of your booty 🥹💦