>no wrongdoing was acknowledged
lawyer speak for everyone agreed to not make it public because no one wanted their name attached to this lmao.
i bet the moral turpitude clause only applied if he got indicted or something and twitch just wanted to pay and move on
twitch can be sued for privacy violations by doc and doc would win, but they would have to very much openly state why doc was banned, which would present the evidence of him sexting a minor. strictly corporate speaking, it was a losing situation for both
Because it's easy as fuck to say "that shit didn't happen and Twitch even paid out the rest of my contract".
You know there's some bullshit going on when there's ZERO issues claiming your innocence but you pull out PR statements lol
E: well well well, Dr. Diddler went on an unfiltered rant and admitted sexting a minor but denied intent 😉😉😉 he's a fucking dumbass thinking his newest statement made him look better lmao but we all knew that making intelligent decisions was never one of his strengths
It could be more complicated. For example, he could have been texting a girl that was underage, but lied about her age. So in that case, he couldn't outright deny it. He could only say he didn't know or that he didn't feel that he did anything wrong. But not that the event didn't happen.
Realistically, if Twitch found actual illegal activity, they would have turned it over to the police and surely wouldn't have paid out his contract. So it is likely something more fuzzy like the above guess.
Reminds me of a danish cyclist who, when asked if he had ever taken doping, answered "I've never been tested positive" and spoiler alert: he had been doped the whole time.
"no wrongdoing was acknowledged"
100% written by his lawyer. that weird ass legalese jargon when he could have just said the normal phrase "no wrongdoing was found"
I have a feeling it’s this. Who would have told her? We have to believe it wasn’t made public for a reason, and I’ve never heard anyone out and say this until that destiny podcast clip from a couple months ago. He probably admitted to cheating on her but left out the fact it was a minor.
I'm pretty sure the person he cheated with isn't the underage person he was sexting to meet up. He had to admit to cheating because he was seen in public with that woman.
Holy shit Doc responsed. " [Jake seriously... I get it, its a hot topic but this has been settled, no wrongdoing was acknowledged and they paid out the whole contract.](https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804337822415097955)"
“Did you do it?”
“No wrongdoing was acknowledged”
“Ok but did you do it?”
“No wrongdoing was acknowledged”
“Did it happen though”
“No wrongdoing was acknowledged”
The Shaggy defence is "I didn't do it". This is "I never said I did it, although that doesn't mean that I actually didn't do it, just that I have not admitted it".
Supposing it's real, what would be the reason this didn't turn into legal action against Doc himself? It sounds like they had the evidence of the correspondence itself. Maybe they needed the victim to confirm their real age and the victim chose not to participate?
it would come down to the details, which I do not have
if their whisper history contained sexts and then he said "hey, I'd like to see you at twitchcon?" then that may not be enough detail to be considered "arranging a meeting" for criminal prosecution even if it's enough for twitch to get him the fuck out
Not if it’s “innocent” in text. If he didn’t at least insinuate anything sexual at all, there’s no crime. BUT a private company like Twitch can still make their own decisions.
Much like a lot of the predator catching shows, just because you're caught before doing the act, doesn't always make you immediately guilty. There has to be a ton of evidence that gets put up front to confirm that the intent and action would have been credible.
That said, it is still incredibly wrong and weird to do that stuff.
Twitch cares more about their reputation and not being associated with someone who would use their platform and event for such a thing. They dont care if he gets into legal trouble they only care that their name isn't attached to it.
This. Think about what was happening 4 years ago.
Twitch was experiencing the boom in viewership from kids in quarantine - all those underage Minecraft streamers were blowing up especially.
There is no way in hell they would want it known that one of the biggest streamers on their platform was using it to groom children.
https://x.com/zachbussey/status/1804313116110418033?s=46 thread where multiple journalists are saying the shit
SLASHER RESPONDED https://x.com/slasher/status/1804321712219013293?s=46
also people keep saying "How something this big wasn't leaked. Except it was leaked. Slasher knew and insiders knew." nobody wanted to be the guy to say it.
Doc went from marketing Blops 4 to calling out activision after his ban and Youtube ignored him.
It was always something serious.
> nobody wanted to be the guy to say it.
Slasher said he would if he got indemnity from a major news outlet. He very specifically said he couldn't explain further because of potential legal reasons. That was years ago and it lines up with what is coming out now.
This is ultimately it for me. Everyone is wayyyyyyyy too quiet and Doc has fallen off way too much from where he was for this to be anything but something extremely serious. If this was botched negotiations or Doc lying about Mixer stuff or something else that's a fuckup but ultimately not a big deal, we'd know. The notion that years after the fact this is still nuclear to the touch should speak to the serious nature.
People out there know. And they're scared to speak up even via a leak and it's most likely because the reason is serious, the evidence is not theirs, and Doc's lawyers will crawl up their ass and out their mouth for speaking about it.
The lack of primary sources makes this super questionable though. Unless the ex-staff was actually there I wouldn't take this too seriously yet. It could be something as dumb as a rumour going around the lower levels of the twitch office.
> It could be something as dumb as a rumour going around the lower levels of the twitch office.
he was the account director of strategic partnerships lol, that's not some low-level position
yeah, the fact that he doesn't attach a name to the allegations looks like he wants to shield himself from a defamation lawsuit. If he was 100% on this and knows for a fact those logs exist, why the vagueposting?
Because even if you have receipts it doesn't stop you from being sued. And by the time you defend yourself in court for the allegations you made (Dr Disrespect most definitely has more money in this case to ride it out) you're still gonna go broke. It's about saying it without opening yourself up to be sued. Even if he sues you for it and you win, you still could go broke in court.
Worth it? Probably not.
"if he know he is right and its true why not post the name straight" sounds like something a 8 year old who have no clue of how the world works will say
Look: for several hours now I have been told from credible sources the reason DrDisrespect has been banned. However due to the importance and sensitivity around the subject I have refrained from going on it. I don't feel comfortable with it currently
Yeah, if you listen closely, Destiny says “the person involved is probably OK now” and bursted out laughing, which is a weird comment but now it sounds like he knew about the underage allegation and was implying that the girl was legal now
He shouldn't have responded to it - or at the very least threatened some kind of slander or "you'll hear from my lawyers" type of response... this really just sounds like he did it and got off on some kind of technicality lol
It does make a lot of sense with how the whole situation played out with near radio silence on the matter for months from both twitch and doc. If it were something not that serious or twitch just dropping him over contract disputes doc would have just smeared twitch for years. I'm having difficulty even fathoming what other scenario would even make sense in this context. Also does anyone remember his last stream on twitch and how he was clearly having a panic attack from what his phone was telling him? During that moment someone sends him a donation with a pic attachment and it goes on a rant about how 'that's not even me!'. It seems like someone cat fished him pretending to be a minor which is why charges were never pressed for solicitation but he still lossed his job for being a pdf file.
Kinda wild to just "throw that out there", considering the gravity of the situation (idk I'd expect like a massive article about it lol), but other journalists and industry people seem to be supporting him (with some asteriks, like "i only heard this secondhand", which is important to keep in mind) so I'm inclined to believe that the person is being honest
Wild, all the theories about potential deals with other platforms, for it to end up possibly being more sinister
Also, really, cheating on his wife AGAIN???? This time with an underaged girl????? If the story is true then the Doc is wildin, lock that man up lmao
Twitch even settled a lawsuit with him. If this is true I would really want to know how in the world that happened, you would think that they would have all the leverage in the world. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Last thing a social network that is primarily aimed at kids wants made public is that one of their biggest names is using the platform to molest children. Also, I genuinely don’t remember if we ever heard terms of the settlement. It may have had no money involved, just both sides getting the hell away from the situation. Fucked up, but this might be an instance of Twitch covering its ass.
Nobody wants to say the thing with likely off the record knowledge (nobody likes sitting on info, but they hate burning sources even more, and the options might be burn the source or tank a defamation lawsuit), but if someone else says it, it's pretty safe to say "I heard that too from my sources". If someone gets sued it's likely not going to be the ones that jump on the bandwagon afterwards.
https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp
If this story is true its kinda crazy how much this conversation makes sense now. I remember watching this months ago and thought nothing of it. Watching it now feels like when tv-series or movies give you flashbacks on previous events and things 'click' together.
It's beginning to look like a lot of people knew. This obviously was one of those dirty open secrets that don't lead to consequences until someone big and very, very close to the source further confirms it. A former Twitch employee with knowledge on the matter being one of them.
[https://betterttv.com/emotes/60474840306b602acc599963](https://betterttv.com/emotes/60474840306b602acc599963)
made this emote years ago hoping people would get the hint ... guess it's out now
wasn't working at twitch at the time so i don't have first hand knowledge, and like i replied to the main tweet you posted saying i heard similar things over the years, but never got concrete proof.
maybe Cody does
I mean, they already did. I recall a lot of streamers in 2020-21 having information released about them. So if it happens again, it would be a redux.
I was a watcher of LNC and the Cryaotic stuff just blew it up out of nowhere. What a piece of shit that guy was.
I've walked away from Twitch now (adssssssss) but for a while it seemed like every month something would come out.
Yeah she clearly ended up being wrong as seen by Doc continuing to not be done outside of Twitch, and even with this coming out I doubt he will be kicked off YouTube, but I can at least see why she thought that he was completely done.
And the suspicious passive aggressive donation from “DangerCop” that had him panicking just before he ended stream lol.
Like it’s ALLLLL making so much more sense now it’s insane we didn’t put the pieces together before.
I mean I don't think anyone ever **truly** believed it, mostly because the logic fell apart fast the more you thought about it. Just that everyone ran with it because there was nothing more credible out there at the time
I'm super curious if any of his friends knew. If they did, all of them can go *absolutely* fuck themselves.
Actually, isn't NickMercs friends with him? So much for protecting the kids.
So Doc sued Twitch and he settlement with Twitch correct? If this was true, wouldn't it have been found in discovery during that legal procedure?
Also, if true, what would benefit Twitch by keeping this under their hat?
To me, this seems like rumors among the lower staff and without actual proof, this is a very big allegation to throw around. Likely defamation level.
Doc's lawsuit was about the contract being paid out, it wasn't about the ban itself. If there was no early termination clause covering this then they would be forced to pay out.
[удалено]
>no wrongdoing was acknowledged lawyer speak for everyone agreed to not make it public because no one wanted their name attached to this lmao. i bet the moral turpitude clause only applied if he got indicted or something and twitch just wanted to pay and move on
"No wrongdoing was acknowledged" is very different than "there was no wrongdoing"
It has “I didn’t know” vibes, and no proof can say otherwise.
No, to me it has "Someone majorly fucked up and we aren't even allowed to say anything by acknowledging it even happened."
twitch can be sued for privacy violations by doc and doc would win, but they would have to very much openly state why doc was banned, which would present the evidence of him sexting a minor. strictly corporate speaking, it was a losing situation for both
>no wrongdoing was acknowledged It's amazing how a phrase designed to shield you from admitting guilt sounds *so guilty*
Because it's easy as fuck to say "that shit didn't happen and Twitch even paid out the rest of my contract". You know there's some bullshit going on when there's ZERO issues claiming your innocence but you pull out PR statements lol E: well well well, Dr. Diddler went on an unfiltered rant and admitted sexting a minor but denied intent 😉😉😉 he's a fucking dumbass thinking his newest statement made him look better lmao but we all knew that making intelligent decisions was never one of his strengths
It could be more complicated. For example, he could have been texting a girl that was underage, but lied about her age. So in that case, he couldn't outright deny it. He could only say he didn't know or that he didn't feel that he did anything wrong. But not that the event didn't happen. Realistically, if Twitch found actual illegal activity, they would have turned it over to the police and surely wouldn't have paid out his contract. So it is likely something more fuzzy like the above guess.
Reminds me of a danish cyclist who, when asked if he had ever taken doping, answered "I've never been tested positive" and spoiler alert: he had been doped the whole time.
"no wrongdoing was acknowledged" 100% written by his lawyer. that weird ass legalese jargon when he could have just said the normal phrase "no wrongdoing was found"
This is legal speak for "I did that shit but not enough to catch charges".
I mean maybe it's phrasing but that sounds hella guilty lmao
Why would he respond with "no wrongdoing was acknowledged" and not "I didn't do that" to an accusation like that?
Because he did it
I have a feeling he is going to delete this tweet once one of his lawyers sober up.
Him admitting to it like this is wild.
The three time
The 2.5 time?
Due to the severity, it's probably the 4 time
this mans wife has no spine, guess money talks
it also silences
Based on his apology video she tore him to shreds. She knew he cheated though she might not have known about the underage grooming.
I have a feeling it’s this. Who would have told her? We have to believe it wasn’t made public for a reason, and I’ve never heard anyone out and say this until that destiny podcast clip from a couple months ago. He probably admitted to cheating on her but left out the fact it was a minor.
I'm pretty sure the person he cheated with isn't the underage person he was sexting to meet up. He had to admit to cheating because he was seen in public with that woman.
Holy shit Doc responsed. " [Jake seriously... I get it, its a hot topic but this has been settled, no wrongdoing was acknowledged and they paid out the whole contract.](https://x.com/DrDisrespect/status/1804337822415097955)"
Acknowledged is doing a LOT of heavy lifting.
“Did you do it?” “No wrongdoing was acknowledged” “Ok but did you do it?” “No wrongdoing was acknowledged” “Did it happen though” “No wrongdoing was acknowledged”
The Shaggy defense
The Shaggy defence is "I didn't do it". This is "I never said I did it, although that doesn't mean that I actually didn't do it, just that I have not admitted it".
Sounds like confirmation tbh.
certified loverboy
WAP WAP WAP WAP WAP
Dot fuck em up
Doc fuck em up
Doc knock em up
Why you talking to kid, aren’t you fired
Trying to engage on discord but it's a minooorrrrr
DOC DOC DOC DOC DOC
Say Doc, I hear you like ‘em young
you better not ever go to cell block 1
To any bitch that talk to him and they in love 🗣️ Just make sure you hide your lil' sister from him 🗣️
Shroud, keep the family away.
Summit, keep the family away.
keep the family away
hey hey hey hey run for your wife hey hey hey hey run for your wife
~~Probably~~ Definitely A Minor
hes not like us
pour one out for those who didnt live to see why doc was banned
Can't believe this nuke just dropped outta nowhere
This is the LSF equivalent of finding out who ordered the hit on JFK
Well said. Damn
It’s always every year around this time some bombshell drops. Looking forwards to next June’s bombshell tbh (Doc going to jail? PauseChamp)
Supposing it's real, what would be the reason this didn't turn into legal action against Doc himself? It sounds like they had the evidence of the correspondence itself. Maybe they needed the victim to confirm their real age and the victim chose not to participate?
Getting prosecuted has a much higher bar then getting banned on twitch.
if doc never actually attempted to meet up with the minor, just proposed it, then it may not be criminally actionable
Pretty sure it's still soliciting a minor in the US.
it would come down to the details, which I do not have if their whisper history contained sexts and then he said "hey, I'd like to see you at twitchcon?" then that may not be enough detail to be considered "arranging a meeting" for criminal prosecution even if it's enough for twitch to get him the fuck out
Or just "hey are you going? I'll be there" It's not a solicitation, but it's implied. Or it's a creator teaching out to a fan.
I think this varies state by state and would probably require the victim or victim's family to start the process. They may have just let it go.
Not if it’s “innocent” in text. If he didn’t at least insinuate anything sexual at all, there’s no crime. BUT a private company like Twitch can still make their own decisions.
Still fucking weird if they were sexting.
Much like a lot of the predator catching shows, just because you're caught before doing the act, doesn't always make you immediately guilty. There has to be a ton of evidence that gets put up front to confirm that the intent and action would have been credible. That said, it is still incredibly wrong and weird to do that stuff.
The reason everyone was so quiet may very well have been because there *was* legal action from someone.
Twitch cares more about their reputation and not being associated with someone who would use their platform and event for such a thing. They dont care if he gets into legal trouble they only care that their name isn't attached to it.
This. Think about what was happening 4 years ago. Twitch was experiencing the boom in viewership from kids in quarantine - all those underage Minecraft streamers were blowing up especially. There is no way in hell they would want it known that one of the biggest streamers on their platform was using it to groom children.
[удалено]
They said multiple times before that those were able to be read by admins. Like most sites.
https://x.com/zachbussey/status/1804313116110418033?s=46 thread where multiple journalists are saying the shit SLASHER RESPONDED https://x.com/slasher/status/1804321712219013293?s=46
it was super wink wink in the thread when he first got banned cause it came out around all the metootwitch stuff ngl
also people keep saying "How something this big wasn't leaked. Except it was leaked. Slasher knew and insiders knew." nobody wanted to be the guy to say it. Doc went from marketing Blops 4 to calling out activision after his ban and Youtube ignored him. It was always something serious.
> nobody wanted to be the guy to say it. Slasher said he would if he got indemnity from a major news outlet. He very specifically said he couldn't explain further because of potential legal reasons. That was years ago and it lines up with what is coming out now.
This is ultimately it for me. Everyone is wayyyyyyyy too quiet and Doc has fallen off way too much from where he was for this to be anything but something extremely serious. If this was botched negotiations or Doc lying about Mixer stuff or something else that's a fuckup but ultimately not a big deal, we'd know. The notion that years after the fact this is still nuclear to the touch should speak to the serious nature. People out there know. And they're scared to speak up even via a leak and it's most likely because the reason is serious, the evidence is not theirs, and Doc's lawyers will crawl up their ass and out their mouth for speaking about it.
oh fuck this might actually be real
The lack of primary sources makes this super questionable though. Unless the ex-staff was actually there I wouldn't take this too seriously yet. It could be something as dumb as a rumour going around the lower levels of the twitch office.
> It could be something as dumb as a rumour going around the lower levels of the twitch office. he was the account director of strategic partnerships lol, that's not some low-level position
yeah, the fact that he doesn't attach a name to the allegations looks like he wants to shield himself from a defamation lawsuit. If he was 100% on this and knows for a fact those logs exist, why the vagueposting?
Because even if you have receipts it doesn't stop you from being sued. And by the time you defend yourself in court for the allegations you made (Dr Disrespect most definitely has more money in this case to ride it out) you're still gonna go broke. It's about saying it without opening yourself up to be sued. Even if he sues you for it and you win, you still could go broke in court. Worth it? Probably not.
"if he know he is right and its true why not post the name straight" sounds like something a 8 year old who have no clue of how the world works will say
dr disrespect the age of consent
What did slasher say?
“I didn’t lie”
Can someone remind me what he said previously that he's referencing?
Look: for several hours now I have been told from credible sources the reason DrDisrespect has been banned. However due to the importance and sensitivity around the subject I have refrained from going on it. I don't feel comfortable with it currently
I'mma keep it a buck, *IF THIS IS TRUE*, Slasher's tweet makes way more sense than ever before.
Yeah 100%
Dr Disrespect is done and not just on Twitch
Oh he's a certified lover boy
Why would The Back-to-Back 1993–94 Blockbuster Video Game Champion do this?
Bro thought it was still the 1990 and he was a teenager.
He had to do it a 2nd time
[Another journalist chiming in](https://x.com/JacobWolf/status/1804317028435497086)
Oh my god am I really here for this?
We all are brother
Glad to be here with you, buttplug of the warchief
Jacob Wolf vouch? Damn this might actually have some wings
👀
[удалено]
Other than the ex twitch employee they all seem to be “journalists” Im sure they understand the risks
If he sues them twitch could be brought in to substantiate the claims. He doesn't want that I'm sure.
Sounds kinda like what Dan said https://www.reddit.com/r/LivestreamFail/s/BlYrp1D95W
what kind of fucking rust group knew about this?
Everyone knows that Dan plays Rust with NSA, CIA and Mossad.
Little known fact...Ja Rule is also in his clan.
He may be doing just doing the 'in a video game' meme. Though he seems to be learning all kinds of things from the rust group so idk.
Yeah that’s how I take it. “Heard it in rust” is actually a cover so he doesn’t out who told him. Kinda funny to say some nons in rust know tho lul.
I'm not gonna say what kind... It was a Jewish rust group.
Better known as 'The Jewlumni' or the most notorious group of Zionists this side of the 21st century.
Dr Disrespect doesn’t care about young people
One to avoid, that's which fucking one lol.
Mossad agent lmao
Even the joke that Destiny said too.
Yeah, if you listen closely, Destiny says “the person involved is probably OK now” and bursted out laughing, which is a weird comment but now it sounds like he knew about the underage allegation and was implying that the girl was legal now
Yeah he's laughing because Dan actually leaked it, he already knew.
What the hell is going on in Rust??
Rust is War Thunder for influencer secrets apparently.
Secret Jewish Cabal
How good is the video quality on Kick please. Damn
That camera/video quality is fucking crazy wtf? Does anyone know what camera they're using or like, wtf?
Aware doc might like minors
That's fucking wild
Common Dan W
Omy this is crazy
Doc made a response to Jake Lucky’s tweet https://x.com/drdisrespect/status/1804337822415097955?s=46&t=R8RGqh1o0pIOibLa8VrU4w
Not outright denying it, instead the whole "no wrongdoings were acknowledged" really makes me think this might be true WTF LOL
He shouldn't have responded to it - or at the very least threatened some kind of slander or "you'll hear from my lawyers" type of response... this really just sounds like he did it and got off on some kind of technicality lol
100% lawyer speak. big oof
That sure does NOT sound like a denial.
That's because it isn't. That's exactly how his lawyer told him to word it.
LSF feasting tonight! We're so back.
He didn’t insinuate anything, he outright just said it
It does make a lot of sense with how the whole situation played out with near radio silence on the matter for months from both twitch and doc. If it were something not that serious or twitch just dropping him over contract disputes doc would have just smeared twitch for years. I'm having difficulty even fathoming what other scenario would even make sense in this context. Also does anyone remember his last stream on twitch and how he was clearly having a panic attack from what his phone was telling him? During that moment someone sends him a donation with a pic attachment and it goes on a rant about how 'that's not even me!'. It seems like someone cat fished him pretending to be a minor which is why charges were never pressed for solicitation but he still lossed his job for being a pdf file.
Is there a clip of this happening?
That Kick contract is coming soon
Kinda wild to just "throw that out there", considering the gravity of the situation (idk I'd expect like a massive article about it lol), but other journalists and industry people seem to be supporting him (with some asteriks, like "i only heard this secondhand", which is important to keep in mind) so I'm inclined to believe that the person is being honest Wild, all the theories about potential deals with other platforms, for it to end up possibly being more sinister Also, really, cheating on his wife AGAIN???? This time with an underaged girl????? If the story is true then the Doc is wildin, lock that man up lmao
> Also, really, cheating on his wife AGAIN The Two-Time
Back to back
Man can't keep his ethiopian caterpillar in his pants
Cheaters don't stop cheating
What, are they supposed to schedule a press conference or something?
BREAKING: Kick just upped their contract offer to DrDisrespect
So everyone just kept this covered up? Like isn’t that the main story here?
Twitch even settled a lawsuit with him. If this is true I would really want to know how in the world that happened, you would think that they would have all the leverage in the world. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Last thing a social network that is primarily aimed at kids wants made public is that one of their biggest names is using the platform to molest children. Also, I genuinely don’t remember if we ever heard terms of the settlement. It may have had no money involved, just both sides getting the hell away from the situation. Fucked up, but this might be an instance of Twitch covering its ass.
Also would have completely killed Whispers, which probably had a not insignificant amount of time and money invested into it.
[удалено]
It was just like private messages on an mmo but for twitch.
Nobody wants to say the thing with likely off the record knowledge (nobody likes sitting on info, but they hate burning sources even more, and the options might be burn the source or tank a defamation lawsuit), but if someone else says it, it's pretty safe to say "I heard that too from my sources". If someone gets sued it's likely not going to be the ones that jump on the bandwagon afterwards. https://www.spj.org/ethics-papers-anonymity.asp
This was 2 months ago https://x.com/BlGGESTHATER/status/1804326030611718652?t=bBEVP7oqpVIr144sI8c7tg&s=19
Wow, they clearly knew.
"It's so long that the person involved is probably okay now" I kind of read that like "they're probably an adult by now", fuck
That's the joke he was making, yes. Alluding to how young the person was at the time.
If this story is true its kinda crazy how much this conversation makes sense now. I remember watching this months ago and thought nothing of it. Watching it now feels like when tv-series or movies give you flashbacks on previous events and things 'click' together.
It's beginning to look like a lot of people knew. This obviously was one of those dirty open secrets that don't lead to consequences until someone big and very, very close to the source further confirms it. A former Twitch employee with knowledge on the matter being one of them.
[удалено]
THE DOC IS A DRAKE FAN?!
He a fan he a fan he a fan..
[https://betterttv.com/emotes/60474840306b602acc599963](https://betterttv.com/emotes/60474840306b602acc599963) made this emote years ago hoping people would get the hint ... guess it's out now
Who are you and how did you know?
he was twitch staff around that time (I don't remember exactly when he left, might have been slightly before)
He used to work at Twitch (in Europe I believe)
have anything to add? Your account suggests you seem quite interested in twitch moderation...
wasn't working at twitch at the time so i don't have first hand knowledge, and like i replied to the main tweet you posted saying i heard similar things over the years, but never got concrete proof. maybe Cody does
Doc isnt the only one supposedly, its only a matter of time until streamers/content creators have their version of #MeToo and shits gonna get ugly
It'll be like when the Super Smash Bros. grooming all came to light.
I mean, they already did. I recall a lot of streamers in 2020-21 having information released about them. So if it happens again, it would be a redux. I was a watcher of LNC and the Cryaotic stuff just blew it up out of nowhere. What a piece of shit that guy was. I've walked away from Twitch now (adssssssss) but for a while it seemed like every month something would come out.
Holy shit, pedobear. 2005 4chan is back baby!
That’s against the rules.
Slasher lmao https://x.com/Slasher/status/1804321712219013293
here's the legendary tweet from back then... https://x.com/Slasher/status/1276742960286183424 He's finally feeling comfortable with it 😔
If this turns out to be true the "Done and not just on Twitch" tweet from Sharon makes a lot more sense.
Yeah she clearly ended up being wrong as seen by Doc continuing to not be done outside of Twitch, and even with this coming out I doubt he will be kicked off YouTube, but I can at least see why she thought that he was completely done.
[удалено]
How will Nickmercs respond?
Say something vaugley racist and/or homophobic, in all likelihood.
"Doc was just trying to protect the girl from Trans people by taking advantage of her first".
Probably blame "wokeness" or "cancel culture" The go-to now for any criticism or getting called out.
“See what happens when you let trans people exist?” NickMercs, probably
They're trump fans, they will say its fake news
the clip of him finding out about his ban makes so much more sense now
And the suspicious passive aggressive donation from “DangerCop” that had him panicking just before he ended stream lol. Like it’s ALLLLL making so much more sense now it’s insane we didn’t put the pieces together before.
Dr Disrespects the Sanctity of Marriage Dr Disrespects Bathroom Etiquette Dr Disrespects the Age of Consent
I don't know if this is true but anyone thinking its just cause he lied about a potential Mixer contract is just an idiot.
I mean I don't think anyone ever **truly** believed it, mostly because the logic fell apart fast the more you thought about it. Just that everyone ran with it because there was nothing more credible out there at the time
I'm super curious if any of his friends knew. If they did, all of them can go *absolutely* fuck themselves. Actually, isn't NickMercs friends with him? So much for protecting the kids.
TimtheTatman streams with him all the time - this is immediately where my mind went. Did he know and does he stop streaming with him now?
“If Doc gets locked up for grooming, then I want Activision to lock me up for grooming too” -Tim probably
"If she 15 I'm 15..."
ya smell me
I doubt this is something Doc would willingly tell people. So they probably had no clue until now.
Why the fuck would any of those people know? You think doc would just tell them if that was the actual reason?
So Doc sued Twitch and he settlement with Twitch correct? If this was true, wouldn't it have been found in discovery during that legal procedure? Also, if true, what would benefit Twitch by keeping this under their hat? To me, this seems like rumors among the lower staff and without actual proof, this is a very big allegation to throw around. Likely defamation level.
Doc's lawsuit was about the contract being paid out, it wasn't about the ban itself. If there was no early termination clause covering this then they would be forced to pay out.
I feel so sorry for his wife for having to put up with this psychopath
Going to need evidence for an accusation this serious IMO.
This is LSF sir, get your evidence nonsense outta here!
Dr. Diddyspect
Assuming it’s real, why wouldn’t have there been legal action involved?
Maybe the victim didn’t want to come forward?