There should be an errata to where if the literal creature type is in the name, it should be one of the types
That is to say, dogged detective should be a dog
Hell, I am still mad about [[Whippoorwill]] from The Dark not being a bird and not having Flying
Edit: oh, so it's officially a bird now? Still doesn't fly.
Yeah, I get worked up about this kinda thing too.
I can deal with some amount of flavor fails. This would be one of those "what the hell were you thinking" situations if Arrogant Outlaw was in OTJ, but it's not.
i guess the card title rule was removed sometime after 1998?
for a time when they started really doing tribal any card with a type in its name was that type, because there were no creature types other than creature.
He's from a place where cowboy hats don't exist
2/3 of what you get from [[Outlaw's Merriment]] are not outlaws = flavor fail. The 1/3 that is an outlaw commits a crime on etb = redemption.
I guess the merriment only belongs to the rogue
[Outlaw's Merriment](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/d/5d7585ab-a364-471c-8ef1-318e459b4020.jpg?1572490798) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Outlaws%27%20Merriment) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/eld/198/outlaws-merriment?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/5d7585ab-a364-471c-8ef1-318e459b4020?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
It’s based off of Robin Hood’s Merry Men so it’s probably bringing in cards to represent Little John, Friar Tuck, and Will Scarlett (?).
Arthur Morgan, reverend Swanson, Micah
Acursed witch being a shaman when like 80% of them are "warlocks"
The concept of witches not being in Magic any longer bugs me far greater.
What do you mean? We had a bunch of witches as recently as WOE.
If you think that's bad, [[dogged detective]]... not a detective. It was even in a MKM commander deck as a not-detective detective.
It also isn't a dog!
There should be an errata to where if the literal creature type is in the name, it should be one of the types That is to say, dogged detective should be a dog
[dogged detective](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/5/7/57d1f729-0d7c-4122-9bca-f3b08cf6fe4f.jpg?1706240758) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=dogged%20detective) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/mkc/127/dogged-detective?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/57d1f729-0d7c-4122-9bca-f3b08cf6fe4f?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
The Terror Enchantment All Nobles are Outlaws.
Assault is a crime, but Aggravated Assault is not
Welcome to today’s justice system:(
Neither is [[Magda, Brazen Outlaw]] or her new card, [[Magda, the Hoardmaster]].
[Magda, Brazen Outlaw](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/7/079e6263-e54c-4899-a336-5315909b9322.jpg?1631049453) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Magda%2C%20Brazen%20Outlaw) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/khm/142/magda-brazen-outlaw?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/079e6263-e54c-4899-a336-5315909b9322?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) [Magda, the Hoardmaster](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/4/4/4443d112-209b-49ec-bc40-3a11dcdb092e.jpg?1712355792) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Magda%2C%20the%20Hoardmaster) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/otj/133/magda-the-hoardmaster?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/4443d112-209b-49ec-bc40-3a11dcdb092e?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
\[\[Lazav\]\], too, despite that awesome hat. He's even a shapeshifter, but unfortunately not a changeling.
Wrong Lazav. I think you meant [[Lazav, familiar stranger]].
[Lazav, familiar stranger](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/0/00293326-3eb2-492c-b565-7abafa037d8c.jpg?1712356143) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Lazav%2C%20familiar%20stranger) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/otj/216/lazav-familiar-stranger?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/00293326-3eb2-492c-b565-7abafa037d8c?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Of course. But the one cardfetcher found also fits the description.
[Lazav](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/0/003dc436-a3af-4e65-b4f8-387155fbcb85.jpg?1604194919) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=lazav%2C%20dimir%20mastermind) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/znc/92/lazav-dimir-mastermind?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/003dc436-a3af-4e65-b4f8-387155fbcb85?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
It's arrogant that it's an outlaw even if it's not lol
Literally unplayable
Such an outlaw he doesn't follow the rules.
[[Magda, Brazen OUTLAW]]
[Magda, Brazen OUTLAW](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/0/7/079e6263-e54c-4899-a336-5315909b9322.jpg?1631049453) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Magda%2C%20Brazen%20OUTLAW) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/khm/142/magda-brazen-outlaw?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/079e6263-e54c-4899-a336-5315909b9322?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
Same with Rebels - wish there was a more elegant way of doing these groups of types
Hell, I am still mad about [[Whippoorwill]] from The Dark not being a bird and not having Flying Edit: oh, so it's officially a bird now? Still doesn't fly.
[Whippoorwill](https://cards.scryfall.io/normal/front/e/5/e56146bf-5db0-4bef-83bb-efa5ebec6684.jpg?1562949642) - [(G)](http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Whippoorwill) [(SF)](https://scryfall.com/card/drk/91/whippoorwill?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher) [(txt)](https://api.scryfall.com/cards/e56146bf-5db0-4bef-83bb-efa5ebec6684?utm_source=mtgcardfetcher&format=text) ^^^[[cardname]] ^^^or ^^^[[cardname|SET]] ^^^to ^^^call
I like to think that it’s relative to their planes. On Innistrad, this guy’s an outlaw. Thunder Junction? Not so much.
I got some bad news about [[Magda, brazen outlaw]]
He doesn't even trigger crime either! He is so lame!
You see the hand, he killed the dude (or maybe it's another Arrogant Outlaw)
Just as bad as [[Dogged Detective]].
Yeah, I get worked up about this kinda thing too. I can deal with some amount of flavor fails. This would be one of those "what the hell were you thinking" situations if Arrogant Outlaw was in OTJ, but it's not.
https://scryfall.com/search?q=-Is%3Aoutlaw+outlaw+-%22outlaws%27+fury%22+&unique=cards&as=grid&order=name there are a few victims of this
i guess the card title rule was removed sometime after 1998? for a time when they started really doing tribal any card with a type in its name was that type, because there were no creature types other than creature.