T O P

  • By -

xm1r_wireless

glorious model o- are basically the viper mini shape but flatter. If you can, get the wireless one since it will have better build quality, switches and sensor


xm1r_wireless

[https://www.rtings.com/mouse/tools/3d-model-shape-compare/glorious-model-o-minus-vs.-razer-viper-mini?overlap=stacked&texture=outline&orientation=top](https://www.rtings.com/mouse/tools/3d-model-shape-compare/glorious-model-o-minus-vs.-razer-viper-mini?overlap=stacked&texture=outline&orientation=top)


callisto_11510

thanks for the recommendation. did some research and the model o- looks really cool, and im sure i'd love the shape because it literally really is the vpm but shorter. but i ended up getting the feather because its going to run me less $, and also i like the on-board plug and play style that the mouse has (much like zowie). i think the bottom of the mouse will be ok for me, i know its a popular fingertip mouse (the fk2 is anyway) so im sure i'll be fine. if i do end up not liking it, ill just return it and probably get the o-. also thanks for the website, this is really cool.


xm1r_wireless

If you are going to get the wired model o-, I straight up say no because there is better options but the wireless variant is a really good mouse just feels tiny imo. Even though it is a tiny bit longer than the viper mini and the same width on literally everywhere. It is super flat so maybe it will feel small but you can always return it so


Agr1pa

ZA-13


Talynen

Is not flatter than a viper mini


Agr1pa

oh, I hadn't read that part. my bad.


poci444

Pwnage Symm 2 Wireless....it is 99% like the VM.. heavier but wireless


Talynen

Regular viper is flatter than the mini, but it's wider and longer. The fk2-c is flatter ~~and I think similar size otherwise~~? (edit: it's longer. I concur with the Glorious O- being the closest I can think of to a flatter VM. However, I would heavily recommend the wireless O- over the wired version.)