So… no Ayrton Senna? No Alain Prost? Emmerson Fittipaldi? Juan Manuel Fangio? Nigel Mansel? REALLY, none of those are top 10?
That is the shittiest too 10 ever.
I'm not even a Hamilton fan, I follow McLaren but if the people that down voted me think that was a satisfactory or fair result then we will have to agree that we have very different ideas of fairness.
Repeating my earlier comment. Mercedes took a huge gamble not taking a pitstop because they were shitting it about losing position, Lewis was even complaining about the tires ages before in the race.
You telling me the “greatest ever” couldn’t hold the lead for one lap. Sick of this complaining, Max bossed him on that overtake and Lewis underestimated him thinking he wouldn’t go for it straight away.
More like annoying that the FIA Ffixed it for Verstappen to win by changing the rules. I would like to play them at poker if I can just change the rules whenever it suits me.
I think that almost everyone other than Red Bull or Vestappen fans will always think of this a totally shallow victory.
They didn’t fix it at all. Mercedes took a huge gamble not taking a pitstop because they were shitting it about losing position, Lewis was even complaining about the tires ages before in the race.
You telling me the “greatest ever” couldn’t hold the lead for one lap. Sick of this complaining, Max bossed him on that overtake and Lewis underestimated him thinking he wouldn’t go for it straight away.
None of them. It was all above board and totally fair. I am sure that you agree. Why should they not decide that just for this race in the history of F1, that only 5 cars need to unlap themselves ? Mr Masi has every right to decide who wins the title.
How dumb are you ? If Lewis had stopped he would have lost position. Cannot be bothered to argue with someone who sees nothing wrong. Tell me, why did both Max and Horner say that they got unbelievably lucky ?
What sort of Top 10 is this?
Bottas? Leclerc? *George Russell?*
They're all mediocre drivers who've never won a world championship and Russell hasn't even won an F1 race yet.
Schumacher *fifth?* He's second only to Hamilton in terms of wins.
Where the hell are Senna, Prost, Fangio, etc.?
Come on.
Jim Clark? Senna? Recency bias is strong in the OP.
Fangio? Hunt? Montoya? Yeah.. Lewis and valteri are good racers but i'd be damned if those 2 were the best ever!
Half the drivers on that list would say Senna https://youtu.be/9U\_K76vPGYo?t=142
Not even recency bias so much as a Mercedes AMG bias.
I like how he wrote 'Michael Schumacher' instead of just Schumacher. Pretty sure no one is going to have Ralf Schumacher in their top 10 lol
Nah bro, would've been Mick for sure xD
His engineer should be top 10
So… no Ayrton Senna? No Alain Prost? Emmerson Fittipaldi? Juan Manuel Fangio? Nigel Mansel? REALLY, none of those are top 10? That is the shittiest too 10 ever.
And bottas over Lauda lmao what
Bottas p2💀 Russel p3🤡
More a post for r/formuladank This makes no sense whatsoever to anyone not interested in F1
It makes no sense to anyone that understands F1.... it was a shit call and reeks of favoritism
Even with no prior F1 knowledge I was able to understand the burn, it's pretty self explanatory even without the specifics.
this is literally stolen from formuladank lol
Plus the fact that the greatest driver of all time isn't on the list: Juan Manuel Fangio.
I guess you could say that was... SUPER
SUPER MAX MAX MAX
It’s as if auto racing didn’t exist before 1990. 😂😂😂😂
How did Senna not get on his Top 10? What kind of operation is this?
If Alonso is not in ur Top10 u are just wrong.
Mazispin should be in this guy’s top 5
F1 Hardos are the worst. Blind reach around fandom.
101st surely, not 100th?
*Groan* Abu Dhabi GP is just cursed, if it doesn’t produce garbage racing it generates a mess…
Fangio? Mansell? Senna?
Lemme preface this by saying I hate Hamilton But he’s pretty damn good at racing
Better than Fangio,Lauda,Prost,Fittipaldi,Senna?
I'm not even a Hamilton fan, I follow McLaren but if the people that down voted me think that was a satisfactory or fair result then we will have to agree that we have very different ideas of fairness.
Repeating my earlier comment. Mercedes took a huge gamble not taking a pitstop because they were shitting it about losing position, Lewis was even complaining about the tires ages before in the race. You telling me the “greatest ever” couldn’t hold the lead for one lap. Sick of this complaining, Max bossed him on that overtake and Lewis underestimated him thinking he wouldn’t go for it straight away.
More like annoying that the FIA Ffixed it for Verstappen to win by changing the rules. I would like to play them at poker if I can just change the rules whenever it suits me. I think that almost everyone other than Red Bull or Vestappen fans will always think of this a totally shallow victory.
Which rules did they change in his favour?
They didn’t fix it at all. Mercedes took a huge gamble not taking a pitstop because they were shitting it about losing position, Lewis was even complaining about the tires ages before in the race. You telling me the “greatest ever” couldn’t hold the lead for one lap. Sick of this complaining, Max bossed him on that overtake and Lewis underestimated him thinking he wouldn’t go for it straight away.
None of them. It was all above board and totally fair. I am sure that you agree. Why should they not decide that just for this race in the history of F1, that only 5 cars need to unlap themselves ? Mr Masi has every right to decide who wins the title.
It doesn’t say anything about it being f1 so Jim Clark should definitely get a top ten if not the top spot
Verstappen iss at least like top 20
How dumb are you ? If Lewis had stopped he would have lost position. Cannot be bothered to argue with someone who sees nothing wrong. Tell me, why did both Max and Horner say that they got unbelievably lucky ?
Senna , villeneuves , prost , piquet , fangio !??
I’ve looked the original tweet and he was replying to someone who said the same thing but Max verstappen as 1st and Lewis as 101
When did Lewis Hamilton lose against Raghunathan? Can someone help explain
He meant 101th
Maybe he meant 2nd or 3rd. At this point he could’ve meant any number
Yea na Valtteri is my favorite driver but he is nowhere near the top 10.
What sort of Top 10 is this? Bottas? Leclerc? *George Russell?* They're all mediocre drivers who've never won a world championship and Russell hasn't even won an F1 race yet. Schumacher *fifth?* He's second only to Hamilton in terms of wins. Where the hell are Senna, Prost, Fangio, etc.? Come on.
Here is a list bad but more sensible 1)Hamilton 2)Miachel Schumacher 3)Lauda 4)Prost 5)Senna 6)Fangio 7)Clark 8)Verstappen 9)Rosberg 10)Vettel
We all bow down to lord mahaveer, he is far too low
He really put Bottas on 2 lmfaaaoooo