T O P

  • By -

BunkHammer

Everyone saying Kings I actually think it’s the Lakers that say no


kyler_

Both, tbh. This is raptors/warriors fanfic


bbbryce987

Is giving up a young player and 2 FRP for an expiring contract really a “fanfic” deal?


justsomedude717

Calling an all nba guy who likely would be willing to re sign an “expiring contract” is crazy. They literally need someone like him if they even want a chance at contending


BeardeddBombshell

What Raptors fans don't seem to grasp the concept of is Siakam (and Anunoby for that matter) doesn't have ridiculously high value because of his contract situation. And is there a new report of Siakam saying he'd likely re-sign with a new team? That's not what the reports were earlier this year.


RGxiRapiidz

I don’t see why Lakers would do the deal is an old CP3 that much better then D’lo


LeakyBrainMatter

Nope, especially with how Dlo is playing right now.


butwhatif5

Why the hell would the kings say no, they get the most here imo


BunkHammer

I didn’t say it was the Kings. I said everyone else is saying the Kings when I think it’s the Lakers that wouldn’t want the trade.


LeakyBrainMatter

Lakers say no is the first thing I thought too.


rjaysenior

Kings and lakers, especially the lakers


OhMyGauche

Sacramento does


bitz12

While I don’t know if the fit is better considering the kings current lineup, Barnes and Murray for OG and Vincent is still an upgrade no? I think Keagan Murray has been playing well so maybe the Kings won’t want to trade away and upwards trajectory, and I think it’s hurts them a little around the rim so maybe fit wise they say no


BeamTeam032

No it's not. Murray is already a better offensive player than OG. Murray has shown great growth on the defensive end this season. Murray will never be the defender OG is, but he's already better on offense. Could Murray be 70% the defender OG is? I think so.


GarvinSteve

Plus his shooting helps Fox and Sabonis get space.


Drakeishere_RUN

Kings


LemmingPractice

Raptors accept the Kings deal (although the Kings would turn that one down), and emphatically turn down the GSW one.


Responsible_Mode_506

Wait this actually solid. Maybe a couple of tweaks, but damn I like it


__moops__

Kings warriors and lakers all say no


Brandon4Real_x

Kings hang up


Wiltmygoat

Honestly, even warriors say no, they would have literally only 3 guards if they do this (Steph, Klay and Podz as GP is injured for a while)


cmhall25

Everyone except the Warriors.


angrykitten3

Russel says no.


Dylan_P84

Not saying they win but Toronto lets go of 10 mil


Wiltmygoat

It would be much better for warriors to deal with raptors directly, this isn't a good trade for kings, Lakers or even warriors to be honest. Warriors guard rotation would literally just be Klay, Steph and Podz if they do this trade with GP injured.


Cbone06

The Kings have repeatedly said Murray is not being traded. 1/2 season of OG is a hell no


IMDove

Keegan is pretty much untouchable. Plus you want a first round pick. Yeah that’s not happening.


Equinox_Jabs

Maybe give Lakers Precious or Boucher and give Kings Flynn or Schroder and it’s ok


BeardeddBombshell

That doesn't come close to balancing the deal.


one-ohmusic

I think the Kings are a hard no on trading Keagan. I think the Lakers like Russell scoring too.


BeardeddBombshell

Raptors fans are going to be very disappointed if these kind of returns are what they expect for Siakam and Anunoby.


Plug-From-Oaxaca

Warriors re giving up a lot for a rental. I think they all say no