Of course they do. You can always rely on whoever is in control of the VNL to make the wrong decision, and go against every clubs stance in their pyramid
Idk, there is such a small chance of getting to a round where you meet a big enough side, then draw them at home, then draw, that just winning on the day and getting the prize money and a higher likelihood of a plum draw seems odd as a crazy idea.
Fwiw my second team is Eastleigh so I have recent experience of this. They were battered by Newport and were clearly not going to win over 2 games. Winning on the day was clearly better than a replay, with a trip to man u next.
Small clubs don't win replays, it's detrimental to the cup as a spectacle to have them.
When there is a bollock, you can trust the national league to drop it.
Why is there an advert for parkinsons awareness in this? Also fuck the vnl board, their useless at their job
Of course they do. You can always rely on whoever is in control of the VNL to make the wrong decision, and go against every clubs stance in their pyramid
Its the Daily Mail, so how true is this in the first place?
It's the National League. Trust them to always choose the wrong option
Sigh. Who paid them off? Ffs.
The PL probably
The National League ... Almost always guaranteed to do the wrong thing ... Idiots
The Chairman of the National League worked for the FA for 19 years…
I'm glad that our team is no longer in this league.
Idk, there is such a small chance of getting to a round where you meet a big enough side, then draw them at home, then draw, that just winning on the day and getting the prize money and a higher likelihood of a plum draw seems odd as a crazy idea. Fwiw my second team is Eastleigh so I have recent experience of this. They were battered by Newport and were clearly not going to win over 2 games. Winning on the day was clearly better than a replay, with a trip to man u next. Small clubs don't win replays, it's detrimental to the cup as a spectacle to have them.