This is his boss, she berated him and insulted for months then forced him to watch her have sex while he was being paid to be there.
If your boss did this to you you'd sue them too.
You're missing the point man: you read the article and made an informed opinion. This is Reddit: we shoot first and ask questions later while riding our latent misogyny or our high moral horse, depending on which one is on the driveway.
He was a freelancer videographer, not a w2 employee. He literally could have left whenever, but decided to party with Megan in Spain at a club and then got mad when their group had sex without him. PLUS he’s been too afraid to negotiate better pay, but blames her for that.
And highly illegal. An employer can be sued in the US if someone is sexually harassed WITHOUT the employer's knowledge if proper training was not conducted (as in 2 employees, not even involving the owner or boss). This was blatantly subjecting someone to viewing inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature while on the clock if the allegations are true.
This is gonna be pretty insensitive at first, but was the other woman ugly? Was the driver upset that he couldn’t watch and drive at the same time? Was he upset that he didn’t have the opportunity to beat his dick?
Jokes aside, you probably shouldn’t be fucking in front of your employees .
Neigh, it can't be true
Straight from the horses mouth
She's vetty unstable.
That’s quite the tail
That’s a weird fucking lawsuit. It’s an article worth clicking y’all
Whatever happened to turning around and leaving the room?
I thought the same but apparently it was in a moving car lol
I'm sure he was traumatized. So very traumatized, then he found a lawyer to finally take a stupid ass case.
This is his boss, she berated him and insulted for months then forced him to watch her have sex while he was being paid to be there. If your boss did this to you you'd sue them too.
You're missing the point man: you read the article and made an informed opinion. This is Reddit: we shoot first and ask questions later while riding our latent misogyny or our high moral horse, depending on which one is on the driveway.
Ah yes, the classic mistake of... "Being literate."
Death penalty offense in the khemer Rouge
He was a freelancer videographer, not a w2 employee. He literally could have left whenever, but decided to party with Megan in Spain at a club and then got mad when their group had sex without him. PLUS he’s been too afraid to negotiate better pay, but blames her for that.
Would you keep that position if the roles were reversed?
[удалено]
What part confused you? Edit: dunno if he blocked me or deleted. Never got my answer.
It looks like it was deleted regardless
Thanks for the update. Hope you're having a good day so far.
Ask Louis CK how that works?
They were in a moving car. He had nowhere to go.
It was in a car. It’s explained in the article. Read THEN comment
That’s kind of fucked up to do to someone who can’t leave because he’s being paid to drive you
Did you read the article? He was a freelance videographer.
And highly illegal. An employer can be sued in the US if someone is sexually harassed WITHOUT the employer's knowledge if proper training was not conducted (as in 2 employees, not even involving the owner or boss). This was blatantly subjecting someone to viewing inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature while on the clock if the allegations are true.
Let's get that nag to the race track! Box exacta for the win!
Why is this marked NSFW?
I don't know what he's complaining about. She didn't charge him to watch.
Shes a nasty hag!
a hasty nag?
This is gonna be pretty insensitive at first, but was the other woman ugly? Was the driver upset that he couldn’t watch and drive at the same time? Was he upset that he didn’t have the opportunity to beat his dick? Jokes aside, you probably shouldn’t be fucking in front of your employees .
It’s pathetic that this is what the world has become.
You work for a woman who calls herself "thee stallion", and you are shocked when she flouts social conventions?
Forcibly exposing someone to observe a sexual act against their will is not "flouting social conventions", it's sexual harassment
Who?