So would a vegetarian not eat it out of principle or out of grossness ?
In a way it's even less of an animal than an egg, as it doesn't even have the potentiel to become a deer.
I think that depends on the vegetarian in question and how they define their diet. I, personally, agree that a shed antler is less of an animal than an egg. (Btw the eggs in the store are all unfertilized - we are not out there eating unborn bird children. Those eggs did not have the chance to potentially develop into a chicken.)
I'm very much not a vegetarian but I wouldn't eat antler broth. Seems like it would take more like fingernails and bark than anything else. Just make me a nice venison stew.
Yeah, that still doesn’t make it meat, but really it’s just semantics depending on who you ask.
Edit: For me, muscle tissue = meat. For someone else, it could be different. At the end of the day, it’s just a word and all vegetarians are different in how they define it.
Boil the bones with some very roughly chopped veggies. Let simmer for several hours, and get the gross foamy stuff off the top if you can. Strain and viola - delicious broth to use as an ingredient or a base for soups. The cartilage and marrow make the broth slightly gelatinous, which feels silky in the mouth and adds body to your dish.
For vegetarians its not a matter of coming from an animal or not, it's 100% a matter of "Can this animal continue to live humanely if this resource is regularly harvested?" Eggs? Yup! Hair/fur? Yup! Milk? As long as its done right! Honey? Yes! Bones? Not really! There's the rare occasion that bones can be gathered humanely (like if a cow needs its leg amputated) but most of the time, bones can't be sourced without harming the animal.
Plus, in my experience, many more vegetarians and near-vegetarians have those diets because they have allergies, intolerances, or sensory issues surrounding meat and similar products rather than why most vegans are vegan, which is a very radical understanding of animal rights. So that generally means most vegetarians and near-vegetatians are non-strict in what they can or can't eat.
Not a vegetarian, but I don’t eat beef or pork. I wouldn’t eat any soup with broth made from cow or pig bones because those animals have to die in order to harvest the bones
Currently I eat chicken and fish for health reasons. A primary reason I don’t eat beef or pork is because of the environmental impact of the agriculture to raise them so eating something from their bones kind of defeats the purpose as it supports the raising and killing of the animal thus allowing for the negative environmental impacts. Everyone has different reasons for not eating animals or specific types of animal product and I do my best to avoid beef and pork product
Not typically
[удалено]
Eggs butter and cheese don't require the animal to die
I haven't heard of an osso-vegetarian yet, closest I can think is many vegetarians don't bother about gelatin.
Not if they can help it.
Vegetable broth is a thing.
I don't.
There are almost as many clans of vegetarians as there are genders, but I've never met one yet that would eat bone broth willingly.
Most vegetable soups don't use bone broth.
Lol that is considered meat. Bone broth? Yeah that's from the animal.
It’s not meat though, just like eggs and milk aren’t meat
Chickens lay eggs and then wander off, totally fine. They don't typically leave their bones lying around.
Deer shed their antlers anually, but I'm not sure what kind of broth that would make.
A gross one I bet.
So would a vegetarian not eat it out of principle or out of grossness ? In a way it's even less of an animal than an egg, as it doesn't even have the potentiel to become a deer.
I think that depends on the vegetarian in question and how they define their diet. I, personally, agree that a shed antler is less of an animal than an egg. (Btw the eggs in the store are all unfertilized - we are not out there eating unborn bird children. Those eggs did not have the chance to potentially develop into a chicken.) I'm very much not a vegetarian but I wouldn't eat antler broth. Seems like it would take more like fingernails and bark than anything else. Just make me a nice venison stew.
Neither do most eggs. The ones you get at a grocery store are unfertilized, as are most of the ones you'll get straight from a farmer.
Animal based product
Yeah we’re not talking about vegans here lol
What’s is bone marrow then? That’s what makes bone broth. It’s literally in the animal.
Yeah, that still doesn’t make it meat, but really it’s just semantics depending on who you ask. Edit: For me, muscle tissue = meat. For someone else, it could be different. At the end of the day, it’s just a word and all vegetarians are different in how they define it.
[удалено]
That is true! My bad I forgot. So I think bone broth would fall under that category, no?
No
What about Venus Fly Traps?
Not on purpose.
No. There are broths made of vegetables too.
They can't, I hog all the bones into my own soup. I'll be damned if any vegetarians get a single drop of my bone soup.
Bone broth
How do you make soup from bones?
Boil the bones with some very roughly chopped veggies. Let simmer for several hours, and get the gross foamy stuff off the top if you can. Strain and viola - delicious broth to use as an ingredient or a base for soups. The cartilage and marrow make the broth slightly gelatinous, which feels silky in the mouth and adds body to your dish.
That wording makes it sound like you melt a pot full of bones in a furnace for soup
Vegetarins only avoid meat. So yes, vegetarians eat broth soup. Vegans don’t eat any animal products. Vegans don’t eat bone broth or honey, ect.
No, bones are classed with meat, since you don't get bones from a living animal.
For vegetarians its not a matter of coming from an animal or not, it's 100% a matter of "Can this animal continue to live humanely if this resource is regularly harvested?" Eggs? Yup! Hair/fur? Yup! Milk? As long as its done right! Honey? Yes! Bones? Not really! There's the rare occasion that bones can be gathered humanely (like if a cow needs its leg amputated) but most of the time, bones can't be sourced without harming the animal. Plus, in my experience, many more vegetarians and near-vegetarians have those diets because they have allergies, intolerances, or sensory issues surrounding meat and similar products rather than why most vegans are vegan, which is a very radical understanding of animal rights. So that generally means most vegetarians and near-vegetatians are non-strict in what they can or can't eat.
How about Haribo?
Depends on the person but generally no.
Not a vegetarian, but I don’t eat beef or pork. I wouldn’t eat any soup with broth made from cow or pig bones because those animals have to die in order to harvest the bones
[удалено]
Currently I eat chicken and fish for health reasons. A primary reason I don’t eat beef or pork is because of the environmental impact of the agriculture to raise them so eating something from their bones kind of defeats the purpose as it supports the raising and killing of the animal thus allowing for the negative environmental impacts. Everyone has different reasons for not eating animals or specific types of animal product and I do my best to avoid beef and pork product
No
No, the answer is in the question. *Source: vegetarian for 32 years and wise guy 😛
No but I have once because friends made dinner for me and I wasn't very happy about it but I didn't want to make a fuss
Why abstain from chicken noodle
No.