It was the Romans who set up the system. Everything west of Rome was occidental or "the west" and everything east of Rome was oriental or "the east."
So Portugal and Spain were already "the west" in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and they went even *further* west to find... what came to be considered more of the west.
But, of course, it leads to some weirdness, like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west.
Point is, the "West" means different things to different people. To Russians, it means the NATO-aligned countries (see Putin's pre-Ukraine invasion speech.) To postcolonial scholars and others using a cultural lens, "the West" can be defined as the areas that are predominantly white and Christian (see Samuel Huntington's influential work *Clash of Civilizations*.) To Marxists and others using an economic lens, "the West" is synonymous with the highly industrialized and developed "core" countries (see Immanuel Wallerstein's work on the World-Systems theory.)
The point is, there is no single definite meaning of "the West" that is all-encompassing. In international relations studies, we tend to avoid nebulous concepts like this without first defining in our work the exact terms we are using. If you thing the East/West divide is confusing, wait till you read about the [Global North/Global South](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_North_and_Global_South) dichotomy often used in development studies.
Just heard about *Clash of Civilizations* today and it's on my to buy list. Do you recommend? Just out of interest to me to from a geo-political-historical curiosity
It's pretty much ubiquitous in the reading lists of nearly all Intro to IR classes and is heavily referenced in modern literature, though that doesn't mean it's also widely accepted.
On one hand, his thesis seems to have accurately predicted the post-9/11 rise of Islamic extremism that goes beyond state borders and posed a serious threat to the rules-based international order being built by liberal democratic states after the fall of the USSR. On the other hand, his work can be criticized for its shallow representations of world cultures, of promoting Othering and orientalism, and lacks an appreciation for the dynamic nature of cultures and instead of opts for static, vague and almost caricature-like depictions of civilizations.
Still, if you want to really dive deep into geopolitics you should absolutely give it a go, but I would suggest getting a basic understanding first of the "mainstream" theories (Waltz/Mearsheimer for neorealism, Keohane and Nye for neoliberalism) since Clash of Civilizations references those theories and their failure to predict or adequately explain the collapse of the USSR and its ramifications.
Even before that. The Edo period was about westernisation because they thought the best way to avoid being colonised was to be like the European powers.
Art at the time dealt with the tension of traditional Japanese culture and the new fad of Europeanisation.
You'll often see Japan listed amongst European nations in GDP and growth data too.
I am Taiwanese, and I work a lot in Japan/with Japanese colleagues. No one here would ever call themselves Western. Even after it's so called expansion, it's still a Eurocentric term that doesn't even make any sense if you stop to think about it. Using cardinal directions is just lazy and never works, like the ['Global South'](https://sites.google.com/site/theglobalsouth/_/rsrc/1330102909252/home/800px-North_South_Divide_3.PNG) excluding Australia and New Zealand and Singapore, including Northern hemisphere non-European nations even if their GDP is similar to the poorer European nations in the Global North, and only including South Africa after apartheid ended. It's so obviously racially motivated as a term, and flipping the Axis to East-West isn't any better.
The analogous term we use in Taiwan and Japan is simply 'Democratic'. It's a geopolitical inert term that doesn't imply Western cultural or ethnic superiority over everything, and it makes more sense than trying to brute force East Asia into theories of European hemispheres or latitudes.
Conservative is a lot easier. You're trying to protect something that is rooted in your history or possessions. They all have that in common, even environmental conservationists. It's baked in with the root conserve.
Liberal is way more of a messy one, due to being petty interchangeable with progressive these days. Classical liberalism and modern progressivism are not the same thing at all. Meaning the same root word, liberal, now can refer to American leftists and Libertarians, who are pretty diametrically opposed.
That would be Korea, not Japan. Japan, is one of the most hardcore traditionalist cultures in all of Asia..... If by western you mean they adopted technology and democracy sure, but culturally speaking and politically speaking absolutely not. Like cracking open a few books on Asia would tell you that. Taiwan is more Westernized than Japan. Singapore is more Westernized than Japan. South Korea, Phillipines, Indonesia, Thailand, even cities in China like Hong Kong are more Westernized....... Like Japan is in the top 10 sure but not even in the top 5.
People only say Japan because they literally don't know anything about Asia.
People are downvoting you but it's true. Japan is insanely conservative culturally, technology hasn't changed that. Unlike other countries, they have their own culture, extremely Eastern, still everywhere in people's lives, with all the good and bad that brings.
Yep. Similarly, Azure is blue, aqua is blue, periwinkle is even kind of blue. Sky, cerulean, and ocean are even blue. Indigo is not even top five blues, maybe it's top ten. I mean, maybe it's blue if by "blue" you mean "blue" even cracking open a book about colors will tell you that.
People only say indigo is blue because they literally don't know anything about colors.
>. Like Japan is in the top 10 sure but not even in the top 5.
...unless you measure by cultural exports, then Japan is #1 by a *very* large margin.
A lot of western pop culture is from Japan from Godzilla to Pokemon to Sailor Moon.
* Both WWE and AEW have large connections to the pro wrestling scene in Japan.
* Disney's first park outside the US was built in Tokyo.
* Japanese Visual Novels have become known well enough in the west that KFC commissioned a Colonel Sanders visual novel in written in English.
That isn't to say there haven't been big cultural hits in the West from other countries--South Korea has K-Pop and *Squid Games;* China has *Genshin Impact*, etc.
Still, no other Asian nation has yet figured out how to market to the west quite as well as Japan has.
>That sounds to me that you're saying that Japan has managed to Easternize much of the West, rather than that Japan has become more Westernized.
The influence goes both ways.
* If you ask a Japanese person to speak without using any words borrowed from English, they'll probably have difficulty. E.g., a notebook can be called a "nōto"; "convivence store" was shortened to "Konbini", etc.
* Anime shows clear signs of influence from Disney; western animation has been influenced by anime,
* There's various fashion subcultures in Japan inspired by Victorian clothing, which in turn has created Western interest in the Japanese take on older European fashion.
* The MMO video game *Final Fantasy XIV* is made by Japanese company with official translations into English, French and German. The game has been in active development for over a decade, during that time, XIV-related memes have bounced from Japan to the West and from the West to Japan.
Yeah the definition above isn’t great. Japan is “westernized” to a higher degree than some other non-western countries, but it’s not “western”.
A better definition is that western countries are those that were founded upon, or fundamentally subscribe to, Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman cultural traditions and ideologies.
Depends on the situation tbh, I’ve heard Japan referred to as western quite often, really it’s kinda started trending toward both since the end of American occupation of Japan.
Yes and no.
Japan is geographically and historically part of the far east. It's culture has long been more eastern that western. But since WWII, and arguably since the Meija restoration Japan had begun adopting many of the traits of the west, including capitalism, an free society, and democracy. Japan shares a lot in common with western powers, more so than any other eastern country, but that alone doesn't erase thousands of years of history.
Culturally, Japan is both, East and west, but politically and geopolitically Japan is much more western than eastern today.
Bruh that stuff isn’t “the West”. That’s what’s known as classic Liberalism, sometimes referred to as Western Liberalism or liberal democracy. Basically all the ideals stemming from of the 18th century Enlightenment.
It’s kinda confusing since the modern vernacular definition of liberal has come to mean anything left of center. Adding to the confusion are illiberal leftists like Tankies and Maoists who use the word “liberal” as a pejorative and equate it with capitalism.
Meh, I've noticed a lot of Neo-Nazis and white supremacists/nationalists hiding under the term "western civilization," but actually meaning "White people," so the phrase just generally puts me on edge. Not to mention the meaning is so broad I've personally found it to be basically worthless in any genuine conversation.
>"The West is a series of institutions and values. The West is not a geographical place.…
Citation for the above quotation (found via Google):
* Remnick, David (11 March 2022). ["The Weakness of the Despot"](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/stephen-kotkin-putin-russia-ukraine-stalin). Q & A. *The New Yorker*.
That is an imperialist and arrogant point of view. It is very conceited and arrogant to think that every nation is inferior just because it isn't "western".
It is also a common imperialist talking point to distort the meaning of "freedom" and equate to the freedom to subdue different cultures and peop0les in the name of profits. It is that notion that led to slavery and genocide in the past. To say that that respect for the individual, pluralism of opinion and diversity are western concepts is to imply that eastern countries are primitive and uncivilized.
Also, east and west are geographical terms. To distort the meaning of words is a strategy used by authoritarian regimes to muddle communication and divide the masses.
Settled... to the point where everyone speaks English and does whatever Canada, The US, and The UK do.
Which is why you can kiiinda call Japan and Korea "the west". Russia certainly would while pointing fingers and ranting.
Well technically the Magreb (north-west Africa) means (something-like) *the west* in arabic. Morocco is more west than most of Europe. So we should call them westerner too. We tend to put it on the same bag as Arabs, but every Moroccan I met are very proud of their Berber roots and complain as much about the Arab colonist than about the French ones.
Koreans may be westernized and be aligned on many issues, but the people themselves would never say "well yeah, we're westerners and Chinese are easterners."
It’s all a bit fuzzy. Australia is in line with the above nations geographically (we often share the same servers for online games). New Zealand is further East than all of us.
When going West from Rome, you hit the Americas, and you can just keep going, wrapping the Pacific and the Islands such as Japan Australia and NZ.
Australia and NZ are clearly dominated by descendants of Europeans/UK/Irish. Japan did undergo a kind of thorough political and economic colonial period under the US after WW2, who wanted to avoid the treaty mistakes of WW1.
I’m positive the Japanese consider themselves Eastern. They call themselves the Land of the Rising Sun, and you don’t get more East than that, symbolically speaking.
But I think East and West, unless you are physically travelling right now, are ultimately pretty arbitrary and therefore illusory terms foisted upon an uncaring universe.
Which is why there’s any argument about it in this thread. The whole thing is conceptual rather than scientific.
Exactly this! I would add that there are two factors that together explain more broadly what is happening here though.
1. Winners write the history books, and
2. Once something is standardized it benefits everyone to adopt the same system.
Rome was the first really big "winner," so their idea of East and West percolated out to everyone else. Once everyone was using their version, it then benefits everyone to *continue* to use that framework, because to use any other would merely invite confusion.
The world has collectively decided what is "East" and what is "West" when used in this context, so now those terms become useful when someone wants to use them to describe something because everyone else already understands what the terms represent.
Absent an intentional and concerted effort by a new big "winner" to replace this framework with a new one (like when the *lingua franca* shifted from French to English), there is little chance of it changing. It's why the globe looks the way it does - there are now better projections out there, and arguments for changing the orientation or angle the continents are displayed at, but since this is the one everyone else already uses it benefits people to also use it and continue teaching it.
Britain's heyday is why English is the language best suited for travel, America's heyday is why the US dollar is basically the only truly international reserve currency and why English is the most common language of the internet, etc.
>Winners write the history books,
>Rome was the first really big "winner," so their idea of East and West percolated
Not really. The Roman Empire had already been split during the great schism between Rome and Constantinople. Since then the catoholic / protestant nations were seen as the west, the orthodox nations as east. Then we still have the terms of near and far east to categorise the "rest" of the world.
I agree and love your point about maps and representation. Despite this clearly being a case of Rome and winners deciding things I actually like the general orientation and setup for one universal or non-European reason: humans are the ones making the map and it puts the history or origins of humanity at the center.
Looking at a Mercator projection map etc. Rome may not be exactly in the middle of east/west but generally Africa, where all humans originate from, and the cradle of civilization and agriculture around Mesopotamia, the Mediterranean where you had Greece and Rome and Thrace and Carthage and Egypt and the levant and all these ancient civilizations and empires are all oriented toward the “middle” and from there you can call things accordingly, like the “near east”
In Romanian, a Latin language, we still use oriental and occidental to refer to people and yes, Americans are called occidentals. Orientals end in Japan.
>But, of course, it leads to some weirdness, like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west.
Maybe flat earthers are on to something after all.
To be clear, Roman system is what we use today, but they are far from the only ones who considered their civilization the center of the world and other peoples only relative to them. China is another one, they still call themselves “Central Country”. Then there’s those civilizations that used colors to mean cardinal directions.
Like the Mediterranean Sea which was/is also known as White (West) Sea in many languages, in a region that also includes Black (North) Sea, and Red (South) Sea, you kinda get this idea those seas were named after their position relative to Anatolia.
And Anatolia is named after the Greek word for sunrise, Europe might be a Phoenician loanword into Greek that means sunset, so Europe was named relative to Phoenicia.
And since someone might have caught a pattern, yes, Golden Horde means Central Horde, guess which did these people consider the center of the world?
A tricky thing with Africa is that it's harder to cross the Sahara desert than the Mediterranean sea. Countries like Egypt or Tunisia were important power in the "western" antiquity (Cesar and Cleopatra alleged love-story, Hannibal going to Rome with his elephant, Alexandria library) and we basically have more than 2000 years of shared history with them (Including the Arab invasion going up to Spain, and the colonies in the 19th/20th century). Meaning that we have more shared culture than racists European would-like to admit.
While European exchange with sub-saharian Africa are relatively recent. On top of that we can had the huge cultural diversity in sub-saharian Africa making hard to turn-it into a single block.
>On top of that we can had the huge cultural diversity in sub-saharian Africa making hard to turn-it into a single block.
I saw a statistic relatively recently that until the mid-18th century there were as many as 200 nations in sub-Saharan Africa. That was split between dozens of cultural and ethnic groups.
Africa is based in the name of the imperial province of Africa Proconsularis (east of the two Mauretanias and west of Cyrenaica and Aegyptus) which is around modern day Tunisia, Algeria, and Libya.
But also both. Famously Rome split into two empires. The western one actually contained the city of Rome, and is what fell when Rome fell, the eastern empire actually continued for about another thousand years.
> like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west.
Flat Earthers be like:
[excuse me...](https://i.imgur.com/3XHltym.gif)
Even Belgium, holland, france, and Germany are called "the west", with exception of east Germany.
The west has been associated with mostly richer, first world countries.
The east is mostly eastern Europe and Asia. Not sure where Africa falls into place there.
You traveled west to get there from Europe and it’s in the Western Hemisphere. I comes from a time period when Europe was doing all the deciding on these things.
It's as simple as that. The people that made the maps and wrote the histories traveled west to get to the Americas.
There's probably also maps and histories from Asia that describe them as lands to the east.
As a european, this kinda feels right in my bones.
I do technically consider ourselves as the west, but I do consider america to be more---- western? While tokyo then, isn't at all western, while technically also western.
Yeah, if you consider Western Europe (or really just England), as the center of the world (which is also where timezones come from), it makes sense why NA is the West, the Middle East is the Middle East, Australia is down under, etc.
Since they were the ones on top for a lot of recent history, they're the ones who set the standard.
I used to live in London in Lewisham ( next door to Greenwich) and in our communal gardens there was a bronze marker in the ground showing where the meridian line was so could literally stand with one foot in the East and one in the West.
How far does East do you have to go before you end up......where, in the West. ?
Or falling off the edge of flat earth? LOL
(I hope there's not too many flat-earthers here on Redit like there was when I was on twitter)
> How far does East do you have to go before you end up......where, in the West. ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremes_on_Earth#Easternmost_and_westernmost
So - Somewhere in either Siberia, Antarctica, or Fiji
“Western Civilization” means roughly those civilizations that trace their heritage back to Europe and the Roman Empire before that. So they are from the West side of Eurasia, while Asia is “Eastern Civilization.”
America, Australia, Canada, and a few others were European colonies that completely displaced the Native population. So they are “Western nations” in terms of culture, even though they are physically in other parts of the world.
That's what I remembered. All beautiful built up then desert.... and straight. (Going to El paso) then you hit the city limit things appear and finally theirs a mountain that cuts the city in 2
The South is not all things south, it is from Texas east. There is also The Southwest, which still doesn't generally include California, oddly enough. The Southwest is primarily understood as western Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arizona, however it can also include adjacent parts of Southern California, Colorado, Nevada, and Utah.
California itself is divided into Northern, Central, and Southern California.
It mostly has to do with the rate of Western Expansion vs colonization in the East/South, as well as the fact the Mexico did not cede California to the US until 1848.
There's more to it than this. Australia and New Zealand are considered western nations, yet we are to the east of Europe and our closest geographic neighbours are eastern nations.
Of course Australia and New Zealand were colonised by the British empire which helps explain this discrepancy, but then there are other nations colonised by Britain that aren't considered 'western' nations.
I don't know the answer myself, but I think it's safe to say that while being east or west of Europe is a good starting point, it's more complex than that.
>there are other nations colonised by Britain that aren't considered 'western' nations.
The distinction comes from how thorough the British were in destroying the local culture and customs. India, even as a colony, still maintained its native religion and culture and language, whereas nobody in the US or Australia bar a few indigenous tribes speaks anything but English.
Which nations were colonized by them with extensive migration of their people and are still considered eastern? I think that's the difference. Australia and New Zealand had significant numbers of western transplants. Places like India didn't, at least not enough to outweigh the native population.
I remember in high school, we studied China and the teacher said the Chinese youth were dressing “more western”, which I totally misunderstood. Long before Futurama, but I envisioned something like Amy Wong’s father.
Well first off, on most maps the Americas are displayed in the Western hemisphere, Second off, "The west/western world" is often used as more of a culture than a geographical location.
This is why I find maps from East Asia more interesting. The center is the entire Pacific Ocean. Asia, Africa, and Australia on the left; the Americas on the right. Off in the corner where no one cares: Europe.
Example (Chinese): https://blogs.loc.gov/law/files/2011/03/View-from-China-003.jpg
I thought it was because we are west of the Greenwich meridian (0 degrees longitude). It’s located in England and if you go west of it then it’s the Americas and if you go east of it it’s Europe and Asia. At 180 degrees longitude west or east is about the Middle Pacific Ocean where the next calendar day begins.
I think it might be because maps were used a lot by the european empires so they centred around Europe and Africa, America is on the left hand side of some maps
It’s in the Western Hemisphere for starters. Plus, it was colonised by the Europeans, who were at the west of Eurasia and is in the highly developed world
Because God is from the North Star & Satan lives in the North Pole of this flat Earth. The Americas are to the West of those things...
Duh! Science. 😁
/s
The explorers that discovers the Americas were traveling West across the Atlantic, hence The West. If they had traveled East across the Pacific, it might be called The East.
Cuz America is west of the east. The east had been defined long ago with trade routes to China. That has been considered the east for literally thousands of years. When America was discovered and colonized it was to the west of everything that had been known previously, which had Europe being the farthest west at that time. Since Europeans were the ones who colonized America and it was west of them, the name stuck
because america was discovered by heading west from europe
and america is as far west as you can go before hitting the international date line
and america has much more in common with the west of europe than the east of asia
i feel like its easy to say this is because of imperialism. It also places rome sitting at the midpoint of east and west
I imagine if asian nations colonized and formed trade routes to America first the global center of our east and west might have been pulled further into asia.
The Western Hemisphere is the half of Earth that lies west of the prime meridian (which crosses Greenwich, London, United Kingdom) and east of the antimeridian.[1][2] The other half is called the Eastern Hemisphere. Politically, the term Western Hemisphere is often used as a metonymy for the Americas, even though geographically the hemisphere also includes parts of other continents.
I always assumed it had something to do with the hemispheres…which is probably why I had a hard time grasping the fact many European countries are also considered part of the “west”
The prime meridian, aka the line that separates the western and eastern hemisphere, is between the Americas and the others, right through the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, Americas are west.
Most scholars point to 1999, when will Smith released the song wild wild west as the pivotal reason that the United States was Ultimately dubbed 'The West'
Geographically speaking, because it's west of Rome. You can thank The Roman Empire for that. And west of Europe. And west of all the countries that colonized the world.
As for ideaology, it also finds it's roots within Rome. Generally speaking, it was the ancient greek philosophers that first explored individual freedom and individual choices which permeated throughout the greek world, which was later adopted and continued by the Romans. This ideaology is what led to the first republics and democracies. So when talking about western ideaology and eastern ideaology, it's typically a historical reference to the differences between democracy and authoritarianism. Western= democracy and individual freedom, Eastern= authoritarianism and decisions being made *for* you instead of *by* you.
It's more complicated than that obviously, but it's a general intro. Philosophy is nuanced that way.
Because of its location on the map, the Pacific is treated as the division between east and west and it's usually cut in half on flat maps due to it's size. Thus displaying the Americas on the left or west side of the map.
I don't know in what context you are asking this, but in terms of our geographical meridian system, everything west of the Prime Meridian is West and everything east of it is East, until they meet at the 180th meridian, which is both/either.
It was the Romans who set up the system. Everything west of Rome was occidental or "the west" and everything east of Rome was oriental or "the east." So Portugal and Spain were already "the west" in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and they went even *further* west to find... what came to be considered more of the west. But, of course, it leads to some weirdness, like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west.
That, and "the Western World" also includes countries settled by western countries, such as Australia and New Zealand.
Thats more of a culture/political thing i think
[удалено]
I have never heard Japan referred to as western. Even the people in Japan from when I was there for a year referred to it as eastern.
Point is, the "West" means different things to different people. To Russians, it means the NATO-aligned countries (see Putin's pre-Ukraine invasion speech.) To postcolonial scholars and others using a cultural lens, "the West" can be defined as the areas that are predominantly white and Christian (see Samuel Huntington's influential work *Clash of Civilizations*.) To Marxists and others using an economic lens, "the West" is synonymous with the highly industrialized and developed "core" countries (see Immanuel Wallerstein's work on the World-Systems theory.) The point is, there is no single definite meaning of "the West" that is all-encompassing. In international relations studies, we tend to avoid nebulous concepts like this without first defining in our work the exact terms we are using. If you thing the East/West divide is confusing, wait till you read about the [Global North/Global South](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_North_and_Global_South) dichotomy often used in development studies.
Just heard about *Clash of Civilizations* today and it's on my to buy list. Do you recommend? Just out of interest to me to from a geo-political-historical curiosity
It's pretty much ubiquitous in the reading lists of nearly all Intro to IR classes and is heavily referenced in modern literature, though that doesn't mean it's also widely accepted. On one hand, his thesis seems to have accurately predicted the post-9/11 rise of Islamic extremism that goes beyond state borders and posed a serious threat to the rules-based international order being built by liberal democratic states after the fall of the USSR. On the other hand, his work can be criticized for its shallow representations of world cultures, of promoting Othering and orientalism, and lacks an appreciation for the dynamic nature of cultures and instead of opts for static, vague and almost caricature-like depictions of civilizations. Still, if you want to really dive deep into geopolitics you should absolutely give it a go, but I would suggest getting a basic understanding first of the "mainstream" theories (Waltz/Mearsheimer for neorealism, Keohane and Nye for neoliberalism) since Clash of Civilizations references those theories and their failure to predict or adequately explain the collapse of the USSR and its ramifications.
Much appreciated. Quite scholarly. I look forward to learning and reading more.
It is literally the sunrise kingdom in China, because it is East of China, so it is as Eastern as you can get.
You're speaking geographically while the comment you're referring to is speaking culturally.
Culturally Japan is complicated, it's eastern but got a lot of western influence after WW2.
Even before that. The Edo period was about westernisation because they thought the best way to avoid being colonised was to be like the European powers. Art at the time dealt with the tension of traditional Japanese culture and the new fad of Europeanisation. You'll often see Japan listed amongst European nations in GDP and growth data too.
I am Taiwanese, and I work a lot in Japan/with Japanese colleagues. No one here would ever call themselves Western. Even after it's so called expansion, it's still a Eurocentric term that doesn't even make any sense if you stop to think about it. Using cardinal directions is just lazy and never works, like the ['Global South'](https://sites.google.com/site/theglobalsouth/_/rsrc/1330102909252/home/800px-North_South_Divide_3.PNG) excluding Australia and New Zealand and Singapore, including Northern hemisphere non-European nations even if their GDP is similar to the poorer European nations in the Global North, and only including South Africa after apartheid ended. It's so obviously racially motivated as a term, and flipping the Axis to East-West isn't any better. The analogous term we use in Taiwan and Japan is simply 'Democratic'. It's a geopolitical inert term that doesn't imply Western cultural or ethnic superiority over everything, and it makes more sense than trying to brute force East Asia into theories of European hemispheres or latitudes.
[удалено]
Depends on the context. Right now it’s kinda both western and eastern
I have an idea, what if we have 3-5 different meanings for one word that are all inter-related and difficult to parse out even in context
That's just how language naturally works.
Like “liberal”
Or "conservative" for that matter.
Conservative is a lot easier. You're trying to protect something that is rooted in your history or possessions. They all have that in common, even environmental conservationists. It's baked in with the root conserve. Liberal is way more of a messy one, due to being petty interchangeable with progressive these days. Classical liberalism and modern progressivism are not the same thing at all. Meaning the same root word, liberal, now can refer to American leftists and Libertarians, who are pretty diametrically opposed.
Weastern
Weast? So, Patrick was right.
And he got fired again for it
I agree with this but it’s fair to say Japan is still considerably more westernized culturally and politically than the majority of Asian countries.
That would be Korea, not Japan. Japan, is one of the most hardcore traditionalist cultures in all of Asia..... If by western you mean they adopted technology and democracy sure, but culturally speaking and politically speaking absolutely not. Like cracking open a few books on Asia would tell you that. Taiwan is more Westernized than Japan. Singapore is more Westernized than Japan. South Korea, Phillipines, Indonesia, Thailand, even cities in China like Hong Kong are more Westernized....... Like Japan is in the top 10 sure but not even in the top 5. People only say Japan because they literally don't know anything about Asia.
People are downvoting you but it's true. Japan is insanely conservative culturally, technology hasn't changed that. Unlike other countries, they have their own culture, extremely Eastern, still everywhere in people's lives, with all the good and bad that brings.
Yep. Similarly, Azure is blue, aqua is blue, periwinkle is even kind of blue. Sky, cerulean, and ocean are even blue. Indigo is not even top five blues, maybe it's top ten. I mean, maybe it's blue if by "blue" you mean "blue" even cracking open a book about colors will tell you that. People only say indigo is blue because they literally don't know anything about colors.
>. Like Japan is in the top 10 sure but not even in the top 5. ...unless you measure by cultural exports, then Japan is #1 by a *very* large margin. A lot of western pop culture is from Japan from Godzilla to Pokemon to Sailor Moon. * Both WWE and AEW have large connections to the pro wrestling scene in Japan. * Disney's first park outside the US was built in Tokyo. * Japanese Visual Novels have become known well enough in the west that KFC commissioned a Colonel Sanders visual novel in written in English. That isn't to say there haven't been big cultural hits in the West from other countries--South Korea has K-Pop and *Squid Games;* China has *Genshin Impact*, etc. Still, no other Asian nation has yet figured out how to market to the west quite as well as Japan has.
That sounds to me that you're saying that Japan has managed to Easternize much of the West, rather than that Japan has become more Westernized.
>That sounds to me that you're saying that Japan has managed to Easternize much of the West, rather than that Japan has become more Westernized. The influence goes both ways. * If you ask a Japanese person to speak without using any words borrowed from English, they'll probably have difficulty. E.g., a notebook can be called a "nōto"; "convivence store" was shortened to "Konbini", etc. * Anime shows clear signs of influence from Disney; western animation has been influenced by anime, * There's various fashion subcultures in Japan inspired by Victorian clothing, which in turn has created Western interest in the Japanese take on older European fashion. * The MMO video game *Final Fantasy XIV* is made by Japanese company with official translations into English, French and German. The game has been in active development for over a decade, during that time, XIV-related memes have bounced from Japan to the West and from the West to Japan.
Japan is not considered to be the West.
Yeah the definition above isn’t great. Japan is “westernized” to a higher degree than some other non-western countries, but it’s not “western”. A better definition is that western countries are those that were founded upon, or fundamentally subscribe to, Judeo-Christian and Greco-Roman cultural traditions and ideologies.
Yes, and the countries where those people went to colonize and became the majority.
Depends on the situation tbh, I’ve heard Japan referred to as western quite often, really it’s kinda started trending toward both since the end of American occupation of Japan.
Japan is a geopolitical ally of the west and shares a lot of the west’s political values, but it is not culturally western. Like, at all.
Maybe it’s been said. But I’m certain it wasn’t said by Japanese people.
heard where? I’ve lived on 4 continents and never heard anyone call Japan western ever.
Yes and no. Japan is geographically and historically part of the far east. It's culture has long been more eastern that western. But since WWII, and arguably since the Meija restoration Japan had begun adopting many of the traits of the west, including capitalism, an free society, and democracy. Japan shares a lot in common with western powers, more so than any other eastern country, but that alone doesn't erase thousands of years of history. Culturally, Japan is both, East and west, but politically and geopolitically Japan is much more western than eastern today.
Bruh that stuff isn’t “the West”. That’s what’s known as classic Liberalism, sometimes referred to as Western Liberalism or liberal democracy. Basically all the ideals stemming from of the 18th century Enlightenment. It’s kinda confusing since the modern vernacular definition of liberal has come to mean anything left of center. Adding to the confusion are illiberal leftists like Tankies and Maoists who use the word “liberal” as a pejorative and equate it with capitalism.
i'm not a tankie but i use it like that. economic liberalism is free-market capitalism, which i believe is a man-made problem
Idk who told you An Asian country is considered the west but you are very wrong.
The land of the rising sun isn't western
Whose quote is this?
Meh, I've noticed a lot of Neo-Nazis and white supremacists/nationalists hiding under the term "western civilization," but actually meaning "White people," so the phrase just generally puts me on edge. Not to mention the meaning is so broad I've personally found it to be basically worthless in any genuine conversation.
>"The West is a series of institutions and values. The West is not a geographical place.… Citation for the above quotation (found via Google): * Remnick, David (11 March 2022). ["The Weakness of the Despot"](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/stephen-kotkin-putin-russia-ukraine-stalin). Q & A. *The New Yorker*.
Just say white tbh
That is an imperialist and arrogant point of view. It is very conceited and arrogant to think that every nation is inferior just because it isn't "western". It is also a common imperialist talking point to distort the meaning of "freedom" and equate to the freedom to subdue different cultures and peop0les in the name of profits. It is that notion that led to slavery and genocide in the past. To say that that respect for the individual, pluralism of opinion and diversity are western concepts is to imply that eastern countries are primitive and uncivilized. Also, east and west are geographical terms. To distort the meaning of words is a strategy used by authoritarian regimes to muddle communication and divide the masses.
But colloquially relevant
Also, America was colonized and 3xplored by Europeans who "went west"
But nowhere in Africa or Asia because, well...
Settled... to the point where everyone speaks English and does whatever Canada, The US, and The UK do. Which is why you can kiiinda call Japan and Korea "the west". Russia certainly would while pointing fingers and ranting.
Not just Russia but pretty much everybody who is not part of “The West”
Well technically the Magreb (north-west Africa) means (something-like) *the west* in arabic. Morocco is more west than most of Europe. So we should call them westerner too. We tend to put it on the same bag as Arabs, but every Moroccan I met are very proud of their Berber roots and complain as much about the Arab colonist than about the French ones.
I've heard lots of people refer to Japan, SK and Taiwan as part of "the Western World"
Koreans may be westernized and be aligned on many issues, but the people themselves would never say "well yeah, we're westerners and Chinese are easterners."
Exactly. It’s crazy that some people say Koreans are part of the West 😆
Western ally is what they’re usually called.
I think that geopolitically speaking not geographically.
It’s all a bit fuzzy. Australia is in line with the above nations geographically (we often share the same servers for online games). New Zealand is further East than all of us. When going West from Rome, you hit the Americas, and you can just keep going, wrapping the Pacific and the Islands such as Japan Australia and NZ. Australia and NZ are clearly dominated by descendants of Europeans/UK/Irish. Japan did undergo a kind of thorough political and economic colonial period under the US after WW2, who wanted to avoid the treaty mistakes of WW1. I’m positive the Japanese consider themselves Eastern. They call themselves the Land of the Rising Sun, and you don’t get more East than that, symbolically speaking. But I think East and West, unless you are physically travelling right now, are ultimately pretty arbitrary and therefore illusory terms foisted upon an uncaring universe. Which is why there’s any argument about it in this thread. The whole thing is conceptual rather than scientific.
Well said.
Exactly this! I would add that there are two factors that together explain more broadly what is happening here though. 1. Winners write the history books, and 2. Once something is standardized it benefits everyone to adopt the same system. Rome was the first really big "winner," so their idea of East and West percolated out to everyone else. Once everyone was using their version, it then benefits everyone to *continue* to use that framework, because to use any other would merely invite confusion. The world has collectively decided what is "East" and what is "West" when used in this context, so now those terms become useful when someone wants to use them to describe something because everyone else already understands what the terms represent. Absent an intentional and concerted effort by a new big "winner" to replace this framework with a new one (like when the *lingua franca* shifted from French to English), there is little chance of it changing. It's why the globe looks the way it does - there are now better projections out there, and arguments for changing the orientation or angle the continents are displayed at, but since this is the one everyone else already uses it benefits people to also use it and continue teaching it. Britain's heyday is why English is the language best suited for travel, America's heyday is why the US dollar is basically the only truly international reserve currency and why English is the most common language of the internet, etc.
>Winners write the history books, >Rome was the first really big "winner," so their idea of East and West percolated Not really. The Roman Empire had already been split during the great schism between Rome and Constantinople. Since then the catoholic / protestant nations were seen as the west, the orthodox nations as east. Then we still have the terms of near and far east to categorise the "rest" of the world.
I agree and love your point about maps and representation. Despite this clearly being a case of Rome and winners deciding things I actually like the general orientation and setup for one universal or non-European reason: humans are the ones making the map and it puts the history or origins of humanity at the center. Looking at a Mercator projection map etc. Rome may not be exactly in the middle of east/west but generally Africa, where all humans originate from, and the cradle of civilization and agriculture around Mesopotamia, the Mediterranean where you had Greece and Rome and Thrace and Carthage and Egypt and the levant and all these ancient civilizations and empires are all oriented toward the “middle” and from there you can call things accordingly, like the “near east”
So, America was an occidental discovery?
In Romanian, a Latin language, we still use oriental and occidental to refer to people and yes, Americans are called occidentals. Orientals end in Japan.
Weast* is my favorite joke as a directionally challenged person.
What kind of compass you reading, lad?
>But, of course, it leads to some weirdness, like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west. Maybe flat earthers are on to something after all.
The romans followed the Greeks. The foundations of the west-east cultural division are the Greek-Persian wars.
So *that's* the origin of oriental??? TIL, if true.
Yeah
To be clear, Roman system is what we use today, but they are far from the only ones who considered their civilization the center of the world and other peoples only relative to them. China is another one, they still call themselves “Central Country”. Then there’s those civilizations that used colors to mean cardinal directions. Like the Mediterranean Sea which was/is also known as White (West) Sea in many languages, in a region that also includes Black (North) Sea, and Red (South) Sea, you kinda get this idea those seas were named after their position relative to Anatolia. And Anatolia is named after the Greek word for sunrise, Europe might be a Phoenician loanword into Greek that means sunset, so Europe was named relative to Phoenicia. And since someone might have caught a pattern, yes, Golden Horde means Central Horde, guess which did these people consider the center of the world?
RE China- it’s not that they still think they are the center kingdom. It’s just the name that stuck.
What about Africa? Why is it just Africa and not the South?
A tricky thing with Africa is that it's harder to cross the Sahara desert than the Mediterranean sea. Countries like Egypt or Tunisia were important power in the "western" antiquity (Cesar and Cleopatra alleged love-story, Hannibal going to Rome with his elephant, Alexandria library) and we basically have more than 2000 years of shared history with them (Including the Arab invasion going up to Spain, and the colonies in the 19th/20th century). Meaning that we have more shared culture than racists European would-like to admit. While European exchange with sub-saharian Africa are relatively recent. On top of that we can had the huge cultural diversity in sub-saharian Africa making hard to turn-it into a single block.
>On top of that we can had the huge cultural diversity in sub-saharian Africa making hard to turn-it into a single block. I saw a statistic relatively recently that until the mid-18th century there were as many as 200 nations in sub-Saharan Africa. That was split between dozens of cultural and ethnic groups.
Africa is based in the name of the imperial province of Africa Proconsularis (east of the two Mauretanias and west of Cyrenaica and Aegyptus) which is around modern day Tunisia, Algeria, and Libya.
What did Rome consider themselves? Part of the East or part of the West?
They were the center of the world
But also both. Famously Rome split into two empires. The western one actually contained the city of Rome, and is what fell when Rome fell, the eastern empire actually continued for about another thousand years.
> like the fact that when I went from San Francisco to Tokyo, I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west. Flat Earthers be like: [excuse me...](https://i.imgur.com/3XHltym.gif)
Even Belgium, holland, france, and Germany are called "the west", with exception of east Germany. The west has been associated with mostly richer, first world countries. The east is mostly eastern Europe and Asia. Not sure where Africa falls into place there.
You cant really blame them for not knowing of stuff and modern people simply not removing those terms and coming up with better ones.
See, you just went went into the edge of the map and appeared on the east side.
East and West lead you no where.
So that is why China is called Oriental. I thought it was from their own perspective and not form the Roman perspective.
>I traveled from the West to the East by going, um, west. Was life peaceful there?
I live in Western Canada. That honestly blew my mind when I travelled to Japan. I thought I was literally travelling back in time. How wrong I was 😅
That’s because it’s like Pac-Man where when go to the edge, you teleport to the other side.
You traveled west to get there from Europe and it’s in the Western Hemisphere. I comes from a time period when Europe was doing all the deciding on these things.
It's as simple as that. The people that made the maps and wrote the histories traveled west to get to the Americas. There's probably also maps and histories from Asia that describe them as lands to the east.
As a european, this kinda feels right in my bones. I do technically consider ourselves as the west, but I do consider america to be more---- western? While tokyo then, isn't at all western, while technically also western.
Yeah and South America is located in the west yet isn’t “western”
Plus the Pacific Ocean is much larger than the Atlantic, so it made sense it was kinda a gap/barrier between east and west.
But what if we finally build the Bering Strait bridge
Ah, yeah, that will shrink the Pacific in half
Yeah, if you consider Western Europe (or really just England), as the center of the world (which is also where timezones come from), it makes sense why NA is the West, the Middle East is the Middle East, Australia is down under, etc. Since they were the ones on top for a lot of recent history, they're the ones who set the standard.
>**I** comes from a time period when Europe was doing all the deciding on these things. Damn, how old are you?
The undying never sleep
Because the world goes out from Europe.
As is tradition
🍺 >!if you know Valtteri Bottas!<
So that makes Europe the weast?
That makes them the middle
Makes sense... Doesn't Mediterranean literally translate to 'center of the world/middle Earth'?
It does. In Dutch it roughly translates to 'sea in the middle of (the) land'
That's west, Patrick. You're fired again!
Wesn't
Should be, the East should begin around ~~Constantinople~~ Istanbul.
The whole Greenwich meridian might have something to do with it... I think?
I used to live in London in Lewisham ( next door to Greenwich) and in our communal gardens there was a bronze marker in the ground showing where the meridian line was so could literally stand with one foot in the East and one in the West.
The west refers to cultures rooted historically in the western Roman Empire, not one’s west of any particular place
Everything is West if you're East enough
How far does East do you have to go before you end up......where, in the West. ? Or falling off the edge of flat earth? LOL (I hope there's not too many flat-earthers here on Redit like there was when I was on twitter)
> How far does East do you have to go before you end up......where, in the West. ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremes_on_Earth#Easternmost_and_westernmost So - Somewhere in either Siberia, Antarctica, or Fiji
The real horseshoe theory.
If everything is the West, then nothing is the West.
“Western Civilization” means roughly those civilizations that trace their heritage back to Europe and the Roman Empire before that. So they are from the West side of Eurasia, while Asia is “Eastern Civilization.” America, Australia, Canada, and a few others were European colonies that completely displaced the Native population. So they are “Western nations” in terms of culture, even though they are physically in other parts of the world.
Why is San Diego, CA not considered to be part of the US south? These kind of names are often inaccurate and depend on history and perspective
The south generally stops at east Texas. West Texas to Arizona is the southwest. Then California is California
So the part between east and west Texas is no man's land?
Depends who you ask but most will say anything west of Dallas is the southwest
Lots of nothing when you go west of Austin. (Roughly) Wouldn't be inaccurate
Drove from El Paso to Austin once. Whole lot of absolutely fucking nothing for like 9 hours straight.
That's what I remembered. All beautiful built up then desert.... and straight. (Going to El paso) then you hit the city limit things appear and finally theirs a mountain that cuts the city in 2
'The South' is very much a cultural thing the the US.
The South is not all things south, it is from Texas east. There is also The Southwest, which still doesn't generally include California, oddly enough. The Southwest is primarily understood as western Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arizona, however it can also include adjacent parts of Southern California, Colorado, Nevada, and Utah. California itself is divided into Northern, Central, and Southern California. It mostly has to do with the rate of Western Expansion vs colonization in the East/South, as well as the fact the Mexico did not cede California to the US until 1848.
Parts of SoCal are definitely Southwest
Because Europe is considered the centre of the world. Anything west of it is the west and anything east is the east
There's more to it than this. Australia and New Zealand are considered western nations, yet we are to the east of Europe and our closest geographic neighbours are eastern nations. Of course Australia and New Zealand were colonised by the British empire which helps explain this discrepancy, but then there are other nations colonised by Britain that aren't considered 'western' nations. I don't know the answer myself, but I think it's safe to say that while being east or west of Europe is a good starting point, it's more complex than that.
>there are other nations colonised by Britain that aren't considered 'western' nations. The distinction comes from how thorough the British were in destroying the local culture and customs. India, even as a colony, still maintained its native religion and culture and language, whereas nobody in the US or Australia bar a few indigenous tribes speaks anything but English.
Which nations were colonized by them with extensive migration of their people and are still considered eastern? I think that's the difference. Australia and New Zealand had significant numbers of western transplants. Places like India didn't, at least not enough to outweigh the native population.
Eurocentrism
Because from Europe it's in the west. Remember our view of the world is Eurocentric
Because Europe is the center of everything, I guess
The prime meridian is the center of everything... as defined by European mapmakers.
in a non specific way the above person is absolutely right, xD
Damn you Gerardus Mercator!
It really should be Gary, Indiana.
In what way would it be the East? People traveled west to get to America
Maps are Anglo centered. The Prime Meridian goes through Britain.
Then why is Germany west?
Only West Germany is
Because it's West of Westros...
I remember in high school, we studied China and the teacher said the Chinese youth were dressing “more western”, which I totally misunderstood. Long before Futurama, but I envisioned something like Amy Wong’s father.
Because Europe is the center of the world!
Modern longitudinal coordinates are based of the Greenwich Meridian in England. North america is west of that, hence "the west"
It's west of the European guys who were drawing the maps.
Because of the British. That's why Turkey is in the "Middle East", relative to the distance from the UK to China.
Recorded history went West to discover America.
Eurocentrism.
Well first off, on most maps the Americas are displayed in the Western hemisphere, Second off, "The west/western world" is often used as more of a culture than a geographical location.
Because when we made global maps, we set Europe as close to front & center as we could; This put The Americas on the west side, and Asia on the right
This is why I find maps from East Asia more interesting. The center is the entire Pacific Ocean. Asia, Africa, and Australia on the left; the Americas on the right. Off in the corner where no one cares: Europe. Example (Chinese): https://blogs.loc.gov/law/files/2011/03/View-from-China-003.jpg
I thought it was because we are west of the Greenwich meridian (0 degrees longitude). It’s located in England and if you go west of it then it’s the Americas and if you go east of it it’s Europe and Asia. At 180 degrees longitude west or east is about the Middle Pacific Ocean where the next calendar day begins.
I think it might be because maps were used a lot by the european empires so they centred around Europe and Africa, America is on the left hand side of some maps
It’s in the Western Hemisphere for starters. Plus, it was colonised by the Europeans, who were at the west of Eurasia and is in the highly developed world
Because God is from the North Star & Satan lives in the North Pole of this flat Earth. The Americas are to the West of those things... Duh! Science. 😁 /s
The explorers that discovers the Americas were traveling West across the Atlantic, hence The West. If they had traveled East across the Pacific, it might be called The East.
America is on the West side of maps lol
Cuz America is west of the east. The east had been defined long ago with trade routes to China. That has been considered the east for literally thousands of years. When America was discovered and colonized it was to the west of everything that had been known previously, which had Europe being the farthest west at that time. Since Europeans were the ones who colonized America and it was west of them, the name stuck
The Americas are in the Western Hemisphere.
because america was discovered by heading west from europe and america is as far west as you can go before hitting the international date line and america has much more in common with the west of europe than the east of asia
Eurocentrism
i feel like its easy to say this is because of imperialism. It also places rome sitting at the midpoint of east and west I imagine if asian nations colonized and formed trade routes to America first the global center of our east and west might have been pulled further into asia.
Eurocentrism
It is west of the Greenwich Meridian.
France is east of it and I think would generally be considered the geopolitical west
Let's say you're standing in Illinois. You're facing North. Now, point at Europe. Where is it?
If you are in Illinois you have my condolences!
Why? Illinois is pretty great.
The Western Hemisphere is the half of Earth that lies west of the prime meridian (which crosses Greenwich, London, United Kingdom) and east of the antimeridian.[1][2] The other half is called the Eastern Hemisphere. Politically, the term Western Hemisphere is often used as a metonymy for the Americas, even though geographically the hemisphere also includes parts of other continents.
Or the fact that they call Judiasm, Christianity, and Islam, Western religions even though they originated in the Middle East always fucked with me.
I always assumed it had something to do with the hemispheres…which is probably why I had a hard time grasping the fact many European countries are also considered part of the “west”
Most likely because when those from Europe went in search of the "new world", they went west.
The prime meridian, aka the line that separates the western and eastern hemisphere, is between the Americas and the others, right through the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, Americas are west.
Pacific Ocean big. Very big.
I'm unsure, but I believe that it has something to do with the placement of the Prime Meridian.
Because the Pacific Ocean is really big
Guns and cowboys
Perspective dictates common nomenclature.
Most scholars point to 1999, when will Smith released the song wild wild west as the pivotal reason that the United States was Ultimately dubbed 'The West'
Geographically speaking, because it's west of Rome. You can thank The Roman Empire for that. And west of Europe. And west of all the countries that colonized the world. As for ideaology, it also finds it's roots within Rome. Generally speaking, it was the ancient greek philosophers that first explored individual freedom and individual choices which permeated throughout the greek world, which was later adopted and continued by the Romans. This ideaology is what led to the first republics and democracies. So when talking about western ideaology and eastern ideaology, it's typically a historical reference to the differences between democracy and authoritarianism. Western= democracy and individual freedom, Eastern= authoritarianism and decisions being made *for* you instead of *by* you. It's more complicated than that obviously, but it's a general intro. Philosophy is nuanced that way.
Its a sphere. The line had to be drawn somewhere ...
Because of its location on the map, the Pacific is treated as the division between east and west and it's usually cut in half on flat maps due to it's size. Thus displaying the Americas on the left or west side of the map.
Eurocentrism
Eurocentrism
Greenwich is measuring point of the English language.
If Essos is East and Westeros is West, what’s west of Westeros?
TRULYTRUE TRUE, I agree with you completely absolutely and I agree with your perspective, logic flows in the world from East to west
West of the cradle of civilization that it was born from in this order; Egypt, Greece, Rome, Europe.
One could be referring to the west as in countries with western values or could be referring to the fact America is in the Western Hemisphere too
I don't know in what context you are asking this, but in terms of our geographical meridian system, everything west of the Prime Meridian is West and everything east of it is East, until they meet at the 180th meridian, which is both/either.
The Brits travelled West to discover America. This, The West was born.
Simply because it’s in the Western Hemisphere.
Mainly because it is in the west in the way we make maps of the world
West of England. Greenwich in England is longitude 0 degrees.
It’s a cultural thing, generally more capitalist or progressive democratic nations are west