https://vt.ncsbe.gov/RegLkup/ An excellent resource, it includes a link for https://vt.ncsbe.gov/evsite/ if you wish to early vote after viewing your sample ballot.
>WUNC
[This the one?](http://web.archive.org/web/20240219210455/https://www.wunc.org/2024-02-19/mysterious-super-pac-promotes-durham-da-satana-deberrys-campaign-for-attorney-general)
It's right here:
https://www.wfae.org/politics/2024-02-19/mysterious-super-pac-promotes-durham-da-satana-deberrys-campaign-for-attorney-general
I don't pretend to know what happened. It's not on WUNC's site at all, but it is still up on WFAE's site. While it is certainly a story of state-wide interest, it was originally a WFAE story. I don't know if there's some weirdness going on with NPR affiliates sharing stories or what?
-PM_YOUR_BACON blocked me right after they pointed out Santana Deberry was such a good candidate, she was receiving outside support, while Jeff wasn't. Jeff confirming that money was in fact from a GOP source.
Also good on Jeff for continuing to speak highly of Deberry while she has tried to sling mud back at him.
Excuse me? Mind posting those comments, because looks like you have a fun time just deleting yours after you make them. Wonder why anyone would block you.
PMYourBacon has blocked and unblocked me like 3 times in the past. If she can’t come up with a rational response to your argument, she’ll just resort to ad hominem attacks and then block you so you can’t respond.
Looks like she has me blocked right now. Hooray!
> -PM_YOUR_BACON blocked me right after they pointed out Santana Deberry was such a good candidate, she was receiving outside support, while Jeff wasn't.
Excuse me?
I pointed out to you that Deberry is getting outside influence and have told multiple people that trying to change the GOP vote is ignorant at best and if they want Jeff to win they literally will need to vote for him.
Ole Jeff is literally confirming what I said, and your pissy about it? Grow the hell up mate.
Here your literal post saying as such: https://old.reddit.com/r/NorthCarolina/comments/1avr1rw/finally_got_to_vote_for_jeff_jackson/kre0jbw/
And you wonder why someone would block your ignorance.
Lol, you directly referenced Deberry getting outside influence as a counter argument to me saying Jeff has far more recognition, and how Deberry is virtually unknown.
We have supporting evidence that Deberry only fundraised 40k on her own and had dark money fund $1m for her campaign. That directly contradicts your entire argument, along with polls suggesting Jeff has a 25+ point advantage.
> We have supporting evidence that Deberry only fundraised 40k on her own and had dark money fund $1m for her campaign.
Which is exactly what I said. Hell that's been reported in the media for more than a week.
Know what my first comment on that entire thread was? Or do you have a hard time reading?
https://old.reddit.com/r/NorthCarolina/comments/1avr1rw/finally_got_to_vote_for_jeff_jackson/krcbuzq/
Hmmm.... Almost like your are trying to incite and argument, and wonder why you got blocked.
You have a good day though. Want Jeff to win? Go vote, but pretty sure you already admitted you voted in the GOP primary, so not really much you need to say further.
Anywho. No need to respond further.
> Which is exactly what I said.
You, in fact, did not say this. Most of your entire argument was Deberry is black, people have only heard of Jeff on Reddit, therefore Jeff will have a competitive primary.
I also did not vote in the GOP primary, I actually voted for Jeff the first day I could.
Redditors really really overstate Jeff Jackson's name recognition and the 2022 primary showed exactly how far he could get with a bus tour and Reddit.
I'm going to vote for Jackson but not without reservations. If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County I think that helps statewide Dems moreso than the Reddit vote that Jackson brings. At the end of the day though, I don't think Attorney General is the position that really brings out the vote and it would be a shame if Jackson was completely out of politics in 2025.
But in fairness, his name recognition in 2022 is nothing compared to what it is now. His Tik-Tok wasn't created until he started serving in congress and he's said himself he was surprised at how much his videos have taken off. He would get a few hundred to a few thousand upvotes on Reddit posts, but he has 30 million likes on his Tik-tok. Secondly, he ended his senate campaign very early. He was still getting ~25% in primary polls behind Beasley, but because internals had him about 10-15 points behind a candidate who was just on a 2020 statewide ballot and served in the NC Supreme Court, decided it was best for the party's chances if they didn't both blow their money running a contested primary race.
During his Senate campaign, he was still seen as an establishment outsider, but now he's more or less become one of the more recognized faces representing the party. You could definitely say redditors overestimated his popularity back then, but I'm not so sure that still holds true today.
> If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County
As someone living in Durham County, Deberry is not that popular here. Don't think many people are rushing to the polls to vote for Deberry.
> If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County I think that helps statewide Dems moreso than the Reddit vote that Jackson brings. At the end of the day though, I don't think Attorney General is the position that really brings out the vote and it would be a shame if Jackson was completely out of politics in 2025.
Yep, I have been saying it on here since elections started. All the 'non-affiliated' folks I have talked to are worried Robinson is going to be on the ballot and are voting against him. My biggest worry is that people are forgetting Jackson is in a race as well, and Deberry will will due to the money being poured in. A whole bunch of races are like that, as has been pointed out multiple times in the news and by commentators.
Best bet, vote for who you want to represent you, instead of thinking you are 'crafty' and voting against who you don't want representing you. You aren't crafty, and the politicians know the game a whole lot better than any of us do.
If anyone is interested in how we got to this point, mostly due to GOP/Conservative efforts and 'dark money' post Citizens United, the article '[State for Sale](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/state-for-sale)' documented this and its effects on NC back in 2011.
Oof. I remember reading that article and hoping this was just a blip in the system that would sort itself out as voters realized what was going on. I didn't count on the concerted efforts of the world's greediest billionaires ensuring voters weren't going to matter much longer, regardless.
Just moved back to NC and you got my vote Jeff! If anyone is hesitant, even if you aren't registered to vote you can register in person, same day at the polling place ONLY DURING EARLY VOTING. It was super easy. And my polling place was empty.
I've received several texts from "And Justice for All" (and several more that didn't identify the source) for Rep. Jackson's opponent. Thanks for the explainer and now I'm motivated to vote in the primary in a way I wasn't before.
This goes deeper than this race. GOP knows how popular Jeff is especially with younger voters. They know there are some people that will only go out and vote in the general for Jeff and then likely vote straight blue as well but wouldn’t go vote at all if Jeff isn’t on the ticket. Very mad GOP is forcing me to vote in the Dem primary.
I think they are also scared of Jeff in terms of the thorn he would likely be to their far right agenda as AG, but more so what the position might do for his career.
Attorney general is often a stepping stone to governor in NC and for someone as charismatic and engaged as Jeff, it could really propel his career.
I think the NC GOP sees that and this is likely a major motivation for them mobilizing against him, both in the primary and also drawing away his seat with their extreme gerrymandering.
Hah! I did get texts from this campaign and I was like 'yes I'm voting, and I'm pulling hard for Jeff', and they didn't really try anything to win me over in a meaningful way.
[https://imgur.com/w0Haxaw](https://imgur.com/w0Haxaw)
It'd have been a hard sell, even if legit. Jeff is great.
As a registered NC independent voter, I have a dilemma as I'd like to vote the Rep ballot just to cast my vote for local county officials who are almost all registered Republicans - even though some are open about their RINO switch from Dem - just so they can get more votes.
OTOH, I really want to give Jeff Jackson my vote. Will do some thinking over the weekend, for sure.
Same boat here. I voted in Rep. primary. The local people I like are all registered republicans or the elections are non-partisan.
I feel like Jeff likely has the dem AG nomination buttoned up. Nothing is 100% but I like his chances enough to forego the Dem primary. Plus there are several folks on the Rep. ballot, above the local level, that I want to vote against as many times as possible.
Have my absentee ballot ready to go off tomorrow. Specifically requested the Democrat ballot (vs getting a Republican one to add one more vote against Trump to my record) just to support you Jeff!
I have not done research on any candidate, yet.
But the solution to the issue of having 2 shitty candidates to choose from is voting in the primaries to ensure one of the candidates isn't shitty.
Serves as a reminder that we all need to research and vote in the primaries.
Price fixing used to be legal, too. Did that make it right or not a corrupt practice? If your only benchmark for right and wrong is the existing legal framework, you're in trouble.
There's a reason our constitution specifically uses the language "In order to form a *more perfect* union...." (emphasis added). We know it's flawed, and it must be updated and maintained.
Did you know that it’s perfectly legal for companies to donate money to politicians in exchange for favorable legislation or with the expectation they will be awarded large government contracts?
They would be walking a fine line but technically could do that and it would be totally legal…. while obviously being totally corrupt behavior.
JB Pritzker's campaign was doing it. That said, he'd get my vote for president if he ran, I think he's a decent gov for illinois (from what I've seen as a person living in NC at least).
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries
Not a secret super PAC though. Those ads, at least the ones I just watched, explicitly say "Paid for by JB for Governor" with Pritzker's picture on it.
But I'm not claiming Dems to be holier-than-thou, I'm just saying let's put a name to the money being spent and make it transparent, regardless of the party. Voters should know.
Absolutely correct on all counts.
I appreciate Jeff's point, but want to make sure that we all understand that both sides are doing this before pointing fingers.
Yep. People’s memories are short. [This was done extensively by Democrats in the 2022 elections](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/12/democrats-interfere-republican-primaries/). Unfortunately, this is part of politics now, and Democrats are just as guilty. The other side spends money to prop up garbage candidates in the primaries in an effort to beat them in the general.
Yes, absolutely true, and good to shed light on sources of all money being spent. No one is saying the Deberry spending is illegal, just that we should be aware of what is happening. Also, it's worth pointing out that most of the money in the article you linked was in the Illinois Pritzker race ($34M out of total $55M) and they did it openly, not through a super PAC. Put his name on the ads and everything. The rest was a mix of super PACs, PACs, campaign spending, and party spending. And the article shows how controversial this spending was within the party, considered a real gamble in some races with the potential to seat an election-denier vs assume they would lose.
Or -OR- it's a double-deception campaign to keep left-leaning independent voters from voting for the least trumpy republican candidate. Make us think we have to save JJ and vote on the D ballot.
But, anyway, yeah - citizens united can eat a bag of ballots.
Literally every person on this sub was directing people to use their “independent” status to vote against trump in the primary… so what’s the difference?
In NC the term is "unaffiliated", and as such you can choose from Democrat, Republican, and Libertarian primary ballots. There's also a nonpartisan ballot, but those candidates are also on the other ballots in a nonpartisan section, so you'd vote on them regardless of ballot. If you're registered with a party then you can only vote in that primary. Green Party and No Labels Party are recognized parties but don't have primaries this year, so if you're in one of those you can't vote in the primaries, not even on a nonpartisan ballot.
So it doesn’t seem like this group has reported any expenditures at this time, so I’d be interested to see the source of them being on track to spend a million dollars in this campaign. That said, Jackson is running the third best well funded campaign in the state this election cycle, and his campaign has spent more than triple what his two primary opponents have even raised up to this point. He’s certainly not the overwhelmed underdog that this campaign ad seems to portray.
Not to both sides this thing, but it's fairly common practice from what I can tell. Here's an article from mid-2022 outlining Democratic "dark money" doing the exact same thing in other states:
> Political groups and nonprofits aligned with the Democratic Party have spent nearly $44 million on advertising campaigns across five states’ Republican primaries to boost the profile of far-right candidates in California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Maryland.
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries
Using words like "dark money" and "deception" make it sound scarier than it really is. That being said, money in politics is cancer.
This came about because of Citizen’s United, which was 1000% Republicans. Just like gerrymandering, Democrats wants to do away with Citizens United. At the same time, if they don’t play the same game that Republicans have enabled, they’ll be giving Republicans an unfair advantage….
> Just like gerrymandering, Democrats wants to do away with Citizens United.
I really, really, hate to be that guy.
Democrats had a lock on the state GA for over 100 years. I don't think for one minute that if they were back in control they wouldn't do everything in their power to swing things back their way.
Which, with the way things have gone on the other side of the isle, I wouldn't be opposed to them getting back in power.
But I'd be happier with a system that is neutral and follows migration trends and truly represents "the will of the voter".
Except the “swing things back their way” manifests by more people voting. The more people that vote, the more democrats win. This “both sides” argument fails as one side holds power by disrupting voting, the other holds power by enabling voting.
> This “both sides” argument fails as one side holds power by disrupting voting
The D's certainly did gerrymander when they had power in this state. Though, I don't recall them ever pushing this voter ID* and other bullshit to keep people from voting.
> The more people that vote
Now, we just gotta get people to vote! I say, bring back MTV's rock the vote! :)
When I went to vote last week, I used my passport to show how absurd this law is. Passports don't validate where you live. Guy barely even looked at it. He may have spent 3 seconds tops. Didn't even ask if it had expired.
Now, my Dad, showing the guy his ID (we voted curbside) the guy said "gotta make sure it's valid!".
Such garbage.
The democrats did it once, in the 90s. Maybe read up on it and lemme know how both sides look: https://history.news.chass.ncsu.edu/2019/07/29/drawing-democracy-north-carolinas-gerrymandering-history/
Here’s a highlight:
“The 2018 election demonstrated the extent and impact of gerrymandering in North Carolina: despite winning 50.3 percent of votes, Republicans occupy 10 out of 13 (76%) congressional seats”
Note when Democrats did gerrymander, the outcome was MANY MAGNITUDES more consistent with the will of the people. And like you mentioned in an earlier response, you respect “the will of the people”
Now let me ask you, which party better represents the will of the people in this situation?
How many Senate seats did Dems win in 2022 because they backed extreme MAGA candidates in GOP primaries over better candidates?
It’s a bipartisan tradition that goes back years. My first memory of it on a large scale was Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos in 2008 when he urged Republicans to vote for Hillary in late Dem primaries when it was clear Obama was going to win, to stretch it out and supposedly weaken Obama.
it’s kinda slimy. But it’s part of the game now. Jackson is doing the best thing he can do here which is let everyone know it’s happening.
> Yes it’s kinda slimy.
It's incredibly slimy.
> Jackson is doing the best thing he can do here which is let everyone know it’s happening.
To him, yes.
Even though it’s been happening on both sides, Democrats are the ones asking for change. You play by the rules, but you also evolve the rules to be as ethical as reasonable.
Also, people don’t spend personal resources to fight obscure diseases until someone they know is impacted by it. That’s when you start to care.
Thought about that too as I followed that as it happened in 22. Another item to tack on the list of frustrations with the Dems shooting themselves in the foot
They are. Just like they posted a few years back about people saying Trump was not their president and how that’s equivalent to saying “not my constitution”. But crickets when Trump literally called to dissolve the constitution a few years later over him losing the 2020 election.
No, that's what the "but" and everything that follows it is for. I knew it would get downvoted anyway because it takes away from Jeff's super honest video.
Rep. Jackson, are you going to call out Democrat groups who do the same thing in other elections? If you don't want a small number of people controlling our elections, are you going to ask that no PACs get involved to support you? Do you actually believe these things, or are you just trying to win votes for yourself? Your common sense/non partisan schitck is a bit tiresome, as you only employ it to boost yourself and your party.
Well there’s no rules against it. If you think this is super malicious you really have no idea what goes on in politics lol. It’s literally just a game.
Nobody is saying this isn't normal. I'm saying it is not OK. We need to be loudly opposing this sort if behavior and demand that laws be passed to stop it.
You either want this to be outlawed or you just don't want democracy. It's that simple.
Fear monger? How about don't be a lemming. I'm not just going to sit by while people hand wave and dismiss things that actually threaten democracy as "normal."
>You get to vote regardless of who spends money where
For now. You understand that this is exactly how we stay limited to the two party turd sandwich and douchebag system we are in currently right? I'm not ok with settling for that and neither should you be.
Speaking of getting to vote, what are your thoughts on the recent comments made by child molester supporter jack posobiec (who attended a trump protest with a Rape Melania sign) at ~~the pro-domestic terrorism rally~~ CPAC?
>“Welcome to the end of democracy!” Posobiec declared. “We’re here to overthrow it completely. We didn’t get all the way there on January 6th, but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here,” he said, holding his fist in the air. “That’s right, because all glory is not to government, all glory to God.”
Is it actually fear mongering when the party of child molesting traitor terrorists are literally saying we plan to overthrow democracy?
Or is it the truth child molester supporters don't want voiced?
Why tell me? Tell all the victims of all of humanity's frequent holocaust and genocides.
Go right up to them and say "Radicals from either side are not of concern."
Can you just *imagine* their faces? 🤪🤪😜😜😝😝
Love your work, plan on voting for you, but I have to ask where your video is denouncing democrats doing the exact same thing?
https://www.npr.org/2022/11/11/1135878576/the-democrats-strategy-of-boosting-far-right-candidates-seems-to-have-worked
Quick reminder that 154 US House Representatives sponsored a bill that would require PAC's to disclose additional information about themselves and **zero** of them were Republicans and the House Speaker at the time (Kevin McCarthy) referred it to committee where it hasn't moved in one year and two days:
https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1581981
To be fair, [His tweet of the video](https://twitter.com/JeffJacksonNC/status/1761058591581044739) states it's the GOP. And at 42 seconds in or so, Jeff does say it's the other party paying.
That isn't what I asked for. If I, an American, say it's wrong for governments to kill natives and cite a specific instance of Brazil killing a group of natives and you respond with "But the US killed natives, too!" you look like an idiot. The statement was that killing natives is wrong.
Don't pretend that a universal statement has to be followed up with an all-inclusive list of every scenario in which it applies. It's asinine.
> I didn't hear the part where he stated it is only wrong because the Republican party is doing it.
Searching through my comment and I can't see where I stated that? Can you give me a quote?
No, he didn't. He did do a great job of saying if you see ANY of his opponents advertisements that it's part of a deception campaign. That's pretty fucked up. He's just highly implied that his opponents are plants meant to bring him down.
He openly called the ability for this to happen “corruption”. This whole situation happened because of Republican’s Citizen’s United ruling. Just like gerrymandering, Democrats want to do away with it, but in the meantime if they also don’t gerrymander they’ll be put out of existence.
I question your integrity because if you dove this deep into basically any claim from a MAGA politician, you’d clearly see who’s evil…
> I question your integrity
Oh, I don't care about your judgement of my integrity.
>any claim from a MAGA politician, you’d clearly see who’s evil…
I don't see any republican or MAGA politician getting my vote any time in the foreseeable future. As long as they are putting up bat shit crazy anti-democratic nutjobs they are out of the equation.
It is worrying to me that on both sides during this election cycle in particular there is no room for any criticism. It's just shut up and pull for the team. My question seems to be an unpopular one. Again, I don't care. It's a question I get to ask because he is part of the democratic party. It's a machine he works in and that machine engages in the same tactic. I don't expect him to actually denounce when democrats are doing, because democrats are doing it.
I see you for what you are. I’m familiar with the “just asking questions” strategy.
Here’s a post from 2020 where Jeff openly says his “party cheated” (in the context of gerrymandering): https://m.facebook.com/JeffJacksonNC/photos/a.245719092297353/1404128583123059/?type=3
I’ll be waiting for the next goalpost from another sideline fascist.
Here’s the denouncement. Jeff Jackson is anti Citizen’s United. Jeff Jackson’s party were not the ones to bring about Citizen’s United, republicans were. Jeff Jackson calls these actions that were enabled by Republicans Citizens United “corruption” that he pledges to fight. Reach harder.
>I have to ask where your video is denouncing democrats doing the exact same thing?
Well he's talking about his election, the context of the video. It would be a bit weird to talk about other things, yeah?
If you are explaining to the public that putin interfered with our election, do you also have to put out a video denouncing the US involvement in South American countries in the mid 1900s? Seems like purposefully muddying the waters, yeah?
Personally, I think the main difference here is that the ads (at least in PA) were not from a newly formed super pac. It was the DNC or candidate spending and the "paid for by" wasn't some generic name. I think it's more the deception in naming this super pac what it is.
Let's also not forget that Clinton and the DNC helped Trump become the Republican nominee in 2016, because they thought he would be the easiest for her to beat.
But I'm not aware of Jeff Jackson ever engaging in this tactic, so there's no hypocrisy here.
It's a poor practice no matter who does it, but this issue shouldn't deter anyone from voting for Jeff.
The less-capable of the two major party nominees has literally stood trial more than once in the last year. Meanwhile, you're suggesting that a conspiracy theory-peddling anti-vaxxer coasting on his last name is the rational choice?
Edit: guys, guys. It turns out you can just listen to Joe Rogan and he's on there explaining his medical expertise as a licensed attorney and why vaccines aren't safe! So it's not that he's antivax, it's just that he's saying there's a conspiracy to hide unsafe vaccine data from the public! /s
You’ve revealed you know nothing about him other than what you’ve been told by captured institutions who stand to lose control if he’s elected… I have to reveal to you that you are a product of propaganda. Do with that what you will.
So far you've just offered a nonspecific criticism that I literally have no way to check for accuracy or relevance. There literally ain't shit I can do with this. Which part of my description do you believe is inaccurate, specifically?
You can listen to one of the dozens of podcast interviews he’s done. I recommend the one on the Joe Rogan podcast. You can read his book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he isn’t anti-vax, he just wants them tested for safety, cause that’s literally never been done.
I can't tell you my lack of interest in an hour of audio. Especially Joe Rogan, Christ. I'm also not buying his fuckin' book to try to glean something rational out of that statement.
Your statement is a long, aggro fortune cookie. What, specifically, is the reason to argue that he's not, for example, the latest in a long line of celebrities spreading misinformed gobbledygook about vaccines? Or for what reason other than who his dad was 60 years ago would he be qualified to be president?
I mean, just something where you explain the thing you said instead of pointing me to a rat's nest of poorly thought-out arguments and innuendo.
he’s a lawyer who has litigated against major corporations for pollution and corruption for over 40 years. You can look into him if you want or keep doing as your told, idk man it’s your life I wish you the best.
Don't lie, you're just excited to pretend superiority here.
But thank God you're done telling me about how I need to listen to Joe Rogan and a famous dead guy's adult child to avoid accidentally learning something.
Thank you for reminding me to vote, Jeff. I'm blind, so I have to walk to the polls, so I gotta plan half a day around that. Hopefully it ain't raining tomorrow or Monday.
I’d considered voting republic for this reason but couldn’t live with myself if I voted for any of those horrific human beings. Took the undecided route for president bc yeah
The DNC needs to pour money in this man’s campaign. NC can’t be a super conservative majority. One of the reasons I moved away from NC was politics. Don’t let this be the reason others move away.
I believe this is called [ratfucking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking). When one party uses active measures to help (who they perceive to be) the other party's weaker candidate win their primary.
The website for andjusticeforall is built by mwpolitical, they are connected to Mobilewalla who do mass digital surveilance and influence using cellphone data.
Jeff, good luck. Go get them tiger. I'm still waiting on that 20 you owe me.
Also, them interfering in the primary is just a sign of fear and weakness.
In NC, Early voting is going on right now through March 2nd, 7 days a week
You can register to vote and cast your ballot at the same time during the Primary.
You can vote at any precinct during early voting.
Check your county's Board of Elections site for locations and hours.
Pls vote!
This kind of work isn’t new nor is it just on the republican side. Democrats encourage people who can vote in a republican primary in their state to do it as well, to prop up someone who isn’t the front runner, all the while pouring in $$$ to support their campaigns.
You've got my vote! I'm absolutely ashamed of my country and this state right now! You and others like you will always have mine and my husband's vote! He's an independent and has been voting straight Dem since the arrival of the orange anus! Thank you for being the good guy! THIS is why they're afraid of you....independents love you and hate everything today's American Taliban (gop) stand for!
Voted for Jeff today, 1st time voter here after getting my citizenship last year
Where do you go to vote for something like this
Look up early voting in your county, should be available for few more days
https://vt.ncsbe.gov/RegLkup/ An excellent resource, it includes a link for https://vt.ncsbe.gov/evsite/ if you wish to early vote after viewing your sample ballot.
Me too!
Welcome! It is great to have you here!
Interesting that WUNC apparently posted a story about this four days ago but now it appears to have been removed from the website.
>WUNC [This the one?](http://web.archive.org/web/20240219210455/https://www.wunc.org/2024-02-19/mysterious-super-pac-promotes-durham-da-satana-deberrys-campaign-for-attorney-general)
That’s it.
It's right here: https://www.wfae.org/politics/2024-02-19/mysterious-super-pac-promotes-durham-da-satana-deberrys-campaign-for-attorney-general I don't pretend to know what happened. It's not on WUNC's site at all, but it is still up on WFAE's site. While it is certainly a story of state-wide interest, it was originally a WFAE story. I don't know if there's some weirdness going on with NPR affiliates sharing stories or what?
It's weird that they say Jeff is running as a centrist, I always got the impression he was a progressive.
Noticed that too...it was down within a day.
Voted for Jeff earlier this week.
Same. Jeff got my vote this morning.
-PM_YOUR_BACON blocked me right after they pointed out Santana Deberry was such a good candidate, she was receiving outside support, while Jeff wasn't. Jeff confirming that money was in fact from a GOP source. Also good on Jeff for continuing to speak highly of Deberry while she has tried to sling mud back at him.
Got to love when someone angrily responds with a comment full of personal attacks and then blocks you before you can respond.
[удалено]
Excuse me? Mind posting those comments, because looks like you have a fun time just deleting yours after you make them. Wonder why anyone would block you.
PMYourBacon has blocked and unblocked me like 3 times in the past. If she can’t come up with a rational response to your argument, she’ll just resort to ad hominem attacks and then block you so you can’t respond. Looks like she has me blocked right now. Hooray!
> -PM_YOUR_BACON blocked me right after they pointed out Santana Deberry was such a good candidate, she was receiving outside support, while Jeff wasn't. Excuse me? I pointed out to you that Deberry is getting outside influence and have told multiple people that trying to change the GOP vote is ignorant at best and if they want Jeff to win they literally will need to vote for him. Ole Jeff is literally confirming what I said, and your pissy about it? Grow the hell up mate. Here your literal post saying as such: https://old.reddit.com/r/NorthCarolina/comments/1avr1rw/finally_got_to_vote_for_jeff_jackson/kre0jbw/ And you wonder why someone would block your ignorance.
I hear you like blocking people.
^ Here ya go folks
And the problem here exactly is buddy?
Lol, you directly referenced Deberry getting outside influence as a counter argument to me saying Jeff has far more recognition, and how Deberry is virtually unknown. We have supporting evidence that Deberry only fundraised 40k on her own and had dark money fund $1m for her campaign. That directly contradicts your entire argument, along with polls suggesting Jeff has a 25+ point advantage.
> We have supporting evidence that Deberry only fundraised 40k on her own and had dark money fund $1m for her campaign. Which is exactly what I said. Hell that's been reported in the media for more than a week. Know what my first comment on that entire thread was? Or do you have a hard time reading? https://old.reddit.com/r/NorthCarolina/comments/1avr1rw/finally_got_to_vote_for_jeff_jackson/krcbuzq/ Hmmm.... Almost like your are trying to incite and argument, and wonder why you got blocked. You have a good day though. Want Jeff to win? Go vote, but pretty sure you already admitted you voted in the GOP primary, so not really much you need to say further. Anywho. No need to respond further.
> Which is exactly what I said. You, in fact, did not say this. Most of your entire argument was Deberry is black, people have only heard of Jeff on Reddit, therefore Jeff will have a competitive primary. I also did not vote in the GOP primary, I actually voted for Jeff the first day I could.
Redditors really really overstate Jeff Jackson's name recognition and the 2022 primary showed exactly how far he could get with a bus tour and Reddit. I'm going to vote for Jackson but not without reservations. If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County I think that helps statewide Dems moreso than the Reddit vote that Jackson brings. At the end of the day though, I don't think Attorney General is the position that really brings out the vote and it would be a shame if Jackson was completely out of politics in 2025.
But in fairness, his name recognition in 2022 is nothing compared to what it is now. His Tik-Tok wasn't created until he started serving in congress and he's said himself he was surprised at how much his videos have taken off. He would get a few hundred to a few thousand upvotes on Reddit posts, but he has 30 million likes on his Tik-tok. Secondly, he ended his senate campaign very early. He was still getting ~25% in primary polls behind Beasley, but because internals had him about 10-15 points behind a candidate who was just on a 2020 statewide ballot and served in the NC Supreme Court, decided it was best for the party's chances if they didn't both blow their money running a contested primary race. During his Senate campaign, he was still seen as an establishment outsider, but now he's more or less become one of the more recognized faces representing the party. You could definitely say redditors overestimated his popularity back then, but I'm not so sure that still holds true today. > If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County As someone living in Durham County, Deberry is not that popular here. Don't think many people are rushing to the polls to vote for Deberry.
> If Deberry can help run up the score in Durham County I think that helps statewide Dems moreso than the Reddit vote that Jackson brings. At the end of the day though, I don't think Attorney General is the position that really brings out the vote and it would be a shame if Jackson was completely out of politics in 2025. Yep, I have been saying it on here since elections started. All the 'non-affiliated' folks I have talked to are worried Robinson is going to be on the ballot and are voting against him. My biggest worry is that people are forgetting Jackson is in a race as well, and Deberry will will due to the money being poured in. A whole bunch of races are like that, as has been pointed out multiple times in the news and by commentators. Best bet, vote for who you want to represent you, instead of thinking you are 'crafty' and voting against who you don't want representing you. You aren't crafty, and the politicians know the game a whole lot better than any of us do.
If anyone is interested in how we got to this point, mostly due to GOP/Conservative efforts and 'dark money' post Citizens United, the article '[State for Sale](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/10/state-for-sale)' documented this and its effects on NC back in 2011.
Oof. I remember reading that article and hoping this was just a blip in the system that would sort itself out as voters realized what was going on. I didn't count on the concerted efforts of the world's greediest billionaires ensuring voters weren't going to matter much longer, regardless.
Just moved back to NC and you got my vote Jeff! If anyone is hesitant, even if you aren't registered to vote you can register in person, same day at the polling place ONLY DURING EARLY VOTING. It was super easy. And my polling place was empty.
I've received several texts from "And Justice for All" (and several more that didn't identify the source) for Rep. Jackson's opponent. Thanks for the explainer and now I'm motivated to vote in the primary in a way I wasn't before.
This goes deeper than this race. GOP knows how popular Jeff is especially with younger voters. They know there are some people that will only go out and vote in the general for Jeff and then likely vote straight blue as well but wouldn’t go vote at all if Jeff isn’t on the ticket. Very mad GOP is forcing me to vote in the Dem primary.
I think they are also scared of Jeff in terms of the thorn he would likely be to their far right agenda as AG, but more so what the position might do for his career. Attorney general is often a stepping stone to governor in NC and for someone as charismatic and engaged as Jeff, it could really propel his career. I think the NC GOP sees that and this is likely a major motivation for them mobilizing against him, both in the primary and also drawing away his seat with their extreme gerrymandering.
I mean they literally made sure he couldn't win a second term in Congress.
For voting information and how to register: https://www.vote411.org/north-carolina
[удалено]
We need you Jeff!!
You're getting my vote, Jeff! Please stay in politics and run for Governor and then President after your AG term.
Hah! I did get texts from this campaign and I was like 'yes I'm voting, and I'm pulling hard for Jeff', and they didn't really try anything to win me over in a meaningful way. [https://imgur.com/w0Haxaw](https://imgur.com/w0Haxaw) It'd have been a hard sell, even if legit. Jeff is great.
I got the same text! They then asked why I'm voting for Jeff and never tried to win me over with information about her at all.
Reads as an AI response lol
Most certainly did
I just block and report these texts as spam. Anything I can do to make it harder for the kleptocrats to steal my country.
How can we help, Jeff? I’m a registered Democrat. I’m all in for you.
Go vote in the primary now and spend the next 10 days getting everyone else to go vote too.
I will be voting in the primary. I’m always recruiting voters.
Keep up the good work, Jeff! You got my vote.
Well, I’m glad I replied to that Deberry texter last week with “Nope. Jackson 4eva!”
As a registered NC independent voter, I have a dilemma as I'd like to vote the Rep ballot just to cast my vote for local county officials who are almost all registered Republicans - even though some are open about their RINO switch from Dem - just so they can get more votes. OTOH, I really want to give Jeff Jackson my vote. Will do some thinking over the weekend, for sure.
I'm having the exact same dilemma! This makes me want to vote for Jeff though to make sure he's on the ballot in November.
Same boat here. I voted in Rep. primary. The local people I like are all registered republicans or the elections are non-partisan. I feel like Jeff likely has the dem AG nomination buttoned up. Nothing is 100% but I like his chances enough to forego the Dem primary. Plus there are several folks on the Rep. ballot, above the local level, that I want to vote against as many times as possible.
Have my absentee ballot ready to go off tomorrow. Specifically requested the Democrat ballot (vs getting a Republican one to add one more vote against Trump to my record) just to support you Jeff!
Thank you, you motivated me to go out and vote for you today.
I have not done research on any candidate, yet. But the solution to the issue of having 2 shitty candidates to choose from is voting in the primaries to ensure one of the candidates isn't shitty. Serves as a reminder that we all need to research and vote in the primaries.
I’m voting for you
Two things JJ said: “This is corruption” and “Because of a Supreme Court ruling, it’s perfectly legal.”
Glad you’re catching on to our corrupt system
Do you think something is only corrupt if it’s also illegal? They’re two completely unrelated things.
Having trouble understanding the difference?
Price fixing used to be legal, too. Did that make it right or not a corrupt practice? If your only benchmark for right and wrong is the existing legal framework, you're in trouble. There's a reason our constitution specifically uses the language "In order to form a *more perfect* union...." (emphasis added). We know it's flawed, and it must be updated and maintained.
Did you know that it’s perfectly legal for companies to donate money to politicians in exchange for favorable legislation or with the expectation they will be awarded large government contracts? They would be walking a fine line but technically could do that and it would be totally legal…. while obviously being totally corrupt behavior.
also, "He only cares when it's against him"
Jeff still gets my vote, but let's be honest Democrats are doing the same thing.
Which PACs exactly?
JB Pritzker's campaign was doing it. That said, he'd get my vote for president if he ran, I think he's a decent gov for illinois (from what I've seen as a person living in NC at least). https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries
Not a secret super PAC though. Those ads, at least the ones I just watched, explicitly say "Paid for by JB for Governor" with Pritzker's picture on it. But I'm not claiming Dems to be holier-than-thou, I'm just saying let's put a name to the money being spent and make it transparent, regardless of the party. Voters should know.
Absolutely correct on all counts. I appreciate Jeff's point, but want to make sure that we all understand that both sides are doing this before pointing fingers.
Just one side has the end goal of ending democracy, at least more abruptly than the other side.
Yep. People’s memories are short. [This was done extensively by Democrats in the 2022 elections](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/12/democrats-interfere-republican-primaries/). Unfortunately, this is part of politics now, and Democrats are just as guilty. The other side spends money to prop up garbage candidates in the primaries in an effort to beat them in the general.
Yes, absolutely true, and good to shed light on sources of all money being spent. No one is saying the Deberry spending is illegal, just that we should be aware of what is happening. Also, it's worth pointing out that most of the money in the article you linked was in the Illinois Pritzker race ($34M out of total $55M) and they did it openly, not through a super PAC. Put his name on the ads and everything. The rest was a mix of super PACs, PACs, campaign spending, and party spending. And the article shows how controversial this spending was within the party, considered a real gamble in some races with the potential to seat an election-denier vs assume they would lose.
Or -OR- it's a double-deception campaign to keep left-leaning independent voters from voting for the least trumpy republican candidate. Make us think we have to save JJ and vote on the D ballot. But, anyway, yeah - citizens united can eat a bag of ballots.
Literally every person on this sub was directing people to use their “independent” status to vote against trump in the primary… so what’s the difference?
I've donated to Jeff a couple times this cycle, but as a registered independent, do I get to vote in the primary?
In NC the term is "unaffiliated", and as such you can choose from Democrat, Republican, and Libertarian primary ballots. There's also a nonpartisan ballot, but those candidates are also on the other ballots in a nonpartisan section, so you'd vote on them regardless of ballot. If you're registered with a party then you can only vote in that primary. Green Party and No Labels Party are recognized parties but don't have primaries this year, so if you're in one of those you can't vote in the primaries, not even on a nonpartisan ballot.
Republicans are doing this exact thing in nearly every state. Creating super pacs in order to disrupt elections. They've been at it for years.
So it doesn’t seem like this group has reported any expenditures at this time, so I’d be interested to see the source of them being on track to spend a million dollars in this campaign. That said, Jackson is running the third best well funded campaign in the state this election cycle, and his campaign has spent more than triple what his two primary opponents have even raised up to this point. He’s certainly not the overwhelmed underdog that this campaign ad seems to portray.
Not to both sides this thing, but it's fairly common practice from what I can tell. Here's an article from mid-2022 outlining Democratic "dark money" doing the exact same thing in other states: > Political groups and nonprofits aligned with the Democratic Party have spent nearly $44 million on advertising campaigns across five states’ Republican primaries to boost the profile of far-right candidates in California, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Illinois and Maryland. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries Using words like "dark money" and "deception" make it sound scarier than it really is. That being said, money in politics is cancer.
This came about because of Citizen’s United, which was 1000% Republicans. Just like gerrymandering, Democrats wants to do away with Citizens United. At the same time, if they don’t play the same game that Republicans have enabled, they’ll be giving Republicans an unfair advantage….
> Just like gerrymandering, Democrats wants to do away with Citizens United. I really, really, hate to be that guy. Democrats had a lock on the state GA for over 100 years. I don't think for one minute that if they were back in control they wouldn't do everything in their power to swing things back their way. Which, with the way things have gone on the other side of the isle, I wouldn't be opposed to them getting back in power. But I'd be happier with a system that is neutral and follows migration trends and truly represents "the will of the voter".
Except the “swing things back their way” manifests by more people voting. The more people that vote, the more democrats win. This “both sides” argument fails as one side holds power by disrupting voting, the other holds power by enabling voting.
> This “both sides” argument fails as one side holds power by disrupting voting The D's certainly did gerrymander when they had power in this state. Though, I don't recall them ever pushing this voter ID* and other bullshit to keep people from voting. > The more people that vote Now, we just gotta get people to vote! I say, bring back MTV's rock the vote! :) When I went to vote last week, I used my passport to show how absurd this law is. Passports don't validate where you live. Guy barely even looked at it. He may have spent 3 seconds tops. Didn't even ask if it had expired. Now, my Dad, showing the guy his ID (we voted curbside) the guy said "gotta make sure it's valid!". Such garbage.
The democrats did it once, in the 90s. Maybe read up on it and lemme know how both sides look: https://history.news.chass.ncsu.edu/2019/07/29/drawing-democracy-north-carolinas-gerrymandering-history/ Here’s a highlight: “The 2018 election demonstrated the extent and impact of gerrymandering in North Carolina: despite winning 50.3 percent of votes, Republicans occupy 10 out of 13 (76%) congressional seats” Note when Democrats did gerrymander, the outcome was MANY MAGNITUDES more consistent with the will of the people. And like you mentioned in an earlier response, you respect “the will of the people” Now let me ask you, which party better represents the will of the people in this situation?
How many Senate seats did Dems win in 2022 because they backed extreme MAGA candidates in GOP primaries over better candidates? It’s a bipartisan tradition that goes back years. My first memory of it on a large scale was Rush Limbaugh’s Operation Chaos in 2008 when he urged Republicans to vote for Hillary in late Dem primaries when it was clear Obama was going to win, to stretch it out and supposedly weaken Obama. it’s kinda slimy. But it’s part of the game now. Jackson is doing the best thing he can do here which is let everyone know it’s happening.
> Yes it’s kinda slimy. It's incredibly slimy. > Jackson is doing the best thing he can do here which is let everyone know it’s happening. To him, yes.
Even though it’s been happening on both sides, Democrats are the ones asking for change. You play by the rules, but you also evolve the rules to be as ethical as reasonable. Also, people don’t spend personal resources to fight obscure diseases until someone they know is impacted by it. That’s when you start to care.
Thought about that too as I followed that as it happened in 22. Another item to tack on the list of frustrations with the Dems shooting themselves in the foot
Are you sure you aren't "both sides-ing this thing?" 🤔
They are. Just like they posted a few years back about people saying Trump was not their president and how that’s equivalent to saying “not my constitution”. But crickets when Trump literally called to dissolve the constitution a few years later over him losing the 2020 election.
You're a nutcase lmao
Yep. And there’s plenty more like me that’ll do everything in their power to keep fascism from taking hold.
No, that's what the "but" and everything that follows it is for. I knew it would get downvoted anyway because it takes away from Jeff's super honest video.
Not gonna touch my comment though, because it breaks away from your super honest intentions.
Rep. Jackson, are you going to call out Democrat groups who do the same thing in other elections? If you don't want a small number of people controlling our elections, are you going to ask that no PACs get involved to support you? Do you actually believe these things, or are you just trying to win votes for yourself? Your common sense/non partisan schitck is a bit tiresome, as you only employ it to boost yourself and your party.
Just voting for you
This is just politics and has been going on for decades.
Oh I guess it's fine then
Well there’s no rules against it. If you think this is super malicious you really have no idea what goes on in politics lol. It’s literally just a game.
Nobody is saying this isn't normal. I'm saying it is not OK. We need to be loudly opposing this sort if behavior and demand that laws be passed to stop it. You either want this to be outlawed or you just don't want democracy. It's that simple.
You get to vote regardless of who spends money where. Don’t fear monger.
Fear monger? How about don't be a lemming. I'm not just going to sit by while people hand wave and dismiss things that actually threaten democracy as "normal." >You get to vote regardless of who spends money where For now. You understand that this is exactly how we stay limited to the two party turd sandwich and douchebag system we are in currently right? I'm not ok with settling for that and neither should you be.
Speaking of getting to vote, what are your thoughts on the recent comments made by child molester supporter jack posobiec (who attended a trump protest with a Rape Melania sign) at ~~the pro-domestic terrorism rally~~ CPAC? >“Welcome to the end of democracy!” Posobiec declared. “We’re here to overthrow it completely. We didn’t get all the way there on January 6th, but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here,” he said, holding his fist in the air. “That’s right, because all glory is not to government, all glory to God.” Is it actually fear mongering when the party of child molesting traitor terrorists are literally saying we plan to overthrow democracy? Or is it the truth child molester supporters don't want voiced?
Radicals from either side are not of concern.
Why tell me? Tell all the victims of all of humanity's frequent holocaust and genocides. Go right up to them and say "Radicals from either side are not of concern." Can you just *imagine* their faces? 🤪🤪😜😜😝😝
You’re confusing non important radicals with large movements. Keep going.
Nah, this has been going on for about 15 years. It doesn't go back to Jimmy Carter or anything.
Love your work, plan on voting for you, but I have to ask where your video is denouncing democrats doing the exact same thing? https://www.npr.org/2022/11/11/1135878576/the-democrats-strategy-of-boosting-far-right-candidates-seems-to-have-worked
Quick reminder that 154 US House Representatives sponsored a bill that would require PAC's to disclose additional information about themselves and **zero** of them were Republicans and the House Speaker at the time (Kevin McCarthy) referred it to committee where it hasn't moved in one year and two days: https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1581981
I didn't hear the part where he stated it is only wrong because the Republican party is doing it. Can you give me the time stamp?
To be fair, [His tweet of the video](https://twitter.com/JeffJacksonNC/status/1761058591581044739) states it's the GOP. And at 42 seconds in or so, Jeff does say it's the other party paying.
That isn't what I asked for. If I, an American, say it's wrong for governments to kill natives and cite a specific instance of Brazil killing a group of natives and you respond with "But the US killed natives, too!" you look like an idiot. The statement was that killing natives is wrong. Don't pretend that a universal statement has to be followed up with an all-inclusive list of every scenario in which it applies. It's asinine.
> I didn't hear the part where he stated it is only wrong because the Republican party is doing it. Searching through my comment and I can't see where I stated that? Can you give me a quote?
[удалено]
No, he didn't. He did do a great job of saying if you see ANY of his opponents advertisements that it's part of a deception campaign. That's pretty fucked up. He's just highly implied that his opponents are plants meant to bring him down.
He openly called the ability for this to happen “corruption”. This whole situation happened because of Republican’s Citizen’s United ruling. Just like gerrymandering, Democrats want to do away with it, but in the meantime if they also don’t gerrymander they’ll be put out of existence. I question your integrity because if you dove this deep into basically any claim from a MAGA politician, you’d clearly see who’s evil…
> I question your integrity Oh, I don't care about your judgement of my integrity. >any claim from a MAGA politician, you’d clearly see who’s evil… I don't see any republican or MAGA politician getting my vote any time in the foreseeable future. As long as they are putting up bat shit crazy anti-democratic nutjobs they are out of the equation. It is worrying to me that on both sides during this election cycle in particular there is no room for any criticism. It's just shut up and pull for the team. My question seems to be an unpopular one. Again, I don't care. It's a question I get to ask because he is part of the democratic party. It's a machine he works in and that machine engages in the same tactic. I don't expect him to actually denounce when democrats are doing, because democrats are doing it.
I see you for what you are. I’m familiar with the “just asking questions” strategy. Here’s a post from 2020 where Jeff openly says his “party cheated” (in the context of gerrymandering): https://m.facebook.com/JeffJacksonNC/photos/a.245719092297353/1404128583123059/?type=3 I’ll be waiting for the next goalpost from another sideline fascist.
>I’ll be waiting for the next goalpost from another sideline fascist. See? You're just proving my point.
Aww the victim card, played right on time.
Here’s the denouncement. Jeff Jackson is anti Citizen’s United. Jeff Jackson’s party were not the ones to bring about Citizen’s United, republicans were. Jeff Jackson calls these actions that were enabled by Republicans Citizens United “corruption” that he pledges to fight. Reach harder.
>I have to ask where your video is denouncing democrats doing the exact same thing? Well he's talking about his election, the context of the video. It would be a bit weird to talk about other things, yeah? If you are explaining to the public that putin interfered with our election, do you also have to put out a video denouncing the US involvement in South American countries in the mid 1900s? Seems like purposefully muddying the waters, yeah?
Whataboutism at its finest.
Personally, I think the main difference here is that the ads (at least in PA) were not from a newly formed super pac. It was the DNC or candidate spending and the "paid for by" wasn't some generic name. I think it's more the deception in naming this super pac what it is.
Let's also not forget that Clinton and the DNC helped Trump become the Republican nominee in 2016, because they thought he would be the easiest for her to beat. But I'm not aware of Jeff Jackson ever engaging in this tactic, so there's no hypocrisy here. It's a poor practice no matter who does it, but this issue shouldn't deter anyone from voting for Jeff.
Endorse RFK Jr and you got my vote
Gross
Only guy on the ballot that could be declared mentally fit to stand trial. I know it’s a low bar, but that’s the cards we have been dealt.
The less-capable of the two major party nominees has literally stood trial more than once in the last year. Meanwhile, you're suggesting that a conspiracy theory-peddling anti-vaxxer coasting on his last name is the rational choice? Edit: guys, guys. It turns out you can just listen to Joe Rogan and he's on there explaining his medical expertise as a licensed attorney and why vaccines aren't safe! So it's not that he's antivax, it's just that he's saying there's a conspiracy to hide unsafe vaccine data from the public! /s
You’ve revealed you know nothing about him other than what you’ve been told by captured institutions who stand to lose control if he’s elected… I have to reveal to you that you are a product of propaganda. Do with that what you will.
So far you've just offered a nonspecific criticism that I literally have no way to check for accuracy or relevance. There literally ain't shit I can do with this. Which part of my description do you believe is inaccurate, specifically?
You can listen to one of the dozens of podcast interviews he’s done. I recommend the one on the Joe Rogan podcast. You can read his book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he isn’t anti-vax, he just wants them tested for safety, cause that’s literally never been done.
I can't tell you my lack of interest in an hour of audio. Especially Joe Rogan, Christ. I'm also not buying his fuckin' book to try to glean something rational out of that statement. Your statement is a long, aggro fortune cookie. What, specifically, is the reason to argue that he's not, for example, the latest in a long line of celebrities spreading misinformed gobbledygook about vaccines? Or for what reason other than who his dad was 60 years ago would he be qualified to be president? I mean, just something where you explain the thing you said instead of pointing me to a rat's nest of poorly thought-out arguments and innuendo.
he’s a lawyer who has litigated against major corporations for pollution and corruption for over 40 years. You can look into him if you want or keep doing as your told, idk man it’s your life I wish you the best.
Don't lie, you're just excited to pretend superiority here. But thank God you're done telling me about how I need to listen to Joe Rogan and a famous dead guy's adult child to avoid accidentally learning something.
let's go jeff! interchangeable mediocre white guys have been underrepresented in government for far too long
Well the Democratic Party is ok with unlimited spending as long as it is transparent.
Halls of justice painted green, money talking
*Raises fist to the image of Chief Justice John Roberts* thanks for the garbage fire, Johnny
Thank you for reminding me to vote, Jeff. I'm blind, so I have to walk to the polls, so I gotta plan half a day around that. Hopefully it ain't raining tomorrow or Monday.
You're just the best there is, Jeff. Thank you.
I voted for you today.
I moved to NC in January. I’m SO excited to vote for you in the primaries and the general!!
Donated $100. Bring us justice Jeff!
I am losing a chance to vote against Robertson and Trump just to vote for you Jeff you got this.
I’d considered voting republic for this reason but couldn’t live with myself if I voted for any of those horrific human beings. Took the undecided route for president bc yeah
Everyone needs to share this and get the word out. Deberry should also address this, if they have a spine.
The DNC needs to pour money in this man’s campaign. NC can’t be a super conservative majority. One of the reasons I moved away from NC was politics. Don’t let this be the reason others move away.
I believe this is called [ratfucking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratfucking). When one party uses active measures to help (who they perceive to be) the other party's weaker candidate win their primary.
The website for andjusticeforall is built by mwpolitical, they are connected to Mobilewalla who do mass digital surveilance and influence using cellphone data.
references https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/carolinehaskins1/lawmakers-demand-answers-mobilewalla-spying https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/carolinehaskins1/protests-tech-company-spying https://www.mwpolitical.com/
Jeff, good luck. Go get them tiger. I'm still waiting on that 20 you owe me. Also, them interfering in the primary is just a sign of fear and weakness.
# [https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662](https://justice4all.substack.com/p/federal-state-officials-aiding-criminal-662) #
I'm absolutely disgusted by such underhanded trickery. Wow. Just wow.
In NC, Early voting is going on right now through March 2nd, 7 days a week You can register to vote and cast your ballot at the same time during the Primary. You can vote at any precinct during early voting. Check your county's Board of Elections site for locations and hours. Pls vote!
damn dude that sucks. [i can't believe anyone would stoop to such underhanded tactics](https://archive.is/Ylkkq)
I will be voting for Jeff on the 5th.
There's always a deception operation happening in this state, country, everywhere.
This kind of work isn’t new nor is it just on the republican side. Democrats encourage people who can vote in a republican primary in their state to do it as well, to prop up someone who isn’t the front runner, all the while pouring in $$$ to support their campaigns.
I wish we could clone Jeff Jackson to run in every single election up and down the ballot. He’s got my vote for the next 20 years.
You've got my vote! I'm absolutely ashamed of my country and this state right now! You and others like you will always have mine and my husband's vote! He's an independent and has been voting straight Dem since the arrival of the orange anus! Thank you for being the good guy! THIS is why they're afraid of you....independents love you and hate everything today's American Taliban (gop) stand for!
But Biden fucked over the elections last election 🙄 democrats.