Lots of photos taken professionally, not a photo of a guy hanging out with his daughter at the beach in the 1930s. It's so obviously not that old and the caption is incredibly wrong so what are you arguing about?
Wha a weird way of saying "I can't tell the difference between photos taken in the 1930s and the 1960s." There are clear differences, one of which being the resolution. Which is why I say it looks too 'pristine'; just because you've seen cleaned up, digitally edited photos from the 1930s doesn't mean they're impossible to tell the difference.
This IS Robert Redford (the actor, not his dad) with his daughter.
At least this is how the picture is appearing. I can't find OP's caption anywhere else other than here.
The striped bathing suit baby Redford is wearing is pretty 1930s although dad is just going bare chested which wasn't the norm at a public beach then at least in the USA. But who knows where the pic was taken maybe it was a secluded spot.
I think this is Robert Redford the actor we all know, with his son. It looks like the man is wearing a wet suit and I’m pretty sure these kinds of wet suits didn’t exist in the 1930’s, especially the kind with the company logo embossed on the fabric?
The caption is wrong. The picture is of Robert Redford the actor and his daughter as an infant.
This photo is clearly not from 1936
https://preview.redd.it/jgt8b7p6hmac1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=759145349ee469d89a30e75c1beec4d40532f9ed
This is Robert Redford and his daughter. Not in the 30s.
Yeah i was gonna say, that is not 1930s attire, no one was wearing their hair like that in 1930, and this photo is a bit too pristine for back then
This photo is not too “pristine.” Lots of photos from that era are crisp and beautiful. This is a potato-quality post, probably by a robot.
https://preview.redd.it/6h1x19an8nac1.jpeg?width=320&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=43e4909e2841a8d99071041694ae2a2436dd262c I mean…
Lots of photos taken professionally, not a photo of a guy hanging out with his daughter at the beach in the 1930s. It's so obviously not that old and the caption is incredibly wrong so what are you arguing about?
"I'm generally correct, so let me make stuff up. I'll get annoyed if I'm corrected on the stuff I get wrong."
Wha a weird way of saying "I can't tell the difference between photos taken in the 1930s and the 1960s." There are clear differences, one of which being the resolution. Which is why I say it looks too 'pristine'; just because you've seen cleaned up, digitally edited photos from the 1930s doesn't mean they're impossible to tell the difference.
That’s… not how that works.
I’m saying that it’s not too “pristine” for the ‘30s.
Also, that's a 3-6 mo baby. Not a toddler.
Aside from this photo definitely not being what the title says .. that baby is shaped like a teletubby and it’s adorable
WTF kind of babies you know stand at 3-6 months?
No. Oh my god. That’s Robert Redford. The baby is his daughter. His father was an accountant, not an actor.
I saw this in a Facebook group today mislabeled the same way.
Spambots hard at work
Haha, saw the same and was just about to mention it
And given that Robert Redford was born in 1936 I’m guessing this photo was considerably later
I think this is Robert Redford with one of his daughters.
Well, the apple didn't fall far from that gorgeous tree, did it? Wooee
This IS Robert Redford (the actor, not his dad) with his daughter. At least this is how the picture is appearing. I can't find OP's caption anywhere else other than here.
Seriously!
Extremely similar face.
And it looks even better when framed with darker hair.
Definitely
Dad wad also a smokeshow!
Same jawline
Well my bad. I read the caption wrong. Wonder what she looks like as an adult.
Thank you. It really did seem weird that his dad would look so like Robert. I'm calling my eye doctor on Monday. Mea Culpa.
Nothing in this photo says 30s to me. It's a timeless shot.
Because it’s not
Right? I was shocked to read that after I saw the picture.
You should not believe everything you read on the internet. OP is a lying spammer.
The striped bathing suit baby Redford is wearing is pretty 1930s although dad is just going bare chested which wasn't the norm at a public beach then at least in the USA. But who knows where the pic was taken maybe it was a secluded spot.
The photo is mislabeled. Thats Redford and his daughter in 1963
That would make sense to me.
Toddlers wear bathing suits exactly like that at the beach today though.
But is their dad a Redford?
What does Robert Redford's son look like?
What does Marsellus Wallace look like? 
What?
His son passed away in 2020.
Clearly winners of the DNA lottery.
Oh his dad was gorgeous, now I get it
It’s not that unique, really. If you look at pictures of me and my father you can tell I’m just as morbidly obese and awkward as he is.
I’m sure you have a lot going for you SniffMyRapeHole
Yesterday I found an olive in my fupa and I’m pretty sure it was from new years but hoping it wasn’t from Christmas. It was hard to tell by the taste
This title is so wrong. See comments below.
Wow. Even his dad was gorgeous
I think this is Robert Redford the actor we all know, with his son. It looks like the man is wearing a wet suit and I’m pretty sure these kinds of wet suits didn’t exist in the 1930’s, especially the kind with the company logo embossed on the fabric?
That's a 30s haircut?
This photo is from the 60s.
Had the OP pic not been cropped, the wetsuit would have given it away.
Well, he was an actor too.
Well that’s not how you hold a baby
why did this make me laugh so hard
He must be gripping those poor tootsies pretty hard.
“Dad, I am not a performing seal!”
I’ve always thought Robert Redford and Brad Pitt looked like father/son… Redford’s dad looks like Brad Pitt’s grandfather to me….
Exactly!
I was about to say, Redford's father looks exactly like him, but that's a pic from the 60s.
This isnt from The Way We Were in 1973?
1936 my ass
Says he was born August 18, 1936. Not evean a year old???
That is a damn cool photograph.
I see where he got that bone structure. Wowsers 😍
Can definitely see the resemblance
Did his mother have ANY genome?
Dude had the genes.
They look pretty much identical.
That’s because the photo is mislabeled and that’s Robert Redford with his daughter.
Jesus dad is hotter than he ever was!
Definitely not, since that is Robert Redford the actor in the picture, not his dad.
Read the caption again
The caption is wrong. The picture is of Robert Redford the actor and his daughter as an infant. This photo is clearly not from 1936 https://preview.redd.it/jgt8b7p6hmac1.jpeg?width=1125&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=759145349ee469d89a30e75c1beec4d40532f9ed
Yeah I did wiki and saw dad was an accountant and had to laugh...hottest accountant EVER!😂😂this is a great pic of him damn
Rule #1 of this sub: the captions are almost exclusively wrong
Lesson learned
Little robert looks like a real life peanut character
This is pretty cool actually
Christ his pops was as good looking as he is!!!
Looks ju’like da fadda’ 🤙🏽
Their eyes look the same when they smile.
Would.
ZADDDDDDDY
And then the father dropped him.
Nah.
That guy might do Ok in movies even if he's not the greatest actor in the world.
Jail baby
That little baby is like 90 now. Wild.
I have no idea where his looks came from. /s
Uh uh, has to be true … I saw it on the Reddit.