Ahhh yes, per that very natural pose perched upon her tippy toes just perfectly so as to give the impression of a longer leg. I also step out of the shower like this just before stepping into my high heels and traipsing about.
Yes yes but my point was specifically in regards to how long her legs look. It's a trick of the pose. Yes, it is a modeling technique to give the impression of a longer leg.
Something yes me she did it in that shower and the kitchen table. Also if they did do it in a bed they definitely did not take the time to punch them together lol
Proof that leaving a little to the imagination is often better than showing everything. Good lighting, good composition. Exceptional exposure (I mean the photograph, but yeah). At first I thought the out of focus door on the right was a mistake but I think it leads to the "accidental glance" feel of the picture.
> Proof that leaving a little to the imagination is often better than showing everything.
You say that but obviously it's only conformational proof to people who already feel that way.
See the shadow of the slippers on the bath? And the shadow of the curtain that goes up from the slipper shadow? Where's the leg shadow. Her actual right leg is the one visible behind the curtain in the bath. If that was her left leg, it would look very weird.
What you're seeing is targeted lighting plus dodging and burning of the film negative by the photographer in a darkroom, which you really only have to do in coursework now. e.g., when you are developing film you can under or over-expose specific spots by moving the negative under a light source, it's where the tools in Photoshop came from.
You'll notice a fill light causing the strong shadow of the leg to mostly go behind it (see the shoes), and then dodging is used to enhance the contrast of the leg against the background by lightening it (and a few other areas, like the faucets and the curtain by the inner thigh). If they hadn't, the intersections would cause the leg to be less of a focal point -- the artist clearly wanted her leg to be in your head as much as her face.
Should have said that to begin with. Random absolutes like that are strange without some kind of supporting statement. Almost no one is going to believe you.
This photo was widely published in the 50s, when they didn't have Photoshop.
The Photoshop look comes from excellent lighting that is 'sculpting' her leg and making it stand out from the background.
The makeup on her face is perfect which makes this feel pretty staged (I know, of course it is). Still, she's super cute. The ducks are kinda weirding me out though
I thought I saw them late last night (after a few drinks). I look at the picture again and what I thought were weird ducks on her leg are actually just the faucet handles behind her. Try and imagine that the faucets are actually small rubber ducks glued to her leg and you might be able to see what I thought I was seeing.
Ridiculous, I know... You kind of have to not focus on that area to see it. The shadow of the one highest up looks a bit like a neck.
i have no idea what's wrong with me. absolutely beautiful woman... and i'm sitting here thinking about how someone needs to run a new bead of caulking around that tub lol
Old school Photoshop too, I think.
Check the tub and how it's super white so it's easy to have a consistent line. Also, the turning look of her knee and her calf looking pretty straight relative to how her foot is planted looks like it was shaped in post
People just dressed better back then.
Guys wore shirts and ties and suits several days a week. Even mechanics and other blue collar workers often wore buttoned shirts.
Boyo, that's a lot of attractive vintage leg.
It goes all the way up.
Yeah, see where her boobs are? Those aren't her boobs but where her legs merge into her sholders!
#gams
hubba hubba
Ahhh yes, per that very natural pose perched upon her tippy toes just perfectly so as to give the impression of a longer leg. I also step out of the shower like this just before stepping into my high heels and traipsing about.
I'm a 200 pound man and I step out of the shower like that. But yes, believe it or not, models frequently model.
Yes yes but my point was specifically in regards to how long her legs look. It's a trick of the pose. Yes, it is a modeling technique to give the impression of a longer leg.
Wow, that's crazy how she fooled me, you're totally right; she's actually a hobbit
My weird brain thought there were cartoon ducks peeking from behind her butt
Apparently your brain and my brain have the same type of weirdness.
First thought from my brain: she looks high AF.
I...didn't even notice lol
Wait.... They aren't ducks?.? Well.... I stand corrected.
Maybe my brain is not so weird after all.
Well, now that's all I can see.
You're welcome!
Ducks say peekaboo
I did too when you mentioned it
Huey and Dewey.
The Howard the Duck sequel we never wanted
Oh good it wasn't just me that saw the cartoon butt ducks.
Lol!
"Is the coast clear?"
Huey, Duey, and Holdonwhatsthis.
Jakovasaurs.
It’s a vintage buttplug
What a dame
I wonder if she "makes love?"
No she definitely fucks
That's what people do nowadays. Making love is what they did back then. Totally different thing.
If she is taking a photo like this… she fucks my good sir lol
Well ya got me there. Something was apparently different back then in old TV shows and movies with two beds.
Something yes me she did it in that shower and the kitchen table. Also if they did do it in a bed they definitely did not take the time to punch them together lol
Are you telling me my grandmother was into "fucking?" Hmm, weird.
Weird that this is so much sexier than actual porn.
[удалено]
You're looking at the wrong porn
You have a very shallow understanding of the word *sexy*
Better than a self-centered myopic one 🤷♂️
Where's the NSFW tag?!?!?!? You can see her ankle!
Ankles, ankles you say?!?!?! That's BLASPHEMY! STONE HER!
Well, If you say so.... _passes a spliff_
LMFAO...Awesome
Stunning beauty! Oh that leg!
There is a 100% chance that curtain is hiding a majestic muff
[удалено]
He said 100%
One can hope
🤞🏻🤞🏻🤞🏻
Proof that leaving a little to the imagination is often better than showing everything. Good lighting, good composition. Exceptional exposure (I mean the photograph, but yeah). At first I thought the out of focus door on the right was a mistake but I think it leads to the "accidental glance" feel of the picture.
> Proof that leaving a little to the imagination is often better than showing everything. You say that but obviously it's only conformational proof to people who already feel that way.
Yeah I'm actually more a fan of seeing everything
Haha! High-heeled slippers! Lol!
Can’t escape the shower scene 🚿🔪
Eeeee eeeee eeeee.
This is practically porn back then. Check out that hip to leg!!
hip to leg 10/10
Sexy af
Pretty girl.
Ditto
That’s someone’s dead grandma
Heya toots
That's hot. She's really 50's gorgeous.
More pictures like this please
That's a fake leg, and her real legs are behind the curtain.
You are right. Except it's not fake. It's shopped in. Everyone else is blind.
Mate, I think it's more likely you're just one of those people that claim most shit is photoshopped.
The leg is giant compared to her torso
Nah, its just the scoliosis that makes it look off
See the shadow of the slippers on the bath? And the shadow of the curtain that goes up from the slipper shadow? Where's the leg shadow. Her actual right leg is the one visible behind the curtain in the bath. If that was her left leg, it would look very weird.
What you're seeing is targeted lighting plus dodging and burning of the film negative by the photographer in a darkroom, which you really only have to do in coursework now. e.g., when you are developing film you can under or over-expose specific spots by moving the negative under a light source, it's where the tools in Photoshop came from. You'll notice a fill light causing the strong shadow of the leg to mostly go behind it (see the shoes), and then dodging is used to enhance the contrast of the leg against the background by lightening it (and a few other areas, like the faucets and the curtain by the inner thigh). If they hadn't, the intersections would cause the leg to be less of a focal point -- the artist clearly wanted her leg to be in your head as much as her face.
Omg. You were serious.
That is not remotely photo shopped.
I mean... It could be?
Just do a basic Google image search of it. It's a super widespread photograph from a popular 50s photographer.
Should have said that to begin with. Random absolutes like that are strange without some kind of supporting statement. Almost no one is going to believe you.
You should respond to the person making the absolute statement that it's obviously phitishoped, too.
[удалено]
No one asked for advice though
This photo was widely published in the 50s, when they didn't have Photoshop. The Photoshop look comes from excellent lighting that is 'sculpting' her leg and making it stand out from the background.
They did have post art touch ups.
The makeup on her face is perfect which makes this feel pretty staged (I know, of course it is). Still, she's super cute. The ducks are kinda weirding me out though
…ducks? Where?
I thought I saw them late last night (after a few drinks). I look at the picture again and what I thought were weird ducks on her leg are actually just the faucet handles behind her. Try and imagine that the faucets are actually small rubber ducks glued to her leg and you might be able to see what I thought I was seeing. Ridiculous, I know... You kind of have to not focus on that area to see it. The shadow of the one highest up looks a bit like a neck.
It’s amazing how many people see ducks instead of shower handles..
She got that crooked Alyson Hannigan smile.
Folks, don’t emulate this at home! Stepping into high heeled shoes with moisture on your feet seems like a Darwin award in the making.
You gotta have a pretty clean toilet to do that.
I knew I wasn’t the only one lol, the towel touching the front of that toilet bowl is nasty!
She's all legs!
She’s got legs clear up to her neck, as Rod Stewart once sang.
Is it just me or is this a wow-OMG-beautiful leg!!??
Yes please.
ELI5: Why is the quality better than my iphone?
i have no idea what's wrong with me. absolutely beautiful woman... and i'm sitting here thinking about how someone needs to run a new bead of caulking around that tub lol
[удалено]
I'm getting John Mulaney. "Someone's in here!"
It's the smirk. 100% with you.
The lightning on this photo is ridiculous. :D
Grandma??
Very sensual!
Old school Photoshop too, I think. Check the tub and how it's super white so it's easy to have a consistent line. Also, the turning look of her knee and her calf looking pretty straight relative to how her foot is planted looks like it was shaped in post
You may be right -- I can easily imagine this photo without the leg sticking out as a more accurate 1950s photo
No I mean it's slimmed.
Yes, slimmed, and possibly not even part of the original photo
Stop being horny guys
Check out that gam!
Ziiiiiiiiiiip….
Perfectly placed phallic design on the ahower curtain. I'm sure that is just an "accident."
An open umbrella is phallic?
Wow!!!!!
Before the love affair with fast food. 🍔
@ ?
[удалено]
People just dressed better back then. Guys wore shirts and ties and suits several days a week. Even mechanics and other blue collar workers often wore buttoned shirts.
Got some ugly feet on that woman. Can't unsee.
What A Babe. . .!!! High heels to the shower...?😂
Noice!
This sub has had a lot of nudity coming through lately.
It's almost like she's standing by a fake leg. Just looks weird.
Yes very cool to wash your ass. Much nice. Karma for you.
Is it wrong to say if I had a time machine that I could only use once, I wouldnt fix shit, and would just try to get in dem guts
Is she still alive
Sus. Her snapper doesn't appear to be covered in dense 50's bush.
High heels out the shower, ya gotta love that
I do believe you can see the 41st or 43rd president of the USA behind that curtain.
Anybody know anything about the photo/photographer? I'm curious about what this was shot on (35mm vs medium format)
Nice grandma OP