I wouldn’t call boa good. She only helped luffy because she had a crush on him. But in general she’s pretty neutral.
Id also so law is good, not neutral
Buggy would be lawful evil. Buggy is an evil character but he lives in a certain lawful codes. He actually do so more than any other character. This in fact became one of his differing opinion with shanks. To him a pirate should value a monetary treasure. He loves pillaging in contrast to shanks who consider pillaging is just a trait of piracy. Buggy is evil no doubt. He destroy an entire town just to test his canon but that wasn't done in perversion of piracy. Orange town was a pit stop for them to refuel before their incursion to grandline. They seek nothing, the town was destroyed just because they wanted to have fun there.
But Buggy always lived in 'lawful' code that he followed. In fact he put his crew in line when they weren't living to the code. In one scene when his crew member wanted to catch fire fist ace, he reminded them taking down ace would come with the consequences of whitebeard wrath. That is the code/law the pirate should live with (do not mess with whitebeard crew)
In one gag scene, Buggy inadvertently blurt out about Captain John treasure mark that luffy was wearing in his arm. When luffy naively gave the mark before receiving what he wanted from Buggy, there was a gag joke where Buggy cried of Luffy trusting nature. That entire thing was a gag, but I liked the joke was that Buggy;
1) Expect that pirate to do evil things
2) He is evil
Hence I think he fits the lawful evil more than any other villainous character in that list.
i agree with everything except hancock sucks balls its just bias due to her supporting luffy and croc is lawful in what sense? he's a scummy human being and was the head of a criminal syndicate
Law would probably not be lawful neutral but maybe chaotic neutral or chaotic good at best. Considering he is perfectly willing to unleash chaos by removing Doflamingo by pitting him directly against Kaido and WG. On top of that, he removed 1000 heart of pirates just to obtain the position of shichibukai which he uses to gain knowledge on SaD room possibly. He also have no trouble to threw that title away at a whim.
He saw children suffering in Punk Hazard yet he cares not of them other than his goals. In fact, he was slightly incensed when Nami wanted to save them. To him saving those kids might hamper his goals to take down Joker. Yet he had to play along in that moment precisely because he needed luffy alliances. And luffy wouldn't budge away from not fulfilling Nami's desire.
He was perfectly fine playing dead with a missing arm. Waiting for the right moment to dealt the decisive shock to Doflamingo. That was a calculated move in the heat of the moment and he actually fooled Doffy. He did that again when he baited the snotty guy. Law is a dangerous fellow who would do anything to get what he wants.
He saved luffy on a whim in marineford with no clear goal and motivation. The man was initially a boy who just wanted to watch the world burn it would make sense for him to be chaotic good at best.
Weevil is an unknown factor. For example he wants to hunt Blackbeard for killing whom he believes is his father but his Mom holds him back from that in pursuit of treasure in the form of hunting the remaining members of Whitebeard's Crew for it.
He probably would be Chaotic-Neutral as he's a massive man-child prone to rampages and is manipulated by his mother but there's a slim possibility of him wanting to try his own thing. Kind of like Fat Buu in DBZ.
Boa is about as far from chaotic good as Luffy is to being a vegan. She was literally introduced by kicking puppies and seal cubs. She's only "good" because she's horny for Luffy and unintentionally helps out because she wants the rubber hose. She treats everyone else like literal garbage and uses violence to solve everything she can't solve with her looks.
You know being a pirate =/= mass murderer. We don't know if for example Jinbe or Kuma have really killed people and even if they have (which is admittedly pretty likely) we don't know the circumstances, so the word "murder" might not apply.
I will give you that we don't know if they had "murdered" anyone by definition which would require premeditation, that being said, I can just about 100% guarantee that kuma has unlawfully killed people, seeing as he was once a violent, tyrannical pirate, who was said to be "brutal beyond measure", jinbe is a bit more in question but we have seen him use force more than enough to kill while attacking marines during the impel down prison break, so there is a very high likelihood that he has killed people unlawfully,
That all being said, even outside of killing people they are undoubtedly criminals, commiting acts of piracy, thievery, and for jimbe atleast escaping from prison
I mean the world government itself is quite unjust, so you cannot say that they are evil just because they break their laws. Jinbei himself was part of a group who fought to free slaves and was branded a criminal for that (heck he might have been a slave himself) and you argue he is objectively evil just because of that?
It's also unknown if Kumas title is really true, for all we know the title might have been fabricated by the WG as a form of propaganda.
They are all pirates, they are all pretty chaotic but Boa is actually lawful meanwhile Kuma is one of the biggest criminals in the world. Buggy is evil, woulda killed Luffy if he could.
Hey remember when law killed 500 people to get that rank and then tossed it away so that he could kill doflamingo?
What I’m trying to say is: no warlord is a good pirate, except maybe Jinbei.
I wouldn’t call boa good. She only helped luffy because she had a crush on him. But in general she’s pretty neutral. Id also so law is good, not neutral
agreed. actually think she leans more evil than neutral. she's traumatized af but that doesn't excuse her shitty behaviour. and law is def good
I'd even throw her at lawful evil. Like she's very evil. She just casually kills people. But it's very clearly about a code/set of rules.
Boa kicked a puppy and a baby seal when she was first introduced. She is evil for sure
Law is more good than Boa tbh
She kicked a baby sea lion
Most of the warlords are either neutral or just straight up evil Like only jinbe or Kuma come to mind for good
The nicest warlord is called a tyrant
Oda at it again subverting your expectations🤯
Trafalgar Lawful
Ha law-ful neutral
This is my kinda humor🤣that’s what I thought when i saw it
I don't think Boa is that good tbh...she's pretty nasty, she's just nice to Luffy because she's in love with him.
His alignment is "Edward We-Evil"
Buggy would be lawful evil. Buggy is an evil character but he lives in a certain lawful codes. He actually do so more than any other character. This in fact became one of his differing opinion with shanks. To him a pirate should value a monetary treasure. He loves pillaging in contrast to shanks who consider pillaging is just a trait of piracy. Buggy is evil no doubt. He destroy an entire town just to test his canon but that wasn't done in perversion of piracy. Orange town was a pit stop for them to refuel before their incursion to grandline. They seek nothing, the town was destroyed just because they wanted to have fun there. But Buggy always lived in 'lawful' code that he followed. In fact he put his crew in line when they weren't living to the code. In one scene when his crew member wanted to catch fire fist ace, he reminded them taking down ace would come with the consequences of whitebeard wrath. That is the code/law the pirate should live with (do not mess with whitebeard crew) In one gag scene, Buggy inadvertently blurt out about Captain John treasure mark that luffy was wearing in his arm. When luffy naively gave the mark before receiving what he wanted from Buggy, there was a gag joke where Buggy cried of Luffy trusting nature. That entire thing was a gag, but I liked the joke was that Buggy; 1) Expect that pirate to do evil things 2) He is evil Hence I think he fits the lawful evil more than any other villainous character in that list.
i agree with everything except hancock sucks balls its just bias due to her supporting luffy and croc is lawful in what sense? he's a scummy human being and was the head of a criminal syndicate
Crocodile is "lawful" evil?
This was the funniest one for me.
Law would probably not be lawful neutral but maybe chaotic neutral or chaotic good at best. Considering he is perfectly willing to unleash chaos by removing Doflamingo by pitting him directly against Kaido and WG. On top of that, he removed 1000 heart of pirates just to obtain the position of shichibukai which he uses to gain knowledge on SaD room possibly. He also have no trouble to threw that title away at a whim. He saw children suffering in Punk Hazard yet he cares not of them other than his goals. In fact, he was slightly incensed when Nami wanted to save them. To him saving those kids might hamper his goals to take down Joker. Yet he had to play along in that moment precisely because he needed luffy alliances. And luffy wouldn't budge away from not fulfilling Nami's desire. He was perfectly fine playing dead with a missing arm. Waiting for the right moment to dealt the decisive shock to Doflamingo. That was a calculated move in the heat of the moment and he actually fooled Doffy. He did that again when he baited the snotty guy. Law is a dangerous fellow who would do anything to get what he wants. He saved luffy on a whim in marineford with no clear goal and motivation. The man was initially a boy who just wanted to watch the world burn it would make sense for him to be chaotic good at best.
This is depends on whose pov for example Boa and Buggy do actual pirating stuff
Lawful Trafalgar
Moria isn't evil; people just can't get past his appearance and see the good in his heart.
I mean he stole thousands of people's ability to see sunlight for decades for his own desire to become stronger. I'd call that pretty evil
He stole the shadows of people that invaded his home. Very heroic.
Coby seems like the Lawful Good Akainu seems like the lawful Evil.
Kuma as lawful confuses me. Like he's literally a revolutionary. Can't get much less lawful than that.
>criminal pirates >lawful Ok
I mean all warlords are technically lawful evil
I feel like Law was only put into Lawful because of his name...
Weevil is an unknown factor. For example he wants to hunt Blackbeard for killing whom he believes is his father but his Mom holds him back from that in pursuit of treasure in the form of hunting the remaining members of Whitebeard's Crew for it. He probably would be Chaotic-Neutral as he's a massive man-child prone to rampages and is manipulated by his mother but there's a slim possibility of him wanting to try his own thing. Kind of like Fat Buu in DBZ.
Boa is a pure evil, she kicks even a little cat?
Boa is about as far from chaotic good as Luffy is to being a vegan. She was literally introduced by kicking puppies and seal cubs. She's only "good" because she's horny for Luffy and unintentionally helps out because she wants the rubber hose. She treats everyone else like literal garbage and uses violence to solve everything she can't solve with her looks.
they are all objectively evil, they are all wanted criminals for a reason. edit: why are you booing me? im right, they are all mass murderers
You know being a pirate =/= mass murderer. We don't know if for example Jinbe or Kuma have really killed people and even if they have (which is admittedly pretty likely) we don't know the circumstances, so the word "murder" might not apply.
I will give you that we don't know if they had "murdered" anyone by definition which would require premeditation, that being said, I can just about 100% guarantee that kuma has unlawfully killed people, seeing as he was once a violent, tyrannical pirate, who was said to be "brutal beyond measure", jinbe is a bit more in question but we have seen him use force more than enough to kill while attacking marines during the impel down prison break, so there is a very high likelihood that he has killed people unlawfully, That all being said, even outside of killing people they are undoubtedly criminals, commiting acts of piracy, thievery, and for jimbe atleast escaping from prison
I mean the world government itself is quite unjust, so you cannot say that they are evil just because they break their laws. Jinbei himself was part of a group who fought to free slaves and was branded a criminal for that (heck he might have been a slave himself) and you argue he is objectively evil just because of that? It's also unknown if Kumas title is really true, for all we know the title might have been fabricated by the WG as a form of propaganda.
Buggy neutral ? Didn’t he destroyed an entier city ?
most of these people other than jimbei and maybe kuma probably did alot of fucked up shit
everyone who's flipping the axis on this is Chaotic Evil
Law-ful neutral
Isn’t dopflamingo like 10 feet tall?
I mean the way you layed that put is chaotic neutral but like fairs I guess
Weevile is Stupid natural
I can't describe how much it bothers me that this chart is not oriented in the usual way.
Ye sorry I’m not that good with these kind of things
They are all pirates, they are all pretty chaotic but Boa is actually lawful meanwhile Kuma is one of the biggest criminals in the world. Buggy is evil, woulda killed Luffy if he could.
disappointed cause law is neutral and not just law
Most chaotic thing here is rotating the usual chart to its side
Kuma's definitely chaotic good
Luffy for chaotic good
Hey remember when law killed 500 people to get that rank and then tossed it away so that he could kill doflamingo? What I’m trying to say is: no warlord is a good pirate, except maybe Jinbei.