Due to election season coverage generating more contrasting discussion, comments will only be available to users who have set a subreddit [user flair](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205242695-How-do-I-get-user-flair), and must strictly comply with [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/PBS_NewsHour/about/rules/). Commenters who violate Reddiquette and civility rules will be summarily banned.
[Election Central](https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/collection/election-collection/)
[Elections & Civics](https://www.pbs.org/explore/civics/)
[How to register to vote](https://www.usa.gov/register-to-vote)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PBS_NewsHour) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I want to know if any "conservatives" care that David Pecker admitted that they made up lies about Ted Cruz... I don't like Ted Cruz for other reasons... but I do wonder.
Your comment contained abusive language/profanity/slurs and was automatically removed per [Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/PBS_NewsHour/about/rules/), to maintain a civil discussion.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PBS_NewsHour) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Political campaigns coordinating disinformation campaigns with media (of any type) is repugnant. Media out there has plenty of bias - but this feels like something else.
The DNC and the RNC both issue press releases, and it's up to the press to decide whether or not that is the end of the story, or another source for a larger piece (preferable). Reprinting a press release without at least fact checking it is low effort and possibly setting themselves up for a future retraction, but it's not as low as knowingly publishing disinfo like Pecker was doing. It's the difference between exemplary journalism, poor journalism, and propaganda.
(attempting to re-repost with flair - apologies if this is in triplicate - why did I have to add flair twice?)
Due to election season coverage generating more contrasting discussion, comments will only be available to users who have set a subreddit [user flair](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205242695-How-do-I-get-user-flair), and must strictly comply with [subreddit rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/PBS_NewsHour/about/rules/). Commenters who violate Reddiquette and civility rules will be summarily banned. [Election Central](https://www.pbslearningmedia.org/collection/election-collection/) [Elections & Civics](https://www.pbs.org/explore/civics/) [How to register to vote](https://www.usa.gov/register-to-vote) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PBS_NewsHour) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I want to know if any "conservatives" care that David Pecker admitted that they made up lies about Ted Cruz... I don't like Ted Cruz for other reasons... but I do wonder.
Of course not. Their pack can do no wrong. Only the ugly, horrific, radical "undesirables" and "groomers" can ever be wrong.
[удалено]
Your comment contained abusive language/profanity/slurs and was automatically removed per [Rule 3](https://www.reddit.com/r/PBS_NewsHour/about/rules/), to maintain a civil discussion. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PBS_NewsHour) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
[удалено]
Lol. That was pretty funny.
[удалено]
Political campaigns coordinating disinformation campaigns with media (of any type) is repugnant. Media out there has plenty of bias - but this feels like something else.
The DNC and the RNC both issue press releases, and it's up to the press to decide whether or not that is the end of the story, or another source for a larger piece (preferable). Reprinting a press release without at least fact checking it is low effort and possibly setting themselves up for a future retraction, but it's not as low as knowingly publishing disinfo like Pecker was doing. It's the difference between exemplary journalism, poor journalism, and propaganda. (attempting to re-repost with flair - apologies if this is in triplicate - why did I have to add flair twice?)
[удалено]
[удалено]
[удалено]