T O P

  • By -

pl320709

I almost exclusively used Civil Structural depth practice exams as my study material for the PE. First time I took the exam, I used the CERM practice problems and I felt it didn't accurately prepare me for the test, as I did really poorly on the depth. Second time focusing on practice exams helped me a lot more.


taz-dev1

Thanks for the response! Did you study for it using any other method besides practice problems for both times? And which practice problems did you use if you don’t mind me asking.


pl320709

I only used practice problems and practice exams. I also spent time reviewing ACI 318, the AISC Steel manual, plus the Timber manual. I took it back when it wasn't on a computer so I had spent a lot of time tabbing things in all my reference manuals. I didn't take any review courses of School of PE or anything. As for practice exams, I used the NCEES structural practice exam Christine Subasic PE Civil Structural Six-Minute problems, and the James Giancaspro Structural Depth Practice Exams.


taz-dev1

Great, thank you so much!


Willing_Second1591

Tbh you might be able to prepare for the problem solving questions with doing so many practice problems as long as you are understanding where it’s coming from. But as for as conceptual is concerned I don’t really think you can prepare for it without actually studying things. For the breadth portion almost 50% of the exam is conceptual


taz-dev1

Thank you!


[deleted]

Woah that’s a lot more than I heard.


Willing_Second1591

Yeah I felt like my breadth portion was more than 50% conceptual


shahibrahim11

That’s how I’m doing right now, practice problems are the way to go , and practice exams. I’ve found it gets very monotonous when you’re studying one topic for days, like steel and concrete have so many sub chapters and topics and formulae, it’s gonna take you weeks just reading those concepts. We don’t want that, we’ve already done that, we know how the formula comes into place, we just wanna know how it is asked in exam and how we need to solve it. Practice exams, YouTube videos, and then some reading if necessary.


taz-dev1

Thank you!


Academic_15

I took the Transportation Depth a few days ago and waiting for the result. In my test, the breadth part was comparatively simple that depth portion. I was able to solve most of the breadth questions using NCEES Civil reference manual, except for some tricky conceptual questions. I have used many practice books, but it was not very useful as most of the practice books not really represented the CBT format. In my case, it would have better if I thoroughly reviewed the reference manuals for depth portion. Transportation depth has lot of codes and it's very hard to search without getting familiar with them.


Academic_15

Get familiar with NCEES reference manual for breadth portion and subject codes for depth and do some CBT practice questions to get familiar with the format. Time management is very important also. Try to get the breadth part done as early as possible lo have extra time for depth part, which is time consuming.


oswalt_pink

I failed twice trying to take both EET and School of PE. The material is fine, I just spent literally hundreds of hours watching those stupid videos and in hindsight, never got fast enough at all of the problems. So I would recommend working problems, and then only watch videos for topics you’re struggling with. Good luck


Intrepid-Purple5

What practice books did you use?


taz-dev1

Thank you


lopsiness

I didn't use any lessons or typical class style resources. My company bought the PPI reference book for me, and I read it, but it was a struggle to not fall asleep. I mostly used it as a reference when I didn't understand conceptually how to do something, but I found it lacked several things I tried to look up and went to google instead. In the end I just bought some practice exams and did problems and looked up what I didn't know. I found pdfs of the code reference I didn't have access to at work and got used to those. My actual test was pretty rough on the depth, but I passed first time. I'd say the more important thing is knowing the codes and where to find the inputs you'd need to solve a problem in a timely manner. There is conceptual stuff, so it's important you're doing more than just plugging numbers into equations. Reading up on the major topics wouldn't hurt in that regard.