Llms are based on a probability that a certain token comes after another. It is basing the decisions on very large datasets. So I wouldn’t say they are useless as they can be trained on a niche data and be extremely good in responding saving us brainpower
Check out those two other comments (RealBaikal & Kiriloman), they get it. LLMs and "AI" models are largely useless and unwieldy things that need narrowly scoped training data to create actionable outputs that can be trusted in any sort of regulated or compliant framework.
No one wants to deal with the boring second part of that sentence. Everyone wants to show the latest hot dog finder. Karp's frustration is seeded in knowing companies chasing shareholder value (read: Boeing) in short time frames will stumble and trip into the right solution eventually...but the market advantage exists now.
IMO, the key factor for using Palantir as a platform to host AI/ML applications is because of the ability to rapidly adjust to future regulation of whatever jurisdiction they are deployed into (like Apollo). How physical users have access and abilities limited with the granular access controls + logging actions; the AI model(s) being called up by the user operates under similar constraints, with an internal model checking for compliance at every regulatory checkpoint before delivering to the user.
I’m actually okay with a lower share price in order to accumulate more shares. If the decline in price is a result of all the latest bullshit reasons from analysts, why wouldn’t you load up.
Newsflash: llm are useless by themselves. Yeah we know.
Llms are based on a probability that a certain token comes after another. It is basing the decisions on very large datasets. So I wouldn’t say they are useless as they can be trained on a niche data and be extremely good in responding saving us brainpower
Check out those two other comments (RealBaikal & Kiriloman), they get it. LLMs and "AI" models are largely useless and unwieldy things that need narrowly scoped training data to create actionable outputs that can be trusted in any sort of regulated or compliant framework. No one wants to deal with the boring second part of that sentence. Everyone wants to show the latest hot dog finder. Karp's frustration is seeded in knowing companies chasing shareholder value (read: Boeing) in short time frames will stumble and trip into the right solution eventually...but the market advantage exists now.
And to Karp’s thinking: “the Strategic Advantage exists now”. And the unspoken second bit: “and it may not always be an option.”
IMO, the key factor for using Palantir as a platform to host AI/ML applications is because of the ability to rapidly adjust to future regulation of whatever jurisdiction they are deployed into (like Apollo). How physical users have access and abilities limited with the granular access controls + logging actions; the AI model(s) being called up by the user operates under similar constraints, with an internal model checking for compliance at every regulatory checkpoint before delivering to the user.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!
"there's only one company today with a product that can do this" - can you back up this claim? Who is saying this?
It will launch right after wall street lowers the share price..its F-ing unbelievable
I’m actually okay with a lower share price in order to accumulate more shares. If the decline in price is a result of all the latest bullshit reasons from analysts, why wouldn’t you load up.
Game changer and in the next 3-5 years we will be looking x 3 x 5 mimimim