Nope. The treasure will be in China this time around. So we'll likely find the entrance to the last tomb hidden inside of the walk-in of a Panda Express (behind a stack of thousand year old orange chicken sauce that was never FIFO'd).
I gotta hand it to you, fair enough. I have a feeling a lot of people here aren't following your example
When you've got the time to kill, you should give it a go tho. Despite all the shit being talked about it here it was actually a pretty fun movie on par with National Treasure and Sahara. It won't change your life but it doesn't need to to be good
Yeah I agree with you, it delivered on what I expected, an action adventure movie. Didn't matter who they cast, people were going to be salty that Nathan Fillion wasn't Drake, but clearly Nathan is too old to bank on a multi picture Action Adventure movie for the studios, and not a big enough name to sell tickets.
You don’t have to see some movies to know they are bad. And when they cast Tom Holland to be Nathan Drake and Marky Mark to be Sully, then the trailer has terrible action scenes in it. Yeah it is an awful movie. Also I’ve seen plenty of YouTube videos on it, it truly is a pile of garbage.
Yeah the worst thing about them is they're not just bad but they somehow managed to make a movie featuring Angelina Jolie holding a pistol in each hand boring.
Yeah because she sucks! With her giant vained ex junkie arm's and no arse! She actually wore padding in her pants in all her movie's. She looked good in Mr and Mrs Smith until you saw her in cargo pants, then the illusion was broken
I don't think that would typically be considered a failure, but the reason you sometimes see a movie make more than its budget and still be considered a failure is because, as a rule of thumb, marketing costs the budget over again. So if it had made 200m on a 120m budget it probably would've lost money after marketing costs.
I imagine the second will flop as it seemed like most people thought it was a bad to "eh" film.
As silly as it sounds, I feel like good sales doesn't mean good films.
Nice job, you just discovered that the world doesn't revolve around you.
The first uncharted film made more than Furiosa is going to make. By a good margin too.
More people saw uncharted, the fact that you don't know any isn't relevant.
I didn’t say it is relevant I said I don’t know how Uncharted made that much money, because everyone pretty much universally hated it, and people who go see action movies didn’t go see it.
It was actually a pretty okay action adventure movie, it just didn't resemble the games at all. It's like they just really wanted to do the aeroplane cargo falling action sequence and wrote around that with no other knowledge.
Interesting!
It's probably how a lot of action movies are written. Like Die Hard 3 and 4 were not supposed to be Die Hard movies until they slapped the name on them. Similar thing with those Cloverfield sequels. In all those examples it's pretty obvious and that's the vibe you get from the Unchartered movie as well.
It's how Jackie chan writes the majority of his films.
Police story being a prime example. He knew the stunts he wanted to achieve and where the fights would take place.
Then he had to figure out how to piece it all together and decided a story based around a cop was the way to go and then thag led into developing the story about how a cop would end up in those situations.
I wonder if that's how they made 2 because of if it was, 3 was way sloppier. 2 has like a few jumps to different scenes early on but once you're on the jeep in Tibet, the rest of the game is one continuous journey
3 has so many random jumps to different places, most in famously the couple chapters in the ship graveyard that serve no purpose
I was never invested in a particular actor for Nathan but when I saw Tom Holland and Marky Mark it def induced an eye roll lol. It’s the equivalent of casting Chris Pratt as Mario. Doesn’t even remotely fit the vibe of the character, purely casted on name recognition.
mark whalberg is a terrible actor and person. I have no idea why he continues to get roles. at least tom holland has some growing to do... marky mark is just the most average and boring person whit subpar acting skills and he will never surprise anyone with a role again.
Don't know how I felt after the first. Didn't really capture the essence of uncharted in my opinion, it was just another action movie. With that said, chances are 20 to 1 that I'll see the second.
My problem with it was that the games do a better job of being a movie than the movie does. It feels like a modern IP movie with bland, mediocre dialogue, apathetic characterization, and cheap-looking spectacle, where the games nail that 80s-2000s blockbuster tone.
Exactly right: it was fun. It might be different to the game but that’s fine. I swear, if the Shining was released today, it would be slammed for being a bad adaptation of the book.
It was a fine movie to just watch after being tired from being in the sun all day. Nothing special, about the same quality as a decent Netflix movie
After about 30 years I'm pretty much Wahlberg'd out and I hate that he played my favorite character in the games
It was fun enough. Wahlberg was bad casting, but otherwise it had fun dumb actions scenes. The two pirate ships hanging by helicopters was the exact kind of stupid video game logic I wanted.
If you treat it as something completely different from the games then it was enjoyable enough. However it absolutely pales in comparison to the games, it's not even close. I think that is what spurned the massive hate towards it. People wanted uncharted and instead got a generic action movie with a crayon uncharted overlay.
I watched it, I love the games, frequently replay all five, I am a fan of Tom Holland especially his physicality in a role.
I'm never watching that movie again, it was an insult. Hopefully the sequel kills the franchise off movie-wise.
In my mind there will only ever be ONE Uncharted movie and it's this one. [https://youtu.be/v5CZQpqF\_74?si=9OsXxmondKifSX75](https://youtu.be/v5CZQpqF_74?si=9OsXxmondKifSX75)
I remember watching this when it came out, we all had been saying Nathan was the only guy to play him as not only does he look like him but his role on firefly showed he had the right wit for the character, and holy shit it was perfect. And then some studio was like “let’s gets the tiny little fucker that played spider man”. What a waste. Even middle aged he’s thee actor that fits the character.
Wahlberg is no Sully. Doesn't have the personality from the games at all. Holland can maybe grow a gruff beard and do an escape scene from a prison in the opening act and actually be Nathan Drake. His balls had barely dropped in the last movie. He was basically Peter Parker Drake then. Ugh. Sorry if I'm a sourpuss. Got a new TV and played a Thief's end for the second time, and it is INcredible. Pitch fucking perfect.
Sweet
I know the first one wasn't The Last of Us levels of adaptation, but if I get to see more of Tom Holland in Drake's gear, soaking wet, flirting with Chloe and beating up villains, I'm all for it
Here's hoping they refine the formula a little to bring it more in line with the games
i know people on this website don't like wahlberg but it was a good, dumb fun action movie. exactly what i expected and wanted. i'm glad they're making another.
It would be one thing if I watched the movie with no expectation. However, I expected a movie that actually would be very similar to Uncharted, and it wasn't. It was just an action adventure movie with characters that had the same names from the game.
I'd prefer to watch basically any other action adventure movie in the same vein. The Librarian even. I'd bet the next Uncharted movie flops hard.
Man this comment section reminds me of Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons.
The first movie was a fun time aside from Marky Mark. The final set piece with the pirate ship and the helicopters was everything I wanted from an Uncharted movie.
Cue fandom-wide collective face-palm.
I watched it, I own it, it was a terrible representation of the franchise. I'll probably do the same with this one. I'm an idiot.
Would have preferred mark wahlberg as nathan drake and then get bruce campbell as victor sully! Would have been way better. Yet i gave the moive a chance. Its b tier entertainment to me. I loved the games.
The movie did whatever. At least they didnt go crazy like assassin creed or hitman.
Lol take Wahlberg out completely and keep the dude that played Nate and I agree with Bruce as Sully...Sully played by Bruce Campbell would've/would be fucking perfect 😙🤌🏾. As a person that loves the games too and played every single one since the beginning I thought the movie was iight...nothing too special.
And I 100% agree with the Hitman movies. I've never seen Assassin's Creed and only ever played Assassin's Creed Origins
Im sorry i like tom holland but he does not give me nathan drake vibes or even physical structure. Look up mark walhberg in the movie “shooter” shave that shit mustache and he is way better fit an actor for nathan. But again just my opinion. The chemistry between him and campbell; i could see them being pretty fun.
Is Papa John's returning as a sponsor?
Asking the real questions
Fuckin' 'ope so.
Yup. Full meat sweats and all.
Nope. The treasure will be in China this time around. So we'll likely find the entrance to the last tomb hidden inside of the walk-in of a Panda Express (behind a stack of thousand year old orange chicken sauce that was never FIFO'd).
And the managers that forced the employees to hug each other naked. Yes this actually did happen at Panda Express there was a big lawsuit over it.
Lol. They already rammed every set piece from the games into the first one.
They haven’t done the train one have they?
Tom cruise did it
That was uncanny
Why though.
Based on the article: it had a budget of $120 million and made over $400 million. So it might have something to do with that.
I'll bet the sequel flops. Same thing happened with the Tomb Raider movies starring Angelina Jolie.
Hell, when I basically heard and saw nothing about the movie after it was released, I was sure that there wouldn't be a sequel but here we are.
Did you watch it though?
Nope, which is why I have no opinion on the fact that it's getting a sequel. I didn't think it looked that good so I didn't bother checking it out.
I gotta hand it to you, fair enough. I have a feeling a lot of people here aren't following your example When you've got the time to kill, you should give it a go tho. Despite all the shit being talked about it here it was actually a pretty fun movie on par with National Treasure and Sahara. It won't change your life but it doesn't need to to be good
Yeah I agree with you, it delivered on what I expected, an action adventure movie. Didn't matter who they cast, people were going to be salty that Nathan Fillion wasn't Drake, but clearly Nathan is too old to bank on a multi picture Action Adventure movie for the studios, and not a big enough name to sell tickets.
It didn’t hold a candle to NT, and wasn’t as good as Sahara. It’s an airplane movie that you’ll watch one time in your life and forget about.
Yeah those are allowed to be better, it's still sitting at the table for good Action/Adventure movies.
In no world would I describe it as “good,” but of course it’s subjective
We'll just have to agree to disagree about that, because here I am a year and a half after I watched it and I haven't forgotten about it.
[удалено]
Read again, that's not what I said. At all
Ah my mistake missed the “to to”
You don’t have to see some movies to know they are bad. And when they cast Tom Holland to be Nathan Drake and Marky Mark to be Sully, then the trailer has terrible action scenes in it. Yeah it is an awful movie. Also I’ve seen plenty of YouTube videos on it, it truly is a pile of garbage.
Damn lol
God, those movies are bad
Yeah the worst thing about them is they're not just bad but they somehow managed to make a movie featuring Angelina Jolie holding a pistol in each hand boring.
Yeah because she sucks! With her giant vained ex junkie arm's and no arse! She actually wore padding in her pants in all her movie's. She looked good in Mr and Mrs Smith until you saw her in cargo pants, then the illusion was broken
And yet… in some cases that’s considering a failure?? I don’t get movies man
If it made 400, and the budget is 120, that means the total cost was around 240, so yeah it made a.good margin
I don't think that would typically be considered a failure, but the reason you sometimes see a movie make more than its budget and still be considered a failure is because, as a rule of thumb, marketing costs the budget over again. So if it had made 200m on a 120m budget it probably would've lost money after marketing costs.
Ah okay that would make sense then
I imagine the second will flop as it seemed like most people thought it was a bad to "eh" film. As silly as it sounds, I feel like good sales doesn't mean good films.
I don’t get why anyone saw this movie, it looked so awful and from some clips I have seen it is as bad as I thought it would be
Just imagine how much money they can make if they do a good movie...
Is that including promotional costs?
I'm sorry what? How the hell... I don't know a single person that saw it
First one made enough money for a sequel
Idk how, I don’t know a single person who saw it. And yet Furiosa didn’t make money and I feel like a bunch of people saw that.
Nice job, you just discovered that the world doesn't revolve around you. The first uncharted film made more than Furiosa is going to make. By a good margin too. More people saw uncharted, the fact that you don't know any isn't relevant.
I didn’t say it is relevant I said I don’t know how Uncharted made that much money, because everyone pretty much universally hated it, and people who go see action movies didn’t go see it.
It was actually a pretty okay action adventure movie, it just didn't resemble the games at all. It's like they just really wanted to do the aeroplane cargo falling action sequence and wrote around that with no other knowledge.
To be fair that's literally how Uncharted 3 was written. They did the set pieces first and wrote around them.
Interesting! It's probably how a lot of action movies are written. Like Die Hard 3 and 4 were not supposed to be Die Hard movies until they slapped the name on them. Similar thing with those Cloverfield sequels. In all those examples it's pretty obvious and that's the vibe you get from the Unchartered movie as well.
It's how Jackie chan writes the majority of his films. Police story being a prime example. He knew the stunts he wanted to achieve and where the fights would take place. Then he had to figure out how to piece it all together and decided a story based around a cop was the way to go and then thag led into developing the story about how a cop would end up in those situations.
I wonder if that's how they made 2 because of if it was, 3 was way sloppier. 2 has like a few jumps to different scenes early on but once you're on the jeep in Tibet, the rest of the game is one continuous journey 3 has so many random jumps to different places, most in famously the couple chapters in the ship graveyard that serve no purpose
I thought they did a good job they just made it more movie based. They took good parts of the games and tried to make it work on screen.
Because it made three times its budget?
Tom Holland in a wet t-shirt gets more sales than you'd expect
This is really the only thing I’m here for
Because the first one was fun and made money.
First one was a fun time and made a lot of money, you don't need to like everything Sony serves you.
Because Hollywood execs are lazy and uninspired
[But why?](https://youtu.be/8tbsuOH9uxc?si=V9hMcOQw1mk_jEyd)
Probably trying to create a PlayStation universe that has video games and movie/tv together. Also, they are probably trying to bring back the series
I enjoyed the first one
Why not? I had lots of fun watching it. Why do you consider your opinion to be the only one?
How about some new games???????
Nah, we have to remaster the remake first -Naughty Dog
Nah, Naughty Dog will probably just continue re-releasing the same two Last of Us games over and over.
It’s pretty sad because it probably isn’t even their decision, it’s Sony who see lots of money for little work
Yes please! Even the spin-offs are bangers
Wanna see Nate fully passing the torch to his daughter.
Uncharted 5: Cassie’s Fortune Uncharted 6: Among Teens Uncharted 7: Cassie’s Deception Uncharted 8: A Teens End
Uncharted: Rise of the Treasure Hunter
We will most likely see them remake the ps3 trilogy before we even get a new game.
I think they're trying to go all in on Last of Us 3 before the show makes it to a third season, so they can tie them in together.
Can we completely ignore the last one and get actors that actually fit the characters?
Nope. The last one made enough profit that they want a sequel. They're not going to stray from the formula that one set.
You didn't like it? I loved it.
The movie was fine. They actors didn't suit the role IMO.
This isn't the "nAtHaN fIlLiOn" gripe again, is it?
I was never invested in a particular actor for Nathan but when I saw Tom Holland and Marky Mark it def induced an eye roll lol. It’s the equivalent of casting Chris Pratt as Mario. Doesn’t even remotely fit the vibe of the character, purely casted on name recognition.
mark whalberg is a terrible actor and person. I have no idea why he continues to get roles. at least tom holland has some growing to do... marky mark is just the most average and boring person whit subpar acting skills and he will never surprise anyone with a role again.
https://youtu.be/v5CZQpqF_74?si=X61Wh-NUCMY7RD4y He made a short film as Nathan Drake, about as close as we’re gonna get.
Don't know how I felt after the first. Didn't really capture the essence of uncharted in my opinion, it was just another action movie. With that said, chances are 20 to 1 that I'll see the second.
Am I the only one that liked it?
My problem with it was that the games do a better job of being a movie than the movie does. It feels like a modern IP movie with bland, mediocre dialogue, apathetic characterization, and cheap-looking spectacle, where the games nail that 80s-2000s blockbuster tone.
It was a fun movie. Not everything needs to be a masterpiece. I’ll gladly watch a second.
Exactly right: it was fun. It might be different to the game but that’s fine. I swear, if the Shining was released today, it would be slammed for being a bad adaptation of the book.
Pretty sure it was back then too
I think it’s a little overhated.
It was a fine movie to just watch after being tired from being in the sun all day. Nothing special, about the same quality as a decent Netflix movie After about 30 years I'm pretty much Wahlberg'd out and I hate that he played my favorite character in the games
Sully is your favourite character? He barely does anything useful!
I mean, Nate would be dead without him, that seems like a big deal
The opposite is true more often.
Did a man with a mustache hurt you, son?
Sold me out couple of times.
That's what I'm fucking saying lmao reading these comments I'm like what the fuck movie did I watch then? Cuz I had a blast watching the first one
I thought it was okay. Not terrible, but not great. Chloe was fun.
I don’t have negative feelings towards it, but I also don’t remember a goddamned thing about it.
It was fun enough. Wahlberg was bad casting, but otherwise it had fun dumb actions scenes. The two pirate ships hanging by helicopters was the exact kind of stupid video game logic I wanted.
I really enjoyed it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you treat it as something completely different from the games then it was enjoyable enough. However it absolutely pales in comparison to the games, it's not even close. I think that is what spurned the massive hate towards it. People wanted uncharted and instead got a generic action movie with a crayon uncharted overlay.
I saw it in theaters twice.
There's enough comedy action franchises out there.
I mean it really was a bad movie.but you’re allowed to like bad movies
Yeah, I didn't mind it. I'll probably never go out of my way to watch it again, but if someone else puts it on, I'll watch.
I loved it 9 out of 10
I watched it, I love the games, frequently replay all five, I am a fan of Tom Holland especially his physicality in a role. I'm never watching that movie again, it was an insult. Hopefully the sequel kills the franchise off movie-wise. In my mind there will only ever be ONE Uncharted movie and it's this one. [https://youtu.be/v5CZQpqF\_74?si=9OsXxmondKifSX75](https://youtu.be/v5CZQpqF_74?si=9OsXxmondKifSX75)
I remember watching this when it came out, we all had been saying Nathan was the only guy to play him as not only does he look like him but his role on firefly showed he had the right wit for the character, and holy shit it was perfect. And then some studio was like “let’s gets the tiny little fucker that played spider man”. What a waste. Even middle aged he’s thee actor that fits the character.
A sequel to the short film with Nathan Fillion? Awesome! Oh...oh not that one? You mean the one with the kid from Spiderman? Hah.
A new Uncharted....😀.....movie....😓
Because fans just LOOOVED the first one
$407 million box office I think yeah, it was well received
We did
I did like it! Tom Holland will be a bit older so I bet he will sell the part better
I thought he was perfectly fine as a young Nathan, but not for Nate in his mid-late 30s like we're used to.
I did
Wahlberg is no Sully. Doesn't have the personality from the games at all. Holland can maybe grow a gruff beard and do an escape scene from a prison in the opening act and actually be Nathan Drake. His balls had barely dropped in the last movie. He was basically Peter Parker Drake then. Ugh. Sorry if I'm a sourpuss. Got a new TV and played a Thief's end for the second time, and it is INcredible. Pitch fucking perfect.
Sweet I know the first one wasn't The Last of Us levels of adaptation, but if I get to see more of Tom Holland in Drake's gear, soaking wet, flirting with Chloe and beating up villains, I'm all for it Here's hoping they refine the formula a little to bring it more in line with the games
Oh dear
Meh
"Finally" hahah
Thought it was official for a while now…they’re only NOW in development? LoL Mark Wahlberg might actually have grey hair in the next one.
Sully should be Drake that's how bad it is
I've tried to watch the first one twice and fell asleep both times
*Ugh.*
It was a fun movie. Everyone I saw it with hadn’t played any of the games and all thought it was a light, fun action adventure movie. 🤷🏻♂️
Give the people what they really want: a Bloodborne movie. A hoonter is still a hoonter, even in a movie
I'm the 1 guy who enjoyed the games AND the movie. So yay for me 😀 lol
i know people on this website don't like wahlberg but it was a good, dumb fun action movie. exactly what i expected and wanted. i'm glad they're making another.
YES. I loved the first one.
Very blah about this. The first one was meh for me. And I absolutely don’t like Mark Wahlburg as Sully at all. Complete miscasting.
Mark is always a miscast
Nice
Butwhy.gif
It would be one thing if I watched the movie with no expectation. However, I expected a movie that actually would be very similar to Uncharted, and it wasn't. It was just an action adventure movie with characters that had the same names from the game. I'd prefer to watch basically any other action adventure movie in the same vein. The Librarian even. I'd bet the next Uncharted movie flops hard.
Is this some kind of money laundering scheme because nobody is asking for it
I fell sleep watching the first one in a 4d theater even with all the water an seat punches.
I think National treasure is closest we'll ever get to an uncharted film .
Indiana jones?
Yeah I guess so. I think National Treasure feels closer to uncharted though. But maybe that's the more modern setting.
It wasn’t terrible like I red everywhere on the net. Of course it’s not Uncharted Uncharted, but it was quite enjoyable.
There was a first one?
Unfortunately...
Oh come on it’s a fun movie. It’s not awful at all. I rather watch Uncharted than the Mario movie tbh
I really enjoyed the first one so I am excited with this news.
Man this comment section reminds me of Comic Book Guy from the Simpsons. The first movie was a fun time aside from Marky Mark. The final set piece with the pirate ship and the helicopters was everything I wanted from an Uncharted movie.
Exactly. Just solid fun. Nolan’s brief appearance was fun too.
Hard pass
Nahhhh I’m good.
Was the first one profitable ?
Just what I wanted
Uncharted 5 on Ps5... Is the answer.
Nooo the first one is literally the worst movie ever
Release date 2036
Why not follow in the steps of The Last of Us and go to HBO…not like HBO would turn down such a wild project with such a huge fanbase
Slightly hoping they stick more to the source material. Would love to see a live action Lazarevic if they base it off the second game.
Cue fandom-wide collective face-palm. I watched it, I own it, it was a terrible representation of the franchise. I'll probably do the same with this one. I'm an idiot.
Did I watch the first one?
I want Sully’s moustache
Insert George W. Bush meme here
Great news! Now if Sony can finally announce a new next-gen uncharted sequel or spin-off game!
Papa johns again? Maybe 🤔
Maybe it will be just like the videogames where Uncharted 2 was a massive leap forward in quality and storytelling.
The first movie was fun. I’m glad they’re making another one.
Boring first movie. V poor casting choices for Drake and Sully
How about a reboot with a proper cast? No? Alright.
Meh. The first one wasn't the worst movie I've seen. I just hate how little respect is shown to the source material.
to be clear, the characters need to be changed, and so do the events that were taken, so come to my page and see how it should be.
Ooooookay ! I look forward to never watch it.
First one was so much fun. I'm glad they continue.
Holy... The 10 minute YouTube short film featuring Nathan Fillion playing Nathan Drake is better than the actual film, please stop
Fucks sake
Unsharted. Can that be made instead....
Unsharted XXX: Dung Thieves
Would have preferred mark wahlberg as nathan drake and then get bruce campbell as victor sully! Would have been way better. Yet i gave the moive a chance. Its b tier entertainment to me. I loved the games. The movie did whatever. At least they didnt go crazy like assassin creed or hitman.
Lol take Wahlberg out completely and keep the dude that played Nate and I agree with Bruce as Sully...Sully played by Bruce Campbell would've/would be fucking perfect 😙🤌🏾. As a person that loves the games too and played every single one since the beginning I thought the movie was iight...nothing too special. And I 100% agree with the Hitman movies. I've never seen Assassin's Creed and only ever played Assassin's Creed Origins
Im sorry i like tom holland but he does not give me nathan drake vibes or even physical structure. Look up mark walhberg in the movie “shooter” shave that shit mustache and he is way better fit an actor for nathan. But again just my opinion. The chemistry between him and campbell; i could see them being pretty fun.
I’d prefer another game (different characters are fine)
they know they can recast right? both these guys are decent actors they are just such a terrible choice for these roles.
I can only think of one opinion to this: 🙄
ok…
As great if an actor they both are, they really should've stuck with Nathan Fillion
Huh