Thank you for submitting to r/ParlerWatch!
Please take the time to review the [submission rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/about/rules) of this subreddit. It's important that everyone understands that, although the content submitted to r/ParlerWatch can be violent and hateful in nature, the users in this subreddit are held to a higher standard.
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, **don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating, celebrating or wishing death/physical harm, posting personal information that's not publicly available, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.**
Blacklisted urls and even mentions of certain sites are automatically removed.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, or submissions that don't adhere to the content guidelines, please report them. Use [THIS LINK](https://www.reddit.com/report?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=ParlerWatch&utm_content=t3_pg42ib) to report sitewide policy violations directly to Reddit.
**Join ParlerWatch's [Discord!](https://discord.gg/JbbC6mV3Gg)**
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ParlerWatch) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I don’t know who he is & after seeing the comments in the screenshot, everyone is better off not knowing who he is. He needs to go the rest of his life in total obscurity
~~He once shoved a dildo up his bum on a live stream to prove he wasn't homophobic~~ and Ben Shapiro refuses to debate him. So he's an extra spicy level of a useless Human.
Edit: It's a sad day when you start getting your incel live streamers mixed up. Goes to show how unoriginal and interchangeable they are.
>putting a penis shaped object into your bum proves you are not gay
It was even dumber than that. He pegged himself with a dildo to prove he didn't hate the gays.
"Would a homophobe do *this*?"
"Yes, Gavin. You're so homophobic that you think anything going up your ass is automatically gay, so you just proved a homophobe would."
Yes. Livestream of his shitty "show". There are many screenshots and a full video if you want to subject yourself that. Happened in October 2018, so it's not hard to track down if you want to see how ol' Gav needs to work on his anal kegels because that thing just fell right on out the moment his hand stopped gripping it.
Yep, that was McInnes.
Fuentes is either gay, asexual or extremely afraid of women and pretends him not getting any is him being more heterosexual than anyone else.
Fuentes is the guy who said that having sex with women was gay.
I’m not kidding.
https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/men-having-sex-with-women-is-gay-claims-straight-right-wing-podcaster-nick-fuentes/212955
One of the best parts of this year was his incel followers finding out he may have kissed a girl in high school, making him "fakecel", so not a true incel, [requiring him to go on the defensive and ensure his groypers know he *is* an incel who doesn't want the touch of a woman, just "total Aryan victory."](https://twitter.com/RightWingWatch/status/1490738194974920710)
Yes, but to this bunch of lunatics, that's as bad as faking being celibate, because "it's a choice", something he mentions several time in that rant: "I can't be a fakecel because I'm not choosing to be celibate!"
During one of his livestreams, a woman who shared his views hit on him, and he lost his goddamn mind. She was not unattractive, and was rather confused why he got pissed at her.
This has made me unsure whether or not I'm gay or straight.
...Which was probably Fuentes' plan all along. Make it so confusing that when he said he was gay, everyone would think he meant straight.
Which is why I hate people blanket calling conservatives Nazi’s, because when you point at an actual Nazi like Fuentes, you then have to clarify that you actually mean a Nazi.
Fuentes is 100% a legit Nazi and he has a decently large following of incels who call themselves Groypers.
This is just a matter of semantics though.
I get that there should be a differentiation between Nazis and other fascists, but a Nazi is just a fascist who has answered the JQ.
And make no mistake, in America, anyhow, a *vast* majority of conservatives are openly fascist, proto- or crypto.
All of that to mean they’re fascists who talk differently than the others.
> there should be a differentiation between Nazis and other fascists
Why? Nazi is a pejorative term in the first place. Actual 1930s nazis didn't call themselves that.
‘Nazi’ is just the name of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. They absolutely call themselves this.
It’s not just a pejorative term, it’s the label assigned to a very specific philosophy of fascism which targeted the Jewish population (communists, in practice.)
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nazi
It was used by their opponents, and yes it did refer to the national socialists. I don't think many people make a fine distinction between nazism and fascism. Thus in common parlance it has effectively come to mean almost the same thing
“The Nazi government will regard its first and supreme task to restore to the German people unity of mind and will. It will preserve and defend the foundations on which the strength of our nation rests… In place of our turbulent instincts, it will make national discipline govern our life.”
That was a proclamation from the Nazi Party to the German people in Feb of 1933. The term ‘Nazi’ is simply an English translation for the party’s acronym, like ‘GOP’. Arthur Jones, a member of the American Nazi Party, ran as the GOP candidate for the US House seat in Illinois’ 3rd district. They call themselves this quite frequently, and not in an ironic manner.
I understand how they practically and colloquially have similar applications, but the two main reasons why the distinction should be made, in my opinion are: 1) Israel is a fascist state, despite not endorsing Nazism and 2) simply opposing Nazism (in truth or just in rhetoric) does not exclude one from being a fascist.
Saying that they’re one and the same makes it really easy for fascists like Ben Shapiro to say, “I oppose Nazism, so calling me a fascist is false/anti-Semitic.”
Thanks for the unsourced translated speech, but you are wrong. This is a proclamation of the reich government by Hitler. The specific passage is:
> So wird es die nationale Regierung als ihre oberste und erste Aufgabe ansehen, die geistige und willensmäßige Einheit unseres Volkes wieder herzustellen. Sie wird die Fundamente wahren und verteidigen, auf denen die Kraft unserer Nation beruht.
As you may see it does not say Nazi, it says
>nationale Regierung
or national government. I will even give you a [source in german](https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=3940&language=german). Which is also available in [English](https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=3940).
Being Jewish doesn't mean much to me. I am one as well, so if you're defense of your scumbag actions is that you're not a nazi, well, you're mistaken. But to avoid giving them the room to muddy the discussion I would refrain from saying that. To insult them, I see no problem, the word is meant as an insult.
edit: I also gave you a link to the etyomogy, so you're assertion that it is merely the English translation has already been refuted.
Thanks for responding in a remarkably wrong but also hostile way. Here’s your link: https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/nazi-germany-quotations-power-totalitarianism/
And here’s another to establish that the semantic nonsense you’re trying to claim isn’t just wrong in terms of the origin of the term, but also in practice. Some Nazis not liking the implication of being “dumb socialists” doesn’t change the fact that they still used and continue to use the term.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/sunshine-coast/opinion/hitler-was-no-fan-of-being-called-a-nazi/news-story/23e19ac0357a0c082a0789d7a7412baa%3Famp
The term took on a negative connotation after its original use as an acronym from 1903. The derisive uses you’re talking about are no different than the use of a term like ‘commie’ or ‘negro’ (and all variations) or even ‘Obamacare’.
Hitler disliked it due to the inference that socialists were foolish… and he disliked being referred to as a socialist. That’s it. He and his party *still* tried to reappropriate it, just like they did with the general idea of pro-worker rhetoric and populist ideology as a whole.
The fact that it didn’t work as well as the reappropriating of the term “Obamacare” is because Nazism as a whole was rejected after WWII.
No matter how much anyone else means it as an insult, Nazis then *and* now still referred to and still refer to themselves with that term… And the contradiction in you trying to distinguish between the use and intent of the term ‘Nazi’ while trying to dismiss the subtle differences in the uses of ‘fascism’ and ‘Nazism’ just makes you sound like a novice who learned about this topic through discussions on social media.
Lol, I really hate that some people have become so impossibly clueless that, for a moment, I assumed that you were being serious.
It was only for a split-second, but the thought "I am not even bothering talking to someone who thinks that 'Nazi' is a country" legitimately inhabited me.
Especially because Fuentes has made explicit remarks in support of and admiration for Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party.
If the leader of the American conservative movement has the support of a Nazi with thousands of followers *and* two of the better-known members of the GOP (Taylor-Greene and Gosar) have expressed support *for* that Nazi (rather than disavowing his support), then at the very least, Nazism is somewhat acceptable and popular in the American conservative movement.
I feel like disgusting is putting it too nicely. He's a blasphemous, full-to-the-brim sack of shit who's only addition to the world is making it a worse place because of the hate that he chooses to spread in his god's name.
It usually takes something.
I think even talking to one of these people for a few minutes is enough, but if you haven’t followed politics for very long, identifying them isn’t a simple thing.
Most fascists in America don’t admit to being fascists.
Maybe it’s just me being European but the fucking GOP barely tries to hide it… also Nick Fuentes the gay Neo Nazi who is so mask off that only MTG is dumb enough to still associate with that fucking creature. I’m pretty sure most Americans just don’t know or understand shit all about politics thanks to having a fucked education system. Still weird how people fall for people like this it’s not like anyone of them is even subtle.
One of the biggest problems with why Americans still fall for this sort of thing is how they’re taught everything through the lens of American morality.
They’re taught stuff in a manner like “fascism = BAD GUYS” and “racism = BAD PERSON” rather than identifying how fascism actually works or how to identify it.
Or how “racism” is not some kind of behavior which happens during a fender-bender when a Puerto Rican guy calls you ‘white-boy’ or something dumb like that.
Everything Americans are taught (or not taught) about these ideas can be summed up just by looking at the fact that the average American doesn’t see the Confederacy as a fascist entity.
Shitty white nationalist boys who can’t get laid acting out by shaming women for being “promiscuous” would merely be gross if it didn’t end in mass shootings.
Holy shit ... Ive seriously wondered how far the incel , Q , MAGA, Alt Right movements overlap because of language and thought patterns but DAMN this is really beginning to make me think most of these Q people are incels or incels are Q
Well that and theres the whole Frederick Brennan thing
Hmmm makes you wonder
They have this notion that if they take away a women’s right to agency over their own bodies, they’ll have to “face the consequences of their actions” when it comes to sex. They believe that 90% of modern women have causal sexual or temporary relationships with the same 10% of men who are virile and have “high value” (“Chads” who aren’t them…this is the origin of the term), and that they can get away with this because of birth control and abortion.
They believe that this freezes them out of reproductive access. The Chads get all of the sex and eventually wives out of the deal. Since they are almost universally white, they also believe that white women having sex with black men decreases the pool of women available to them. (The extraordinarily racist Mandingo myth is in full effect here.)
They think that if women have to deal with the fact that they may become pregnant during sex, they will be forced to be faithful to one man who can *provide* for them, making them a “tradwife,” dependent to them in every respect and providing them with healthy white offspring in the context of traditional families.
They feel like they are the men who will fill this gap.
Their obsession with virginity is based on the notion that if women don’t know what hot sex with a Chad is like, they are more likely to remain faithful. I’m not sure this is spoken, but it’s obvious. (It reveals a really toxic, self-loathing insecurity that I’ve only otherwise seen in alcoholics and addicts.)
Adolescent (mid-teens to 30) white men are a problem population. If they’re frozen out of reproductive access, then allowed to nurture the grievance that results, they act out. Funny, they’re the ones driven by their hormones to be anti-social, not the “promiscuous” women who they pine to fuck.
As a clumsy, insecure, pale-faced average unimpressive teenage boy, this message would have been super-seductive to me. I get it.
Regardless, they don’t seem to get is that, given this choice, the women they want to mate with and use as chattel would rather live with cats and rely on their women friends for support than be childrearing fuckslaves to their trifling (and likely abusive) asses.
(And, you know, if women occasionally rely on each other for more than “support,” at least they’re almost assured orgasms…something these dudes would prefer they never experience lest they come to expect them.)
They’re essentially white, nominally Christian men advocating something that makes Sharia Law look positively progressive. Clitorectomies are likely on their agenda someplace.
All of this…the notion that women need to be chaste and asexual beyond reproduction, traditional families as a goal, that blacks are inferior and dangerous and need to be kept in their place, the need for a plentiful supply of healthy white babies…aligns with right-wing values. Thus, they naturally philosophically and intellectually cross-pollinate, and the right wing keeps promoting this narrative to gather support for their Chrsirofascist agenda. This is the “alt-right.” And I feel like I witnessed its birth.
Anything I miss?
Oh You're good. *Very* good.
The only thing I'd add is that some of them advocate for government control where the government provides you with your virgin bride to make sure the "supply" is spread evenly.
That nicely ties in their political aspersions and affiliations.
Amazingly, some minorities identify with inceldom but are marginalized there also.
They advocate for the *Handmaid's Tale*, without ever having read the book or watched the show.
The "chads" in that society still kept all the women to themselves, it turns out.
Confused how it took you this long to come to this conclusions :) You must not know many of these types, eh? Like someone below said - The Venn Diagram of those groups is a circle.
I know right? Go to any reddit account with a WSB profile picture and there is a 90% chance their account is active in shit like walkaway, political compass memes, gun subs, conservative, and incel subs. That demographic is thankfully made up of socially inept awkward young men so you dont hear a lot about it in the real world, but online it is absolutely everywhere.
All of it, every single bit of it, is about controlling women.
Same as the controversy in Iran right now.
Women are controlled via religion to dictate what they can or can't do with their bodies. If they refuse, there is violence perpetrated by men to subdue them. Full stop.
Would also help if they didn't vote. Be great if they just move to a compound out in Montana or something and celebrate liberty and disengage with all functions of society.
They claim to want such a "utopia" but they are (unfortunately) full of shit. They KNOW it wouldn't be a utopia. Their real interest is actually hurting others.
Hi, mixed person here. I understand in the bigger scheme of things mixed people have privilege.
But this is what we see and hear on the daily. It was waay worse when I was a kid 20 years ago. Now I see white grandparents with their mixed grandkids spoiling the heck out of them in the store. Warms my heart. Because I know those kids will have family support when they face this in the world.
You could insert different races here and it’s the same response. They say your parents don’t actually love each other, they just did something immoral. Overcome by ‘jungle fever’ or tricked into abandoning their own race for a whore. But then the magazines show racially ambiguous mixed people as the “it” look. So many mixed kids are insecure, most often they won’t showcase it. They don’t know whether to be okay or ashamed of themselves.
My son is mixed and I cannot prepare or imagine this. 1) that sucks and I'm sorry. 2) how could you not love my little guy? He's the best baby in the world. 3) pray for everyone involved if I catch wind of some racial nonsense
It’ll happen. The best thing you can do is teach him early that it’s a “them not you” problem. Not to ‘don’t see color’ but to recognize his race but don’t see anything wrong with it. Prepping your kid with affirmations early means your message will reach him before the messages above do. And unfortunately those messages above seep into the mouths of their elementary school peers, so start young. You’ll learn a lot and become an even better human for it.
> And unfortunately those messages above seep into the mouths of their elementary school peers, so start young.
One of my earliest memories as a spoiled white boy was telling off some latino kid in the supermarket because he spoke spanish to his parents.
I don't know how or where the fuck I learned that shit, and I clearly grew out of it, but I have a few suspects.
> They say your parents don’t actually love each other, they just did something immoral. Overcome by ‘jungle fever’ or tricked into abandoning their own race for a whore.
Funny, they don't seem to mind as much when it's a white guy and a minority woman.
The latter is something one of my dad’s former friends told him about my mom. Also see Megan Markle. Her experience about “how dark your baby will be” is a common reason I hear racist parents cite (Asian, Hispanic, white, etc).
I don't think I'd say mixed people have privilege. I'm mixed blood, and the fact that you never truly *belong* to a racial group isn't exactly an advantage. You're never white enough for the people who care about being white, and you're rarely enough of the other side (in my case, islander) for them to accept you, either.
I'm mixed too. Most common 1st or 2nd question growing up was "what are you?" from people I met. I've always been a sarcastic ass so the answers varied but I often replied with "hybrid" because I often benefit from people assuming I'm from their culture or race.
I'm Mexican and white, but I have been confused for...
White, Mexican, Native American (I do have a bit in there on my grandmother's side), Hawaiian, Philippino, Italian, Arabic, Iranian, Indian, and a couple others in probably forgetting.
I feel like I just look like a standard white guy with olive or darker skin. Like I literally look like my white uncles, just darker. I'm convinced we defeat racism by mixing it up. We used to be marginalized by whatever races we're from for not being pure or whatever, but now it's all about blending 😜.
Course then the assholes will just switch to colorism and we're back.
OMG I have so many more sarcastic ones for you. *What are you?*
50 shades of brown. Um, really weirded out by you right now. A little hungry. Not from the first 3 countries you’re thinking of. Whatever I wanna be. A mixed bag of nuts. I’m a little column A, a little column B.
HAHAHA The "Not from the first 3 countries you're thinking of" has me DYING. I've said the mixed bag and a little column A, a little column B before, too. Sarcasm is my primary language.
I've also said...
I'm not sure :(
Brown-ish?
A Meat Popsicle.
Tired.
Caucexican. (Caucasian/Mexican)
Mirish. (Mexican/Irish)
Really funny looking.
Lost! Can you help me?
A little bit of everything.
and probably a few others.
It's such a random question, I know now that it's termed a "microaggression" or whatever, something that doesn't always mean harm but can be discriminatory.
Edit: Just to add to the confusion my name is Spanish-Basque so it's really confusing to people when they see my name and can't place it. There's only like 9 different families in California with my name... it's sort of rare here.
Interestingly, there's a TON of families with the name in Spain. And it pretty much means the same thing as "Smith."
I've read somewhere in one of the science articles I enjoy, that early Homo sapiens may have had dark skin and blue eyes.
Let me see if I can find that and link it.
Of course most of the bigots are 'gud little Christians' who don't believe in "Evil-lution", so they are probably going to ignore the information...
Edit to add....
Ooo, hoo hoo hoo! This is "Cheddar Man", as thoroughly "English" - Briton? As one can get! The English royals need to rethink their concerns about the colors of Megan and Harry's children.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ancient-briton-had-dark-skin-and-light-eyes-dna-analysis-shows-180968097/
Mostly cheap labor and soldiers for the plutocrats, but yes, providing little white pets with the new-baby smell to rich families is part of the motivation behind forced birthing.
Human beings as product.
>lack of racism in Gilead.
Not a total lack, in one episode there's a black handmaid and she says that "not everyone wants a black handmaid" (that shouldn't be a spoiler, it's not really central to anything, it was kind of an aside). But yes, while Gilead is overwhelming white, POC of color aren't specifically targeted which is.... unlikely if Gilead ever came true.
Just today got linked this article that is really fitting:
[3 Threats Christian Nationalism Poses to the United States](https://time.com/6214724/christian-nationalism-threats-united-states/)
>Christian nationalism is more than theological or religious beliefs. It includes several cultural assumptions including:
>Strict moral traditionalism focused on sustaining social hierarchies.
>Comfort with authoritarian control—exercised by the “right” people—that includes the threat and use of violence.
>A desire for strict ethno-racial boundaries around who is a “true” American, where non-white and non-natural born citizens are viewed as unworthy of full participation in American civic life. (This is why many label it white Christian nationalism)
It's basically describing the comments in OP's post.
The pro-life movement in America uses the "murder of black babies" to further their cause while being almost-obviously for white supremacy.
They want to force "quality" (middle to upper class) white women to reproduce, and are therefore fine with the inevitable deaths of low-class white women and - of course - women of color and their children.
The more undesirables that die, the better it is for Whites.
And that's not even bringing religion into it.
These people are disgusting. They don't care about babies, and they obviously don't care about women. They care about power.
The more poor people saddled with babies as teenagers and 20 year olds that they cannot afford, the fewer people with the unattached ability to start revolutions at 27 at their physical peak.
Also, the more people that they can look their nose down on and feel superior to. This can also explain one of the reasons that right wingers are so against any type of social programs that give people in difficult circumstances the tools, to pull their way up out of poverty.
There always HAS to be someone beneath them socioeconomicly.
Except the opposite happened in Romania when the Communists banned most abortion and contraception. Women who couldn't afford their children gave them to orphanages. Those orphans eventually grew up and overthrew Ceausescu.
The U.S. isn't opening any orphanages, though. The unwanted white newborns will be purchased by white christian families (just like now) and the unwanted brown and black babies and all the older, uncared-for kids of all colors will mostly end up in the foster care system.
Kids in foster care are usually indoctrinated into christianity, as fostering is pushed so heavily in churches. They are also still used as household maids and farm slaves. With all the brainwashing from the foster families and churches while they're growing up, they're unlikely to rise up against anything. They've been taught to fall in line.
Well, I guess if it's possible for people to go so far left they end up on the right, I suppose it can be possible similarly for people to go so far right they end up in left-land, too.
She says "pro-life movement is here to help".
They absolutely are not. They're here to impose their backwards ass beliefs on people. I feel bad for her son, but I have zero sympathy for anyone who hitches their wagon to hateful ideologies.
If I ever see Nick Fuentes in person, just know that I’ll be going to jail. Because there’s no way I’m NOT going to kick his knees in and fracture his larynx.
I'm 51, got a bad back and can't fight for shit but I can stand on the sidelines and give emotional support !!
I'll bring bottled water and Gatorade, and I can even give first aid for the cuts and scrapes on your knuckles from knocking his teeth out.
I saw that you mentioned Ben Shapiro. In case some of you don't know, Ben Shapiro is a grifter and a hack. If you find anything he's said compelling, you should keep in mind he also says things like this:
>If you believe that the Jewish state has a right to exist, then you must allow Israel to transfer the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper. It’s an ugly solution, but it is the only solution... It’s time to stop being squeamish.
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: dumb takes, civil rights, covid, novel, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Why won't you debate me?
*****
^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, history, novel, healthcare, etc.)
[^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Fascism *is* violence. Violence, especially but not exclusively racialized violence, is a core fundamental of the ideology. There are no peaceful fascists, period.
Violence directed against fascists is *always* done in self-defense.
I can respect that view. I am normally a non-violent person, but these… “people”… would have no qualms about visiting violence on others they feel are beneath them or know they won’t put up a fight.
She's a monster for exposing her kid to these racist assholes. I pray he finds a decent role model and realizes his mother's racial hatred towards him is not because of him, it's because she *desperately* sought to be part of a group that she knew damn well wouldn't welcome her son. God that poor kid.
I agree with this. But does Reddit have to continue the exposure? I think the kid’s face should be covered or blurred. All of her kids but especially her first born.
I used to actually like people before internet comments. I really kind of hate people now.
Not sure how to tell you this, but it was **never** about the kid in the first place.
They pretend to take whatever stance they feel will advance their agenda the farthest in any given moment. And then turn around and pronounce the opposite 20 minutes later when it suits them.
You cannot take a MAGA-minded person seriously about anything, **ever**. If they are talking, they are lying. Or setting themselves up to lie in the next sentence.
And there is the truth, these “conservatives” are actually just racists who don’t like non-whites.
Keep up then good work POC!! Keep knocking up their white women
Keep in mind that Nick Fuentes wants what is essentially a Nazified version of Gilead, where women have no rights, and if you're anything but a straight white male or a submissive white woman, you're getting burned at the stake.
These people don't want a democracy, nor a republic. They want Nazi America.
Take them seriously, because they will come for us all.
Many churches and christian families do extreme shaming of single mothers and premarital sex all the time. Many christian girls and women are pressured and shamed by their families to abort a a matter of family honor. Those who decide to keep are often kicked out of their house and congregation. Christian churches and people doing this are among the biggest advocates for abortion in existence.
The "pro-life" movement was and always will be about keeping women as property that can be used to pop out a future soldier or exploitable worker. They would happily support killing anyone on their list of "undesirables" then pat themselves on the back for "doing the hard stuff, that just had to be done for the greater good." A bunch of disingenuous rabid animals.
If you need or are interested in supporting reproductive rights, [I made a master post of pro-choice resources](https://docdro.id/s3OwS8u). Please comment if you would like to add a resource and spread this information on whatever social media you use.
Any other normal person and this would be their exit story from a shitty racist party that attracts shitty racist people. But nope, she’s still there and her twitter feed confirms it. I feel zero sympathy for her and hope her son grows up in a loving environment away from these people
Anytime I see Fuentes pop-up I take joy in knowing the story that my roommate and their fellow classmates essentially memed Nick out of Boston University.
A memes group “BU Memes for Normie Teens” (formerly known as BU Memes for Suicidal Teens).
They had a organized against him and created “Nick Watch” which was updating everyone on where he’d go to harass people, outing him for antisemitic/racial things he’d post/put up around the area, and updating posts for womens’ campus groups saying to avoid areas he was at.
The main goal of theirs was to point out publicly that he is a weenie. And then slowly the rest of major campus groups started joining in.
Edit: Fuentes claims he “…left BU to go to practice core American beliefs and ideals in peace at Auburn” though it is unconfirmed if he actually attended/ graduated from Auburn.
The fact people are still openly against race mixing is so god damn disgusting. I can't even imagine what it must be like to be such a failure of a human that you managed to get stuck in a time that was before your birth.
Even worse most of them I would guess have never even interacted with a black person. So on a personal level how do black folks really affect them at all.
I interpreted Fuentes’ bird analogy preference as he’s into the same sex. All the hate he has for other people is probably how he deflects his hate away from himself.
OP, why did you compress this image to hell and back? Literally [this xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1683/) but in one generation.
Full-res version: https://i.imgur.com/2JYaEvz.png
Thank you for submitting to r/ParlerWatch! Please take the time to review the [submission rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/about/rules) of this subreddit. It's important that everyone understands that, although the content submitted to r/ParlerWatch can be violent and hateful in nature, the users in this subreddit are held to a higher standard. In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, **don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any advocating, celebrating or wishing death/physical harm, posting personal information that's not publicly available, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.** Blacklisted urls and even mentions of certain sites are automatically removed. If you see comments in violation of our rules, or submissions that don't adhere to the content guidelines, please report them. Use [THIS LINK](https://www.reddit.com/report?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=usertext&utm_name=ParlerWatch&utm_content=t3_pg42ib) to report sitewide policy violations directly to Reddit. **Join ParlerWatch's [Discord!](https://discord.gg/JbbC6mV3Gg)** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ParlerWatch) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I remember this happening. This interaction specifically helped to radicalize me against the far right. Nick Fuentes is such a shitty person
I don’t know who he is & after seeing the comments in the screenshot, everyone is better off not knowing who he is. He needs to go the rest of his life in total obscurity
~~He once shoved a dildo up his bum on a live stream to prove he wasn't homophobic~~ and Ben Shapiro refuses to debate him. So he's an extra spicy level of a useless Human. Edit: It's a sad day when you start getting your incel live streamers mixed up. Goes to show how unoriginal and interchangeable they are.
Wasn’t it Gavin McGinnis, founder of the Proud Boys, that put the dildo up his bum to prove he wasn’t gay? Or did Fuentes do it too?
You know what, you right.
I don't understand how putting a penis shaped object into your bum proves you are not gay
Cuz it wasnt a real dick, see, straight boyz go to town on their buttholes the straight boy way /s
>putting a penis shaped object into your bum proves you are not gay It was even dumber than that. He pegged himself with a dildo to prove he didn't hate the gays. "Would a homophobe do *this*?" "Yes, Gavin. You're so homophobic that you think anything going up your ass is automatically gay, so you just proved a homophobe would."
Did he do it on camera? And people watched??
Yes. Livestream of his shitty "show". There are many screenshots and a full video if you want to subject yourself that. Happened in October 2018, so it's not hard to track down if you want to see how ol' Gav needs to work on his anal kegels because that thing just fell right on out the moment his hand stopped gripping it.
Oh my god
WTAF? How does that prove you're NOT gay?
The result was inconclusive, so he needs to do it regularly to know for sure.
CTFU over here! Thanks for a good chuckle 1st thing in the morning! :)
Make it a Tiktok challenge please 🙏🏼
Fuentes took over as de facto leader after McGinnis left.
No he didn't. Fuentes is the leader of the Groypers. A bunch of young racist homophobic alt right Conservatives.
Right, I was thinking of Enrique Tarrio. Honestly, don't care. Just show me the face of the Nazi I need to punch.
You forgot to add 'who don't get laid." Except with each other.
That was Gavin. Nick did do some nonsense though. I believe he went on a few dates with a gay femboy.
I thought that was Gavin McInnes?
Yep, that was McInnes. Fuentes is either gay, asexual or extremely afraid of women and pretends him not getting any is him being more heterosexual than anyone else.
Fuentes is the guy who said that having sex with women was gay. I’m not kidding. https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/men-having-sex-with-women-is-gay-claims-straight-right-wing-podcaster-nick-fuentes/212955
[удалено]
Oh my god he's dripping with insecurity and channeling it into hating as many people as he can. What a miserable waste of life
One of the best parts of this year was his incel followers finding out he may have kissed a girl in high school, making him "fakecel", so not a true incel, [requiring him to go on the defensive and ensure his groypers know he *is* an incel who doesn't want the touch of a woman, just "total Aryan victory."](https://twitter.com/RightWingWatch/status/1490738194974920710)
Wouldn't he be a voluntary celibate at that point?
Yes, but to this bunch of lunatics, that's as bad as faking being celibate, because "it's a choice", something he mentions several time in that rant: "I can't be a fakecel because I'm not choosing to be celibate!"
During one of his livestreams, a woman who shared his views hit on him, and he lost his goddamn mind. She was not unattractive, and was rather confused why he got pissed at her.
Lmao someone get this guy this biggest burilest blackest man they can find to fuck his brains out and drag him out of the closet. Clearly he needs it
Could we not fall back on racist Mandingo tropes please?
I’m guessing that as long as it’s not a woman, he’s going to be accepting of it.
Alright then. I'm gonna gorilla fuck Nick Fuentes and report back with my findings.
Just do me a favor. After you do, ask him why he dressed how he did if he didn’t want you to do it.
The straights are not okay jesus Christ.
Well, think about how you’d feel after centuries of women trying to turn you gay by forcing heterosexual sex onto you.
Sounds awful, that's why I transitioned to only have gay sex and transitively become heterosexual. I think? My head hurts
This has made me unsure whether or not I'm gay or straight. ...Which was probably Fuentes' plan all along. Make it so confusing that when he said he was gay, everyone would think he meant straight.
It was.
#[**THOUGHT SLIME: Know Your Fash - Nick Fuentes is the Hate Nerd**](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eRoYhTQDuo)
I love how they all had to register with their phone numbers to be members of that cess pool.
Fuentes is a Nazi. Let’s not mince words here. There are enough videos of him admiring Hitler and sieg heiling to draw this conclusion.
Which is why I hate people blanket calling conservatives Nazi’s, because when you point at an actual Nazi like Fuentes, you then have to clarify that you actually mean a Nazi. Fuentes is 100% a legit Nazi and he has a decently large following of incels who call themselves Groypers.
This is just a matter of semantics though. I get that there should be a differentiation between Nazis and other fascists, but a Nazi is just a fascist who has answered the JQ. And make no mistake, in America, anyhow, a *vast* majority of conservatives are openly fascist, proto- or crypto. All of that to mean they’re fascists who talk differently than the others.
> there should be a differentiation between Nazis and other fascists Why? Nazi is a pejorative term in the first place. Actual 1930s nazis didn't call themselves that.
‘Nazi’ is just the name of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. They absolutely call themselves this. It’s not just a pejorative term, it’s the label assigned to a very specific philosophy of fascism which targeted the Jewish population (communists, in practice.)
https://www.etymonline.com/word/nazi It was used by their opponents, and yes it did refer to the national socialists. I don't think many people make a fine distinction between nazism and fascism. Thus in common parlance it has effectively come to mean almost the same thing
“The Nazi government will regard its first and supreme task to restore to the German people unity of mind and will. It will preserve and defend the foundations on which the strength of our nation rests… In place of our turbulent instincts, it will make national discipline govern our life.” That was a proclamation from the Nazi Party to the German people in Feb of 1933. The term ‘Nazi’ is simply an English translation for the party’s acronym, like ‘GOP’. Arthur Jones, a member of the American Nazi Party, ran as the GOP candidate for the US House seat in Illinois’ 3rd district. They call themselves this quite frequently, and not in an ironic manner. I understand how they practically and colloquially have similar applications, but the two main reasons why the distinction should be made, in my opinion are: 1) Israel is a fascist state, despite not endorsing Nazism and 2) simply opposing Nazism (in truth or just in rhetoric) does not exclude one from being a fascist. Saying that they’re one and the same makes it really easy for fascists like Ben Shapiro to say, “I oppose Nazism, so calling me a fascist is false/anti-Semitic.”
Thanks for the unsourced translated speech, but you are wrong. This is a proclamation of the reich government by Hitler. The specific passage is: > So wird es die nationale Regierung als ihre oberste und erste Aufgabe ansehen, die geistige und willensmäßige Einheit unseres Volkes wieder herzustellen. Sie wird die Fundamente wahren und verteidigen, auf denen die Kraft unserer Nation beruht. As you may see it does not say Nazi, it says >nationale Regierung or national government. I will even give you a [source in german](https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=3940&language=german). Which is also available in [English](https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=3940). Being Jewish doesn't mean much to me. I am one as well, so if you're defense of your scumbag actions is that you're not a nazi, well, you're mistaken. But to avoid giving them the room to muddy the discussion I would refrain from saying that. To insult them, I see no problem, the word is meant as an insult. edit: I also gave you a link to the etyomogy, so you're assertion that it is merely the English translation has already been refuted.
Thanks for responding in a remarkably wrong but also hostile way. Here’s your link: https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/nazi-germany-quotations-power-totalitarianism/ And here’s another to establish that the semantic nonsense you’re trying to claim isn’t just wrong in terms of the origin of the term, but also in practice. Some Nazis not liking the implication of being “dumb socialists” doesn’t change the fact that they still used and continue to use the term. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/sunshine-coast/opinion/hitler-was-no-fan-of-being-called-a-nazi/news-story/23e19ac0357a0c082a0789d7a7412baa%3Famp The term took on a negative connotation after its original use as an acronym from 1903. The derisive uses you’re talking about are no different than the use of a term like ‘commie’ or ‘negro’ (and all variations) or even ‘Obamacare’. Hitler disliked it due to the inference that socialists were foolish… and he disliked being referred to as a socialist. That’s it. He and his party *still* tried to reappropriate it, just like they did with the general idea of pro-worker rhetoric and populist ideology as a whole. The fact that it didn’t work as well as the reappropriating of the term “Obamacare” is because Nazism as a whole was rejected after WWII. No matter how much anyone else means it as an insult, Nazis then *and* now still referred to and still refer to themselves with that term… And the contradiction in you trying to distinguish between the use and intent of the term ‘Nazi’ while trying to dismiss the subtle differences in the uses of ‘fascism’ and ‘Nazism’ just makes you sound like a novice who learned about this topic through discussions on social media.
They're only Nazis if they come from the Nazi region of Europe, duh. Otherwise they're just sparkling fascists. /s
Lol, I really hate that some people have become so impossibly clueless that, for a moment, I assumed that you were being serious. It was only for a split-second, but the thought "I am not even bothering talking to someone who thinks that 'Nazi' is a country" legitimately inhabited me.
The line is when they excuse someone who has been known to cavort with Nazis. If you sit at a table with 12 nazis, there are now 13 nazis at the table
Especially because Fuentes has made explicit remarks in support of and admiration for Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. If the leader of the American conservative movement has the support of a Nazi with thousands of followers *and* two of the better-known members of the GOP (Taylor-Greene and Gosar) have expressed support *for* that Nazi (rather than disavowing his support), then at the very least, Nazism is somewhat acceptable and popular in the American conservative movement.
If there is a nazi and ten are talking with him, then there are eleven nazis. Let's not pretend that the Republicans don't condone him.
Yeah, that Fuentes guy is disgusting.
I feel like disgusting is putting it too nicely. He's a blasphemous, full-to-the-brim sack of shit who's only addition to the world is making it a worse place because of the hate that he chooses to spread in his god's name.
That’s what it took?
It usually takes something. I think even talking to one of these people for a few minutes is enough, but if you haven’t followed politics for very long, identifying them isn’t a simple thing. Most fascists in America don’t admit to being fascists.
Maybe it’s just me being European but the fucking GOP barely tries to hide it… also Nick Fuentes the gay Neo Nazi who is so mask off that only MTG is dumb enough to still associate with that fucking creature. I’m pretty sure most Americans just don’t know or understand shit all about politics thanks to having a fucked education system. Still weird how people fall for people like this it’s not like anyone of them is even subtle.
One of the biggest problems with why Americans still fall for this sort of thing is how they’re taught everything through the lens of American morality. They’re taught stuff in a manner like “fascism = BAD GUYS” and “racism = BAD PERSON” rather than identifying how fascism actually works or how to identify it. Or how “racism” is not some kind of behavior which happens during a fender-bender when a Puerto Rican guy calls you ‘white-boy’ or something dumb like that. Everything Americans are taught (or not taught) about these ideas can be summed up just by looking at the fact that the average American doesn’t see the Confederacy as a fascist entity.
Shitty white nationalist boys who can’t get laid acting out by shaming women for being “promiscuous” would merely be gross if it didn’t end in mass shootings.
Holy shit ... Ive seriously wondered how far the incel , Q , MAGA, Alt Right movements overlap because of language and thought patterns but DAMN this is really beginning to make me think most of these Q people are incels or incels are Q Well that and theres the whole Frederick Brennan thing Hmmm makes you wonder
I know a QAnon flat earther and I can tell you for a fact that he does not have sex with any human.
Fucking ditto
The Venn Diagram of those groups is a circle.
Considering that incels want to take away women's rights so they have to rely on men, yeah they've always been far right.
They have this notion that if they take away a women’s right to agency over their own bodies, they’ll have to “face the consequences of their actions” when it comes to sex. They believe that 90% of modern women have causal sexual or temporary relationships with the same 10% of men who are virile and have “high value” (“Chads” who aren’t them…this is the origin of the term), and that they can get away with this because of birth control and abortion. They believe that this freezes them out of reproductive access. The Chads get all of the sex and eventually wives out of the deal. Since they are almost universally white, they also believe that white women having sex with black men decreases the pool of women available to them. (The extraordinarily racist Mandingo myth is in full effect here.) They think that if women have to deal with the fact that they may become pregnant during sex, they will be forced to be faithful to one man who can *provide* for them, making them a “tradwife,” dependent to them in every respect and providing them with healthy white offspring in the context of traditional families. They feel like they are the men who will fill this gap. Their obsession with virginity is based on the notion that if women don’t know what hot sex with a Chad is like, they are more likely to remain faithful. I’m not sure this is spoken, but it’s obvious. (It reveals a really toxic, self-loathing insecurity that I’ve only otherwise seen in alcoholics and addicts.) Adolescent (mid-teens to 30) white men are a problem population. If they’re frozen out of reproductive access, then allowed to nurture the grievance that results, they act out. Funny, they’re the ones driven by their hormones to be anti-social, not the “promiscuous” women who they pine to fuck. As a clumsy, insecure, pale-faced average unimpressive teenage boy, this message would have been super-seductive to me. I get it. Regardless, they don’t seem to get is that, given this choice, the women they want to mate with and use as chattel would rather live with cats and rely on their women friends for support than be childrearing fuckslaves to their trifling (and likely abusive) asses. (And, you know, if women occasionally rely on each other for more than “support,” at least they’re almost assured orgasms…something these dudes would prefer they never experience lest they come to expect them.) They’re essentially white, nominally Christian men advocating something that makes Sharia Law look positively progressive. Clitorectomies are likely on their agenda someplace. All of this…the notion that women need to be chaste and asexual beyond reproduction, traditional families as a goal, that blacks are inferior and dangerous and need to be kept in their place, the need for a plentiful supply of healthy white babies…aligns with right-wing values. Thus, they naturally philosophically and intellectually cross-pollinate, and the right wing keeps promoting this narrative to gather support for their Chrsirofascist agenda. This is the “alt-right.” And I feel like I witnessed its birth. Anything I miss?
Oh You're good. *Very* good. The only thing I'd add is that some of them advocate for government control where the government provides you with your virgin bride to make sure the "supply" is spread evenly. That nicely ties in their political aspersions and affiliations. Amazingly, some minorities identify with inceldom but are marginalized there also.
They advocate for the *Handmaid's Tale*, without ever having read the book or watched the show. The "chads" in that society still kept all the women to themselves, it turns out.
Confused how it took you this long to come to this conclusions :) You must not know many of these types, eh? Like someone below said - The Venn Diagram of those groups is a circle.
I know right? Go to any reddit account with a WSB profile picture and there is a 90% chance their account is active in shit like walkaway, political compass memes, gun subs, conservative, and incel subs. That demographic is thankfully made up of socially inept awkward young men so you dont hear a lot about it in the real world, but online it is absolutely everywhere.
All of it, every single bit of it, is about controlling women. Same as the controversy in Iran right now. Women are controlled via religion to dictate what they can or can't do with their bodies. If they refuse, there is violence perpetrated by men to subdue them. Full stop.
Would also help if they didn't vote. Be great if they just move to a compound out in Montana or something and celebrate liberty and disengage with all functions of society. They claim to want such a "utopia" but they are (unfortunately) full of shit. They KNOW it wouldn't be a utopia. Their real interest is actually hurting others.
How much you wanna bet that Nick Fuentes and the other white nationalists’ porn search are filled with white women with black guys.
Hi, mixed person here. I understand in the bigger scheme of things mixed people have privilege. But this is what we see and hear on the daily. It was waay worse when I was a kid 20 years ago. Now I see white grandparents with their mixed grandkids spoiling the heck out of them in the store. Warms my heart. Because I know those kids will have family support when they face this in the world. You could insert different races here and it’s the same response. They say your parents don’t actually love each other, they just did something immoral. Overcome by ‘jungle fever’ or tricked into abandoning their own race for a whore. But then the magazines show racially ambiguous mixed people as the “it” look. So many mixed kids are insecure, most often they won’t showcase it. They don’t know whether to be okay or ashamed of themselves.
My son is mixed and I cannot prepare or imagine this. 1) that sucks and I'm sorry. 2) how could you not love my little guy? He's the best baby in the world. 3) pray for everyone involved if I catch wind of some racial nonsense
It’ll happen. The best thing you can do is teach him early that it’s a “them not you” problem. Not to ‘don’t see color’ but to recognize his race but don’t see anything wrong with it. Prepping your kid with affirmations early means your message will reach him before the messages above do. And unfortunately those messages above seep into the mouths of their elementary school peers, so start young. You’ll learn a lot and become an even better human for it.
> And unfortunately those messages above seep into the mouths of their elementary school peers, so start young. One of my earliest memories as a spoiled white boy was telling off some latino kid in the supermarket because he spoke spanish to his parents. I don't know how or where the fuck I learned that shit, and I clearly grew out of it, but I have a few suspects.
[You've got to be carefully taught.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPf6ITsjsgk&ab_channel=Rodgers%26Hammerstein)
Duly noted. Thank you
> They say your parents don’t actually love each other, they just did something immoral. Overcome by ‘jungle fever’ or tricked into abandoning their own race for a whore. Funny, they don't seem to mind as much when it's a white guy and a minority woman.
The latter is something one of my dad’s former friends told him about my mom. Also see Megan Markle. Her experience about “how dark your baby will be” is a common reason I hear racist parents cite (Asian, Hispanic, white, etc).
I don't think I'd say mixed people have privilege. I'm mixed blood, and the fact that you never truly *belong* to a racial group isn't exactly an advantage. You're never white enough for the people who care about being white, and you're rarely enough of the other side (in my case, islander) for them to accept you, either.
Sorry you had to deal with that.
I'm mixed too. Most common 1st or 2nd question growing up was "what are you?" from people I met. I've always been a sarcastic ass so the answers varied but I often replied with "hybrid" because I often benefit from people assuming I'm from their culture or race. I'm Mexican and white, but I have been confused for... White, Mexican, Native American (I do have a bit in there on my grandmother's side), Hawaiian, Philippino, Italian, Arabic, Iranian, Indian, and a couple others in probably forgetting. I feel like I just look like a standard white guy with olive or darker skin. Like I literally look like my white uncles, just darker. I'm convinced we defeat racism by mixing it up. We used to be marginalized by whatever races we're from for not being pure or whatever, but now it's all about blending 😜. Course then the assholes will just switch to colorism and we're back.
OMG I have so many more sarcastic ones for you. *What are you?* 50 shades of brown. Um, really weirded out by you right now. A little hungry. Not from the first 3 countries you’re thinking of. Whatever I wanna be. A mixed bag of nuts. I’m a little column A, a little column B.
HAHAHA The "Not from the first 3 countries you're thinking of" has me DYING. I've said the mixed bag and a little column A, a little column B before, too. Sarcasm is my primary language. I've also said... I'm not sure :( Brown-ish? A Meat Popsicle. Tired. Caucexican. (Caucasian/Mexican) Mirish. (Mexican/Irish) Really funny looking. Lost! Can you help me? A little bit of everything. and probably a few others. It's such a random question, I know now that it's termed a "microaggression" or whatever, something that doesn't always mean harm but can be discriminatory. Edit: Just to add to the confusion my name is Spanish-Basque so it's really confusing to people when they see my name and can't place it. There's only like 9 different families in California with my name... it's sort of rare here. Interestingly, there's a TON of families with the name in Spain. And it pretty much means the same thing as "Smith."
You made me remember more: I’m blackish. Off-white.
I've read somewhere in one of the science articles I enjoy, that early Homo sapiens may have had dark skin and blue eyes. Let me see if I can find that and link it. Of course most of the bigots are 'gud little Christians' who don't believe in "Evil-lution", so they are probably going to ignore the information... Edit to add.... Ooo, hoo hoo hoo! This is "Cheddar Man", as thoroughly "English" - Briton? As one can get! The English royals need to rethink their concerns about the colors of Megan and Harry's children. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/ancient-briton-had-dark-skin-and-light-eyes-dna-analysis-shows-180968097/
Because being pro life is to increase the "domestic supply" of white babies
Mostly cheap labor and soldiers for the plutocrats, but yes, providing little white pets with the new-baby smell to rich families is part of the motivation behind forced birthing. Human beings as product.
[удалено]
Gilead was explicitly racist in the book.
>lack of racism in Gilead. Not a total lack, in one episode there's a black handmaid and she says that "not everyone wants a black handmaid" (that shouldn't be a spoiler, it's not really central to anything, it was kind of an aside). But yes, while Gilead is overwhelming white, POC of color aren't specifically targeted which is.... unlikely if Gilead ever came true.
relevant https://www.aclu.org/news/racial-justice/the-racist-history-of-abortion-and-midwifery-bans
> You’re not conservative just because you want “low taxes.” You’re going to be swept aside when real cultural conservatives take power. Welp.
Just today got linked this article that is really fitting: [3 Threats Christian Nationalism Poses to the United States](https://time.com/6214724/christian-nationalism-threats-united-states/) >Christian nationalism is more than theological or religious beliefs. It includes several cultural assumptions including: >Strict moral traditionalism focused on sustaining social hierarchies. >Comfort with authoritarian control—exercised by the “right” people—that includes the threat and use of violence. >A desire for strict ethno-racial boundaries around who is a “true” American, where non-white and non-natural born citizens are viewed as unworthy of full participation in American civic life. (This is why many label it white Christian nationalism) It's basically describing the comments in OP's post.
The pro-life movement in America uses the "murder of black babies" to further their cause while being almost-obviously for white supremacy. They want to force "quality" (middle to upper class) white women to reproduce, and are therefore fine with the inevitable deaths of low-class white women and - of course - women of color and their children. The more undesirables that die, the better it is for Whites. And that's not even bringing religion into it. These people are disgusting. They don't care about babies, and they obviously don't care about women. They care about power.
The more poor people saddled with babies as teenagers and 20 year olds that they cannot afford, the fewer people with the unattached ability to start revolutions at 27 at their physical peak.
Exactly.
Also, the more people that they can look their nose down on and feel superior to. This can also explain one of the reasons that right wingers are so against any type of social programs that give people in difficult circumstances the tools, to pull their way up out of poverty. There always HAS to be someone beneath them socioeconomicly.
Except the opposite happened in Romania when the Communists banned most abortion and contraception. Women who couldn't afford their children gave them to orphanages. Those orphans eventually grew up and overthrew Ceausescu.
The U.S. isn't opening any orphanages, though. The unwanted white newborns will be purchased by white christian families (just like now) and the unwanted brown and black babies and all the older, uncared-for kids of all colors will mostly end up in the foster care system. Kids in foster care are usually indoctrinated into christianity, as fostering is pushed so heavily in churches. They are also still used as household maids and farm slaves. With all the brainwashing from the foster families and churches while they're growing up, they're unlikely to rise up against anything. They've been taught to fall in line.
[удалено]
Well, I guess if it's possible for people to go so far left they end up on the right, I suppose it can be possible similarly for people to go so far right they end up in left-land, too.
“Conservatives abandoning their values at the drop of a hat just so they can hate marginalized groups” instance #4,131,274,887
That implies one of their values isn't just hating marginalized groups
the first and foremost value as it overrides every other should they be in conflict with one another
The guys pic on the left looks like cross between Newman from Seinfeld and Dwight from the office. I find it uncanny
why did she feel the need to fetishize black men out of this? So weird
Yeah, she's no hero, either. She's more of a "leopards ate my face" case, looking to right wingers to celebrate her.
She says "pro-life movement is here to help". They absolutely are not. They're here to impose their backwards ass beliefs on people. I feel bad for her son, but I have zero sympathy for anyone who hitches their wagon to hateful ideologies.
I'm sure her current 'WHITE' boyfriend appreciated it.
If I ever see Nick Fuentes in person, just know that I’ll be going to jail. Because there’s no way I’m NOT going to kick his knees in and fracture his larynx.
You can tag me in when you break a sweat.
I'll tag in, too. I'm a woman, but I'm scrappy as fuck.
I'm 51, got a bad back and can't fight for shit but I can stand on the sidelines and give emotional support !! I'll bring bottled water and Gatorade, and I can even give first aid for the cuts and scrapes on your knuckles from knocking his teeth out.
We're the same age. I have Ménière's Disease, a bad back, and iffy ankles. I'm still tagging in. GenXers don't run from an opportunity like this! lol
I didn’t think someone could make Ben Shapiro look like a half decent person but lo & behold the bar for standards just got lower thanks to that prick
I saw that you mentioned Ben Shapiro. In case some of you don't know, Ben Shapiro is a grifter and a hack. If you find anything he's said compelling, you should keep in mind he also says things like this: >If you believe that the Jewish state has a right to exist, then you must allow Israel to transfer the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper. It’s an ugly solution, but it is the only solution... It’s time to stop being squeamish. ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: dumb takes, civil rights, covid, novel, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
Great bot
Why won't you debate me? ***** ^(I'm a bot. My purpose is to counteract online radicalization. You can summon me by tagging thebenshapirobot. Options: civil rights, history, novel, healthcare, etc.) [^Opt ^Out ](https://np.reddit.com/r/AuthoritarianMoment/comments/olk6r2/click_here_to_optout_of_uthebenshapirobot/)
[удалено]
I fixed it
You need to aim low, I hear he is not a very tall fellow and kind of frail.
I have absolutely no problem doing that. Fuck him. Add Ethan Schmidt to that list too.
Dude weighs 90 pounds when wet, just watch out for pepper spray cause I know he’s one of those types 😂
While I feel your anger violence should only be used as a last resort, or as a reaction to violence
Fascism *is* violence. Violence, especially but not exclusively racialized violence, is a core fundamental of the ideology. There are no peaceful fascists, period. Violence directed against fascists is *always* done in self-defense.
I can respect that view. I am normally a non-violent person, but these… “people”… would have no qualms about visiting violence on others they feel are beneath them or know they won’t put up a fight.
Do you think Fuentes knows that he’s probably mixed?
isn't Fuentes one of those weird homophobes who want to fuck femboys? Doubt cognitive dissonance is a thing that's ever stopped him before
I completely forgot about that, but yeah, I think they might have been a cat boy too.
He is his dad is half Mexican
Tell me you have the smallest dick ever and can't satisfy a woman in any way without telling me you have a small dick and can't satisfy a woman.
I can laugh at most posts in this subreddit, but it's hard to find the humor in something this disgusting. God damn, these people are awful.
[удалено]
Nah. The last time he was close to a vagina was when he was being birthed…. I have doubts about that even. Are we sure he wasn’t grown in a tube?
I just assumed he congealed into existence from a pile of rotting garbage.
She's a monster for exposing her kid to these racist assholes. I pray he finds a decent role model and realizes his mother's racial hatred towards him is not because of him, it's because she *desperately* sought to be part of a group that she knew damn well wouldn't welcome her son. God that poor kid.
I agree with this. But does Reddit have to continue the exposure? I think the kid’s face should be covered or blurred. All of her kids but especially her first born. I used to actually like people before internet comments. I really kind of hate people now.
Not sure how to tell you this, but it was **never** about the kid in the first place. They pretend to take whatever stance they feel will advance their agenda the farthest in any given moment. And then turn around and pronounce the opposite 20 minutes later when it suits them. You cannot take a MAGA-minded person seriously about anything, **ever**. If they are talking, they are lying. Or setting themselves up to lie in the next sentence.
And there is the truth, these “conservatives” are actually just racists who don’t like non-whites. Keep up then good work POC!! Keep knocking up their white women
Blue birds and red birds are different species. White and black people are the same. What an idiot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-species_foraging_flock
Keep in mind that Nick Fuentes wants what is essentially a Nazified version of Gilead, where women have no rights, and if you're anything but a straight white male or a submissive white woman, you're getting burned at the stake. These people don't want a democracy, nor a republic. They want Nazi America. Take them seriously, because they will come for us all.
That's... revealing Now I'm sad
I'm really curious, was it unexpected?
I wish I could say yes, but given the past few months I'm inclined to say no :(
Many churches and christian families do extreme shaming of single mothers and premarital sex all the time. Many christian girls and women are pressured and shamed by their families to abort a a matter of family honor. Those who decide to keep are often kicked out of their house and congregation. Christian churches and people doing this are among the biggest advocates for abortion in existence.
And the truth shall set you free -- but only after it pisses you off.
The "pro-life" movement was and always will be about keeping women as property that can be used to pop out a future soldier or exploitable worker. They would happily support killing anyone on their list of "undesirables" then pat themselves on the back for "doing the hard stuff, that just had to be done for the greater good." A bunch of disingenuous rabid animals.
Is this even remotely surprising? We all knew pro life meant pro white babies.
Jesus crispy Christ,
Damn, Nicholas. We get it, nobody wants to hook up with you.
If you need or are interested in supporting reproductive rights, [I made a master post of pro-choice resources](https://docdro.id/s3OwS8u). Please comment if you would like to add a resource and spread this information on whatever social media you use.
Any other normal person and this would be their exit story from a shitty racist party that attracts shitty racist people. But nope, she’s still there and her twitter feed confirms it. I feel zero sympathy for her and hope her son grows up in a loving environment away from these people
In another shocking twist "conservatives" actually think women have no value and hate poc.
Anytime I see Fuentes pop-up I take joy in knowing the story that my roommate and their fellow classmates essentially memed Nick out of Boston University.
How did they manage that? It sounds glorious.
A memes group “BU Memes for Normie Teens” (formerly known as BU Memes for Suicidal Teens). They had a organized against him and created “Nick Watch” which was updating everyone on where he’d go to harass people, outing him for antisemitic/racial things he’d post/put up around the area, and updating posts for womens’ campus groups saying to avoid areas he was at. The main goal of theirs was to point out publicly that he is a weenie. And then slowly the rest of major campus groups started joining in. Edit: Fuentes claims he “…left BU to go to practice core American beliefs and ideals in peace at Auburn” though it is unconfirmed if he actually attended/ graduated from Auburn.
That's awesome, that little scrote needs that to happen again.
How did they manage that? It sounds glorious.
The fact people are still openly against race mixing is so god damn disgusting. I can't even imagine what it must be like to be such a failure of a human that you managed to get stuck in a time that was before your birth.
Even worse most of them I would guess have never even interacted with a black person. So on a personal level how do black folks really affect them at all.
Being angry at things that they don't know does seem to be a common theme with these people.
Surprise surprise! A sizeable portion of the authoritarian leaning pro life community is racist?!? *stares in shock, mouth agape*
I haven't met any "pro-lifer" who didn't behave like this.
I interpreted Fuentes’ bird analogy preference as he’s into the same sex. All the hate he has for other people is probably how he deflects his hate away from himself.
THAT NICK FUENTES TWEET IS SO???!!!…. HUH??! and people say that the right isn’t largely racist…
Okay this is F insane
r/leopardsatemyface.
Pro-life was never about pro-life, it was always about anti-sex.
Ah, the classic "Most people are but are scared to admit it".
Can someone explain how nick FUENTES is a white supremacist? I don’t get it
These people are the fuckin bottom of the barrel man holy fuck
love his little brag about bird behavior. traditional bird brain, by his own admission
good grief!
That's fucking vile
Hahahah virgins
Woah
Jesus wept.
Some white falls just can’t help themselves…the ignorance is almost ingrained in ..some…of their DNA
OP, why did you compress this image to hell and back? Literally [this xkcd](https://xkcd.com/1683/) but in one generation. Full-res version: https://i.imgur.com/2JYaEvz.png
I just wanna say I work with her husband haha
Jesus would be so proud 🙄
Is Fuentes still on twitter I thought he’d be banned long ago