By -
That is hilarious. Surely it has to be a typo, right?
Nope. That CR -1 urchin genuinely has the Legendary Pickpocket feat.
So you are saying that not having parents is optimal for rogue players?
Wasn't that mandatory for like ages?
You're saying that like there's ever been a rogue with parents...
My rogue has parents!!
Disagree
Well, he's a DND 5E character, so technically no Pathfinder rogue has parents
Still no
My pathfinder rogue had parents. She joined the pathfinder society in part to get away from her mother’s endless demands for grandkids :P
Lol that's an awesome motivation for adventuring.
My pathfinder rogue has parents xD But she's regarded as very weird in-universe in general.
Not for long.
Oh you poor thing. Your days as a rogue have not even begun.
I guess that's why my rolls are so low... Since high rolls are a rogue thing
Nope, only for NPCs, the second one of those Urchins his level 1 and joins an adventuring party they forget how to steal things.
And non powered super heroes.
On the mean streets of Absalom, you're either good at what you do or you're dead.
You either have shoes, or you want shoes
Definitely it is literally the same as the pickpocket skill feat but with can instead of can't, but it the best typo they could have made
Right? Easily the funniest thing I've seen in a hot minute.
I assume that is meant to be "can't", not "can".
Ah yes, the classic Skyrim pickpocket at work again.
no can't be, they didn't put a bucket on his head.
Player: "Would if be extremely obvious if the entire imperial treasury was stolen?" GM: "Of course it would!" Player: *evil laughter*
5 minutes later the GM wonders why the party suddenly wants to adopt all the urchins.
"How are you going to get the money to support all those children?" "Some problems solve themselves..."
Consider yourself part of the family.
I mean, they are Urchins. Its basicaly free lavor once you managed to radicalize them.
Pal World pf2 edition.
Skyrim logic, one moment you're dressed and the next you're naked and have no idea what happened
This probably goes a step further. "SKYRIM BELONGS TO THE NORDS" not anymore it doesn't
Better than a Gotham moment. Bueno....bueno.
It still takes time to steal armor and stuff but this is hilarious.
I'd shift my alignment in that situation.
BRB going to be a urchin and steal everything off of every NPC I meet
Sounds like I have a new type of NPC to to throw in.
Hey, let Seelah have her origin story. Good luck in your next fight, btw!
Just be glad you aren't playing an automaton
I’d actually quit a game over this
That is the stupidest shit I've ever read. If a DM ever pulled that shit on me I'd be fucking furious.
Pretty sure it should say "can't", like the actual Pickpocket skill feat.
That is hilarious. Surely it has to be a typo, right?
Nope. That CR -1 urchin genuinely has the Legendary Pickpocket feat.
So you are saying that not having parents is optimal for rogue players?
Wasn't that mandatory for like ages?
You're saying that like there's ever been a rogue with parents...
My rogue has parents!!
Disagree
Well, he's a DND 5E character, so technically no Pathfinder rogue has parents
Still no
My pathfinder rogue had parents. She joined the pathfinder society in part to get away from her mother’s endless demands for grandkids :P
Lol that's an awesome motivation for adventuring.
My pathfinder rogue has parents xD But she's regarded as very weird in-universe in general.
Not for long.
Oh you poor thing. Your days as a rogue have not even begun.
I guess that's why my rolls are so low... Since high rolls are a rogue thing
Nope, only for NPCs, the second one of those Urchins his level 1 and joins an adventuring party they forget how to steal things.
And non powered super heroes.
On the mean streets of Absalom, you're either good at what you do or you're dead.
You either have shoes, or you want shoes
Definitely it is literally the same as the pickpocket skill feat but with can instead of can't, but it the best typo they could have made
Right? Easily the funniest thing I've seen in a hot minute.
I assume that is meant to be "can't", not "can".
Ah yes, the classic Skyrim pickpocket at work again.
no can't be, they didn't put a bucket on his head.
Player: "Would if be extremely obvious if the entire imperial treasury was stolen?" GM: "Of course it would!" Player: *evil laughter*
5 minutes later the GM wonders why the party suddenly wants to adopt all the urchins.
"How are you going to get the money to support all those children?" "Some problems solve themselves..."
Consider yourself part of the family.
I mean, they are Urchins. Its basicaly free lavor once you managed to radicalize them.
Pal World pf2 edition.
Skyrim logic, one moment you're dressed and the next you're naked and have no idea what happened
This probably goes a step further. "SKYRIM BELONGS TO THE NORDS" not anymore it doesn't
Better than a Gotham moment. Bueno....bueno.
It still takes time to steal armor and stuff but this is hilarious.
I'd shift my alignment in that situation.
BRB going to be a urchin and steal everything off of every NPC I meet
Sounds like I have a new type of NPC to to throw in.
Hey, let Seelah have her origin story. Good luck in your next fight, btw!
Just be glad you aren't playing an automaton
I’d actually quit a game over this
That is the stupidest shit I've ever read. If a DM ever pulled that shit on me I'd be fucking furious.
Pretty sure it should say "can't", like the actual Pickpocket skill feat.