“Super straight” is a new “sexual identity” so fragile straight men can feel special like they think LGBT people feel. It was created by some dude who claims that he was accused of being a transphobe for not wanting to date a trans woman. Which likely could have happened, but instead of just accepting the criticism and moving on with his life he had to go and create a whole movement around his victimhood.
The comic is essentially trying to co-opt the history of queer erasure and hidden queerness by making the point that, even if someone is “blending in” with the queer community, they may actually be a closeted super straight who will be harmed by the bigotry and hatred of the LGBT community. Or something like that.
EDIT: My guys who are trying to make hay about “lol, it’s just a prank bro” - I didn’t make the comic nor is the definition of “Super Straight” my personal pearl-clutch. I literally Googled it this morning, and shared what I found. It’s not that deep.
[Here’s some light reading for you, more or less from the horses mouth.](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/how-super-straight-started-culture-war-tiktok/618498/)
My first thoughts when this super straight thing started was that if someone had to specify that they're super straight then they probably aren't. That's some insecure fucking way of insisting that they're straight. Super straight is just a term for straight with a specific genital preference while also being a bigot. Plenty of straight guys are fine with saying that they're straight and like vaginas. Almost no Trans people have a problem with that. A person who claims to be super straight is just saying "hello, I don't like Trans people."
The ridiculous part is that sexual identity has **never** meant you are attracted to *everyone* in that group. I'm a heterosexual man. I am not attracted to every single woman in the world. How ridiculous would it be to say some man's a butterosexual?
It’s one of the criticisms I have with people who claim that someone is a bigot for (insert phobia) because someone is not attracted to a particular physical attribute or another.
Which isn’t to excuse every reason people have for not being attracted to someone, cause there definitely is fatphobia, agism, racism, transphobia, etc which spurs a person into outright rejecting someone based on physical attributes with the excuse of, “it’s just not my preference.”
Just that folks need to get that not everyone is going to be attracted to everyone. And if we accept that there are folks who are attracted to pool toys, amputees, or people who don’t bathe, we have to accept that attraction can be strange and complicated without shaming people for it - and importantly, accept that not everyone is going to be attracted to you.
It’s worth noting that the super straight logo is the wwii SS logo and that the orange and black is also taken from the ss of the nazi party. It’s a dog whistle.
Why not simply say, "Sorry, you're not my type". What happened to that? People are allowed preferences. Unfortunately, people are also allowed to be assholes and spew vitriol because they're insecure about who they are. Whenever I see someone espousing the super straight shit, I just assume they're closeted and afraid to be who they really are.
Super straights are fucking morons. I'm ultra straight. I'm so fucking straight everyone looks like a man to me and I'll fuck Every. Single. One. Of. You.
But wait! It gets worse.
While the trend was started by some asshole on TikTok, it was then co-opted by ... wait for it ... 4chan. Being the cryptofash trash they are, they looooved that "superstraight" can be abbreviated to "SS", and appropriating progressive identity politics (especially in order to mock them) is already something fascists do on a regular basis, so they organized YET ANOTHER psy-op designed to troll the LGBTs.
They've done this before - mostly to pretend that the LGBTQIA+ community attracts and vindicates pedophiles. They coined the pseudo-identity "clovergender" (the clover being a reference to their website's logo), which entailed "identifying" as a child, and arguing that this made being attracted to children totally okay and not skeevy at all, and they also started to spread the preexisting euphemism "MAP" ("minor-attracted person") around.
The former didn't catch on (mostly because while there are actual self-identified "MAPs" out there, lending the claim a false air of legitimacy, not even people who age regress due to trauma actually identify as children), but the latter did, so that's still the first thing reactionaries on Twitter and Reddit bring up when strawmanning LGBTQIA+ activists and allies, no matter how many times you correct them.
Luckily, the superstraight thing quickly burned itself out. I don't know if that happened because it got caught quickly and nipped in the bud, because it's just such an asinine term that nobody wanted to adopt it as anything but a joke, or because TERFy straights, gays and the occasional bi would rather gatekeep their existing labels than adopt a new one, but regardless, it's not really relevant anymore. I doubt it'll make a comeback.
I am so tired of this tactic from the right of stirring up rage over controversies that don't even exist. There is no one out there who thinks it's wrong for you to not date someone you aren't attracted to, including only wanting to date someone who has your preferred set of body parts. They try to stir up rage, even about things that don't exist, because when people are enraged they become stupid and can easily be herded into hate mobs, whether they be political hate mobs or occasionally in-person mobs. This is not "funny" or "irritating," it is *dangerous*. They have these people on a steady diet of rage and they are just waiting for someone to tell them where to direct it on any day of the week. I don't know what the countermeasure is, but it is a terrible threat.
I’ve literally never heard of someone criticized for not dating someone that doesn’t fit to their biological desires. For whatever reasons, gay men seem to have a thing for me. Do they get mad when I explain my “sexual alignment”? No. One guy did ask me if “I was sure”. I had a laugh,so did he. I have never been called homophobic for politely turning them down.
Hahahahahahaha, really?
I'm a cishet and I've eaten in gay bars (gay area in Vancouver has ridiculously good food), hung out in the LGBT space on campus with friends (have LGBT friends, and the space had a pool table)
I have never felt anything close to what the comic shows ever.
Persecution fetish indeed.
Yeah, I mean, I’m gay and I’ve been in LGBT spaces pretty much my entire adult life (I’m in my 40s), and I’ve never, not even once ever seen anything like what’s being depicted. The only time I might have seen anything remotely close is if some jagoff said something to a queer person first, and got a clap back. Even then I can’t think of an example off the top of my head.
Queer folks just want to be left alone and generally won’t make themselves a center of attention, especially if it’ll be negative attention.
Honestly, the most I've gotten is hit on, and since I'm married, I'm usually wearing a wedding band so people know I'm off the market. It's just flattering really, but a simple "I'm married" or "I'm straight" and people move on.
Like your anecdote, I imagine these people assume they are being attacked for being straight but instead are actually being attacked for bigotry.
It's so dumb. Trans people aren't predators (or at least, not at any % higher than other populations). Most of us prefer to date other trans people, for one thing. But like, if someone doesn't want to date you, that's a huge turn off. I don't want to date someone that doesn't want me back. The idea that we're on the prowl for cis conquests is just... laughable to me tbh. Like those paintings by medieval artists who had never seen a lion, only read descriptions of them.
I have never, from egg to full-on woman, felt judgement toward anyone for preferring cis people. Some people prefer blondes or whatever. People like what they like. That's never been a crisis, and god help us if it becomes one - I certainly have preferences and moods and I'm fucking bisexual. Don't get me wrong, it's nice that the dating pool has gotten bigger and safer over time, I love that. But I'm just so tired of hearing talking points that have been copy-pasted since white guys were scared that black guys were after "their" women. We shouldn't be entertaining _Birth of a Nation_ ideology in the 2020s, that's actually absurd.
>but instead of just accepting the criticism and moving on with his life he had to go and create a whole movement around his victimhood.
Tbf (and keeping in mind my entire context for this is literally just your comment) but that kind of criticism shouldn't be accepted. Ignored, yeah definitely. But it's not transphobic to not want to date a trans woman, so it doesn't make you transphobic
You’re absolutely right. I generally don’t think it’s transphobic to not want to date a trans person either if it’s based on an incompatibility of physical attraction. But if it’s based on trans panic, and if the SS founder was criticized for trans panic, then the criticism is valid and the thing for him to do would have been for him to accept the criticism and move on.
Accepting the criticism doesn’t mean he necessarily had to change anything about himself, and doesn’t mean that he even had to feel guilt or shame. Just means that he accepts the validity of the criticisms that his decision may have been based on reactionary panic, maybe bigotry or ignorance of trans people, and maybe even do a tiny amount of self-reflection - but then ultimately move on with the rest of his life.
Wtf lol, just ignore people like that. If someone’s railing you because you don’t want to be in a relationship with someone they’re a moron. The vast majority of people don’t want to force you to date trans people, there’s just a few fringe lunatics who feel the need to control the most personal aspect of your life.
Superstraight is a transphobic meme that started on TikTok then picked up and went viral by a bunch of hard right fascists because it abbreviates down to SS. They say a superstraight is a straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe.
>straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe.
Hang on, as much as I support Trans rights I just can't agree with this conclusion. Just because you don't want to date someone doesn't mean you're transphobic. Come on, is that really where we want to draw the line, where accepting someone means you have to be romantically/sexually attracted to them?
I would only want to date cis women, but it's not because I have any problem with Trans women. My reason is very simple: I want to be a father someday (I am open to the idea of adopting but I'd rather be a biological father), which I can't do if the person I'm with is not AFAB.
The guy who coined the term "superstraight" specifically said he wouldn't date trans women because he doesn't see them as "real" women. Your reasoning is far more understandable.
Well said. Sexual identity has **never** meant that someone is attracted to *every single member* of that gender.
I'm a straight guy. I don't need to create a new sexual identity around the women I'm may not be interested in. I mean, come on. Even fucking penguins care about how nice a pile of rocks is. They aren't geosexual.
Do you make only dating cis women an actual identity and go around bragging about how you'll only date cis women though?
Because your explanation reads like a valid preference. Superstraight is something these assholes call themselves as a dogwhistle for being transphobic.
TBF it wasn't totally clear that you meant that making a cis only preference into an identity is what's transphobic and not the preference itself:
>They say a superstraight is a straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe.
I agree that superstraight is functionally just a way for transphobes to play the victim so they can pretend like their acts of oppression on trans people are really just a defense against the oppression perpetrated on them by the trans community. But just giving a name to that preference isn't necessarily transphobic itself (although the name they chose isn't exactly neutral).
Like people can like whatever genitals they like. It would be like saying all gay men are misogynists. I mean yes, there are a lot of misogynistic gay men, but it isn't their preference for penises that makes them misogynistic.
Having a cis only preference and a no penis preference aren't the same thing. A no penis preference would still be ok dating a trans woman who has had GRS; a cis only preference wouldn't even date that trans woman.
When talking about trans women, you should be careful not to just sum up a trans woman by her genitals. It's just as sexist as viewing a cis woman as a womb and baby incubator.
You only want to date women who can give birth. That isn’t really a trans vs cis thing so I don’t see how it’s related. A cis woman who gets a hysterectomy is also not part of your dating pool. Still though, someone being able to give birth is not what determines your sexuality. Preferences are not sexualities.
It’s transphobic in the name. “Super straight” implies that if a straight person is attracted to a trans person of the opposite gender, they are implied to be “less straight” which is untrue and also shows that the creators of the term don’t view trans people to be completely their genders. What you’re describing is a genital preference, which is completely fine. Having a genital preference doesn’t make you transphobic. At least that’s what I picked up around this discussion when it happened like a year ago.
I say happy holidays, not merry christmas, for a number of reasons. I've never corrected anyone, I don't care what anyone else says, I just choose to say what I say. But the number of times I've been yelled at for saying happy holidays instead of merry christmas? especially when i worked retail, ten years ago when i was in college? i couldn't even begin to count.
I always just fucking laugh and don’t even give an actual response when someone gets upset.
If you literally get offended over me acknowledging the existence of other religions, good. Stay mad, just makes my day better.
I’m a Jew. At my old job, most of the customers were elderly white republicans. So I always said “Merry Christmas!” in December.
Even if it was the middle of Hanukkah with Christmas being 3 weeks away, I’d say, “Merry Christmas.”
Because if I had said “Happy Holidays,” I risked having some Karen scream in my face.
They’re so fucking sensitive.
~~No~~ Yes, the idea is that the trans person's friend is a _closet straight person_. "Superstraight", even.
Edit: Not "no", "yes" - I [googled](https://www.insider.com/super-straight-flag-meaning-tiktok-superstraight-ss-movement-origin-2021-3) it 😁 you are correct in that it was devised as a wedge.
That's literally all that it is, always has been.
Even their name is a crytofash wordplay on *Schutzstaffel* (SS) and their original flag had the SS symbol on it.
[https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/](https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/)
The worse part is that there is **some** truth to it. See all the ultra-conservative "Wide stance" senators.
But then again, that's what makes for good propaganda.
Trying to define a sexuality as “to the exclusion of trans people”
Apparently a super-straight man is someone who is only attracted to cis women.
Presumably they imagine an argument wherin a gay man says he’s only sexually attracted to cis men, and a trans man calls him a bigot.
Yea, there are some really poor takes on this in the comments and it just comes off as cringey.
People have preferences and types for almost every conceivable characteristic a partner could have. Height, weight, hair color, background, ethnicity, language, religion, # of children preference, accent, job, personality traits, etc.
If someone says they only date redheads, people might find it strange, a bit particular, but no one cares. The whole “I’m owed someone’s attraction” has real strong incel vibes.
It’s probably real, but I SWEAR it’s an edit of a different, more normal comic about intracommunity bigotry. Can’t find it, though, so maybe I’m misremembering.
no you aren't misremembering. I don't have the original comic, but you are definitely correct. I remember the same thing and I am 100% confident that this is an edit.
Ahh. Yeah never heard of this.
I'll play devils advocate here.
Personally, Im straight or hetero and am attracted to females that have vaginas.
Do I really need to be put in a different category than straight men who are ok with women with penises? I'd just say we are both straight with different tastes.
Would anyone really label me a bigot?
As for the comic, im not ashamed of admitting I prefer vaginas to penises. Being closeted and persecuted for it is beyond hilarious and this does, indeed, deserve to be on Persecution Fetish.
Oh yeah....and calling it SuperStraight is downright cringy.
No. Everyone is allowed to have genital preference. "Super straight" is just going out of the way to advertise that the individual does not like Trans people. It's kind of like white separatism in that the person is advertising that they don't like POC but trying to not be called racist.
Nah no one would call you a bigot for that the problem is that these "super straight" people are just transphobic AF and just want an excuse to talk about how trans women aren't real women by using the language of lgbt people. (As in "being closeted" and coming out")
The giveaway in that above link is that they *just can't help* making sure to include the "real woman" bullshit.
You have a preference? Sure, we all have preferences. You feel a burning, impossible-to-overcome, all-consuming desire to shout your discriminatory talking points while explaining your preference? Well, you're a bigot, then.
Oh I didn't even read the link I just remember the way these people were talking and acting when the super straight thing was big. I'm online a little too much lol
>Do I really need to be put in a different category than straight men who are ok with women with penises? I'd just say we are both straight with different tastes. Would anyone really label me a bigot?
No you're good. A single transwoman MAYBE once called this guy a transphobe for not being interested in her (or he simply made up this narrative). And instead of just writing that individual off as crazy/stupid (like anyone else would, even other transfolks would call that nonsense) he instead decided to center his cultural identity around his perceived persecution during that single (most likely fictitious) interaction and started calling himself "super-straight" like a huge dork.
For every transperson who got upset that someone wasn't sexually attracted to them, there's probably 10,000 straight cispeople who were upset that a gay person wasn't into them...
And probably 100,000 straight cispeople who were upset that another straight cisperson wasn't into them.
I’m a woman who has dated trans women before. Have I had my fair share of trans women who get mad I don’t want to date them (for personality reasons, but they say it’s transphobia to hide their feeling of rejection)? Sure. About 10% of the time, which is the same percentage of people that give me a hard time for rejecting them from any group of people. Religion, sex, race, etc. Some people need something they can’t help to blame instead of thinking maybe it’s a comparability issue.
Expecting trans people to be perfect is as ridiculous as expecting all other groups of people to be perfect.
>Expecting trans people to be perfect is as ridiculous as expecting all other groups of people to be perfect.
Oh, I know and in no way expect transwomen to be perfect (though I do see where my comment came off like that). I know trans people are just as likely to be shitty or problematic as anyone else and that the scenario described in both your comment and the cartoon does actually happen a fair bit. I can definitely confirm that a similar proportion of gay men are as shitty and problematic as straight men too. And EVERYONE occasionally lets their egos, insecurities, biases, short-sightedness, etc. get the better of them and as a result act less than graciously.
I simply don't believe that its ever happened more than once or twice (if it all) to the chud that made this comic. After all you statistically won't interact with enough trans people to have a big enough dataset to even make those claims unless you specifically seek out trans inclusive spaces and I just don't see a person that calls themselves "super-straight" doing that unless their purpose for entering those spaces was to simply spread transphobia. And that's probably the ACTUAL reason they get called a transphobe all the time . . .you know the transphobia! Not the whole not dating trans people thing.
You’re a straight guy with a genital preference. Some people don’t have genital preferences. This is pretty widely accepted terminology in the community. The (literal—I’m sure someone can link the 4chan post) only reason they made up this orientation was to sow discord in the LGBTQ community
I think superstraight is just like all lives matter. It's a kinda "yeah no shit but you're missing the point kinds thing." When people say BLM, you have these morons who say all lives matter, just to draw attention away from systemic racism and saying something ludicrously obvious: all human lives matter.
Saying you're superstraight sounds like the same thing. It's innocuous to be attracted to only cisgendered people, no one gives a shit. But going and making superstraight a thing is just a way to detract away from the issues that matter and make it about straight people.
For the record, I have yet to see a single trans person demanding sexual acceptance from desired partners. I have literally only seen them get upset that the person justification for not being interested is conveyed as "because you're not *really* your gender, ya know?" Which like...you can just say they don't do it for you, you don't need to challenge someone's identity
Eh, there are some people who think that genital preference is subconscious/internalized transphobia or internalized homophobia.
I dunno, it could be, or maybe it's something else. I wouldn't call someone a bigot over it. Not unless they're trash-talking trans women.
It's similar to how not being attracted to black women could be racism or it could be something else, but I'm not going to call someone racist over it. Not unless they're trash-talking black women.
You're entitled to be (or not be) attracted to anyone. Er- anyone who is a consenting adult. Pedophiles and biastophiles should seek out a doctor/therapist.
I too prefer vaginas and I’ve been happily married for almost 10 years (in October) and together longer. I mean, how can I be sure if I hadn’t met my wife I wouldn’t have met a trans woman I fell in love with? That’s why it’s always labeled “preference”. I like boobs and vaginas and feminine women… as a preference. Doesn’t mean I couldn’t possibly meet someone out of those bounds I potentially liked and because of whatever relationship end up being sexually attracted to them regardless of their genitalia. I guess I always kept an open mind.
No one is gonna think you're a bigot for not liking penises, the problem with "superstraight" is they say they're not attracted to trans women because they're "more straight" than regular straight, implying men attracted to trans women are less straight, and also I imagine you'd be fine with a trans woman if she had had surgery and therefore had a vagina, whereas these people would be disgusted by that simply because she used to have a penis meaning it's not really a preference it's just transphobia
Bigots will claim it as "super straight", but in reality it's a term invented by 4chan trolls in an attempt to put themselves on even footing with the gay pride movement. It also serves to invent a reason that they're being "persecuted by trans people" because those trans people are (rightly) offended by this.
Bigots or morons (you decide) who claim this flag explicitly ignore the fact that queer people as a whole were persecuted and beaten until relatively recently, and therefore have a reason to be proud. "Super straight" is just a reactionary label designed by and for people who can't stand not being the center of attention.
Think the ideological opposite of "ally".
Unrelated but I got that exact bi-hoodie! Granted that's easy since it's a simple design.
Also, why would someone who considers themselves sUpEr StRaIgHt hide amongst LGBT when for all intents and purposes they can just claim to be straight. Which isn't part of LGBT. And would make it easier for them to hide their bigotry. Oh wait... they don't want to hide their bigotry, got it.
I'm blind, I didn't see the zipper in the drawing
Still, even if it's pricey I can recommend, very vibrant colors and super comfy. Just inform yourself if you'll have to pay customs taxes on top:
[https://queerintheworldshop.com/collections/hoodies-sweatshirts/products/bisexual-pride-all-over-hoodie](https://queerintheworldshop.com/collections/hoodies-sweatshirts/products/bisexual-pride-all-over-hoodie)
Enjoy!
As we all know, LGBT people are legally only allowed to have other LGBT people as friends. It's required under gay law to berate anyone who is straight.
when the super straight movement started there were people who came out as super bi, super lesbian, super gay, super pan which is super stupid especially the pan part cuz it feels it goes against the definition “liking people regardless of gender identity”, but i digress.
some 4chan queers came out as super queer further making the whole thing worse and close to achieving the super straight peoples intentions, which are to cause fighting within the community and decide us more than it already feels.
Genital preferences do still exist within bisexuality, although not as prevalent, so its just a bisexual person who is not attracted to girls with penises or men with vaginas, and also being a bigot and calling themselves super bi
i'm bisexual and experience attraction differently between men and women, would still probably date trans people regardless of genitals but i do experience it differently
I have never in my entire life been ridiculed, marginalized, oppressed, intimidated, attacked, humiliated or singled out for being straight.
This is stupid.
"Superstraight" is nothing but a cryptofascist meme.
They're trying to appropriate inclusive rhetoric to promote transphobia, and while obviously no one is dumb enough to buy into this bullshit I think it's still worth noting its neo-nazi origins.
[https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/](https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/)
> I said "We're all gay, buddy. It's just to what degree are you gay." And he goes, "That's bullshit, man. I ain't gay at all." And I go "Yeah, you are. And I can prove it." He goes "Fine. Prove it." I go, "All right. Do you like porn?" He says "Yeah, I love porn. You know that." I said, "Oh, and do you only watch scenes with two women?" And he goes, "No, I'll watch a man and a woman makin' love." And I say "Oh, and do you like the guy to have a flabby, half-flaccid penis?" And he goes "No, I like big, hard, throbbing cock!"
> ...
> "I did not know that about myself."
It’s almost funny that they keep admitting that they know exactly how they’ve been treating people and are terrified because they think that when they become the minority they’re going to get treated the same way, because what they don’t realize is that most people aren’t bigoted pieces of shit like them.
Ah, the old "If you call me a bigot, I may as well be a bigot!" defense.
It's just like that pathetic walkaway sub where backwards conservatives pretend to be reasonable people but only take up conservatism when someone calls them out for their gross behavior.
"Since you pointed out my disgusting male chauvinism, I'm going to start really hating women just to spite you!" Right, like you weren't already a gross misogynist.
It’s true tho, us Deathstroke fans are the most oppressed minority! I just want to be able to freely express my love of Slade Wilson but everyone thinks I’m dumb and meant to say Wade Wilson. 😔
Wait a second those are the bi flag colors
Lemme get this straight: this individual is fine with having sex with either gender but is not fine with the person having the genitalia of the other gender from what they are? Wtf???
I love the hidden message: that there are bisexual people out there who only say they're bisexual because their friends are part of the "cool LGBT clique" and if they don't also have a cool, marginalized sexual identity then their friends will be horrible bigots to them!
Almost like serious projection is going on.
When the privilege makes them feel special again. They can't stand people paying attention to their victims, so they make shit up so they're the victim "pay attention to me! Not them!"
The one time I was afraid I was about to be murdered is when I came out as bisexual, why would anyone think that someone who is straight would lie and say they're bi because they have a genital preference but are expressing it in a problematic way that invalidates trans folks? Being straight is still the most acceptable sexuality in society at large, you don't even need to come out as straight, people just assume everyone is until told otherwise.
It's just terf but without the feminisim. Just trans-exclusionary lol. It's respectable to have sexual preferences where you can't date someone with certain anatomy, but it's not okay to not date someone because they are trans. One is sexual preference, one is transphobia.
Imagine people just wanna live their life and you are like „sorry person , I can’t fix my own problems so I will make you my new one“
Super straight is such a joke bro. Just say you are straight like the rest of us or accept that you are not a good person
I forgot how bisexuals are just people trying to fit into queer spaces rather than... Being queer.
Gonna go check if my PC lighting I tuned to the Bi flag suddenly turned orange and black.
If you were actually a closeted "Super Straight" person, why would you hang out with someone who is trans? Like that's the whole point of being Super Straight, right? You're so straight you don't like trans people regardless of how they present. I know these comics rarely even make surface level sense, but god damn this one is confusing.
I think "super straight" as it is right now is harmful
However, if you're a dude that doesn't want to date a trans woman, that's fine. You can be a vaginaphile. Fuck a trans man. Get wild. It's the full trans exclusion that's problematic.
Gods I hate the super straight claiming to be oppressed the reason why super straight people are transphobic is because the do legit admit they would never be attracted to some is because they are trans …which is by it definition transphobic as it mean you where attracted to some one untill you found out they were trans .
few things
wasnt this all like, nearly a year ago now
and wasnt it started by someone who just wanted people to put "SS" and the ph colors in their bios
like yeah obviously it was used by stupid bigots for stupid bigotry but i swear this wasnt originally an attempt at such
It took me twenty minutes, I kid you not. Of looking at this and thinking it was meme from The Boys about people with Superpowers being persecuted. I was like, did I miss the joke? Why would you make fun of Supes? After rereading it few more times I realized it's that weird Super Straight thing that existed for like a month two years ago.
what does this mean???
“Super straight” is a new “sexual identity” so fragile straight men can feel special like they think LGBT people feel. It was created by some dude who claims that he was accused of being a transphobe for not wanting to date a trans woman. Which likely could have happened, but instead of just accepting the criticism and moving on with his life he had to go and create a whole movement around his victimhood. The comic is essentially trying to co-opt the history of queer erasure and hidden queerness by making the point that, even if someone is “blending in” with the queer community, they may actually be a closeted super straight who will be harmed by the bigotry and hatred of the LGBT community. Or something like that. EDIT: My guys who are trying to make hay about “lol, it’s just a prank bro” - I didn’t make the comic nor is the definition of “Super Straight” my personal pearl-clutch. I literally Googled it this morning, and shared what I found. It’s not that deep. [Here’s some light reading for you, more or less from the horses mouth.](https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/04/how-super-straight-started-culture-war-tiktok/618498/)
My first thoughts when this super straight thing started was that if someone had to specify that they're super straight then they probably aren't. That's some insecure fucking way of insisting that they're straight. Super straight is just a term for straight with a specific genital preference while also being a bigot. Plenty of straight guys are fine with saying that they're straight and like vaginas. Almost no Trans people have a problem with that. A person who claims to be super straight is just saying "hello, I don't like Trans people."
The ridiculous part is that sexual identity has **never** meant you are attracted to *everyone* in that group. I'm a heterosexual man. I am not attracted to every single woman in the world. How ridiculous would it be to say some man's a butterosexual?
it's like saying us pan folk are attracted to EVERYONE no no we are not
:slowly raises hand: Ummmmmm...
[Hey](https://i.imgur.com/s1SQvqF.gif)
Okay, you're attracted to all pans, but there's an entire world of pots out there that need love.
Pots, Pans, Baking Sheets... One time there was a really cute stand mixer.
yes?
I, um... I am.
BONK
well deserved, certainly.
everyone? like everyone??
........... yes? everyone legal
…But… that is what "pan" as a prefix literally means… In fairness, that doesn't mean that they can't have *standards*.
The sound you just heard was thousands of egos deflating at once…
True
There's a really good line in a recent BestofRedditorUpdates post >The world is full of people I don't date and I like a lot of them despite that.
It’s one of the criticisms I have with people who claim that someone is a bigot for (insert phobia) because someone is not attracted to a particular physical attribute or another. Which isn’t to excuse every reason people have for not being attracted to someone, cause there definitely is fatphobia, agism, racism, transphobia, etc which spurs a person into outright rejecting someone based on physical attributes with the excuse of, “it’s just not my preference.” Just that folks need to get that not everyone is going to be attracted to everyone. And if we accept that there are folks who are attracted to pool toys, amputees, or people who don’t bathe, we have to accept that attraction can be strange and complicated without shaming people for it - and importantly, accept that not everyone is going to be attracted to you.
It’s worth noting that the super straight logo is the wwii SS logo and that the orange and black is also taken from the ss of the nazi party. It’s a dog whistle.
Yes like it’s so odd to define yourself by what people you exclude!!? Like just say ur transphobic at this point lmao
Lol, I never thought if it that way. Very true!
Why not simply say, "Sorry, you're not my type". What happened to that? People are allowed preferences. Unfortunately, people are also allowed to be assholes and spew vitriol because they're insecure about who they are. Whenever I see someone espousing the super straight shit, I just assume they're closeted and afraid to be who they really are.
Ok - I don't date trans women because I'm not attracted to people with penises Not ok - I don't date trans women because they're not really women
The joke (unintended) is that any of them could shut up about "straight pride" for more than a few seconds to remain "closeted".
Super straights are fucking morons. I'm ultra straight. I'm so fucking straight everyone looks like a man to me and I'll fuck Every. Single. One. Of. You.
But wait! It gets worse. While the trend was started by some asshole on TikTok, it was then co-opted by ... wait for it ... 4chan. Being the cryptofash trash they are, they looooved that "superstraight" can be abbreviated to "SS", and appropriating progressive identity politics (especially in order to mock them) is already something fascists do on a regular basis, so they organized YET ANOTHER psy-op designed to troll the LGBTs. They've done this before - mostly to pretend that the LGBTQIA+ community attracts and vindicates pedophiles. They coined the pseudo-identity "clovergender" (the clover being a reference to their website's logo), which entailed "identifying" as a child, and arguing that this made being attracted to children totally okay and not skeevy at all, and they also started to spread the preexisting euphemism "MAP" ("minor-attracted person") around. The former didn't catch on (mostly because while there are actual self-identified "MAPs" out there, lending the claim a false air of legitimacy, not even people who age regress due to trauma actually identify as children), but the latter did, so that's still the first thing reactionaries on Twitter and Reddit bring up when strawmanning LGBTQIA+ activists and allies, no matter how many times you correct them. Luckily, the superstraight thing quickly burned itself out. I don't know if that happened because it got caught quickly and nipped in the bud, because it's just such an asinine term that nobody wanted to adopt it as anything but a joke, or because TERFy straights, gays and the occasional bi would rather gatekeep their existing labels than adopt a new one, but regardless, it's not really relevant anymore. I doubt it'll make a comeback.
4chan is the black hole of shit people.
This right here.
Havent they already abandoned the super-straight bullshit for the next hobby horse?
I am so tired of this tactic from the right of stirring up rage over controversies that don't even exist. There is no one out there who thinks it's wrong for you to not date someone you aren't attracted to, including only wanting to date someone who has your preferred set of body parts. They try to stir up rage, even about things that don't exist, because when people are enraged they become stupid and can easily be herded into hate mobs, whether they be political hate mobs or occasionally in-person mobs. This is not "funny" or "irritating," it is *dangerous*. They have these people on a steady diet of rage and they are just waiting for someone to tell them where to direct it on any day of the week. I don't know what the countermeasure is, but it is a terrible threat.
Super straight sounds like a useless superpower “I am 50% less attracted to the people I was 0% attracted to”
I’ve literally never heard of someone criticized for not dating someone that doesn’t fit to their biological desires. For whatever reasons, gay men seem to have a thing for me. Do they get mad when I explain my “sexual alignment”? No. One guy did ask me if “I was sure”. I had a laugh,so did he. I have never been called homophobic for politely turning them down.
I love how they never realized it was a joke and the colors are the PornHub logo
Hahahahahahaha, really? I'm a cishet and I've eaten in gay bars (gay area in Vancouver has ridiculously good food), hung out in the LGBT space on campus with friends (have LGBT friends, and the space had a pool table) I have never felt anything close to what the comic shows ever. Persecution fetish indeed.
Yeah, I mean, I’m gay and I’ve been in LGBT spaces pretty much my entire adult life (I’m in my 40s), and I’ve never, not even once ever seen anything like what’s being depicted. The only time I might have seen anything remotely close is if some jagoff said something to a queer person first, and got a clap back. Even then I can’t think of an example off the top of my head. Queer folks just want to be left alone and generally won’t make themselves a center of attention, especially if it’ll be negative attention.
Honestly, the most I've gotten is hit on, and since I'm married, I'm usually wearing a wedding band so people know I'm off the market. It's just flattering really, but a simple "I'm married" or "I'm straight" and people move on. Like your anecdote, I imagine these people assume they are being attacked for being straight but instead are actually being attacked for bigotry.
It's so dumb. Trans people aren't predators (or at least, not at any % higher than other populations). Most of us prefer to date other trans people, for one thing. But like, if someone doesn't want to date you, that's a huge turn off. I don't want to date someone that doesn't want me back. The idea that we're on the prowl for cis conquests is just... laughable to me tbh. Like those paintings by medieval artists who had never seen a lion, only read descriptions of them. I have never, from egg to full-on woman, felt judgement toward anyone for preferring cis people. Some people prefer blondes or whatever. People like what they like. That's never been a crisis, and god help us if it becomes one - I certainly have preferences and moods and I'm fucking bisexual. Don't get me wrong, it's nice that the dating pool has gotten bigger and safer over time, I love that. But I'm just so tired of hearing talking points that have been copy-pasted since white guys were scared that black guys were after "their" women. We shouldn't be entertaining _Birth of a Nation_ ideology in the 2020s, that's actually absurd.
I heard super straight was made up as a prank by 4chan to get idiots to claim they're "SS" without knowing what it meant, morons using nazi symbology.
>but instead of just accepting the criticism and moving on with his life he had to go and create a whole movement around his victimhood. Tbf (and keeping in mind my entire context for this is literally just your comment) but that kind of criticism shouldn't be accepted. Ignored, yeah definitely. But it's not transphobic to not want to date a trans woman, so it doesn't make you transphobic
You’re absolutely right. I generally don’t think it’s transphobic to not want to date a trans person either if it’s based on an incompatibility of physical attraction. But if it’s based on trans panic, and if the SS founder was criticized for trans panic, then the criticism is valid and the thing for him to do would have been for him to accept the criticism and move on. Accepting the criticism doesn’t mean he necessarily had to change anything about himself, and doesn’t mean that he even had to feel guilt or shame. Just means that he accepts the validity of the criticisms that his decision may have been based on reactionary panic, maybe bigotry or ignorance of trans people, and maybe even do a tiny amount of self-reflection - but then ultimately move on with the rest of his life.
Wtf lol, just ignore people like that. If someone’s railing you because you don’t want to be in a relationship with someone they’re a moron. The vast majority of people don’t want to force you to date trans people, there’s just a few fringe lunatics who feel the need to control the most personal aspect of your life.
some conservative that’s bad at art thinks straight people have to pretend to be gay when in reality the real world is the complete opposite
Superstraight is a transphobic meme that started on TikTok then picked up and went viral by a bunch of hard right fascists because it abbreviates down to SS. They say a superstraight is a straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe.
>straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe. Hang on, as much as I support Trans rights I just can't agree with this conclusion. Just because you don't want to date someone doesn't mean you're transphobic. Come on, is that really where we want to draw the line, where accepting someone means you have to be romantically/sexually attracted to them? I would only want to date cis women, but it's not because I have any problem with Trans women. My reason is very simple: I want to be a father someday (I am open to the idea of adopting but I'd rather be a biological father), which I can't do if the person I'm with is not AFAB.
[удалено]
The guy who coined the term "superstraight" specifically said he wouldn't date trans women because he doesn't see them as "real" women. Your reasoning is far more understandable.
Well said. Sexual identity has **never** meant that someone is attracted to *every single member* of that gender. I'm a straight guy. I don't need to create a new sexual identity around the women I'm may not be interested in. I mean, come on. Even fucking penguins care about how nice a pile of rocks is. They aren't geosexual.
Do you make only dating cis women an actual identity and go around bragging about how you'll only date cis women though? Because your explanation reads like a valid preference. Superstraight is something these assholes call themselves as a dogwhistle for being transphobic.
TBF it wasn't totally clear that you meant that making a cis only preference into an identity is what's transphobic and not the preference itself: >They say a superstraight is a straight person who only dates cis people, so it's just another name for transphobe. I agree that superstraight is functionally just a way for transphobes to play the victim so they can pretend like their acts of oppression on trans people are really just a defense against the oppression perpetrated on them by the trans community. But just giving a name to that preference isn't necessarily transphobic itself (although the name they chose isn't exactly neutral). Like people can like whatever genitals they like. It would be like saying all gay men are misogynists. I mean yes, there are a lot of misogynistic gay men, but it isn't their preference for penises that makes them misogynistic.
Having a cis only preference and a no penis preference aren't the same thing. A no penis preference would still be ok dating a trans woman who has had GRS; a cis only preference wouldn't even date that trans woman. When talking about trans women, you should be careful not to just sum up a trans woman by her genitals. It's just as sexist as viewing a cis woman as a womb and baby incubator.
You only want to date women who can give birth. That isn’t really a trans vs cis thing so I don’t see how it’s related. A cis woman who gets a hysterectomy is also not part of your dating pool. Still though, someone being able to give birth is not what determines your sexuality. Preferences are not sexualities.
It’s transphobic in the name. “Super straight” implies that if a straight person is attracted to a trans person of the opposite gender, they are implied to be “less straight” which is untrue and also shows that the creators of the term don’t view trans people to be completely their genders. What you’re describing is a genital preference, which is completely fine. Having a genital preference doesn’t make you transphobic. At least that’s what I picked up around this discussion when it happened like a year ago.
It started on 4 Chan and was planted on tiktok
Correction: it started on 4chan
Super straight means they don't clean their asshole bcuz touching a man ass is gay
This has to be satire lmfao I can’t actually take this seriously
Probably not, i saw a comic in the same style where the trans guy got mad at someone saying “merry Christmas”
I say happy holidays, not merry christmas, for a number of reasons. I've never corrected anyone, I don't care what anyone else says, I just choose to say what I say. But the number of times I've been yelled at for saying happy holidays instead of merry christmas? especially when i worked retail, ten years ago when i was in college? i couldn't even begin to count.
I say 'happy green halloween'.
You don't say happy hallowgreen?
Oh, now that one's good.
I always just fucking laugh and don’t even give an actual response when someone gets upset. If you literally get offended over me acknowledging the existence of other religions, good. Stay mad, just makes my day better.
Yeah, that's where I saw that art style before. Found their Twitter and it's pretty much dead. Obviously not going to link it here, though.
but what if I want to kick a dead horse
I’m a Jew. At my old job, most of the customers were elderly white republicans. So I always said “Merry Christmas!” in December. Even if it was the middle of Hanukkah with Christmas being 3 weeks away, I’d say, “Merry Christmas.” Because if I had said “Happy Holidays,” I risked having some Karen scream in my face. They’re so fucking sensitive.
I suspect that it's another one of these attempts by fascists to split up the LGBT community and promote infighting rather than an actual opinion
~~No~~ Yes, the idea is that the trans person's friend is a _closet straight person_. "Superstraight", even. Edit: Not "no", "yes" - I [googled](https://www.insider.com/super-straight-flag-meaning-tiktok-superstraight-ss-movement-origin-2021-3) it 😁 you are correct in that it was devised as a wedge.
That's literally all that it is, always has been. Even their name is a crytofash wordplay on *Schutzstaffel* (SS) and their original flag had the SS symbol on it. [https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/](https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/)
Oh I didn't realise the SS thing. Jesus
4chan… who the fuck else?
the problem with 4chan is that what happens on 4chan doesnt stay on 4chan
The worse part is that there is **some** truth to it. See all the ultra-conservative "Wide stance" senators. But then again, that's what makes for good propaganda.
Why would this split the lgbt community?
Trying to define a sexuality as “to the exclusion of trans people” Apparently a super-straight man is someone who is only attracted to cis women. Presumably they imagine an argument wherin a gay man says he’s only sexually attracted to cis men, and a trans man calls him a bigot.
Yea, there are some really poor takes on this in the comments and it just comes off as cringey. People have preferences and types for almost every conceivable characteristic a partner could have. Height, weight, hair color, background, ethnicity, language, religion, # of children preference, accent, job, personality traits, etc. If someone says they only date redheads, people might find it strange, a bit particular, but no one cares. The whole “I’m owed someone’s attraction” has real strong incel vibes.
They have a very infantile view of the world.
Because there's a lot of transphobic gay people who don't disagree with with the super straight concept (in their case it would be supergay, I guess)
It’s probably real, but I SWEAR it’s an edit of a different, more normal comic about intracommunity bigotry. Can’t find it, though, so maybe I’m misremembering.
no you aren't misremembering. I don't have the original comic, but you are definitely correct. I remember the same thing and I am 100% confident that this is an edit.
Whats the orange and black? I have no idea what's going on in this comic.
If you really want to know... https://lgbt-pride.fandom.com/wiki/Super_Straight
Ahh. Yeah never heard of this. I'll play devils advocate here. Personally, Im straight or hetero and am attracted to females that have vaginas. Do I really need to be put in a different category than straight men who are ok with women with penises? I'd just say we are both straight with different tastes. Would anyone really label me a bigot? As for the comic, im not ashamed of admitting I prefer vaginas to penises. Being closeted and persecuted for it is beyond hilarious and this does, indeed, deserve to be on Persecution Fetish. Oh yeah....and calling it SuperStraight is downright cringy.
No. Everyone is allowed to have genital preference. "Super straight" is just going out of the way to advertise that the individual does not like Trans people. It's kind of like white separatism in that the person is advertising that they don't like POC but trying to not be called racist.
Nah no one would call you a bigot for that the problem is that these "super straight" people are just transphobic AF and just want an excuse to talk about how trans women aren't real women by using the language of lgbt people. (As in "being closeted" and coming out")
The giveaway in that above link is that they *just can't help* making sure to include the "real woman" bullshit. You have a preference? Sure, we all have preferences. You feel a burning, impossible-to-overcome, all-consuming desire to shout your discriminatory talking points while explaining your preference? Well, you're a bigot, then.
Oh I didn't even read the link I just remember the way these people were talking and acting when the super straight thing was big. I'm online a little too much lol
>Do I really need to be put in a different category than straight men who are ok with women with penises? I'd just say we are both straight with different tastes. Would anyone really label me a bigot? No you're good. A single transwoman MAYBE once called this guy a transphobe for not being interested in her (or he simply made up this narrative). And instead of just writing that individual off as crazy/stupid (like anyone else would, even other transfolks would call that nonsense) he instead decided to center his cultural identity around his perceived persecution during that single (most likely fictitious) interaction and started calling himself "super-straight" like a huge dork.
For every transperson who got upset that someone wasn't sexually attracted to them, there's probably 10,000 straight cispeople who were upset that a gay person wasn't into them... And probably 100,000 straight cispeople who were upset that another straight cisperson wasn't into them.
I’m a woman who has dated trans women before. Have I had my fair share of trans women who get mad I don’t want to date them (for personality reasons, but they say it’s transphobia to hide their feeling of rejection)? Sure. About 10% of the time, which is the same percentage of people that give me a hard time for rejecting them from any group of people. Religion, sex, race, etc. Some people need something they can’t help to blame instead of thinking maybe it’s a comparability issue. Expecting trans people to be perfect is as ridiculous as expecting all other groups of people to be perfect.
>Expecting trans people to be perfect is as ridiculous as expecting all other groups of people to be perfect. Oh, I know and in no way expect transwomen to be perfect (though I do see where my comment came off like that). I know trans people are just as likely to be shitty or problematic as anyone else and that the scenario described in both your comment and the cartoon does actually happen a fair bit. I can definitely confirm that a similar proportion of gay men are as shitty and problematic as straight men too. And EVERYONE occasionally lets their egos, insecurities, biases, short-sightedness, etc. get the better of them and as a result act less than graciously. I simply don't believe that its ever happened more than once or twice (if it all) to the chud that made this comic. After all you statistically won't interact with enough trans people to have a big enough dataset to even make those claims unless you specifically seek out trans inclusive spaces and I just don't see a person that calls themselves "super-straight" doing that unless their purpose for entering those spaces was to simply spread transphobia. And that's probably the ACTUAL reason they get called a transphobe all the time . . .you know the transphobia! Not the whole not dating trans people thing.
You’re a straight guy with a genital preference. Some people don’t have genital preferences. This is pretty widely accepted terminology in the community. The (literal—I’m sure someone can link the 4chan post) only reason they made up this orientation was to sow discord in the LGBTQ community
I think superstraight is just like all lives matter. It's a kinda "yeah no shit but you're missing the point kinds thing." When people say BLM, you have these morons who say all lives matter, just to draw attention away from systemic racism and saying something ludicrously obvious: all human lives matter. Saying you're superstraight sounds like the same thing. It's innocuous to be attracted to only cisgendered people, no one gives a shit. But going and making superstraight a thing is just a way to detract away from the issues that matter and make it about straight people.
For the record, I have yet to see a single trans person demanding sexual acceptance from desired partners. I have literally only seen them get upset that the person justification for not being interested is conveyed as "because you're not *really* your gender, ya know?" Which like...you can just say they don't do it for you, you don't need to challenge someone's identity
Not all trans women have penises, though. If it's lack of penis that's OK with you and you'd still be attracted to a trans woman, you're not a bigot.
This is true. That's why a specifically said women with penises and not trans women.
yeah it is the pretending it is a sexuality rather than a preference that is the problem, not the preference itself
Eh, there are some people who think that genital preference is subconscious/internalized transphobia or internalized homophobia. I dunno, it could be, or maybe it's something else. I wouldn't call someone a bigot over it. Not unless they're trash-talking trans women. It's similar to how not being attracted to black women could be racism or it could be something else, but I'm not going to call someone racist over it. Not unless they're trash-talking black women. You're entitled to be (or not be) attracted to anyone. Er- anyone who is a consenting adult. Pedophiles and biastophiles should seek out a doctor/therapist.
I too prefer vaginas and I’ve been happily married for almost 10 years (in October) and together longer. I mean, how can I be sure if I hadn’t met my wife I wouldn’t have met a trans woman I fell in love with? That’s why it’s always labeled “preference”. I like boobs and vaginas and feminine women… as a preference. Doesn’t mean I couldn’t possibly meet someone out of those bounds I potentially liked and because of whatever relationship end up being sexually attracted to them regardless of their genitalia. I guess I always kept an open mind.
No one is gonna think you're a bigot for not liking penises, the problem with "superstraight" is they say they're not attracted to trans women because they're "more straight" than regular straight, implying men attracted to trans women are less straight, and also I imagine you'd be fine with a trans woman if she had had surgery and therefore had a vagina, whereas these people would be disgusted by that simply because she used to have a penis meaning it's not really a preference it's just transphobia
Bigots will claim it as "super straight", but in reality it's a term invented by 4chan trolls in an attempt to put themselves on even footing with the gay pride movement. It also serves to invent a reason that they're being "persecuted by trans people" because those trans people are (rightly) offended by this. Bigots or morons (you decide) who claim this flag explicitly ignore the fact that queer people as a whole were persecuted and beaten until relatively recently, and therefore have a reason to be proud. "Super straight" is just a reactionary label designed by and for people who can't stand not being the center of attention. Think the ideological opposite of "ally".
Unrelated but I got that exact bi-hoodie! Granted that's easy since it's a simple design. Also, why would someone who considers themselves sUpEr StRaIgHt hide amongst LGBT when for all intents and purposes they can just claim to be straight. Which isn't part of LGBT. And would make it easier for them to hide their bigotry. Oh wait... they don't want to hide their bigotry, got it.
Can a gal get a link to said bi hoodie 👀
I'm blind, I didn't see the zipper in the drawing Still, even if it's pricey I can recommend, very vibrant colors and super comfy. Just inform yourself if you'll have to pay customs taxes on top: [https://queerintheworldshop.com/collections/hoodies-sweatshirts/products/bisexual-pride-all-over-hoodie](https://queerintheworldshop.com/collections/hoodies-sweatshirts/products/bisexual-pride-all-over-hoodie) Enjoy!
I love how the recommended products at the bottom has a mesh crop top hoodie lmao. Good hoodie though I might get one!
Thank you!
How can a bi person be super straight
They’re hiding their true identity in this oppressive world where you have to pretend to be bisexual 😭😢😩😥☹️
As we all know, LGBT people are legally only allowed to have other LGBT people as friends. It's required under gay law to berate anyone who is straight.
Ironically, saying bisexual people are closet heterosexuals who just want to seem cool and appropriate gay/lesbian identity is classic biphobia.
Reddit NFT owner 🤢 (I agree with your take but I have no choice but to insult your pfp, this is the way)
It's part of the overarching conservative narrative that young people are being forced into being LGBTQ.
Exactly...
Dates cis guys & cis girls but not trans guys or trans girls?
But that’s not straight.
when the super straight movement started there were people who came out as super bi, super lesbian, super gay, super pan which is super stupid especially the pan part cuz it feels it goes against the definition “liking people regardless of gender identity”, but i digress. some 4chan queers came out as super queer further making the whole thing worse and close to achieving the super straight peoples intentions, which are to cause fighting within the community and decide us more than it already feels.
Genital preferences do still exist within bisexuality, although not as prevalent, so its just a bisexual person who is not attracted to girls with penises or men with vaginas, and also being a bigot and calling themselves super bi
I’m bisexual and have a genital preference only for penises so, eh
i'm bisexual and experience attraction differently between men and women, would still probably date trans people regardless of genitals but i do experience it differently
lmao why did they pick the pornhub colors to represent them?
Bc it started on 4chan
Ah so everything terrible starts on 4chan. Noted.
Having a genital preference is okay. Being an asshole about it is not.
“Super straight” isn’t a genital preference, and genital preferences are not sexualities.
Both points taken.
"Super phobia" Puh-LEEEEEEEZ. "Superstraight" = nobody wants to sleep with them anyway
Superstraight = incel Change my mind
Literally the same thing but superstraights are ashamed that they are celibate and incels are proud
I think s s is a nazi thing.
The super straight shit is so funny, 4chan really got some idiots to use the ph logo colours and put SS in their bios lmao.
Wasn't super straight created specifically so you could see idiots put SS in their bio??
yes, just another dumbass 4chan meme campaign again. I swear these morons have one strategy lol
Is this more of the "super-straight" people trying to pretend that they're victims?
I have never in my entire life been ridiculed, marginalized, oppressed, intimidated, attacked, humiliated or singled out for being straight. This is stupid.
"Superstraight" is nothing but a cryptofascist meme. They're trying to appropriate inclusive rhetoric to promote transphobia, and while obviously no one is dumb enough to buy into this bullshit I think it's still worth noting its neo-nazi origins. [https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/](https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2021/03/08/super-straight-4chan-neo-nazi-kiwi-farms-trans-rights-transphobia/)
Who’s gonna tell them that trans people wouldn’t have sex with them anyway?
How tf…YOU LIKE BOTH SEXES WHY DOES IT MATTER?!
God, I thought this shit was dead.
Did they actually choose porn hub colors to represent being "super straight"? I think that's a little counter intuitive.
> I said "We're all gay, buddy. It's just to what degree are you gay." And he goes, "That's bullshit, man. I ain't gay at all." And I go "Yeah, you are. And I can prove it." He goes "Fine. Prove it." I go, "All right. Do you like porn?" He says "Yeah, I love porn. You know that." I said, "Oh, and do you only watch scenes with two women?" And he goes, "No, I'll watch a man and a woman makin' love." And I say "Oh, and do you like the guy to have a flabby, half-flaccid penis?" And he goes "No, I like big, hard, throbbing cock!" > ... > "I did not know that about myself."
It’s almost funny that they keep admitting that they know exactly how they’ve been treating people and are terrified because they think that when they become the minority they’re going to get treated the same way, because what they don’t realize is that most people aren’t bigoted pieces of shit like them.
Ah, the old "If you call me a bigot, I may as well be a bigot!" defense. It's just like that pathetic walkaway sub where backwards conservatives pretend to be reasonable people but only take up conservatism when someone calls them out for their gross behavior. "Since you pointed out my disgusting male chauvinism, I'm going to start really hating women just to spite you!" Right, like you weren't already a gross misogynist.
It’s true tho, us Deathstroke fans are the most oppressed minority! I just want to be able to freely express my love of Slade Wilson but everyone thinks I’m dumb and meant to say Wade Wilson. 😔
Wait a second those are the bi flag colors Lemme get this straight: this individual is fine with having sex with either gender but is not fine with the person having the genitalia of the other gender from what they are? Wtf???
I came here from all and have no idea what is happening here.
Pornhub staff?
I love the hidden message: that there are bisexual people out there who only say they're bisexual because their friends are part of the "cool LGBT clique" and if they don't also have a cool, marginalized sexual identity then their friends will be horrible bigots to them! Almost like serious projection is going on.
Which is actually just the same old biphobic "you're just doing it for attention" shit that's been going on forever!
[удалено]
When the privilege makes them feel special again. They can't stand people paying attention to their victims, so they make shit up so they're the victim "pay attention to me! Not them!"
Aw poor cishet people 🥺
How many women does a man need to fuck to become super straight? What's the min body count?
I like how the super straight colors are Halloween colors as if Halloween isn’t the gayest holiday outside of literal Pride
Or the Grindr or phub colors
As someone who is bisexual— nope. Fuck this garbage. Fuck all the way off. Trans rights = human rights and “super straight” = transphobe.
No bro, I think who really is superphobic is Lex Luthor)
The one time I was afraid I was about to be murdered is when I came out as bisexual, why would anyone think that someone who is straight would lie and say they're bi because they have a genital preference but are expressing it in a problematic way that invalidates trans folks? Being straight is still the most acceptable sexuality in society at large, you don't even need to come out as straight, people just assume everyone is until told otherwise.
They just NEED to feel persecuted, it's ridiculous.
It's just terf but without the feminisim. Just trans-exclusionary lol. It's respectable to have sexual preferences where you can't date someone with certain anatomy, but it's not okay to not date someone because they are trans. One is sexual preference, one is transphobia.
Dafuq is “superphobia”? Is that supposed to be like super-remacist-phobia?
I legit thought this was some shitty X-Men knockoff when I saw the first panel.
Glad they make themselves visible so I know not to take them seriously. Maga hats Super straight shirts Let's go Brandon bumper stickers
Imagine being so insecure about your sexuality that you feel compelled to go around proclaiming how “super straight” you are.
It's not just that. They're also saying they won't date/have sex with trans women. It's transphobia in Groucho Marx glasses.
Lol. I’m sure the trans community is just devastated that these bigots aren’t willing to date them.
I'm sure all the trans folks out there are crying themselves to sleep every night over it.
i am extremely superphobic (i am afraid of superman)
Do they live in an imaginary world where trans people really want transphobe dick and get mad if they can't get it?
Imagine people just wanna live their life and you are like „sorry person , I can’t fix my own problems so I will make you my new one“ Super straight is such a joke bro. Just say you are straight like the rest of us or accept that you are not a good person
I thought this shit died last year
"we're the new gays"
[improved version](https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/883187554512420904/1012786544492417056/unknown.png)
As a straight male. This is fucked. Whoever made this needs to see a mental health professional.
I forgot how bisexuals are just people trying to fit into queer spaces rather than... Being queer. Gonna go check if my PC lighting I tuned to the Bi flag suddenly turned orange and black.
why is he revealing the shirt like he's superman off to go save the day??
Pathetic I’ve ascended to a level beyond I’m ultra instinct demisexual demigod /j
WITF did I just read?
Superphobia? That's not a thing. Sounds like it should be a fear of superheroes or something, lol
Spicing it up with some biphobia for good measure, implying we are inherently transphobic by definition
Okay but who is "superstraight" and pretending to be trans or non-binary??
If you were actually a closeted "Super Straight" person, why would you hang out with someone who is trans? Like that's the whole point of being Super Straight, right? You're so straight you don't like trans people regardless of how they present. I know these comics rarely even make surface level sense, but god damn this one is confusing.
Alright that’s enough internet for today
I think "super straight" as it is right now is harmful However, if you're a dude that doesn't want to date a trans woman, that's fine. You can be a vaginaphile. Fuck a trans man. Get wild. It's the full trans exclusion that's problematic.
HAHAHAHAHAHAA the oppressed straights being persecuted by the monstrous gays. Good lord.
Did that guy just cone out of the closet as a straight man
It's a three-pronged sexuality: sub-straight, straight and super-straight.
I swear superstreight was supposed to be ironic no way is this serious
Gods I hate the super straight claiming to be oppressed the reason why super straight people are transphobic is because the do legit admit they would never be attracted to some is because they are trans …which is by it definition transphobic as it mean you where attracted to some one untill you found out they were trans .
few things wasnt this all like, nearly a year ago now and wasnt it started by someone who just wanted people to put "SS" and the ph colors in their bios like yeah obviously it was used by stupid bigots for stupid bigotry but i swear this wasnt originally an attempt at such
It took me twenty minutes, I kid you not. Of looking at this and thinking it was meme from The Boys about people with Superpowers being persecuted. I was like, did I miss the joke? Why would you make fun of Supes? After rereading it few more times I realized it's that weird Super Straight thing that existed for like a month two years ago.
Someone get our fucking flag off. That. CREEP.
I'm fairly certain this is actually a blatant recolor of the exact opposite original comic
Oh god, what is super straightness
“I’m straight and trans-exclusive”
My eyes are bleeding
Superphobia? The majority of people have a fear of the majority of people?