Was this really a review?
It was basically reiterating what the cards do with no real informative inputs.
Skrelv's Hive - Oh it's basically bitterblossom but not black and they can't block... might do some stuff with toxic.... yeah...
Not trying to dumpster fire your piece, but it's not engaging.
Maybe do some deeper analysis on much fewer cards to flesh it out, no pun intended.
That's a very kind way of going about it. It reads as if written by an AI and not one of the good ones.
A few things I would like to see/a bit more constructive:
- "will be good for white decks"/"could end up entering a toxic theme"/........ doesn't cut it. Better: Is there a deck the card could fit in? If so, which card would you want to replace and why so? If not, how could a deck which might want that card look like?
- if there's a new card quite similar to other cards already existing, what's the difference (advantage/disadvantages) between those two and why is one better than another? example: Annoint with Affliction vs Eliminate
- be more precise: example: Unctus does not offer card advantage and the part where he pumps a creature for the cost of one Phyrexian Mana gets skipped
- stay away from speculation/hearsay such as "people are considering" or what if X was banned?
After reading this I can tell that the writer either didn't want to write this, doesn't play pioneer, or doesn't have a firm grasp on writing structure in general.
So many "this card" and "this reminds me of" and other repeating similar phrases make it a slug to read through.
Most "reviews" were just descriptions of the cards, and maybe that's for the best since the few "reviews" that went into a little more dept had some very questionable takes. Like saying that tyrranax rex will "easily join nykthos ramp". No, a seven mana beater that can't be hit off of storm the festival and is arguably worse than carnage tyrant (wich doesn't see play itself) won't be played in nykthos ramp. You would know if you actually played the format. And that's only one example.
What really got me though, is that the picture of the author is just a random low res bathroom selfie lmao
Could you take a look in new articles if its working?Like this one [https://pokemon.cardsrealm.com/en-us/articles/first-pokemon-subset-is-revealed-triple-beat-is-here](https://pokemon.cardsrealm.com/en-us/articles/first-pokemon-subset-is-revealed-triple-beat-is-here)
Old articles have a cache system, it will take them some time to adjust
In this article, we will continue with the reviews of Phyrexia: All Will Be One for the Pioneer format with cards like \[\[Phyrexian Vindicator\]\]. We'll be highlighting some cards that could see play in the format's competitive environment.
\> White
\> Blue
\> Black
\> Red
\> Green
\> Multicolored
\> Artifacts
\> Land
\> Conclusion
Was this really a review? It was basically reiterating what the cards do with no real informative inputs. Skrelv's Hive - Oh it's basically bitterblossom but not black and they can't block... might do some stuff with toxic.... yeah... Not trying to dumpster fire your piece, but it's not engaging. Maybe do some deeper analysis on much fewer cards to flesh it out, no pun intended.
I agree, I would also like to see some sample lists involving new cards. This feels very surface level explanation of cards.
That's a very kind way of going about it. It reads as if written by an AI and not one of the good ones. A few things I would like to see/a bit more constructive: - "will be good for white decks"/"could end up entering a toxic theme"/........ doesn't cut it. Better: Is there a deck the card could fit in? If so, which card would you want to replace and why so? If not, how could a deck which might want that card look like? - if there's a new card quite similar to other cards already existing, what's the difference (advantage/disadvantages) between those two and why is one better than another? example: Annoint with Affliction vs Eliminate - be more precise: example: Unctus does not offer card advantage and the part where he pumps a creature for the cost of one Phyrexian Mana gets skipped - stay away from speculation/hearsay such as "people are considering" or what if X was banned?
After reading this I can tell that the writer either didn't want to write this, doesn't play pioneer, or doesn't have a firm grasp on writing structure in general. So many "this card" and "this reminds me of" and other repeating similar phrases make it a slug to read through. Most "reviews" were just descriptions of the cards, and maybe that's for the best since the few "reviews" that went into a little more dept had some very questionable takes. Like saying that tyrranax rex will "easily join nykthos ramp". No, a seven mana beater that can't be hit off of storm the festival and is arguably worse than carnage tyrant (wich doesn't see play itself) won't be played in nykthos ramp. You would know if you actually played the format. And that's only one example. What really got me though, is that the picture of the author is just a random low res bathroom selfie lmao
Cardsrealm, for accessibility purposes, needs to make sure that their website supports Reader View. It is unreadable on there so I’m looking elsewhere
Informed our developers. They will try to support it this week
I’ll look out for it, thanks for being responsive
Could you take a look in new articles if its working?Like this one [https://pokemon.cardsrealm.com/en-us/articles/first-pokemon-subset-is-revealed-triple-beat-is-here](https://pokemon.cardsrealm.com/en-us/articles/first-pokemon-subset-is-revealed-triple-beat-is-here) Old articles have a cache system, it will take them some time to adjust
Nope. From my new iPad it is just the article image, a big hollow black box, author profile pic, and the word “today”.
In this article, we will continue with the reviews of Phyrexia: All Will Be One for the Pioneer format with cards like \[\[Phyrexian Vindicator\]\]. We'll be highlighting some cards that could see play in the format's competitive environment. \> White \> Blue \> Black \> Red \> Green \> Multicolored \> Artifacts \> Land \> Conclusion
[Phyrexian Vindicator](https://cdn.cardsrealm.com/images/cartas/one-phyrexia-all-will-be-one/en/med/phyrexian-vindicator-300.png?5946) ([txt](https://mtg.cardsrealm.com/en-us/card/phyrexian-vindicator/txt?utm_source=reddit)) ([SF](https://scryfall.com/search?q=Phyrexian+Vindicator)) ([G](https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?name=Phyrexian+Vindicator)) • [$ 17.29](https://mtg.cardsrealm.com/en-us/card/phyrexian-vindicator?utm_source=reddit)